· 60 comments · Save ·
Announcements Mar 25, 2026 at 7:42 PM

It’s both possible and plausible that insider trading preceded Trump’s Iran announcement

Posted by MyRedditUsername224


https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-iran-insider-trading-oil-markets

🚩 Report this post

60 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
ScroogeMcDust Mar 25, 2026 +241
It's f****** definite
241
Sufficient_Candy1642 Mar 25, 2026 +47
Yep, not to mention that the whole Trump family is corrupt.
47
Falling_Down_Flat Mar 25, 2026 +22
I was going to say this, there is no question, there hasn't been since he started crashing the market then letting it recover then doing it all again. And now they have been caught red handed and are trying to brush it off as rumor. Margery Taylor Greene did it, she went from a net worth of 600.000 to 21 million in one month. Everyone knows they are just to chicken to do anything about it.
22
InjuredGods Mar 25, 2026 +4
Can you send me a source where she went from $600,000 to $21 million in one month?
4
dkorabell Mar 26, 2026 +1
Yes. When mainstream media says maybe it happened - it definitely f****** happened.
1
IsThereCheese Mar 26, 2026 +1
Obvious and right in our faces. “Haha what are you going to do about it?”
1
Waggmans Mar 25, 2026 +79
Of course it did- Don Jr is on the board of Polymarket.
79
Colonel-Mooseknuckle Mar 25, 2026 +38
And Baron is good with the computer. Many people say he's tremendous with it.
38
AINonsense Mar 25, 2026 +23
He just turned it on. All by himself. Nobody’s seen anything like it.
23
Sea_Working_80 Mar 25, 2026 +5
Melania! Come in here! He just did control-alt-delete on his own!
5
AINonsense Mar 25, 2026 +4
As if any of those people would have the first clue what you just said.
4
FuzzyDynamics Mar 25, 2026 +1
He pulled up the Epstein Files. On his computer. I’m on the front page, great picture. Hatchet job of reporting though, terrible people wrote it, not true. And he just hit a button, poof, gone. Now they never happened. Good Genes, Good Computers. Never met the guy. And we won Iran, they don’t talk enough about the boats. The Big Boats. They cruise the waves. And sharks too. Biden never talked about the Sharks on the Waves.
1
Agreeable_Crow789 Mar 25, 2026 +6
Barron has been betting on his dad’s policy changes since the beginning
6
JdFalcon04 Mar 25, 2026 +24
Yeah, no shit
24
B-Z_B-S Mar 25, 2026 +14
And probable, too.
14
Colonel-Mooseknuckle Mar 25, 2026 +13
It’s ~~both possible and plausible~~ a given that insider trading preceded Trump’s Iran announcement FIFY
13
Far-Lawfulness-6989 Mar 25, 2026 +10
It’s also possible and plausible Trump is a child abuser, but he got away with that so…
10
To-Far-Away-Times Mar 25, 2026 +8
Wars are generally fought for profiteering purposes. There’s a reason republicans are well known for and expected to instigate wars of choice in the Middle East.
8
lasers42 Mar 25, 2026 +5
Donald is selling American might and soldier lives to whoever's buying.
5
MyRedditUsername224 Mar 25, 2026 +7
From the column: *President Donald Trump’s announcement that he was in* [*“productive” peace talks with Iran*](https://www.ms.now/news/trump-iran-talks-war-five-days-strikes) *on Monday morning was a surprise. But an unusual burst in trading activity just 15 minutes before his announcement has raised questions about whether people with access to inside information about the announcement attempted to illegally profit from it.*  *Trump’s announcement immediately pushed the price of oil down, because it signaled that his war on Iran might be coming to an end sooner rather than later. That would potentially free up the roughly 20% of the global oil supply that has largely remained stuck in the Persian Gulf due to* [*Iran’s stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz*](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-iran-strait-hormuz-nato-allies-germany-china)*. Traders who bet on the unexpected Trump news* [*positioned themselves*](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-24/iran-strikes-persist-even-as-trump-claims-talks-to-end-conflict) *to make money from the price of oil dropping.*
7
oloughlin3 Mar 25, 2026 +3
It’s so f****** obvious. This administration is the largest and most successful crime organization that ever existed.
3
NexusNickel Mar 25, 2026 +3
Uhh, DUH? How are people still surprised by this? This entire regime is corrupt and lawless. He's spent his entire life breaking the law and the one time he was about to face consequences for it, you MAGA voter idiots got him off. Just as he wanted. "I don't care about you, I just want your vote"
3
StandardMycrack Mar 25, 2026 +3
Even if there’s no direct proof of insider trading, the fact that markets keep moving right before major announcements is a massive trust problem. At some point it stops looking like coincidence.
3
sweetequuscaballus Mar 25, 2026 +3
"Certain." the word is "Certain." Nothing could be more obvious than the nose on your face.
3
aaclavijo Mar 25, 2026 +3
This should be bigger news than the YouTube meta verdict
3
oldlumberman Mar 25, 2026 +3
Both obvious and definitely
3
Stararisto Mar 25, 2026 +3
Possible? plausible? Wrong choice of words. (Duh)
3
AINonsense Mar 25, 2026 +2
But how *could* they have known… ? What a puzzle.
2
retailguy_again Mar 25, 2026 +2
That's a strange way to say, "all but certain."
2
Voodoo_Masta Mar 25, 2026 +2
possible, plausible, or just plain obvious
2
Calm_Chemist_4952 Mar 25, 2026 +2
The window of opportunity is small. The timing is narrow. And, the evidence will be found. Follow the money. Who got rich? Who did they communicate with? How do those communications link back to the white house inner circle? Who will cooperate to avoid prosecution? There are plenty of guilty parties. They all know who they are. They may think they’re safe now. Maybe for some that will be true. But not for all. A day will come, and examples will be made. Until then sleep well if you can.
2
jeremyd9 Mar 25, 2026 +2
Just say probable
2
hindusoul Mar 25, 2026 +1
Highly likely
1
BritTheBret Mar 26, 2026 +1
The article misspelled “obvious and criminal”.
1
Stoic_cave Mar 25, 2026 +1
Fiddling the books and vulnerability.. dear Watson
1
WetFinsFine Mar 25, 2026 +1
"It’s ~~both possible and plausible~~ guaranteed that insider trading preceded Trump’s Iran announcement" FTFY
1
Amazing-Artichoke330 Mar 25, 2026 +1
He's been doing this for years.
1
01wax Mar 25, 2026 +1
Justice, for all
1
rotates-potatoes Mar 25, 2026 +1
Ya think?
1
absolutelynotagoblin Mar 25, 2026 +1
Yes, we all know that the entirety of this regime, from its head, Donald J. Trump, on down, are conspiratorially corrupt.
1
NotThatHandsomePete Mar 25, 2026 +1
Can they not identify these traders?
1
bhsn1pes Mar 25, 2026 +1
Plausible? It definitely happened. 
1
Sea_Working_80 Mar 25, 2026 +1
No shit
1
hanumanCT Mar 25, 2026 +1
Somehow these fucksticks won’t be punished for their crimes and that makes me sick.
1
miz_mizery Mar 25, 2026 +1
I’m shocked!!!
1
audiogeek1978 Mar 25, 2026 +1
Gee, ya think?
1
Dominos_Alt Mar 25, 2026 +1
Probable too
1
Uniteus Mar 25, 2026 +1
If they even attempted an investigation you would find that they did engage in it
1
lc4444 Mar 25, 2026 +1
No way!?!
1
Basic_Yam_715 Mar 25, 2026 +1
And Venezuela?
1
Silver-back3 Mar 26, 2026 +1
Duh
1
Bob-Dolemite Mar 26, 2026 +1
can they actually find who placed the trades?
1
precario78 Mar 26, 2026 +1
Will it be illegal when Trump shorts his stock just before sending 500 soldiers to die? No, it'll be just another Monday.
1
No-Cup-8096 Mar 26, 2026 +1
Of course it did. That’s how this administration rolls. Cheat Americans and make the rich richer.
1
Sweet-Apricot8568 Mar 26, 2026 +1
Surges occur before earnings calls. The arrival time was public information.
1
in1gom0ntoya Mar 26, 2026 +1
obvious and undeniable.... tired of these sugar coated ass headlines
1
estoybussin Mar 26, 2026 +1
Half a billion 15 minutes beforehand? Wow what s f****** coincidence!
1
Eject_The_Warp_Core Mar 26, 2026 +1
help me out, I'm confused. if someone bought a bunch of oil futures just before Trump's announcement that sent the price of oil plunging, then didn't they \*lose\* money on the deal? i guess whoever sold benefitted, but you can't use insider trading to make someone else buy it, you can only offer it up for sale. or is the allegation that somone in the know was moving money around in an illegal way?
1
Queasy_Eggplant9155 Mar 26, 2026 +1
It’s expected
1
EarlGrey1806 Mar 25, 2026
Maybe Trump just needs to not telegraph his actions. Maybe one of his cronies may decide to donate half of their illegal proceeds to a soup kitchen or homeless shelter.
0
← Back to Board