Just six weeks before James Broadnax faces execution for the 2008 fatal shooting of two Christian music producers in Garland, his cousin has claimed he killed them.
Broadnax, now 37, was convicted in Dallas County in 2009 for robbing, shooting and killing Stephen Swan and Matthew Butler. He is scheduled to be executed by lethal injection on April 30.
His cousin, Demarius Cummings, has confessed in a sworn statement that he pulled the trigger.
“When [his lawyer] told me on February 20 that James was scheduled to be executed on April 30, 2026, I decided it was time to come clean, and I told him that it was me, and not James, who had shot the two victims,” Cummings’ confession reads.
Both of them high on PCP and marijuana, Cummings says he convinced his 19-year-old cousin to take the blame.
https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/criminal-justice/2026/03/20/546694/james-broadnax-is-scheduled-to-die-for-garland-murders-now-his-cousin-claims-he-shot-the-victims-christian-music-producers/?amp=1
795
braumblesMar 28, 2026
+1013
So he bragged about it in a song? Is this a Key and Peele sketch or something?
1013
my_name_is_juiceMar 28, 2026
+445
Lol Darnell Simmons was my first thought when I saw this post
445
Barilla3113Mar 28, 2026
+346
"It's just words detective: nouns, adjectives. They just happen to be in a dope order".
346
Silver_Song3692Mar 28, 2026
+97
I know tell this is the only thing that rhymes with shellfish
97
Barilla3113Mar 28, 2026
+77
It's a gun... of the long ass variety.
77
Jeffffff4587Mar 28, 2026
+36
Some seaweed on it too...
36
rickitytickMar 29, 2026
+1
Coincidence
1
Jeffffff4587Mar 28, 2026
+130
THE NAME OF THE ALBUM IS "I KILLED DARNELL SIMMONS"
130
ManzhahMar 28, 2026
+44
"It's a concept album"
44
DivingElliotRobertsMar 28, 2026
+44
Gun Rack truly paved the way for Tay K and D4vd
44
Afizzle55Mar 29, 2026
+28
I killed Darnell, yeah I shot him with my nine
I shot him nine times, 9PM on the dime
And by the way it was November ninth
28
Original_Contact_579Mar 29, 2026
+15
I scratch my chin when I’m lying…
15
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
+165
[deleted]
165
DisposableSaviourMar 28, 2026
+25
His cousin’s sworn statement could get the execution commuted to an LWOPP
25
IshdalarMar 28, 2026
+31
Who's down with LWOPP?
31
keiths31Mar 28, 2026
+25
As someone growing up in Ontario, where our provincial police force is known as the OPP (Ontario Provincial Police) I was very confused as to why there was a song about our police force by an American rap group.
25
SleepyMonkey7Mar 29, 2026
+2
Seriously thought it was some sort of f*** the police thing that I just didn't get cause I wasn't cool enough.
2
MildlyMixedUpOedipusMar 29, 2026
+2
Oh thank God I wasn't the only one.
2
minimalcationMar 28, 2026
+17
Yeah you know me
17
jackferretMar 29, 2026
+5
Here for this. I gochu
5
troubleondemandMar 29, 2026
+3
That game was so f****** hard.
3
powerlesshero111Mar 28, 2026
+36
I know right? And even still, they were both high on PCP and marijuana, so even a sworn statement isn't really super helpful because it was 18 years ago, and they were high. And the cousin would need evidence to support his statement. Like, i could make a sworn statement saying i killed them, it wouldn't mean anything because i would still need proof. This really just seems more like an attempt at staying the execution, but might not help.
36
mondaymoderateMar 28, 2026
+24
Also in Texas it doesn’t matter who pulled the trigger. You can get the death penalty for just being an accessory to murder.
24
Special-TestMar 29, 2026
+2
Legally yes but I believe we've never executed an accessory without the trigger man being executed. Someone actually got their sentence commuted like that by I believe the prior governor
2
CIA_napkinMar 28, 2026
+20
Hes got a vivid imagination. *strokes chin*
20
HVNFN4LifeMar 28, 2026
+3
🤔
3
Gherin29Mar 28, 2026
+59
He bragged about it in a song and there were a bunch of witnesses, location data, DMs, etc
59
RockyroxMar 28, 2026
+51
Sounds like they both admitted to it. He sang about doing it. Then the cousin eventually admitted to it too?
51
pricklypearanoidMar 28, 2026
+41
Rap snitches
41
SupposablyMar 28, 2026
+36
Telling all they business.
36
thatsmybetchMar 28, 2026
+36
Sit in the court and be their own star witness
36
arcenierinMar 28, 2026
+21
Do you see the perpetrator?
21
candygram4mongoMar 28, 2026
+25
Yeah, I'm right here.
25
xt0rtMar 28, 2026
+21
F*** around get the whole label sent up for years
21
kevinbakyinMar 28, 2026
+3
Sit in the court and be their own star witness
3
chunkysmalls42098Mar 28, 2026
+41
Ah I see you're not familiar with drill music
It's very in vogue to rap about real murder now
I've never seen this larger version, not sure if I'm less or more sure it's Jack
17
Wyden_longMar 28, 2026
+15
I mean snoop was doin it 30 years ago.
15
chunkysmalls42098Mar 28, 2026
+9
Not the way it's being done now lol
9
jzseanMar 28, 2026
+4
drill newbie here. where do i start on whos confessing on murdering who
4
kanucklebonesMar 28, 2026
+8
Wound up on a YouTube rabbit hole sometime ago about the New York I think drill scene pretty crazy shit. Just alot of blatant murder confessions not quite Darnell Simmons level blatant but not to far off in alot of the cases.
8
chunkysmalls42098Mar 28, 2026
+6
Philly and Chicago for sure, their sublistnooks too
6
Thedemonazrael751Mar 28, 2026
+2
Yungeen Ace - Who I Smoke
2
RainbowGoddamnDashMar 28, 2026
+5
I agree with chunky, it's waaay different now.
For example, Notti Bop
5
neheadhunterMar 28, 2026
+12
A gun of the long ass variety.
12
2legittoquitMar 28, 2026
+2
The sketch is based on rappers doing that
2
CalamityclamsMar 28, 2026
+5
Rap snitches telling all their business
5
blow-downMar 28, 2026
+3
They should be executed just for how stupid they are.
3
Welp907Mar 28, 2026
+3
No, he didn't.
But prosecutors presented song lyrics like "hogtie em, body bag them" to argue he was continuing danger and should therefore be executed.
3
hpfredMar 28, 2026
+164
So, from what I'm understanding from this, people are severely overplaying how much the lyrics were used to convict him.
He was a key suspect, him and his cousing confessed the crime, and then on top of that prosecution submitted lyrics talking about that specific crime as evidence to a mountain of other stuff... I mean, it's not like they started investigating him just because he vaguely sang about comitting crimes.
It reminds me a bit of OJ's "if I DID IT". Sure, in prose and art you have literary/artistic freedom to say whatever you want... but it sure doesn't look good if you are actually involved in those crimes.
164
hellofemurMar 29, 2026
+46
> people are severely overplaying how much the lyrics were used to convict him.
Given that the lyrics weren't used *at all* during the guilt phase of the trial, I'd say that's a safe assumption.
The lyrics were used during the sentencing phase.
46
NorthernDevilMar 29, 2026
+10
That’s a pretty important phase for someone sentenced to death
10
JvreBvreMar 29, 2026
+2
Yes, but there’s a huge difference in mentioning rap lyrics to persuade jurors/judge of someone’s guilt compared to determining punishment. Yes, saying you killed someone in lyrics does not prove any guilt, but when you are found actually guilty of the crime you rapped about, then it can be relevant to showing that someone has no remorse. (I’m against the death penalty though)
2
ignatious__reillyMar 28, 2026
+44
I’m not here to argue for or against the death penalty, but having a set date and knowing you’re going to die by lethal injection in a month must be something else man. That must be one hell of a feeling.
44
Special-TestMar 29, 2026
+19
The other option is what they do in Japan where your date is a secret and you find out when they just call you one morning and take you to the execution room
19
Morrinn3Mar 29, 2026
+3
Yes, it's inhumane. There is no way to perform state-sanctioned executions without breaking several rules regarding cruel and unusual treatment of prisoners.
3
JarlBallin_Mar 29, 2026
+1
Reminds me of Dancer in the Dark. Absolutely visceral feeling.
1
bloodyell76Mar 29, 2026
+1
I recently learned that Japan doesn't tell you until basically the day. Not sure if that's better or much worse.
1
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
+38
[deleted]
38
spookynutzMar 28, 2026
+17
I think you're confusing felony murder with law of parties. The only capital offense in Texas is capital murder.
17
[deleted]Mar 28, 2026
+9
[deleted]
9
red_nickMar 28, 2026
+5
If Travis Scott said I was innocent, I'd be like "lock me up, I did it"
5
VicorinMar 28, 2026
+10
What a terrible thing to do. He waited 17 years to say something. If it’s a sworn statement from the guy that actually did it, does that mean James will get released?
10
TwinEaglesMar 28, 2026
+16
A sworn statement isn't evidence of him actually doing the crime. He would need evidence that he did it other than his word.
16
dwilkes827Mar 28, 2026
+11
No, they were both there and took part in the robbery/murder and were both sentenced to life over it. It could possibly change the death row part of it though
11
Dapper_Fly3419Mar 28, 2026
+19
So Broadnax confessed and has just been quietly taking the ride this whole time?
Cummings just throwing a hail mary to disrupt things.
The courtroom stuff is shit though. Lyrics shouldn't be in court unless they're specifically related. There was a case in FL where some local gang released a video the day after a murder, claiming it and even giving details that people wouldn't know unless there were there. That? That's fine, play it in court. But the Broadnax case is not like that, I may not agree with the lyrical choice of a lot of artists, but it shouldn't be used against them.
19
da_boopy_dayMar 28, 2026
+82
Obvious in this case the lyrics were in fact related to the crime. If you’re rapping about details of a crime you committed that aren’t public record you’re a fkn idiot
82
LaminatedAirplaneMar 28, 2026
+29
Rap snitches tellin all their business
29
evergreen39Mar 28, 2026
+10
Take it to court and be their own star witness.
10
NBAccountMar 28, 2026
+10
You see the perpetrator? Yeah, I'm right here!
10
VazhoxMar 29, 2026
+2
So.. a two for one deal? Are they going to execute them both?
2
Cerulean_TurtleMar 28, 2026
+655
Rap snitches, telling all their business
Sit in the court and be their own star witness
"Do you see the perpetrator?" "Yeah, I'm right here"
F*** around, get the whole label sent up for years
655
isarealhebrewMar 28, 2026
+193
DOOM is always relevant
193
GuessWhatIGotMar 28, 2026
+63
Mr Fantastik! Love this song. RIP MF Doom
63
Nekyia_VibesMar 29, 2026
+10
mmm, delicious. rap snitch knishes
10
annakarina3Mar 28, 2026
+553
I remember Rap Critic being like “The Insane Clown Posse would have the highest body count if their lyrics about killing people were true”
Those were fake songs though, but it was a good meme. I saw them live a couple months before that went down haha
53
AnointMyPhallusMar 28, 2026
+27
Iirc the uncropped version of the meme listed a couple real songs as well, like I Will Kill You and Skull Full of Maggots.
27
Friggin_GreaseMar 28, 2026
+14
That's the craziest part, they didn't need to make any fake songs.
14
Special_Estimate_275Mar 29, 2026
+3
To be fair Pat was only on one of those
3
AlgarothMar 28, 2026
+2
Guy probably has knives in his house as well.
2
joogieeMar 28, 2026
+128
Lmao and probably a record for the insane amounts of ways they came up with to kill people too.
128
Just_a_lazy_lurkerMar 28, 2026
+27
Brotha Lynch Hung has entered the chat
27
jameson1234Mar 28, 2026
+9
He definitely wanted to put that 9 somewhere interesting…and c*** it back slow. Boom. _____ ___all over the room
9
theeewizzardMar 29, 2026
+3
Ah, wild to run into a fellow connoisseur of the Season of Da Sickness in the wild. Babies brains, babies veins, babies spines.
3
joogieeMar 29, 2026
+2
Lmaoo can’t believe i use to try to convince people in high school that icp was spittin. Meanwhile it was just the craziest ways of murdering someone. The beats were still fire though.
2
DrHarrisonLawrenceMar 28, 2026
+7
Eminem took it to a different planet with the entire Relapse album. Highly recommend you listen from start to finish!
7
joogieeMar 29, 2026
+3
Oh yeah for sure im still someone that listens to everything he drops lmao.
3
thefumeroMar 28, 2026
+2
"I'll stab you with an umbrella... and then open it."
2
Gherin29Mar 28, 2026
+51
Yeah…but there’s also multiple witnesses, phone location data, DMs, etc. Regardless of your opinion on any of this stuff, he was not convicted for rap lyrics, he was convicted because there’s a ton of evidence.
51
ScaldingHotSoupMar 28, 2026
+6
Based on the article, this is more about sentencing than than guilty verdict.
6
talliganMar 28, 2026
+8
But they probably don't actually know how magnets work
8
SocialIntelligenceMar 28, 2026
+6
> Insane Clown Posse would have the highest body count if their lyrics about killing people were true
>
That’s absolutely crazy. 😳😳
6
ICANHAZWOPERMar 28, 2026
+3
Is it though?
I can believe that. Like off hand, have you listened to any other person or group who could possibly even come close?
3
OhrwurmsMar 29, 2026
+3
Depends on how far you want to stretch the logic. There is a vegan deathgrind band called Cattle Decapitation who have songs about wiping every single human being off planet earth for example
3
HopandBrewMar 28, 2026
+1
These guys are at least accessory to murder though.
1
geek_fireMar 28, 2026
+114
The rap lyrics were used only in the sentencing phase of the trial. They were not used to secure the conviction. Broadnax's team argues that they are artistic expression, and the prosecution erred in using them to establish that Broadnax is a remorseless killer who remains dangerous. I would tend to agree with that, but I'm not sure that courts are going to bite here.
114
powtroutpoonMar 28, 2026
+69
I think this is an important point here. Using the lyrics to provide context to an already guilty verdict, it is totally different from using the lyrics to secure that guilty verdict.
69
VagueSomethingMar 28, 2026
+18
If you commit crimes and sing about them it is evidence. Just like if you commit crimes and write books about it.
If you don't commit crimes but make songs about imaginary things then it isn't evidence and it would be silly to charge you for.
Cash etc used to use their creativity to make songs, if course they weren't taken to court for their songs as if they actually murdered. This is a distinct difference and a vital piece of context. Now if Cash sang about selling drugs and then was found with drugs it would hardly be wrong to question it, no?
18
AppendixNMar 28, 2026
+203
James Broadnax and Demarius Cummings robbed and killed two people. Under Texas law, it doesn't matter which one pulled the trigger, they're both equally culpable for felony murder. The only thing that's unjust about the sentencing is that it seems Demarius Cummings should have also received the death penalty.
I get why other artists are saying that his lyrics should not have been evidence. No one should ever be convicted of a crime on the basis of some lyrics. As the article says, no one arrested Johnny Cash or Bob Marley. But Johnny Cash and Bob Marley never murdered anyone.
203
Secure-Iron1202Mar 28, 2026
+153
If a singer wrote a song about killing a girl and hiding her in a Tesla (looking at you D4vid) , and it later turned out to describe a real crime (looking at you D4vid), those lyrics would absolutely be relevant. That is essentially what happened with Broadnax, his words weren’t just fantasy, they reflected actual criminal behavior, which is why the court considered them.
153
AnonymousFriend80Mar 28, 2026
+8
But did they also opening in court, multiple times, admit to the crimes as well?
The lyrics aren't the only thing used in this case.
8
PuttyReadMar 28, 2026
+16
Bob Marley didn’t write lyrics outlining the actual shooting of a sherif.
If there was a shooting of a sherif that followed any piece of what he wrote and sang it would have and should have been investigated.
Rapping a play by play of you killing two people is no different than telling the story in a bar trying to impress people both of which should be admissible as evidence…
16
dirbofficialMar 28, 2026
+54
While I agree that rap lyrics shouldn’t be a sole piece of evidence in a criminal conviction, deeming them meaningless is just as short-sighted. Look at someone like King Von for example, he would literally kill somebody and then make a song confessing to the specific details of it. Diddy, R.Kelly, Rick Ross, Pusha T, and countless others have songs talking about illegal, terrible things that they have admitted to doing, or have been deemed guilty of doing.
54
lobthelawbombMar 29, 2026
+4
And they weren’t actually used to secure the conviction here. They were just used at sentencing to show Broadnax didn’t feel remorse about the killing and thus deserved the death penalty.
4
Tankninja1Mar 28, 2026
+18
RIP Darnell Simmons
18
KatallmMar 28, 2026
+2
Came looking for this
2
IceCream_EmperorXxMar 28, 2026
+55
Maybe if you actually are in court for potentially murdering someone, your art about murdering might become relevant? Imagine if OJ Simpson published his book before the trial, wouldn't that be relevant? It's basically a confession.
Sometimes art is just expression. I don't think Slim Shady really killed anyone, for example.
Die Antwoord is a rap duo that I really liked for a long time, they have a Slim Shady-esque approach to their style, rapping about absurdly bad behavior. However, there is now a lot of evidence that they are truly deplorable people, abusive and arguably evil. I can't listen to their songs anymore, hearing someone rap about sexual assault in a braggadocios, absurd song hits so differently when you know the person rapping gladly assaults people. It reads more like a confession. I honestly don't understand how people enjoy drill rap in the first place. It's not hype, it's sad... Just my opinion.
Idk I'm kind of split on this. Idk if we can draw a hard-line on if art is reasonable evidence for all cases.
55
AppendixNMar 28, 2026
+29
If you write songs about doing crimes, but you never do any of those crimes, then you shouldn't be convicted of anything.
If you commit crimes, and you've got a bunch of lyrics about doing the very thing you then went and did, it seems reasonable to allow a judge and jury to know about that. The Aurora theater killer had his notebooks introduced at trial, because he wrote about wanting to kill people. These things are relevant.
29
da_boopy_dayMar 28, 2026
+12
Right that’s exactly my thinking. Im guessing people think that the lyrics themselves are why they’re being charged
12
SleezyPeazy710Mar 29, 2026
+2
Folks really do be thinking this and it’s telling. I don’t think AI could f*** up this bad. Just good old fashioned humans being goobers.
2
hellofemurMar 29, 2026
+6
> your art about murdering might become relevant
Not in the US. In general, this would be considered character evidence and that's usually excluded from criminal trials. If there's something in there with details about the specific murder ("I threw the gun in the aquarium") then it might be allowed, but if the Dixie Chicks killed someone tomorrow the prosecution absolutely could not introduce "Goodbye Earl" as evidence that that the Chicks are the kind of people who go around killing cheating men.
But that's irrelevant, because rap lyrics weren't presented to the jury to find him guilty. It was *after* he was convicted of murder that the prosecution introduced his rap lyrics to basically show that this is a really dangerous guy who should get the death penalty, and the rules of evidence are very different in sentencing phases.
If Tom Cruise killed somebody, you probably couldn't show the jury clips of him killing people in *Collateral* to show that he's a dangerous person; besides, most jurors understand the context of actors and movies so it probably wouldn't matter. Are rap lyrics more like OJ or more like Tom Cruise, and does a mostly-white Texas jury have any context at all in order to address that question? I honestly don't know, I think it's a difficult question.
6
IceCream_EmperorXxMar 29, 2026
+1
Oh so it sounds like the prosecution actually used character evidence lawfully, according to what you're saying? Lawful =/= righteous, of course. It all is a very difficult situation.
Thanks for the thoughtful reply.
1
takenorinvalidMar 28, 2026
+65
It's just words. Nouns, adjectives. That just happen to be in a dоpе order.
65
RaskalnekovMar 28, 2026
+30
This is my confession, admissible in court...
30
my_name_is_juiceMar 28, 2026
+12
I killed Darnell Simmons for sport!
12
jjjjjjjjjjjjjaaaMar 28, 2026
+6
A gun, of the long ass variety.
6
rooster6662Mar 28, 2026
+170
"Nobody went after Johnny Cash when he sang about killing a man in Reno. Nobody dragged Bob Marley into court over shooting a sheriff."
And you can add The Chicks Goodbye Earl to that.
170
Arntor1184Mar 28, 2026
+77
Yeah but Cash wasnt on trial in Reno for killing a guy nor was Marley for shooting a sherrif. The line between fantasy and reality blurs when you go from paper/words to actions. Its like when the dude from Cannibal Corpse was arrested for having human skulls and firearms in his house when they had multiple songs plainly stating such or another example is David who is facing charges for killing an underage girl and he just so happened to sing about killing a girl in the exact way this girl was killed. Does any of this confirm guilt? No, not at all, but it sure provides a solid framework to go off of.
The more interesting part of this story is the cousin coming forward taking accountability saying he let his cousin take the fall for it. Thats the kicker here and something that must be properly vetted before proceeding further.
77
Barilla3113Mar 28, 2026
+45
Yup, this is such a dumb argument. These guys are confessing to actual murders in these songs, sometimes with details they could literally only know if they were the shooter.
45
lobthelawbombMar 29, 2026
+6
Right? Like surely if a woman was found raped and stabbed to death in a small town, and a month later someone release a song about how they recently raped and murdered a woman in that same town, we’d all agree that guy should be investigated. So it’s silly to argue that art is always off limits and can never actually prove anything.
6
randomaccount178Mar 28, 2026
+22
Also you run into double jeopardy issues since Cash was apparently already convicted and served a life sentence in Folsom Prison for the killing.
22
Glorious_JoMar 28, 2026
+5
Which was complicated by his death sentence where they hung his head for shooting a lonely rider after drawing a bead on him to practice his aim.
5
AlgarothMar 28, 2026
+5
He also stole a ton of Cadillac parts.
5
Glorious_JoMar 28, 2026
+5
Man was such a menace that I heard he drank the devil's beer for NOTHING. Glad they caught him in the end.
5
kellzoneMar 29, 2026
+1
You mean Sue? I believe he threatened his father's life once in Gatlinburg, but after a mighty tussle, they worked things out.
1
dmcd0415Mar 28, 2026
+48
Gunrack was persecuted by police for his song about killing Darnell Simmons
48
takeme2tendieztownMar 28, 2026
+32
You mean on his album "I killed Darnell Simmons"?
32
shiverypeaksMar 28, 2026
+7
He was exonerated when his gf confessed though
7
obi_wan_kanerdyMar 28, 2026
+12
It was the bonus track that did him in.
12
WaffleliskMar 28, 2026
+2
If only he avoided Red Lobster
2
Master_Pollution_96Mar 28, 2026
+18
comparing this to bob marley and johnny cash is disengenous. throw his lyrics out and watch his jail interview. guy was a monster and he killed two innocent people. making this about lyrics is fucked up and muddying the waters
18
da_boopy_dayMar 28, 2026
+9
If he were actually connected to a crime it might have been. Don’t rap about crimes you commit.
9
geodebugMar 28, 2026
+9
Since a lot of you seem confused about this:
It turns out that for a murder case, lyrics alone aren’t enough. There actually has to be a murder.
9
rooster6662Mar 28, 2026
+1
Well yeah.
1
Friggin_GreaseMar 28, 2026
+4
Johnny Cash also shot Delia. Never had to answer for that either.
4
Seth_GeckoMar 28, 2026
+3
Those damned black-eyed peas...
3
aran_maybeMar 28, 2026
+2
I heard the drs used that one song to diagnose their mental incompetence
2
Seth_GeckoMar 28, 2026
+3
Okay wtf. I haven't heard this song played or mentioned for like 20 years, completely forgot it even existed, and then literally last night I was bbqing with the family, had some music on in the background, and Goodbye Earl comes on. None of us had heard it in years but instantly all of us were singing along at the top of our lungs for the entire 3 and a half minutes. It felt like stepping into a time machine. And then, the next morning I hop on listnook and here it is being mentioned again. Not once in 20 years and then twice in 24 hours. My brain hurts.
3
rooster6662Mar 28, 2026
+3
Personally, I think Earl probably got what was coming to him.
3
Potato_fortressMar 29, 2026
+1
I’m not even a pop country fan but if you don’t blast Earl or at least some Man! I Feel Like a Woman every once in a while I can promise that you’re doing your life a disservice.
1
RwillsaysMar 28, 2026
+14
Mfs in this thread acting like he was completely uninvolved in the crime.
14
Secure-Iron1202Mar 28, 2026
+8
Exactly . It was proven he did it . The lyrics only came out when they were determining his sentencing . And in the lyrics , there were SPECIFIC lines about crimes no one would know unless they had inside info or did it .
8
vegrynMar 28, 2026
+7
I don’t necessarily agree with the death penalty, and I know that it’s a hotly discussed point - rightfully so - in cases like these. But there is a big difference between advocating for an inmate’s death sentence to be commuted to life, versus advocating for the inmate’s innocence. Every death penalty case I’ve seen recently, much of the discussion tends towards the latter.
Doing my own research using direct source documents as well as articles from then and now, I don’t understand the push I’ve seen for this man’s innocence.
---
> … [Cummings and] Broadnax then took the train from Dallas to Garland to find someone to rob. As appellant and Broadnax walked around downtown Garland, they came across Stephen Swan and Matthew Butler who were standing outside a recording studio. Appellant and Broadnax talked to Swan and Butler about music and the record business for about thirty to forty-five minutes, and appellant and Broadnax walked away. By this time, it was past midnight, the trains and buses were no longer running, and appellant and Broadnax had no money and no way to get back to Dallas. They decided to go back and rob Swan and Butler and take Swan’s car. Appellant told Broadnax, who had the gun, that he might have to ‘pop’ them a few times, but Broadnax told appellant he did not want to do that. They decided appellant would distract the men by asking for a cigarette and Broadnax would pull out the gun to rob them. When they returned to the recording studio, Swan and Butler were still there. Appellant asked for a cigarette, and Broadnax pulled out the gun and fired two shots at Swan and four shots at Butler. As Swan lay on the ground bleeding to death, appellant went through Swan’s pockets and took his wallet and car keys. Appellant and Broadnax then drove away in Swan’s car, a Ford Crown Victoria. Swan and Butler died from their injuries.
> Appellant and Broadnax returned the handgun to its owner and the AK-47 to appellant’s aunt. They removed the Ford’s license plates and replaced them with plates from a Cadillac. After appellant pawned some tools they found in the car, they drove to Texarkana. In Texarkana, a police officer ran the license-plate number on the Ford through the computer and learned the plates were registered to a Cadillac. The officer performed a traffic stop and arrested appellant and Broadnax on outstanding misdemeanor warrants. When the officer entered the Ford’s VIN number on the computer, he learned the car was involved in a double homicide in Garland.
---
> After he was sentenced to death, he laughed at the mother of one of the victims during her victim's impact statement in court.
7
jonestownkid22Mar 28, 2026
+6
I live down the street from where this happened. Those two Christian producers were working with the church I use to attend.
The pastor was with them that night but was still in the building/house when it happened. Super sad all around bc that church did such a huge impact on outreach and helping the lesser.
6
BlazeKushrenadaMar 28, 2026
+1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
WaytogolarryMar 28, 2026
+3
Rap snitches, telling all they business, sit in the court and be they own star witness, do you see the perpetrator? Yeah I'm right here, f*** around get the whole label sent up for years
3
blackout-loudMar 28, 2026
+2
Even told on the Mexicans!
2
himanxkMar 28, 2026
+3
It seems like whether he pulled the trigger or his partner, they're both guilty of felony murder, and the lyrics were only used in sentencing, not in the verdict.
But also, the death penalty should be abolished.
3
UnstillwillMar 28, 2026
+5
Okay...
But did he actually kill two people?? Was it in self defense, or murder?
5
AppendixNMar 28, 2026
+21
He murdered two people during a robbery. It's unclear whether he pulled the trigger or his partner did, but under Texas law it's irrelevant, because they're both guilty of felony murder.
21
UnstillwillMar 28, 2026
+3
Oh yeah lock his ass up 😂😂
3
thevictor300Mar 29, 2026
+2
Okay what about young thug and Gunna? Someone please explain how they got out of the Rico case?
2
thevictor300Mar 29, 2026
+2
I would love if someone could break it down for me
2
Loretta_FabulousMar 28, 2026
+7
Using lyrics as evidence is a dangerous road... because where do you even draw the line between art and reality?
7
da_boopy_dayMar 28, 2026
+33
When the details of a song match a crime they’re being connected to. Like in the D4vid case or however you spell his name
33
djostreetMar 28, 2026
+26
The line is probably when an actual murder occurs
26
randomaccount178Mar 28, 2026
+7
The line is relevance and more probative then prejudicial. So pretty much no different then any other evidence.
7
onebandonesoundMar 28, 2026
+5
I think you draw the line at specific instances vs a propensity argument. If you talk about a specific instance of a crime in your lyrics, those lyrics should be admissible against you in a trial for that specific instance of crime, but lyrics should be inadmissible if they're just being used to argue that the lyricist is the type of person that would commit that type of crime.
For example, if Eminem is on trial for murder, the prosecutor should not be allowed to use his lyrics to argue that he's a violent person and therefore more likely to have done this violent crime. But if D4vd is on trial for the murder of that girl found in his car, and there's a lyric in one of his songs that describes something about the body that hasn't been publicly released, that lyric should be admissible against him.
5
Secure-Iron1202Mar 28, 2026
+6
People keep bringing up Johnny Cash singing about killing a sheriff, but that is not the same. Cash was telling a story and never actually hurt anyone. Broadnax’s lyrics were different because the court noted they contained real-life references to actual crimes he committed, including robbery and murder. The court was not punishing creativity. They used his own words to show intent, mindset, and the real danger he posed, which the jury needed to understand in a death penalty case.
6
drmehmetozMar 28, 2026
+24
This is where they’re drawing the line
https://preview.redd.it/rrzevo1r7urg1.jpeg?width=588&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e1d7c4ebd0a454dc23c5b75e948f59b70787ddc8
24
BallsackMcgeezyMar 28, 2026
+37
God this is stupid. He murdered two people.
37
SerHodorTheThrallMar 28, 2026
+2
> Those east-coast librul elites don't understand that in real America, we take justice into our own hands.
> We don't rely on others to fight our battles. Just two sweaty men, duking it out, shoving dicks in butts
2
ThatGoobMar 28, 2026
+2
Now thats what I call wrasslin
2
Gooch_DoctorMar 28, 2026
+3
Rest in piss
3
sitael13Mar 28, 2026
+2
Rap snitches, telling all their business
2
noleosisMar 28, 2026
+2
I think all rappers' lyrics should be admissible in court. Hypothetically, if there were a painter who killed someone and, in their home, were a bunch of paintings or drawling of murder or torcher or anything of the sort it would absolutely be used against them, and very well should be.
2
MajorPaper4169Mar 28, 2026
+1
So if I start rapping and make a song called “Immunity” does that mean I can commit any crime I want because I claim to have immunity in a song?
1
Friggin_GreaseMar 28, 2026
+9
You cracked the code
9
mountaindoomMar 28, 2026
+1
[hol up,uh uh, drop the beat drop the beat, the name's Gangstalicious](https://youtube.com/shorts/T--KfI88B0A?si=tygAHLhngsETWhmR)
1
ThePfeiffMar 28, 2026
+1
"Rap snitches, tellin' all their business. Sit in the courtroom and be their own star witness."
1
icebergslim3000Mar 28, 2026
+1
Texas will just take the opportunity to kill both of them
1
YAY04DEOMar 28, 2026
+1
That interview he did after from jail was some of the most cold blooded shit I’ve ever heard coming out of somebody’s mouth.
1
Agreeable_Error_8772Mar 28, 2026
+1
I’m out, apparently there was a nasty accident on 85 so traffic is fucked
1
FlaBeachyCheeksMar 28, 2026
+1
I remember watching a true crime show about a teenager who killed another teenager then he wrote a song, made a music video, about the crime, after the fact. He never stated who it was in the song but prosecutors didn't hesitate and obviously they had more evidence than just the lyrics but the mother of the victim wasn't against this. So this isn't the first and won't be the last. Also, the fact that the cousin waited to say something is not right to me.
1
Civil-Gene-2327Mar 28, 2026
+1
Didn’t say he didn’t do it though did they.
1
Sayello2urmother4meMar 28, 2026
+1
Who cares what Travis Scott thinks. What a shit person and musician
1
Shellymp3Mar 28, 2026
+1
Another one bites the dust
1
achillespatientMar 28, 2026
+1
If he was part of the crime he deserves the death penalty 🤷
1
JDweezyMar 28, 2026
+1
Ya out of everything going on the world this is the best cause we can get behind right now.
1
BeefSupremeTAMar 29, 2026
+1
And they are wrong. If you can write, record and/or release it, it can be used against you.
Maybe take up against the arse hole cousin who convinced him to take the rap.
1
_mully_Mar 29, 2026
+1
Hopefully no one gets the death penalty. ❤️
1
gmb0051Mar 29, 2026
+1
I’m pretty familiar with this case, really sad those guys died over like $3 in change. One of them still has some music up on YouTube too, very Beatles sounding. Was a very senseless circumstance.
1
punksnotbreadMar 29, 2026
+1
My only real take here is the death penalty is wrong
1
Accurize2Mar 29, 2026
+1
Wow…somehow these low IQ mf’ers keep failing upward to stardom. I guess it caught up with him after all. I have zero sympathy for his little plight. May his execution be swift and find justice for the victims’ families.
1
Perfect-Zebra-3611Mar 29, 2026
+1
I understand it but they picked 3 f****** terrible people to name as advocates lmao. Killer Mike is a fraud who preached against the machine and then decided to go against everything he said, TI is a creep as a husband and a father, and Travis literally has blood on his hands after Astroworld and hes just corny in general.
192 Comments