· 178 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 3, 2026 at 12:04 AM

Lawmakers vow to force Pam Bondi to testify despite ouster

Posted by plz-let-me-in



🚩 Report this post

178 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Colonel-Mooseknuckle Apr 3, 2026 +1801
Getting fired from your job doesn't give you immunity.
1801
zubuneri Apr 3, 2026 +707
Matt Gaetz avoided investigation over sex trafficking a minor by stepping down. 
707
oynutta Apr 3, 2026 +442
By choice of the congresspeople still there. They let him go. Did not have to.
442
TheGringoDingo Apr 3, 2026 +1
Let’s hope it keeps him away from the job this time, too, or we’ll learn the hard way why not investigating things can backfire.
1
tRfalcore Apr 3, 2026 +1
rich congressmen don't want it to ever be a thing to hold hold rich congressmen to the law, they're all in it together
1
el_trauko87 Apr 3, 2026 +119
Matt gaetz is a f****** piece of shit
119
gooch_crawler Apr 3, 2026 +30
I can't wait until all these pieces of shit have to flee the country or go to jail for life.
30
el_trauko87 Apr 3, 2026 +18
Lmao I think of the same. But flee to where? Maga is making sure no american is welcome anywhere decent. Best bet for maga is israel
18
Plaster_Mind Apr 3, 2026 +1
in Finnish politics we had this guy who filled almost every stereotype of a MAGA type. first he was fired from a far right party for being too dumb even for them, then founded a party called "Power belongs to people" and when that didn't take off and government started looking into his debts, finally fled to Russia. I expect something similar for real MAGA if there ever is a government in USA again willing to hold them responsible.
1
Luna__Moonkitty Apr 3, 2026 +1
Was that guy Tony Halme by any chance? The former pro wrestler that had "exit only" tattooed on his butt?
1
Plaster_Mind Apr 3, 2026 +1
A more recent case called Ano Turtiainen Edit: and to clarify, him fleeing to Russia happened last year.
1
Smitty_jp Apr 3, 2026 +1
I think they only want american monetary support, and not actual americans.
1
JohnBrownSurvivor Apr 3, 2026 +1
Just today, apparently, they didn't even let American soldiers into bomb shelters in Israel. They want Americans to go fight in Iran, but they don't want them in any Israeli bomb shelters. They are quite literally the most elitist shits on the face of the whole planet.
1
ShadowNick Apr 3, 2026 +13
Yup but still got away with it somehow.
13
el_trauko87 Apr 3, 2026 +14
Yes. Corruption runs deep. At least let's never forget
14
starliteburnsbrite Apr 3, 2026 +6
That "somehow" being the tacit agreement between Republicans and Democrats to not go after Republicans because they'll retaliate against Dems. They unfortunately didn't make the reverse promise.
6
kings_account Apr 3, 2026 +1
I got called a bot for saying they’re controlled opposition. If it quacks like a duck…. weird how so many people hide their profile in this sub isn’t it?
1
sasquatchsdick Apr 3, 2026 +1
Dude I got trashed for saying the same. Some moron was calling me an israeli bot. I said oh so that would mean I work for the people your idols support? Good times lol Fuckin those folks almost have me convinced we earned this shit show
1
Mike_Kermin Apr 3, 2026 +1
You should be trashed for it. It's stupid. And there's a non-zero chance you learnt your lines from actual bots. All it is, is a big complicated set of problems distilled into a nice easy to understand package. Yay conspiracies are easy. But it's simply not sensible. > that would mean I work for the people your idols support? Good times lol .... No, it wouldn't, because they DON'T agree with your conspiracy. Come on mate, pink stuff, use it. > we earned this shit show Yeah, little bit. But it's collective, you're all in it together so don't worry about that. Here's a new conspiracy for you, did you know, that when you undermine opposition to extremism, you're helping the extremists. Ohhhhhh. Yeah I know, do you wanna be Russia 2.0, because that's what you're copying here. Who do you think came up with the rhetoric you're spouting?
1
[deleted] Apr 3, 2026 +1
[removed]
1
Mike_Kermin Apr 3, 2026 +1
No no, no one did that. > You sound like a maga toddler lol No, I don't, I sound like someone who's sick of Americans being so f****** stupid, that it's putting my fuel costs up and risking nuclear war.
1
XSinTrick6666 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Trump WH and MAGA - chock full of pedos, criminals, rapists of all stripes Trump has all of Epstein's stuff -- I bet he has Kushner and Witkoff going around collecting hush money from it... If Trump isn't continuing the Epstein racket, why is he surrounded by so many Epstein marks?
1
mercluke Apr 3, 2026 +1
i heard he’s a f****** children
1
mindspork Apr 3, 2026 +1
Now now now. Matt Gaetz is a child-f****** piece of shit.
1
TabsAZ Apr 3, 2026 +1
Watch Trump re-nominate him for AG now
1
f8Negative Apr 3, 2026 +14
There was a congressional investigation, but its sealed for their eyes only.
14
BabypintoJuniorLube Apr 3, 2026 +17
We don't need a public investigation to see he used public view on Venmo to pay $600 to a 16 year old girl, who his best friend later went to prison for raping.
17
AllowMe2Retort Apr 3, 2026 +4
[Their eyes probably looked this surprised](https://i.imgur.com/HcqoxlF.jpeg)
4
s_s Apr 3, 2026 +1
Matt Gaetz was only about Gaetz.  The Epstein files are about Trump. Subpoenaing Bondi is about investigating Trump's coverup.  Much more useful.
1
supercali45 Apr 3, 2026 +45
She sweating now … used and abused by the Pedo … he won’t be protecting her now .. she should just sing and release the Epstein files
45
gokiburi_sandwich Apr 3, 2026 +1
She’ll be pardoned anyway
1
Xx_sO_eDgY_lol69_xX Apr 3, 2026 +1
She'll have a pardon held indefinitely over her head anyway* Edit: there's no current mechanism for a pardon to be undone. Under our current set of rules a pardon is absolute. Once she is officially pardoned she has no reason to stay silent. He will dangle the carrot, as that's really the only move to guarantee her silence.
1
Blackthorn79 Apr 3, 2026 +1
They'll let her soak up as much blame as possible while her replacement shreds everything they don't want to come out. Even if they get her to testify she'll play incompetent and carry the water for Trump and get the pardon as a reward. Just like Oliver North.
1
HereForTheComments57 Apr 3, 2026 +7
Wouldn't it technically be easier to drag her in now?
7
WeirdIndividualGuy Apr 3, 2026 +1
Unfortunately no. Congress can’t enforce a subpoena and I doubt Trump’s FBI will do anything to help
1
GailaMonster Apr 3, 2026 +1
Is that really true? Absolutely no way to enforce a subpoena?
1
roastbeeftacohat Apr 3, 2026 +1
they have three options. they can ask the justice department to do it, but they will only do that if they believe congress has a legeslateive interest in the persons testemony. in a normal government they don't always enforce. they can sue, which will take years in court so nobody ever does thta. or they can invoke the power of inherent contempt granted to them by the constitution. Have the sergeant at arms produce [The Mace of The Republic](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Mace_of_the_U.S._House_of_Representatives_%28front%29.png), and arrest the person. this has not been done since 1934, and nobody's sure what would happen.
1
GailaMonster Apr 3, 2026 +1
The doj lacks the political will to bother, and I doubt Congress does, either
1
roastbeeftacohat Apr 3, 2026 +1
no doubt cash don't care, but it's not a matter of political will with congress; it's never really a matter of will in politics.
1
GailaMonster Apr 3, 2026 +1
Cash? If you meant Kash, that’s the FBI, not DOJ. Disagree with the rest of your comment, too.
1
freakers Apr 3, 2026 +1
I remember Steve Bannon being criminally prosecuted for inherent contempt charges and a quick search informs me that Congress had the cooperation of the DoJ to actually bring the charges against him after they had voted to say that he had committed said offenses.
1
roastbeeftacohat Apr 3, 2026 +1
>Steve Bannon being criminally prosecuted for inherent contempt charges inherent contempt dosen't involve the DoJ at all and is not a criminal charge. Inherent contempt is a charge and arrest entierly under the authoraty of congress >Congress had the cooperation of the DoJ sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. it's up to the DoJ.
1
WeirdIndividualGuy Apr 3, 2026 +1
No way for *Congress* to enforce a subpoena without the Justice Dept
1
Accomplished_Age7883 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Least she can do is update the Dow!
1
Background-War9535 Apr 3, 2026 +1
But it does give you a reason to get back at the guy who fired you.
1
ElectricSliderz Apr 3, 2026 +1
She’s still hoping for the pardon. He must be dangling it out there to keep her in line.
1
King_Chochacho Apr 3, 2026 +1
Not like she's about to do a heel turn. Mega case of amnesia incoming.
1
onlyreason4u Apr 3, 2026 +1
No, but Trump can still pardon her if she keeps her mouth shut. Same with everyone else in his administration and possibly himself.
1
tykeryerson Apr 3, 2026 +1
Im hearing that she couldn't plead the fifth as AG, but now as a private citizen she can... I really hope this is not true but sure would make sense.
1
AlethaC Apr 3, 2026 +1
Is she going to remain loyal to Trump…or throw him under the bus?
1
xtothewhy Apr 3, 2026 +1
Does it stall though?
1
Steinrikur Apr 3, 2026 +1
I would be cool with offering her immunity if her testimony puts some of this administration behind bars
1
SubGeniusX Apr 3, 2026 +1
What happens if she decides to just refuse to appear?
1
spaceocean99 Apr 3, 2026 +1
She probably signed one of those Trump NDAs. She won’t talk. She proved she didn’t have to explain anything or answer any questions. Zero repercussions.
1
Juliuscesear1990 Apr 3, 2026 +318
Until there are actual punishments for perjury, it's all just a clown show. No second chances, no oopsie poopsies if you lie and confirm the lie and are proven wrong then actual jail time. I'm not talking about slight discrepancies or anything but simple questions with simple answers that the person answering is clearly lying (Alex Jones is a very recent example)
318
iPinch89 Apr 3, 2026 +62
Thankfully Trump set the stage by pressing charges against Comey. Now its totally normal and cool! It'll have to wait till next admin.
62
Rootfifth Apr 3, 2026 +32
I hope the Democrats are looking at what new precedents have been set and take advantage of them but I worry they won't.
32
iPinch89 Apr 3, 2026 +48
If I was the next President, I would openly tell Congress that I will abuse every loophole every president abused over the last 25 years....and I would also sign every bill they sent to my desk to take those powers away. My campaign slogan would be something about Restore Balance or something. Our checks and balances are fucked and need fixing
48
Rootfifth Apr 3, 2026 +23
My belief is that the only way to fix any of the nonsense we have seen under Trump or even Bush would be for Democrats to abuse it in the same way. Republicans are never going to come to the table to vote for a bill that limits power that only their party is willing to use.
23
inspectoroverthemine Apr 3, 2026 +1
No- because the SCOTUS has shown us multiple times that they're willing to make non-binding rulings against dems and in favor of repubs. Democrats attempting to 'game the system' will have their attempt blocked, while Trumps is blessed by the same court. Explicit laws need to be written, and congress needs to stop abdicating their duties and responsibilities.
1
kapsama Apr 3, 2026 +1
See this is why even if Trump loses in 2028 the US is toast. In a functional democracy an obviously ideologically captured supreme court would be dissolved and the offenders made to answer for their corruption.
1
creepy_doll Apr 3, 2026 +1
It's because of this thinking that we are where we are now. It's not only the republicans that expanded the power of the executive. Both parties have taken turns expanding it, and that is why we are here now. Your line of thought is a trap that may well lead to something even worse than trump(if that's even possible)
1
ApexMM Apr 3, 2026 +1
this is 100% what needs to happen and is a very good idea
1
PM_ME_YOUR_PRIORS Apr 3, 2026 +1
I wouldn't bother telling Congress until Trump, Vance, Hegseth, and probably some others are already in The Hague to stand trial for crimes against humanity.
1
creepy_doll Apr 3, 2026 +1
For the longest time they haven't because they're afraid of blowback. Both parties are NOT the same, dems are generally better. BUT both parties are one big "elites club" that takes care of themselves, and they more or less have maintained an unwritten rule of not going after each other. In the very worst cases, so long as someone resigns the buck has stopped there. Hopefully this changes and we see more accountability for lawmakers, whichever side of the aisle they may stand on.
1
The_Roshallock Apr 3, 2026 +1
Right. I remember watching a committee meeting years ago where some business person was essentially caught lying to the committee about whatever the subject was. The Republicans had the committee and the chair asked if they would like the opportunity to amend their testimony at the conclusion of the committee meeting, effectively allowing them to get their story straight. Excuse me, what? If any ordinary person sat before congress, lied to their faces with a smug grin, and was caught doing so, they would be sitting in jail. Full stop. End of discussion. The End. Goodnight. Perjury is almost never prosecuted. I get why, at least to some degree. Willingly telling a lie, and unknowingly telling an untruth are not the same. Intent matters. I get that, I really do. But come on. Congress critters, members of the excutive, police officers, etc. get away with it on the regular because they know they can.
1
carbonqubit Apr 3, 2026 +1
There’s a big difference between perjury by a regular citizen and by an elected or appointed government official at the top of the hierarchy. Leaders should be held to a higher standard, especially given the power and trust placed in them. What’s troubling is how often that standard seems to break down in practice. When dishonesty is normalized at the top, it sends a broader signal about what’s acceptable. We tell young people that actions have consequences, yet the political environment they’re growing up in often shows the opposite, where behavior that would be punished elsewhere is tolerated or even rewarded.
1
Nightthre Apr 3, 2026 +6
Right? Even if they still drag her up there, then what? She lies or claims incompetence about everything and just goes home after.
6
Randall_McRandall Apr 3, 2026 +284
The DOW is going to have drop quite a bit to get a straight answer from her.
284
learns_the_hard_way Apr 3, 2026 +31
Minus today even the DOW seems out of Pam Bondi
31
AlarmingAffect0 Apr 3, 2026 +1
The DOW (in its best Zach de la Rocha voice): ["TESTIFY!"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3dvbM6Pias)
1
KokonutMonkey Apr 3, 2026 +1
If they can manage to haul her in front if a panel again, that would be very funny final question to close the hearing. 
1
sawit_tilitfalls Apr 3, 2026 +58
Bond isn't unemployed. She is only one of the puppetmasters. She will get a new title, hide behind the curtain, like she is the Wizard of Oz . She is no Kristi Noem. Her secrets are WAY more valuable. Don't underestimate that woman.
58
Zulmoka531 Apr 3, 2026 +28
Hell, supposedly she was “let go” because she wasn’t pushing Trump’s agenda hard enough! So all the horrible things she has done, still weren’t good enough and she’s still loyal to Trump.
28
sawit_tilitfalls Apr 3, 2026 +3
Taco caved
3
OJConcentrates Apr 3, 2026 +1
I agree 100%. I think she is very intelligent, and even moreso vile.
1
TheAskewOne Apr 3, 2026 +1
She’s been at it for decades. She already protected Trumpstein when she was the AG in Florida. Trump and her go way back, and she most likely did a lot of shady things for him.
1
pppjurac Apr 3, 2026 +1
She will stick to USA as long Mango Mussolini administration is in power. After that she will run abroad, to London, Moscow or some Gulf state.
1
NoZucchini5423 Apr 3, 2026 +1
I imagine most of them will leave if it looks like they will lose.
1
danappropriate Apr 3, 2026 +49
She’ll sit there and plead the 5th to every question. She’s now a private citizen who is not acting as a representative of the office.
49
theb0tman Apr 3, 2026 +1
is she allowed to do that outside of a criminal proceeding?
1
AlexHimself Apr 3, 2026 +1
Her being attorney general or the private citizen makes no material difference to the way she would testify. She didn't lose some immunity by losing her job. She's always had to tell the truth and if she didn't, it's been a crime. Being attorney general doesn't mean she can still commit crimes when she's under oath or testifying to Congress.
1
kapsama Apr 3, 2026 +1
Yeah but you can't plead the 5th while working for Trump. Now she's lost her job.
1
Doug_Reynholm Apr 3, 2026 +1
I'm not a lawyer, but doesn't the 5th amendment only prevent you from being forced to giving testimony that would incriminate yourself? If they ask her "hey did Trump f*** those kids on Epstein Island", she wouldn't be incriminating herself by answering.
1
Tigerballs07 Apr 3, 2026 +1
There is the idea that if she knowingly helped hide that information it is a crime and therefore would be incriminating herself.
1
Strongest-There-Is Apr 3, 2026 +1
This is the correct answer.
1
AlexHimself Apr 3, 2026 +1
Lol no it's incorrect.
1
tmountain Apr 3, 2026 +1
“I do not recall…”
1
CivilPersonality3162 Apr 3, 2026 +39
Is it possible, though?
39
Routine_Bit_8184 Apr 3, 2026 +40
well she is unemployed now, she has nothing but time.
40
Slpwith1knifopen Apr 3, 2026 +12
But how is there DOW looking? That's all that matters!
12
sawit_tilitfalls Apr 3, 2026 +2
More like.. DOH!
2
profane_vitiate Apr 3, 2026 +23
Congress, being the highest legislative body in the USA, can subpoena whoever the f*** they want to. There is judicial oversight of this, however, and this power is not absolute and is subject to review and scrutiny. The lawfulness of the subpoena, though, doesn't really come until there's a clear intent to enforce that subpoena (contempt, etc). Which is to say that the review process traditionally kicks in some time after the subpoena is issued -- the judiciary has not been particularly game on reviewing them at the moment of issuance.
23
Happier21 Apr 3, 2026 +1
But there is another rabbit in the hat….they will make her testify one way or another.
1
profane_vitiate Apr 3, 2026 +4
She can plead the fifth for everything, just like her bosses have done. Without the DOJ releasing records that prove her to have perjured herself, which might take years if you can even get them released, very little chance. She's holding on to a pardon. She'll plead the 5th to everything via her lawyer, and it's not like the government is going to file a suit against her. She knows what she did, and she knows the possible scope of "actually enforcing the laws" a few years from now when the neolibs take the helm again. Those milquetoast motherfuckers have gotta make an example of at least one person, probably by putting them on probation for child r*** and maybe collusion, and she wants to make sure she's got her "get out of jail free" card.
4
simic947 Apr 3, 2026 +9
Like they did with Hillary and Bill despite not holding office for years?
9
ENORMOUS_HORSECOCK Apr 3, 2026 +5
She'll probably get a subpoena and no show
5
LovelieLuna Apr 3, 2026 +4
Except the gop fucked up by threatening hillary clinton with contempt for it. I know dems are spineless af, but even they will want to retaliate.
4
stuck_in_the_desert Apr 3, 2026 +8
For Congress to subpoena someone?
8
WeirdIndividualGuy Apr 3, 2026 +1
Congress can subpoena whoever they want. But Congress can’t enforce a subpoena, that’s the executive’s job. And I doubt Trump’s FBI will force Bondi to show up to testify…against Trump
1
NWStormbreaker Apr 3, 2026 +1
FBI can't compel testimony but the DOJ can charge contemp and throw you in prison for a year, like they did with Bannon.
1
WeirdIndividualGuy Apr 3, 2026 +1
Cool. Let’s see Trump’s own DoJ do that against Bondi for not testifying against Trump
1
NWStormbreaker Apr 3, 2026 +1
It isn't likely, but it doesn't mean those consequences go away, they just won't face it until the next admin.
1
stuck_in_the_desert Apr 3, 2026 +1
Yeah better to just assume nothing will work and comply in advance
1
Academic-Business-45 Apr 3, 2026 +13
She is getting a parachute and a pardon, so what
13
JeffSteinMusic Apr 3, 2026 +12
[remembers brett kavanaugh and corey lewandowski and shrugs]
12
Straight-Ad6926 Apr 3, 2026 +19
Lawmakers vowing to do things is my favorite genre of fiction. It’s right up there with The check is in the mail and This meeting could have been an email.
19
DuckTalesLOL Apr 3, 2026 +5
All she's going to say is "I don't know, I don't have access to the files anymore"
5
Spatul8r Apr 3, 2026 +1
They can't charge a husband and wife for the same crime.
1
thirtyseven1337 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Take to the sea!
1
UniversityNew9254 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Is firing someone who has knowledge of all the dirt on you the smartest thing to do? She’ll squeal like a stuck pig when the screws start getting turned…possibly earlier than that if Donnie start s**t talking her.
1
Pleasant_Pen8744 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Keep your friends close and your enemies under the bus.
1
GreyRobb Apr 3, 2026 +1
Fair question, but I suspect he very likely also has dirt on her (going back to her days of killing cases for him in Florida in exchange for ~~bribes~~ campaign contributions), AND the ability to pardon her for all the crimes she’s willfully committed for him. He used her up, and now it’s time for a fresh target dummy to sucker into the job.
1
gimmesheltah Apr 3, 2026 +1
Doubtful. He'll be paying her off. This admin is rotten to the core.
1
simplethingsoflife Apr 3, 2026 +5
Jail time.
5
MagicalUnicornFart Apr 3, 2026 +1
Sure. I'll believe it when i see it. Forcing anything is not something the D's are good at. ever.
1
imnotactuallyaperson Apr 3, 2026 +3
Hopefully she spills the beans now
3
Big-Band5171 Apr 3, 2026 +3
nothing says government efficiency like waiting until someone is fired to finally decide their testimony is mandatory. she’ll just say she doesn't recall and be at a lobbying firm by monday.
3
D_Plissken Apr 3, 2026 +1
Well yeah, subpoena's dont stop just because you change jobs... Lord this is dumb
1
Senor_Arroyos Apr 3, 2026 +1
Lock her up
1
SquidLee Apr 3, 2026 +1
MMW: Bondi will get away scot free....IF they get her to testify it will be political theatre ala the Dow is over 50k. All the more, nonetheless, if she catches any charges they'll be federal and Cheeto Jesus will pardon her. Doesn't everyone know this? I feel like I'm the only one taking crazy pills!
1
mistersuave Apr 3, 2026 +1
She can't hide inside the bases now?
1
strangeluv_-_- Apr 3, 2026 +1
But the DOW! The DOW is over two fitty!
1
blow_slogan Apr 3, 2026 +1
Good! You know Kristi Noem and Pam Bondi were fired because they are scheduled to answer under oath and Trump thought it would get them out.
1
Inspectorgadget4250 Apr 3, 2026 +4
If she wants her pardon from the Great Pumpkin, she's wearing Loctite lipstick.
4
FlexFanatic Apr 3, 2026 +2
And what are they hoping to gain by forcing her to testify?
2
rit13t Apr 3, 2026 +2
Make a deal Pam and stay away from open windows.
2
waffleking9000 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Good, her getting fired is just her attempting to escape responsibility. She has done her job stonewalling congressional enquiries.
1
Wild-Soil3808 Apr 3, 2026 +1
"Pam Blondi" Please call her Pam Blondi. She loves it.
1
TomDelouise Apr 3, 2026 +1
She’s not gonna remember and plead the 5th a bunch of
1
0neAy0pen Apr 3, 2026 +1
She’d rather perjure herself and lie like usual than turn against the 🤡
1
Orgasmic_interlude Apr 3, 2026 +1
…why does this make sense to him? I suppose he could have damaging komprimat on bondi but now she’s probably more exposed with way more motivation to turn heel on him.
1
NotSoGouda Apr 3, 2026 +1
Put her ass in prison
1
Darkstar197 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Is she going to give congress another analysis of the market? The Dow is at 46k!
1
GotSomeUpdogOnUrFace Apr 3, 2026 +1
Would love to see consequences but I doubt that will happen
1
Odd-Neighborhood6086 Apr 3, 2026 +1
I think she should do a tell all book!
1
WontArnett Apr 3, 2026 +1
By “testify” they mean read insults off of a cue card in between spouting conspiracy theories and stock market talking points.
1
NumberNumb Apr 3, 2026 +1
Ah, the real reason she’s being let go….
1
Jammer521 Apr 3, 2026 +1
because congress was getting pissed because the Files weren't being released fast enough and were all redacted, but I'm sure that is the way Trump wanted it, now he is just scapegoating her, I'm sure her replacement will do the same thing
1
Top_Helicopter_1214 Apr 3, 2026 +1
We need nuremberg trials for this administration, with the same punishments on the table.
1
xXBassHero99Xx Apr 3, 2026 +1
"No, I don't have to
1
Hidden_Land_Mine_183 Apr 3, 2026 +1
That's nice. So what happens if she just decides to... keep lying anyway?
1
Wonderful-Impact-598 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Can't excuse herself saying she's too busy serving the country now that she's unemployed. Now she has all the time in the world. May as well do it tomorrow, in fact!
1
canon12 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Depends on how much money he paid her to keep her mouth shut. I don't think she expected such a quick ouster.
1
Catspaw129 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Like that's gonna work? She'll want immunity, a pardon... ...nd a pony.
1
parkinthepark Apr 3, 2026 +1
He created an enemy with nothing to lose 12 days before she’s set to testify about his sex crimes. *The Art of The Deal*
1
Safe_Ant7561 Apr 3, 2026 +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
BradlyPitts89 Apr 3, 2026 +1
The democrats are feckless cowards. They will fail to hold her accountable I guarantee it.
1
CrankinThatHog Apr 3, 2026 +1
What can they presently do to hold her accountable?
1
LeftHandCub Apr 3, 2026 +1
Not so fast… what’s the Dow at?
1
Aggravating_Berry253 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Breaking news lawmakers vow to force bonding to testify Breaking news Pam bonding mysteriously ______
1
Weak_Ad_1370 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Being legally required to testify due to a subpoena is not based on employment. There is so much c*** out there to report on. A Vow to enforce her testimony is an oxymoron. They are vowing to enforce the law? Good lord.
1
joanht Apr 3, 2026 +1
Why not?
1
Rude-Dependent-4353 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Paywalled.
1
kazejin05 Apr 3, 2026 +1
The move should be do subpoena both Bondi and Blanche. If he was the Deputy AG, he wasn't by any means out of the loop on the lack of progress and foot-dragging by his predecessor. Now that he's in charge, even for the interim, he needs to answer too. Bondi has very obviously been thrown under the bus to try to buy some time. I hope the lawmakers are smart enough not to take the obvious bait.
1
Cerblu Apr 3, 2026 +1
Here’s hoping she doesn’t mysteriously fall out of a window in the next few days.
1
Physical-Ad-6170 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Trump will retain her as a personal lawyer and claim attorney/ client privilege for everything.
1
Dlowdown1366 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Yep. A very important role in the "private sector". This is just a chess move
1
Proud_Growth_8818 Apr 3, 2026 +1
It's not like she's going to be busy.
1
Turbo__Sanwich Apr 3, 2026 +1
Endite her on obstruction chargers and give her a plea deal. Then Nuremberg her with the rest of them
1
Severe-Fisherman-962 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Gaetz is probably bummed he was to young to miss out on Epstein Island. He would have been all over that!
1
DamImABeaver Apr 3, 2026 +1
He may have not been at the island but have ypu seen all the weird shit around his adopted son?
1
Swimming_Reserve7172 Apr 3, 2026 +1
She had the chance to do the right thing.. she's a victim her damn self. She knows exactly what went on on that island. She got fired and now she have a cushy job come on Republicans this isn't how Republicans and Democrats interact please and if we have a draft you're ready to send your kids to the war
1
Mysterious-Lick Apr 3, 2026 +1
Good luck with that
1
redwoodtree Apr 3, 2026 +1
How will she testify without staff crated oppo paperwork to read from!?
1
CosmicGeranium Apr 3, 2026 +1
As they should 🤭
1
Smart-Difference7290 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Ouster.  She needs a bullwhip
1
Jammer521 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Bondi did everything Trump told her to do and now he is using her as a scape goat for the Epstein files, the man has no loyalty except to himself, I'm sure the next person to take her place will pretty much do the job the same as Bondi, the entire administration is corrupt
1
Aranxi_89 Apr 3, 2026 +1
Yeah it's clear he fired her almost like a snap reaction, trying to cut off a gangrene limb, but this nasty habit of his won't save him this time.
1
Use1000words Apr 3, 2026 +1
The irony is simply, , , , , , delicious!
1
Sparky-Man Apr 3, 2026 +1
Wonder if she'll change her tune now after being fired for her so-called 'greatest president ever' while the DOW is below 50 thou...
1
Dancing_Cthulhu Apr 3, 2026 +1
If she is brought to testify in the near future however will she justify her betrayal of justice, now the DOW is under 50,000?
1
Weird_Rooster_4307 Apr 3, 2026 +1
This is actually a great ploy. Being now fired, she no longer has any access to any DOJ files. She can now just answer “I don’t know” or “I have been advised to plead the 5th”. All alone the spreading and rewriting of the Epstein files continues.
1
Phronias Apr 3, 2026 +1
She's already lied under oath and she'll do it again.
1
capz1121 Apr 3, 2026 +1
She’ll pass the coverup baton to the next guy. The show will go on until someone is actually held accountable.
1
PrinceCastanzaCapone Apr 3, 2026 +1
Indict that b****
1
Tasty-Performer6669 Apr 3, 2026 +1
How much justice can she purchase?
1
Alwaystired254 Apr 3, 2026
Yeah, that’s gone really well so far. Her grandstanding and just talking about how wonderful Trump is. Whatever
0
← Back to Board