How about the UN enforce it's own resolution (UN Resolution 1701) calling for Hezbollah to stay far away from the border? Thanks.
29
TheColourOfHeartacheMar 27, 2026
+43
If Hezbollah would stop firing rockets (and generally plotting to attack Israel) there would be no invasion.
But if there is an invasion, it is good to get the children and all civilians out first.
43
slashdotter878Mar 27, 2026
+24
In stark contrast to Hamas’s strategy of “murdering other people’s children while hiding behind their own children”
24
Quiet_Comparison_872Mar 28, 2026
-7
I don't trust Israel with any children.
-7
AdventurousBase221Mar 28, 2026
-7
yah, didn't go so well last time they tried this in gaza and all know how that worked out.
-7
ClearlyNotBiasedMar 28, 2026
-4
Hezbollah was created in reaction to Israel's behavior in the region. Things wouldn't be much different with and without hezbollah.
-4
AcceptablyPotatoMar 27, 2026
+24
I feel bad for the Lebanese being stuck with Hezbollah controlled regions that just keep poking the bear with stupid stunts like their retaliatory strikes on Israel as revenge for killing the Supreme leader of Iran that ignited this latest round of escalations.
24
Farewell-FarewellMar 27, 2026
+22
I thought the UN was supposed to be disarming Hezbollah. Or was it arming them. Not sure anymore.
Ah, looks like multiple resolutions and a UN peacekeeper force with a mandate they are not fulfilling.
22
StarmosesMar 27, 2026
+15
50 years of failure of Lebanon and the UN to stop terrorist groups from attacking Israel let this happen. If it were any other country this would have happened in the 80s.
15
NowayisthatwayMar 28, 2026
+1
The Lebanese along with UNFIL had every opportunity throughout the last 20 years from 2006 2nd Lebanon war to dismental Hezbollah. They chose to not ignite a civil war, which now resulted in Hezbollah firing rockets upon civilian areas. So under international law evacuating civilian population from harm's way is standart procedures for war purposes.
10 Comments