· 56 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 10, 2026 at 5:32 PM

Jenna Ortega Recalls Auditioning for Hereditary When She Was 12

Posted by peoplemagazine



🚩 Report this post

56 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
WakeNikis 3 days ago +364
Buccal fat removal is a scourge upon humanity, and the sooner it’s gone the better.
364
chantsnone 2 days ago +160
I’m getting buccal implants. I’m going full cherub.
160
B00G3R 2 days ago +45
Whether she did or not I don’t care much but my cheeks look like that after I started getting regular Botox treatment for TMJ. My jaw muscles reduced in size and my cheek bones are much more prominent. When my weight fluctuates on the lower side, my cheeks are hollow like hers.
45
GudgerCollegeAlumnus 2 days ago +27
I was not expecting to get into this conversation here, but did that help? I tried that a couple times and it did nothing so I had to see a specialist and get the most expensive splint known to man.
27
softsharks 2 days ago +13
Botox helps my TMJ soooo much
13
FelineSoLazy 2 days ago +4
Happy cake day!
4
softsharks 2 days ago +4
Thanks!
4
acrobaticpussy 1 day ago +1
Do you think it gave you jowls at all? I’m scared since my cheeks are big, shrinking my jaw muscle will make them sag. 
1
softsharks 19 hr ago +2
No jowls! I think the muscles shrank gradually enough that it didn't cause any any sagging skin, but my jaw is naturally very small.
2
Different-Eagle-612 2 days ago +8
TMJ botox helped me so much more than those appliances ever did
8
GudgerCollegeAlumnus 2 days ago +2
Other way around for me.
2
Different-Eagle-612 2 days ago +3
yeah sorry i did figure from your comment, i was just trying to answer the question as best as i could. it helps that my place was really good at TMJ botox. they would hit several spots in that muscle and then they went a bit into the temple area as well
3
MrTwoPumpChump 2 days ago +25
It’s lighting and makeup. She doesn’t look like that side profile or on normal light. That’s Hollywood baby
25
OneSeaworthiness7768 2 days ago +26
I just looked up other recent photos to see the difference. I really don’t think it’s just makeup and lighting.
26
____mynameis____ 2 days ago +16
She has always been quite guant. I think people wrongly analyse every guant look as buccal fat removal when most of it is weight loss, harsh makeup and sucking in ur cheeks while posing. + occasionally cheek fillers creating that illusion People were swearing Miley Cyrus did it but when she showed up for that Hannah Montana anniversary segment, she was looking not that different from her old self. A lot of these actresses look totally fine in their movies with more simple makeup(Sophie Turner, even Anya Taylor Joy)
16
First-Business-5797 2 days ago +2
I think a lot of it is people just knowing her from Wednesday, where she was 1. A lot younger and 2. Made up and shot to look even younger than she was
2
redthehaze 2 days ago +4
Dont forget aging. Im in my late 30s and have been losing buccal fat despite being considered overweight.
4
CheapEater101 1 day ago +2
Jenna is in her early 20s though
2
oh_please_god_no 2 days ago +7
It’s just contouring makeup
7
OnlyTemperature4911 2 days ago +11
Some people are just gaunt babe
11
_discordantsystem_ 2 days ago +7
NO! We must comment negatively about women's bodies NO MATTER how irrelevant it is to the topic! I'm getting really sick of people thinking it's cool and progressive to constantly talk shit about women regardless of the circumstance.
7
OnlyTemperature4911 2 days ago +6
I’m just so especially sick of all these people who heard the term “buccal fat removal” like 5 minutes ago say it about every woman in Hollywood.
6
Zedris 2 days ago +1
Oh you poor child
1
redjessa 2 days ago +7
That is makeup. Also, Jenna Ortega is tiny and has never had a round face. Look at photos of her as a kid. It's just makeup.
7
arealhumannotabot 2 days ago +2
I’ve seen stills of her as a young teen and her face looks basically the same aside from younger
2
Heyplaguedoctor 1 day ago +1
I don’t understand why so many trends are “dying is fashionable”. Oldest example I can think of is tuberculosis but I’m sure it goes back further than that (Idk if she actually had that procedure or not, nor is it any of my business. On the bright side, I’m gaunt from illness so I guess I’m finally trendy?)
1
Smooth-Solution-716 3 days ago -12
Its confirmed she never did any. It is just bleached brows, just look at her recent red carpet with non-bleached brows
-12
WakeNikis 3 days ago +21
Look at her cheeks in that photo and then look at her Cheeks in the first Wednesday movie.  Last time I checked, bleaching your brows doesn’t make your cheeks gaunt
21
Smooth-Solution-716 2 days ago +6
Look at her cheeks now and look at her child actress pictures. Or red carpets after season 1 of Wednesday aired. No difference
6
lueur-d-espoir 2 days ago +2
Women lose fat in their faces naturally as they age. Some more so than others so we cant always tell.
2
BrooklynLivesMatter 2 days ago +25
She's only 23!
25
DirtzMaGertz 2 days ago +21
I would say it's pretty rare for a 23 year olds face to change that drastically naturally 
21
albertsheinstein 2 days ago
If you lose weight the fat in your cheeks would reduce. The same thing is happening to my face right now.
0
DirtzMaGertz 2 days ago +2
I mean c'mon. She's always been thin and her cheeks and jaw line did not look like that.  
2
albertsheinstein 2 days ago
Yeah but someone can appear thin but have a higher body fat percentage. I actually looked thin but my body fat percentage was like 25% so it’s possible
0
Filibust 2 days ago -1
Srsly. She was so cute before.
-1
Material-Brief-8114 2 days ago -4
She was 12. 
-4
Filibust 2 days ago +3
…..I was talking about how she looked only a year ago…..
3
Material-Brief-8114 2 days ago +4
There's a very informative post on IG that I saw where a fan did a comparison of her facial structure from 2023 to today useing existing photos with similar angles and lightning. It hasn't changed. Her styling and makup has though. Alot of people who compare photos use images that are different angles significantly different ages, and usually smiling vs not smiling. 
4
tinyrickstinyhands 2 days ago
Being an ignorant twit is far worse yet here you are
0
WakeNikis 2 days ago +2
Tough but fair.
2
Immediate-Tutor8672 2 days ago +8
Thank god they cast correctly.
8
peoplemagazine 3 days ago +40
TLDR: Jenna Ortega once auditioned for one of the scariest horror movies of the lat 10 years. Ortega, 23, told Kid Cudi on an episode of the Wave Original podcast *Big Bro with Kid Cudi* released on Thursday, April 9 that she auditioned for the 2018 horror film *Hereditary* as a child and could sense the movie would be a hit. "Some things I just think, 'Okay, well whatever suits the project best.' I do remember — I didn't understand it, when I came in — but I think I auditioned for *Hereditary*, which obviously \[I\] wouldn't have made any sense for, especially my disposition as a kid," Ortega said when Cudi, 42, asked her to name a movie she almost starred in.
40
2099AD 2 days ago +27
It's okay; *Hereditary* >!isn't a role to lose one's head over!< Edited to add spoiler tags. The movie's 8 years old, but... eh.
27
TonyTobak 2 days ago -14
Midsommar is way better imo
-14
Other-Emu1829 2 days ago +8
2 different stories. Why do they need to be compared.
8
Yourfakerealdad 2 days ago +3
For real lol also what a random ass thing to say when literally nobody brought it up
3
TonyTobak 2 days ago +1
Same instructor and the other guy said Hereditary wasn’t a role to lose one’s head over, and I only just now realized it was a joke about that scene lol
1
k2nxx 2 days ago +14
wtf is she doing to herself wtf
14
Altruistic-Potatoes 2 days ago +20
Now she can audition for Uncle Fester
20
Traditional_Fox7696 2 days ago +1
I see the resemblance
1
BeanieMcChimp 2 days ago -11
This is fascinating! I need more stories like this! People Magazine is killing it with these earth shattering scoops!
-11
arealhumannotabot 2 days ago +25
Um do people know they’re in an entrainment sub? This isn’t the place for hard journalism
25
andy4775 2 days ago +9
That person you're replying to is a dodo brain but they haven't realized it yet. They may never even realize it.
9
pharaohsanders 2 days ago -7
This article is in the news feed.
-7
BeanieMcChimp 2 days ago -13
It’s not a spam spot for advertisers like People Magazine, and when it comes to entertainment news there’s interesting and entertaining material to post or fluffy dribble like this. I’d prefer less fluffy dribble. But hey if you’re into advertisers like People taking over the sub to drive eyeballs to their garbage publication then you do you.
-13
← Back to Board