· 123 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 31, 2026 at 4:24 PM

LaGuardia controller staffing may have violated procedures on night of collision, document shows

Posted by Sharkella


LaGuardia controller staffing may have violated procedures on night of collision, document shows
NBC News
LaGuardia controller staffing may have violated procedures on night of collision, document shows
If the controller involved in the Air Canada crash was performing both air and ground duties, that would be inconsistent ⁠with the LaGuardia tower’s standard operating procedures.

🚩 Report this post

123 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
supercyberlurker Mar 31, 2026 +3002
I've seen that pattern dozens of times in my career. Management cuts support, reduces headcounts, adds responsibilities to who remain. They keep doing that until the staff is barely able to operate, having to cut corners just to try and keep up. Something bad happens... Then management will always try to shift the blame to the worker, never to the harried work environment and subtle pressures to go faster and riskier to save a few $.
3002
lizardman49 Mar 31, 2026 +1019
Same thing in Healthcare too. Administration will cut staffing to illegal/dangerous nurse to patient ratios and when a fatal mistake happens from an overworked nurse they try and pin it on the nurse.
1019
No_Introduction_3542 Mar 31, 2026 +420
The business people don't have licenses to worry about.
420
lizardman49 Mar 31, 2026 +262
Which is insane. Like should the nurses mistake be investigated yes. But when you give someone too many patients and put them on a 16 hour shift you dont get to act surprised when the inevitable happens. And the fact that management is allowed to ever work in that business again after doing something so willfully negligent is madness.
262
No_Introduction_3542 Mar 31, 2026 +96
You just have to remember it is YOUR license and you have authority over your actions. However, the way things are nowadays, all that means if you have to quit and find something else to do.
96
lizardman49 Mar 31, 2026 +125
And it puts them in a moral dilemma. Do I abandon the patients and walk off to protect my license? Not to mention California is the only state with actual legally enforceable nursing ratios to my knowledge.
125
Far-Conflict-1172 Mar 31, 2026 +43
The unfortunate practice of being able to use office staff that have licenses toward the court of total "required" staff per patient ratio is a thing. Weather the office staff is even leaving their ac and you still have fifty anyway.Is a whole different story. I don't believe it's actually enforceable.
43
OlderThanMyParents Mar 31, 2026 +29
My wife is a nurse, and a big part of the reason she left this year is this. Apparent deliberate understaffing in her department, no attempt to make arrangements for a replacement for a 12 week maternity leave, no consideration that during the summer people tend to take vacations so maybe we should staff appropriately... If absolutely everyone was around, and no one was on vacation, sick leave, home with a sick kid, out on maternity leave... there was just about enough staff to handle a normal week, if nothing went south. Everyone in her group was part-time, so it's not as though they would have had to hire an additional 40-hour-per-week nurse to provide coverage, plenty of them are happy to work half-time or less, and they're married so they don't even need healthcare coverage. But staffing is a cost, and on one gets raises from keeping costs up.
29
No_Introduction_3542 Mar 31, 2026 +35
Yeah, everyone wanted healthcare to "run like a business" because of the costs. Businessmen are some of the most expensive and worthless fucks around and healthcare costs really skyrocketed once they got their greedy hands into healthcare.
35
Rafflesrpx Mar 31, 2026 +11
lol I’m glad you caught yourself. Yes we have agency. To quit. Well said.
11
No_Introduction_3542 Mar 31, 2026 +13
Yeah, nowadays that's about all you can do. It wasn't like this in the past. I hope all the Reagan fans are glad we have finally turned medicine into a business. The last two weeks of their lives will basically involve being tortured to sustain the revenue stream.
13
Saneless Mar 31, 2026 +2
Yes but until that accident, the profitability was amazing
2
LovesFrenchLove_More Mar 31, 2026 +11
And no license to be held responsible either. It feels like at the very least.
11
random20190826 Mar 31, 2026 +34
My sister is a nurse in Canada. We watch the news and noticed that expensive nurses are being laid off in many places and are replaced with much cheaper nurses because the government ran out of money. So, it's not just for-profit healthcare systems that do this. Fortunately, my sister is one of the c**** nurses and there is plenty of work available (such that she grosses six figures while earning a $32 hourly wage).
34
issm Apr 1, 2026 +19
Canada has the same plague of "fiscally responsible" "government must be efficient" smoothbrains that the US does. So does most of the world. The main difference is that most of the world built up stronger safety nets before that plague hit, so it's taking longer to cut them back.
19
random20190826 Apr 1, 2026 +5
The Republicans openly cut Medicaid using the Big Beautiful Bill with its work requirements for the poor and did not extend subsidies for so-called rich people whose income is above 400% of the federal poverty level. That kind of overt cut to government healthcare would be extremely unpopular if attempted in Canada and likely lead to a crushing defeat for the incumbent party in the next election (when we think of federal cuts to healthcare in Canada, we mean amending the Canada Health Act, the law that controls how the federal government spends on healthcare).
5
issm Apr 1, 2026 +5
The premier of Ontario keeps doing it and somehow keeps winning majorities.
5
Starfire013 Mar 31, 2026 +10
Unsurprisingly, they don’t ever seem to cut funding for administration. There is this unfortunate push for corporatisation of healthcare, where the top hospital administrators are recruited straight from the banking and finance sector without any prior experience in healthcare. And so they run things like any other business, focusing on profit at the expense of safety and level of care. The clinicians on the other hand are given inadequate resources and told to do more with less, and we end up working unpaid overtime so that patient care isn’t impacted.
10
PoliteFocaccia Mar 31, 2026 +12
Cf the Lucy Letby scandal in the UK. And the post office scandal in the UK.
12
cheekytikiroom Mar 31, 2026 +3
Because management consensus is that nurses are easily replaceable. I disagree. But that’s the strategy.
3
Kaiisim Apr 1, 2026 +4
YUP. And social care. "Oh you only need two staff at night" that's true - as long as it's an emergency and then 1 staff is dealing with an emergency alone and the other is trying to do two peoples job. They see fault tolerance as an inefficiency to get rid of to make more money. How often are there emergencies? But when they happen they're bad
4
FillFrontFloor Apr 1, 2026 +1
I didn't look it up but someone at work once told me a car company once created a dangerous card that had a critical failure that would get the driver's killed. He said the company calculated it made more money selling the car than the legal fees for getting the drivers killed so they kept selling the car. I think they calculated getting people killed and paying out the insurance or the legal fees is still cheaper than hiring and making sure things are safe.
1
Ok-disaster2022 Mar 31, 2026 +82
Air traffic controllers have stressful jobs. The failures are systemic and management resulting in burnout exhaustion and mistakes. 
82
OlderThanMyParents Mar 31, 2026 +31
And they've been short-staffed for decades. It takes years to train them properly, many are older and ready to retire, and the system is making zero effort to provide for that.
31
PurplePango Mar 31, 2026 +52
Any good root cause analysis will always end in a management systems factor. Even if a person just blatantly fucked up, training hiring procedures etc are still ultimately the root cause of why that event happened
52
Lutya Apr 1, 2026 +16
I run a business unit for a large conglomerate. They cut a lot of expenses this year and we have had four OSHA violations as a result. They don't seem to understand whatever they saved by the cuts incurred four times the amount in fees, not to mention the people that were actually injured that caused these violations.
16
uzlonewolf Apr 1, 2026 +6
Which is why they're working hard to gut OSHA and cripple their ability to issue fines.
6
sixft7in Mar 31, 2026 +6
Just like what happened at Chernobyl on that night in April 1986.
6
trogdorkiller Mar 31, 2026 +11
This is literally plantation overseer tactics. Push a worker to their breaking point, scale back the pressure to *just* under that limit, and then ride the wave until they can't go anymore.
11
Beyond_yesterday Mar 31, 2026 +3
It's called being pony expressed. They ride you till you drop then get a new pony. It is part of the do more with less mentality. Great for upper management sitting in their air-conditioned offices.
3
Troutrageously Mar 31, 2026 +1
Story as old as time
1
TheAskewOne Apr 1, 2026 +1
"Sorry guys, you’re going to have to do more with less, but I’m sure you’re all ready to be a team player and go above and beyond."
1
fivegenerations Apr 1, 2026 +1
I feel so sorry for the air traffic controllers. It’s not their fault.
1
The_Bitter_Bear Mar 31, 2026 +1
Considering the cuts that got made last year this really tracks. 
1
roygbpcub Mar 31, 2026 +1
The jack Welch playbook...
1
tubastein Mar 31, 2026
I refer to this concept as “Trickle-Down Blamenomics”
0
randombrain Mar 31, 2026 +568
The "not to be combined into one position before midnight" rule was a national requirement that was implemented as result of a 2018 incident in Vegas, and the rule was rescinded nationally in November 2024. Facility SOPs were supposed to be updated to remove the rule no later than January 2025. I don't have firsthand knowledge of whether or not LGA's SOP actually was updated.
568
supercyberlurker Mar 31, 2026 +448
How it works is: 1. They try to make 1 person do the work of 2. 2. That person can't, because they are 1 person. So things get unsafe. 3. An accident happens bad enough that others look at it. 4. They decide a second person is needed, to keep it safe. 5. Management hires a 2nd person to comply. 6. GOTO 1.
448
ViewExplorer Mar 31, 2026 +154
6. Management decides to fire 2nd person after a while due to budget cuts 7. GOTO 1
154
supercyberlurker Mar 31, 2026 +16
You ain't wrong.
16
PringlesDuckFace Mar 31, 2026 +11
I wonder how much it would actually affect costs. Let's say a ATC employee costs $365k/year between salary, benefits, training, whatever else. I feel like that's a high estimate but it's for easy math. According to a cursory search, LaGuardia serves about 1000 flights per day. So it costs $1 per flight to staff an ATC. I don't know how many passengers on each flight, because presumably some amount of those are cargo flights, etc... that has no passengers. But it seems reasonable to assume the extra cost would be something less than 1 dollar per passenger at most. I'd love to know if this is illogical or I'm overlooking something here, but that seems like a reasonable cost. Maybe the number of small airports skews the math to be more expensive than it looks when only considering large airports, or ATC costs more than I thought, or it's just not possible to source revenue that way.
11
accidentlife Apr 1, 2026 +5
Your forgetting two things: * We do not have the capacity to train and develop enough ATC. There would need to be significant overhauls to training to support this (more than just hire trainers). * To add 1 employee at all times requires between 4-8 people to support a 24/7 operation to account for time off work (breaks/lunch, off shift, pto, etc),
5
shoulda-known-better Mar 31, 2026 +6
8. All while telling public it's fine, and blaming the overworked controller for whatever bad thing did end up happening!! Because it's clearly them not no staff
6
decmcc Apr 1, 2026 +1
no, they fire the first worker, because they have better pay and benefits, and we're worse off than with 1 person from before because that 1 person had experience
1
Panaka Mar 31, 2026 +23
You forgot the part that a new procedure is developed to prevent an accident and the offending facility gets a waiver to avoid implementing said new procedure (LAX did this when they forgot about a plane waiting to take off and landed one on top of it).
23
Reasonable_Place_481 Mar 31, 2026 +29
So do you mean that there is no longer a rule they can’t be combined or that they can never be combined regardless of time of day?
29
randombrain Mar 31, 2026 +40
Not speaking to LGA's procedures specifically, but only in general terms: At all towers across the country (maybe with the exception of cargo hubs), Ground and Local are combined for several hours on the midnight shift. At the very least, you can expect them to be combined from 1am to 5am. If not more than that. The old rule was that they had to be worked separately until 1) midnight, or 2) 90 minutes after the midnight shift started (which is usually 10pm). Whichever is later. That rule was rescinded and now the positions CAN be combined right at 10pm, workload permitting. Unless the facility has a specific rule saying otherwise.
40
brainchili Mar 31, 2026 +12
LGA has a curfew at midnight, so they would never operate in this manner, but then the rule was rescinded and they may now? That's fucked. Most processes are built with blood, but when you get someone like Trump in there, you get no empathy.
12
randombrain Mar 31, 2026 +12
Apparently the LGA curfew is only during the summer (I didn't know that either), but the tower is open 24/7 and would operate like this summer and winter both. I don't know why the "90 minutes" rule was changed, but it was changed in 2024 during the Biden administration.
12
brainchili Mar 31, 2026 +4
Was it always like that? I haven't flown in there for over 8 years, but I vaguely remember a winter flight being diverted to Newark because we got in too late.
4
randombrain Mar 31, 2026 +2
No idea.
2
Phx_68 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Didn't this accident take place before midnight?
1
randombrain Apr 1, 2026 +3
Yes, that's my point. The old rule used to be that the positions couldn't be combined into one person working solo until midnight. If that was still the case, and if it was also true that this person was working solo, then that would be a violation. But that rule was rescinded at the national level over a year ago, so unless LGA still has the rule at the local level, it wouldn't be a violation.
3
Phx_68 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Gotcha, I misunderstood
1
NewsCards Mar 31, 2026 +290
> Air traffic controller staffing at LaGuardia ​airport on the night an Air Canada jet collided with a fire truck may have violated the facility’s procedures by combining roles before midnight ‎ > Staffing shortages, including at the supervisor level, are placing controllers into combined roles handling local air and ground traffic more often I wonder why there are staffing shortages, is it possible that the federal government run by Trump, which is entirely responsible for ATC budgets, is not keeping ATCs, among other critical government services that Americans depend on, properly funded?
290
DisastroImminente Mar 31, 2026 +72
I thought we would see some overhaul after the incident in DC with the blackhawk and commercial jet, but alas, the only change we got was more scrutiny over DEI.
72
pricklybushes Mar 31, 2026 +12
They actually did just change the rules. we can no longer use visual separation between helicopters crossing the arrival/departure path of aircraft.
12
ForsakenRacism Mar 31, 2026 +19
It takes so many years to train a new controller no changes that have been made in the last 2 years can really make it worse.
19
Denimcurtain Mar 31, 2026 +14
They can just reduce the workforce. Lotsa ways to make things worse.
14
ForsakenRacism Mar 31, 2026 -2
Well yah but they haven’t done that. They are still trying to hire more people. There’s so many people in training around the country
-2
Denimcurtain Mar 31, 2026 +17
They literally did reduce the required number in the last 2 years. Apparently both federally and, in this specific instance, against local protocol. The latter is what largely what the article is about. Why would you confidently claim otherwise? Did you read the article?
17
ForsakenRacism Mar 31, 2026 +6
I’m an air traffic controller. The other change was a knee jerk reaction to a different incident. Not saying this particular tower shouldn’t have had more people. But the general guidance change is different.
6
Denimcurtain Mar 31, 2026 +3
So, you were spreading misinformation about your own position or are you claiming the article is wrong? You just said there weren't reductions, but there were both federally and as a key part of the story here so you being an air traffic controller kinda makes this worse unless you clarify.
3
ForsakenRacism Mar 31, 2026
There was no staffing reductions is what I was trying to say. It’s just a question of scheduling the amount of controllers there are. If they do 3 on the mid instead of 2 that’s 1 less during the day when it’s busier.
0
Denimcurtain Mar 31, 2026 +7
You mean they kept the same amount, but reduced the amount needed to work at specific times. That's still a staffing reduction especially since reducing the number during a different part of the day isn't the same decision. It's specifically a staffing reduction during the time when we had this issue. If they reimplemented and reemphasized the rule as a result of this accident then you could say that it was a knee-jerk reaction to the next incident that happens when they repeal the rule again. I could see your justifications stretching as far as saying the accident was understandable, but I'd clarify that first comment if I were in your shoes. Wouldn't want to give people the wrong idea.
7
uzlonewolf Apr 1, 2026 +1
I consider not paying people for months at a time causing them to change careers or move overseas as a way of reducing the workforce, even if they claim it's not.
1
ForsakenRacism Apr 1, 2026 +1
Don’t give them credit for making that some plan. That’s just their incompetence
1
DaytonaJoe Mar 31, 2026 +131
As much as I can't stand Trump, atc has been severely understaffed since the 80s. 
131
Vectrex221 Mar 31, 2026 +137
Thank you Ronald Reagan.
137
subpar_sapphoe Mar 31, 2026 +56
My second favorite thing after (correctly) blaming Trump for anything bad, is (correctly) blaming Reagan for anything bad. It's hilarious how often you can go "Man, this thing sucks, I wonder why?" and the answer is Reagan.
56
nauticalsandwich Apr 1, 2026 +1
The deregulation of the airline industry under Reagan was good. It made air travel actually affordable for ordinary Americans.
1
blackweebow Apr 1, 2026 +1
Aka Trump 1.0
1
itsmistyy Apr 1, 2026 +1
He's from the government and he's here to help
1
karmapuhlease Apr 1, 2026 +1
And Bush, and Clinton, and Bush, and Obama, and Trump, and Biden. It's been 45 years of both parties failing to solve this obvious crisis. 
1
cb148 Mar 31, 2026 +23
Yeah, but I’m sure the government shut down, and threatening to fire controllers who called out sick, definitely didn’t help.
23
DaytonaJoe Mar 31, 2026 +19
As a controller (and the guy you replied to) I can confirm that stuff is true. Morale is lower than it's ever been. Just saying that the main issues we face, we've been facing for 40 years. Trump is just a little extra kick in the balls for people who are already down. 
19
Bizarrebazaars Apr 1, 2026 +5
Yep. And as you know, the criteria for being a controller are so high and strict that even just physical + mental health and many prescriptions can be disqualifiers. Aside from that, the odd schedule, rigorous trainings, workplace stress, zero tolerance for any drug use (cannabis included), often mandatory 6 day work weeks…. The majority of Americans certainly could NEVER do the job or last in the career.  I feel like once long time controllers retire, we will all be even more fucked.
5
ForsakenRacism Mar 31, 2026 +40
All the ATC issues are because of Reagan
40
seeasea Mar 31, 2026 +17
May have started it, but we've had 6 presidents since, and 16 FAA administrators - nearly 40 years. Lots of opportunities to fix the problem At some point you have to take responsibility for it. It's like blaming FDR for healthcare problems in the US. 
17
Bizarrebazaars Apr 1, 2026 +3
Let’s be real though: The vast majority of Americans could NEVER do the job, last in the career, or even be qualified to be accepted into initial training to begin with. The requirements and expectations high and strict. Even just how people who b**** so hard about needing to give up weed alone…. We’re so fucked even more once senior, long time controllers retire…
3
ForsakenRacism Apr 1, 2026 +1
You literally need 1 year of work experience to get hired. It’s a joke
1
PartyWithRobots Apr 1, 2026 +1
Yeah but you are hard age capped at 31. You can’t become a controller after that. That limits most people except those who jumped into the career from the get go. I suspect that is a major reason for shortages across the board. What issues did Reagan create?
1
ForsakenRacism Apr 1, 2026 +2
Ok but most people looking for a career are under 31 Reagan fired them all so it creates this cycle where there’s huge hiring waves and then huge retiring waves. Cus all the replacements retired at the same time and now all the replacement replacements are getting ready to retire
2
pixeltackle Mar 31, 2026 +143
How many times do we have to learn to stop putting MBAs in positions controlling anything important to life & limb?
143
mishap1 Mar 31, 2026 +98
Air Traffic Control is currently being managed by a former lumberjack, Real World tv personality, and Fox Business host. I think an MBA or two would be helpful here.
98
Violin1990 Mar 31, 2026 +30
Nah. An MBA would tell you AI could do ATC's job
30
mgtkuradal Mar 31, 2026 +25
You’re absolutely right, there is a plane already on the runway! I’ve updated the map to show both of those planes occupying the runway.
25
Bad_Idea_Hat Mar 31, 2026 +2
...wait a min-
2
mishap1 Mar 31, 2026 +2
You don't think they're already asking ChatGPT that right now?
2
PartyWithRobots Apr 1, 2026 +1
Honestly might be an unpopular take but I feel AI would actually be good for something like ATC in the long term. It seems like a such a high pressure job for humans where you have to keep track of so many things at once. “AI” isn’t inherently bad and it seems like it would excel at keeping track of a multitude of moving variables and a high volume of data all at once. At the very least it could be used to reduce the load and take stress off of human controllers. I feel computers would excel similarly to robotic factories. People and planes kinda act like all the moving pieces of production lines and all the robots moving around the factory floor. In terms of safety fears it’s not like we aren’t trusting our lives to a computer autopilot already. Computers are also already controlling pretty much every other traffic control system in our lives from traffic lights to trains. Why are we throwing humans into such a high stakes position where the thought of lives is constantly stressing them out and where a simple mistake can end in such tragedy. AI doesn’t inherently mean shitty LLM models that spout nonsense. **Edit:** For the record I’m not some AI bro trying to take people’s jobs. I just always think about all the controllers whose simple errors have caused lives to be lost. I just think that’s a shitty amount of responsibility to put on anyone’s shoulders. I make a mistake at work and like I have to fix something in a spreadsheet and I move on the next day. Meanwhile they make a similar mistake and people die and they are left with a life time of guilt. Let computers bear that burden assuming it can be done properly.
1
SowingSalt Mar 31, 2026
I bet a vehicle vector tracking program could help, but I'm not an NBA or safety professional.
0
M90Motorway Mar 31, 2026 +13
There is a good British docu-drama called The Day Britain Stopped where a rail strike leads to travel chaos. The climax appears to be very similar to what has happened here with overworked Air Traffic Control leading to very unfortunate consequences.
13
youtocin Apr 1, 2026 +7
Good thing Reagan made it illegal for ATC employees to strike. Problem solved!
7
Bishopjones2112 Mar 31, 2026 +21
I truly hope all ATC members refuse to work when they are tasked with more workload than safely manageable and or are without properly working systems. That what this tells me
21
TauCabalander Mar 31, 2026 +39
The controller was performing what used to be 3 jobs: 1. Air traffic controller 2. Ground controller 3. Terminal controller Not surprising he got confused when an emergency incident ocurred. Also, a controller used to be given the option to hand-off responsibilities to another controller when an emergency occurred so that he could focus on that.
39
3BlindMice1 Mar 31, 2026 +18
Look kid, you just don't understand. If there's someone there to hand work off to, that means there's someone in there doing *nothing* Can you imagine that? Someone behind paid be be present and make sure there's an extra hand when things go wrong, but on most occasions, the dollars spent are completely non-productive? We simply can't allow that kind of thing to go on in this business. /s in case anyone didn't realize
18
promonalg Apr 1, 2026 +4
Damn I almost missed the scarcm flag..
4
KDR_11k Apr 1, 2026 +1
Or at least don't allow takeoffs if they are juggling more planes than they can handle...
1
whogotthekeys2mybima Mar 31, 2026 +23
boss: we're going to have you on ground and air today. ATC: I'm already doing air sir boss: Listen, this is the job, don't worry about that, we're short staffed. We've got a line out the door of people who would love to be in this tower doing your job ATC: Copy, sir. # News: LaGuardia controller staffing may have violated procedures on night of collision, document shows"
23
scytob Mar 31, 2026 +9
we need to staff critical positions like this to account for bad weather, more planes than expected and if that means we are overstaffed 99% of the time, thats ok because it there to protect us for the 1% of the time
9
FineScratch Mar 31, 2026 +13
I've been fighting this fight my entire life you don't staff for normal operations you staff for emergencies
13
tonofunnumba1 Mar 31, 2026 +8
They mean we want to cut staffing and blame workers.
8
Neither_Relative_252 Apr 1, 2026 +8
Anyone whose ever had a job before knows this headline is bullshit. - signed a nurse who works in an American Healthcare system. (Our resources get cut every yr. If not daily.
8
Neither_Relative_252 Apr 1, 2026 +3
Also.. there is a shit ton of research on these failures that lead to death and near misses in every industry healthcare, construction, airlines, shit.. everywhere so they're super aware it's a systematic issue but saying that admits fault in oversight coupled with negligence which may lead to a payout. So mums the word 🤫
3
lizardman49 Apr 1, 2026 +2
The fact that doctors abd nurses are even legally allowed to work the insane hours yall are forced to pull is ridiculous.
2
Neither_Relative_252 Apr 1, 2026 +2
Right. As if they're not aware fatigue in all these roles plays a major part in judgment, time reaction, hand eye coordination. Its all been proven but this is the headline. "Employee messed up"🙄.
2
QualityOverQuant Apr 1, 2026 +4
Ok can someone please explain what exactly happened or why? I mean the fire engine on the tarmac .. I see it but don’t understand why?
4
Sharkella Apr 1, 2026 +8
A United flight declared an emergency resulting in the dispatch of the fire truck. The fire truck sought permission to cross the active runway to get to the United plane from ground control and Air Canada was given permission to land from ATC on the same runway.
8
QualityOverQuant Apr 1, 2026 +2
Holy Christ. Thank you for the response and not humiliating me for asking. I couldn’t understand what happened here since I saw the video of the fire truck and was wondering what they were doing on a live track. Damn man!!! This is a collosal screw up. I wonder who blames who!!! Really. Who would want to do this job in the future when ur life’s literally in the hands of idiots
2
logicalcommenter4 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Further context is that the controller did correct their mistake and told the fire truck to stop multiple times, however the fire truck kept going. Who knows if the fire truck would have been hit regardless though.
1
Haunting_Explorer376 Mar 31, 2026 +7
Charge management with manslaughter
7
iggnac1ous Mar 31, 2026 +5
When I left my original federal agency, I had been forced to support 400 various batch/online computer programs in addition to 4 various front end support modules. The last error I made was being overruled into placing a program into production at the last minute. THAT made me MISS a period within an update which caused every account to begin crashing the next morning. My comment to management during a sitrep the next morning was, “I told them THAT program wasn’t ready for production, BUT I was overruled”
5
ncc74656m Mar 31, 2026 +6
"may have violated policies" they say, when referring to a controller who was not the manager, and who could not have been responsible for the decision.
6
issm Mar 31, 2026 +8
"Controller **staffing**" may have violated policies.
8
ncc74656m Mar 31, 2026 +1
Ooooh, missed that, thank you!
1
tsa_finest Apr 1, 2026 +2
It's only ok if nothing bad happens
2
Numba1Dunner Apr 1, 2026 +2
If this guy gets blamed he should do a press conference to explain the working conditions and staffing levels so that he isnt the one thrown under the bus.
2
Mo_Jack Apr 1, 2026 +2
And will the people responsible for gutting so many of our government agencies, be held responsible for their criminally negligent behavior? They wanted to bring their "move fast & break things" attitude to government. And that is exactly what they did. They didn't find fraud & waste or abuse. They were the fraud and abuse. DOGE and the White House should be held criminally liable.
2
pcurve Mar 31, 2026 +1
something so disturbing about this picture. Sad.
1
Mobile-Bar7732 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Time to get rid of D*umbf**ck Duffy.
1
tonitalksaboutit Apr 1, 2026 +1
I just hope that that traffic controller is doing alright.
1
dodadoler Mar 31, 2026 -10
Well I mean I’m sure it’s against code to have a truck & plane on the runway at the same time.
-10
tinny66666 Mar 31, 2026 -8
A collision is most certainly not best practice. 
-8
← Back to Board