Nice to figure that out over three months after Corporation for Public Broadcasting dissolved.
[https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2026/01/07/are-pbs-npr-shutting-down-corporation-public-broadcasting/88046403007/](https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2026/01/07/are-pbs-npr-shutting-down-corporation-public-broadcasting/88046403007/)
6887
GriffinFlashMar 31, 2026
+4230
his illegal orders are causing so much irreparable damage as people twiddle their thumbs waiting to eventually get around to challenging them.
4230
Suro_AtirosMar 31, 2026
+1259
so much irreparable damage that's making tens of millions of Trump supporters extremely happy. to them, it's like Christmas every day, they've never been so happy.
1259
-wnr-Mar 31, 2026
+575
Remember, empathy is a sin to them. Big Bird and Mr Rogers had to go.
575
cwk415Mar 31, 2026
+350
Also cancer research funding, because, *reasons.*
350
AstarteHilzarieMar 31, 2026
+175
Cancer is punishment from God for living a sinful life and big pharma just wants to torture you and take your money with their "treatment". Live a Godly life and eat toxin-free non-GMO food and take MLM supplements and you will never have to worry about cancer "research."
Unless it happens to me or someone I love, then you should pray for us and donate to our givesendgo or whatever the Godly crowdfun platform is these days.
(/S unfortunately required.)
175
moldy-scrotum-soupMar 31, 2026
+96
Those conservative pieces of shit basically said the same thing about HIV research.
96
AppropriateTouchingMar 31, 2026
+81
They literally did. They let it run rampant because they thought it only effected "undesirables"
81
GearOk7360Mar 31, 2026
+62
Another reason to piss on Reagan's grave.
62
AppropriateTouchingApr 1, 2026
+8
Like we even need another. Theres so many to choose from already.
8
MagicalUnicornFartApr 1, 2026
+14
...and, people still hate the D's, and can't vote for a black lady promising legal weed.
anyone that didn't show up to vote against this evil shit is a piece of shit in my book.
silence is complicty with what was on the ballot
14
BeyondElectricDreamsMar 31, 2026
+31
> Unless it happens to me or someone I love, then you should pray for us and donate to our givesendgo or whatever the Godly crowdfun platform is these days.
Oh, oh, or
"I trust the doctor to administer almost any treatment when I'm sick" but the moment it's trans healthcare suddenly "THEY'RE QUACKS WHO ARE WOKE AND ARE CORRUPTING OUR YOUTH"
31
AlhazraeIIcMar 31, 2026
+18
Or take the route of my mom:
Trust your doctor until he tells you to quit smoking, then it's "he has no idea what he's talking about."
18
scorpyo72Mar 31, 2026
+12
I know you /s'd, and it was right and good. However, I want to gift you knowledge gifted to me by watching NDT: throughout history, human beings have been eating organic foods, and yet modern humans have measurably longer lifespans.
12
clash_by_nightMar 31, 2026
+18
Well, I mean organic food is good and well, but it's not gonna save you from sepsis, or freezing to death, or getting mauled by a wild boar, or, hell, simply not having enough of it. Modern technology will, though.
18
OppressedCow6148Apr 1, 2026
+14
When I see comments like this I get so enraged. You can eat as healthy as you want, workout every day, if illness wants to befall you, it will. At 25 I was perfectly healthy. I got Covid and then overnight was unable to eat food. A month later I was diagnosed with a paralyzed stomach. I had to drop out of cosmetology school, despite being a few months from reaching enough hours for my boards. I had already been there for two years. I had to quit my job I had worked at for 3 years. I lost all of my friends and my entire life as I knew it.
I now am unable to work, my heart functions at 45%. I have a feeding tube and am dependent on that for nutrition. I can’t have anything other than water (not even flavored water). I will never have birthday cake, pizza, a hamburger again. People love to think if you do all of the right things that it can never happen to them. It just isn’t true.
14
scorpyo72Apr 1, 2026
+9
One human to another, I'm sorry that you had to suffer this loss.
9
OppressedCow6148Apr 1, 2026
+6
Thank you. That really does mean a lot.
6
SmogrynMar 31, 2026
+8
Also aids medication to the third world, their lives mean nothing.
8
[deleted]Mar 31, 2026
+232
[deleted]
232
Count_BackwardsMar 31, 2026
+50
"We can't make Heaven but if we make Earth into Hell, anything will look like Heaven in comparison!"
50
Most-Bench6465Mar 31, 2026
+23
They truly, genuinely think they are getting into heaven and to speed the process along by destroying earth and ushering in the apocalypse. No critical thinking skills to understand that that makes you the bad guy.
23
KryptosisMar 31, 2026
+28
Half of the cult is literally attempting to incite The Apocalypse so Jesus will come and take them to the Kingdom of God while the rest of us burn.
They think that will only happen if THEY CREATE THE APOCALYPSE. Think about it. This is shitty super hero movie levels of insane delusion and it’s real and we’re living it.
28
[deleted]Mar 31, 2026
+12
[deleted]
12
LehkMar 31, 2026
+29
His entire family needs to be stripped of all ill gotten gains (entire net worth)
29
TOMC_throwaway000000Mar 31, 2026
+17
Part of the problem is that people thing “oh executive order, at worst it gets fixed next presidency” and fail to take into account real world scenarios where undoing the order doesn’t magically turn back the clock and go back to how things were
17
Suns_In_420Mar 31, 2026
+29
They don't seem very happy.
29
iDrGonzoMar 31, 2026
+24
Same thing Lampert did to sears but to our entire country.
24
drteqMar 31, 2026
+8
it's intentionally irreparable and the consequences of it will be the end of the world, by design
8
TrumpetOfDeathMar 31, 2026
+322
Yeah I saw a headline about the SCOTUS deciding soon on Trump’s executive order abolishing birthright citizenship, which is so blatantly unconstitutional I can’t believe it’s still being fought over a year later.
The speed at which our legal system operates literally cannot handle the speed at which Trump breaks things or issues illegal orders.
If Trump came out with an EO that said there is no freedom of speech and I’m abolishing Presidential term limits, would we spend a year or 2 litigating it in the courts, despite it being obviously unconstitutional? Seems like we would
322
kittenTakeoverMar 31, 2026
+72
When it's something Donald wants the court jumps at the supreme leaders command.
72
latitudesixtysixMar 31, 2026
+25
I've had crunch wraps more Supreme than this Court
25
joshdoeredditMar 31, 2026
+14
Because it's what they want, too. I don't think Trump gives a shit about all the stuff that he's f****** up. His handlers in the GOP, Heritage, Federalist Society, etc. have people whispering his ear promising him wealth and power if xyz gets down.
14
nsdefwMar 31, 2026
+10
Please, Trump obviously wants it as well. He loves breaking things so he can catch whatever money falls out.
10
mekese2000Mar 31, 2026
+86
The justice system is working exactly how they want it to work.
86
under_iceMar 31, 2026
+33
It moves at the speed of the slowest team, almost no limit how long they can drag stuff out.
33
shinyfootworkMar 31, 2026
+55
The Supreme Court and other courts have consistently delayed when it benefited trump and similarly moved quickly when speed was favorable to him.
This isn't just the trump side delaying, it's justices using timing to benefit one side when they don't feel comfortable just making up a decision in his favor.
55
OtterLLCMar 31, 2026
+22
Gotta love SCOTUS constantly lifting lower court orders that put a stop to the law while it's being litigated.
Eventually, after trial court opinions, possibly trials, interlocutory appeals, motions to set aside or reconsider, final appeals, remands, new opinions, second appeals, then cert petition to SCOTUS, these laws and orders get found to be unconstitutional.
And by then it's 6 years later and the unconstitutional policy being in effect that whole time has already had its intended effect. Just as we see here with CPB.
Then SCOTUS will still have the nerve to claim it's upholding the rule of law because hey, look, they made the right ruling.
Eventually.
22
shinyfootworkMar 31, 2026
+8
Hold on there. They'll go further:
They'll decide "oh no, he couldn't do that", but "we can't possibly make him put the pieces back together again, it's been broken for too long [because we said it was totally fine for him to keep breaking it while we delayed]".
It involves the court pretending (when considering an injunction at the start of the case) that it's no big deal, and there's no permanent harm; and then claiming after months/years of litigation that the harm is actually permanent because there's "no way" they can grant a remedy to the harm they claimed was temporary.
The end result is stuff remains broken, but they say "well, donald shouldn't have done that".
8
Wizard_with_a_PipeMar 31, 2026
+27
It was specifically designed to work slowly, they never imagined that a President would actively want to destroy the country. Even campaigning on your own behalf was considered vulgar back then. That's why candidates were nominated. It would be a huge embarrassment to speak in public about why you think you would be a good president. Trump would literally offend all of their sensibilities from that time.
27
GoodbyeNormalJeansMar 31, 2026
+11
To be fair, he's been quite offensive to many of our modern sensibilities for a very long time.
11
theAltRightCornholioMar 31, 2026
+6
Legal system. There's no justice.
6
VirindiMar 31, 2026
+37
>The speed at which our legal system operates **literally cannot handle** the speed at which Trump breaks things or issues illegal orders.
Wrong. They **could** act exponentially faster and prioritize these cases. They could issue temporary restraining orders or injunctions, but they **choose** not to do it. They are complicit in the destruction of the country.
37
ChuckaChuckaLooLoo3Mar 31, 2026
+14
YES! This! It's so aggravating how they bend the rules in whatever shape they want to.
14
Oo__II__oOMar 31, 2026
+24
We need a judge sitting outside the Whitehouse rubber stamping all EOs as unconstitutional before the ink from the Sharpie dries.
24
TyphosTheDMar 31, 2026
+72
It is much easier to break things than it is to stop something from being broken, which is easier than repairing things after they've been broken.
72
GriffinFlashMar 31, 2026
+31
then when repairing things, the repairers will get blamed for the damage, and the breakers comes back in to break more things.
Rinse and repeat.
31
Del_3030Mar 31, 2026
+29
I think the challenges come out quickly, it just takes forever to churn through the system.
29
PolliaMar 31, 2026
+13
The problem is usually while judges are slowly making heir way through this shit everything gets put on hold because the obvious risk of damages if it's left in place while it's being determined if it's constitutional or not, but the conservatives on the supreme Court have just let shit ride.
13
Regular_TailorMar 31, 2026
+21
Bro, that was challenged day 0.
21
spongebob_methMar 31, 2026
+17
Could someone please go to jail for this stuff? I was always under the impression that you get in trouble for breaking laws.
Apparently when you break laws, your actual punishment is someone asking politely to stop breaking laws.
17
rekage99Mar 31, 2026
+8
I don’t understand why anyone listens to these orders when he doesn’t legally have authority in the first place.
Are they all maga idiots just imposing his will and ignoring laws?
8
Heavy_Milk2757Mar 31, 2026
+6
That's the point. Move fast and break things.
*Of course* PBS is for the chop. They aren't blasting fascist propaganda, so this administration has no use for them.
You guys should be so proud that your government is single-handedly destroying the democratic world order and crashing economies everywhere around the globe. That's how you make friends for life!
Anyways, I guess that's what happens when a bunch of proudly illiterate oiks vote in a child rapist twice.
Americans won't even address the fact he stole the election.
6
sleepymoose88Mar 31, 2026
+5
And he knows the courts act slow and no one has the balls (or the enforcement) to stop him before a judgement is issued.
5
ken-davisMar 31, 2026
+8
It was challenged immediately but all things take a while to go through the process.
8
sneeje00Mar 31, 2026
+7
This is the flaw in the system not a flaw in people delaying. It takes expensive, rare legal advisors and attorneys to pursue constitutional challenges. And the courts don't hear them over night.
The authoritarians are exploiting this by using a form of flooding the zone or gish galloping in rhetoric; meaning, break so many things under the assumption the system cannot keep up. And they have been very right
7
qubedViewMar 31, 2026
+482
As was the plan. Part of Project 2025 involves bogging down the courts with nonsense to gum up the works. Challenges to the administrative orders take outsized time to work their way through, giving he president more time to do his damage.
482
RedBarnGuyMar 31, 2026
+115
As always, F this guy and his supporters.
115
SynecticsMar 31, 2026
+41
F*** Trump and f*** his supporters.
Say it with your chest. If you are afraid to say it, someone has already won over you.
41
Desperate-Till-9228Mar 31, 2026
+19
Another example of them not thinking things through to their conclusions. Bogging down the courts is bad for business because businesses also need that framework and strongly prefer clarity over ambiguity.
19
qubedViewMar 31, 2026
+29
Bad for whose business? So long as you're the one in control, there is no ambiguity. Ambiguity is a problem for those outside of their circle.
29
JacobFromAmericaMar 31, 2026
+147
Right? So f****** insane. Like how the government was able to collect hundreds of billions of dollars worth of tariffs and then WHOOPS, that was illegal. Our bad.
147
DingoManDingoMar 31, 2026
+54
Or the destruction of USAID and the infrastructure used to administer that aid.
54
Melancholy_RainbowsMar 31, 2026
+36
So much food and medical supplies wasted. Allowed to rot and destroyed rather than distributed. So much institutional knowledge gone and not coming back.
Even if the organization was revived today, the damage has been done and hundreds of thousands more may very well die.
36
CT_Phipps-AuthorApr 1, 2026
+12
600K children and more have already died. Elon Musk's legacy is this not rockets or even being a con man.
12
MassiveDefinition274Mar 31, 2026
+16
It gets better from there. American companies, of course, had to pay the tariffs on import. They respond by increasing prices for their customers. This means that the end payer of these tariffs is the American consumer, meanwhile companies increased their profit margins by leaving their prices the same after the tariffs come down, while not really "paying" the tariffs.
Then, the tariffs have to get "refunded", but the refund is given to who actually paid the tariffs - the companies.
In essence, the tariffs functioned as yet another way to move money from the poor to the rich.
16
civil_politicianMar 31, 2026
+78
Seems like a nice scaffolding to do some fixing faster than courts can respond on the flip side
78
EagleBigMacMar 31, 2026
+66
Exactly the American people need to start drawing up hard plans for the next administration to fix things in days and weeks, arrest scores, freeze accounts, seize assets and break everything up so quickly even if the courts rule otherwise nothing can be rebuilt of the machine used to destroy America. Seize all of Elons stocks and holdings and sell them all off before he can argue anything in court.
66
ComradeJohnSMar 31, 2026
+16
precedent set in venezuela kidnapping their leader and stealing their oil for literal personal profits.
16
atriaventricaMar 31, 2026
+12
Fair but "the american people" have no ability to DO any of those things. We're a representative democracy. We can vote for people who may be able to do those things but we need people to run who are making plans to do those things.
12
alabasterskimMar 31, 2026
+18
Exactly why I kept saying we should've just forgiven the student loans anyway. What were the courts gonna do then? Saddle people who've been freed from loans with those loans again? A year or so after they stopped paying?
18
MEDICARE_FOR_ALLMar 31, 2026
+54
CPB should sue the admin for costs to re set back up.
54
HornetPhysical4598Mar 31, 2026
+27
And in the end the American taxpayer gets to pay for it again. Zero consequences for Trump admin and they know it, they're probably laughing their asses off with this shit. I'm not even American but I don't understand how Americans blood doesn't boil over.
27
lazyFerMar 31, 2026
+8
I'm in favor of complete asset forfeiture of the people doing these things
They are defrauding the American people
8
MattieShoesMar 31, 2026
+18
Since corporations are people, does that make him a murderer?
18
Unique-Egg-461Mar 31, 2026
+12
[somewhat similar to the VOA c*** going on](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-orders-restoration-voice-of-america/)
these people have been outta their job for more than a year and now they are gonna reach out and say "oh you can have your job back"
Most if not all of these people probably already got other jobs and why the hell would i wanna come back to an openly hostile workplace?
12
MyHamburgerLovesMeMar 31, 2026
+9
Due to the cowards that Republicans Senators and Representatives have turned into, Trumps proclamation are treated as commands from a King.
That, and spinless Supreme Court who told Trump that no matter what he did in office he would never be punished.
Giving unchecked power to a bully only encourages them to commit worse outrages.
9
badwolf42Mar 31, 2026
+6
This is of course the strategy. If it sticks, great. If not, the damage was already done. Goal achieved either way.
6
VR_RaccoonteurMar 31, 2026
+9
I wonder if the former PBS employees could now sue him personally? If a judge rules his actions were illegal, then they clearly never fell within the duties of a president.
9
Orwells_RosesMar 31, 2026
+984
Most of what he does is unconstitutional. It’s kind of his thing.
984
flashlightgigglesMar 31, 2026
+129
Can anybody make a list of things that Trump has done that IS constitutional?
129
hamilton280PMar 31, 2026
+96
Peaceful transfer of.. oh wait nvm
96
black_flag_4everMar 31, 2026
+34
Well he did take that shit at a press conference.
34
greenbabyshitMar 31, 2026
+9
We should actually write a law about that.
9
VankrakenMar 31, 2026
+12
I disapprove of people crapping their pants but I'll defend to the death their right to do so.
12
greenbabyshitMar 31, 2026
+4
Normal people get a pass once in a while ..
Elected officials should be forced to retire if they shit their pants in public.
Seems like a low hurdle.
4
washingtonpostMar 31, 2026
+1164
A federal judge in Washington struck down part of President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting funding for NPR and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) on Tuesday, ruling that it was unconstitutional retaliation that violated their press freedom rights under the First Amendment.
The May 1, 2025, executive order, titled “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Biased Media,” cut off funding to public media — with Trump calling out what he perceived as left-wing bias in NPR’s and PBS’s news reporting.
“The message is clear,” U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss, a Barack Obama appointee to the federal bench, wrote in an opinion. “NPR and PBS need not apply for any federal benefit because the President disapproves of their ‘left-wing’ coverage of the news,” he wrote, adding that the action amounted to “viewpoint discrimination.”
Read more here: [https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/03/31/trump-npr-pbs-funding-unconstitutional/?utm\_campaign=wp\_main&utm\_medium=social&utm\_source=listnook.com](https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/03/31/trump-npr-pbs-funding-unconstitutional/?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=listnook.com)
1164
TheZapsterMar 31, 2026
+463
To the Supreme Court we will go!
I am so tired of all the winning 😔
463
BicFleetwoodMar 31, 2026
+330
It doesn't matter what this ruling is, the corporation for public broadcasting is already dissolved.
Like with the rulings on the illegal firings, the consequences have long since been set in stone.
330
AM_A_BANANAMar 31, 2026
+85
It's like they're trying to maintain the facade of still being a legitimate court or something by ruling correctly only after it doesn't mater anymore.
85
wittyrandomusernameMar 31, 2026
+72
The legal system simply does not move fast. Always been that way. This is something the Trump administration is exploiting.
72
SmurfStigApr 1, 2026
+15
This is something he has always taken advantage of knows how to use it for his benefit. There is no way he should have escaped prison when he got out of office the first time but he and his “lawyers” kept throwing shit at the wall and the courts had to deal with it. THE only thing this man is good as is taking advantage of a situation for his personal benefit. Whether it’s using court systems to his benefit or taking advantage/conning his cult for unlimited funds.
15
Trail_DogMar 31, 2026
+16
The lower courts maybe. The supreme Court has dropped the facade.
16
Glass_Recover_3006Mar 31, 2026
+12
I don’t see how that is relevant. NPR and OPB still exist and operate today. The funding can absolutely undo the damage that was done, it’ll just take some time.
12
SassyMcNastyMar 31, 2026
+29
Bingo.
29
snark42Mar 31, 2026
+19
Judge could reverse the dissolution as part of the ruling.
19
LlanolinnMar 31, 2026
+71
You can't just order everybody to go back to work at the same position. They had before and carry on business as usual. Most, if not, all of those people have moved on.
The damage is done. You'd have to start over from the beginning again. Which I do think should be done, but it's a waste of f****** money to have to do it again
71
WardenUnleashedMar 31, 2026
+35
While I do want it back…do we really want this administration “reforming” it?
35
LlanolinnMar 31, 2026
+30
...
F***. I really dislike all of this. Fair point.
30
CynicalBlissMar 31, 2026
+19
IIRC that was part of the motivation for the dissolution, to prevent it from being perverted by further attacks from the Trump administration while it limped along if kept intact.
19
Tacoman404Mar 31, 2026
+6
That was the point of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting self dissolving. They didn't want it to be used for nefarious purposes like running pragerU and propaganda.
6
MagicAl6244225Mar 31, 2026
+11
A future president can appoint a new board. It would be starting almost from scratch but the underlying statutory authority is protected by the filibuster, Republicans could only turn off the money through budget reconcilation while they have a majority in Congress.
A precedent is the Legal Services Corporation. Republicans tried to kill it, Reagan appointed a board that voted to wind it down, but Republicans couldn't repeal the law creating it and future administrations were able to revive it.
11
BicFleetwoodMar 31, 2026
+17
The judge can’t order everybody back to a job they lost 3 months ago. Nobody is coming back to that job knowing they’ll lose it again within a week when the Trump admin fires them all illegally again.
This is what has happened with most of the federal workforce reductions. The government was ordered to give people their jobs back, and the few that went back got ousted *again.*
17
eragonawesome2Mar 31, 2026
+26
So he'll be impeached for illegally circumventing the constitution... right?
26
gumgajuaMar 31, 2026
+44
Actually, the message isn't clear at all because you're only scolding him, not actually doing anything about him.
44
RanccorMar 31, 2026
+11
Which is hilarious since NPR was one of the least bias sources available. They went out of their way to not make right wing crazies sound crazy. Meanwhile, actual bias sources are free and clear.
11
FeedmeallmondsMar 31, 2026
+7
Reading that made me have a little “aha” moment that I really should have had earlier. We hear so much blather from the right about left wing bias but they don’t consider their own media to be right wing biased. Just another area where their constant screeching tries to make their viewpoint the baseline and anything outside of it as unworthy or wrong.
Truly is a fascist government working to silence any opposing viewpoints.
7
IzarkKiaTarjMar 31, 2026
+4
> titled “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Biased Media,”
If that was the goal, why'd they stop funding *all* public broadcasting? My local classical music station wasn't talking politics at all, and they got cut off, too.
F****** assholes.
4
sdbrewsMar 31, 2026
+370
Might be unconstitutional, but it - and the damage - has already been done. Who is going to undo it? How will it be enforced? Trump has already shown it doesnt matter what the courts say, he will do whatever he wants.
370
VeterinarianProof808Mar 31, 2026
+135
Congress is the only entity that can hold him accountable for unconstitutional acts through impeachment and removal from office. That's it, that's all the options we the people have against a President that ignores the Constitution.
135
HybridPS2Mar 31, 2026
+32
well you can't talk about the other options on listnook
32
macphileMar 31, 2026
+19
Or anywhere, arguably. But we can certainly think about them. They can't police thoughts--yet. Black Mirror is a warning to us all, lol.
19
_Choose-A-Username-Mar 31, 2026
+6
That's all the options that they would prefer. The most effective options are ofc illegal.
6
RickboxMar 31, 2026
+538
And yet he's going to continue doing it anyway.
538
timnphillyMar 31, 2026
+87
Understatement: such an ungodly amount of OUR taxpayer money, Trump is burning though - governing by courts.
Ungodly.
Why aren't more people pissed off about that?
87
NinevehenianMar 31, 2026
+40
He's ruining the economy in 3 other ways on any given day.
40
PetalPusheenMar 31, 2026
+168
Good move by the judge, moves like that can’t just happen unchecked. NPR and PBS are public services, not political tools.
168
TellTaleTimeLordMar 31, 2026
+111
Well, uh...the corporation for public broadcasting has already dissolved, so
111
AnonAmbientLightMar 31, 2026
+51
I’d be interested to see what the mechanism would be to set it back up.
I know that’s gonna be hard to do, but it’s not like it can’t be done.
51
Disgruntled_SmittyMar 31, 2026
+7
Yep reassemble it!
7
TellTaleTimeLordMar 31, 2026
+21
I agree with you, but sadly I think by the time there's any opportunity to do it, it's too late
21
AnonAmbientLightMar 31, 2026
+20
Why is there "no opportunity to do it"?
How did they set it up the first time when it didn't exist at all?
20
TellTaleTimeLordMar 31, 2026
+32
Because the Republicans in Congress have already officially unfunded it anyways, and sadly I doubt CPB will be at the top of the priority list for undoing all the of shit Mango Mussolini has done
32
ArgentNobleMar 31, 2026
+32
>Why is there "no opportunity to do it"?
The current makeup of Congress refuses to fund it.
>How did they set it up the first time when it didn't exist at all?
Back in the '60s, both major parties actually cared about the greater US society. So they got together and created CPB to help further public education, culture, and other various content for the public good.
32
moosekin16Mar 31, 2026
+17
Well, Corporate for Public Broadcasting dissolved three months ago as a direct result of Trump's elimination of their funding, and CPB was one of the primary funders of PBS and NPR. https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2026/01/07/are-pbs-npr-shutting-down-corporation-public-broadcasting/88046403007/
Once again, Trump does something blatantly illegal (the President cannot decide to stop funding a group/organization that Congress has already appropriated funds for), it takes the courts months to tell him he can't do that, but the Courts are so slow that by the time he's been stopped the damage has already been done.
Sure, it was an illegal order and Trump was not "allowed" to do that. But does it matter? The damage has been done. Trump "won" and got what he wanted. He killed CPB. Unless Congress "resurrects" CPB, it's over. Congress has willingly allowed Trump to illegally kill CPB and indirectly damage PBS and NPR, and refuse to hold him accountable for it.
Gods I wish Congress would get Trump's puppet hand out of their ass and *do their f****** jobs*. Stop letting Trump do illegal shit. Stop letting Trump completely ignore Congress.
17
HerbaciousTeaMar 31, 2026
+4
This is a direct consequence of republicans stealing the Supreme Court and using it to constantly overturn and then completely destroy the injunction process, which exists explicitly for this purpose of preventing potentially illegal actions from being put into effect until their legality can be determined.
A vital check in the system of checks and balances is just gone.
4
ThePhonyOrchestraMar 31, 2026
+181
Why the f*** was there a stay for the Biden student loan thing, but not for this?
God I tucking hate this country
181
kos-or-kosmMar 31, 2026
+46
Because this is how the US court system functions:
1. Anything that hurts people must continue until it can be ruled on.
2. Anything that helps people must be stopped until it can be ruled on.
46
ThaddeusJPMar 31, 2026
+36
> Why the f*** was there a stay for the Biden student loan thing, but not for this?
MOEHLA (servicer) argued that they wouldnt earn/collect interest on forgiven loans. Basically, because MONEY.
36
jcarter315Mar 31, 2026
+29
No, MOHELA had actually argued they were fine with the loan plans. It was ***the state of Missouri*** suing and claiming it would hurt MOHELA.
They literally had no standing whatsoever in the case.
29
frieddumplingsMar 31, 2026
+44
This Pres did something unconstitutional? No way!
44
JacobFromAmericaMar 31, 2026
+10
Wild how republicans keep saying the no kings protest is dumb bc America hasn’t had a king since 1776.
Motherfuqers…. OPEN YOUR EYES AND USE YOUR F****** BRAIN
10
ranchoparksteveMar 31, 2026
+32
Sunny day
Sweepin' the clouds away
On my way to where the air is sweet
32
socalspawnMar 31, 2026
+20
Sue the shit out of him and bring it back.
20
I_might_be_weaselMar 31, 2026
+15
There has to be repercussions for this stuff.
15
Captain_Aware4503Mar 31, 2026
+41
Americans do not get it. This was planned all along.
Trump and MAGA are based on the same strategy. Repeat a lie enough and people start to believe or at least question the truth. They can demonize someone, destroy an institution, and even bring down democracy with with this.
At the same time, they can flood the US with unconstitutional laws and orders, all why crying and saying courts are rigged and judges are targeting them. As the judges rule against them, it only makes their supporters believe the lies even more. And some of the orders and unconstitutional actions get through without being blocked.
Lie enough and make enough unconstitutional orders and gullible people will believe them.
Good thing they got on that a year later after lots of people lost their jobs.
*^(Heck my old job worked directly with pbs, so prob a reason why they don't have much work now either. F*** Trump.)*
12
aprilhareMar 31, 2026
+9
Bring on the Supreme Lackey Court. They’ll sort it for the orange one.
9
AbominableToasteMar 31, 2026
+11
Shouldn't it only have been eliminated AFTER the courts deemed it ok? Why was it dismantled before the case was heard?
11
ghostwoodMar 31, 2026
+10
Donald Trump rapes children.
10
daviesjoMar 31, 2026
+8
Should the next Democratic administration take the same “It’s better to ask for forgiveness rather than ask for permission” approach? Right or wrong tear it down.
8
BigTonez808syMar 31, 2026
+8
Great. Now enforce reinstating the funding and hire the people back. Oh, wait, sorry, I was thinking we still had a functioning democracy where rule of law had consequences and the president wasn’t a despot completely outside the law.
8
Lurking_nerdMar 31, 2026
+6
Cool. So who’s going to enforce it?
6
RhoeriMar 31, 2026
+5
Trump’s existence is unconstitutional.
5
Hakuna_MatotoMar 31, 2026
+7
Wake me up when we get accountability and consequences.
7
Suro_AtirosMar 31, 2026
+5
welp it's a little late for that.
5
Shopping_GeneralMar 31, 2026
+5
And he doesn't care about court rulings. He's daring you to make him.
5
MyFirstCarWasA_VegaMar 31, 2026
+3
Failure of the courts and justice system #57 during Trump's time in office. And we have almost three years to go and STILL they've done nothing to erect a “doorway” Trump must go through and prove his actions are legal before doing them.
Since no one agrees that there is ANY IMMINENT threat to our country, no Trump action based on that should proceed without congressional and/or court oversight.
Those who want to take down our Democracy (and country as we know it with it) have been studying the legal system surrounding politicians and the president for decades. They build the system that cannot respond quickly to illegal presidential actions, and then turned a president and administration loose that couldn't care less about laws, norms, morality, legality, etc.
America IS at war. But not with Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Mexico, Canada, Greenland, etc.
All because they're terrified of lgbtq citizens.
3
darcerinMar 31, 2026
+4
I'll take this win.
4
CinderheartApr 1, 2026
+5
Finally *someone* remembered the constitution exists.
5
Ham_I_rightApr 1, 2026
+5
I propose the next president sees to it via executive order that trump is chained to a desk and forced to eat McDonald's hamburgers until his gut explodes or heart gives out. We can sort it out in the courts months later if it was an oopsies.
5
lostmojoApr 1, 2026
+6
Two things come to mind for this…
And then what?
And
Make them do something about it and repay the lost income out of Donald’s funds. Make him and his cronies repay it all with interest if you’re going to do something about it.
6
Efficient_Care5524Apr 1, 2026
+5
Just so you know, even if you aren’t a fan of NPR or PBS, the idea of a President being able to unilaterally defund specific organizations based on disfavored expression should worry everyone. Today it’s them; tomorrow it’s whoever the next administration dislikes
5
visitor987Mar 31, 2026
+9
[Congress already cut the funding](https://www.axios.com/2025/07/18/npr-pbs-funding-senate) for PBS and NPR a few months after the exec order so ruling is moot.
9
dchap1Mar 31, 2026
+5
At what point do republicans impeach the ass hat? He keeps doing stuff that is illegal and basically gets away with it. He might get told by a judge to reverse the damage, but that’s it. On to the next crime
5
ConfessorKahlanMar 31, 2026
+3
they'd have an easier time listing what he's done that was constitutional.
3
exqueezemenowMar 31, 2026
+4
Just throw that in the pile of the other unconstitutional things he has done.
4
ReleaseFromDeceptionMar 31, 2026
+4
No duh. They knew it was illegal when they did it.
The whole point is to move fast and break things while they have perceived impunity. The fact the court lags so far behind in this process is something they are exploiting.
4
grahagMar 31, 2026
+3
This is the problem with being tolerant of shoot first and ask questions later.
Trump's administration does the damage and then when the judiciary says it's unconstitutional, they say with a sneer, "Oh well", realizing that entity they defunded is dead and won't be back.
They get a pass and are not EVER held accountable. There needs to be clear penalties for breaching the constitution.
3
Stinja808Mar 31, 2026
+5
theres gonna be a whole US History course about things trump did that were illegal and unconstitutional
5
djugglerMar 31, 2026
+4
"Judge rules barber cut hair too short. Demands hair be put back to original length."
4
Poopy_poo_pooMar 31, 2026
+3
NPR is still active and taking donations from the public now. People are stepping up. This administration is a disgrace to our economy and is affecting our day to day life, negatively.
3
RampantTyrMar 31, 2026
+3
It’s so great that judges and justices are allowing the damage while they contemplate ruling instead of blocking the illegal actions while it makes it way through proper deliberations.
This won’t possibly ruin many institutions.
3
izzgoMar 31, 2026
+5
Don't worry the Supreme Court will overturn that ruling.
5
wholetyouinhereMar 31, 2026
+4
Great! Mail it to last year when it might have made a f****** difference.
4
SmartPea320Mar 31, 2026
+3
And. Does the judge have the button to put it all back in place? Or rehire or pay everyone? Nope. So really nothing happens until you have new admin. If ever.
The law is too slow
3
Fine-Government9216Mar 31, 2026
+4
Add this to the long list of unconstitional acts
4
kromelMar 31, 2026
+4
Trump and every single Trump supporter are pieces of shit. It’s evident every single day.
4
fcatwApr 1, 2026
+3
Great, now what’s going to be done about it
3
mjconverMar 31, 2026
+3
I'm tired, boss
3
modernmannMar 31, 2026
+3
Way to slow roll this ruling 😂
3
Donmiggy143Mar 31, 2026
+3
Oh good, now I'm sure they'll get right on reversing that decision.
3
AmorousAlpacaMar 31, 2026
+3
If a president does this many unconstitutional things they should be removed from office. The problem is that our government is captured by corruption and there is no desire by those in charge to remove him.
3
SuckMyRedditorDMar 31, 2026
+3
How the f*** is letting the quacks from conversion therapy get scot free from liability over their freedom of speech but suddenly NPR had easily taken that right away?
If Americans were as tough with their inhouse shit as they are when it comes to fighting foreigners in far away lands, we'd ...oh f*** it, let's institute f****** democracy in the USA already!! We need to get high on our own f****** supply.
3
Petrified_RobinMar 31, 2026
+3
This can't be true. His oath of office says he will uphold the Constitution. right, Right, RIGHT?
3
Real-Extension-1357Mar 31, 2026
+3
Add it to the pile, the scum f*** is a criminal and continues to do unconstitutional shit with zero enforcement
3
Safe_Base312Mar 31, 2026
+3
The constitution is a worthless piece of paper now. No one is even trying to defend it.
3
cubanjewMar 31, 2026
+3
Is there a website that summarizes all the court-decided unconstitutional things that this administration has done? Must be a record
3
guitarburst05Mar 31, 2026
+3
So they're going to get back-pay and recover any costs associated with the dissolution of the corporation for public broadcasting, right?
..right?
3
Cautious_Condition82Mar 31, 2026
+3
They know most of these orders wont stand... thing is once you destroy agencies and fire everyone it doesnt really matter 6 months later.
Going to see the same thing about the department of education.
3
HerculesIsMyDadMar 31, 2026
+3
Maybe if 87% of the things you do get ruled unconstitutional, you're being president wrong. This guys actions fall into three categories: Unconstitutional, Unreviewable, and giving rich people money.
3
DoctorZacharySmithMar 31, 2026
+3
Great work,judge. Thanks for taking months to work out what anyone else saw in a minute.
3
Cassp3Mar 31, 2026
+3
Oh it is is it? Okay then... Guess we'll just do nothing then.
3
Sea_Instruction7334Mar 31, 2026
+3
how dare underprivileged people have access to objective information!
3
Present-Map-7094Mar 31, 2026
+3
Honest question: why are these legal decisions being made now and do they effectively order the administration to fix what they broke?
3
teamdiabetes11Mar 31, 2026
+6
No. The decision will be applied to some money that wasn’t yet already spent elsewhere. Corporation for Public Broadcasting also shut down as a result of this and has been closed for a bit. They will not reopen. Trump’s actions still have some lasting and long term damage, because he specifically wants to break as much as possible as fast as possible. The decision does not undo what was done, but does ensure the rest of the money isn’t misappropriated.
This is the Project 2025 playbook: Break stuff everywhere and make people take forever to litigate it while you’ve already done irreparable harm in the meantime. If you win, then you get your way. If you lose, damage cannot all be reversed. It’s cynical and sick AF, but that’s what Americans voted for. Buncha idiots.
6
BadIdeaBobcatMar 31, 2026
+3
"Judge rules Trump isn't congress."
Yeah we know.
3
postprandialreposeMar 31, 2026
+3
The world looks forward to the day when he's reduced to a completely forgettable obit. May that day be tomorrow — if not today!
3
Dramatic-Bear52Mar 31, 2026
+3
So whats the consequence?
3
ShatoraDragonMar 31, 2026
+3
So he is going to do it anyway and gut it till it's barely functional then brag about partly funding it and saving it.
3
LucifurnaceMar 31, 2026
+3
Its easier for me to believe that Trump will be televised raping children at the super bowl than it will be for me to believe that our legal system will do anything more than wag a finger at him.
3
Signal-Regret-8251Apr 1, 2026
+3
The vast majority of Trump's actions have been unconstitutional.
3
rwf2017Apr 1, 2026
+3
trump shits on the constitution on a daily basis.
3
RealFrankieBucketsApr 1, 2026
+3
I don't classify him as the worst president, even though he is, but as worst human beings this world has ever seen.
3
srp101Apr 1, 2026
+3
Hopefully, people will be held accountable when a more reasonable administration takes over. Because the Democrats would certainly NOT forget about all of the illegal stuff Trump and his minions did and go “wow we won the election everything is ok now, back to sanity”. Right? Right?!
198 Comments