· 153 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 20, 2026 at 4:32 PM

Katy Perry: No Statute of Limitations in Alleged Ruby Rose Sexual Assault, Prosecutors Say

Posted by MoneyLibrarian9032


Katy Perry: No Statute of Limitations in Alleged Ruby Rose Sexual Assault, Prosecutors Say
TMZ
Katy Perry: No Statute of Limitations in Alleged Ruby Rose Sexual Assault, Prosecutors Say
Katy Perry could be charged for her alleged sexual assault of Ruby Rose from 16 years ago if investigators find evidence of a crime ... prosecutors in Australia say there's no statute of limitations that prevents bringing the case.

🚩 Report this post

153 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
LyingFacts 5 days ago +581
Interesting. I suppose, unless there is CCTV evidence then this is likely whether Perry wants it to go forth or settle. The latter opens yourself up further allegations (if true or not) I suspect former, as Perry will likely ‘win’ on the grounds of ‘insufficient evidence’.
581
NiceForWhatx 5 days ago +266
The club is now closed so unlikely there is cctv. It's probably purely going to be off of witness accounts of that night.
266
fhota1 5 days ago +119
This allegedly happened 16 years ago. Witness accounts arent going to be particularly credible anymore either. Thats a big part of why statute of limitations exists in the first place for most things, the reliability of someones memory, even assuming they are 100% trying to be truthful, drops off fast
119
NashKetchum777 4 days ago +35
And/or drug and alcohol consumption... on all parties
35
IceCreamDreamyDreams 5 days ago +141
Which is going to be the biggest problem for Ruby Rose, as her credibility is lacking.
141
cheekbones88 5 days ago +33
There may be other witnesses tho
33
BrooklynLivesMatter 5 days ago +154
Witness accounts a week later are spotty, I'm not sure how reliable they would be twenty years later Then again I'd like to think I'd remember seeing Katy Perry rubbing her exposed genitals on Ruby Rose's face for much longer
154
Stonehill76 5 days ago +64
And don’t forgot the after effect of ruby projectile vomitting. I think that wound possibly be a core memory formation.
64
CallMeKingTurd 5 days ago +56
Even "core memories" are incredibly unreliable, people just don't realize how much they change in their mind over the years and with each retelling. There's a good episode of the revisionist history podcast about it that dives into a long term study that was done around 9/11 where they kept bringing the participants back to retell their stories every couple years or so. There were even instances where they showed participants their own writing from previous years and how different their story had gotten and they were in denial and refused to believe it, accusing the people running the study of forging it, adamant that they still remembered exactly where they were and what they were doing.
56
MolemanusRex 4 days ago +11
Did people ever say “core memory” before Inside Out, a movie literally about how we forget certain aspects of our “core memories”?
11
CallMeKingTurd 4 days ago +6
I've never seen it, it may have popularized it, but the saying definitely existed before whenever that came out. Though technically the podcast and study I was referring to uses the phrase "flashbulb event" which I think more specifically means a memory of something really shocking, whereas people throw around core memory to mean something positive. But either way I think people consider them both something that in general they will "never forget," but it's interesting how overconfident people are in that, and how much they actually do forget or change even major details of it over time.
6
BrooklynLivesMatter 5 days ago +32
Right! I still vividly remember a girl projectile vomiting ravioli in 4th grade and that was... over 20 years ago. Core memory formed
32
CapitalCityGoofball0 5 days ago +15
Only issue you and several of the witnesses around you were not heavily intoxicated then (or at least I would hope)
15
adavidmiller 4 days ago +7
Also people vomiting while drinking a bunch is somewhat less of a formative experience than ravioli girl in 4th grade. I'm quite sure I don't remember every time someone vomited at a bar/party/whatever. Some I do, others not, nevermind the particular details, or accurately enough to be making witness statements about them.
7
ThatWeirdoAtHome 4 days ago +3
I dunno... I got pass out on the toilet drunk and I still remember when and where each roommate puked (AND FREAKING LEFT IT) in the house... ... And made them each clean it up in the morning. Maybe the sheer rage of someone puking INTO a closet made sure I remembered it all. Almost twenty years later and it still pisses me off...
3
Beneficial_Run8042 4 days ago +3
It was a core memory and she even wrote the article about that night: how she was so drunk that vomited on KP’s shoes, didn’t remember anything else, but “nothing horrific happened that night”, though she decided to stop drinking. Obviously, we don’t know what REALLY happened, but with this article and the fact it happened so many years ago and she confirmed she was very drunk…I think prove her accusation could very hard
3
BillyYumYumTwo-byTwo 4 days ago +4
All that means (to a defense attorney who tells the jury) is ruby rose was obviously so intoxicated she got sick, how can we trust her account of what happened? Yeah, others can corroborate the throw up. But can they corroborate unwanted sexual contact? It wasn’t really seen as a big deal back then, it might not stick out in people’s brains as meaningful.
4
RealLoan8391 4 days ago +6
But you’d have to provide evidence to conclude that Ruby puking was due to Katy rubbing her face with her coochie. So, would still need an eyewitness. Someone throwing up in the club isn’t exactly conclusive.
6
NiceForWhatx 5 days ago -1
The whole vomiting thing is spotty too. She said in her essay a year after she vomited on her feet. Now it's she projectile vomited all over legs.
-1
Simple-Box1223 4 days ago
I would have hoped you realised how ridiculous your comment is.
0
Own_Ship9373 4 days ago +9
It’s not ridiculous to call out inconsistencies. Her essay is much more likely to be an accurate retelling of the story which makes her an unreliable witness now in the eyes of a defense attorney and jury, if it goes to trial.
9
Pineapple_Jean 4 days ago +3
It’s civil trial, much much lower standard. Probably will just settle. Almost all claims settle.
3
TheMediumJanet 4 days ago +2
There wouldn’t be enough unsee juice to remove that image
2
fdesouche 4 days ago +8
No offense to anyone, but coming out like that 20 years later, it’s very late
8
Competitive-Desk7506 4 days ago +3
Probably not. Main reason is it’s well known eyewitness testimony on its own isn’t reliable bc of how memory is and it’s been around two decades now so it’s even less likely to be reliable
3
canuck_11 5 days ago +23
Prosecutor means it’s criminal no?
23
Mouette-rieuse 5 days ago +25
Sexual assault is a criminal offense
25
canuck_11 5 days ago +19
Yes, but why would the accused settle then. That implies civil court.
19
UndeadDemonKnight 5 days ago +2
Is it not "Settlement out of Court" which is where, there is some contractual agreement (outside of the court system) where the "Plaintiff" in the agreement "agrees" to/doesnt provide the testimony/evidence to the Prosicutor so there is no way to move fwd?
2
Pale_Possibility5083 5 days ago +53
It’s just hard when you accuse someone after remaining cozy with them for years following the supposed incident but what do I know.
53
AutonomyIsNoTragedy 4 days ago +17
I kept dating a woman who repeatedly raped me for YEARS after she did the first assault on me. I didnt want to admit that it was r*** because people blame you and react how everyone here is reacting making fun and saying you're lying ir that you must have wanted it. Everyone knew her and that she was a "good person" so rather than telling leople hoping theyd beleive me I just ghosted and dropped out of the friend group because I didnt want them dragged into it and attacking me or her I just wanted to move on and not have contact with her and try to pretend that it didnt happen. I hope shes changed but its not my job to make her change or check that she has. Its deeply deeply humilliating to admit that you've been sexually victimised wven to yourself there is so much shame and it is easier to just pretend it didnt happen until you cant pretend anymore. I thought I was "too smart and feminist to ever accept that behavior" and suprise suprise it still happened because its not about the vicitm being stupid or not woke enough to shut abuse down. Rapists dont give a f*** how educated you are how feminist you are or much self defense you've done- theyre manipulative predators and they'll go after anyone they want to regardless and it isnt the victims fault ever I did self defense and all the other stuff but that was only preparing me for the statisically rarest type of sexual attack ( a stranger in public) rather than thr most common which is an attack by a family member or SO in your own home. I hope that you never have to experience this and to deal wirh the aftermath of basically losing everything and everyone regardless of wether you report or not and being blamed for it regardless of how you react or dont react at the time A lot of sexual assault violence like what Katy is alleged to do is PURPOSELY weird /done in a weird way by the Predator because they know there'll be a million people disbelieving that someone seen as desirable would do weird shit like that and arguing that it couldn't have happened that way and blaming the victim
17
Hopeful-Prompt-7417 5 days ago +60
Well this is actually common.
60
cheekbones88 5 days ago +27
Many of Harvey Weinstein's accusers remained in contact with him
27
Im-BackAgain-Babes2 5 days ago +14
Yes, abused people tend to stay with their abuser for a multitude of reasons.. many of which dont make sense to people in healthy relationships... but yes, tell us that you dont understand this reality and logic, without telling us
14
ImpossibleInternet3 5 days ago +43
Not sure what they specifically meant, but neither of you are wrong. People are most frequently abused by people they have some kind of relationship with and generally by people they trusted. This makes things super complicated for the abused person and they do often stay in that situation for longer than is healthy for a myriad of reasons. But the guy you’re responding to is pointing out that it does complicate things from a legal and civil point of view. Regardless of how fair or not it is, it WILL be pointed out by the defense that the person maintained a relationship after the alleged abuse. They will say “if it was so bad, why didn’t you break off that relationship?” The real answer is widely complicated, which is why it works so well as a gotcha question. So it is harder in that scenario, when there is no physical evidence, to allege abuse.
43
Traditional_Bug_2046 5 days ago +19
What are you doing on listnook if you're capable of seeing two points of view at once? Begone with this witchcraft!
19
Pale_Possibility5083 5 days ago +10
Or in the dimension of Celebdom will stick with abusers if they think it means climbing social status until it no longer does and when it finally no longer benefits them THEN they’ll decide to speak out. I am a celebrity. I work with celebrities. I’ve seen first hand how this works and you don’t need me to tell you Rose has proven to be a problem in her own way already,
10
drfifth 5 days ago +3
Pale possibility... Jim Gaffigan is that you??
3
MakingaJessinmyPants 5 days ago +4
What the f*** lol
4
Paris_Who 5 days ago +3
I’m a celebrity too.
3
[deleted] 5 days ago +378
[removed]
378
[deleted] 5 days ago +64
[removed]
64
[deleted] 5 days ago +20
[removed]
20
Fragrant-Vehicle-479 5 days ago +203
On one hand I'm not going to complain that an accusation is taken seriously, on the other I feel like famous and rich men also have plenty of accusations that no one has moved nearly this fast on. In less than a week a case is being opened because Ruby Rose made a social media post about an incident that happened 16 years ago, but no one seems to take anything about Leto seriously despite him having accusations since the 00's.
203
grimmdrum 5 days ago +102
I can’t believe Jared Leto hasn’t gone down yet. It’s well overdue.
102
Fragrant-Vehicle-479 5 days ago +26
I swear to god every time he's in a movie (like constantly) I say "this is it, this is the project that gets him enough attention that it hits critical mass and we have to talk about Leto" and then....nothing. There was even a big round of direct accusations during the lead up to Tron, it was making the rounds again, and nothing.
26
Omarkhayyamsnotes 5 days ago +27
Honestly I feel like the "Me too" movement got killed by Trump, and Jared Leto escaped judgment in the public before #metoo could get to him
27
Omarkhayyamsnotes 5 days ago +20
The key line here is "judgement in the public" which is where Trump comes in. How is the #metoo movement going to seek solidarity with an American public that gave 77 million votes to a man they knew had raped an adult woman? Trump got 77 million votes. Let that sink in
20
Omarkhayyamsnotes 5 days ago +9
There is a reason he is in the white house, and not in prison. He got 77 million votes. 13 million short of the entire population of Iran
9
Malice_Claymore 5 days ago +6
I would think something like that is due to whatever court is dealing with it. Im not disagreeing, but not every court system operates the same, let alone those that work within those separate systems.
6
PossibilityFew5967 5 days ago +10
Ruby rose needs attention that's why she's bringing it up now 
10
kllark_ashwood 5 days ago +8
I think it has less to do with Katy's gender and more to do with the homosexual nature. Katy Perry also has similar stories around men as well. There is something a little more sensational about it being a female on female crime. I think it feeds into that falsely reported stat about lesbian domestic violence rates that people love to talk about.
8
sheissonotso 4 days ago +8
God I hate that rhetoric that misogynists love to throw around. They get quiet when you bring up that most of the DV was from previous straight relationships.
8
Apprehensive_Ad3731 5 days ago +10
No. Its the fact that this happened in Australia and not America. If this happened in America, no one would give a shit and a DA would advise Rose to settle out of court and not waste everyones time. In Australia the government prosecutes all crimes and will pursue ANYONE regardless of their social or financial status, in fact, the higher they are then the more likely it will go forward. The outcome may be something as weak as home detention but that will not change the fact that they are prosecuted and now on a sex offenders list.
10
Pythia_ 4 days ago +15
>In Australia the government prosecutes all crimes and will pursue ANYONE regardless of their social or financial status, in fact, the higher they are then the more likely it will go forward. Hahahaha, no. Australia's justice system also has its fair share of corruption.
15
Fragrant-Vehicle-479 4 days ago +3
Also is this the same Australia that strip searches women and girls at public festivals on a horrifying scale? Like humiliating violating insane searches every time a drug dog even looks your way? Last time I checked the number was like 3000 women trying to find justice. Also the same Australian government that firebombed a youtubers house for exposing rampant corruption in the government?
3
Apprehensive_Ad3731 4 days ago +2
It definitely does
2
Viper61723 5 days ago +5
I think there’s a lot of stuff piling up on here that made the response like this. She’s a celebrity in decline, she’s a woman, it’s a non straight allegation, and on top of all that she’s in a relationship with the former prime minister of a country.
5
DontBuyTheThing 5 days ago +4
I was saying the same thing…when it’s male athletes there’s investigations that take god knows how long but i remember a female basketball player being accused by some women and she was immediately dropped
4
Miserable_Leg3663 4 days ago +17
Regardless of whether she did it or didn’t or is a predator or is “twisted” due to previous relationships with predators (Russell Brand?), or blah blah blah. The reason it is big news now is because she is in a relationship with the ex PM of Canada and Russell Brand is on trial... or so it seems to me.
17
Morganvegas 5 days ago +48
This whole situation sounding like none of my business
48
Stormy_Kun 5 days ago +13
I was thinking the same, yet, here we are 😕
13
WhatTheJessJedi 5 days ago +412
I think Katy has some issues for sure but I don't believe Ruby Rose. She crawls out of the wood work every few years with the same stories and none have ever been confirmed.
412
noturaveragesenpaii 4 days ago +38
Precisely. Remember what prompted her to even speak out in the first place: Katy Perry making a light jab against Biebers use of YouTube in his coachella performance.
38
thatsnotyourtaco 4 days ago +9
Are rose and bieber buddies or something?
9
Sparkyisduhfat 4 days ago +10
I think she’s just upset since they just have the same haircut.
10
thatsnotyourtaco 4 days ago +3
I came back onto this page to upvote
3
maybe-an-ai 5 days ago +181
Agreed, and the whole setup is comical. Katy rubbed her vag on Ruby's face in a club and nothing happened. No fight. No argument. She just sat on it for 15 years. Huh?
181
Shibari_Inu69 5 days ago +118
TBH she probably only sat on it for a few seconds
118
Randolpho 4 days ago +5
I hear tell she vomited on it
5
Seraphem666 5 days ago +38
Well laying on her friend's lap. Like story makes no sense
38
CousinEdgar 4 days ago +9
If that's true, wouldn't that person be called as a witness?
9
ttrash_ 4 days ago +2
I took that as ruby giving her friend oral, and then katy coming up thinking she can join in? it’s the only way I can see this situation happening
2
kllark_ashwood 5 days ago +55
I don't actually find that super hard to believe. It sounds like the kind of grotesque bs hyper privileged drunk people think they can get away with. I do find it hard to believe that Ruby Rose projectile vomited on Katy Perry and no one took a photo of the aftermath. I still think it is possible this story is broadly true. I think this embellishment will hurt her though.
55
WillingLake623 4 days ago +31
The whole thing is so insane I legitimately thought it was a shitpost when I first read it
31
Professor_Nincompoop 4 days ago +21
It’s wild to me that someone would have this take. The whole story seems so implausible, if Katy Perry whipped out her vag in public and shoved herself in the face of a famous model don’t you think someone would have noticed?
21
[deleted] 4 days ago +11
[deleted]
11
SpiceEarl 5 days ago +2
The manager of the club said he remembers Rose throwing up on Perry's shoe, but didn't know of an alleged assault.
2
NiceForWhatx 5 days ago +20
No he didnt? He said he doesn't recall any assault or vomiting incident happening.
20
G1431c 5 days ago +11
I think there were 2 people which were kind of presented as “club manager,” and one said the equivalent of “I don’t remember any assault or vomiting,”  and a second different club manager said “Rose threw up on her shoe.” I was also confused bc what??? 2 managers, or the same one changing his story? 
11
NiceForWhatx 4 days ago +3
There was never 2 managers unless you have a link? The only other person who mentioned throwing up on Ruby's foot is Ruby in her self written essay.
3
G1431c 4 days ago +7
Ah ok that makes more sense then.  I’m conflating two stories.   On the same topic, my thoughts are that the manager would certainly be aware of a scuffle borne from a “forced sitting on patron’s face” incident.   The manager instead says “I don’t recall *any assault*” seems pretty telling.
7
KID_THUNDAH 4 days ago +5
While the friend Ruby was resting her head on presumably watched
5
Kuvanet 5 days ago +7
I believe she did sit on her face, but the underwear part was a bit harder to believe
7
Tibbaryllis2 4 days ago +9
> I think Katy has some issues for sure but I don't believe Ruby Rose. That’s one of the interesting things about watching this all unfold. Prior to this, the general consensus on Listnook seems to be that Katie Perry sucks and they’ll take any chance they can get to dump on her, and now that they have the perfect opportunity they’re like, well Katie Perry still f****** sucks, but only slightly less than Rubby Rose.
9
randomnameicantread 5 days ago +60
Katy Perry is also on camera grabbing a guys d*** without his consent and a different dude accused her of pulling his pants and underwear down at a party without his consent years ago. So there's more than 1 pattern here
60
nonsensestuff 5 days ago +55
Yeah I think people forget Katy used to be quite crude with her humor in her early days —trying to be like “one of the guys”, which was sadly not uncommon for women to try to do to be accepted in certain male dominated circles. I can 100% see Katy doing what is being alleged here, but at the time it would have been seen as gross humor- not sexual assault, so nobody probably thought it was that big of a deal at the time.
55
Responsible-Fox-1985 5 days ago +25
Yeah 20 years ago that would have been just laughed off as a prank.
25
Apprehensive_Ad3731 5 days ago +20
She was married to Russel Brand. She’s very likely used to entertaining him and doing what he finds funny and he would find that funny as f***. They seem to get along and understand each other a lot.
20
jaderust 4 days ago +7
Yeah, this is what it sounds like to me as woman also of roughly the same age as Katy. It’s a gross thing, but I could see her doing it to try to be “funny” and “cool” while thinking she was so clever since Ruby is a lesbian. Like the kind of short sighted not able to read the room humor that Katy Perry is sort of known for. I can think of multiple examples of her just not being able to read the room in the last few years, but she’s always had that problem. It doesn’t excuse what happened, but I can totally see Katy doing it as a “look at me, I’m so funny” thing when Ruby didn’t want it to happen and it’s been bothering her ever since.
7
OneSeaworthiness7768 5 days ago +12
>at the time it would have been seen as gross humor- not sexual assault This is exactly what it sounded like. One drunk friend messing with another.
12
PawPawsLilStinker 5 days ago +4
I was gonna say she sounds like an O-Lineman
4
Hopeful-Elk-6615 5 days ago +23
There has been at least TEN people who were either seen on camera being sexually harassed or assaulted by Katy Perry, or who said they were allegedly sexually harassed or assaulted by her, including a FOURTEEN YEAR OLD BOY. A YouTube vidéo video of Katy Perry on her California Dreams tour in 2011, where you can see Katy inviting a 14 year old boy on stage. She ask him how old she is and he says fourteen, she says it’s cute. She calls him "cowboy" and asks him is name, which she then repeat in the weirdest over-the-top sultry tone, and then asks him if he’s nervous and says this is gonna be awkward because his father is in the audience but she asks him if he has ever been kissed before and when he says no she kiss him on the lips. She then laments that he "didn’t kiss her back". He goes to her and try to kiss her on the cheek but she turns her face to try to kiss him on the lips again, before he backs away In a YouTube video posted in 2011, on American Idol, a judge asked a 19 year old contestant if he ever kissed a girl before, the young man then answer he never even had a girlfriend, and then Katy Perry asks him to come here, to which he says no, but she insists and tell him to "come here right now". When he does, she asks him to kiss him. When he kisses her on the cheek, she turns her head around to get his first kiss. The young man then clarified to the press that he wanted his first kiss to be special and that he wanted to save it for his first relationship and that he would never have kissed her on the lips of his own free will. The video of Anna Kendrick saying Katy Perry "finger-banged" her cleavage in an agressive manner when she was just meeting her for the second time. An article from 2019 saying a TV host named Tina Kandelaki accused Katy Perry of sexual harassment. She said Katy Perry was drunk and groped her and tried to kiss her at a party, and that she acted inappropriately with other people at the party. An instagram post Drag performer Jordan L’Moore said when she met Katy and she learned L’Moore was doing drag, she allegedly tried to forcefully disrobe her, even told her to stop. She said she was bewildered but Katy’s "costume guy" and manager acted like this happened all the time and were just annoyed by it. Josh Kloss, the man who starred in her music video for "Teenage dream", said in 2019 that when he saw Katy Perry at a party in 2012 and went to her to say hello she allegedly pulled out his jogger pants and underwear to show his genitals to everyone around her In a YouTube video posted in 2009, you can see Katy Perry on a variety show telling a young woman (or teenager ? Hard to say) that is standing next to her (I think she is a contestant on the show ?) that her shorts are very short and then grabbing them and pulling them up to reveal the girl’s upper thighs on national television. The girls shriek and then nervously laugh but she looks disturbed and taken aback by the whole thing. A YouTube video where you can see Katy Perry introducing Bo Burnham for a show in 2008 when Burnham was eighteen. Katy Perry uses a flirty voice and says he is "funny" and "flirty" and that "thank god he is finally 18 now". If you watch the clip you can see that there is kind of a stunned silence in the audience, because it is so weird, and afterwards Burnham just kinda sighs and says "Thank you, Mrs Perry…" Katy Perry tweeting in 2010, when Justin Bieber was 16 years old, that she heard he was going to be "here" (don’t know where this is ? Maybe a party ?) and that she "couldn’t wait to tap that" A video of Katy Perry meeting Justin Bieber at a party when he was eighteen. They hug in front of the camera and she suddenly grab his butt, all the while looking at the camera If you don’t believe me just google "D’Angelo Wallace Katy Perry harassment", he made a great video compiling all of the evidence that she has done this for years: all of the videos and articles I cited about are in this video ! I 100% believe Ruby Rose because this is what Katy keeps doing
23
skynetempire 4 days ago +2
Yeah this sounds like the garth brooks holding the victim upside down by her ankles story
2
myheartstopped3984 5 days ago +8
Katy Perry has a long history of sexual assault allegations. Its odd to me that this would be someones response
8
SpookySneakySquid 5 days ago +23
Because it’s coming from a known liar - who has made several false accusations, and paired with the most ridiculous story possible for how the assault happened
23
1man2barrels 4 days ago +7
I don’t believe a word either of them say. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle
7
myheartstopped3984 5 days ago +2
Known liars can still be sexually assaulted
2
Capt_on_Foam 4 days ago +6
The point isnt whether or not they did, its how credible they are and how much we are willing to believe or care. Don't be a liar and people will care about your honesty
6
ShimmiShimmiYah 4 days ago +10
Are you familiar with "the boy who cried wolf"?
10
ninjaninjaninja22 2 days ago +1
which stories? sources? 
1
Perth_nomad 4 days ago +7
In Australia, there is no statute of limitations on this offence or murder or armed robbery…the offences are regarded in the same ‘level’. IGG has been very successful, old cases are now being investigated and prosecuted.
7
Boredneedshobby 4 days ago +6
What happened to the friend that was there?
6
absentgl 4 days ago +6
Ruby Rose is an untrustworthy source.
6
You_are_the_Castle 5 days ago +13
I feel sorry for Justin Trudeau at this point
13
wo0o0o0o0o0 4 days ago +5
Lol why
5
No_Swimmer_8418 4 days ago +7
Na he’s a groper too
7
imjazzedaboutit 4 days ago +18
Ruby is 100% doing this for the attention. She’s not a good person. Not a katy Perry fan, but this is bogus
18
Salt_Sherbert5313 4 days ago +2
i figure... I'm sure Perry is no Pentecostal angel.....
2
imjazzedaboutit 4 days ago +2
Not by a long shot. I’m sure she’s awful 😅
2
-GTX 5 days ago +40
What the f*** is even a ruby rose 
40
2401PenitentTangentx 5 days ago +41
The black guy in The Fifth Element. Duh!
41
Inevitable-Pizza-349 5 days ago +8
Nah uuhh!!!! Never made the connection lol 🤣🤣
8
insanechef58 5 days ago +18
It's actually ruby rhod!
18
Jtfgman 5 days ago +7
Super green
7
EpsoniteK 5 days ago +8
BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT \*flails hand\*
8
Prince_Ire 5 days ago +6
One of the main characters from a 2010s web cartoon
6
milkman163 5 days ago +6
One of the antagonists in John Wick 2. The deaf girl. Unpopular opinion but I thought the 2nd was actually the best.
6
MysticalNinja187 5 days ago +3
IG model
3
Livio88 5 days ago +3
It’s a tangerine, the size of a tangerine.
3
Expensive_Sea_1790 5 days ago +23
Lots of things to dislike Katy for but I didn’t expect anyone to take this seriously 🫩 Guess it’s a slow month for celebrity news
23
Secret-Put-4525 4 days ago +6
I wouldn't trust a word out of ruby roses mouth.
6
Douglasqqq 4 days ago +3
It's a hard line to tread. You never want to put any woman in a position where she feels like she can't speak about being a victim, BUT, Ruby Rose is SUCH a t***, and is exactly the kind of person who would lie about SA, and make the world harder for real SA victims. It's a noggin scratcher.
3
Such_King_2547 5 days ago +28
i really do feel for Katy Perry. she’s done some questionable things but it really has just been non stop piling on her for over a year now.
28
OptimisticRealist__ 5 days ago +9
Youre feeling bad for the persom accused of sexually assaulting multiple people?
9
ClarkeBrower 5 days ago +36
You should probably learn who Ruby Rose is before trying to get brownie points for fake altruism and outrage
36
PossibilityFew5967 5 days ago +9
It's Ruby rose , who even knows if this is legit 
9
xNotJosieGrossy 5 days ago +22
Katy Perry has groped people on camera many times. You can Google her groping Justin Bieber’s ass without his consent when he was 18. It’s not that wild of a leap that she may have done this considering her history.
22
CapitalCityGoofball0 5 days ago +10
Problem is in this case the accuser has her own history of issues including lobbing false accusations publicly. If this was someone else that hadn’t falsely accused others of similar behaviors before then it would be a more credible accusation.
10
ThisI5N0tAThr0waway 5 days ago +5
Yeah, but it's Katy Perry. Someone we know to be capable of borderline vile stuff, it wouldn't surprise me if she had in fact crossed the acceptable line in the past. Although evidence should speak for itself. Edit minor typo
5
AdministrativeDelay2 4 days ago +7
This is so unbelievably stupid.
7
Emergency-Pack-5497 5 days ago +10
So Katy perry is being investigated for one person's accusations, yet Donald Trump who has plethora of evidence and accusations they will not go after
10
Mystic_cookie 4 days ago +5
Australia =/=United States of America.
5
Emergency-Pack-5497 4 days ago +7
You mean Australia > united states
7
Salt_Sherbert5313 4 days ago +2
is this just for money?
2
bigskinnybubba123 4 days ago +2
shes apparently also being blackmailed by the listnook china bot swarm lmao. wtf?
2
Shaggy2772 5 days ago +2
You know you sound SUPER innocent when argument #1 is “it’s too late!”
2
binger5 5 days ago +3
She's still upset she didn't get any lines in John wick
3
Short-Service1248 4 days ago +3
Lol it’s always “we need to believe her” except when it’s someone the internet hates
3
Old_Possession8188 4 days ago +2
It’s crazy to see in some of these comments, how prevalent misconceptions about sexual assault still are. To all of the people who have been through this too, it’s so much more common than people want to believe to be assaulted multiple times in one’s life, by different people. Multiple sexual assaults are common. It’s disgusting but it’s true. Victims of assault are more likely to be assaulted again. Victims of child abuse are at an even greater risk. Having multiple claims of sexual assault should never make someone “less credible”. People should understand this before assuming. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1822699/
2
Anon28301 5 days ago
Who has Ruby Rose accused before? I don’t believe her about Katy but everyone keeps saying she’s accused others but can’t name a single person she’s accused. Does anyone know their names outside of “some director”?
0
MonkeyBoatRentals 5 days ago +18
She made a lot of claims when she got fired from Batwoman and there have been repeated allegations of bad behavior about her so she doesn't have a good reputation. On the other hand the claims should be investigated. As far as I can see there are people who remember Ruby Rose and Katy Perry getting drunk at the club, but so far nobody has backed up the specific claims she is now making. In the past Ruby Rose claimed that she [vomited on Katy Perry's foot](https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2026/04/17/katy-perry-ruby-rose-allegations-australia-news-article/89656916007/), but made no claim of sexual assault.
18
Anon28301 5 days ago +3
Yeah again, I don’t believe her about Katy at all but everytime I see an article like this people say she’s accused multiple people. But nobody can name a single person she’s accused? I’ve had people tell me she’s accused multiple male directors of being creepy towards her, just weird nobody can name a single one.
3
DenseTiger5088 5 days ago +13
The Veronicas: https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/ruby-rose-targets-veronicas-in-scathing-post-how-horrific-you-were/news-story/b7a8fce5521063baea8d7d0cb5a7caba?utm_campaign=EditorialSB&utm_source=news.com.au&utm_medium=Facebook&utm_content=SocialBakers Peter Roth and others: https://decider.com/2021/10/20/batwoman-ruby-rose-the-cw-peter-roth/#:~:text=She%20also%20called%20out%20Roth,not%20make%20me%20stand%20down.” Not sure if there are others
13
starpendle 4 days ago +4
Did anything end up happening or not really? I knew they were rumblings with her on Batwoman, but those allegations seem so insane for nothing else to come out of it if true. Seemed like the rest of the cast didn't back her up. Which kind of feels the same craziness we're seeing here, but shrug.
4
DenseTiger5088 4 days ago +5
I’m certainly no expert on any of this (I just googled it because I had the same question as the person I responded to) but it sounds like in both of these instances, everyone else involved backed up the other side. That’s not to say there’s no way these abuses really happened (wouldn’t be the first time other employees backed up their boss despite real abuses happening) but when you stack up this many accusations and no one backs you up in any of them, it does start to feel a bit suspect.
5
Anon28301 5 days ago +4
Thank you. You’re literally the only person since this story broke that has actually given names instead of just telling me “she’s accused so many people” then ignored me when I asked for names.
4
neatgeek83 5 days ago +1
Extradition treaty with Canada?
1
FloggingMcMurry 4 days ago +1
I don't follow any of this, or them, and I find this wild. Wtf
1
ImpressionFeisty8359 4 days ago +1
Unsure how this plays out. It was 16 years ago.
1
Flimsy-Island-8528 4 days ago +1
I bet they were all coked off their minds and there's no footage so its her word against Katy's and she'll Perry those allegations away.
1
MysteryofLePrince 4 days ago +1
So you're saying corroborating witnesses may have been drinking on the night of the offense?
1
Extension-Fail-1917 4 days ago +1
OMG. Is this nonsense still going?
1
← Back to Board