Here we go. Trump will be back to selling classified documents in no time. No surprise his personal lawyer now runs the DOJ and this statement comes out.
1103
Beauty-Girly-66Apr 2, 2026
+165
Atp, people don't trust anything coming out of DOJ and that's the real issue.
165
ShartingEnUApr 3, 2026
+82
People don't trust anything this administration says. Every person that talks to cameras for this administration is lying their aaaes off
82
resgirlhikesApr 3, 2026
+1
my mom believes everything OAN says...
1
Unlimited_BaconApr 3, 2026
+1
> People don't trust anything this administration says.
The core 22% MAGA will believe everything Trump says, and wouldn't care if they learned that they were lies.
1
FrazzleMindApr 3, 2026
+1
I believe Iranian officials statements over anything out of anyone in this afministration
1
VanCardboardboxApr 2, 2026
+9
With regard to the courts [presumption of regularity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_regularity) for the DOJ is gone. This will impact future admins.
In their minds they are. They’ll tell any of their friends or donors anything. The regular people don’t need to be included because we aren’t their constituents. We’re just the cogs that keep their luxury lifestyles running.
305
lundahApr 2, 2026
+157
America is a luxury resort for about 400 billionaires, the rest of us are just staff.
157
NeverLookBothWaysApr 2, 2026
+66
We’re more like cattle really. The millionaires are the hired help.
66
biscuitarseApr 2, 2026
+19
That's so goddamn spot on it brings a tear to your eye
19
Catspaw129Apr 3, 2026
+11
As was learned to me:...
1. Love means never having to say you're sorry ('specially when you've not asked permission to do naughty things).
2. Transparency means sharing classified documents with your friends and business partners.
11
thegamenerdApr 2, 2026
+30
They are pretty transparently Evil, so I guess technically correct. Just not in the way that they mean.
30
NotAnotherBlingBlopApr 3, 2026
+19
Unfortunately they aren't idiots. The peons in the middle sure are, but not the ones actually in charge who are Curtis Yarvin and Peter Thiel. You don't dismantle an entire country in 1 year by being an idiot.
19
ThatPancreatitisGuyApr 3, 2026
+16
Peter Thiel, the Antichrist? F****** moron. Don’t confuse wealth with intelligence. And Yarvin is a third-rate wannabe philosopher. Yes they’re goddamn idiots.
16
NotAnotherBlingBlopApr 3, 2026
+1
Well if they're idiots then this country was built on even less stable of a structure than anyone ever thought if they were able to destroy it this quickly.
1
ThatPancreatitisGuyApr 3, 2026
+1
They had very little to do with it in toto. There are many factors but one of the biggest is the bizarre cult like following Trump has among non-traditional voters. Without that they could accomplish very little. They’re not Machiavellian geniuses, they’re opportunistic cockroaches who got lucky.
1
NotAnotherBlingBlopApr 3, 2026
+1
> they’re opportunistic cockroaches who got lucky.
Hard disagree. They literally built a playbook on how the dismantle democracy. We knew about it. And they still completed it.
The most dangerous thing you can do is write them off as stupid or harmless. Never underestimate evil intent.
1
ThatPancreatitisGuyApr 3, 2026
+1
The blueprint the admin is following is Project 2025 developed by the Heritage Foundation more so than any of Thiel and Yarvin’s blathering nonsense. The ideas they do have aren’t really anything all that novel or that require any depth of intelligence. I do agree they shouldn’t be underestimated but not because they have any particular gifts intellectually.
1
2_Spicy_2_ImpeachApr 3, 2026
+9
More so the people who voted for him for a second and/or third time. The only thing we got wrong was how fast it was going to happen. I figured Iran would have been towards the end of his term or after midterms.
9
Consistent_Sail9251Apr 3, 2026
+9
They’re transparent about f****** over the whole country so I guess they think that counts.
9
CoreyMatthewsApr 3, 2026
+4
FellForItAgainAward.jpg
4
ToginatorApr 3, 2026
+1
I thought the supreme court decided on constitutionality?
1
clueless_in_ny_or_njApr 3, 2026
+2
To be fair, they are the most transparently corrupt administration
2
eskimospy212Apr 2, 2026
+1139
Important note: set your face to stunned.
The presidential records act is the reason republicans said Hillary’s Emails were bad.
1139
DiskSalt4643Apr 2, 2026
+323
Pointing out inconsistency is the thing thats going to work to stop it this time I know it.
323
berfthegryphonApr 2, 2026
+48
Clearly it's going to be a strongly worded letter and an OpEd in legacy media that's going to work
48
gostesvenApr 3, 2026
+12
Well, despite being in the minority in every branch of government the Democrats have managed to combat a lot of Trumps worst “decrees”. Everything from tariffs to deportations have been overturned en masse, dems just got massive concessions to reopen the government, and they’re winning virtually every special election.
12
berfthegryphonApr 3, 2026
+2
It's easy when the courts are still independentish and everything they have tried to do has been blatantly illegal
2
eskimospy212Apr 2, 2026
+20
What silly person would think that?
20
dancingwolpertingsApr 2, 2026
+14
Should we all just ignore the inconsistencies, then?
14
elconquistador1985Apr 3, 2026
+14
We should stop acting shocked and acting like "imagine if a Democrat did this" even matters.
Republicans' only consistent position is to oppose anything Democrats support. That's it. There's nothing deep. There's no logic involved. There will never be a "gotcha" that works.
14
dancingwolpertingsApr 3, 2026
+5
Oh, I’m not shocked at all. The hypocrisy is infuriating. I still think it’s worth keeping a record of it.
5
Ugly_socksApr 2, 2026
+3
this made me chuckle.
3
MadContrabassoonistApr 3, 2026
+1
Hypocrisy is not a bug of fascism, it’s a feature. We can keep calling it out, as long as we understand we’re doing so to keep those already on our side engaged, rather than actually attempting to debate in good faith with the deplorables.
1
Mtshoes2Apr 3, 2026
+3
Me too. I have written down all the inconsistencies in my journal *trap set* and now we wait.... Your move Republicans.
3
Melancholy_RainbowsApr 2, 2026
+20
Sadly the hypocrisy won’t bother them. One of the key tenets of conservativism is that there are strict social hierarchies. Different rules for different people isn’t hypocritical to them, it’s natural and right.
20
ReverendFiveApr 2, 2026
+18
No, the reason they were bad is because Hillary was a democrat.
18
eskimospy212Apr 2, 2026
+12
That was my point.
12
1877KlownsForKidsApr 3, 2026
+1
And a Republican is the reason for the Presidential Records Act
1
mediocre_remnantsApr 2, 2026
+410
That's not for them to decide. The Supreme Court decides.
But now, what will happen is that POTUS shreds a bunch of docs, someone files a lawsuit, it makes it to the USSC, then the USSC says they can't shred the docs and the law actually is constitutional. And nobody will face any consequences.
410
CockBrotherApr 2, 2026
+105
Seems pretty clear to me. The Supreme Court said that official acts supersede all law. So shredding documents, destroying evidence, etc are all official acts. The Supreme Court has - kind of - already spoken on the matter.
105
mcmonkyApr 3, 2026
+15
This ruling coupled with pardon power (and a long list of other toxic shit like Citizens United) is catalytic irreversible oxidation of the democracy that I grew up with and trusted. I fear is that it’s too far gone after only a year+.
15
disparueApr 2, 2026
+24
Doesn't shield anyone that isn't the President though.
24
MasterOfManyWorldsApr 2, 2026
+25
His pardons do
25
f8NegativeApr 3, 2026
+4
It does if directed by presidential decree under their official duties.
4
pegarApr 2, 2026
+9
Official acts deemed official by them are legal. It's not clear especially by the disgraceful justices working for Trump
9
Suspicious_Writer156Apr 3, 2026
+1
You mean SCOTUS.
USSC is not a thing.
1
noageApr 2, 2026
+503
Trump doesn't see himself as a public servant
503
porcelainViceApr 2, 2026
+149
You could argue that mindset is exactly why situations like this keep happening.
149
duckinradarApr 2, 2026
+22
You could argue that he has zero respect for any of the existing structure and is actively trying to replace it with something he likes much better
22
FoxxyFae_Apr 2, 2026
+41
He feels his running his personal company
41
Poison_the_PhilApr 2, 2026
+14
He’s running the country exactly like one of his businesses; into the ground
14
Newscast_NowApr 2, 2026
+24
All those years priming the people by saying we want somebody from business because business people know how to run things helped bring us to this current situation.
24
OdiousAltRightBalrogApr 2, 2026
+9
Well, yeah, he's running the country like he ran his casinos.
9
mister_buddhaApr 3, 2026
+3
They also ignore the fact W was an MBA
3
Amon7777Apr 2, 2026
+8
Yes, and every American, every economic and military asset his to use, abuse, and dispose of as he pleases. This is the what it means to be ruled rather than governed. And in case you still think this is hyperbole, here is saying himself on camera he wishes he were a king.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/white-house-scrambles-to-wipe-trump-easter-meltdown-supreme-court-justices-footage/
8
neutrino71Apr 2, 2026
+53
A few Republicans with spines could fix this. (And stop him from being a public servant)
53
Poison_the_PhilApr 2, 2026
+31
Those went extinct with John McCain
31
mister_buddhaApr 3, 2026
+6
More like Eisenhower
6
stitchface66Apr 2, 2026
+5
wouldn’t that compromise their cash flow/job security?
5
NamuMonjuApr 2, 2026
+4
There are none of those.
4
KahzgulApr 3, 2026
+4
Republicans are only “brave” when abusing women and children.
4
Just1more68Apr 2, 2026
+6
Do you mean MAKE him a public servant? As he should be..
6
neutrino71Apr 2, 2026
+18
I mean impeach and remove him.
18
btrossApr 3, 2026
+2
He can still serve.... time
2
Poison_the_PhilApr 2, 2026
+12
Trump sees the public as his servants*
12
peptic-horizonApr 2, 2026
+3
He sees himself as what the public serves.
3
BigMaxApr 3, 2026
+2
Exactly. He sees himself as an Emperor of some kind, where everything and everyone is there to serve him. He's not there to serve anyone else.
2
localistandApr 2, 2026
+103
So the Trump administration committed crimes related to the Presidential Records Act. Quite the tell by the Trump administration appointees heading the Justice department.
103
turdlepikleApr 2, 2026
+22
If these media companies were responsible, the headlines would indicate "Trump Justice Department". It's no longer some independent branch of impartial public servants. When you read "Justice Department" you are supposed to think of them as a non-partisan group, but every position and statement like this is simply a "Trump" thing.
This isn't the "Justice Department says the Presidential Act is unconstitutional"
This is "Donald Trump and his appointed public servants say the Presidential Act is unconstitutional."
22
default_white_guyApr 2, 2026
+4
We already knew that from Signalgate and one of Rubio’s many joke jobs being Chief Archivist. No need to read in between the lines of legal filings, it’s already out in the open
4
ChiliSamaApr 2, 2026
+44
The Justice Department doesn’t get to say what’s constitutional or not, and Trump still stole classified documents in 2021.
44
HankScorpio4242Apr 2, 2026
+78
I’m sorry…what?
Yes, Congress passed the legislation, but it was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter. That’s how this shit works.
78
palookaboyApr 3, 2026
+1
That doesn’t preclude it from being unconstitutional, though? I don’t think it is, mind you, but that’s not why it isn’t.
1
discipleofchrist69Apr 3, 2026
+1
you're correct yeah. but it's also not for them to decide. they can attempt to take it to the courts though
1
Vast-Butte-FuturesApr 2, 2026
+33
Great. This probably means they haven’t been keeping track of anything.
33
Gandalf-the-GreApr 2, 2026
+31
Actively hiding, more than likely. Remember, Hegseth was using signal chat to plan missions.
31
dubphonicsApr 2, 2026
+44
Just another day in a failed state.
44
yrotsihfoedisgnorwApr 2, 2026
+6
Come on now, we are only a failing state at this point.
6
phosdickApr 2, 2026
+16
The depth of the DOJ's bullshit is truly mind boggling. They seem to be grasping at straws in trying to deflect from the Trump-Epstein files.
16
ianrl337Apr 2, 2026
+12
I think their main gripe may not be classified information, but his phone. Legally those records aren't his and need to be documented. They are also a confession to many crimes he's probably done.
12
daemonescanemApr 2, 2026
+11
The DOJ doesnt rule on whats unconstitutional, thats the judicial branch.
11
hackingdreamsApr 3, 2026
+9
The DOJ doesn't get to make that call. Since when does the Department of Justice think it's the Supreme Court?
Also, why the *f**** does anyone believe the *Department of Justice* should have a say over whether the *Presidential Records Act* is constitutional? It looks like a cover-up, because it's a cover-up. They're trying to burn all the records to do with the Iran war and Putin's direction in real time, huh?
9
MagentaMistApr 2, 2026
+8
What did he steal this time?
8
Routine_Bit_8184Apr 2, 2026
+8
apparently so is investigating presidents that r*** children and traffic them to other rapists for decades.
8
IolausTelcontarApr 3, 2026
+7
The DOJ doesn’t have the power to declare a law unconstitutional.
7
Fulano_MK1Apr 3, 2026
+1
The DOJ ~~doesn't~~ *didn't* have the power to declare a law unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has and will capitulate on all checks against executive power. The Legislative Branch has ceded all its authority and powers to the executive branch. Until we can restore power to one of the two branches of government that has been shuttered, the executive branch has all power to do whatever it wants.
1
JiveChicken00Apr 2, 2026
+7
The present Justice Department is unconstitutional.
7
utlayolisdiApr 2, 2026
+6
Doesn’t matter what the DOJ thinks. Constitutionality is determined by the SCOUS.
6
lost-American-81Apr 2, 2026
+6
They don’t get to make that determination.
6
TwicebakedpotatoeApr 2, 2026
+7
How many documents are they going to destroy with zero consequences before a court rules on this?
7
DingerSinger2016Apr 3, 2026
+3
Don't need to destroy documents if you aren't keeping them in the first place
*points finger to head*
3
UselessInsightApr 2, 2026
+4
Oh, so Donny wants to do even more crime with classified stuff.
Got it.
4
I_dream_ofApr 3, 2026
+5
I don’t think they are supposed to interpret the constitution.
5
whereismymind86Apr 3, 2026
+5
The justice department doesn’t get to decide what is and is not constitutional. They can go to a judge about that, but their opinion is irrelevant
5
Borne2RunApr 3, 2026
+4
"It wasn't required before Watergate, therefore the act is illegal"
F****** baffling.
4
Open_Mortgage_4645Apr 3, 2026
+1
They're in no position to make such an assessment. They're not the judiciary. If they think they have a case, they need to file a case. They can't just declare that it's too hard to comply with a law that every president since Nixon has complied with.
1
onicutApr 2, 2026
+3
It will soon be renamed to the Department of Injustice, to match the renaming of the Department of Defense. Trump lawyers will openly argue that the Constitution is unconstitutional.
3
Odaniel123Apr 2, 2026
+4
They are certainly entitled to their opinion. They will be proven wrong, but they are entitled to their opinion
4
ctguy54Apr 2, 2026
+2
Proven wrong and judged wrong are, unfortunately, two different things with the current supreme church.
2
DASynnthetikApr 3, 2026
+4
Their job is to enforce the law. Congress makes the laws and the Judicial interprets the law, the DOJ does neither.
4
AlJameson64Apr 3, 2026
+5
What's up with this sentence? "To change the law, the Justice Department would either have to file a lawsuit or \*compel Congress to change it\*." Exactly how can DOJ compel Congress to change a law?
5
FrodojjApr 3, 2026
+4
Just a coincidence that the Attorney General, who is also the Librarian of Congress, who also previously defended Trump against violations of the Presidential Records Act in the court of law, which were improperly dismissed by Trump’s hand-picked judge, says the act is unconstitutional. Right…..
4
Automatic_Bus_7634Apr 3, 2026
+1
Since when does the Justice department have any authority to decide the constitutionality of laws?
1
Additional_Quiet2600Apr 2, 2026
+3
So every President can just yack every bit of intelligence they are privy to? Ya that's gonna work out in our best interests for sure. /s
3
Thrashosaurus_WrecksApr 2, 2026
+3
Okay, but I say it is constitutional. Both statements hold equal weight.
3
snowbirdnerdApr 2, 2026
+3
Criminals hate laws.
3
ElysiumSproutsApr 2, 2026
+3
Jokes on them, Republicans are unconstitutional.
3
VulfSkiApr 3, 2026
+3
Not their call to make
3
KahzgulApr 3, 2026
+3
Bondi’s replacement is losing no time fellating Trump.
3
coffeejjApr 3, 2026
+2
Hell. He was swallowing as his name was announced as her replacement!
2
LemmingLouApr 3, 2026
+3
Like f***
3
JayfarianApr 3, 2026
+3
Makes you wonder what else they are trying to hide that has already occurred and that they'd prefer to no leave a trace of..
3
InevitableAvalancheApr 3, 2026
+3
The evil never stops with Republicans.
3
TellTaleTimeLordApr 3, 2026
+3
Most transparent administration in history™
3
cajgolfer87Apr 3, 2026
+3
Most corrupt administration in US history
3
Specialist-Mud4150Apr 3, 2026
+3
Since when does the Executive branch determine constitutionality? Been a while since I took a Civics class but ugh… isn’t that the job of the Judicial branch?
3
alyxandervisionApr 3, 2026
+3
Wasn't aware that the DOJ can determine which law is unconstitutional...
They must be worried.
3
Agentkeenan78Apr 3, 2026
+3
They are saying out loud that they're doing things that they're afraid of consequences for. They wish to operate in the shadows and without any prying eyes.
3
wsrs25Apr 3, 2026
+1
Actually, this is DOJ tacitly admitting that Trump violated the Act when he stole the documents they found in the bathroom at his fleabag resort, which justifies at least some of the investigations he wants revenge for.
1
Carlyz37Apr 3, 2026
+1
OMG
Anything that starts with this Justice Dept says... is total unconstitutional and lying bogus bs
Dems in Congress better find out what documents this administration is hiding RIGHT NOW
1
mtaddApr 3, 2026
+1
Department of Defense was renamed to Department of War. I imagine the Department of Justice will soon be renamed the Department of Corruption.
1
nonymousboschApr 3, 2026
+1
Next: The Constitution is unconstitutional.
1
trystanthorneApr 3, 2026
+1
Here I am thinking the Supreme Court decides what is unconstitutional. Not the DoJ
1
alabasterskimApr 3, 2026
+1
So Trump is criming hard rn
1
Chaos_Theory1989Apr 3, 2026
+1
People dying. Government run by rapists and conmen. Unaffordable everything. Let me die.
1
djevilatwApr 3, 2026
+1
Them.
1
Chrisdkn619Apr 3, 2026
+1
The most corrupt president in history! Nixon rolling over in his grave!
1
Long-Emu-7870Apr 2, 2026
+2
Of course. The constitution specifically states the President can do whatever he wants.
2
MJcorrieviewerApr 2, 2026
+2
I wonder who gave the Justice Department that idea?!
2
jackboner724Apr 2, 2026
+2
So what they are saying is Ronald Reagan violated the Constitution?
2
jared__Apr 2, 2026
+2
they enforce laws, not judge them.... wtf
2
randomwords83Apr 2, 2026
+2
Aren’t there emergency hearings that happen? You’d think this would be one of those times that a Supreme Court Judge figures out a way to stop whatever is happening quickly. Like what the f***.
2
MyFirstCarWasA_VegaApr 2, 2026
+2
And all of his ‘secret’ unrecorded meetings at his private golf clubs every weekend have been what, a complete unknown?
Hint: he hasn't been following the law for nearly a decade and now…..now, you are just catching on?
No wonder he won.
2
Difficult_Self_7769Apr 2, 2026
+2
Color me surprised…*eye roll*
2
MoAngryMILFApr 3, 2026
+2
“I can’t get a ballroom approved. It’s pretty amazing, right? If I was a king, we’d be doing a lot more. I’m doing a lot, but I could be doing a lot more if I was a king.” Donald Trump, April 1, 2026.
2
GhostofKimJungUnApr 3, 2026
+2
I’ve decided that paying federal income tax is unconstitutional, who’s with me?
2
dominantspeciesApr 3, 2026
+2
Remember if you know a republican they are at fault for all of this. All of them. They deserve nothing but scorn
2
Typical_SamaritanApr 3, 2026
+2
They're openly usurping one of the core responsibilities of the supreme court: determining the constitutionality of laws.
2
Pleasant-Ad887Apr 3, 2026
+2
I'm sure the supreme court (what a stupid name) will back them up
2
DownnthehollerPressApr 3, 2026
+2
Well you squirrel headed bastards it's not it's a law, so arrest any individuals who destroy documents.
2
thatirishguyyyyyApr 3, 2026
+2
They used this to go after Hillary's emails lol
2
Bubba_Gump_CorpApr 3, 2026
+2
The zero credibility just fired the AG Justice Department?
2
Jhonka86Apr 3, 2026
+2
Funny, I didn't realize the justice department is the Supreme Court now.
2
Usual-Caregiver5589Apr 3, 2026
+2
"Impedes on the autonomy of the executive branch"
Yeah, dumb ass. Thats the whole point of checks and balances.
2
deepsead1verApr 3, 2026
+2
Paywall, gtfo
2
muffledvoiceApr 3, 2026
+2
The DOJ is trying to enable Trump to make incriminating documents disappear without repercussion. Such corruption.
2
redwing180Apr 3, 2026
+2
Good news the administration is finally worried about what’s in the constitution! I guess from this point forward we can assume that they are going to follow it to the letter. /s
2
MathematicianNo7818Apr 3, 2026
+2
Totally compromises their credibility and my confidence in the judicial branch . So sad. Trump is a blight on America who has contaminated the judicial branch with his narcissistic personality.
2
news_spongeApr 3, 2026
+1
Luckily they aren’t the final arbiter
1
narraukoApr 3, 2026
+1
Justice Dept just making its own court rulings now? That's not supposed to be how it works, but if the checks and balances keep refusing to check and balance I guess he'll get away with whatever.
1
blitz350Apr 3, 2026
+1
Sooo.... we arrest these people now right? Like... impeach, arrest, convict, lock up, throw away key? Surely we are there.
1
TrailMikxApr 3, 2026
+1
So all PDF files will be destroyed, including any paper, voice, electronic trail which ran through white house
1
havacanapanaApr 3, 2026
+1
I had civics in seventh grade. I can say without fear of correction that the Supreme court , not the department of justice determines what laws are unconstitutional.
1
TransitJohnApr 2, 2026
+1
Most transparent administration in history.
1
FrankAdamGabeApr 2, 2026
+1
Same thing the NC Cons did recently. Basically they don’t need to keep records on anything anymore.
1
Independent_Fill9143Apr 2, 2026
+1
Wtf is the presidential records act? Is this something new that Trump is trying to push? Or something old that he's trying to get rid of?
1
damnthistrafficjamApr 3, 2026
+4
It goes back to 1978.
https://www.archives.gov/news/topics/presidential-records-act
4
throwawayhbgtop81Apr 3, 2026
+3
Something old he's trying to get rid of.
3
The_Lloyd_DoblerApr 3, 2026
+1
Where’s the Supreme Court? Oh right, alternating between licking Trump’s boots and kissing his ass.
1
TemporaryNose2173Apr 3, 2026
+2
Drop itching powder in his shorts! That would be interesting to watch!
2
TrendymaroonApr 3, 2026
+1
The Injustice Department.
1
audioblood619Apr 3, 2026
+1
Public serpents
1
TerriblePair5239Apr 3, 2026
+1
The president needn’t have to worry about laws from Congress. It’s an unnecessary burden to his majesty’s administration
/s
1
VengefulWalnutApr 3, 2026
+1
Good luck with that.
1
nonbonumestApr 3, 2026
+1
The file a declaratory judgment action then, and let's find out.
1
mrbeck1Apr 3, 2026
+1
What a f****** joke.
1
heloder85Apr 3, 2026
+1
Yeah but these are the same vile shitrags who are running cover for child rapists. Who gives a f*** what they say?
1
Austin_Peep_9396Apr 3, 2026
+1
“Laws? Laws???? We don’t need no stinkin’ laws!!!”
1
BottlecrateApr 3, 2026
+1
I say I am king of the universe. Same energy and same legal standing.
1
Intelligent-Might614Apr 3, 2026
+1
The lawyer that made that argument should be tried for sedition.
1
ThatOldEngineerGuyApr 3, 2026
+1
The DoJ says a lot of dumb things these days. This is one of those things.
1
darkside569Apr 3, 2026
+1
Know what is definitely constitutional? Deez Nutz.
1
CharlieBravo74Apr 3, 2026
+1
It's amazing how so many administrationa have been reading the plain language of so many laws incorrectly for so many decades. Thank God Trump came along to make us see how laws don't matter.
1
IyellkhanApr 3, 2026
+1
so can we finally all agree OLC memos are not and never should have been binding?
1
KazarSozeApr 3, 2026
+1
I don't understand how many people still support him (and this administration). They are so amazingly corrupt and self-serving and hypocritical it boggles the mind. To sit back and say with a straight face that the PRA 'serves no legislative purpose' when it was written because of Nixon and Watergate so that everything the President does is public knowledge - not hidden away. Now why would someone be opposed to this kind of transparency? "The lady doth protest too much, methinks"
Clearly I'm venting. Back from a holiday with no news/technology only to read about this and new ineptitudes and illegalities. Awesome.
1
TheShocker1119Apr 3, 2026
+1
Too bad they aren't Supreme Court Justices
Otherwise this headline would matter
1
Particular_Ticket_20Apr 3, 2026
+1
Trump might be able to monetize some of it if he keeps it. Some would be evidence if left behind, and the rest might prove what an idiot he was and how he was surrounded by psychotic buffoons.
1
Harry_MudApr 3, 2026
+1
The DOJ is completely full of shit.
1
floopypoopieApr 3, 2026
+1
Yet these maga morons still incessantly post “yeah! I voted for this!!! (TM) along with racist videos of Muslims.
They’re trash, subhuman.
1
NameLipsApr 3, 2026
+1
God it's just f****** neverending.
1
Perfect_Opinion7909Apr 3, 2026
+1
Will there be consequences? No? How surprising.
1
joestanh1Apr 3, 2026
+1
i want to see what a court says not the Departmant of tRUMP says
1
djevilatwApr 3, 2026
+1
According to them everything is illegal, except for what Trump says/does. Nah.
1
disappointedpandaApr 3, 2026
+1
How do the young folk say it: chat, we cooked..?
1
eminembdgApr 3, 2026
+1
From all the files he took from last time, to Epstein files and now all these he'll destroy, there must be such vast amount of stuff he's hiding
189 Comments