· 200 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 15, 2026 at 7:13 PM

Jury finds that Ticketmaster and Live Nation had an anticompetitive monopoly over big concert venues

Posted by ThatMasterpiece2174


Jury finds that Ticketmaster and Live Nation had an anticompetitive monopoly over big concert venues
AP News
Jury finds that Ticketmaster and Live Nation had an anticompetitive monopoly over big concert venues
A jury has found that concert giant Live Nation and its Ticketmaster subsidiary engaged in an anticompetitive monopoly.

🚩 Report this post

200 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Malvania 3 days ago +4081
And now for the penalties phase. None of this matters if they aren't broken up.
4081
colemon1991 3 days ago +1577
Penalties should be profit + some percentage as damages + interest based on earliest incident involved. Any penalties that aren't over 100% of what they earned isn't a punishment.
1577
pdfrg 3 days ago +670
THIS! Penalties should deter the offense. Especially for the long term, like 30 YEARS!!!! Cigarette companies got hit with billions in fines after they were caught knowingly selling hazardous product (and covering up and lying in court that they knew). Now they’re more profitable than ever because they formed or merged into new corporations and jacked up prices tenfold. It is not enough to win a court battle. Penalties must be catastrophic. Legislation must be strict. No one should attempt to game the system and do it again.
670
lateriser 3 days ago +500
I've been saying this for YEARS with Wells Fargo. They get slapped with "fines" that aren't more than what they profited while breaking the law. Until the fine is larger than the profit, it's not a fine, it's just the cost of doing business.
500
meepswag35 3 days ago +162
Yeah the cruise ships got fined for dumping garbage in the ocean, the fine was less than it would have cost to properly dispose of the trash.
162
surfron99 3 days ago +46
Yeah for them it’s the cost of doing business. Like you said they knew it was cheaper to pay the civil penalty than properly disposing of the trash.
46
Monotask_Servitor 3 days ago +24
Same with construction companies and property developers that destroy buildings with heritage protections.
24
DJMixwell 3 days ago +30
In my town a developer “accidentally” put two extra stories on a new building, and by some f****** miracle the city actually had the balls to tell them to take them down, costing them well over a million dollars and delaying the project several months. I don’t think anyone expected them to actually have the stones to do it.
30
SleepyMastodon 3 days ago +62
You’re close. Until the punishment is jail time for executives nothing will change. Any fine, no matter how large, gets paid by the company, which 1) Uses it as a tax write-off, and 2) passes the cost on to customers. Start throwing the top people in prison and stuff will change almost overnight.
62
Gurlllllllll- 3 days ago +17
The punishment should be that the government takes ownership of your business now and there's no more profit to be had. When private corporations prove that they'll break the law to profit, the result should not be "Well hopefully this time they've learned their lesson." It should be business licenses being ripped to shreds. Individuals getting punished won't meaningfully change the system.
17
fascistno1hater 3 days ago +13
If this is anything like the SEC then the best they can do is a 1% fine of the profits and a letter admitting to no wrongdoing.
13
gntrr 3 days ago +76
No it should be a breakup of Ticketmaster and live nation. It reminds me of how 100 years ago film studios owned all of the movie theaters. It's crazy they were allowed to merge in the first place. 
76
sposda 3 days ago +25
It wasn't so much that they owned all the theaters but that they de facto controlled their booking, which was a copy of how the vaudeville circuits were doing it 20 years prior and pretty much what Live Nation still does. A long history of monopolies.
25
EdiblePeasant 3 days ago +11
Do monopolies sometimes get into cahoots with government and then it's just a really bad situation all around?
11
Zestyclose-Cap4721 3 days ago +6
Sort of, in older nations that was relatively common but now you’ll see “natural monopolies” that are protected by the government. To qualify as one they have to provide cheaper and better service than a monopolistic competition so it’s usually restricted to utilities type companies that would suffer from diseconomies of scale otherwise. All that is to say that monopolies are not expressly illegal but to be a legal monopoly you have to be pretty on the up and up. Now we’ve replaced monopolies with oligopolies which sometimes collude (illegal) to create faux monopolies and they survive by lobbying legislators. So typically true monopolies that aren’t natural monopolies have a hard time surviving the government but if they split into four companies with different names they can work together and pay off legislators and that’s more or less the system we have now
6
LtOrangeJuice 3 days ago +27
NO, it shouldn't be profit, it should be all sales. Profit means they can wiggle out of it by things like giving themselves bonuses.
27
zxern 3 days ago +9
I’d rather see the company broken up than pay a big penalty.
9
elebrin 3 days ago +7
The better penalty would be forcing a breakup of the business. The breakup needs to be done intelligently so that it's not just creating regional monopolies, but rather 3 or more companies competing in the same geographic markets. The company manages online sales, resale of tickets, and in-person ticket booth sales. Those three parts of the business could be broken apart. There might be a better way to break them down, because we really need a competing online retail place for buying tickets.
7
FifiTheFancy 3 days ago +6
The only way to make a difference is by jailing owners and directors. They don’t care if a percentage of their revenue is gone for a year. They’ll just cut wages from the employees or raise prices.
6
TrumpLikesEmYoung 3 days ago +103
This may sound childish but I want f****** criminal convictions in corporate cases like this
103
akitash1ba 3 days ago +27
not childish at all
27
gabemoment_ 3 days ago +38
crazy that if i do an illegal thing as an individual i can be held criminally liable and go to jail. but in if i do it while working for a business then oh no it's the business doing it, not the people making the decisions LMAO
38
TooLazyToRepost 3 days ago +18
All while asserting personhood! It's ridiculous. They have the rights of humans but none of the risk. And no DOJ is bold enough to go for the Corporate Death Penalty.
18
moldyhands 3 days ago +79
If they’re not broken up, then just rip up the Sherman Antitrust Act and use it for kindling.
79
punkasstubabitch 3 days ago +45
a penalty which will be just the "cost of doing business" while the C-suite already has their bonuses and golden parachutes.
45
GODDAMNFOOL 3 days ago +25
$2 million and a promise to try and not do it again, but it's okay if you do
25
itrainmonkeys 3 days ago +6
The rich ruling class isn't going to allow that. Ticketmaster going to bribe and suck up to Trump and he or the Supreme Court will make things go away
6
igetproteinfartsHELP 3 days ago +11823
Finally. This took too long. Remember how Live Nation’s Top Executives sent each other's messages about robbing the fans blind.
11823
Kyosji 3 days ago +2917
I remember the undercover video of a scalpers convention where they had literal booths up.
2917
Kyosji 3 days ago +1510
For those interested. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjGj6Wpia\_k](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjGj6Wpia_k) [https://www.thestar.com/news/investigations/we-went-undercover-as-ticket-scalpers-and-ticketmaster-offered-to-help-us-do-business/article\_475cbd40-6c6b-555f-83a3-7d225694669d.html](https://www.thestar.com/news/investigations/we-went-undercover-as-ticket-scalpers-and-ticketmaster-offered-to-help-us-do-business/article_475cbd40-6c6b-555f-83a3-7d225694669d.html)
1510
ThePrussianGrippe 3 days ago +801
Jesus Christ, that’s so blatant.
801
Pete_Iredale 3 days ago +834
Ticketmaster literally allows people to scalp tickets on their own webpage now. It's completely fucked the prices for sporting events when a ton of ticket purchasers are just scalpers who will double the price of the ticket without adding any value to the end user.
834
ThaSnowMexican 3 days ago +881
You forgot the part where ticketmaster collects the fees on both transactions. Ticketmaster sucks butts.
881
badgerj 3 days ago +432
In the 90’s several bands were talking about this, and trying to get people to ditch ticketmaster.
432
porican 3 days ago +374
and what did they discover? that they couldn’t, because they had a monopoly, and lobbied aggressively enough to keep it
374
Monotask_Servitor 3 days ago +635
Pearl Jam literally sacrificed their peak touring years boycotting Ticketmaster, ultimately for nothing. Shame more bands didn’t take similar stands, something might’ve been achieved.
635
Dry_Doctor_3585 3 days ago +151
I remember that. Their second album was originally going to be called 5 against 1 because of their fight against the company. The band wasn't sure which name to go with and by the time they decided to go with Vs, some of the albums had already been printed without the name anywhere on them.
151
badgerj 3 days ago +53
I was actually referring to PJ. I’m glad you picked up on it. Sadly one of the few I’ve never had the experience of seeing live.
53
Fantastic_AF 3 days ago +31
Also a shame fans won’t refuse to buy resale tickets at inflated prices. Ticketmaster is some shit for this, but we’re allowing the resale market to flourish. We have to learn to stand together against these corporations or no real change is ever going to happen.
31
Valnar8 3 days ago +48
This was a perfect example of how the market doesn't regulate itself
48
oswaldcopperpot 3 days ago +90
20 years of obscene profits already. There is no penalty that will make a dent in how much they've made.
90
New_Libran 3 days ago +27
Yep, you could fine them $100m and they will gladly pay triple
27
onefst250r 3 days ago +19
When the penalty is a fine, its just the cost of doing business.
19
mia_sara 3 days ago +49
Thank you. FFS hasn’t Ticketmaster been awful since I was a teenager in the 90s… this is still going on? Do we need to wheel out Kurt Loder and have another MTV Special Report?
49
Pit-Viper-13 3 days ago +25
I’m still amazed by his ability to say “The Butthole Surfers” and keep a straight face. 🤣🤣🤣
25
mia_sara 3 days ago +8
OMG I just heard him say that in my head (all deep voiced and serious) and about died😂 His MTV News Updates were to me what Tom Brokaw’s Breaking News were to my parents. “They interrupted regularly scheduled programming. What did Courtney do now?”
8
Icy_Insect2927 3 days ago +8
The 90s are a little hazy for me, but I feel like Pearl Jam was one of them
8
WhipTheLlama 3 days ago +59
Ticketmaster's fees on resale tickets are incredibly high. I wanted to sell 2 extra concert tickets at face value, but ticketmaster charged something like $40 per ticket for $160 tickets. The problem with ticketmaster's business model is that every competitor is an existential threat. It's a hard industry to break into, but every ticket purchaser hates ticketmaster and would happily switch to a competitor. They are going to die a fast, brutal death one day.
59
thejawa 3 days ago +36
I bought a $20 WWE ticket once that had $20 in fees and parking was $20. Literally 100% the cost of the ticket in fees
36
Solo-ish 3 days ago +21
Worse on 3 transactions. Ticketmaster his fees on the buyer of first purchase Ticketmaster charges fees to the buyer of the ticket being resold Ticketmaster charges fees to the seller of the ticket being resold. F*** Ticketmaster
21
snowdn 3 days ago +70
We will make, steal and eat the cakes.
70
madhi19 3 days ago +28
And still own the cake.
28
CheeesyPotato 3 days ago +9
I bought 5 tickets to a concert for about $90 each a few years ago and it sold out. One of my buddies didnt go so I sold 1 ticket for $100 and only got like $70 something back because of fees. Crazy how I sold it for $10 more and still didnt get all my money back.
9
ThaSnowMexican 3 days ago +5
Brutal. F*** ticketmaster!
5
DukestormThunderclap 3 days ago +15
Hey now. Let's not paint sucking butts in a bad light.
15
filthy_harold 3 days ago +33
Ah but it makes the event more exclusive if the tickets are 3x face value. You wouldn't want your friends at the country club to think you bought discounted tickets, would you?
33
AmethystStar9 3 days ago +25
Don't forget that that self-scalping operation was the result of the last time the government said TM was a monopoly. They got fined (pocket change for them) and told they needed to allow competition in the market, so they just set up another essential shadow company they owned and the government said "alright, well, yeah, that's fine."
25
Sad-Hair-5025 3 days ago +15
How likely is it these "scalpers" are just bot accounts of Ticketmaster
15
doktorcrash 3 days ago +17
Regular people legit start companies that are just for ticket reselling. I see the card accounts they use to buy them sometimes at my job. I hate them.
17
mary_emeritus 3 days ago +11
I’ve always suspected that Ticketmaster is their own scalper. Might be why some artists are saying no resale. Which makes it very difficult for real, honest ticket holders to put up for resale if they can’t make the event.
11
jessuckapow 3 days ago +7
Used to be able to post those on CL but not anymore. The scammers and bots are off the charts terrible. Honestly… I’m glad I saw as many shows as I did between 9yrs old and 40 bcs I sure as shit am not dealing w this garbage anymore.
7
WthIsDis 3 days ago +36
"The love of money is the root of all kinds of evil." Straight lying through their teeth at congress with no intention to do anything that hurts their bottom dollar.
36
Jokkitch 3 days ago +34
*7 years ago*
34
Legitimate_Part_7338 3 days ago +34
Awesome, now look into rhe Pokemon card retailers. Something going on there, too. There's no reason I should walk up to a freshly opened GameStop to find that they have two booster boxes and three mini tins out of a pack of eight on release day!
34
thethunder92 3 days ago +32
And what about when I was a kid my dad told me there was “dad tax” on my chocolate, I’ve talked to a lawyer and no such tax exists!
32
tylenol3 3 days ago +27
As a father of several I can assure you that, while it might seem archaic, this law dates back to the Magna Carta.
27
angelzpanik 3 days ago +15
As a mother of one, can confirm. Cheese tax is also legit, as my dogs will gladly verify at any given moment in the kitchen.
15
nonetakenback 3 days ago +12
See that’s your problem. You need to talk to an accountant. They’re more up to date on tax laws and loopholes
12
thethunder92 3 days ago +11
My accountant is my mom, I wonder if they’re in cahoots
11
brown-and-sticky 3 days ago +21
Hate to break it to you, but word on the streets that they've been in bed with each other for a while now.
21
Interesting_Walk_271 3 days ago +49
StubHub’s entire business model is just ticket scalping.
49
kpopyowoni 3 days ago +21
Ditto VividSeats and SeatGeek. All these sites should be illegal, but instead we have bribery and corruption.
21
[deleted] 3 days ago +18
[removed]
18
ponzLL 3 days ago +34
I don't even have to be able to read this comment to know what it suggested lmao
34
GREG_FABBOTT 3 days ago +14
I don't either and yet I find myself hoping that it'll happen lol
14
LoverKing2698 3 days ago +10
We should do a huge scalpers convention I mean huge and all scalpers are invited for free flights and everything paid for. Just to show we are more accepting of them now. They’ll even get that wood pulp material warehouse treatment. Be sure to lock the doors so no body can harm them or rain on their parade. ♥️
10
[deleted] 3 days ago +511
[deleted]
511
lordpanda 3 days ago +123
Stubhub actually IPO'd but it's down 75% since going public.
123
Wyden_long 3 days ago +41
That’s a shame….
41
lostintime2004 3 days ago +33
Oh no! Who will think about the billionaires?! ^^^^^^^^^^/s
33
kuro41 3 days ago +36
They even have the nerve to charge a "convenience fee" if you print your own tickets at home.
36
Inside_You_6038 3 days ago +20
There's a convenience fee for putting it on your phone man. $7 to not drive to the venue and pick up a ticket, absolutely ridiculous.
20
Saint_Anthony88 3 days ago +6
$7 if you’re *lucky* mine are always at least around $20
6
NordWitcher 3 days ago +28
Where do you usually buy your tickets from these days? I find that there's no real alternative to ticketmaster. Every big and even small concerts are usually sold on the platform. Like I'm sure the artists are hand in glove as well. Metallica was known to be anti live nation or whatever I think back in the day and tickets for their last Summer's concert was starting at like $800 and these were nosebleed seats as well. I've not found a better alternative. And the worst part is that the prices are such c***. Like I'm going to the BMTH concert in a couple weeks and nosebleeds are like $130 after taxes, fees. But the ticket itself is like $99. And say tickets for Florence and the Machine with one big artist is like $300+. And that even goes for smaller venues like History, etc. You will find tickets for $70 but then some artists are like $150+ at the same venue. Very frustrating. There doesn't seem to be any consistency or tiers or whatever. Its just whatever goes and I'm sure the artists are involved in this as well. But yeah sorry for my rant. What's the best place to keep track of upcoming concerts in TO and where's the best place to buy tickets?
28
JemmaP 3 days ago +26
It is pretty shitty -- but I guess there's a note that most artists these days make the majority of their money from touring, because streaming royalties from Spotify et al are really c*** and selling media (digital or physical) is a fraction of what it used to be. The Ticketmaster monopoly \*needs\* to be broken up, but if anyone is getting paid for music, it should be the people making it.
26
NoHorseNoMustache 3 days ago +19
Yeah it sucks when you want to see a bigger act there's basically no way of avoiding TM :(
19
NordWitcher 3 days ago +15
And its the same for even smaller bands especially if its an international band. If its a smaller local band then sure you can buy it directly from the venue itself. But even smaller indie folk artists or just niche artists; its all through TM.
15
NoHorseNoMustache 3 days ago +24
There are other ticketing services like DICE, AXS, TIXR, Eventbrite, etc... that smaller bands and non LN associated venues use. I try my best to frequent venues that use the smaller services, so I end up seeing like Saxsquatch or Flamingosis in a bar in Philly.
24
NordWitcher 3 days ago +9
I've used Eventbrite a few times. Gregory Alan Isakov's concert tickets were sold there but I missed out seeing him.
9
NoHorseNoMustache 3 days ago +5
I've been using them for like...damn over 10 years now because they handle ticketing for Delfest and we started going to that in 2014. Whether or not the venue uses TM is definitely a point that I use to decide if I'm gonna go to a show though. I will go to TM venues but only if it's an act that I really want to see and won't be able to see anywhere else. Like I saw Steve Winwood last year. Great show, glad I got to see it, shitty that I had to pay TM to do it but it was worthwhile.
5
Fit-Let8175 3 days ago +36
Ticket prices are way out of whack. Not that long ago, to see the best bands/performers in the world cost less than half today's "nose bleed" prices for GOOD seats. Inflation? Overhead? Nope! Greed! It's not worth it anymore.
36
HedgeCowFarmer 3 days ago +21
Part of this is artists no longer make significant income from song royalties, it’s all touring and merch sales because everyone subscribes to Spotify.
21
PitBullSoulMate 3 days ago +7
Was going to say this. This was actually the net result of pirating. Services like Spotify or Google Music came about because they offered large libraries for convenient prices and that's ultimately how pirating ended. But so did compensation for creators as their royalties fell precipitously. They, of courseafe up the difference by charging more for touring.
7
preydiation 3 days ago +6
So it's because of streaming, not piracy
6
mostessmoey 3 days ago +7
Some of the increase (a small amount) is due to loss of revenue from record sales. No one buys the recordings they just use streaming services which pay the artists very little.
7
RolloTonyBrownTown 3 days ago +21
I think the original anti-Ticketmaster movement made the company start buying up venues, basically eliminating any ability for a large venue artist to tour without a business partnership.
21
piepants2001 3 days ago +6
> Metallica was known to be anti live nation or whatever I think back in the day When was that, 1988? I used to try and buy Metallica tickets like 10-15 years ago, but they were always at least $200 for the nosebleeds so I stopped trying.
6
luzzy91 3 days ago +5
Metallica collaborated with livenation to move 88k tickets straight to resale sites like stubhub, to make more money lol. Not sure what theyre talking about. Maybe thinking of pearl jam
5
FirehawkLS1 3 days ago +7
I too cannot wait. Ticket prices are obscene these days no thanks to these companies.
7
ekinnee 3 days ago +132
"The verdict could cost Live Nation and Ticketmaster hundreds of millions of dollars, just for the $1.72 per ticket that the jury found Ticketmaster had overcharged consumers in 22 states." $1.72 per ticket. I don't think this is the win people think it is. It seems to me that the stupid prices are fine, you just can't increase that, for example, $300 ticket to $301.72 for no reason. We'll see if the added fees are addressed.
132
alexefi 3 days ago +54
+nothing will be done, or something that will be done will be integrated in price, so ticket prices wont go down. then there is that dynamic pricing.
54
Tall_poppee 3 days ago +30
And all artists would have to do, to make tickets cheaper for their fans, is play a few shows in the same city. Sure, some fans would attend all 3 but most people would just see them once and be happy about it. Pearl Jam did this to f*** Ticketmaster many years ago. I don't know why more artists don't do something like that. Last time I posted this I got told Lady Gaga had too many other things to do than spend 2-3 days in the same city. OK well, I've got other things to do with my money than go see an artist who doesn't care if the ticket seller is ripping off fans.
30
chaiguy 3 days ago +37
LCD sound system did something similar too. Announced a “Farewell” show then quickly added a second date at the same venue. Then a third, then a fourth, and a fifth. Scalpers were left holding the bag, as ticket prices started selling for below face value. Prince did something like it too. He had so many nights at the LA Forum that you could buy face value tickets for like $40 a ticket because he played something like 20 consecutive nights.put on an amazing show too.
37
Tall_poppee 3 days ago +14
Yeah I find it hard to believe the artists have no pull. But there are lots of large venues in my area. And I've seen artists set up a stage in a dirt lot (Mumford and Sons with Old Crow Medicine Show).
14
Southern-Date1588 3 days ago +8
Tom Petty waged war with ticket sellers back in the early 70's and made sure there were a large portion of seats affordable for minimum wage earners ..
8
TheDakestTimeline 3 days ago +5
I went to one of those farewell shows, the big one at MSG. I remember some people being mad but I thought it was so cool to allow more people to experience it.
5
alexefi 3 days ago +13
TM also control artists. yes there big ones like lady gaga, taylor swift, ets, but majority just happy to get a chance at making some $$ from tour, and have very little negotiation power. and with pearl jam it ended poorly for them, and guess who they do shows with now? ticketmasters.
13
F9-0021 3 days ago +17
Because there are only so many days in the year and touring is hard on you. If a band does 5 nights in one city, that's 4 fewer nights they can do in other cities for other fans.
17
NoHorseNoMustache 3 days ago +6
Artists who are big enough to matter have LN promoters and LN controls the big venues that they play in. They *have* to dance to LN's tune or else they can't play big venues.
6
digitalmofo 3 days ago +8
As with anything, they will pay a fine to the government and the people they screwed won't get a single penny.
8
Parahelix 3 days ago +80
This is after Trump's DOJ tried to sabotage the case too. Good video on it. [https://youtu.be/2AQPeTVrGYo](https://youtu.be/2AQPeTVrGYo)
80
kaisadilla_ 3 days ago +36
It's funny because Kid Rock is in a personal crusade against these companies, he felt betrayed that Trump was helping them, yet he's still full MAGA anyway. Because, you know, these people are a cult.
36
zerocoolforschool 3 days ago +58
If the fans would stop paying, this would all go away. People are so unwilling to stand up against major greed. They won’t give up their favorite things, even if it means getting massively gouged.
58
ParchaLama 3 days ago +32
Sometimes they do stop paying. Haven't a couple tours ended up getting cancelled in the last few years because barely any tickets sold? I know The Black Keys cancelled theirs in 2024.
32
Fraegtgaortd 3 days ago +18
I'm one of the fans that stopped paying, I go to maybe one big concert a year now when I used to go to 3-5 (I'll still check out local shows I can see for 20 bucks). Got to the point where I wasn't down to pay $65+ for GA lawn tickets anymore
18
HaywoodJabuzzoff 3 days ago +8
I used to go to 4-5 concerts per year, but haven't seen any since 2024. I hate that we're priced out of more and more of our basic enjoyment every day. Don't even get me started on lift tickets.
8
luzzy91 3 days ago +7
I used to go to 20+ a year. Denver, red rocks, great places to see music. Now I go to 0.
7
Humble-Fish-7070 3 days ago +2129
Yeah no f****** shit. Wake me up when I don’t get hit with $37.95 in bullshit fees
2129
colemon1991 3 days ago +447
I guarantee you they will find a way to keep those fees around. I rented a U-Haul once and they wanted a $15 environmental fee for converting their fleet to natural gas. Not a fee for using a natural gas vehicle, but for a business expense of their own choosing. UberEats added long distance fees and a fee based on how much space your food order takes up. I think one restaurant had a fee that included your tip in the calculations, so you paid them more if you tipped high. And don't get me started on airlines and other places with junk fees.
447
UnNumbFool 3 days ago +166
And the best part about those Uber fees is that none of the money even goes to the driver. You know the person who's paying for that gas
166
maglax 3 days ago +22
People say this all the time, and as someone who drove for them for a bit, it is annoying I didn't get that fee, but I didn't care too much. Its main purpose is to discourage people from ordering from too far away. Like absolutely they should give drivers the money, but honestly, just getting two orders I can get to and back from in 15 mins is worth more than doing one order with a little bit extra.
22
ryufen 3 days ago +12
A big issue I have with Uber is that they always upcharge the menu prices items by 5-10% before you even get the service charges and tip. Like the restaurants adds the instead because it's an Uber or door dash customer. Places like Papa John's also do it but don't apply the menu prices increase if you use their app.
12
Krispenedladdeh542 3 days ago +31
It’s not the restaurants doing it either it’s the app. I placed a pickup order at a local mom and pop Chinese food place through door dash. The owner was there when I went to pick it up and he stopped me to ask why I placed the order through door dash? I didn’t have an answer so he turned the POS system around and punched in my exact order and before door dash but after accounting for tax and tip a $30 order was $45 and change. That’s fifteen extra dollars. FOR A CARYOUT ORDER. No driver fees no mileage literally just for being the middle man. The owner explained that he had no control over that and that he gets no percentage of it. It’s door dashes markup just for listing a local restaurant on their platform. I haven’t used them since.
31
JussiesTunaSub 3 days ago +54
We see this with public utilities all the time. Water company needs to improve it's lines? Gonna need to charge everyone an extra $12 in perpetuity.
54
Davran 3 days ago +51
My town just did this. Sent a letter about the new $10 fee which was adopted to avoid raising rates. Except they did effectively raise rates by $10, you know, because that's how math works.
51
MJOLNIRdragoon 3 days ago +19
>Except they did effectively raise rates by $10, you know, because that's how math works. Yeah, but a lot of people are dumb: $xx.99 pricing, tariff supporters, etc.
19
q0vneob 3 days ago +9
Or they raise their arbitrary delivery fees, so they can claim the rates arent increasing. Somehow it costs more to send that stuff to my house than generate it, and scales disproportionately to usage, which is weird because all the infrastructure is in place. Makes it seem like my power co is sending guys out with buckets of electricity to drop off at my house.
9
LookMaNoPride 3 days ago +8
They used to do this with mortgages. You wouldn’t know what the final numbers were until you sat down and were signing. You’d be so exhausted with the process that you might just say, “screw it,” and go through with it. The government put a hard stop to that. Same with credit card fees. Up until about 2008 or so, credit cards could just add random fees. … that may have been the last examples of our government actually working for the people, or doing something to better the lives of their constituents.
8
1003mistakes 3 days ago +38
Genie is out of the bottle. Venues now know what people are willing to pay for tickets to events. This trickled to smaller venues and smaller events. Gone are the day of c**** concerts and other performances as a new baselines has been established and nobody is going to arbitrarily drop prices back down. 
38
F9-0021 3 days ago +28
C**** concerts were gone the day that people stopped buying music. If music doesn't bring in the money, then touring has to cover itself and the lost income from music sales. The price we pay for Spotify existing. Though to be fair, ticketmaster was already charging stupid fees back in the day, but back then a band like Nirvana could make do on $10 tickets because they sold albums. Nowadays, a band can't get away that.
28
What-a-Crock 3 days ago +8
Hate that you’re right
8
Gerbilguy46 3 days ago +5
Idk what you consider a c**** concert, but in Seattle I regularly go to concerts that are $20-$30.
5
EggNo289 3 days ago +1398
So it only took 30 years to figure this out?
1398
freshness5 3 days ago +725
Pearl Jam was right and they were ignored.
725
Sunna420 3 days ago +262
They tried at least.
262
ZAlternates 3 days ago +191
Couldn’t find a better man.
191
epidemicsaints 3 days ago +66
What was great about that though was it created a sort of pissing contest over whose tickets were the lowest and everything was general admission most of the time. It was crazy going to festivals for $17 a day and seeing bands like NIN in arenas for $22. Double those prices for today's money basically, dirt c****. The shirts cost more than the show.
66
Hrmerder 3 days ago +25
Actually I saw NIN a month ago and it was $65 for nosebleeds and I was lucky to get that but other bands charging $120+ gtfo
25
RPDRNick 3 days ago +108
No, even worse. Pearl Jam were made out to be big greedy rock stars whining that they were the greedy ones.
108
freshness5 3 days ago +9
For sure. Couldn’t remember exactly how they were treated.
9
peanut--gallery 3 days ago +24
Yep…. Ignored….. like an Elderly Woman Behind the Counter in a Small Town.
24
Third_Sundering26 3 days ago +13
It’s evolution, baby
13
HesitantlyYours 3 days ago +11
Jeremy was outspoken.
11
Mypopsecrets 3 days ago +39
Now we'll watch nothing happen about it for 30 more
39
fascistno1hater 3 days ago +38
Which is crazy because the US has anti monolopy laws on the books they are just not enforced at all. Because, Congress and the Judicial branch has been brought off by these corporations and the billionaires that they are supposed to regulate. It also doesn't help that these Congress and Judicial members get to invest into the companies that they are supposed to regulate. If we want to get serious about regulating and breaking up these monopolies(cough, cough Google n Meta) we need to get money and lobbying out of politics. **CRIME AND CORRUPTION BUT IN AMERICA IT'S CALLED CAPITALISM**
38
iamnotexactlywhite 3 days ago +5
they got sued only like a year or so ago
5
LordAlfredo 3 days ago +470
> The proceedings also aired a Live Nation executive’s internal messages declaring some prices “outrageous,” calling customers “so stupid” and boasting that the company “robbing them blind, baby.” This is cartoon levels of villainy.
470
MannersCount 3 days ago +164
From the article: "The employee, Benjamin Baker, who has since been promoted to a position as a ticketing executive..." Live Nation REWARDS this behavior! 😡🤬😡
164
[deleted] 3 days ago +52
[deleted]
52
Richard-Gere-Museum 3 days ago +579
Don't worry folks, they'll get a fine that they won't pay, and you'll get charged more for "regulatory fees" now
579
ProactiveInsomniac 3 days ago +162
Oh it wont be that bad. First there will be a massive settlement where everyone gets 10 cents back. THEN we’ll get charged the regulatory fees
162
Bigkillian 3 days ago +47
10 cents back? The best they can do is 10 cents off your next purchase.
47
thejawa 3 days ago +10
Vouchers for 10 cents off but only good for like 5 total shows and they expire in a week Just like with the Live Nation settlement, getting vouchers for concerts but you could never claim them before they expired
10
The_Sound_of_Slants 3 days ago +12
Well, I'm sure they will appeal this decision first. And try to tie it up in the court system for years more until they find a more favorable appeals court judge. It worked for TJD And then they add "legal fee" to all their tickets.
12
kinisonkhan 3 days ago +88
And only 32 years after Peal Jam testified before congress, that touring without Ticketmaster is impossible. While you can find a smaller venues to host a concert, popular bands would draw way more people than what the venue could hold. You sell 3,000 tickets, but 10,000-20,000 people show up. Police will shut that down because they dont have enough officers to handle large crowds like that.
88
lliIiiiliiIII 3 days ago +339
In other news the sun is bright, water is wet and jeffery epstein didnt kill himself
339
lastskudbook 3 days ago +53
Pope shits in woods
53
physical0 3 days ago +24
Bears wear funny hats
24
Available_Usual_9731 3 days ago +256
You mean a Trust? They formed an old school Trust?
256
bigbjarne 3 days ago +42
This is how capitalism works, capital always accumulates. Marx and Engels wrote about this over a hundred years ago. Lenin later showed that capital accumulates even when capitalism is regulated or fettered.
42
Darlinboy 3 days ago +84
Don't get all excited. The reality is that nothing will change as a result of this ruling.
84
Successful-Citron506 3 days ago +20
The ruling was that tickets were overpriced by $1.72. I’m sure when ticket prices go down that much that everyone will stop complaining.
20
nova8808 3 days ago +28
Im sure instead of doing the right thing and breaking up the monopoly, our politicians will find a way to extort payola money from them in exchange for them being able to maintain the monopoly.
28
JamsJars 3 days ago +66
Watch out for the tiny fee, Ticketmaster. The US justice system is a joke lol. What's the point of declaring them guilty for this stuff but then tack on a fee that basically is fractions of a percent of the profits they made from their exploitation?
66
ZAlternates 3 days ago +17
$100 fine! Booyah!
17
akiba305 3 days ago +14
So they were basically a Cartel?
14
witchspoon 3 days ago +15
Just remember a fine is just a fee for the wealthy. It only punishes the poor.
15
MrLanesLament 3 days ago +23
Pro musician here. Good to see this, but there’s still a lot of work to do. I’m of the belief that major shows and tours should be accessible to local and regional acts; hell, I’d support a law where, to receive government money (like most major venues do,) they’d be required to have local/regional acts on a majority percentage of their shows. Give local artists actual opportunity instead of keeping them exiled to shitty sports bars and pay-to-play clubs that nobody gives a shit about. I could tell an endless amount of stories that would depress you beyond belief if you have any interest whatsoever in supporting local music and/or art in general. Young bands (or their parents) going broke buying on to major tours, hell, significant bands going broke playing well-sold tours because they ended up in situations with money going too many different places, too many hands in the jar. I can count on one hand how many concert venues in the entire f****** USA I actually trust. The same goes for promoters. It’s sad.
23
in2xs 3 days ago +12
Ok let’s show some f’n balls and Paramount ur next!
12
DystopianRealist 3 days ago +10
Break up the monopolies. Fines don't work.
10
IdiotWindow 3 days ago +27
Well Duh! This has been the case for decades. Back in the 80s, the government split up the bell system (AT&T) as a monopoly. I am not saying this wasn't warranted but I certainly have seen many companies eclipse the stranglehold on services once held by AT&T and nothing came of their rise to prominence. Here are companies that got too big (Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Time Warner, Consolidation of broadcasting companies (Radio, news, etc.) While I am glad this action is taking place, how about addressing the other goliaths that... who am I kidding, this argument is pointless.
27
Waffle99 3 days ago +11
Its even worse to look at the food supply and see the consolation. 4 companies own the entirety of meat packing as a reference.
11
elshinsterino 3 days ago +9
And the sky is blue. Even artists have been calling them out since forever. Ticketmaster has hell to pay for being a bunch of greedy cunts. I have no doubt in my mind that they can price events to be affordable, and still make a hefty profit. F*** them for real
9
itssarahw 3 days ago +8
I pay more in fees using their monopoly than any judgment will make them pay
8
Blueberry_Mancakes 3 days ago +7
Now for absolutely nothing of consequence to happen.
7
Mother_Spot3217 3 days ago +7
I hope their CEOs rot in jail but that’s too much to ask for in Nazi America
7
Tomazito70 3 days ago +8
I don’t think I paid Live Nation and Ticketmaster an extra $1.72 for a concert ticket, according to the article. These thieves took at least $200 or more from me when I bought a concert ticket.
8
DartTheDragoon 3 days ago +6
I really doubt this will benefit the consumer at the end of the day. Venues/acts may get a bigger piece of the pie, but as long as concerts continue to sell out there's no reason for prices to come down.
6
Tidalboot 3 days ago +6
The result of this will eventually just be a fine. And the result of that will just be that they make a random small % of people at the company redundant. Whilst the people at the top will be completely unaffected
6
Yserem 3 days ago +5
File that under 'Wow No Shit.'
5
frommethodtomadness 3 days ago +5
Watch as they pay a small 'cost of doing business' fine and keep going.
5
Elegant-Guest7329 3 days ago +5
Where's my muthafucking money Ticketmaster?
5
lilandroidman 3 days ago +7
I once regrettably needed to sell some tickets using Stubhub and the decimal place on the tickets got fucked up, I can't remember the exact specifics but it was something like it should have been £250 as per face each and it ended up being £2.50. So a £1000 set of 4 tickets became £10. To this day I maintain this was not a "me" mistake but had no screenshots or listing confirmations or anything to be able to prove it. I was not sent an email confirming the listing or the listing price. There were no checks or balances to get me to confirm that it was in my wishes to sell a set of tickets for *way below* face value, that no reasonable person would ever agree to do. When they (quickly) sold, possibly the buyer gouging to resell on later, I rang up and informed them of this and told them to void the transaction. They bombarded me with a load of contractual and legal spiel, including that they have a "fan guarantee" and that I must recompense the buyer for up to face value of the tickets for the disappointment of my actions which was essentially a £1000 bill that tried to sucker me into a loophole of honouring the sale. In the end, I ended up having to pay a fee ~£100 to keep it out of court. I was prepared to do the court thing, and the stubborn old goat in me sometimes wishes he had (might have secured some damages for the stress it caused too!) - but in the end I thought for £100 life is too short. Summary - these companies are scum and will do anything to f*** you over! We need to vote with our feet where we can, but is difficult when most of the good live entertainment runs through their dirty little hands.
7
Tenzil422 3 days ago +7
Didn’t Pearl Jam call this 30 years ago?
7
OneSignal6465 3 days ago +4
Isn’t this like, the 3rd or 4th time this conclusion had been reached about Ticketmaster et al? It feels like Déjà vu all over again. I can’t recall when the last time was, but I’m sure I remember a similar shitstorm about TicketMaster at LEAST 2 or 3 times in the past. I thought they had bee found liable for the same thing a few times previously… Am I just misremembering?
4
Nono6768 3 days ago +22
Now do Paramount and FAANG
22
Mistrblank 3 days ago +13
Only took 30 years to figure that out. Most of us knew in the 90s
13
PipChaos 3 days ago +5
The only change will be a new “Court cost recovery fee”
5
zzztoken 3 days ago +4
It’s not even just “big” venues. It’s almost all venues.
4
Nissir 3 days ago +5
Shit I knew in 1999 for 100 Alex.
5
PlateNo4868 3 days ago +6
Good on the states. The settlement with the DOJ was a slap on a wrist. 
6
SaveFileCorrupt 3 days ago +5
Can't wait for my $0.11 class action restitution.
5
Skotch21680 3 days ago +6
I stopped going to concerts about 20 years ago for this reason. I remember tickets for lawn weee only $15 and shirts were only $10 to $15. Beer was only $3. Someone baught me jimmy buffet seats 5 years ago $50 for parking, idk how much the tickets were but beer was $15 each and shirts near $100. Nope!
6
MaleCakar8 3 days ago +6
I’ll take “no f****** shit” for 500, Alex.
6
Mediocre_Bridge_4266 3 days ago +4
THEY’RE THE SAME COMPANY…it’s vertical integration. This is a perfect example of how capitalism does not work for the masses, it only works for the wealthy. Despite the verdict, less than $2.00 in damages per ticket sold is bullshit. Oh, and their statement that the jury isn’t the last word means that Trump will bail them out because Live Nation paid $500,000 to Trump’s inauguration pay to play fund.
4
chrisgilbertcreative 3 days ago +5
Don’t just break them up. Dissolve them. There are many alternatives who don’t screw over their customer base for a living. At some point we gotta give these criminal corporations (and the warlords behind them) the death penalty.
5
LuluNJ420 3 days ago +5
I have vivid memories of waiting in line at my local record/CD store to buy concert tickets. For major concerts, sometimes there would be a line, but tickets were always affordable and always accessible. System for the last decade or so is absolute horseshit
5
One-Accountant-6733 3 days ago +5
They literally let “brokers” AKA scalpers, buy up with bots to create false scarcity then resell on their same website for inflated ads prices. They have zero incentive to stop scalpers from doing this shit because they get a percentage back on BOTH the original purchase and the resale. USA is so behind with a bunch of shit. There’s many European countries that make it illegal to resell tickets for events at an up charge. You literally have to sell them at cost of cheaper.
5
theradicalace 3 days ago +5
in other news, fire is hot and things fall down when you let go of them
5
TwoparentsandAteen 3 days ago +4
So where is the class action lawsuit?! We should be getting checks.
4
← Back to Board