Lawyers for ICE gave false information to justify detaining thousands, filings reveal

Seems like the allegations are that the attorneys lied in immigration courts, not in District Court (though the lawsuit is in federal district court). They probably thought they could get away with it in the kangaroo courts. Hopefully the district court judge can refer them for discipline.

At a certain point I think we just need to do away with jury selection and make it so the first 12 people capable and eligible to serve on the jury are the jury. No dismissing people because they're anti-death penalty on cases where the state is contemplating murdering someone, no dismissing people too knowledgeable about the courts, or people too unsympathetic towards cop testimony. You get the first 12 and that's it.

The more things go on, the more I believe that people who abuse office, and go beyond the bounds of their duty within that office, they need to be able to be held personally accountable for their actions. Cops, lawyers, politicians, whatever. Doctors are personally liable for their screw ups and unethical behavior, there's no reason these other people should be bailed out by the taxpayer. Them thinking they won't have to suffer any more consequences than maybe losing a license just enables bad behavior.

Controversial counterpoint. Disbarment is banning someone from ever holding a Career they've invested in. That's a huge punishment. That career is how you feed your family. It's plenty persuasive to prevent this from happening. The reason it's not working is because currently it's very clear that "No one will try to hold me accountable." No matter how serious your charge, when the administration is corrupt, it will be more prevalent. Disbarment is a satisfactory criminal punishment, and they should be eligible for civil suits, for each impacted person to recover damages. That's the law, and that's fair. There's no value in a punishment policy that punishes someone harshly, if it doesn't A: Dissuade people from doing crimes. B: Make the victim whole. C: Protects the public. Losing your job you dedicated your life to getting, and the chance of ever having your job again is Dissuasive enough. Making the Victim whole is the point of civil suits. They should have their immunity stricken for obvious reasons, but that's an unrelated question. The public is no less safe if a crooked lawyer is forced to sell cars for the rest of his life, than if he's in prison. The safety of the public is primarily supported by removing a crooked lawyer, from practicing law crookedly.

And all done in the service of one senile pedophile.

To be fair, the justice system has actually been two-tiered, monetized, racist, and over-all super flawed since it started.

Rich White men

The Giuliani case goes me hope for sure. Although his misconduct went on for a long time and was vary blatant. But hopefully reason prevails.