"Ok, you can have your precious blood. But, Christmas and birthdays are still only for the heathen masses!"
1681
ExoticWeaponMar 23, 2026
+261
Inb4 3026 “ok ok ok, birthdays are fine, but Christmas is off the table”
261
stereosalvationMar 23, 2026
+144
3026: "Ok you can upload your consciousness to the generational mothership to preach the word of Jehovah to other star systems centuries from now in your cloned bodies. But, you cannot, under any circumstances, celebrate Thanksgiving.....Yes, that includes Spacegivings too."
144
ChiiroMar 23, 2026
+141
I knew a girl who was a Jehovah's witness when I was in elementary school, every time we celebrated a holiday in class she looked miserable.
141
BalldersMar 23, 2026
+184
Dude it absolutely was miserable.
Every Halloween watching kids blasting through their candy that they got from trick-or-treating
Every Christmas watching kids show off the new cool stuff they got
Every birthday getting celebrated with cake and excitement.
I genuinely think my old man followed that religion so that he wouldn't have to be obligated to get gifts for anyone.
184
lotusblossom02Mar 23, 2026
+101
My father was a zealot elder and lead with an iron fist and belt.
Strength to all those who escape the horror.
101
BoolImAGhostMar 24, 2026
+14
Glad you made it out
14
Tank_Top_TerrorMar 23, 2026
+30
The only bright spot was people feel super bad and give you stuff. I developed a preference for almond joys because kids never wanted those and gave them to me on Halloween. Valentines was actually the best in school as a JW because everyone gave out Valentines and I had to sit in a corner, but I couldn’t stop them from dropping things on my desk. I’d get the most of everyone because they felt bad and I would just tell my mom I can’t stop people.
Christmas was the worst though, no wiggle room there.
30
Resident132Mar 23, 2026
+24
Lol same. My dad was always c**** and i could never shake the feeling he was a witness just to avoid presents.
24
tubthumping96Mar 23, 2026
+11
Lol, this. It's basically a humiliation ritual nothing they love more than suffering and if you have parents that are witnesses they are probably the worst at gifts and think their kids owe THEM for existing. THOSE type of people become followers of that religion. Also no windows in the Kingdom Hall is lunacy. Might as well be jail. Lol they might be right on some stuff and scriptures but it's a nah to all that other stuff.
Birthdays are nice, you can celebrate or not but I'm not the devil because I like cake and ice cream and some recognition. Christmas is also crazy to rally against because regardless if it's "pagan" in origins, that's not really the intent of it these days. That time of the year is usually a jolly, festive time of year, people seem to be a little happier and more giving. Those are GOOD traits to put out to the world. Lol WHY be against that. Even if it isn't technically Jesus exact birthdate, I feel like he would be pro that time of the year regardless as the holiday itself holds the spirit of Jesus in mind. It's all about giving. The message is right there. Do you get mad when people don't celebrate on your EXACT birthdate or are you cool having it a bit before or after or whenever you decide to celebrate your birthday. Not everybody does it on the EXACT date.
🙂
11
LudwigofthepotatopplMar 24, 2026
+20
It’s all calculated to make you feel like an outsider. Just like the proselytizing—the world turns you away, you feel bad, you go back to the cult where you feel at home.
20
ArktyusMar 23, 2026
+35
It was so bad. Not being able to do any of the arts and crafts associated with holidays really sucked. Everyone making their gingerbread houses and I’m just coloring…..
Everyone getting dressed up for Halloween and I’m wearing normal clothes.
No decorating Easter eggs
Couldn’t do the thanksgiving crafts
It really makes you feel like an outcast. The constant questions from the other students on why I couldn’t participate. The teacher always asking if I can/can’t do something.
Having to sit down during the pledge of allegiance.
This was in the 80s. When those holidays were a really big thing in school.
35
MbrenntMar 23, 2026
+12
> Having to sit down during the pledge of allegiance.
In hindsight I would have loved that but I can understand how everything else would make a kid feel extremely left out.
12
ArktyusMar 23, 2026
+11
Not that I wanted to do the pledge of allegiance. It was just everyday. Other kids looking and staring at me.
11
Broken_RealityMar 24, 2026
+10
You don't need a religion to refuse to stand or say the pledge of allegiance. It's your 1st amendment right to not say it.
10
LadyJRMar 23, 2026
+8
I’m a former preschool teacher. It was the opposite for us. We couldn’t celebrate anything so as to not exclude the JW kids.
8
Canibal-localMar 23, 2026
+12
Same with a coworker, I was in charge of decorating the office for the holidays and would always skip his desk. He was never part of any celebrations, just working at his desk while all of us ate cake.
12
emmsmumMar 23, 2026
+9
Same, we had two sister have to leave any celebration. Imagine celebrating being a it god. But yeah, now they looses rules on transfusions. What about all the dead moms and dads and kids? Religion is the biggest hoax
9
battleofflowersMar 23, 2026
+7
I had one once basically force me to give her a birthday present in secret. It was so sad.
7
ChiiroMar 23, 2026
+8
If I knew then what I knew now about Jehovah's witnesses I absolutely would have shared some of the candy I got with them.
8
battleofflowersMar 23, 2026
+5
My stepmom was an elementary school teacher and one year she had two JW kids in her class and that year they had a Fall Harvest Party and a Winter Celebration Party.
5
CasualRampagingBearMar 23, 2026
+3
We had the JW kids even not come to school if the class was having a holiday party. Remembrance Day assembly? They all went to the library and didn’t participate.
3
Successful-Winter237Mar 23, 2026
+29
One of the dumbest religions
29
bongophrogMar 23, 2026
+27
I never like denigrating other people’s religions, but the JWs actively pride themselves in looking down on and being ignorant of everyone else’s beliefs.
27
Successful-Winter237Mar 23, 2026
+19
All religions are misogynistic, racist and/or homophobic… degrade away
19
battleofflowersMar 23, 2026
+11
They're also uneducated and poor. If I am going to waste my Sunday going to church, I at the very least want to network.
11
doubleaxleMar 24, 2026
+3
Witnesses are the low middle class variety of cult.
3
Aun_El_ZenMar 23, 2026
+5
"Happy 'Day That Coincides With Your Expulsion From A Uterus'!"
5
TimothyMimeslayerMar 23, 2026
+3191
And in 2026, god changed his mind. To those who died before he changed his mind, his official statement was "lol"
3191
Mighty_moose45Mar 23, 2026
+587
This is actually very on brand, the Jehovah’s witnesses (and to a fair bit lesser extent Mormons) have a habit of sometimes changing church doctrine but writing in a way that makes it sound like this was always the church doctrine and then slowly but surely that morphs to de facto this was always the church’s doctrine and any writings that contradicts that are also slowly phased out. This aided through their publication called “The Watchtower” which is part magazine and part living religious text with comments on how the Bible should be interpreted and so on.
587
pyroniusMar 23, 2026
+197
Yeah. Part of their doctrine is that only those in charge are allowed to interpret the bible, and questioning that interpretation or interpreting it yourself is grounds for excommunication. I'm sure "reminding those in charge of a prior, conflicting interpretation" would also fall under "questioning" and be grounds for excommunication. At best you'd be told that it was *you* who misunderstood, and to just shut up and do as you're told
197
thetruemataMar 23, 2026
+83
You nailed it. The phrase will be "the faithful and discreet slave [their version of the pope/papacy] has been given new information by Jehovah."
I've not been a part of it for like 20 years but my family still is. I've had a beard for those whole 20 years and have got so much shit for it, well lo and behold like 5 or so years ago suddenly facial hair is acceptable. Guess who has beards now? I can only roll my eyes so far with them.
83
transcendental-apeMar 23, 2026
+120
“I believe that in 1976 god changed his mind about black people! I’m a Mormon. And Mormons just believe!”
One of the funniest musical lyrics of all time.
120
herehaveaname2Mar 24, 2026
+22
My kid put the anniversary of that date on our family calendar because the absurdity of god "changing his mind" makes him laugh.
22
CockRingKingMar 24, 2026
+19
The women are allowed to wear pants to meetings and now. I’m so mad thinking of all the days spent in the freezing cold going door to door (as a child) in a dress and pantyhose because we weren’t allowed to wear pants. Leaving at 18 was the best decision I ever made.
19
IAmBecomeTeemoMar 23, 2026
+27
We've always been at war with East Asia. Four legs good, two legs better.
27
ew73Mar 23, 2026
+8
"We have always been at war with Eastasia."
8
WhereasParticular867Mar 23, 2026
+58
Having grown up in a cult, questions about why God changed his mind will be answered with "he didn't, imperfect men who interpreted his will incorrectly did." That's how Mormons explain it when things change.
It's always God's will until it was a bad idea in hindsight. Then it was the fault of leaders who didn't meet God's standards. But He didn't remove those leaders and you're supposed to always obey them even if you believe they're wrong.
58
TyrroxMar 23, 2026
+72
It's not even all blood transfusions. They are only allowed to get their own blood transfused now. Still nothing from donors.
72
JAWinksMar 23, 2026
+41
So they should pre-emptively store blood in case they need a transfusion down the road? Or does it mean from outside the church?
41
Shotgun_MosquitoMar 23, 2026
+40
Yep, you can only get your own blood.
The prior doctrine was NO blood transfusion, even your own
40
No_Neighborhood7614Mar 23, 2026
+21
I believe blood portions was a grey area, plasma etc
Kids have died because their parents refused blood transfusions. In don't know why there haven't been more charges laid for neglect.
21
OwnCatch84Mar 23, 2026
+8
They changed the rules years ago to allowing "fractions" of blood
But still couldn't have red blood cells or white blood cells or plasma or platelets
You can separate the ingedients and have them but not the whole cake
And how do they get "fractions" when they are NOT ALLOWED TO DONATE BLOOD
8
SplendidPunkinButterMar 23, 2026
+101
And in 1978 God changed his mind about black people, according to LDS
101
bert_and_earnieMar 23, 2026
+12
Southern Baptists too.
12
PotentialRise7587Mar 23, 2026
+20
The no beards rule was especially stupid considering how many biblical figures, including Jesus, had beards
20
TimothyMimeslayerMar 23, 2026
+15
No alcohol is pretty weird too for evangelicals considering the wedding Jesus turned water to wine.
15
s-r-g-lMar 23, 2026
+9
12 year old Catholic me was *very* confused when they handed me a cup of grape juice at my friend’s nondenominational megachurch
9
rynthetynMar 23, 2026
+8
They're convinced that it wasn't wine, it was just really exceptionally good and fresh grape juice.
8
TimothyMimeslayerMar 23, 2026
+9
The story very blatantly makes it certain that isnt true.
9
P0Rt1ng4DutyMar 23, 2026
+34
And god looked down and said ''Oh shit, all of my followers are dying preventable deaths and nobody new is joining up. Guess medicine is okay now.''
34
Kindly-Job-4895Mar 23, 2026
+86
it was mostly kids
adults can choose for themselves to get life saving blood transfusions and deal with god later. children are easily sacrificed.
86
corrosivecanineMar 23, 2026
+46
Eh….I’m sure this happened but I worked in a hospital for a while and in situations like this the hospital would get a court order for emergency custody and they’d do the transfusion anyway (or whatever other lifesaving treatment was necessary when parents refuse on religious grounds). There was a situation at my hospital where a child with level 3 FGM was going septic and parents were absolutely refusing to let them remove the stitching on the labia. Hospital treated anyway and the family abandoned the kid.
46
nuixyMar 23, 2026
+18
That poor child. I hope they got the therapy and better life they deserved.
18
philosoraptocopterMar 23, 2026
+17
What a terrible day to be literate
17
LostInSpace-2245Mar 23, 2026
+7
They abandoned the child… wt actual F ..
And they claim “we are godly” I hope their is a god and they one day have to account for their actions…
7
BluesFan43Mar 23, 2026
+11
I had to look that up.
Incredible what some people will do to others.
Animals.
11
IAMA_Plumber-AMAMar 24, 2026
+3
The worst part is, they believe they're morally correct for doing that.
My f****** sister just died at 34 needing blood as a JW. I f****** HATE THIS GODDAMN CULT
28
OwnCatch84Mar 23, 2026
+9
I am so sorry
9
Elliot-S9Mar 23, 2026
+39
If God is real, he does indeed have a hell of a sense of humor.
39
d_smoghMar 23, 2026
+10
[If a creator god exists -- Stephen Fry](https://youtu.be/-suvkwNYSQo)
10
Beginning_Tour_9320Mar 23, 2026
+5
That’s just a rumour.
5
castafobeMar 23, 2026
+3
Yeah, my grandmother died in 2020 because she was so brainwashed by this cult. This makes me unbelievably angry because a simple transfusion almost certainly would have saved her life.
3
Johannes_PMar 24, 2026
+3
They did the same in the 1970s for organ transplantation, which they compared to cannibalism.
3
Lucius-HalthierMar 24, 2026
+3
“lol” god said to humanity suffering. “Lmao.”
3
thePsychonautDadMar 23, 2026
+4
That's the great part about made-up magical stories. The main character won't get out of the pages to smite you.
4
meleecowMar 23, 2026
+499
No one in here is mentioning how, You have to store your own blood in order to get it back. So if you have a traumatic injury and you're bleeding out if you haven't stored blood that month ... And mind you blood doesn't last that long even when separated.
You can only get your own blood back
499
steve_ampleMar 23, 2026
+137
Do take care to have your medical emergencies in reasonable proximity to the hospital storing your blood product within a reasonable timeframe since your donation.
Yeah, it's madness. Blood is more or less fungible, if equally typed. But perhaps it's the first free sample from the dealer to get the idea into one's veins to overcome the initial resistance. Give into this, you'll give into more, like allo donations.
137
wanna_be_docMar 23, 2026
+48
Yeah, this policy is meaningless.
A packet of packed red blood cells will last ~42 days refrigerated. A platelet donation will last 5 days. Fresh frozen plasma can last a year refrigerated. But this policy seems to imply that JWs will have to store whole blood to be transfused, and no hospital transfuses whole blood.
Nor is the local blood bank going to have capability to store and individual units of your own whole blood to be transfused back to you. Unless local JW churches are going to start banking their own members blood, but that definitely won’t be legal without proper permits and will quickly turn into a mess since they certainly won’t be able able to store or properly maintain blood products for the above reasons.
48
PollutionAway9782Mar 23, 2026
+38
its for surgery. i have had it done for myself because i have rare blood type
38
wanna_be_docMar 23, 2026
+12
Good point. That would probably be the only case where this could happen. But it would have to be for non-emergent cases.
And again, I don’t know if local blood banks are suddenly going to start holding otherwise normal blood for dozens of local JWs just for elective surgeries.
12
PollutionAway9782Mar 23, 2026
+12
yes but its for any elective surgery. we have a blood shortge sometimes so anything to help
12
steve_ampleMar 23, 2026
+8
Not to mention there are standardized time-between-donations for the donor's health's sake.
Whole Blood - 56 days (more for ladies, IIRC)
Platelets - 1 or 2 weeks
Plasma - 1 to 4 weeks
Jehova forbid, something happens between days 43 through 55. And showing up in the hospital for GSWs, auto accidents, stroke, aneurysms, chemo, liver disease, infections, allergic reactions, and anything else that require blood or products in volume. Either zero thought was put into this, or the leadership is confident the mindless sheep will remain so.
8
beegtunaMar 23, 2026
+14
God said if you use someone’s life savings blood you won’t get approved to live in the gated community in the sky smh
14
WrewdankMar 23, 2026
+14
They know that their followers and everybody else doesnt read the article, but if they word the headline correctly, they dont seem as stupid and evil. Maybe after this people will forget they had to sell their land to pay for them covering up all the child r*** they were trying to cover up.
14
phoenixmatrixMar 23, 2026
+3
Us, type 0 negative people, wondering what life is for everyone else.
3
CriticalandPragmaticMar 23, 2026
+4
Does Cell Saver count?
4
Slow_Watch_3730Mar 23, 2026
+4
No cell salvage has been a conscience matter already, most JWs would use it, but some still won’t.
4
Plantparty20Mar 24, 2026
+3
Sounds like a new business opportunity just opened up for the JW church
3
queerkidxxMar 24, 2026
+3
They actually can’t easily roll back the policy.
People have legitimately died for this. A lot of people. Imagine how angry you’d be if your husband or whatever *gave up his life* for the religion and they randomly ruled that actually, blood transfusions are fine .
3
FunWrangler666Mar 23, 2026
+287
So which high ranking leader needs a blood transfusion that triggered this?
287
TheDrunkDetectiveMar 23, 2026
+80
That or they are loosing too many followers and noticed this is a big issue people know about during recruiting or something?
80
foodieforthebootyMar 24, 2026
+21
2/3 of children raised in the cult leave it. They're draining money and followers. That's my take
21
beegtunaMar 23, 2026
+19
Member how much Fox News vilify the vaccine even though those pundits were the first to take it?
19
Plantparty20Mar 24, 2026
+14
My guess is a high ranking leader is investing in a blood bank for JWs
14
gonesoon7Mar 23, 2026
+103
I’m an anesthesiologist and these new restrictions are logistically extremely challenging. First of all, you can only do it if it’s a planned surgery, emergent/urgent surgery won’t allow time to do this. It also requires a hospital that allows these patients to 1) have this amount of blood drawn preoperatively and 2) store it for only them until their surgery date. None of this is an easy feat especially for smaller community hospitals.
103
Jevus_himselfMar 23, 2026
+60
I think it’s meant to simply save face with other JWs, get a regular blood transfusion and tell people at your Kingdom Hall you had some stored so they won’t judge you.
JW religion is mostly about looking like your doing the things they want, people lie all the time about hours preached or entertainment they avoid.
Source - grew up JW
60
RoarOfTheWorldsMar 24, 2026
+9
I really hope you’re right. I hate the idea of a mother dying leaving a window and a child with only one parent.
9
PassTheSevoMar 23, 2026
+17
lol in residency, I had a Jehovah’s Witness who was incarcerated for drug related chargers who refused blood for a cardiac case. Just found it ironic that god was okay with the crack and heroin, but don’t you dare put any of that BlOoD back in your body
17
BlackBlizzardMar 23, 2026
+63
They still can't take other people's blood.
>Jehovah's Witnesses has updated its policy on blood transfusions to allow members to have their own blood removed, stored, and "given back" in medical procedures.
63
no_infringe_meMar 23, 2026
+10
Hmmm. So was dialysis previously banned for JW?
10
Slow_Watch_3730Mar 23, 2026
+23
No, it was considered a closed system,
So an extension of the circulatory system. Same with cell salvage. Both were conscience decisions
23
Quackattack78Mar 23, 2026
+6
I think they’re allowed hemodialysis treatments or other treatments that circulate your blood continuously like ECMO
6
wulf_rkMar 23, 2026
+3
No it was not.
3
DTFlashMar 23, 2026
+167
So what part of the bible are they referencing? I don't recall Jesus giving his views on things that wouldn't be invented for 1600 years.
167
FireFright8142Mar 23, 2026
+118
They’re referencing the fact their members probably don’t like dying for no f****** reason
118
TyrroxMar 23, 2026
+30
This update still only allows them to get their own blood transfused back. No donor blood allowed.
30
Tank_Top_TerrorMar 24, 2026
+4
It’s a first step. Within 20 years they’ll roll it back completely. They have to do it slow as they have to wait for old literature to get lost and people’s memories to fade. This is always how they do this stuff. It also allows wiggle room for “misinterpretation “. Members will get blood transfusions, feign ignorance, and with the changes it’ll be blurry enough that the person won’t get excommunicated and just get a stern warning, saving them a member and potential lawsuit.
4
TCNZMar 23, 2026
+35
Nope, it's all about preventing lawsuits.
35
EBMille4Mar 23, 2026
+24
They should improve their approach to sexual abuse if they really want to improve on the lawsuit front
24
Septopuss7Mar 23, 2026
+11
They're still sitting on tens of thousands of statements about child abuse that they refuse to turn over to the authorities. You can Google "Jehovah's Witnesses" and "Australian Royal Commission" for the details but the tldr is that back in the 80s they published an article about CSA and their editor (a woman!) started receiving thousands upon thousands of accounts of child sex abuse and the Governing Body has ever since refused to turn it over. They're now soliciting donations for (insert fake reasons here) and then immediately turn around and use them to hire lawyers to fight and silence the victims. And lose. Repeatedly. They're going to go bankrupt at some point but they made a lot of money a few decades ago by selling their Kingdom Halls, built with donations and owned outright be each congregation, by tricking the congs into signing over ownership and then selling them and then making the congregations drive long distances to share Halls with neighboring congregations. It was a highly divisive moment in their history and they lost a lot of people after that. They also sold their headquarters building at 666 5th Ave in Manhattan to the Kushners. Then they moved to upstate NY where they are now setting up a media empire and have wound down their printing business, which is what this all started out as: a way to sell subscriptions and to MAKE MONEY.
11
Slow_Watch_3730Mar 23, 2026
+5
This ⬆️
5
optiplex9000Mar 23, 2026
+7
Even God fears being ruled against in a court of law. Some all powerful being he is
7
terminalzeroMar 23, 2026
+3
I was thinking there's a higher up who needed/has a kid that needed a blood transfusion
3
_Iro_Mar 23, 2026
+47
The Old Testament forbids the consumption of blood. It’s the same reason Jews have to drain the blood from an animal for it to be considered Kosher meat.
Jehovah’s Witnesses consider the transfusion of blood to be consumption, as it’s still technically being imbibed. This is why it’s banned.
47
ZifnabbanfizMar 23, 2026
+14
TIL imbibe can mean more than just eating and drinking. Thank you for that.
14
RavenmicraMar 23, 2026
+8
There is a bit more here to add to u/_Iro_ reply.
[https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/jehovahs-witnesses-why-no-blood-transfusions/](https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/jehovahs-witnesses-why-no-blood-transfusions/)
8
RavenmicraMar 23, 2026
+4
Thank you.
4
unclecaveman1Mar 23, 2026
+40
It’s about blood being sacred, and therefore taking it from someone else is sacrilegious. That’s pretty much it.
Was a JW from childhood until 16 or so.
40
tehvolcanicMar 23, 2026
+18
Even Jesus didn’t think blood was sacred. He just gave it away at dinner!
18
OwnCatch84Mar 23, 2026
+7
Great point...he encouraged drinking it symbolically
So does that mean you can physically drink it /s???
7
StochasticLifeMar 23, 2026
+5
It’s from part of the Nazarite vow that prohibits the eating of blood.
5
RavenmicraMar 23, 2026
+5
Offical WT answer here
[https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/jehovahs-witnesses-why-no-blood-transfusions/](https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/jehovahs-witnesses-why-no-blood-transfusions/)
5
roadsidefotoMar 23, 2026
+4
They base the teaching on a part of the Mosaic law that required the ancient Hebrews to dispose of the blood of sacrificial animals by pouring it out on the ground. They also acknowledge that modern day Christians aren't bound by Mosaic Law. But somehow that scripture means "true Christians" aren't allowed to have a life-saving blood transfusion. To do so, they say, would be a sin against God.
It plays into that cult's inbuilt martyrdom and persecution complexes.
4
excusethebloodMar 24, 2026
+20
I’m an exjw who had a medical emergency when I was 9. My mom was absolutely prepared to let me die rather than let me have a transfusion, she got in an argument with the nurses about it. If I had needed a transfusion to survive, I either would have died or the hospital would have taken temporary custody to give me the transfusion.
I wonder how many people died who would have been saved if this rule change had happened earlier.
20
misterbunnymuffinsMar 24, 2026
+5
I’m so sorry. I remember being forced to wear the “no blood” bracelet to school, hoping someone would intervene if it ever came to that.
P.S. username checks out lol
5
Ornery_Bath_8701Mar 24, 2026
+7
You're lucky.
My Jehovah's witness mother tried to kill my 3 siblings and I. Thank God the state stepped in and took us away from that situation.
7
smagussMar 23, 2026
+14
This is fairly standard for non-Jehovah's witnesses. Autologous are just units you had collected and tested and then directed towards yourself ahead of time. When you have a scheduled surgery for something like a hip replacement it is common to have autologous units on hand.
Life saving blood transfusions truly are medical miracles and the laboratory work that goes into every single transfusion, even emergency release, is done so fast that it is easy to overlook how complex it is and how accurate medicine and the associated laboratory methodologies have gotten.
All that aside. You do not want to have a transfusion unless you really need one. Every transfusion carries the risk of sensitization to blood group antigens. This is why cross match results expire. Your blood type, barring some pretty exceptional circumstances, does not change but your antibody screening results can change.
Units are screened and directed based on ABO/RH and antibody screen status. For patients requiring frequent transfusions, say someone with sickle cell anemia, they are likely to have common antibodies and special care is taken when selecting units. Units are often pre-screened and set aside and tagged as good units for sickle cell since they have been screened for the relevant antibodies.
The process of blood banking is amazing. All the way from the logistical and inventory management to the testing and transfusion.
I've taken some *very* broad strokes here.
Happy to talk more about it if anyone is interested.
Source: I was a Hematology and stem cell immunohistochemistry specialist in the lab.
14
HurlinVerminMar 23, 2026
+3
Thanks for the expert info. Very informative.
3
love2goMar 23, 2026
+11
When I was in school, a JW family refused to allow the blood transfusion for their child who was dying without it. After a court order against them, they snuck onto the pediatric floor to swipe the child only to be met and arrested by police stationed just for this. They would rather have a dead child. Crazy
11
MultiMillionMilerMar 24, 2026
+3
Psychos, who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near kids let alone raising them..
3
danny12bejeMar 24, 2026
+10
I assume one powerful JW needs a blood transfusion?
10
steve_ampleMar 23, 2026
+48
They previously relaxed rules on beards, ladies' dresses, higher education, and superficially lightened up on shunning. But this - despite the many glaring holes and lack of thought - is one where there is a body count. It's hard to do even a symbolic about-turn when people have chosen to die over the original hardline doctrine, and unnecessarily at that.
Oh, and of course, the course correction comes without apology.
JWs be getting desperate.
48
Lonely_NoyaaaMar 23, 2026
+36
>The change reflects evolving understanding of medical ethics and member welfare, according to church leadership.
Translation: they got tired of being sued and dealing with bad PR from preventable deaths. Religious doctrine evolving to match medical reality is good, but it shouldn't have taken this long when lives were at stake.
36
ryo3000Mar 23, 2026
+17
Proposed translation number 2: Someone in the cult leadership needs or will need a blood transfusion soon
Easier to say "Oh yeah it's my own blood haha"
17
Slow_Watch_3730Mar 23, 2026
+9
They’re tired of mounting government pressure in Europe and Japan. These inquiries are exposing that they are a High Control Religion that hurt families and dictates lives.
9
RubiesNotDiamondsMar 24, 2026
+7
“New Light”. Someone on the Watchtower must need surgery.
7
roadsidefotoMar 23, 2026
+36
Ex JW here. Absolutely *f**** these monsters. The people running that religion have been teaching children - CHILDREN - that God wants them to refuse blood transfusions and die to prove their faith. Thousands of people, including children, have died over the last several decades because of the JW's ridiculous, barbaric No Blood policy, which until last week forbade even storing ones own blood for future transfusion. Now they've decided their God is okay with it suddenly. This is nothing but ass-cover for legal reasons.
And if any current JWs show up and claim I'm lying, which won't surprise me in the least: I have receipts from your own overlords.
36
MrBoWigglyMar 23, 2026
+5
How very 19th century of them. Next, they'll allow the Edison's Devil's Candle in their homes!
5
SbatioMar 23, 2026
+18
Those people who let their kids die before the rule change must be piiiiisssssed!
18
DrSupraneMar 23, 2026
+4
They were never allowed to refuse transfusion for children. We'd go to court to get an order if needed.
4
skunkabilly1313Mar 23, 2026
+11
As someone who grew up in the religion, they absolutely would fight that. I knew of both people that won, and some who lost to the state, and it all but ruined the parents lives thinking their child was now tainted by blood
11
ItsPronouncedSatanMar 24, 2026
+4
That wasn't always the case. Many children have absolutely died because the court either couldn't or wouldn't intervene in time.
4
P0Rt1ng4DutyMar 23, 2026
+20
When nobody is joining your cult you have to let your existing members survive easily avoidable deaths.
20
HTIRDUDTEHNMar 23, 2026
+6
My grandmother died from a plethora of diabetes related issues but what finally did her in was refusing blood when she contracted sepsis because of her JW ways.
As if the Kingdom Halls and book studies weren't torture enough.
6
TheTrubMar 23, 2026
+3
My mom lost a patient who was a JW because she (and eventually the patient’s husband after she lost consciousness) kept refusing blood transfusions during a complicated birth. It was Christmas Eve. My mom was in a bad funk for a month or two after that.
3
Titleduck123Mar 23, 2026
+11
F*** them. They almost killed me with this shit 30 years ago.
11
KimJongFunkMar 23, 2026
+13
Someone high up in the church must have needed a surgery.
13
Fickle_Competition33Mar 23, 2026
+5
That's how religions split into 2 variants. Like Sunni and Shia, Orthodox and Reformists. Society behaves mich like genetics mutation and natural selection.
5
bmwkidMar 23, 2026
+9
The fact that children who have no capacity to know or understand whether or not they want to be a part of JW die because of these rules is one of the most evil practices of any religion or faith
9
SwiftravenMar 24, 2026
+8
F*** that cult with a cactus.
Their moronic views on blood transfusions directly led to the death of my uncle.
Then the b**** he was married to, who was the JW, started stripping. Like b****, you let him die due to your religion but this is what you decide to go against it with?
Hopefully she got run over by a bus.
8
GotMoFansMar 23, 2026
+14
The blood transfusion rule indirectly killed Prince.
He needed a hip replacement but couldn’t do it as a JW. He needed pain killers. He became addicted to opioids.
14
Sunlit53Mar 23, 2026
+8
My sister was a jdub, who skipped a c-section despite her kid’s really big head and insisted on a vaginal delivery. Kid took two days plus forceps and birth injuries to both mother and kid to get him out alive. Jury’s out on why he’s now 6 and still not talking, but sister and husband are no longer jdubs.
8
GetsBetterAfterAFewMar 23, 2026
+27
Imagine being a groomed child of Jehovahs witness parents going around everyday wondering why youre parents have such wacky ass beliefs and your only answer is "because God said so!"
Religion is a f****** scourge akin to plagues and war which is ironic because Israel is waging war all over the place cause "god told them to!"
One day we will shed this husk that has held back humanity for 1000s of years, wish I could live to see that day.
27
AldarionnMar 23, 2026
+10
It won't happen over night, but the religious communities HAVE been shrinking year over year. This happens naturally as societies gain access to proper education systems and social programs, which help influence younger generations to break indoctrination cycles. It takes decades, not years.
Of course here in the US we are backsliding in a lot of areas. The evangelical right has long lobbied against the department of education standardizing schools, especially in red states, and have constantly pushed for biblical teachings as core curriculum. That sort of thing has to be shut down if we don't want a return to the dark ages.
We could start by IMMEDIATELY revoking the tax exempt status of churches and religious organizations and make them pay taxes DIRECTLY into the Department of Edication, and use those funds to modernize secular curriculum nationwide. We could provide national oversight for major churches, prosecute pedophile priests, and audit any business with church affiliation or funding. We could do a lot of things if people show up to the polls.
You and I might not live to see the downfall of major religion, but our children and grandchildren could. Assuming we can claw back any sort of power from this administration any time soon.
10
Titleduck123Mar 23, 2026
+11
I don't have to imagine, I was that groomed child.
And now I'm an atheist who happily gave her daughter blood when she need it to save her life.
11
NosethatknowsMar 23, 2026
+5
I've watched 3 JW die from intestinal bleeds in 2 months on ICU rotations. All families caved at the last minute and wanted a transfusion to save thier family; , the patients did not, but after 48 hours of bleeding they really weren't in the best mind set to make decisions. They just wanted to sleep.
5
kuromonoMar 23, 2026
+4
So now every death from these previous restrictions just became twice as pointless.
This is a good move, but it only shows the evil that is at the root of JWs.
4
Texas12thManMar 24, 2026
+4
JW’s believe only 144,000 go to heaven to sit at the right hand of God and the remaining stay here on a renewed earth. Article says they have 144,000 active members in the UK. Maybe God’s chosen are all in the UK right now? That’d be interesting.
4
EchoRush93Mar 24, 2026
+4
Oh, now you change the f****** rules? F*** off.
4
mypostisbadMar 23, 2026
+7
Transfusions still not allowed, however is some blood just, somehow falls into you, that can't be helped
7
El_Superbeasto76Mar 23, 2026
+7
This is what kept Prince from getting much needed hip surgery.
7
Formal-Radish1413Mar 23, 2026
+9
So they all realized that forcing people to die from things surgery could fix easily would keep their numbers from dropping?
9
Muffled_IncineratorMar 23, 2026
+8
That was what got me into a huge fight w/ my ex, a JW who was not really that into the church when we met. Years later, as she devolved back intot he church, I was like, without a transfusion or ten, I would have DIED as a baby. She didn't care, and didn't seem to have a problem with this, and it was one of many reasons we're not together anymore.
8
Blue_DewMar 23, 2026
+7
My neighbors were Jehovah's Witnesses and I was friends with them. Their mom posted on Facebook one day that she was diagnosed with leukemia. A little under a week later she posted how it was difficult to treat her due to her religious beliefs on blood transfusions and two days later she passed away. The entire family dropped the religion almost immediately after that.
7
DM_Me_Corgi_ButtsMar 23, 2026
+3
That's good, always hard to keep these people are alive when their hemoglobin is low and they're at risk of bleeding to death.
3
melancholy_doodMar 23, 2026
+3
Yeah, but what about all Jehovah Witnesses who perished under the old rule?…
3
oldcreakerMar 24, 2026
+3
But I thought these were God's rules - did he say something?
3
MultiMillionMilerMar 24, 2026
+3
https://childrenshealthcare.org/
Medical neglect for "religious reasons". Not just this religion or specific medical treatment, letting kids suffer and/or die unnecessary horrible deaths from treatable conditions is still f****** legal in over half the country. Psychotic deranged lunacy and an egregious neglect of childrens basic human rights.
3
andcirclejerkMar 24, 2026
+3
I'd had a lovely transufion and all I'd said to my wife was 'that O negative was good enough for Jehova'
3
TheGreatGoukiMar 24, 2026
+3
Selena died because she needed a transfusion and her father wouldn’t let it happen.
3
cool_arrrowMar 24, 2026
+3
Wow, imagine that. My grandmother died because of they didn’t allow her a transfusion. Wrecked my life.
3
InsomniaticWandererMar 24, 2026
+3
Crazy how "god" just up and changed his mind all of a sudden.
3
formerNPCMar 24, 2026
+3
I had a coworker who was a Jehovah witness and she died at 36 because she refused a blood transfusion that would have saved her life. How does this make sense!
3
dijonazeMar 24, 2026
+3
I’m sure the organization is having a membership problem, so they’ve been loosening restrictions on its members in order to appear like they’re being “progressive”. Don’t be fooled, it’s still a cult.
I’ve seen shunning practices in person and they will not even speak your name if you’ve gone against the organization, it’s deplorable.
3
RedseveMar 23, 2026
+6
God changed his mind huh?
6
ImaginaryMedia5835Mar 23, 2026
+5
This is the shit that pisses me off about religion. It either is allowed or it isn’t. I don’t think the religious books/teachings say you can’t do these things until such time as you hemorrhage membership so it more convenient to allow more stuff that used to be sacrilege.
5
KrazyBby93Mar 24, 2026
+6
What higher up needs one?
6
ThoughtfulInhibitorMar 23, 2026
+5
Oh man luckily their fake rules can be changed.
5
Tiny-Albatross518Mar 23, 2026
+4
This used to be the dumbest possible way to die.
Looks like Pentecostal snake handlers are moving back into the number 1 s***.
4
Awkward_Bison_267Mar 23, 2026
+4
I wish they had changed this before Prince died of an overdose caused by hip pain he wasn’t allowed to fix with surgery.
4
CosmoBiologistMar 23, 2026
+4
I have literally had family members die over this stupid rule
4
CallRespiratoryMar 23, 2026
+3
Guess they've finally seen enough members die from treatable illness and injury.
3
KulbanMar 23, 2026
+4
It's always interesting when an eternal being, whose knowledge and wisdom is infinite, gives a... not just a rule... but a commandment that people should follow. And then decides to change their mind after a few decades or centuries. A timeframe that is a mere mosquito heartbeat to them.
4
shoulda-known-betterMar 23, 2026
+4
Imagine being someone whos already lost someone because of this and now humans can just say oh ugh we don't believe that anymore
4
Reasonable-Turn-5940Mar 23, 2026
+4
Can they just do that? Do they have to check with God first? Get something in writing from him that this is cool? Even put it in an email so there's a paper trail.
4
sweet-n-soursauceMar 23, 2026
+3
Ah. Only 20 years after my grandfather died because my grandmother wouldn’t allow him to receive one.
3
ErathenMar 23, 2026
+6
Wait what?
Jehovah's witnesses couldn't have blood transfusions?
Lmaooo
6
TyrroxMar 23, 2026
+4
Yeah they take a couple lines talking about not consuming blood and abstaining from blood as not being allowed transfusions.
Even now, this is just letting them get infusions of their own blood. Still not allowed from others.
4
ErathenMar 23, 2026
+5
Wow...
So when they're in an accident and suffer massive blood loss? Or require a major surgery necessitating transfusions?
They just die because god said so?
Religious people are so weird
5
TyrroxMar 23, 2026
+4
There are some synthetic alternatives on the market for red blood cells, and they can still take fluids to help replace the lost volume. But still a far cry from whole blood.
That, and surgeons have to spend a lot more time on hemostasis.
4
Slow_Watch_3730Mar 23, 2026
+6
Technically still can’t unless it’s
Their own blood.
6
ErathenMar 23, 2026
+3
So they would need to store blood every 42 days to maintain a blood reserve, or they risk dying during any major surgery or accident
Insane... Insane that this is forced upon kids too
3
Slow_Watch_3730Mar 23, 2026
+3
Yeah, that’s right. In most countries, courts will authorize blood transfusions for minors when necessary. But there have still been cases where children have died, and each year some teenagers in the U.S. and elsewhere go to court themselves to fight for the right to refuse blood.
In some situations, children have even had to rely on hospital staff to seek court orders on their behalf to override that decision. What makes this especially significant is that if a Jehovah’s Witness accepts blood or allows their child to receive it without taking a stand then they can be considered “disassociated”, which often results in being shunned and losing their entire community.
3
Dazzling_Scallion277Mar 23, 2026
+7
I wonder how Selena’s family feels
7
corrosivecanineMar 23, 2026
+5
Did God change his mind?
5
AntiYourOpinionMar 23, 2026
+5
As someone who’s watch many of these people die for their religious beliefs this is disappointing.
5
Knightrider319Mar 23, 2026
+2
They’re okay getting bovine blood aka Hemopure
2
BananasPineapple05Mar 23, 2026
+2
In case anyone didn't know, "blood transfusions" cover a whole lot of "blood products," some of which (like plasma) wouldn't even qualify under the JW rules. The ban on accepting blood transfusions by the JW sect is another instance of where the performance of a faith has replaced the experience of it.
2
three-senseMar 23, 2026
+2
The headline I was waiting for today
2
SylversMar 23, 2026
+2
"Sire, we're running out of Jehovah's Witnesses faster than we can replace them."
"Curses."
2
alana_sheeMar 23, 2026
+2
No matter what, glad to hear it
2
woo-hoo-Mar 23, 2026
+2
The article claims there are 144,000 members in the UK. That’s a famous number in Christianity. Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that only 144,000 people will make it to heaven and the rest of the faithful will remain on earth but it will be a paradise.
2
Complete_EntryMar 24, 2026
+2
"Eases" like it ever made f****** sense.
2
DanielMcLauryMar 24, 2026
+2
So they've "changed the rules" in a way that has very minimal actual practical application, but probably allows them to get around some (objectively correct) ruling that they are a death cult that should have their children taken away from them.
Any "religion" that teaches children they need to martyr themselves for it needs to be shut down. Freedom of religion should mean the freedom to choose your *own* religion, not the freedom to force your kids into some crazy religion.
2
Stropi-wanMar 24, 2026
+2
I suspect declining membership numbers is causing it. I think that sometimes churches will tweak their beliefs a bit when membership is going down.
200 Comments