LeT seems very generous with titles, everyone's a commander there
54
nonquitt21 hr ago
+11
Like partners at Tiger Global
11
Hopeful-Explorer-44323 hr ago
+16
It is organised into many small and big groups/sleeper cells who do the attacks and local planning. The funding, weapons, training, who /what/where is to be targetted comes from the top brass.
16
fury42015 hr ago
+3
This all makes sense, it's just unfortunate when the media hypes up the significance of people who until they got killed didn't even warrant a mention online in English.
3
Felix-Culpa1 day ago
+184
Unknown gunmen kill another terrorist in Pakistan. A tale as old as…
184
MrPoposcumdumpster1 day ago
+73
As old as Pakistan?
73
Ms74k_ten_c1 day ago
+58
Not very old then.
58
LaysAirBreather1 day ago
+34
Kind of. Because as soon as pakistan was created, they attacked India (2 months after creation to be precise.)
34
Electricity45213238 hr ago
+1
Pakistani tribesmen invaded Kashmir which was "neutral" at the time. This was followed by the Pakistani military moving in as well (this was in 1948 when Hari Singh acceded to India, so it's not "two months"). Neutral in quotation marks as Kashmir's ruler was responsible for carrying out large scall killings and rapes of the local Muslim population. There was no direct attack on India.
1
real-skeptical-bro1 day ago
-75
Mossad.
-75
maxofJupiter11 day ago
+44
Why would mossad care about a Salafi terrorist in Pakistan instead of the many more pressing issues affecting Israeli security?
It was either a rival terrorist group, rival members of the same org, the ISI, maybe India. No one else really cares enough to do this.
44
real-skeptical-bro1 day ago
-28
I was being silly. Mossad busy with other shit. But when an "unknown gunman" kills a high profile terrorist anywhere, Mossad has to be included in the list of usual suspects and I am 100% here for it.
-28
nonquitt21 hr ago
-3
More likely the ISI. Even RAW seems unlikely
-3
Annual_Event_61111 day ago
+173
Looks like the "Unidentified Gunmen" are having another very productive quarter. It’s becoming the most reliable career-ending service in the region...
173
Holiday_Context50331 day ago
+38
Quarterly performance calls are going to be 🔥🔥
38
active2fa21 hr ago
+18
Dhuranders at work?
18
Any-Distance658615 hr ago
+13
Rizwan continuing Hamza's work
13
HotArtichoke45791 day ago
+144
[Hafiz Saeed](https://www.google.com/search?q=Hafiz+Saeed&rlz=1C1CHBF_enIN1127IN1127&oq=crime+hafeez+saeed+in&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRiPAjIHCAIQIRiPAtIBCTEzOTQxajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&sei=ho_vafSANuSp1e8P-vPvgA4&ved=2ahUKEwipo9K-uo6UAxXLia8BHWX3MqkQgK4QegQIARAB), a UN-designated terrorist and founder of the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). He is widely recognized as the mastermind behind the 2008 Mumbai attacks and has a $10 million US bounty on his head
144
ultimate_bond22 hr ago
+30
How many UN designated terrorists are there in Pakistan?
30
Deep_Silver_797121 hr ago
+11
many and in india there r 0 and they say we r the ones
11
Electricity45213238 hr ago
+1
The terrorists in India usually end up occupying political and bureaucratic positions after boasting about ripping wombs off of Muslim women.
1
HuckleberryHot45511 day ago
+114
"Ladies and gentlemen, you are not ready for this"
114
DoLand_Trump_85321 day ago
+50
Na de dil pardesi nu..
50
Spirited-Grab318221 hr ago
+16
tenu nit da rona pai junga
16
HuckleberryHot45511 day ago
+25
Mera bachcha hai tu.
25
DeepResearch70711 day ago
-13
The first film was an absolute banger, the second film (especially after intermission) sorta lost the plot.
-13
Born-Ad1261 day ago
+14
It was the ending for me where it lost the plot. The last fight scene was a bit stretched and had a few typical masala movie tropes (like that chain scene).
14
DeepResearch707115 hr ago
+1
True. THey lost me when Ajit Doval video called Zahoor.
1
_benigngunner_1 day ago
+6
I still feel the film was meant to be one part and during the editing they figured it can be a two part, plus there were certain scene reshoot just a month before release. Second part just felt like a revenge p***/fantasy with insane plot armor.
6
TataHexagone20201 day ago
-2
Why did they even bother to show injuries on the Main character at the end with his incredible plot armor?
-2
Born-Ad1261 day ago
+10
At least the plot armour didn't seem too far-fetched and was interesting. You can't make an entertaining movie without giving some plot armour to the lead anyways.
10
DeepResearch707114 hr ago
-1
No it did become pretty far fetched (that last fight scene). THey lost their touch when they depicted Ajit Doval on a video call with Zahoor. The opening sequence was mind blowing, and the highlight of the movie, if not the entire series. It was downhill from there. Like the gang wars also didn't seem that well stitchhed together, just as if theyy were showing it for the sake of it.
-1
nonquitt1 day ago
+22
Good news!
22
Old_Leshen22 hr ago
+32
Didn't India recently make a movie on these gunmen recently?
32
Deep_Silver_797121 hr ago
+21
yeh it was a great movie do watch it we recommend
21
Fuckyoursadface18 hr ago
-28
Do you think India would send assets and spies into Pakistan. Integrate them, have them build a network and use them to clean up the people who Pakistan is currently at war with?
What's happening, and what has always happened is that internal factions within the ISI orchestrate these killings.
-28
Suggondeezenutz_-_14 hr ago
+19
Lol... Why was Osama living almost in the military academy of Pakistan is they are "at war" with all terrorists?
19
Fuckyoursadface11 hr ago
-6
Where did I say they're at war with ALL terrorists? Just like India is not at war with the BLA. This entire post is brigaded by Indians to push a narrative which is speculatory and simply untrue 😂
-6
PastCryptographer2448 hr ago
+1
Why would india bebat war with BLA? They are not inside india and india is not sending them to Pakistan and to kill innocent citizens based on religion.
1
Fuckyoursadface7 hr ago
+1
Ok so on one hand, the ISI is inept and incompetent.
On the other. They're able to send people into India and launch mass attacks based on religion?
Also, India actively supports the BLA. They're also very strategically aligned with Afghanistan and the Taliban. They are absolutely giving them support and aid under the radar in this war so how does it make sense for them to assassinate members of a group Pakistan is currently at war with?
1
Suggondeezenutz_-_10 hr ago
+1
It's a bit dumb to assume their are factions but that someone as big as Osama wouldn't have a faction.
Truth is that the "factions" are a figment of your imagination. And given how lame and incompetent ISI is, it won't be difficult to imagine intrusion from another country, especially India given the demographic likeness.
1
Fuckyoursadface9 hr ago
+1
The ISI is so lame that apparently everytime there is an attack on Indian soil it's attributed to their networks by the Indians? Interesting.
1
boraam12 hr ago
+1
Good job ISI for killing terrorists
/s
1
Sea_Abroad_65738 hr ago
+1
It's never that simple. While India is certainly not involved in all of these actions, neither is ISI. At times it's just straight up internal conflict amongst terrorists. India sure as hell didn't kill Rehman Dakait (directly or indirectly) neither did ISI (idk if ISI was indirectly involved).
However I wouldn't rule out that India was involved in killing terrorists in pakistan. They can kill who they want to kill in Canada then they can and most likely have done it in pakistan. It just didn't happen with lyari gang wars "at large".
1
fragbot220 hr ago
+15
That’s just terrible…so what’s everyone having for dinner tonight? I think it’ll be leftover pasta for us.
50 Comments