· 200 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 9, 2026 at 10:16 PM

Keir Starmer: 'I'm fed up' with Trump and Putin affecting UK energy costs

Posted by Vegeta9001


Keir Starmer: 'I'm fed up' with Trump and Putin affecting UK energy costs
CNBC
Keir Starmer: 'I'm fed up' with Trump and Putin affecting UK energy costs
Iran has effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz in the war with the U.S. and Israel, creating an oil supply crunch and sending global energy prices soaring.

🚩 Report this post

200 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
skibbin 1 day ago +2689
I remember when north sea oil and gas was supposed to bring us energy independence. With wind and solar we could get a lot closer than we are currently. Wouldn't it be lovely not to have to care about Russia or the middle east...
2689
GoblinGreen_ 1 day ago +973
The last month we've had days of 90% renewables.  There's some huge new off shore wind farms given the green light too as well as some great new energy storage solutions.  Not just batteries either, but inertia storage which is more efficient.  Check out the goodnewsuk sub. 
973
Sunshinetrooper87 1 day ago +232
that's usually for electricity, which is great but our other energy, including transportation and heating, is largely fossil fuels.
232
NewCrashingRobot 1 day ago +211
70% of passenger trains are electric, with the entire UK rail network being 38% electrified. 22.6% market share of all new car registrations in the UK are battery electric vehicles. All this to say, a push towards renewables makes them cheaper, which pushes other modes of transport towards electricity.
211
Pheeshfud 1 day ago +32
If we kick gas off the grid electricity prices will drop and that switch will accelerate.
32
zosolm 1 day ago +1
Gas prices will drop too
1
Reostat 1 day ago +49
Trains in the UK are insanely expensive. Every day it's "renewables, cheaper than ever!' and some report about how much x country produced. The reality as a CONSUMER though, is continuing to pay out the ass. It sucks. (This is in no way a knock against renewables, build them out).
49
tomjone5 1 day ago +20
I wish we invested properly in rail infrastructure in the UK. It costs me over twice as much to get the train to work than it would to drive, and it takes about 45 minutes longer including the walk to/from the station. Labour talked about renationalisation but not in a meaningful way that would actually address the insane prices and shoddy infrastructure.
20
parsuval 1 day ago +6
With any luck, HS2 will spark a renewed focus on rail travel after its completion. We really do need to shake things up when it comes to rail.
6
barnfodder 1 day ago +73
Almost as if privatisation is worse for the consumer every time it happens.
73
Outrageous_Donut7681 1 day ago +32
Nothing wrong with it in certain markets, but whoever decided to privatise foundational essential infrastructure should be flogged
32
famousbrouse 1 day ago +33
So Thatcher should be flogged then. She privatised Gas, Telecoms, Water, Oil, Electricity, Aerospace, Ports, Freight, Steel and of course Council Homes Rail came later under John Major. Common theme here... Conservatives
33
Eastern_Hornet_6432 1 day ago +6
Here in Ireland I'm still waiting on Fine Gael to deliver on their promise of a referendum to enshrine public ownership of our water supply into our constitution. I.E. prevent our water infrastructure from ever being privatized and sold to, for example, Nestlé.
6
Bruvvimir 1 day ago +8
Completely unrelated statements, but yeah, trains in the UK are stupid expensive.
8
Reostat 1 day ago +4
I meant it in the broader picture of the idea of rising energy costs. But yeah. It's just annoying and I'm ranting. I installed a heat pump at my place which has a massive upfront cost, electricity prices are high despite renewable rollouts and lowering energy costs to producers. Everything is just expensive.
4
Alpacapalooza 1 day ago +75
It's a long-term project, but are there any pushes for modernisation of heating systems with heat pumps in the UK?
75
NewCrashingRobot 1 day ago +84
Yes. In the UK is the Boiler Upgrade Scheme (BUS) provides a £7,500 upfront grant for homeowners in England and Wales to replace fossil fuel heating systems with electric ones i.e. heat pumps. There is also currently 0% VAT on the installation of heat pumps until March 31, 2027. While some energy suppliers like Octopus Energy, British Gas, and EDF offer specialized "Heat Pump Tariffs" with cheaper off-peak electricity rates to lower running costs, and even some mortgage lenders offer cashback for installing energy-efficient tech through approved schemes.
84
djpeesh 1 day ago +63
You do that and then Hounslow council tells you to remove it as it needs planning permission and they aren’t going to give planning permission and to use a gas boiler instead. So that’s 25k down the tube. Ask me how I know
63
JivanP 1 day ago +33
Sincerely, why on earth would a heat pump need planning permission?
33
Ch1pp 1 day ago +15
Listed building perhaps?
15
JivanP 1 day ago +12
That's pretty much the only thing I could think of, but what residence is a listed building? Hounslow Council lays out their criteria here: https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/environment/improving-sustainability-home/9
12
IvivAitylin 1 day ago +8
> but what residence is a listed building? While it's not super common there's plenty out there. You can browse them on a map here: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/map-search/ Just pulling up Hounslow centre there's a couple of residential properties right in the middle, though the commenter is probably talking about one more on the outskirts if they're doing serious renovations. They're a pain to deal with though, since as OP noted it seriously restricts what work you can do with the building, especially if it ever needs maintenance or repairs. (Want to replace the single glazed windows with double glazing? Good luck with that).
8
Stubot01 1 day ago +14
Oof, I was just thinking I’d spring for this. You just saved me 25k 😂
14
adomo 1 day ago +13
Biggest issue we run into in Ireland with similar stock of houses is that the insulation and associated improvements to make a great pump effective are too costly, especially now
13
Letstalkreaper 1 day ago +11
So I love me some heat pumps. I'm not sure how old your house is but mine was built in 1972. I put a heat pump in 4 years ago in a climate that gets down to -35C ambient (-40+ with windchill). I haven't done any insulation upgrades except for windows on the top floor. The first year before we put in solar we came in less expensive than the furnace we replaced. Now that we have solar we save 4k per year. There's a good chance you don't need as many improvements as you think (obviously they would make things more efficient, but they're not necessary)
11
No-Spoilers 1 day ago +7
The real future of heating is geothermal, even on a small scale. Every town could have their own well. There are a couple companies with very promising work towards making it happen in the coming years.
7
TheSylvaniamToyShop 1 day ago +24
Electrification of transport and heating is underway. It is more efficient and economical than using fossil fuels. Structural inertia and FUD are now the greatest barriers to deployment. Norway is now at ~98% BEV for cars, Denmark at ~80%. DK, NL, Sweden are around BEV 20% for nee trucks. Battery electric buses were over 90% of new city buses in a dozen European countries last year. Heat pumps made up 50% of 2025 new domestic heating installations in Germany, and have been the dominant system in Nordics for some time. While some work has been done by the government, more work needs to be done to accelerate the deployment rates here. Structural issues like the cost and availability of public chargers for cars, and reducing the spark gap for heat pumps, spring to mind.
24
Ok_Math4576 1 day ago +8
Electric heat pumps for heating and hot water. Electric trucks and vans for transport. It’s happening elsewhere, wake up
8
Significant_Ad1256 1 day ago +6
Fortunately many of those things are moving to electricity too. I got paid for charging my car the other day.
6
Nebresto 1 day ago +3
How does that work?
3
graffight 1 day ago +6
Tariffs like Agile Octopus from Octopus Energy sometimes dip into the negative, resulting in you being paid to use electricity (as an incentive to take up excess grid resource).
6
wintersdark 1 day ago +5
One way is you use your cars battery as part of the grid - it charges at low demand times and supplies power back at high demand times. It basically becomes an additional battery on the grid. You basically but electricity when it's c**** and sell it back when it's expensive. Edit: obviously, with limits for how far it'll discharge, time constraints, etc etc.
5
DiabolicallyRandom 1 day ago +5
Gotta get on those EV's ASAP. Probably the best place to get them from right now is Korea... or China if you must!
5
pawala7 1 day ago +48
Inertial storage is actually a pretty bad energy storage method, it self-discharges too fast and has limited capacity and scalability. Giant flywheels that need to be perfectly balanced, lubricated and kept in a vacuum to stay close to efficient are really tough to scale. It's useful for stabilizing supply short-term like a capacitor, but isn't viable for storing more than a few minutes worth of energy due to basic thermodynamics. Pumped storage (liquid or gas) is actually the most efficient method we have so far, but is limited by available geography. But for most cases, batteries are still the most practical tech we have.
48
Xalara 1 day ago +19
At this point, it’s gonna be large scale batteries. Modern lithium ion are great except for the fire issues when built at an industrial level. There’s some new chemistries that look to be mass produced soon that, while less energy dense, solve the fire issues and use cheaper materials that are perfect for industrial scale grid storage.
19
pawala7 1 day ago +10
Agreed. Though for now, it's mostly going to be LFP just because mass production is already underway, then maybe Sodium Ion to scale up and cut costs. Then, hopefully at some point we get more breakthroughs in redox flow battery tech.
10
CuriousitySparksJoy 1 day ago +8
I help build redox flow batteries in Scotland! They're a promising technology, there's some massive vanadium flow battery projects in China. Our company is currently building what will be the largest flow battery in Europe once it's complete :)
8
BTCbob 1 day ago +15
sorry but inertia storage does not hold significant amounts of energy. It has some niche cases like frequency stabilization but in terms of Joules/$, hydro is king, followed by batteries.
15
Naomi_Tokyo 1 day ago +10
I'd describe it more as "inertia storage serves an important role in grid resilience but isn't a meaningful form of grid-scale energy storage"
10
Hat_Maverick 1 day ago +5
Uranium fever has done and got me down
5
CV90_120 1 day ago +3
> inertia storage which is more efficient. It's not more efficient than lithium batteries which beat it by 5-10% depending, but it is more efficient than many other storage battery chemistries.
3
robplays 1 day ago +236
Unfortunately, the '80s and '90s decided that tax cuts for the rich were more important.
236
ElbowDroppedLasagne 1 day ago +110
Don't worry, it will trickle down any moment now....
110
hackingdreams 1 day ago +29
Weird that the trickle is yellow, though, huh?
29
skibbin 1 day ago +19
Those shoulder padded suits, Filofaxes and giant mobile phones weren't c****.
19
SomethingNotOriginal 1 day ago +9
I think there was also a decision based on 'i need money now' which the Norwegian Sovereign Fund didn't have to compete with at the same level. Do you think that the gas fields being opened up in the 80's would have been welcomed if everything was going into the state and being sat on rather than spent? This isn't coming from protory (as a swimmer, my favourite stroke forever will be thatchers), but hindsight is always is 20/20. Same reason people rag on Brown for selling off gold when it was at a historic low that a lot of the rest of the world fell , and there was a new literal gold mine expected to open in NI that still isn't to this day, going through nimbyhell.
9
JyveAFK 1 day ago +6
Aye. There's no way at least ONE successive government would have been able to resist raiding the Sovereign funds if needed to top up a budget. Elections would be won by whoever said "Why are we all paying so much and getting so little, RELEASE OUR MONEY!"
6
Historical_Owl_1635 1 day ago +92
Problem is we only ever seem to care about becoming energy independent during a crisis. Hopefully this kicks us up the ass but at the same time if the Strait reopens tomorrow I wouldn’t be surprised if we put it back on the low priority list.
92
davepage_mcr 1 day ago +35
Nah. Ed Miliband has been doing a good job of getting UK renewables back on track after the Tories fucked it up, before this Iran stuff happened. There's just a lead time on getting things done.
35
shoobs5 1 day ago +12
Im usually first in line to critisise the Tories. But during their time they removed coal from the Grid and brought us from ~7% renewables to about 45% renewables.
12
Enough_Efficiency178 1 day ago +11
It started out with a lot of support but they U-turned on that policy and then started hacking it to pieces
11
F_A_F 1 day ago +55
Every time I hear this, I get frustrated because it's not the UK who drills the oil, it's BP/Shell etc. Yes we get to tax their profits but it's not "our oil" it's theirs and they get to sell on global markets.
55
LastTrainLongGone 1 day ago +26
It is taxed at 78% so not a terrible deal for society. Selling on global markets gives those supers more profit which means more tax for UK gov.
26
Alto_DeRaqwar 1 day ago +16
Yeah but the fact they let that tax be used for general funding was a wasted opportunity. Look at Norway and their sovereign wealth fund; that will provide long term benefit to the country. Compared to the one off benefit the UK took which is currently expiring as the North Sea runs dry.
16
augur42 1 day ago +7
If the entire UK housing stock was properly insulated to modern standards it would reduce the UKs consumption of natural gas by about 50%. The UK also happens to import 50% of it's natural gas needs. If only i) better insulation had been written into new build regulations three decades ago and ii) the post build government run external wall insulation scheme hadn't had a 98% issue rate that is going to cost the government a *lot* more than the grants to get fixed because the cowboy builders didn't know how to install it properly. Not that I'm bitter or anything. Same goes for upgrading the national grid, they don't have the trained staff to perform the necessary work to achieve any of the deadlines. The rate needed to triple six years ago to hit the carbon zero 2050 target, and every year it fails to achieve that rate means future years will have to be even faster *or* the target date will move decades further away. Guess which one I'm expecting it to be. The single best option any household can do is get solar+battery if they have the right roof and work away from home during the day. The second best cheaper option is balcony solar, when it gets legislated later this year. C**** panels with self-installation an idiot could manage that provide free electricity during the peak usage demands daytime hours. Oh and decouple the electricity price from the most expensive generation option (almost always gas), otherwise heat pumps are *never* going to be a fiscally better option than gas combi boilers.
7
Sweet-Competition-15 1 day ago +7
It would be lovely not to worry about donnie.
7
SlakingSWAG 1 day ago +7
Energy independance is extra fucked considering Reform is all but guaranteed to be the next government, and they've gone so far as to say they'll literally destroy already existing wind and solar farms for some reason. Absolute dead-end country
7
wdomeika 1 day ago +1092
Trump is already gunning for Starmer. I heard Vance throw shade all over him in a news interview in Poland …
1092
lollysticky 1 day ago +551
Shade from a couch-lover with the charisma of a damp rag
551
ChinaCatProphet 1 day ago +148
And the eye makeup of an 80s New Wave singer.
148
VRNord 1 day ago +27
Maybe she’s born with it
27
BarrelMaker69 1 day ago +35
Maybe it’s Valvoline
35
SkaveRat 1 day ago +6
I constantly expect him to start some card magic trick
6
Trisa133 1 day ago +8
I've never seen any man wear so much makeup or except for clowns and KISS.
8
WesternTelevision579 1 day ago +3
The only man who wears more is Trump himself with his signature orange aesthetic. Can file that one under clowns though.
3
RGJ587 1 day ago +42
Don't ask how the rag got damp....
42
SauronOfDucks 1 day ago +13
He used it to wipe down the couch?
13
Chardan0001 1 day ago +132
Trump is always gunning for Starmer. Loves to compare him to Churchill. Even the f****** Irish PM defended Starmer to Trump.
132
zuzg 1 day ago +79
"He may be a Eejit but he's our Eejit and he's certainly better than that shitehawk"
79
TtotheC81 1 day ago +81
That's the funniest thing about this whole shitshow. Trump is making everyone realise that our inter-European feuds are family arguments compared to the existential threat that America has become.
81
ASVP-Pa9e 1 day ago +23
Ultimately, we're all European and share far more values and culture than we don't. A united Europe is the only way to guarantee safety & prosperity going forward.
23
Acrobatic-Ad584 1 day ago +11
He doesn't seem to get ruffled by it
11
SauronOfDucks 1 day ago +72
I'm hoping JD Vance will come over and give some of our far-right parties the ol' Kiss-Of-Death endorsements he's so good at.
72
OkFix4074 1 day ago +153
this if anything will only make Starmer look more stronger in UK - not weaker !
153
Redpin 1 day ago +88
God knows it helped the governing party in Canada. 
88
kaisadilla_0x1 1 day ago +22
Yup. Since 2025, almost every time a European leader has clashed with the US, that leader has gone up in the polls. Trump and the GOP are radioactive in Europe right now, even the parties they support here have to mark distance with them.
22
RexLatro 1 day ago +52
Worked for us in Canada, apparently most people threatened by the US tend to vote strongly against parties that want to imitate him
52
cardew-vascular 1 day ago +31
I did enjoy the last few months of no fucks to give Trudeau. He went from measured statements to I'm done I can do and say what I want. I wonder if Starmer feels the writing on the wall here.
31
OkCaterpillar8941 1 day ago +4
We have local elections in May so it will be interesting to see what happens.
4
BasicFishOutOfWater 1 day ago +4
Go figure!
4
waltz_with_potatoes 1 day ago +35
Because Vance is in thiels pocket and Thiel wants reform in power.
35
ITAdministratorHB 1 day ago +7
Trump has had a hate-boner for Starmer ever since it came out that Labour was trying to help Kamala and the democrats in the previous election.
7
Acrobatic-Ad584 1 day ago +9
Yes, some members of labour party went handing out leaflets for Kamala. Just like Vance interfering in Hungary!
9
monkeybawz 1 day ago +11
Trump is the best thing to happen to starmer. Before this, starmer was a useless bag of shit in a grey suit. Trump has made him look like a statesman for the ages.
11
clipse270 1 day ago +851
MI6 could probably find the Epstein files
851
Kukukichu 1 day ago +375
Probably already has them
375
Broken_Reality 1 day ago +97
Yeah we sent James Bond to the island to infiltrate the paedophile ring and he had P**** Galore. Oh the old Bond movie female names were so bad lol.
97
AdCreepy5165 1 day ago +16
You think the names where bad, then maybe you haven't seen how they were portrayed in the movies. They were sex symbols, and everyone knew it. The teen snow bunny who kept trying to get in bonds pants was the height of it.
16
Furthur_slimeking 1 day ago +13
What? That's a perfectly normal name, and my friend Fanny Cummings agrees.
13
downtofinance 1 day ago +8
Probably why Andrew got tossed out on his ass.
8
ebles 1 day ago +100
Epstein was friends with the late Queen's favourite son. They probably have their own files.
100
Scioptic- 1 day ago +35
I imagine they've already got them. Plus ol' Charlie's going to be pissed at members of his own family being dragged through the mud (as they should be) - so why no retaliation by leaking the full thing to piss off the yanks? My own conspiracy theory is that I bet someone in the security service has probably briefed him along the lines of "if we do that, it'll be worse in the long run, because there's even more terrible things about royals in there that hasn't yet been revealed."
35
ShortStoryIntros 1 day ago +7
ahh the old adage of trading dirt, as long as you don't get any mud on you
7
jert3 1 day ago +12
Most of the world's intelligence services service the billionaire/vampire class at this point. Protecting a nation from a leadership compromised by a child sex abuse operation isn't exactly a priority. If anything, releasing the files would be bad for stability, and their owners.
12
helpnxt 1 day ago +7
Be really fun if Mandelson or Andrew just happened to name a name
7
Pillowsmeller18 1 day ago +7
MI6 had evidence of Trump running for president in 2016 with the help of Russians. CIA just dropped the ball call bullshit.
7
tristan1616 1 day ago +8
Next James Bond movie plot
8
Super-Nuntendo 1 day ago +1
Won't do anything, as there are British politicians and royal family links in there too
1
konq 1 day ago +5
if they had them, we'd have seen them. No way they'd just take trump shitting all over the UK the past month if they had leverage like that. My money is on no one has them. Some people have said Israel has them, but if that was the case, there would be no attempts from Trump to have any kind of Iran ceasefire. The most incriminating files were shredded years ago.
5
Heisenbergg55 1 day ago +736
K. Starmer saying he's "fed up" is the most honest thing a Western leader has said in months The UK has ZERO leverage over any of the three variables wrecking its energy market right now: Trump's foreign policy, Putin's gas taps and whether a ceasefire in the Gulf holds for another week That's a brutal position for any PM to be in The Lebanon criticism is notable though Starmer publicly calling Israeli strikes "wrong" during an active ceasefire is a harder line than most NATO leaders will touch
736
LDNVoice 1 day ago +78
Holds? Didn't it already get broken lmao
78
Woffingshire 1 day ago +50
Well *technically* Israel wasn't named in the ceasefire so weren't part of it so the US - Iran ceasefire is still unbroken... *Technically*... According to Israel...
50
major_hyman 1 day ago +33
Except That’s not what the Pakistanis said who brokered the deal. They were included and so was Lebanon a part of it the deal.
33
SnooPuppers8698 1 day ago +21
you cant just include a country in a ceasefire without them agreeing lmao wtf
21
Woffingshire 1 day ago +8
I know, which is why *technically* the ceasefire hasn't been broken even though the war has carried on as normal. The whole ceasefire is completely moot at this point but *technically* hasn't been broken
8
SnooPuppers8698 1 day ago +6
if iran has stopped lobbing missiles at american bases, it hasnt carried on as normal imo.
6
punninglinguist 1 day ago +7
I'm not an international diplomacy buff. Is it normal to go through all that effort and not get anything in writing?
7
KrisKat93 1 day ago +17
Well no but I guess that's what happens when diplomacy only happens in frantic phone calls during the last two hours of an arbitrary deadline because one side went psycho threatening to genocide the other.
17
rabidstoat 1 day ago +4
We apparently document things in tweets and "truths" these days, from what I can tell.
4
MiniGiantSpaceHams 1 day ago +5
Ceasefires are often chaotic to start. There's usually some violations for a few hours or days until things settle. Doesn't necessarily mean it won't end up holding up, but doesn't mean it will either. We shall see.
5
rabidstoat 1 day ago +9
Though that's true, we're past the first 24 hours. And usually, the rockiness of the first 4 to 24 hours is a result of orders trickling through to the lowest level of control, especially if there's a 'mosaic' structure like with Iran. But Israel wasn't accidentally firing missiles because they were still trying to get everything in order after the cease fire. They were firing missiles because they rejected the cease fire as it applied to Lebanon.
9
Darkone539 1 day ago +56
>The UK has ZERO leverage over any of the three variables wrecking its energy market right now: Oddly enough they kind of do. There's a reason trump is so focused on the uk. Without uk bases they found their bombing runs doubled in flight time. The only ones big enough to hold their biggest bombers are in either American or British soil. Which gives them some say with Trump. >Putin's gas taps and whether a ceasefire in the Gulf holds for another week That's a brutal position for any PM to be in The uk has long made its choice in Russia. They are perfectly content backing Ukraine. >The Lebanon criticism is notable though Starmer publicly calling Israeli strikes "wrong" during an active ceasefire is a harder line than most NATO leaders will touch Seems like the uk, france and Germany all agreed a position on this one.
56
LeNordique 1 day ago +11
What's keeping the UK from investing heavily in nuclear power?
11
winmace 1 day ago +23
Nothing, we already do, and SMRs are a big area of investment at the moment as an alternative to the big nuclear plants of the past. Faster to build, modular so can be expanded as needed and utilises expertise we already have in building the same reactors for nuclear subs. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/advanced-nuclear-technologies/advanced-nuclear-technologies
23
RedofPaw 1 day ago +6
Hinkley point is over budget and over schedule. Meanwhile wind turbine are going up in the north sea and even with limited sun compared to other places solar is also growing.
6
gmc98765 1 day ago +11
Nuclear costs twice as much as any other form of power. It would be cheaper to install enough renewable capacity to meet 5× the average demand plus enough gas generation to cover the remaining few percent when that isn't enough. Also, it suffers from the same issue as renewables: you can't control the output to match demand. Well, you can but it doesn't actually save you any money; the cost of nuclear power is dominated by the capital cost, so you pay (heavily) for capacity whether you use it or not.
11
OllyDee 1 day ago +207
Yeah well, aren’t we all mate.
207
soapinthepeehole 1 day ago +8
A majority of Americans are also fed up with Trump and Putin on this and so many other things. So tired of the world being run by sociopaths and outright psychopaths.
8
YesterdayIcy1963 1 day ago +32
There was that guy from Canada who made that speech at Davos about middle powers banding together. Canada has one of the largest oil reserves on the planet. Why not talk to that guy.
32
Everestkid 1 day ago +12
We have oil reserves but no way to get them to the European market. If you wanna fund an oil pipeline across Canada to supply Europe, be my guest. It's not like it's been tried for almost 50 years with nonstop controversy or anything.
12
YesterdayIcy1963 1 day ago +6
Newfoundland a rather large oil reserve. Why does everyone only think that Alberta has oil?
6
Everestkid 1 day ago +7
Because Newfoundland's oil production is a fraction of that of Alberta's.
7
wellyboi 1 day ago +118
Western leaders finally saying something remotely negative about Trump now that enough public sentiment has turned against him and other leaders are taking a stand.
118
littlebossman 1 day ago +90
Every time Starmer speaks out about Donald, his poll ratings climb. Mark Carney won the Canadian election on largely the same platform. Donald Trump is the most-hated man on the planet. Tying yourself to him is a mistake politically - because Donald goes back on any deal he ever makes - and personally, because voters hate Donald and anyone associated with him. It's about time politicians started doing what their citizens overwhelmingly want... which is putting Donald C*** in his place. At this point in time there is *zero* benefit to treating the US as anything other than a rogue state.
90
washag 1 day ago +25
Previously they maintained a diplomatic silence because the US economy is large and deeply intertwined enough with most global economies (with the exception of the individual nations in the EU) that it can be weaponised against Trump's critics. The best thing the leaders could do for their country was avoid making themselves targets. No matter what anyone says, the power to stop Trump's idiocy is not something other countries have. The US could stop him, but outsiders can't compel them to. That all changed with Iran. The threat of the US damaging their economy on purpose is diminished when the US has already severely damaged the global economy through sheer idiocy, without meaning to. Higher oil prices function the same as the tariffs Trump was threatening them with - they make international trade more expensive. The moron has been figuratively pointing a gun at world leaders to muzzle them, then set off a bomb that pelted them all with shrapnel anyway. That loosened the muzzles.
25
Gentle_Snail 1 day ago +6
If you point out how Starmer has acted in response to Trump his pole numbers instantly surge 26%.
6
metallicadefender 1 day ago +86
All the more reason to go green or nuclear.
86
Jay-Seekay 1 day ago +33
I hope you mean for energy…
33
metallicadefender 1 day ago +16
Yes. No pun intended.
16
TemujinRi 1 day ago +101
Publicly state that if he is going to keep threatening allies the UK is going to have to consider his families businesses as enemy property and bar them from doing business in the UK.
101
Hirork 1 day ago +120
Seize his golf course and turn it into a public green space. Invite Rosie O'Donnel over from Ireland for the opening ceremony. Name it the Obama Public Park.
120
DarkStanley 1 day ago +62
Fill it full of wind turbines
62
Hirork 1 day ago +12
That was my second option but only if it doesn't impede on the people who live nearby. They suffered enough when he was constructing the thing.
12
saidtheWhale2000 1 day ago +8
ngl just turn it into a wind and solar panel farm would be so funny, just to f*** with him
8
TemujinRi 1 day ago +12
I genuinely think the rage of this would cause a stroke.
12
hackingdreams 1 day ago +7
You couldn't tell the difference from how he is now.
7
Agile_Resolution_822 1 day ago +125
WOW that might be the first time he used a bad word
125
KingBlackToof 1 day ago +58
The f\* word!!!! "fed"
58
-kahmi- 1 day ago +9
or maybe the u word
9
Scioptic- 1 day ago +45
Aren't we all, Starmer; aren't we all.
45
Fenris_uy 1 day ago +48
Deploy more renewables, deploy more batteries, electrify freight trains.
48
Informal_Drawing 1 day ago +25
Electrify *all the things*.
25
ReeceAUS 1 day ago +17
Sounds like he’s saying “we shouldn’t be dependent on energy from the rest of the world”. I think most people/countries are saying that now… but what are you going todo about it?
17
RollingSparks 1 day ago +46
Should've went balls deep on nuclear in 1991.
46
winmace 1 day ago +3
The second best time to do it is now, which we are doing; https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/advanced-nuclear-technologies/advanced-nuclear-technologies
3
AndromedaFire 1 day ago +4
I think there’s still space for new nuclear but I think they need to freeze non critical regulations for a project at inception. It takes say 5 years to build the plant. So year -3 they design it, year -1 they fund it, year 0 they break ground and then bring in or change the rules and they do that every year making constant design changes and set backs until year 10 when people complain why it’s not built yet and is double the funded budget.
4
ottermanuk 1 day ago +8
To be fair that's literally any infrastructure project in the UK, and ESPECIALLY and infrastructure project longer than one election cycle. We've been coasting on shit infrastructure since 08
8
jourdan442 1 day ago +6
The window of nuclear being the best and most economical option would’ve eventually closed in favour of renewables either way. It would’ve been a lot of investment (and long term waste management) for what would’ve amounted to a blip in the greater timeline of energy production. I’m as anti-anti-nuclear as they come but it’s getting harder and harder to believe it would’ve had a better outcome than going balls deep on renewables.
6
SuperTropicalDesert 1 day ago +3
I still hope we get some progress on SMRs thoigh
3
coomzee 1 day ago +15
Just strike a deal with Norway. No one says you have to buy oil and gas using the world's index prices.
15
DexJedi 1 day ago +15
That sounds great. But is that not something everyone will try then? Which... drives up the price? These kind of tricks only work if nobody knows about Norway. And why would Norway sell it at a lower rate then the world prices to the UK?
15
whatsgoingon350 1 day ago +3
If that was possible why would America give a shit about world prices they produce more than enough.
3
kmdsid 1 day ago +11
We f****** hate Trump.
11
Cabbages24ADollar 1 day ago +16
When Joe Biden is a MUCH better president you’re cooked. Remove the cranky old demented narcissist pedo. He’s done. MAGA failed.
16
zissouo 1 day ago +9
Anyone thinking Biden was a bad president has been wading too deep in MAGA propaganda.
9
takeda64 1 day ago +12
> When Joe Biden is a MUCH better president you’re cooked. Sorry, but you're falling for the misinformation from the conservatives. In what way was he actually bad? Yes, he is old, and has speech impediment from childhood (and because of the age it was harder for him to control it), but he got a really good team in his cabinet, and he actually was much more progressive than his predecessors (IMO the media jumped on him not because of the debate but because he promised to heavily tax income above $1M, you can see that Harris used his platform, but that specific thing was removed) He also passed quite groundbreaking bills. Unfortunately trump illegally killed them. Illegally, because Republicans knew it would be unpopular to do it through legislation, so trump blocked money through the DOGE c*** effectively killing them. I think Biden was actually much better than Obama in terms of effectiveness, of course Obama is much better speaker and of course younger. Edit: https://www.npr.org/2024/02/19/1232447088/historians-presidents-survey-trump-last-biden-14th
12
Informal_Drawing 1 day ago +12
It's almost as if going out of our way to appease these world-class fuckwits isn't in our best interests. Nice that he finally got the god damned memo.
12
Sweet-Competition-15 1 day ago +3
Well, guess what...I'm not exactly tickled pink about it either!
3
TheOpeningAct2 1 day ago +3
We all are fed up
3
wjames0394 1 day ago +3
Buy CDN.
3
Intelligent_Kick_436 1 day ago +3
As the saying goes, never let a good crisis go to waste! Now is the time for sane and reasonable nations to lock in strong win-win cooperative pacts regarding resources, energy, land, and human capital. Along with that, have strong terms that punt defective countries, like Hungary/Orban. And arm yourselves to the teeth and starve out the US and Russia: if they've gone rogue let them flounder in insanity.
3
xCueMe 1 day ago +3
Oh NOWWWW you’re fed up!
3
Quoramilu 1 day ago +3
Join the club mate everyones bills are through the roof
3
NeoIsJohnWick 1 day ago +3
Everyone is tbh.
3
Old_Badger311 1 day ago +3
Tell you king not to come here. Trump doesn’t deserve the honor of a royal visit
3
m__s 1 day ago +1
You are not the only one. We are all tired with Trump.
1
Worth_Cobbler_4140 1 day ago +49
Maybe he should ya know do something about it?
49
LDNVoice 1 day ago +37
Not saying they are doing a perfect job but they are doing a fair bit about it. The reality is things don't just happen with a click of the fingers and people don't care because it doesn't make headlines.
37
Hirork 1 day ago +19
Exactly, they are doing things in the background right now. Our energy bills literally dropped this month. We have until July before the next price change and realistically until October before energy use becomes a concern for winter. They are planning a package of measures to see people through the next winter if energy prices remain stubborn. But we won't know what they will be until closer to the time. Because they'll be planning for the worst and hoping for the best. They've lifted a ban on plug-in solar so that people can get c**** solar panels that can go on balconies, etc. It's like people are looking for excuses to hate on this government sometimes. It's like guys, compared to the last 3 prime ministers which would you rather? Yes everything is still broken, because those lot broke it. Rebuilding takes time.
19
LDNVoice 1 day ago +9
It's actually sad. The government has also done things that are genuinely bad (Mostly regarding internet, monitoring and safety online) but compared to what this it was 100x worse. I find it quite sad how much criticism these guys are getting compared to previous administrations. They aren't perfect but they are putting us on the right track. Finally getting some improvements in the UK than the constant degradation of our country
9
CautiousBiscuit 1 day ago +24
What would you suggest?
24
Cube00 1 day ago +40
Woah slow down there Nigel Mansell.
40
Jabjab345 1 day ago +11
What powers does he possess that can actually do anything?
11
RealAmbassador4081 1 day ago +7
We are all fed up with this Bullshit. Americans need to take back their country from these maniacs.
7
YourOverlords 1 day ago +5
buy canadian mr.starmer
5
munchinerara 1 day ago +11
Do something about it then.
11
HumanBeing7396 1 day ago +19
Stirring stuff - reminds me of Churchill’s famous “I’m slightly annoyed” speech.
19
[deleted] 1 day ago +8
[deleted]
8
Jbroy 1 day ago +7
He should add Netenyahu as well to the mix!
7
OttoKrieg 1 day ago +4
join the club dude
4
Redmistburns 1 day ago +2
World leaders hate it when you do this one trick
2
timesuck47 1 day ago +2
So are they converting to 100% renewable energy?
2
so_dope24 1 day ago +2
Same
2
Odd_Photograph_7591 1 day ago +2
Then he may want to accelerate/increase the UK's renewable energy goals
2
kurashima 1 day ago +2
Should have done something about it instead of Pandering to Mango Mussolini whilst he was manoeuvring around you
2
Baskreiger 1 day ago +2
Make lobbyism illegal and real project will be allowed to be on the table.
2
irishsausage 1 day ago +2
Decouple the energy prices from oil and gas then you cowards
2
LogAware 1 day ago +2
Cool. Do something about it
2
Treehousefairyqueen 1 day ago +2
Particularly when they profit from it!
2
CriticalJump 1 day ago +2
If only Giorgia Meloni had even an inch of the spine that Starmer and other Western European leaders had...
2
Dont_Kick_Stuff 1 day ago +2
Please Keir Starmer do something... anything at all because it just might end this madness. I say this as an American who is oh so tired of this shit because I voted against the Cuntmander in Chief here.
2
Waste_Jello9947 1 day ago +2
Me too Starmer... me too 
2
duxwontobey 1 day ago +2
100% energy independence would mean we can sell excess to other countries too. It's literally a win win with an upfront cost.
2
SAAPenguin 1 day ago +2
[ Removed by Listnook ]
2
kcbluedog 1 day ago +2
Sounds like jam on a biscuit, Keir.
2
Few_Scientist5381 1 day ago +2
Best he puts energy prices up now then, save him doing a uturn in two weeks. 
2
cantbelieveshesaid1 1 day ago +2
Renationalise it all then. Right now. Emergency time.
2
OpinionDude5000 1 day ago +2
As an American, Im fed up with Trump affecting energy costs too.
2
drive2rigel 1 day ago +1
The first honest comment from British PM.
1
n8udd 1 day ago +1
And yet they still don't offer decent schemes for installing solar panels!!
1
← Back to Board