\* they asked for the the dossiers of Jewish and Jew related employee to check if there's a pattern in the systemic antisemtism that was reported on that firm.
If I had to bet, someone in HR tryed to put that under the rug for some reasons, and Justice is asking to do it themselves because they saw HR was putting that under the rug.
God damn clickbait title.
EDIT: seriously guys ? Did we read the same article ?
-25
immutateApr 1, 2026
+21
You don’t need to compile information _about_ Jews to find out if we’re experiencing antisemitism, you need information _from_ Jewish people.
21
Canadiangoosedem0nApr 1, 2026
+1
Bingo.
1
Skipspik2Apr 1, 2026
+1
That is....exactly what they are doing ?
EDIT: Not point arguing, I won't read the answer anymore, I'm just leaving the message I posted for people that wants to read it.
1
immutateApr 1, 2026
+1
No, it isn’t. They’re asking to specifically “create lists of Jewish faculty and staff, and to provide personal contact information.” That’s gathering information _about_ Jewish folks without their consent.
1
Skipspik2Apr 1, 2026
+1
Like it or not, it is allowed in the local law. For a judge or a judge designated person.
Same thing as comparing salary per ethnicity or comparing life style per gender.
I will grant you that with the current administration that could be exploited very badly.
I'm just reading a judge saying "hey HR, you put antismetism under the rug, so give me back all dossiers"
1
Pump_and_MagdumpApr 1, 2026
+24
No, they're trying not to give a list of Jewish people to a regime that was funded by a man who threw Nazi salutes at the f****** inauguration.
Defending Nazi shit by pretending to be ignorant of Nazi shit is not impressive or going to fool anybody. We all see what you are doing and you damn yourself by doing it.
24
Skipspik2Apr 1, 2026
+1
Thank you comparing me to "nazi shit" I guess.
I will keep the fine I had for actually beating someone making a nazi salute a few years ago as a badge of honor.
1
Pump_and_MagdumpApr 1, 2026
+1
You expect me to believe that shit when you are defending a Nazi regime right now? That would require me to be brain dead. Stop projecting.
1
Skipspik2Apr 1, 2026
+1
Please watch any of my post history and check. Nowhere did I.
I tend to react badly when called Nazi. Though I am dumb enough to trust listnook mods on your behavior.
EDIT;
Ah.
"Comment deleted by user"
Well, I've let mine if people wanna read.
1
Skipspik2Apr 1, 2026
-10
...The hell ?
-10
SminahinApr 1, 2026
+13
Are you kidding me? How on Earth does that make it okay, and also why do you have so much completely unearned trust in the the Nazi wannabes' intent in gathering lists of Jews--or any ethnicity/demographic.
If you heard Miller were gathering lists of all the gay or trans people on campus, would you be like "seems legit"?
13
iymcoolApr 1, 2026
-17
Agreed, the headline is wildly ridiculous (and is doing its job well). While it's nice to hear that there's some federal interest in combating antisemitism, at least at an academic level, it's odd to mention the organization affiliation and then specifically mention three organizations that weren't being listed.
-17
Mixer-3007Apr 1, 2026
+22
so combating antisemitism with making lists of Jews... I see.
22
NYPizzaNoCharApr 1, 2026
+1
C'mon... without that list, how will the feds know who to send the mandatory yellow star patches to?
1
Skipspik2Apr 1, 2026
+1
It seems only the two of us read the article or the article changed betwen you and I reading it and the rest of it.
Or bots.
At that point I don't really care.
Article says - or said - that Judge designed someone that then asked for the dossiers of the Jewish and Jew related people to check if the antisemitism on the company had some pattern.
You could debate how legitimate the fact of making a list is, though it is legally allowed and it will not be publish. Granted, with the current administration it could be an issue.
16 Comments