· 118 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 8, 2026 at 10:21 AM

KLM flight attendant tests negative for Hanta virus

Posted by ErrorReplaceUser


KLM flight attendant tests negative for hantavirus; 5 others had close contact with woman
NL Times
KLM flight attendant tests negative for hantavirus; 5 others had close contact with woman
The KLM flight attendant who developed symptoms after having contact with a 69-year-old Dutch woman who died from a hantavirus infection, has tested negative for the virus, RTL Nieuws reported on Friday morning. Municipal health service GGD Kennemerland has identified 60 people who had contact with the Dutch woman, including five who had “intensive contact with her,” RTL Nieuws reports.

🚩 Report this post

118 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Timoleiro 5 days ago +636
Sell all your toilet paper!
636
fakeclown 5 days ago +109
Some toilet paper market manipulation news
109
ComradeGibbon 5 days ago +28
This is all a scam by big TP.
28
King_Fisher99 4 days ago +2
The industrial tp complex?
2
uraniumless 5 days ago +17
> 5 others had close contact with woman Not quite yet.
17
ux3l 5 days ago +14
Are they quarantined? Then this outbreak is probably contained. Edit: >They will be actively monitored. Experts are currently consulting on which measures are appropriate,” Nothing to worry, I'd say.
14
FrismFrasm 5 days ago +4
In b4 they hop on 5 planes to 5 different continents
4
ux3l 5 days ago +1
But with someone following them around, lol
1
-TheDream 4 days ago +1
And she could also still be in the incubation period and still test negative later.
1
Couscousfan07 5 days ago +22
Agreed. Amidst all this “news”, the two things missing are scientifically confirmed examples of human to human transmission, and a confirmation that the cruise ship itself wasn’t ingest with rats to begin with. The cruise line has been oddly quiet in all this, but jeez why did we jump to human to human so quickly ? Rats get on ships and in close quarters, the virus can get to humans very easily.
22
telllmelies 5 days ago +25
Oceanwide Expeditions has put out continuous updates on their Facebook page
25
bangonthedrums 5 days ago +15
Also literally all the guests onboard were in Argentina before the cruise started, and the virus can incubate up to 8 weeks. There’s no confirmation they didn’t all catch it prior to embarking either
15
ozymandingus578 5 days ago +10
The source of the outbreak was almost certainly a couple of bird watchers who decided to take an excursion to an Argentinian land fill. That’s ground zero. The couple was clearly the source of the outbreak. They brought it on to the ship. In the future, tourists who want to visit dumps should follow strict sanitary guidelines to prevent this from reoccurring.
10
LikesToLurkNYC 4 days ago +3
I can’t imagine signing up for an excursion involving a landfill - birds be damned
3
Nathan-Stubblefield 5 days ago +5
->infested
5
TurnkeyLurker 4 days ago +2
\> that the cruise ship itself wasn’t **ingest with rats** to begin with. \*infested with rats ?
2
sweet_pickles12 4 days ago +2
I’ve been wondering about that too- rodents on the ship.
2
InboxMeYourSpacePics 4 days ago +1
People keep claiming they searched the ship but I haven’t seen confirmed reports of that
1
Rescuepets777 4 days ago +2
The WHO believes that the Patient 0 passenger contracted it in Argentina where the strain of virus he had exists. This strain already is known to be transmissible from human to human when they have close contact. It reportedly is not transmitted casually through aerosolized drops from breathing/sneezing.
2
Couscousfan07 4 days ago +2
It is not known. No peer reviewed studies. They hypothesize that it may have been, but no proof yet. But all the media articles are posting it as gospel so now even the various AI chat bots believe it’s true. The 1993 series of deaths I posted a link to in here , it had the same suspicion. But deeper study revealed that all the victims lived or were spending time in a house that was infested with mice. Droppings and urine all over, and that’s what was causing the infection.
2
Rescuepets777 4 days ago +1
That's interesting. I hadn't seen that. Thanks for the information
1
Hullfella 5 days ago +4
Damn! I just started isolating! Now I'm going to have to socialise again
4
FrismFrasm 5 days ago +1
Toilet paper stocks are IN THE SHITTER this morning!
1
matt-travels-eu 3 days ago +1
Sell or buy? Did the oanic start or not yet? Meh
1
uraniumless 5 days ago +462
That must've been a super stressful time for her. Glad she's good.
462
nr1988 5 days ago +78
Super stressful for all of us!
78
Heizard 5 days ago +290
Knowing Dutch doctors, probably took one glance and told: "It's nothing, here is paracetamol"
290
Hakushakuu 5 days ago +45
Ah yes, just like my army medical officers.
45
_yetifeet 5 days ago +11
After telling you to change your socks and drink water
11
Rentta 4 days ago +2
Same in Finnish army at least when i was there. I would get sealed envelope from medics of some mystery pills that did jack shit for any pain whatsoever. I did learn to bring bit of ibuprofen from holidays after that.
2
Beru73 5 days ago +84
Still better than the American doctors: "It's nothing, here is paracetamol, that will be $2,322"
84
JustSatisfactory 5 days ago +86
That's really not true. American doctors would never call it paracetamol.
86
pork_fried_christ 5 days ago +23
Or know prices off the tops of their head. 
23
UrOpinionIsBadBuddy 5 days ago +5
At that point ur better off walking into Walmart to buy tylenol
5
Aurora_Fatalis 5 days ago +11
It's the same substance. Tylenol is the brand name of a drug which is called acetaminophen in the US and Japan and paracetamol everywhere else. Because American medicine wasn't complicated enough I guess.
11
cjsv7657 5 days ago +21
N-acetyl-p-aminophenol N-acetyl-para-aminophenol tylenol - N-ace**tyl**-para-aminoph**enol** acetaminophen - N-**acet**yl-para-**aminophen**ol paracetamol - N-a**cet**yl-**para**-**am**inophen**ol** with some reorganizing The US and Japanese names make more sense for once
21
i_sell_you_lies 4 days ago +1
Huh! Til!
1
LFC908 4 days ago
Then the drug for paracetamol overdose is called N-acetylcysteine.
0
bangonthedrums 5 days ago +7
It’s acetaminophen in Canada too
7
InboxMeYourSpacePics 4 days ago +1
As an American doctor we do our best to find good prices for prescriptions for the patient - we will print out goodRx coupons for you that we find ourselves if that helps. But we can’t be blamed for the insurance companies
1
sgthombre 5 days ago +1
Literally got charged $300 for a nurse to tell me "put some ice on it", didn't even get to talk to a doctor!
1
Raneynickel4 5 days ago -1
Fake. Everyone knows american doctors give you antibiotics for everything
-1
ReeferTurtle 5 days ago +5
It’s not Korea
5
MechKeyboardScrub 4 days ago +1
I miss when they passed out percs instead.
1
matthieuC 5 days ago +4
Hold your horse there. Paracetamol? They're still breathing. it will be: rest and hydrate
4
arveena 4 days ago +1
What are you gonna do against a virus. Most viruses dont have any drug that can kill them at all. Its your immunesystem that kills it in the end. With a few very important exceptions like HIV we cant do anything against viruses. So painkiller and rest ist the only thing a doctor can do
1
withoutatt 5 days ago -4
Ugh. Flashbacks to borderline sepsis.
-4
CollegeFootballGood 4 days ago -1
Lmaooo I got a box of that after landing in Norway. Best headache medicine ever. Felt like a new man after that super Tylenol
-1
Tobias---Funke 5 days ago +46
Yay.
46
michaelmcmikey 5 days ago +145
Considering what we know of how hantavirus spreads between humans (with difficulty), this was the expected outcome. She was quarantined out of an abundance of caution, and that’s the smart thing to do, but people treated it like we knew for sure she had caught it, and that was never a high probability. Will this slow down the “here we go again” folks at all? Probably not.
145
Forretressqt 5 days ago +62
"Trust the science" amirite. It's a well-known and understood pathogen and experts reiterate "this isn't cause for panic and it's acting how we expect" but media will push whatever generates clicks and thus revenue. I very vividly remember the inverse during COVID how headlines dictated (late 2019) Wuhan had "Draconian lockdowns" and "Human rights concerns" because as a novel virus (contrast to this) they tried to stem transmission.
62
BGFlyingToaster 4 days ago +2
Yes, trust the science. We lay people aren't going to do any better by guessing. While I agree with your main point, I just wanted to clarify that this isn't exactly a "well-known and understood pathogen". It is known, yes, and is certainly not a novel virus like COVID-19 was, but there have only been 3,000 documented human cases of this particular strain of hantavirus (Andes strain) and only 300 known instances of human to human spread. In a global medical sense, that's still a tiny dataset. But at least there have been a few studies to accompany the real-world outbreak data.
2
AuroraFinem 5 days ago -11
Just yesterday they increase the infections period for contact tracing from 1-2 days around your first fever to 7 days, 2 days prior to first symptoms and 5 days after. Viruses mutate all the time. Obviously we’re a long ways off from legitimate pandemic concerns but assuming we know everything about this virus is the same reason Covid turned into a pandemic to begin with.
-11
Zalnan 5 days ago +10
This virus has been around in the Andes for a long time, the same strain. The virus itself is more stable than sars based viruses (like covid), if it could easily mutate it would have done so in Argentina already.
10
BGFlyingToaster 4 days ago +1
I'll never trust that RNA viruses won't mutate, especially those that are introduced to a new species (us). There have only been 3,000 documented cases of the Andes strain of hantavirus in humans, and only 300 cases where it was documented spreading from human to human. That's still a tiny data set in a global medical context, so here's hoping that it plays nice and stays primarily with the Argentinian mice.
1
SpuckMcDuck 5 days ago -7
So just to be clear, you *don't* think it's reasonable to say that literally welding people into their homes is draconian and problematic? That's not mutually exclusive with covid being a really serious issue and really doesn't even imply that it isn't, so it's kind of weird you picked that as your example of media downplaying covid.
-7
rafffen 5 days ago -13
That's true, but everytime someone is infected there is a chance of it mutating
-13
fightmaxmaster 5 days ago +16
But "mutating" generally means minimal changes, not suddenly leaping to widespread human transmission. You might as well panic that cold viruses might suddenly mutate to become fatal - I mean maybe, but realistically not gonna happen so it's not worth stressing about.
16
Little_Noodles 5 days ago +11
There’s dozens of uncommon but unpleasant diseases out there that, like hantavirus, are endemic to various regions. And it’s not that unusual for someone traveling to contract them. You could say that about any one of these diseases. But it’s pretty rare for any of them to actually mutate in a way that moves it from endemic to pandemic. And it doesn’t look like it has here.
11
Muroid 5 days ago +2
That’s true for every single virus at all times. This one isn’t any more likely to suddenly mutate in a dangerous way than anything else just because it happens to be in the news at the moment.
2
genreprank 5 days ago +17
Well, this kind of scare happens all the time. Remember Ebola and Zika? But after covid of course people are a little twitchy
17
ntsp00 4 days ago +12
> But after covid of course people are a little twitchy Ngl that might be the understatement of the year, I've read comments saying the ship should be sunk or sent to a deserted island with supplies airdropped. And so many people that are apparently unable to follow a timeline think WHO released dozens of passengers into the world instead of quarantining them. When in actuality the passengers disembarked at their predestined port as scheduled because it was a full week before WHO ever got involved.
12
ChemicalNo2878 5 days ago +13
The 2018 outbreak of the Andes Virus supports arguments that a pandemic is very unlikely to occur as the window for transmission is Day 1 (same day a person starts to display symptoms) But prior clickbait news titles makes it sounds like this virus is extremely contagious. The risk of transmission is just extremely low even as a person displays symptoms. Now one day 1 the risk if transmission is very high according to the 2018 outbreak as the index patient (who started displaying symptoms) went to a party and infected 6 people, 1 person got infected as he passed the index after a small greeting leaving the restroom) but after day 1 the risk falls dramatically, unlike covid which can keep the risk of transmission high for a week and spread asymptomatically (This andes strain has no evidence of spreading such way) Edit: the window for *highest* transmission is Day 1 Another Edit: It does have a chance of spreading asymptomatically but it’s very unlikely* but some reports say the day before and the day symptoms start is the window.
13
fightmaxmaster 5 days ago +17
But don't you understand?! Because Covid happened once that means literally every infectious disease outbreak is basically guaranteed to be a global pandemic! Never mind the many many many other infectious disease outbreaks including this specific virus that haven't wrecked the world, but who has time for facts or basic research when fearmongering and self-inflicted anxiety is apparently preferable to so many listnookors.
17
ChemicalNo2878 5 days ago +12
100% I was honestly starting to get scared but then I remembered the fear monkey-pox and nipah caused online. So I did a quick search and found an article on the same strain that caused the 2018 outbreak. A lot of people are recommending great books to read, It has peaked my interested so I’m starting to read a book on the Hendra Virus called Spillover.
12
fightmaxmaster 5 days ago +11
So many people seem to have an inability for any nuance. Something's good or bad, will kill us all or be totally harmless, etc. Like if a weather forecast says an 80% chance of rain, and it doesn't rain, people say it was wrong. Nope, that's what the 20% is for! This is **a** risk, but really really limited. Infectious disease outbreaks happen all the time, and they basically never go global. Doesn't mean they're not impactful. I listened to an old podcast episode recently from 2014 when there was an ebola outbreak. That was very serious *in the affected countries*, but the US media was still breathlessly talking about it, as if it would wipe out half the country. One person died in the US, but gallons of metaphorical ink was spilled over it, because people lap up fear without even applying basic common sense. It's exhausting. And if you dare to point out that maybe their anxiety is *slightly* disproportionate, some people will get really angry/defensive over it, like they secretly want to be stressed and feel at risk. People are weird.
11
S99B88 5 days ago +3
News stories emphasized the worst by saying she was hospitalized I think. When in reality hospitalization was likely out of an abundance of caution, both in case she got very ill very quickly they could help her sooner, plus contain exposure to others in the event it turned out to be hantavirus. Otherwise, a person well enough to be working as a flight attendant suddenly being hospitalized would cause people even subconsciously to think she deteriorated very quickly.
3
ntsp00 4 days ago +1
Emphasized how? The articles I read literally stated in the first paragraph she was hospitalized out of caution and currently being tested. Just because listnook is full of idiots that only read titles doesn't mean the news was sensationalized. Just like how so many people were freaking out in the comments of the article that got posted with the headline saying it's nothing like covid or influenza. Which they would have known is a *good* thing had they actually bothered to read the article. I'm still amazed so many of these people survived covid.
1
S99B88 4 days ago +1
Extended articles may have said that. Some people can’t get past paywalls. There are in fact news articles that falsely claim she had hantavirus: https://simpleflying.com/flight-attendant-hospitalized-hantavirus-infected-woman-dies/ As for other articles, saying the person is being tested isn’t reassuring, because generally testing is the step that happens BEFORE the results come back positive or negative. Saying the person was in isolation and/or experiencing mild symptoms in and of itself also isn’t reassuring because symptoms tend to worsen, and isolation is done when there’s a possibility the person has it, not when they’re certain the person doesn’t have it. Moreover, there were plenty of articles that did NOT state it was just a precaution. Here are a few examples: https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/klm-flight-attendant-hospitalized-hantavirus-exposure https://nypost.com/2026/05/07/world-news/klm-flight-attendant-hospitalized-after-coming-in-contact-hantavirus-cruise-ship-passenger-who-died/ There’s one that said the flight attendant was being hospitalized after showing mild symptoms, then went on to say that people on the flight were being contacted as a precaution, which might lead people to concede that the flight attendant’s situation was more than a precaution: https://www.ndtv.com/health/klm-flight-attendant-tested-for-hantavirus-says-dutch-health-ministry-11461823
1
NickSeider 5 days ago +1
Considering our entire planet endured a pandemic that occurred less than 7 years ago, I can completely understand why many people became concerned about something like this - me included. It is a concerning cluster, and we all learned as a planet how quickly things can change day-to-day with this stuff. There is a difference between being a doomer and being someone who has more knowledge than before on how chaotic situations can get. Sure, the flight attendant was unlikely to be positive, but with all the context of a highly symptomatic infected person traveled on 1 flight, walked through an international airport, and boarded another flight, to be escorted off and collapse in the airport… and die the next day… I think it’s been fair to be reasonably concerned until the data came back. Being a doomer doesn’t help. But also pretending everything is going to be okay isn’t helpful either when we all just went through a recent historical experience that clearly tells us things aren’t okay when shit hits the fan. Thankfully, the data came back. The flight attendant doesn’t have Hantavirus. The ship itself has been managed relatively well by both its crew and the visiting medical staff. The tracing is well under way. Now those concerned should be able to air a sigh of relief, and we should be grateful this is going fairly smoothly considering the times we live. Will this comment slow down people who like to judge others in general for having entirely human reactions to world events? Probably not.
1
S99B88 5 days ago +1
Personally I think this one may even be a bit more like SARS, where greatest risk of exposure was people in their homes and the healthcare workers. But with lessons learned from SARS, healthcare facilities tend to be much better at infection control.
1
Parking_Back3339 3 days ago +1
This is a very sane response. People are either burying thier heads in the sand and mocking everyone for 'pancking' and making crass jokes about toilet paper or claiming its COVID2.0. Honestly, it is concerning and I feel bad for everyone exposed , but they need to be informed of possible exposure so they can seek medical intervention if needed--which seems to be effective. Things should be contained to prevent mutation and further spread. Better safe than sorry.
1
gokarrt 5 days ago +1
this is the expected, but still reassuring, news. some people were primed for it to go the other way, for sure.
1
Ok-Swim2827 4 days ago +1
She was quarantined because she was symptomatic. Until more time passes, it could be a false negative. A sick man who was originally being treated in South Africa tested negative on April 24th, but remained under observation, testing positive on May 2nd. That’s a 10 day window from symptom onset to positive test results. Britain, Spain, and Singapore all have secondary symptomatic contact cases under the same observation. With one Canadian and two New Jersey residents pending secondary contact outcomes as well. It does seem that the virus needs to be highly active in the body before a positive test comes back, which isn’t too far off from how Covid testing originally worked. Edit: I think the shittiest part about this whole thing is the time. It will be days or weeks without new cases popping up. News will die off. Every time there’s a new case, it’ll be this all over again. Once we start seeing positive secondary cases from air travel, especially in a city, it’s likely a done deal.
1
YesGuyIncognito 5 days ago -11
I remember all the people who had this exact attitude to dismiss the COVID pandemic.
-11
jimalloneword 5 days ago +22
I mean that's because like 99% they are right. We've had hundreds of potential pandemic outbreaks over the years and only one pandemic. It's like predicting stock market crashes. Sure, some people predict the real ones, but most people predict dozens that never happened.
22
Genkiotoko 5 days ago +6
I swear, there's such a significant percentage of listnook that says comments like this one. It's almost like they want the hantavirus to be more than it is. It's probably because it's the first time they've heard of the virus and they assume it's something new rather thana virus that's thousands of years old. They're unable to distinguish the difference between new to them and new to the world. What results is just uneducated fear mongering.
6
bristow84 5 days ago +5
Oh you better believe there’s people on Listnook who want it to be more than it is. They want the return of lockdowns and draconian measures, I saw more than one comment on an article about this yesterday, on this very sublistnook, from people who wished for lockdowns again because “that’s where they thrived”. It’s honestly disgusting behaviour.
5
[deleted] 5 days ago -4
[removed]
-4
fightmaxmaster 5 days ago +3
No that's not the worst thing. The worst thing about treating **every** infectious disease outbreak like it'll be a global pandemic is that people get dumber, stop caring, start minimising the actual serious cases, dismiss widespread knowledge as "you never know". Don't call someone a dumbass just because a **known virus** isn't a pandemic. You enjoy your bunker and jumping at shadows. To be extra clear, I'm not saying "dismiss everything, always", but we have knowledge and information about this virus, this outbreak, and acting like we don't is ridiculous. You might wear a seatbelt, but having this *attitude* towards any infectious disease is like driving everywhere at 2mph because you're terrified of a car crash. Live your life how you want, but don't be a pain in the ass for the rest of us who have better risk analysis.
3
Genkiotoko 5 days ago +2
Wow, unwarranted name-calling, you must think you're pretty badass. There is a significant difference between the last pandemic and a containedoutbreak on a single cruise ship. You should really do better to learn the difference. Nobody is downplaying this. The people who were on the ship are being tracked for the most part, and those who showed symptoms were checked out. The flight attendant tested negative after a period of quarantine. The worse thing that can happen is not grabbing extra toilet paper. The pandemic caused a lot of trauma for a lot of people. One essentially re-lives that trauma when they live their life in fear of pandemics every time they see an even somewhat notable headline. Listnook is creating a zeitgeist out of dark humorjokes and uneducated fear. That zeitgeist has real life repercussions beyond toilet paper.
2
palcatraz 5 days ago +1
No. The worst that can happen if big health institutions fearmonger is that they lose long term credibility.  If they fearmonger now and it turns into a nothingburger then too many people are just going to think they are wrong about everything. And then when the next potential pandemic happens, they will ignore their advice, even if the situation is completely different. 
1
spyglass352 5 days ago -2
those people are f****** stupid and are going to be stupid regardless. that ship has sailed (and there are infected people on it).
-2
fightmaxmaster 5 days ago +4
And all the people who dismissed the many, many many other infectious disease outbreaks that don't become global pandemics either. This is such a weird take.
4
elbenji 5 days ago +4
Just be because you hit the c***** once, won't mean you hit it again.
4
JarvisModeOn 5 days ago +12
Good that the symptomatic contacts tested negative. Still makes sense to monitor the close contacts and nearby passengers
12
ChemicalNo2878 5 days ago +24
More people should know that this virus is most contagious when a person begins to show symptoms. It’s unlikely for a virus of this caliber to start a pandemic because it doesn’t spread easily* when the host is asymptomatic. Unlike covid who had a huge chunk of people having no symptoms but spreading the virus. It’s also unfortunate that the lethality is very high, preventing further spread. Now proper precautions should still be in place such as quarantine for those exposed to confirmed suspected cases. In the 2018 outbreak (Epuyén Argentina same Andes strain that’s on the ship) the index host of the outbreak went to a party and spread it to 6 or so people and 1 person he said hello to on the way to the restroom infecting them. It is reported that the window for it being most contagious was at the same time he developed the fever and went to the party. The index case left the party 90 minutes after feeling unwell. Overall only 34 cases occurred during that outbreak, and was contained thru Quarantine and monitoring. Tldr: Although the spouse went on a plane, it is likely that window for a high chance of transmission had already passed as the most contagious window for the virus is when symptoms start Day 1. Edit: It could spread asymptotically but very unlikely until the onset to symptoms begin*
24
rain5151 4 days ago +7
Also worth noting that the early symptoms are pretty much just generic “flu-like symptoms,” so somebody with a cold who happened to be near an infected person can trigger the alarm of “person comes down with symptoms consistent with hantavirus after exposure to patient.” It’s not like there’s a rare, distinctive hallmark symptom like bleeding out of your eyes that serves as a dead giveaway. Obviously, we need to quarantine and screen the hell out of anyone falling ill after being around these patients, but the odds generally favor it being an unrelated common illness.
7
reallyneat 5 days ago +25
Sad day for Listnook
25
hiddentootss 5 days ago +10
Phew
10
calstanfordboye 5 days ago +12
With incubation period of up to 8 weeks does this mean she is really clear?
12
Initial-Return8802 5 days ago +35
I assume they did a proper blood test, unlike a quick PCR
35
Broad_Mushroom_8033 4 days ago +2
God I love me a quick pcr
2
ChemicalNo2878 5 days ago +8
Compared to the 2018 outbreak, the virus was detected weeks prior to the onset of symptoms, but this test just clears that the infection she is battling isn’t from Andes.
8
Dramatic-Set8761 5 days ago +5
My question, too.
5
jupfold 5 days ago +4
Dang. No WFH. (Joking, chill)
4
Remote_Literature_23 5 days ago +2
Can someone ELI5 - I was wondering how long it'd take until we get her results yesterday as it'd been a couple hours, so I looked it up, and it said it takes a week to a month to get the proper test results. Did they just mega fast-track hers? I'm thinking that has to be it 
2
Duelist-21 5 days ago +3
I think there is more modern testing, as there is blood test now. This differs from the 2018 outbreak
3
Ok-Wolverine-3238 5 days ago +1
No more positive news?
1
TiredPuncture 5 days ago +3
Slow news day?
3
ArtichokeAware7342 5 days ago +1
Calls on $PG.
1
King_Fisher99 4 days ago +1
Is negative positive?
1
zendria7 5 days ago +1
Considering the long incubation period, if we test her, say 5 weeks down the line--will the results change? Is it scientifically possible ??
1
exhibitprogram 5 days ago +3
It shows up on blood test before symptom onset, i.e. antibody test.
3
sgthombre 5 days ago +2
I believe the head of the WHO said they would keep monitoring them and retest them down the line.
2
cubsgirl101 4 days ago +1
They did a blood test and currently the flight attendant is testing negative for any sign of the virus. Normally if you had contracted it but were asymptomatic you would still test positive on the blood test. Theoretically it could change but the likelihood I believe is low and the likelihood of this being a false negative is very very low.
1
cody4king 4 days ago +1
If this is what qualifies for a news headline, then I’m happy to announce that I also, do not have Hanta virus.
1
tms2x2 5 days ago
Junckerisms: When it becomes serious, you have to lie. * ["The real Jean-Claude Juncker"](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-28317790), BBC (July 15, 2014) ["Jean-Claude Juncker profile: 'When it becomes serious, you have to lie'"](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/10874230/Jean-Claude-Juncker-profile-When-it-becomes-serious-you-have-to-lie.html), Telegraph (November 12, 2014)
0
Flonkerton_Scranton 4 days ago
Meanwhile... In the Epstein files...
0
ddollarsign 3 days ago
Are the tests unreliable? Is that why a negative test is newsworthy?
0
[deleted] 5 days ago -4
[deleted]
-4
michaelmcmikey 5 days ago +5
Where was that ever reported?? No news I saw ever said that. Just that she was ill.
5
Rich_Housing971 5 days ago -4
Oh look, a nothingburger. Just like the rest of the "new virus spreading!" headlines in the last 5-6 years. The Listnookors concerned about this are jokes.
-4
LiteratureMindless71 5 days ago -15
Goddamnit. Are things really as it feels inside? Are we progressively getting told more and more frequently over the years that we shouldn't survive?
-15
[deleted] 5 days ago -14
[removed]
-14
sgthombre 5 days ago +2
what begins?
2
michaelmcmikey 5 days ago +3
The slow realization that hantavirus is simply not the type of illness that’s likely to cause a massive pandemic, one hopes.
3
Impossible_Guava6093 5 days ago -5
This is all BS, can't you see it??
-5
← Back to Board