This is exactly why the argument, “if you’re not breaking any laws…” breaks downs. Changing the law retroactively like this is the exact reason to maintain privacy, even if you’re not doing anything “wrong”. What’s legal today might not be tomorrow and making laws affect past decisions is a scary precedent.
6528
Guy_GuyGuyMar 16, 2026
+2971
By the way, we have at least one example of a trans person in Kansas who never even changed their sex on their license or any of their legal documents, [and had their license revoked anyway.](https://www.assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/kansas-revokes-license-no-gender-change) The government of Kansas is apparently using some sort of database other than who has actually legally changed their sex, compiled in who knows what way, to determine who's trans.
If you were trans you not only literally couldn't comply with this law if you took action the millisecond the Kansas senate overrode the governor's veto, you couldn't comply with it with a time machine.
2971
NarrativeNodeMar 16, 2026
+1089
Palantir, probably. They must have a whole “shadow database” of everyone with much more info than we ever gave them voluntarily.
1089
Glass-ToasterMar 16, 2026
+375
It's worth noting that in this instance, the person who lost their license previously legally changed their name, so that's probably what flagged them.
Not a valid reason to void someone's license, but it does provide an explanation beyond the database thing.
375
BedRevolutionary8458Mar 16, 2026
+194
people legally change their name all the time, like every time a cis straight couple gets married.
194
adorablefuzzykittenMar 16, 2026
+49
JD Vance can't drive in Kansas.
49
Glass-ToasterMar 16, 2026
+26
Very true. To my understanding, they're making efforts to require passports for voter ID for individuals who have had name changes in the past, including cis women who got married. But I'm not sure that's what's going on in OK.
People who change their name have to submit the appropriate documentation to do so: People who change their name as the result of marriage submit their marriage license. People who change their name for another reason submit *different* documentation, which likely causes them to be categorized differently in government systems.
All that to say, some clerk in OK probably indexed their systems for "non-marriage name changes" and voided them across the board, or something similar.
***Edit: KS, not OK
26
Queasy-Warthog-3642Mar 16, 2026
+25
Be interesting to see if any cis married women got their license revoked. If it was flagged due to nothing but a name change then it would probably effect a lot more people. I have no idea how one could find this info
25
Glass-ToasterMar 16, 2026
+40
I've heard that they're trying to establish a requirement for anyone who has had their name changed to provide their passport as Voter ID.
Y'know. Passports. Those things that *everyone* has and are *super c**** & easy* to obtain. /s
40
Alarming_Jacket3876Mar 16, 2026
+7
And fast. Don't forget how quickly you can get them.
7
NarrativeNodeMar 16, 2026
+27
Thanks! Good info.
27
NotAzakanAtAllMar 16, 2026
+421
That means they can do this for EVERYONE. Not just trans people. Point on someone not doing their bidding, say "trans", and suddenly they are basically not citizens anymore.
You guys are fucked if you don't crush the election, which is ofc being tampered with by the fascists.
Gather your sane friend, family, etc. Organize, stockpile, plan. Right now. And don't do it online.
421
yami76Mar 16, 2026
+113
Yeah, why do you think they said they’d leave Minnesota alone if they handed over their voter rolls, and why they’re trying to federalize elections…
113
QualityCoatiMar 16, 2026
+66
We are so f****** close to the enabling act of 1933 and everybody is doing f*** all about it. The midterms will be the Republicans march election of 1933 and they will promptly give themselves every conceivable powers.
66
IrascibleOcelotMar 16, 2026
+11
To be fair, Dem senators have basically shut down the government and this time, they’re actually holding the line.
11
QualityCoatiMar 16, 2026
+29
That is not fairness in the face of fascism. This is the bare minimum, and they struggle to achieve it. I have great contempt for the Democrats and their spineless cash-corruped asses, and whatever comes out of this decade better be a system with more than two parties.
29
SlowCratesMar 16, 2026
+21
My Facebook was permanently deleted because I disagreed with maga. Their grip on the narrative is tightening.
21
NaturalSelectorXMar 16, 2026
+6
> That means they can do this for EVERYONE.
It's always been that way. The government makes an accusation and it causes the target money and time to fight it.
6
Top-Permit6835Mar 16, 2026
+300
Yeah so in the Netherlands we thought it was a good idea to keep a record on all citizens religious preferences. In 1939. Guess how that turned out.
300
ineenemmerrMar 16, 2026
+73
And still in the Netherlands you have to be registered to get gender affirming care, you have to get registered to get treatment for mental disabilities…
I truly hate the fact that I got registered with autism by my parents when I was young. It still haunts me 30 years later and I’m afraid that being on that list will also mean that I’m one of the first people being hunted down when the fascists take over here.
73
FireMaster1294Mar 16, 2026
+27
Germany still has laws that record your religion. In fact, they even collect your mandatory church donations right from your income to make sure you don’t forget to pay god!
27
NumiskoMar 16, 2026
+10
Are they obligated to donate to churches?
10
KDR_11kMar 16, 2026
+21
You can change your membership at any time and only the major denominations get to collect via the tax system, smaller ones have to beg for donations. Most people simply leave the church to save money.
21
RevolverMFOcelotMar 16, 2026
+151
Especially with the fact that the law can be defined as whatever the hell those in power wanted. Western rule of law double edged sword is that you will be caught off guard when the reality hit that laws are made up, those in power can do as they see fit with law while you still believe that legality is perfect and sacred
People are still playing by the book while the book has been overwritten as you read it
151
Humble_Rough_4962Mar 16, 2026
+21
I agree with you, so please don't be offended, but why state Western rule of law? Are Eastern laws not made up and enforced at the whims of those in power?
Edit: Fixed a typo.
21
minidog8Mar 16, 2026
+13
Yes, I’ve been trying to explain this to people that don’t care. When we change our names and sex on our documents, it’s all legal. None of it misrepresentation or fraud. You present a court order. It’s not secret why you are changing your name or sex. It’s why they were able to immediately invalidate those drivers licenses, they know exactly who has changed their names or sex bc of being trans.
13
GNUGradynMar 16, 2026
+37
I switched to matrix from discord recently. I dismissed privacy nerds urging me to do it before because I have nothing to hide from the government. Didn't really register until the ICE stuff that the situation can change but anything I said previously is set in stone. By waiting for things to get bad I doomed myself. It's an unfortunate situation where you don't care until you're actually affected, but once that happens it's too late
37
MixuAnasaziMar 16, 2026
+32
in this case, it was instantaneous, since there was no grace period :/
32
I-Here-555Mar 16, 2026
+36
The only point of this measure is to hurt people. Why spoil it with a grace period?
36
Michael_G_BordinMar 16, 2026
+83
That argument fails on several grounds. A slave attempting to escape, and those helping them, were breaking the laws. Jewish people were ordered into ghettos and then to camps, failure to do so would violate the law (as would giving them safe harbor). Vagrancy laws were created when settlers wanted to clear natives off of the land by declaring them "vagrants." Drugs laws targeted specific groups by having huge discrepancies in sentencing guidelines depending on the drug.
Watch as this administration finds more and more ways to proscribe normal behavior, necessary avenues of activity, and nominal states of being in order to turn innocent people into criminals. This is the oldest trick in the conservative playbook, going back to the days of kings and emperors. If you want to get rid of someone, find something they do or something they need to do or something unique about them and make it illegal.
But to be clear, this isn't retroactive application of law. They aren't arresting people for having driven before the revocation. This is just a change in the law. For all the breakdown of the rule of law, it still hasn't ever been applied retroactively in violation of the Ex Post Facto rule.
83
kermityfrog2Mar 16, 2026
+100
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread. -- Anatole France
100
MultiGeometryMar 16, 2026
+18
But the State of Kansas issued a legal document of identification and authorization. Thru no fault of the individual and no evidence of administrative errors, those documents became null and void. That’s retroactive application of the law. This law, as terrible as it is, should have only applied to future licenses issued by the state.
18
After_Ride9911Mar 16, 2026
+11557
I’m sure the fact that you can’t vote without a drivers license in Kansas didn’t have anything to do with their decision.
11557
Not_DaijoubuMar 16, 2026
+6033
Per first paragraph in the article: "The law also invalidated birth certificates for those who updated their gender markers" and effective immediately. Very clear what the intention is.
6033
lord_pizzabirdMar 16, 2026
+3190
I think it's more to limit their literal mobility.
When the Nazi's did this it was right before concentration and extermination began. Like the Iran war being rushed, they might be rushing to get this other 'problem' taken care of before it's "too late".
3190
Rare_Trouble_4630Mar 16, 2026
+402
So Kansas is trying to do a multiple things at once:
They are, as you pointed out, limiting their mobility.
They are also trying to erase any government recognition of trans people as they see themselves.
They are disenfranchising them, because you need a driver's license to vote in Kansas.
They are trying to inconvenience and distress them, because anything that needs an driver's license, birth certificate, or other form of state ID is off-limits.
So far, it's all a multi-pronged effort to get trans people to be listed as their assigned gender at birth on their government papers, which can make it easier to identify them.
However, there is also another hidden motive:
This law is a test run for any law that would *immediately revoke any government papers without prior warning.*
If this law is allowed to stand, it would set a precedent, and I would then expect more pushing of legislation and executive policies that instantly revoke the government papers of certain other demographics.
402
lord_pizzabirdMar 16, 2026
+51
The one thing that confusing me about the strategy and when it's been deployed historically is why they'd even want to limit their mobility in the first place.
Say these are undesirables that you don't want in your society wouldn't you want to do everything to enable them to leave.
The nazi's interestingly did the same thing. At first they encouraged jewish people to flee, then eventually refused to let them go. Skip ahead and the logistical burden of the holocaust helped contribute to their military loss, as they had to divert resources to concentration camps, rail transport etc.
Even in the context of genocide doing this is illogical, especially when you can't even extract labor out of the target population.
51
JoanCrawfordMar 16, 2026
+125
The goal isn't to get rid of a group. It's to have a common enemy to punish, and to unite in the hatred of this enemy. Lawrence Britt called referred to it as "Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause."
125
lord_pizzabirdMar 16, 2026
+38
Interesting. And I suppose the logic is that you have to pick a relatively small target group, so that most people aren't effected by it personally, have empathy?
Doesn't get much smaller than transgender people as a population.
38
Seraphim_FayeMar 16, 2026
+34
It also lets them completely manipulate the narrative around these actions. The fact that most people don't really know a trans person, or know about trans people lets them paint whatever picture they want about what being a trans person is or who a trans person is. This allows them to expand the 'scope' that they target as much as they want. Its just like any of their other 'boogeyman' concepts like CRT, woke, or DEI. It can become whatever they want it to be, and encompass any thing they don't like. Its just a new witch hunt, and witch hunts don't just hunt witches, they grant justification to hunt anyone under the guise of being a witch.
34
JavasteamMar 16, 2026
+17
It doesn’t have to be small…. The bigger factor is it has to be relatively powerless.
Thats why the poor can be stigmatized while the wealthy cannot. The trans population is small, but if they had disproportionate power they wouldn’t be targeted.
Historically, various other groups that were targeted would be assigned by race or religion or origin… Catholics, blacks, the Irish, Chinese, Italians (and so on and so forth)… the biggest factor in their being targeted was not having power.
As long as the group has been effectively disenfranchised, it doesn’t matter if the group is large or small (and to be blunt, being too small is its own problem). See apartheid South Africa for an example…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sambo_(racial_term)
17
Theranos_ShillMar 16, 2026
+11
It intentionally excludes them from being able to engage in their local community.
11
RandomG0rl623Mar 16, 2026
+24
You already said the answer yourself. You strip the targeted minority of their mobility so you can kill them once you've realized the logistical burden on removing them is too high. It's illogical because nazis aren't smart. They're morons driven by hate first and foremost, which is why they always lose but it doesn't mean they can't kill a lot of people along the way.
This is a crank on the ratchet towards rounding us trans people up and disposing of us. If this law stands, more red states will follow and we'll be fish in a barrel. Not that we aren't already as it's come out that these fascists having been keeping lists of everyone updating their gender on our IDs in their state.
And I'm not being hyperbolic. The federal government is forcibly detransitioning trans prisoners, which any trans person can tell you is literally an attempt to kill us. If we didn't already have mountains of evidence, the systematized attempted murder of any trans person the government can lock up is proof that the end goal is genocide.
24
TripleJessMar 16, 2026
+3749
Sadly, you may be right about where this is headed. They did this with zero warning, and driving without a license is a misdemeanor that carries up to 6 months in jail.
Guess which gender of jail they stick trans women in?
Prison r*** was already institutionalized before this administration, look up V-Coding, but only if you can take some disturbing stuff. The current administration has moved -3 times- to eliminate prison r*** protection laws specifically for trans women.
And in federal prisons they've begun medical experiments on trans women by halting all gender affirming care, including hormones, and forcing a detransition along with state-run conversion therapy and psychiatric medication.
Far too many of us who end up in there aren't ever going to walk back out, and they know it. They don't want to look like they are getting their hands bloody, but too many of my sisters will die in a horrific way because of this.
..And that's if things don't keep getting worse. I wouldn't hold my breath on that.
EDIT: I just want to tell the people who upvoted this a sincere "Thank you." too often when I or other trans people speak out about this, we get called alarmists and ignored. It means a lot for you to see what's really happening to us.
3749
LASER_Dude_PEWMar 16, 2026
+724
As a CIS father of a trans daughter, I see you and I hope and pray for your and the safety of all trans people out there who are misunderstood and mistreated.
724
an0mn0mn0mMar 16, 2026
+174
As a European, I hope reason, empathy and love for all (except for haters) returns to America soon.
174
Anon_JonesMar 16, 2026
+64
It’s crazy how fear and hate are running America right now.
64
JavasteamMar 16, 2026
+40
Not really. It was always there, Trump just gave them an excuse to let it all out…
40
ShowOff90Mar 16, 2026
+386
What the f***… have we always been the bad guys?
386
An_Actual_LionMar 16, 2026
+524
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
\- A slave owner
It's all been bullshit since day 0.
524
cheesynougatsMar 16, 2026
+146
A slave owner whose response to a nearby state declaring their freedom from Europe was "lol no."
146
hexcraft-nikkMar 16, 2026
+200
I don't think Americans realize that the Nazis were directly inspired by America lol. Specifically our application of segregation. They thought "separate but equal" was genius.
200
MsBlackSoxMar 16, 2026
+146
They looked at our Eugenics movement, the Jim Crowe laws, and race massacres in the 1920s (especially Tulsa) and said, let's do it like that.
146
LarksMyCaptainMar 16, 2026
+72
Its mind blowing that we're only 100 years removed from that time period. I have a bad gut feeling for the future.
72
winter__xoMar 16, 2026
+56
They also looked at the 'one drop rule' and decided it was *too extreme*.
56
move_machineMar 16, 2026
+32
They even thought that Jim Crow laws went too far for even rank and file Nazis to support.
Same thing with "one drop" rules for racial heritability, even Nazis didn't go that far
32
mjb2012Mar 16, 2026
+36
Oh, he meant what he said. It's just that *men* had a particular definition in the 1700s. Women were not men. Property (slaves) were not men.
36
pjjmdMar 16, 2026
+120
So lots of people have been answering you with the simple 'yes you are', and like, you are in your 30s and american, the fact you haven't figured that out yet is a little... well, yeah, America does try moderately hard to convince (some) of it's people that they aren't the bad guys.
But here's one for you, when folks say 'you shouldn't judge the founding fathers by modern standards', you are aware that like, the majority of the US in the 1700s were of the very obvious opinion that slavery was f****** evil, right? Any exposure to the slave trade quickly convinced everyone involved that 'hey, these are human beings, and you are torturing and raping constantly'.
Like, the relevent example I always like to think of isn't 'george washington owned slaves', which you've probably sequestered away in your head as something that is complicated or nuanced. The example I like is 'slavery was straight up illegal in NYC and Philadelphia, while Washington was president, and therefore obliged to live in NYC/Philly.'
Philadelphia and NYC both had special exemptions made for visiting slave owners, where enslaved people wouldn't instantly be freed the moment they crossed the border. But in Philly, if slaves were in the state for more than 6 months, they would automatically be freed.
So Washington had a rotation where every couple of months he had to send some of the people he kept enslaved back to Virginia, and bring new enslaved people up.
This wasn't a person who lived in a time where the moral understanding of slavery was different than it was now. This is a person who lived in a time where everyone knew how f****** evil slavery was, but if you were rich enough, you could get away with it, to varying degrees in different parts of the country. And Washington specifically had to manipulate legal loop holes to keep the state from freeing the people he kept in bondage.
So, yeah, that's the founding fathers of America. It's not 'people who lived in a different moral time', it's 'people who were so rich that they could get away with doing evil shit, that everyone, themselves included, knew was obviously evil, because they were sufficiently rich and powerful'.
That's America. Always has been.
120
arcbeMar 16, 2026
+47
The Epstein class has always been the Epstein class.
47
astrobeenMar 16, 2026
+106
Well, let’s see. We burned witches. We enslaved millions of Africans, raping, killing, and trafficking generations. We slaughtered generations of indigenous peoples. We lynched and burned the towns of multiple generations of black Americans. For a few years we fought Germans while we imprisoned thousands of Japanese and deployed 2 atomic weapons on civilian targets. Then we killed millions of Korean and Vietnamese over an economic system. Then we destabilized most of Latin America and enabled autocracy and narcoterrorists, and then when people fled the violence and corruption we created in Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and neighboring states, we called them “illegals” and put them in concentration camps.
But hey, we gave the world Elvis and Levi’s, so let’s call it even.
106
Unfair-Claim-2327Mar 16, 2026
+43
It would be quite the achievement to actually burn witches. I've never even found one! Burning women alive, on the other hand...
43
AllegoristMar 16, 2026
+37
The burning was mostly in Europe a century or more earlier. In the US we brought it back generations after it went out of style, but we generally hung them.
37
W0gg0Mar 16, 2026
+14
Don’t forget about [pressings.](https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2020/10/the-crushing-death-of-giles-corey-of-salem-1692/)
14
move_machineMar 16, 2026
+18
Don't forget the time-honored tradition of lynching gay people well into the 21st century.
18
TripleJessMar 16, 2026
+206
Maybe not always, but for a long time. They shove biased history books in our faces as children and crow constantly in examples of American Exceptionalism, but when you really begin to peer through the cracks.. Yeah, we have been.
They go a long way to hide that from us, but the new administration is anything but subtle.
206
Light_ErrorMar 16, 2026
+49
The school system I was in heavily emphasized the ills of the US by the time we were in middle school. It really depends on the school system we went to. We even had to do a fake trial to discuss the ethics of dropping the atomic bomb in high school. Sadly, some non-serious kids derailed the exercise a bit.
49
EntertheOceanMar 16, 2026
+71
I'm pretty sure it's always.
71
[deleted]Mar 16, 2026
+86
[deleted]
86
marrMar 16, 2026
+7
FWIW there's no nation that's the good guys, if you want to know who your country really is you have to seek out foreign news and minority voices at home.
7
HelloWafflesMar 16, 2026
+90
Seriously, the number of times I’ve been told to pipe down about my fear of getting genocided on here is heartbreaking.
90
bussythrasher1973Mar 16, 2026
+50
They should rewrite the poem to say "first they came for the trans people, and I didn't speak up because there's really not that many of them and they're really annoying about the toxification preceding imminent genocide, and life will probably be better once they're all quiet". it's f****** misery trying to convince people to see the writing on t he wall
50
TheUnluckyBardMar 16, 2026
+14
So, unfun bit of irony. In the context Martin Niemöller was writing in, they *didn't* come for the Socialists first. They came for the homosexuals first. Martin didn't write about them because he (as a priest) was fine with it.
14
Real-Olive-4624Mar 16, 2026
+63
Just wanted to chime in that they are also forcibly detransitioning imprisoned trans men. I feel like we're left out of the discussion despite us also being impacted by (almost) everything that is openly targeting trans women
63
Narrow-Key365Mar 16, 2026
+7
The really scary thing is not knowing what's going on behind the scenes and how much time we have to take action (ie, leave in my case). I'm leaving in the summer but I find myself every day wondering if it'll be in time to be safe or not. That kind of headspace really takes a toll.
7
throwaway149573Mar 16, 2026
+26
I just wanted to add I know a guy (we are from Canada) who recently went to Kansas for a work training, he spoke with a trans woman who was serving him at a restaurant and asked how things have really been going. She told him that she knows of other trans people there who have been forced into some kind of conversion programs and that it's not being talked about. Obviously not my story so I can't verify the facts but alarming none the less.
26
Accomplished-Run221Mar 16, 2026
+285
It’s to kill them.
285
ShamanigansMar 16, 2026
+206
And people have told me to shut up and calm down for the last year.
Being right doesn’t feel good.
206
SmugShinoaSavesLivesMar 16, 2026
+125
There was an article where Patel named trans people as the number one enemy of the US. That was the last wake up call for people to save money for their exit plans.
Edit : The article https://www.them.us/story/trump-admin-fbi-trans-nihilistic-violent-extremists-terrorist
125
WeenyDancerMar 16, 2026
+66
Yes, this. We shouldn't beat around the bush.
66
swollennodeMar 16, 2026
+241
At which point, they will be unable to get a passport. So essentially stripping citizens of their citizenship. Which then makes them illegals, which then makes it legal to jail them.
Sounds very familiar
241
BalancedDisasterMar 16, 2026
+64
They’ve been restricting our access to passports since day one. They immediately made it impossible for us to get passports that align with our gender until a federal court reversed that. Except at that point, you had to sign an affidavit stating very explicitly that you are trans and that’s why the change is happening.
64
TripleJessMar 16, 2026
+96
Don't forget, ICE is now authorized to detain people who look trans, and deport anyone who's documents don't match or don't meet new government gender guidelines.
96
cribsawMar 16, 2026
+127
If their birth certificates are also invalid, they have then effectively made these people non-citizens. I expect they’ll invite ICE to handle trans people accordingly. America’s Holocaust continues to brew.
127
stilljustacatinacageMar 16, 2026
+28
I'm betting they didn't invalidate their SSNs, though. Better keep paying those taxes to fund your own oppression.
28
West-Abalone-171Mar 16, 2026
+21
Brew? It's been boiling over for the last two years and is now scorched.
21
Ridiculisk1Mar 16, 2026
+36
And all the people who saw it coming were called fearmongerers and conspiracy theorists.
36
cyanescens_burnMar 16, 2026
+65
Is this part of why they keep trying to get voter rolls from states?
Like they want to identify the demographics of those that vote against them, so they can find ways to make it difficult, or impossible, for them to vote?
65
Ne_zievereirMar 16, 2026
+36
Voter suppression, red lining and gerrymandering are national sports of US politicians, and in particular Republicans.
In my opinion, voting should be mandatory. Only way to avoid the multitudinous disgusting tricks that are used to suppress voting in the US. Why the hell are the elections on a working day?!? WTF? Can you make it anymore obvious?
36
PM_ME_UR_CREDDITCARDMar 16, 2026
+11
Here in Australia voting is mandatory, which also means the government is obligated to make it as accessible as possible, and ranked choice voting allows for a much broader range of political parties. You lot desperately need both of those.
11
Comfortable_Ad2908Mar 16, 2026
+400
It's horrible and so depressing
400
billynoy522Mar 16, 2026
+159
We're at war, in more ways than one, they figured the trans phobia worked in 2024 why not 2026
159
AlasPoorZathrasMar 16, 2026
+73
Omniphobia.
Trans people are simply the most marginalized group and conservatives love punching down.
Once the trans problem is "fixed" they'll turn to the rest of the queer community. Then academia. Then liberals, socialists, and other rival groups. Anybody who isn't a Southern Baptist, or doesn't have ancestry from Northern Europe.
The great thing about being given control of the hatred goalposts, is that you can move them on a whim.
73
Silvermoon3467Mar 16, 2026
+10
There isn't really any "then" tbh, they're attacking everyone who isn't like them simultaneously and merely winning at different rates depending on the target.
10
DanteandRandallFlaggMar 16, 2026
+159
The people I know who are leaving are doing it because the Republicans in the legislature have practically criminalized their kid's right to exist.
159
TriGurlMar 16, 2026
+50
Yes it's the republicans faults but it's the dumbass voters who keep those republicans in office in KS!!
50
Several-Opposite-746Mar 16, 2026
+56
They're just getting started. Who's next?
56
Jae_Rides_ApesMar 16, 2026
+63
Austistic and similarly neuro-divergent groups.
63
TrueTinFoxMar 16, 2026
+18
That or they'll focus on the rest of the LGBT community
18
hera-fawcettMar 16, 2026
+12
over to natural camps where they can pick blueberries all day and get in touch w nature or whateve bs they tried to call it
12
B0BtheB0BMar 16, 2026
+3861
Kansas has a population just short of 3,000,000 people. Residents of the state impacted is just 0.005% of the population. It absurd to spend this much time and effort to hurt such a tiny margin of people. Nothing better to do with the states time and money.
3861
uniquely_adMar 16, 2026
+1187
But that’s 1700 less voters for dems?
1187
reala728Mar 16, 2026
+840
Tbh the outrage will probably cause more to actually vote, who may just have abstained.
840
JunkstarMar 16, 2026
+462
Those 1,700 have a lot of loving family, friends, coworkers etc. who will still be voting.
462
RealtrainMar 16, 2026
+365
Can't be taken for granted. I know a few people in that position who still have immediate family voting against them.
365
hypercube42342Mar 16, 2026
+126
Yes, but it does make a difference. My cousin and brother both came out and over time my mom, grandma, and uncle moved left in response. Having someone that close transition makes the flaws in the right’s framing very apparent.
126
grumble_auMar 16, 2026
+70
Conservatives lack empathy for anyone outside of their immediate group. When their immediate group is affected they regularly suddenly "get it" why compassion for others is important after all (at least on very specific topics that directly affect them).
70
BoldestKoboldMar 16, 2026
+11
Biggest fundamental "cause" of conservatism is very small in groups and not giving a shit about out groups.
My personal favorite piece of information I learned over the last decade or so was a study that figured out the people with the most anti-immigration views were literally the people least impacted by immigration, and least exposed to immigrants. The more you met and interacted with immigrants, the less opposed to immigration you were.
Unfortunately too many conservatives are incapable of making generalized positive views. They often assume that the on immigrant or jew or gay that they know is "one of the good ones" and keep their shitty views about "the others."
11
Unknown1776Mar 16, 2026
+93
I guarantee there’s a lot of those 1700 who’s have family/friends that no longer talk to them because of it, and/or don’t care how this effects them.
93
PxyFreakingStxMar 16, 2026
+17
unfortunately for transgender people in kanas, that 1700 might have fewer of those things than you'd hope :\
17
[deleted]Mar 16, 2026
+25
[removed]
25
KarmaticArmageddonMar 16, 2026
+11
The men are (thanks to the manosphere brainrot), but the women aren't.
11
Humble_Rough_4962Mar 16, 2026
+25
*Wave of male voters after millennials.
Gen Z women are still fairly progressive. Gen Z men swallowed the red pill hard.
But hey, most Gen Z men told me they liked Trump because he was good for the economy. I hope that's working out for them.
25
alexlpMar 16, 2026
+71
We can hope at least
71
xvf9Mar 16, 2026
+29
I admire your optimism, but I feel like the way it goes is that the government will treat a minority so terribly that it will drive that minority and their closest supporters to protest, then the media will pick up on the protests and focus on that rather than the actual issue being protested. So the majority of people will be presented with a narrative of “the looney left/trans activists are causing trouble again” and will never even consider the root cause. Then the media/politicians/social networks drives a massive wedge into that issue forcing people to split along an imaginary Trans People Get Special Treatment/Government Gets On With Governing line - resulting in people who would have been sympathetic to the original issue actually siding with conservatives because only one side has been presented as logical and fair.
29
coolmanjackMar 16, 2026
+74
1700 is 0.05% of 3 million (or 0.06% if you round), not 0.005%. You’re off by an order of magnitude
74
LostInLittlerootMar 16, 2026
+178
Just like the sports ban other states are doing. Literally only effecting like a single kid in the entire state.
178
West-Abalone-171Mar 16, 2026
+52
Lots of kids are being effected. Not just the one kid.
Specifically the thousands of girls that are now being subjected to "inspections" to prove they are not trans by the epstein fanclub.
All the women who get followed into bathrooms by men to "protect" them from the trans.
And all the girls being bullied or kicked out for looking too masculine.
52
Infamous-Sky-1874Mar 16, 2026
+84
The law is targeting that one single kid. But there are going to be a lot of other kids caught up in it. Especially when you get hypercompetitive parents, or busybodies that like to cause drama, getting in the mix.
84
stainless5Mar 16, 2026
+49
I don't remember what state it's in but my favourite one is the kid who was told he can't take part in any sports at school(or use any of the toilets) at all Because his original birth certificate was mistakenly listed as female even though it was corrected that day the way the law was written they only accept the sex on the first original birth certificate and won't allow the corrected one to be used.
49
theshoegazerMar 16, 2026
+20
Addressing problems that don't exist has always been a big part of the Republican playbook. Like every attempt at voter disenfranchising, when actual cases of illegal voting/voting more than once are exceedingly rare and the perpetrators usually caught.
20
KhaldaraMar 16, 2026
+107
Conservatives can’t win anything based on their platform or policy outcomes. Thats why all they have is cheating via suppression and nonsensical hate based legislation.
[Literally a historical fact spanning decades](https://archive.ph/20251007061846/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/01/the-gop-just-received-another-tool-for-suppressing-votes/550052/) [updated with paywall bypass]
> In their 1981 lawsuit to stop the RNC from engaging in certain practices at the polls, the Democratic National Committee attested that in a New Jersey gubernatorial election, the RNC had sent sample ballots to communities of color, and then had the names for each ballot returned as undeliverable removed from voter rolls.
> Democrats also alleged that the RNC hired off-duty cops to patrol majority-minority precincts, wearing “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands. These details were enough to secure a consent decree between the two party organizations and the court in 1982, stopping the GOP from engaging in such voter-intimidation practices.
> Except, Democrats alleged, they didn’t stop. The consent decree was updated in 1987 after Republicans created a voter-challenge list of black voters from whom letters had been returned as undeliverable, with an RNC official saying that the list could “keep the black vote down considerably.”
> The decree was modified again in 1990 after a court ruled the RNC had violated it by not telling state parties about its provisions, which had led to the North Carolina GOP sending 150,000 postcards to potential voters listing voting regulations, in an apparent attempt at intimidation. The GOP violated the court order again in 2004 after yet another voter-challenge list targeted black voters.
This is also why McConnell and the entire conservative organization is a cancer with or without Trump, they’ve been making it their life’s work to poison the courts and the entire judicial branch to stop ruling properly.
> The most striking implication of the death of the consent decree, though, may be more legalistic. The expiration date for the current consent decree was set in 2009, and the court by that time had become much more sympathetic to the RNC’s arguments, despite having found it in violation five years before.
> Even though the RNC had proven unable to find a single instance of voter-registration fraud, the court ruled that the party had a compelling interest in ensuring such fraud did not occur, thus paving the way for full clearance on practices approaching voter caging.
> The district court did acknowledge, citing the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Crawford v. Marion Cty. Election Bd, that voter intimidation and suppression were several magnitudes more likely to occur than voter fraud, but also **rested its analysis on its assessment of the future behavior of the Republican Party, as opposed to its decades-long track record.**
Published in 2018. Well thank god lifting court supervision caused them immediately to compete fairly and completely cease with their vote suppression and cheating efforts
Garbage people, electing garbage people because they exemplify them. Then still needing to cheat.
107
LemonwizardMar 16, 2026
+18
If they didn't spend billions getting the media to scare the citizens about imaginary problems, some of those people might start voting based on real problems.
The GOP's core political strategy is to shout non-stop about identity poilitics in order to trick poor white people into voting against their economic interest.
Trans people and immigrants aren't a threat to anyone - but painting them as threats is highly effective for securing power.
18
DoublePostedBroskiMar 16, 2026
+1404
>McCabria wrote in his decision that there isn't enough evidence to show that trans people will face harassment and discrimination if they have to use bathrooms or show IDs that conflict with their gender identities.
They’re absolutely evil people.
1404
EnshakushannaMar 16, 2026
+347
if you ignore all the evidence thats already out there, then there is no evidence!
347
xvf9Mar 16, 2026
+250
Even a generous reading of this decision basically boils down to “let us see some hate crimes!”
250
blifflesplickMar 16, 2026
+33
Stochastic terrorism
33
eronthMar 16, 2026
+32
Even if that *was* true, they just insta-revoked people's license to drive. And I'm also hearing birth certificates were revoked, but I'm more fuzzy on the details on that.
32
NukuhPeteMar 16, 2026
+56
You'd think they'd stop and think about the absurdly larger number of women and men that'll now get harassed because they don't look "womanly" or "manly" enough. Their fear and hate of trans people just hurts everyone.
They say they're passing it to protect women and girls like its a magical barrier on bathrooms that prevents criminals from entering. Now the law encourages women and girls to be harassed if they look too much like a man or a boy.
Better not cut that hair too short! /s
56
Lt_RooneyMar 16, 2026
+26
They do think about that, it's just another benefit to them. Women who fail to conform to their definition of "feminine" are just another sign of degeneracy that must be punished.
26
IthuraenMar 16, 2026
+20
There's no evidence that this discrimination will cause discrimination? I wish being deliberately hypocritical, obtuse and cruel while in a positionof power was a crime.
20
ineenemmerrMar 16, 2026
+6
Forcing them to have ID’s that conflict with their gender identity is the harassment and discrimination part.
A trans person now will be outed whenever they are asked to identify themselves.
6
pixeltackleMar 16, 2026
+1638
> Kansas had allowed trans people to update the gender markers on their IDs since 2007. Then in 2023, it changed its legal definition of sex to be male or female and assigned at birth.
I love it when religious zealots get voted in and then rip away other people's *actual legal documents* and *ability to drive and identify themselves*
**Disgusting**
1638
Civil_Tea_3250Mar 16, 2026
+281
And unfortunately it's not just them.
Trump's administration tried to change the Federal definition of "sex" as 2 genders his first time, thankfully a Judge decided that it was partisan and that there were so many unknowns and people disenfranchised from a sudden change in a definition, and that the Federal Government couldn't prove any attempts at addressing those who would be, they tossed it.
Next time around we won't be so lucky.
281
TristanTheRobloxian3Mar 16, 2026
+44
this has happened to a lot of trumps bullshit and i feel like people need to talk about it more. we also should probably sue the f*** out of kansas on 14th amendment grounds
44
probableigh_notMar 16, 2026
+13
ACLU was on it same-day. But there won't be any recourse for trans Kansas residents for the stress, harassment, and expenditure of time and money this will involve in the meantime.
13
dizzle229Mar 16, 2026
+72
I would hope the takeaway from this whole era of history will be that it's not ok to be stupid.
For such a long time we've operated under the idea that if someone is being an idiot, just don't engage and let them go on their way. That we just have to be patient and progress will happen naturally over time. What we've seen is that, left to fester, stupidity will always come back to cause harm to those who are doing the right thing.
It should not be the burden of decent people to suffer throughout their one and only life so that morons can have their superstitions. Covid was the turning point where I stopped seeing them as people.
Society needs to be structured so that being dumb *hurts.*
72
AlarmingAffect0Mar 16, 2026
+18
Not necessarily hurts (there are many people for whom idiocy is not a choice), but at least disempowers. Unless by 'idiocy' you mean something different than plain 'low IQ'.
Cruelty and malice, on the other hand, should be painful, as a matter of reciprocity.
18
trip6godMar 16, 2026
+768
Imagine hating people you almost never have to interact with irl
768
IndigohMar 16, 2026
+391
The problem is that it's *easier* to hate people you never have to interact with.
Isolation breeds bigotry. If you live in a tiny community and only ever interact with people who look and think like you, you start mistakenly believing that everyone thinks like you, and those who don't are insane.
As Mark Twain put it:
> Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things can not be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one’s lifetime
391
capincusMar 16, 2026
+121
Which is exactly why the right has switched to attacking trans people because gay people had become too prevalent in society to work as a legislative/propaganda target.
121
TristanTheRobloxian3Mar 16, 2026
+20
yep and down the line trans people will become too prevalent too... the only question is what group theyll go for after us
20
NeighbourNoNeighborMar 16, 2026
+17
I wonder if the entire problem is that they have no idea either.
Why do you think they're so desperately attempting to make simply being trans an omnipresent issue? They were running out of people to look down upon in order to make themselves feel powerful. If they lose the ability to abuse trans people, they'll have literally nothing left to feel superior about. Transphobes just literally seem to be going full-mask-off evil out of pathetic desperation at this point.
17
RandomG0rl623Mar 16, 2026
+6
The only way they could find a new subgroup to vilify would be like... idk therians or something? But that doesn't pack nearly the same punch as fearmongering about trans people.
It's probably why the goal is getting more transparently obviously genocidal. There is no new boogeyman after us, this is all or nothing. It doesn't get more obscure than freaking out about \~9 NCAA athletes in the entire country, they may as well campaign against bigfoot or little green men at that point.
6
drunkshinobiMar 16, 2026
+13
The Disabled - People are convinced we are nothing but a waste of resources to keep alive.
The Homeless - Many people think they are lazy, dangerous, criminal, drug addicts that shouldn't be helped because they supposedly choose not to be part of society.
Immigrants - There are always the people that look different and wear different clothes from countries most people here can't pronounce that we label as terrorists or gang members. An easy target as most of us don't seem to have much knowledge or care for any other country. Especially poorer ones full of brown people.
13
GNUGradynMar 16, 2026
+10
I grew up in a tightly knit religious community and a series of culture shocks later I'm a completely different and much better person. I'm just glad I had my "wait trans people are just cis people but trans" experiences as early as I did really lol
10
cribsawMar 16, 2026
+45
In all fairness, I never have to interact with MAGA or Christian Nationalists, and I hate every single one of them with every fiber of my being.
45
jrossthomsonMar 16, 2026
+229
The ACLU is supporting a lawsuit. Send them some money.
--
https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/transgender-kansans-challenge-state-law-invalidating-their-drivers-licenses-and-allowing-them-to-be-sued-for-using-public-restrooms
229
dewhashishMar 16, 2026
+31
i hope a judge throws this shit out. this is a very dangerous precedent.
31
PigFarmer1Mar 16, 2026
+357
So being transgender prevents a person from operating a motor vehicle???
357
Comfortable_Ad2908Mar 16, 2026
+190
Yeah, the hormones make the car explode🫠
190
Anonymous_JrMar 16, 2026
+46
This is true, I left my HRT in the car once and it caused 5 city blocks to vaporize :C
46
cribsawMar 16, 2026
+103
How else are they going to prevent them from fleeing the state? The American Holocaust is brewing.
103
LesbeGoddessMar 16, 2026
+75
The second American Holocaust. So great being a trans woman and native 🫠
75
UselessInsightMar 16, 2026
+524
Stripping the legal documents of a minority group en masse is literal Nazi shit.
524
Crumb-FreeMar 16, 2026
+72
No way, we have checks and balances in this country to prevent it. Oh. Wait a minute..
72
BadAsBroccoliMar 16, 2026
+461
Driver's licenses aren't supposed to be issued based on one's genitals, they're supposed to be issued based on whether a person can drive safely or not.
But revoking licenses for road rage would weed out too many MAGA.
461
McButtsButtbagMar 16, 2026
+29
Wait. Does everyone else not steer using their genitals?
29
Independent_Bet_8107Mar 16, 2026
+348
This is one of the things the Third Reich did to Jewish people in the 1930s.
348
ShakeWeightMyDickMar 16, 2026
+266
And to transgender people, and homosexual people, and black people.
266
RandomG0rl623Mar 16, 2026
+52
They also literally did it to trans people first. And they did it to us before Jewish people.
I don't say that to make this an oppression olympics or anything. I say it to drive home that this IS deliberate progress towards a genocide. We have seen these exact steps before against these exact groups and where those steps lead. There is not analogy or metaphor or comparison, conservatives are trying to kill us trans people while everyone else sits by and watches.
The nazis did this to trans people in 1933. Whatever you think the "good" Germans should have done in '33, you're living it right now.
52
Mighty__MonarchMar 16, 2026
+262
Wow look at that, republicans sidestepping democracy and American values as usual.
262
allisjowMar 16, 2026
+32
Life, Liberty and ~~the pursuit of Happiness~~
It honestly wouldn’t surprise me if Republicans wanted to require political affiliation and religion be added to birth certificates and have them be immutable for life. They’re basically saying your entire identity is assigned at birth and cannot change.
32
m1sterlurkMar 16, 2026
+14
This is very blatantly setting the stage for "cleansing" by creating an easy way to arrest transgender people. The Republican churches that support this are cheering and will never face punishment for imposing their lies as law.
14
morblitzMar 16, 2026
+69
Under 2000 in the whole of Kansas? F*** these cunts are petty. It is such a small, vulnerable population it almost redefines the definition of punching down.
69
FeatherShardMar 16, 2026
+12
These people are dangerous and need to be imprisoned rather than treated like functioning human beings. It's time we stopped coddling them and treating their delusions as if they're valid or they will be the end of our society.
And no, I don't mean less than two thousand trans people.
12
Kaiser-MazokuMar 16, 2026
+13
You know what would be awesome is if we left people alone and let them live their lives.
13
HnetuMar 16, 2026
+60
Kansas lawmakers passed a law to hurt 0.057% of the population, for no reason other than bigotry.
What a wonderful use of their politicians' time. I hate this timeline so goddamn much.
60
Affectionate-Raise67Mar 16, 2026
+10
So 0.0006% of the population. If you consider yourself a Christian and have forgotten what Jesus told us about the Least of These please take a moment and think back to the days when church was (hopefully) fun, Sunday School and learning about Jesus and his love for us and then really take a moment to consider whether or not Jesus would truly want us as a society to pursue these measures. You don't have to understand it. You don't have to support it. But I would kindly ask you to question whether it makes any kind of sense to waste so much time, effort, and resources persecuting such a small percentage of the population. Matthew 25:40
10
Jagg811Mar 16, 2026
+86
Cruel and absurd. Who the heck cares if a driver is trans or not? I don’t.
86
Nearby-Beautiful3422Mar 16, 2026
+77
I'm sooooo glad I spent 4 years of my life in the Middle East "spreading democracy" just for democracy to die here. Awesome.
77
3D-DreamsMar 16, 2026
+92
They just stopped 1700 ppl from voting in the midterms. See what they are doing?
92
UniqueInstance9740Mar 16, 2026
+47
This was a test, and our country let it pass. This is bad enough in its own right. Fascist governments generally start against trans persons and the LGBTQ community. After that is immigrants, then women and citizens they want to disenfranchise.
Please fight this. Human rights are human rights. This tested taking US citizens who followed every law, and rolled things back with NO NOTICE. It made trans people who followed every law suddenly unable to have a legal identity that allowed them to rent a home, hold a job and even drive legally…. It made them “illegal” overnight. The law was effective immediately. This never happens. These people are coming for all of us.
47
anothergothchickMar 16, 2026
+7
I’m trans, but white. It’s vitally important we recognize that POC immigrants are far more under threat than trans citizens right now. Not saying it won’t start, I’m very fearful of that. Who I f****** weep for are POC trans immigrants. There was one story I read months ago about someone who was in an ICE facility saying that the trans people they’d seen in there simply disappeared.
7
Comfortable_Ad2908Mar 17, 2026
+9
BTW: here's a website tracking anit-trans bills in America this year
https://translegislation.com/
9
Tilopud_ryeMar 16, 2026
+17
Oh are those IDs now invalid for voting?
17
McKenzie_SMar 16, 2026
+15
Yes. That's the point.
15
FillMySoupDumplingMar 16, 2026
+52
Remember this when they lie and tell you voter ID is easy and totally fine. All their voter ID laws are based on disenfranchisement.
52
givin_u_the_high_hatMar 16, 2026
+89
Just leave people alone. Life’s hard enough.
89
SulfurInfectMar 16, 2026
+38
Yeah, it's hard because of Republican values and religious zealots. These people are going to keep oppressing others until they are physically forced to stop. They've realized that shame doesn't matter anymore and that they can just bulldoze through social norms. Eventually, they're going to have to be put in their place the hard way like they are trying to do to everyone else.
38
G0rdon-BennetMar 16, 2026
+33
I just dont get it. These are people just trying to live their lives. Why are folk going this hard after people they have never met?!
33
Merari01Mar 16, 2026
+31
It's a fundamental part of fascism.
They have to invent an out-group to demonise as a way to increase internal cohesion in their base, by giving them a common enemy.
This is because fascism is an inherently empty ideology only concerned with power for the elite and it can't rally the base with anything actually constructive like infrastructure or community pride.
Trans people are the perfect scapegoat since there are too few of them to organise any kind of effective resistance.
31
talinsevenMar 16, 2026
+62
People who didn’t change their sex on their licenses also had them cancelled so they have a list of suspected trans people in the state.
62
TaphouselimboMar 16, 2026
+8
All the time and money wasted singling out and oppressing 0.0006 of the Kansas population. Guess it keeps the rabid MAGAs from wanting healthcare or infrastructure and allows the billionaires the 0.000004 of the population of Kansas from having to get taxed.
8
gabacus_39Mar 16, 2026
+150
Your country is an absolute shithole
150
FilecoinLurkerMar 16, 2026
+57
We had some nice nature and resources but those are for sale now too
57
Key_Cow5619Mar 16, 2026
+15
Strange that this happens at the same time Republicans are pushing to enact very strict voter ID requirements at polling places. I could not imagine in a million, billion years that they would ever be using this as a test case to see if they can disenfranchise groups that generally support the opposition with zero notice, as that would be quite terrible in their eyes, don't you think?
15
Rinzy2000Mar 16, 2026
+35
Ah yes, but let us go and liberate the people of Iran from their religious oppression. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄 Give me a f****** break, America.
35
Open_Mortgage_4645Mar 16, 2026
+14
This is so fucked up. I am so sick of these disgusting Christian nationalists ruining other people's lives for the sake of their hate, and belief that their way should be everybody's way. So un-American.
14
HolyToast666Mar 16, 2026
+7
Illinois welcomes transgender people
7
JellyrollTXMar 16, 2026
+64
Like Christ says, kick ‘em while they’re down
64
JRR5567Mar 16, 2026
+13
What are we even doing?
13
jporter313Mar 16, 2026
+13
It’s so weird that they’re trying to force through a restrictive national voter ID bill and then also doing shit like this. Must be unrelated.
13
bogeyproMar 16, 2026
+12
I wonder how many pedophiles still have their licenses in the state of Kansas?
12
another_accountingMar 16, 2026
+15
They figure that's 1700 less Democrat votes.
That's what this has always been about
15
ro536udMar 16, 2026
+33
The party of small government folks. So small they can fit in ur panties
33
CatLightyearMar 18, 2026
+5
For christ’s sake
👏LEAVE 👏THESE 👏PEOPLE 👏ALONE.
5
justaguywithadreamMar 16, 2026
+20
Who does this help?
How does this make America better?
What problem does this solve?
20
ClefairyHannMar 16, 2026
+18
When will people realize that transgender people just want to live normal lives like everyone else? Passing laws like this hurts trans people and helps nobody
18
BigJellyfish1906Mar 16, 2026
+15
JFC just let people live their lives how they want to live them. F*** republicans.
199 Comments