Hi All,
A few days ago, we talked about a few technological and process changes we would be working on in order to improve your Listnook experience and ensure access to timely information is available.
Over the last day we rolled out a behavior change to r/all. The r/all listing gives us a glimpse into what is happening on all of Listnook independent of specific interests or subscriptions. In many ways, r/all is a reflection of what is happening online in general. It is culturally important and drives many conversations around the world.
The changes we are making are to preserve this aspect of r/all—our specific goal being to prevent any one community from dominating the listing. The algorithm change is fairly simple—as a community is represented more and more often in the listing, the hotness of its posts will be increasingly lessened. This results in more variety in r/all.
Many people will ask if this is related to r/the_donald. The short answer is no, we have been working on this change for a while, but I cannot deny their behavior hastened its deployment. We have seen many communities like r/the_donald over the years—ones that attempt to dominate the conversation on Listnook at the expense of everyone else. This undermines Listnook, and we are not going to allow it.
Interestingly enough, r/the_donald was already getting downvoted out of r/all yesterday morning before we made any changes. It seems the rest of the Listnook community had had enough. Ironically, r/EnoughTrumpSpam was hit harder than any other community when we rolled out the changes. That’s Listnook for you. ¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯
As always, we will keep an eye out for any unintended side-effects and make changes as necessary. Community has always been one of the very best things about Listnook—let’s remember that. Thank you for reading, thank you for Listnook-ing, let’s all get back to connecting with our fellow humans, sharing ferret gifs, and making the Listnook the most fun, authentic place online.
Steve
u: I'm off for now. Thanks for the feedback! I'll check back in a couple hours.
Hey Spez,
I'd like to propose an *alternative* to /r/All, which would be something like /r/Outstanding.
Sorting by most upvotes is great. But what I would *really* want to see are those posts that really *exceed* the expectations of their respective sublistnooks. Let's say that /r/Pics regularly has posts that get to 5,000 points. Obviously those will show up in /r/All, even if they're nothing special. It's just because /r/Pics is so big, and the top post is bound to get that high.
But, at the same time, let's say that the /r/PicsOfUnusualBirds sublistnook (not sure if that's a real thing) normally gets only 50 votes per post, but a post today got *100* votes. Whoa! *Double* what they regularly get. That must mean that it's a really good submission, right? That's the kind of content I want to see.
The overall basis of it should be votes by percentage of subscribers, or something along those lines. it needs to take in the population of the sublistnook into account. Obviously there would need to be some control (like if a submission in /r/PicsOfUnusualBirds was linked to in a popular /r/Asklistnook post) to prevent brigading style stuff. But that can all be tweaked; just think about the concept.
--------
Pros of this system (as opposed to /r/All)
* Will allow for better sublistnook discovery because small sublistnooks will be able to get on the list more easily.
* Takes away the advantage of massive default sublistnooks.
* Can't be dominated by one sublistnook regularly, unless it continually exceeds its previous records (which would be really difficult).
* Would really highlight the very best of Listnook or the most important news.
22899
I_AM_STILL_A_IDIOTJun 16, 2016
+1116
Yeah, I like this idea. I moderate quite a few smaller sublistnooks and it's always interesting to see how popular a truly exceptional post can get. Even when they blow up within that sublistnook, /r/all doesn't really give them a fair shake when dropped among the content from defaults.
Case in point: /r/JapanPics hardly cracks 500 points for even the best posts. [But just once we had a post pass 1300 points](https://www.listnook.com/r/japanpics/comments/3vv6rd/tokyos_alleys_by_night_you_can_nearly_smell_the/). Within the sublistnook, that's an outstanding post that everyone loves. But outside of it, it's just another post that can hardly crack the top 100 on /r/all's "hot" list.
Giving "trending" content a bit of the /r/all spotlight, similar to how /r/trendingsublistnooks reserves a little window on the frontpage, would be fantastic.
1116
karmanautJun 16, 2016
+225
A very good example, thanks. I really think that it would show off the best aspects of listnook, both in terms of content *and* what communities will make it into /r/Outstanding.
225
lmMrMeeseeksLookAtMeJun 16, 2016
+79
I'm down with this. I frequent /r/reptiles and /r/beardeddragons and posts there rarely break 100 upvotes. Niche communities have been and will be the reason I continue to come here, this would be a good way to celebrate that.
79
theLAZYmdJun 16, 2016
+11
It will also give new and upcoming sublistnooks some limelight, allowing people to diversify their interests. I think this would be a really cool feature that would promote non-default subs.
On the other hand I can foresee this feature being very quickly abused. I can imagine a sub's members grouping together just to get on /r/outstanding for one shitpost, which wouldn't be difficult as they only need to surpass what they usually get.
11
mrpeach32Jun 16, 2016
+373
An issue with this is that a post that makes it to /r/outstanding suddenly gets +1000 more upvotes just because it's there. Now that [unusual bird pic](http://www.audubon.org/sites/default/files/2548692902_73e058b662_z.jpg) has 200x more votes than expected. How does that factor in for that sublistnook's next popular [unusual bird](https://pixabay.com/static/uploads/photo/2015/06/20/12/14/weird-bird-815733_960_720.jpg)?
If it gets 200 organic subscriber upvotes, it's 4x the natural expected average for the sublistnook. But that 1100+ bird the day before brought that average up? Or maybe 4x isn't really that impressive since the previous one was suddenly 200x? This is an issue with meta-linking in general. Listnook has to decide what people are allowed to vote on.
I like your idea but it is not without it's own flaws that would need [to be considered](http://orig00.deviantart.net/60b2/f/2013/053/9/f/thinking_bird_by_m3sutozil-d5vumuz.jpg).
373
darwin2500Jun 16, 2016
+242
i have said many, many times, I wish I could set an option so that my sort by 'best/top/etc' only counted votes from subscribers to the sub, rather than people who just saw it on /r/all.
You see this a lot in /r/TwoXChromosomes; from looking at the comments, it's pretty easy to tell which posts made it to the /r/all frontpage and got commented/voted/brigaded from there, and which posts just have subscibers posting and voting.
242
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+8
I think that's definitely the solution. If people really want to vote then they can subscribe, growing the newly discovered sub!
8
lasssilverJun 16, 2016
+18
I wonder if a thing like /r/outstanding could be "static" and not have up/down voting of post. It could in it's own sub, but not off the /r/Outstanding page. Comments could still be voted on.
Perhaps an algorithm of what makes it on the page, and then a normal decay algorithm? It would be a thought, but it does affect Listnook's great aspect: up/down voting.
It'd be a page of what gets outstanding votes *from* the subs, but it's place on Outstanding is not vote-able. It could introduce a lot of people to a lot of different subs too.
18
spezJun 16, 2016
+6060
So, that's approximately how the current front page works. We normalize the scores and sort by the most outstanding. It's limited to defaults / subscriptions, though.
You basically describe the new frontpage algorithm I've been fantasizing about. We started work on this, in fact, but we re-allocated that brainpower (u/KeyserSosa) to focus on anti-evil for a while. We have since hired more brainpower and have less evil, so I'm hopeful we can get back to it soon.
6060
reboticonJun 16, 2016
+1019
Can you expand on what you mean by 'having less evil?'
I like this /r/all change and I like that you made an announcement about it.
1019
spezJun 16, 2016
+1919
> Can you expand on what you mean by 'having less evil?'
We've made a lot of progress fighting spam, Account Take Overs (ATOs), and reported abuse over the past few months.
1919
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+292
[deleted]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.45168925090877243
> This comment has been overwritten by [this open source script](https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/10380-listnook-overwrite) to protect this user's privacy. The purpose of this script is to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment. It also helps prevent mods from profiling and censoring.
> If you would like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension [TamperMonkey](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/tampermonkey/dhdgffkkebhmkfjojejmpbldmpobfkfo), or the Firefox extension [GreaseMonkey](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/greasemonkey/) and click Install This Script on [the script](https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/10380-listnook-overwrite) page. Then to delete your comments, simply click on your username on Listnook, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint: use [RES](http://www.listnookenhancementsuite.com/)), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
292
CaptainMarnimalJun 16, 2016
+27
The thing is, if you think about it, do you really want that? Small subs aren't necessarily just hidden gems waiting to be uncovered. Most of them simply have a limited scope that most people wouldn't care about.
Imagine a rant post in /r/Charlotte gets heavily upvoted as someone finally articulates the frustration felt regarding pot holes in the city. Or /r/Helix has a cast member respond to some fan art for the show. Or maybe a popular Minecraft server sublistnook announces a long awaited world reset. If you don't live in Charlotte, NC, and you don't watch the TV show Helix, and you don't play Minecraft on that server, do you still want to see a page full of content from those small communities?
27
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+6
[deleted]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^0.7560388495698638
> This comment has been overwritten by [this open source script](https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/10380-listnook-overwrite) to protect this user's privacy. The purpose of this script is to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment. It also helps prevent mods from profiling and censoring.
> If you would like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension [TamperMonkey](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/tampermonkey/dhdgffkkebhmkfjojejmpbldmpobfkfo), or the Firefox extension [GreaseMonkey](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/greasemonkey/) and click Install This Script on [the script](https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/10380-listnook-overwrite) page. Then to delete your comments, simply click on your username on Listnook, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint: use [RES](http://www.listnookenhancementsuite.com/)), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
6
BirdsArentImportantJun 16, 2016
+11
If you didn't want to see it, couldn't you just not visit it? It may be more cost in programming and implementation than it's worth, but I think the basis of the idea is a good one, and could do well for discovery.
11
WalkingTurtleManJun 16, 2016
+3851
Hey /u/spez, completely unrelated to anything else but I just want to say that I appreciate these announcement posts. I like that the admins are taking a positive role in making my online community better, and I like knowing what kind of changes are occurring.
Please let your team know that at least one listnookor likes what's going on.
3851
thrilldiggerJun 16, 2016
+18
>Please let your team know that at least one listnookor likes what's going on.
Now I'm imagining spez barging into the dev team's area yelling "We did it! At least one listnookor likes what's going on! Pizzas and cake for everyone!"
18
komali_2Jun 16, 2016
+122
I'd like to hop in on that and apologize for drunkenly gushing all over you at your listnook mobile launch party I accidentally stumbled into. Also sorry I ate all your food. But you guys weren't eating it. So.
122
dios_AchilleusJun 16, 2016
+499
Could you add "automatically switching to mobile site" under the "evil" category? I like the desktop site on my mobile. I don't understand why I can be browsing and then suddenly it switches to mobile.
499
DogSnogginsJun 16, 2016
+86
Second this. HATE the redirect, please stop it. I do not like the functionality nor the appearance of the mobile site. I've also tried several listnook apps and no-go as well. I'm quite happy with the desktop - on my desktop AND my mobile, thank you very much : )
Edit: and please don't make me always have to do something else to get back to the desktop site. When I go to listnook.com, I want to go to listnook.com, without having to do a further tweak. Leave my url alone!
86
smoothcicleJun 16, 2016
+37
Completely agree. Recently it's been forcing me to the mobile site every time whereas prior it was seemingly random. If I wanted to use the mobile site of switch to it. The fact I don't means I hate the mobile site with a passion. It sucks, the layout is garbage, inefficient, and harder to use.
37
ThreeLZJun 16, 2016
+45
Yeah, Listnook mobile is shit. Desktop site works great on mobile, I don't understand why they feel the need to man us use something inferior just cause we're on a smaller screen.
45
dizneedaveJun 16, 2016
+13
I complained about this to another company and the response was basically "We have to cater to the lowest common denominator. Sure, your phone can handle it and so can mine but the average visitor is using a random "almost smartphone" made using the cheapest possible hardware. We can't afford to lose those users because they don't know enough to visit the correct URL."
13
sawbones84Jun 16, 2016
+59
[relevant?](https://xkcd.com/869/)
59
xkcd_transcriberJun 16, 2016
+36
[Image](http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/server_attention_span.png)
[Mobile](https://m.xkcd.com/869/)
**Title:** Server Attention Span
**Title-text:** They have to keep the adjacent rack units empty\. Otherwise, half the entries in their \/var\/log\/syslog are just 'SERVER BELOW TRYING TO START CONVERSATION \*AGAIN\*\.' and 'WISH THEY'D STOP GIVING HIM SO MUCH COFFEE IT SPLATTERS EVERYWHERE\.'
[Comic Explanation](https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/869#Explanation)
**Stats:** This comic has been referenced 170 times, representing 0.1480% of referenced xkcds.
---
^[xkcd.com](https://www.xkcd.com) ^| ^[xkcd sub](https://www.listnook.com/r/xkcd/) ^| ^[Problems/Bugs?](https://www.listnook.com/r/xkcd_transcriber/) ^| ^[Statistics](http://xkcdref.info/statistics/) ^| ^[Stop Replying](https://listnook.com/message/compose/?to=xkcd_transcriber&subject=ignore%20me&message=ignore%20me) ^| ^[Delete](https://listnook.com/message/compose/?to=xkcd_transcriber&subject=delete&message=delete%20t1_d4byno3)
36
I_AM_STILL_A_IDIOTJun 16, 2016
+1225
>So, that's approximately how the current front page works. We normalize the scores and sort by the most outstanding. It's limited to defaults / subscriptions, though.
Right, that limitation is essentially what he means.
Like I said in another comment:
>/r/JapanPics hardly cracks 500 points for even the best posts. [But just once we had a post pass 1300 points](https://www.listnook.com/r/japanpics/comments/3vv6rd/tokyos_alleys_by_night_you_can_nearly_smell_the/). Within the sublistnook, that's an outstanding post that everyone loves. But outside of it, it's just another post that can hardly crack the top 100 on /r/all's "hot" list.
Really hoping something that overcomes this obstacle to non-defaults makes it to a working option some day. It'd be great to see smaller communities get a fair bit of attention that isn't inhibited by their lack of subscribers.
1225
PicturElementsJun 16, 2016
+506
Top comment:
>This is what I came to this sub for
This is exactly why sorting by outstanding is an outstanding idea.
506
I_AM_STILL_A_IDIOTJun 16, 2016
+114
Absolutely. As someone who loves to dabble in growing sublistnooks from dormant shells to active communities, seeing people reaffirm your faith in a sublistnook like that is gold.
Just wish more people could get the chance to actually see such posts - they're often pushed down by oft-mediocre default content. Nevertheless, we sometimes get comments like "Wow, I'm glad I found out about this sublistnook" or "I didn't even know this place existed". Bitter sweet!
114
shuhweetJun 16, 2016
+17
This is going to open a can of worms though. When "outstanding" posts occur on some of the morbid sublistnooks that most people would rather not see or even read the headline for that matter. I could see r/outstanding being riddled with nasty surprises.
17
raukolithJun 16, 2016
+66
on the other hand, do you really appreciate tourists coming in and changing a sublistnooks culture?
66
I_AM_STILL_A_IDIOTJun 16, 2016
+121
Effective moderation can prevent that easily.
... wait, is that a reference to Japan fearing that tourists will change the nation's culture?
121
raukolithJun 16, 2016
+40
nah T O U R I S M is kind of a meme on /r/metal right now. when a smaller sub like metal is linked to by a bigger one like music or asklistnook, they can dominate the conversation or polls because there are just so many more than the regulars
40
goatsareeverywhereJun 16, 2016
+9
That's... basically brigading which is supposed to be against the rules but almost never enforced.
When a brigade arrives, regardless of whether it has good or bad intentions, the posting quality takes a tremendous nosedive.
9
PhAnToM444Jun 16, 2016
+15
The thing about this is, for a very specific small sub like /r/japanpics, there isn't enough draw to keep people who aren't really interested there. If that sub gets to the front page, some people will just visit and comment on that post and move on. But some people will be like "holy shit I love looking at pictures of Japan. Theres a sub for that?" and they stay. But that's good, you've brought in more enthusiasts.
Nobody who isn't really into Japan pics is going to stick around there for shits and giggles.
15
MeltedTwixJun 16, 2016
+323
Do you normalize based off the origin of the upvotes?
e.g., "Donald is teh best" post gets 100% upvotes from /r/thedonald but 12% upvotes from *not* /r/thedonald (anyone browsing /r/all)
It seems that if you want the front page to be both Dynamic and a representation of "What's Happening" as a whole, the system should basically look at it like this:
* Post is created in sublistnook
* sublistnook votes on post
* listnook algorithm tests its hotness by normalizing scores
* post is put on /r/all
* /r/all votes on post, while sublistnook continues to vote
* listnook algorithm tests its hotness by normalizing scores in relation to /r/all specifically
* listnook algorithm then compares the discrepancy between /r/all votes and sublistnook votes against all other present sublistnook/all, then alters hotness accordingly
So if /r/thedonald gives 100% upvotes but /r/all gives 12%, it would then compare this with the fact that the /r/pics posts have an average of 70%/50% ratio. This would tell the algorithm that the /r/thedonald post is actually really niche and failed in /r/all while the /r/pics was actually something that the public wanted.
323
iEATu23Jun 16, 2016
+19
This is smart. I don't like how the new algorithm won't show the whole of listnook. Others want more unique sublistnooks to pop up. This gives power back to the entirety of listnook, which is how /r/all should be. In fact, your plan would work even better than usual.
*edit:* tbh, /all doesn't need to change that much. It needs a new category. Listnook should work on improving the sublistnook discovery, and the new algorithm ties in with that. For one, I like how when you go on /new, from your front page, it shows suggested multilistnooks (your own). I like how multiple site features integrate in that way.
In the first place, according to spez, /r/the_donald has recently been downvoted out of /r/all, before the algorithm change. Why did /r/all users change their opinion of /r/the_donald so quickly for it to be removed from the rankings, *before* the new algorithm was implemented?
It's been upvoted to /r/all for so long, and now it's not. I'm going to assume this was happened because /r/the_donald users weren't awake; in which case, it should not be important enough to mention .The sublistnook was beneficial to most users the day of Orlando, but now somehow it's hated by the next day.
Well, before the algorithm was changed. And then oddly enough /r/EnoughTrumpSpam was hit hard by the algorithm.
It's curious to see the purpose of this algorithm change because the idea you support works similarly to how /r/all has always worked, except more effectively.
19
MeltedTwixJun 16, 2016
+15
*note: you would probably need to check subscriptions rather than just current location, at least for non-default subs, to prevent gaming the system*
15
YouveBeenOneUppedJun 16, 2016
+79
Hey Spez, I'm sure you're way ahead of this, but when you weigh only by historic average upvotes, you're opening the window for gaming.
"Why don't we just submit to r/tinysublistnook and then upvote it to the frontpage? since we can game it with fewer accounts? We'll pick r/othertinysublistnook next week"
It's not democratic, and probably pretty "unlistnook" but weighting age of account that upvotes, breadth of different sublistnooks the upvoter is involved in, timing/spacing between upvotes that follow robot patterns, and speed of upvote value decay according to the upvoter profile and such could go a ways to fix potential marketers, etc.
Ex: upvoter was new account, only upvoting in this group, no submissions, always votes within X seconds of Y account with similar pattern, so decay rate of upvote is set to decimal multiplier of other upvote decay rates.
Maybe there's argument that this further democratizes the upvote focusing on the "value of attention" versus the quantity. Or maybe that would just be introducing a literal 3/5th vote? hahahaeughhhhh.
2 cents. :)
79
donuts42Jun 16, 2016
+11
That's probably the 'evil' that they are referring to.
Actually a good way of getting around this is to just look at the activity of a sublistnook over the past month to see if posts are outstanding, and so the sub must have existed for a month. It would be pretty obvious to spot groups of people hopping to a new sub each month.
11
I_AM_STILL_A_IDIOTJun 16, 2016
+8
What you're describing is already defined under vote manipulation. /r/CenturyClub got into hot water for trying something similar a few years ago. If it were to happen, people would be getting [shadow]banned.
8
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+134
Right, /u/spez, but what about a front page that uses karmanaut's idea—high scores *against the mean of each specific sublistnook*—but uses all sublistnooks, even the ones I'm not subscribed to.
That's the difference. /r/all is the highest score of all sublistnooks. My homepage is the highest score against the mean of ones I subscribe to. I'd appreciate a sublistnook that was the highest score against the mean of all sublistnooks, which doesn't currently exist.
134
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+11
That's exactly what the commenter was talking about and what we want, /u/spez wants the front-page to work this way. We want an entirely new /r/all for the purpose of discovering this material that exceeds expectations.
I will note the obvious nobody has said yet that we need to figure out a way so the subs just starting or with like 5 members can't dominate though. I suggest a requirement for sub activity+time it's been active before inclusion into this new thingy we're proposing. Or maybe just a subscriber minimum requirement as a simpler alternative.
11
unverified_userJun 16, 2016
+65
I feel like you'd see a lot of small subs upvote whatever message they want on the front page. Like /r/stamps would have a post that says,
>Stamps rule! Upvote this to /r/all so that everyone can see how awesome stamps are!
65
sveitthroneJun 16, 2016
+16
So, assigning a handicap to sublistnooks to enable greater post visibility? On one hand, that's exciting. I sometimes see subs I subscribe to buried on my own frontpage because they're smaller communities.
On the other hand, some subs prefer to remain smaller communities. Would you consider adding an opt-in option for subs that want to stay that way?
16
spacemosesJun 16, 2016
+25
/r/Busy would be another one you could have. Posts that have a high amount of comments and views, regardless of upvotes and downvotes.
25
ArchangelleAnnRomneyJun 16, 2016
+2919
Any news about plans to get rid of the concept of default subs?
It seems they cause numerous problems, and you mentioned in your last announcement about /r/news that you weren't a fan of them either.
2919
spezJun 16, 2016
+1918
No news to share, but it's very much on my mind. I'd really like communities to come and go organically. Right now, we (Listnook Inc), do the choosing, and I don't like playing kingmaker.
We have communities that come and go quickly (around major world events); rise and fall over the course of months (r/nba, r/gameofthrones); and communities that stay popular for years and years (r/iama, r/AskListnook). We'd like to be able to account for all of these situations.
1918
henx125Jun 16, 2016
+654
Doesn't /r/all effectively do this already? Would it be too crazy to simply remove defaults and rely on /r/all being the new "default"?
654
spezJun 16, 2016
+946
Sort of, but r/all is sorted based on absolute hotness, which means a post in r/funny that has 10k upvotes and 5k downvotes will be ranked higher than a post in r/sewerhorse that has 30 upvotes and no downvotes.
946
NeospectorJun 16, 2016
+658
> r/sewerhorse
I don't know what I'm looking at here, exactly...
Anyway, I like the [tagging system](https://www.listnook.com/r/announcements/comments/4ny59k/lets_talk_about_orlando/d480w3v) that was suggested in the Orlando thread as a replacement for defaults. At sign-up, the site asks questions about your interests and gives you subs that are similarly tagged as options for your front page. Then you can keep the defaults for people who are too lazy or don't care what they look at, while the people who do care get to customize the way they want.
658
TheLamestUsernameJun 16, 2016
+217
i do not know either but that place probably got more visitors just now than it ever has in the past year
217
miiuiiuJun 17, 2016
+57
[Context] (https://www.listnook.com/r/pics/comments/6n9tc/sewer_horse_is_watching_you/c04cfzw?context=3)
The joke was that someone posted the sewer horse picture in /r/pics, and someone else said it belonged in /r/sewerhorse. This was right when custom sublistnooks had come out, so it was some kind of commentary on overspecialization of sublistnooks. This same joke has been made many times since, but sewerhorse was one of the first big instances of deliberately over-specific sublistnook creation.
edit: this was an explanation of the sublistnook's existence. Obviously, sewer horse is just sewer horse and needs no explanation.
57
pilgrimboyJun 16, 2016
+83
There is about 2.25x the amount of people there right now than there are subscribers. Awesome.
83
veggiterJun 16, 2016
+52
Jesus, and it has posts from 8 years ago.
52
conandyJun 16, 2016
+83
[Sewer Horse is watching you.](http://www.imgur.com/ff25TkZ.jpg)
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/sewer-horsebasement-horse
83
yumyum36Jun 16, 2016
+15
No, I really don't want something like this. This is how I leave sites/get confused.
If I choose "Hey, I like videogames" but don't check off the box for news, when a bunch of posts in my section reference the news, or I somehow in the other way feel I miss something by not subscribing to news, so I end up checking off "I want everything" or "I want nothing" and having a miserable experience on either end of the spectrum.
15
TasadarJun 16, 2016
+106
I think getting rid of defaults and using a system that encourages adding (or even prioritizing) and blocking sublistnooks would help new users tailor their experience. /r/all is sort of garbage (though I visit it occasionally), but getting people to set up a listnook with what they like is tricky, so if you could get them to gradually remove/add sublistnooks as they go that'd be a better way to get people what they want.
Like maybe **make upvoting a post from a sublistnook give that sublistnook a higher rating for the user**. Store it on their user page, the more things they upvote/downvote the less they see them. If I think /r/funny is garbage I will start to see it less and less as I downvote it, and if I really like /r/earthporn I'll get more of that as I upvote their most outstanding posts. Then if someone wants to set up their listnook you have a whole list of sublistnooks that they are already prioritizing, plus related sublistnooks to recommend.
106
SomeRandomMaxJun 16, 2016
+69
> Like maybe make upvoting a post from a sublistnook give that sublistnook a higher rating for the user. Store it on their user page, the more things they upvote/downvote the less they see them. If I think /r/funny is garbage I will start to see it less and less as I downvote it, and if I really like /r/earthporn I'll get more of that as I upvote their most outstanding posts. Then if someone wants to set up their listnook you have a whole list of sublistnooks that they are already prioritizing, plus related sublistnooks to recommend.
That actually would be very bad. Particularly the "downvote means I don't like this sub" idea. That basically means users could easily sabotage a sub by just posting a bunch of shit. Good users would downvote, then would gradually be shown the sub less frequently as a result.
Edit: The only possible way to make this work without unintended side-effects would to to literally add upvotes & downvotes for the sub itself, not just posts on that sub.
69
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+193
That and, while I like browsing /r/all, the p*** is annoying. Can disable NSFW ofc, but some sublistnooks are NSFW without being p***. Using RES to filter them out is like playing whack-a-mole.
Can't there just be a p*** tag alongside NSFW?
193
TiekylJun 16, 2016
+85
Holy c*** do I agree. I'm glad that a post of some chick on ~~/r/burstypetite~~ BUSTYPETITE is going so well, but..having half /r/all full of naked chicks is getting frustrating.
85
[deleted]Jun 17, 2016
+25
I've used RES to filter every single p***-related sublistnook that's shown up on the first 10 pages or so of /r/all since last year. I just added /r/bonermaterial this morning. It's kind of ridiculous. I don't even mind p***, and I'm glad people who are attracted to women have a place to go for that, but as a straight woman on listnook, having to scroll past a ton of these daily is just... incredibly alienating. My filter list is up to over 100 subs now:
asianhotties
petitegonewild
realgirls
nsfw_gif
gonewildcurvy
blowjobs
nsfw
m***
tinytits
asstastic
altgonewild
girlsinyogapants
asiansgonewild
thick
datgap
rearpussy
gonewildsmiles
prettygirls
60fpsporn
ass
onoff
porninfifteenseconds
rule34
watchitfortheplot
palegirls
cosplaygirls
redheads
boobies
nsfwfunny
tittydrop
legalteens
cumsluts
gonemild
celebnsfw
randomsexiness
girlsfinishingthejob
hotchickswithtattoos
wtsstadamit
dirtysmall
girlswithglasses
curvy
shorthairedhotties
tightdresses
stacked
kateupton
jewdank
hugeboobs
lipsthatgrip
straightgirlsplaying
pawg
gwcouples
bigboobsgonewild
funsized
nsfwhardcore
burstingout
bigboobsgw
happyembarrassedgirls
gwcumsluts
suctiondildos
sexyfrex
p****
nsfwcosplay
ginger
fitgirls
workgonewild
gonewildcolor
hardbodies
cutemodeslutmode
gettingherselfoff
d*********
simps
hugedicktinychick
bigasses
suicidegirls
volleyballgirls
a***
juicyasians
innie
wifesharing
realasians
freeuse
arielwinter
jigglefuck
amateurarchives
wouldyoufuckmywife
hotwife
festivalsluts
upskirt
gwnerdy
grool
voluptuous
treesgonewild
nsfw_html5
o_faces
homegrowntits
pantsu
adorableporn
creampies
exxxtras
hot_women_gifs
collared
analgw
bonermaterial
25
TheWyoJun 16, 2016
+20
Seriously. I used to only have one or two sublistnooks filtered, but over the past few months my RES filter list has just become a massive list of p*** subs. Like, where the hell have they all come from suddenly compared to in the past?
20
dredmorbiusJun 16, 2016
+7
Doing a very hard rethink of what moderation is and how it should be interpreted is something Listnook should consider.
A popularity contest will always be ... a popularity contest. Aiming for _quality_ is rather more complicated, and simple summed upvotes doesn't get you there.
Upvotes/views, vote ratio/votes (that is, +/- over total)), expert judgement (on posts in which truth value matters), net discussion quality, etc., etc., all come into play.
Another issue (and one in this thread itself) is _comment discoverability_. The ability to no only _sort_ but _filter_ to specific comments of interest ... would be handy. I'm reading on Android/Firefox with desktop Web view right now -- that beats either of the Mobile (i.listnook.com or m.listnook.com) options. But RES isn't available. And do I _ever_ miss being able to collapse all child posts.
Even _that_ isn't helpful for finding really standout comments buried a level or two deep.
7
2scaredJun 16, 2016
+128
> r/sewerhorse
What the f***; how do they have so many submissions?
128
workrakenJun 16, 2016
+153
TIL /r/sewerhorse is a thing. And it is amazing.
153
Magnetic_EelJun 16, 2016
+70
I'm guessing Listnook doesn't want p*** subs to be on the defaults for new users.
70
ZebZJun 16, 2016
+79
So filter NSFW posts for anyone not logged in, and make them opt-in unless subscribed to a particular sub.
79
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+50
[deleted]
50
cyclicampJun 16, 2016
+10
I'd consider this phase one. If this goes well and people like it, I would imagine then they'd switch over to r/all being the default display like you say.
A gradual change is much more likely to work than a sudden one.
10
z500Jun 16, 2016
+24
That's not very gradual for people like me who curate their own front page and never browse r/all.
24
sc4s2cgJun 16, 2016
+17
By frontpage they mean the page you see when logged out, and sublistnooks you see when first signing up.
17
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+113
[deleted]
113
kyewJun 16, 2016
+7
I like it. I could see this working with a system like Netflix's recommendations. For an existing user, make a fingerprint containing all the sublistnooks they subscribe to. Then find users with similar fingerprints. If a sublistnook shows up in a bunch of the similar users' lists, it gets recommended.
To get new users in the mix, do a quick personality survey. Then you can match their personality to existing users who have subscriptions like above.
You could even aggregate the personalities or shared subscriptions of individual sublistnooks' subscribers. Then you can match things by a sublistnook's personality or map how similar two sublistnooks are.
It probably doesn't have to be said, but with Listnookors being the paranoid bunch they are it would definitely be a good idea to let people opt out of the recommendation engine entirely.
7
Master_TallnessJun 16, 2016
+10
I like this idea a lot. Let the user choose what they'd like to start with. One thing, however, is what to show people visiting listnook without an account. I'm fairly certain you get the default sublistnooks on the front page if you haven't registered. So we'd need a way to handle that.
10
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+37
During the /r/news censorship kerfuffle someone (and I forget who, sorry) brought up the idea of replacing default sublistnooks with default multilistnooks, where the multilistnooks are comprised of multiple
"competing" or at least related sublistnooks.
For example, /m/news could include /r/news, /r/worldnews, and /r/politics (and others, I'm sure). /m/funny might include /r/jokes, /r/adviceanimals, /r/badwomensanatomy, /r/shittyaskscience (but certainly not /r/funny). and so on.
You'd still be acting as kingmaker but you'd be able to choose from a lot more options and you could include some UI that explains what the multilistnooks are about and how they can customize their "news" and "funny" feeds, if they want.
37
CarrollQuigleyJun 16, 2016
+1651
/u/spez,
I've said this to you a bunch of times now and I'll say it again:
Any sublistnook that wants to retain default status should be required to enable a public moderation log, with a link to the moderation log available in the sidebar.
1651
cwenhamJun 16, 2016
+54
Adding to what /u/adeadhead said, if we opened up just the ban logs, you could spend 2-3 hours a day, every day, just auditing nothing more than spam account farmers. The noise from that group alone will make it difficult for public defenders to keep abreast of any mod abuse, so if listnook can solve this problem (and for the love of god, /u/spez, PLEASE solve this problem!) then it may be more practical for both sides.
If we opened up the post removal logs on /r/pics, you could spend another hour or two per day just on auditing the removal of screenshots, memes, and advice animals. In fact, you could get a taste of that bit just by clicking on my username.
54
socsaJun 16, 2016
+17
Unfortunately, this would make it very easy for spammers to manipulate certain kinds of subs if the domain auto-sorting list became public. Right now, basically the only way to fight spammers is to have automod sort their submissions by domain, for manual approval. However, when spammers catch wind that this has happened, they will just create a bunch of landing pages on different domains which redirect to the blocked domain. If mod logs were entirely public, it would be trivial to automate this process faster than mods can do anything about it. Likewise, if trolls can see things like what regex we are using to kill Star Wars spoilers, it would completely undo any effort we've put into protecting users from that sort of thing.
That said, some additional transparency would be appreciated, but there needs to be a compromise here. Even just making the user-oriented mod log public would make it easy for trolls to skirt automod bans, and we'd get 100 users a day asking why their low-effort meme comments are getting auto-hidden. It's a double edged sword, but I've been doing this long enough to know that for many subs, having a 100% public mod log would only speed up regression to the lowest common denominator.
17
Dont_Call_it_DirtJun 16, 2016
+395
This is a great idea. Hard to argue against transparency.
395
adeadheadJun 16, 2016
+569
Hi! I'm a mod of /r/pics. We post a report of our moderation statistics monthly. Right now we're hovering around 1300 bans per month, and 50 unbans per month. Since nothing's changed recently, the difference is the number of just straight up spammers and automated karma farming accounts that *aren't* being caught by automoderator. Public stats would make it a simple afternoon's task to reverse engineer the entire spam filtering system and fill comments back up with links to s*** singles near you and shock gore.
Edit: Here's a great post explaining what needs to happen before it could work. With anonymity and automod configuration addressed, I'd be fully behind it for the subs I moderate.
https://www.listnook.com/r/hub/comments/31jj66/weve_taken_the_plunge_to_make_our_mod_log_public/cq2fx2v
Cc: /u/CarrollQuigley
Bonus reading material:
https://www.listnook.com/r/quityourbullshit/comments/3jss04/meta_spammers_how_they_work_and_how_to_spot_them/
https://www.listnook.com/r/DefaultTalk/comments/44ieau/the_negative_effects_of_the_response_to_the_spam/
569
asstasticbumJun 16, 2016
+148
And not have mods to tell you to kill yourself when they are in a bad mood.
148
016BrambleJun 16, 2016
+21
Lots of other websites start off with you having no subscriptions (or follows or whatever their equivalent is) and have a list of recommended ones for different interests such as "television," "sports," "discussion," etc. I think having a new user page like that for listnook would be a better alternative to defaults.
21
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+21
Can we get an actual answer to whether or not anything is going to be done about /r/news? The mods there don't seem to be doing their jobs respectively and that answer you gave seemed more like a cop out than an actual response.
21
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+41
Yes! [There's been discussion about this for over 11 months!](https://www.listnook.com/r/ideasfortheadmins/comments/3cvv7a/change_the_default_sublistnooks/cszwj6d) It would be great to implement things like this, and for now, just having a rotating s*** of defaults would be a huge improvement over keeping the same 50 we've had for *years.*
/r/ListOfSublistnooks was trending yesterday for this reason. People are looking for alternatives to these sublistnooks, where they can experience other communities and other parts of listnook!
Please do keep this problem in mind!
41
kerovonJun 16, 2016
+13
I suspect they will do something like having new users select interests when they sign up, and then it gives you options to choose from. Though I do expect them to retain something like defaults to show to users who are logged out.
13
The_New_FMJun 16, 2016
+6
I made a comment a long time ago addressing this issue:
"I really wish Listnook had some sort of quick customization button when you sign up. The biggest complaint I hear from people about Listnook is how the front page is all over the place and are turned off by it. And this is coming from late 20s, early 30-year olds who are very savvy with technology.
Listnook needs to understand that there are older folks that WANT to absorb the news and knowledge from a reliable and trust-worthy site. However, it's difficult for them because all they see are pictures of seductive goats and a shower thought concerning The Rock, and they have NO IDEA how they can get rid of it. The best recent move Listnook made was removing AdviceAnimals from default. And before someone chimes in, if I told someone "Read the FAQ", I think I would get punched in the face.
The Listnook mods need to step into everybody's shoes and understand that people's exposure to computers/technology is widely varied. They need to make ease & accessibility to the site as simple as possible without losing the charm. Something to the effect of this customization would be nice:
* All-inclusive (default subscriptions as it is now)
* Math, Science, & Technology (dataisbeautiful, technology, futurology, science, etc.)
* Politics (news, politics, worldnews)
* Personal interests (books, movies, music, television, sports)
* Entertainment (funny, pics, videos, EarthPorn, etc.)
Or maybe a Knowledge-based Listnook vs. Entertainment-based Listnook customization."
6
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+207
/r/TwoXChromosomes went down the drain when it became default. Now it's just full of vile arguments in each comment section.
207
SutitanJun 16, 2016
+23
Maybe unpopular opinion due to the positive nature of the sublistnook, but I think /r/earthporn has suffered alot too. Used to be a place filled with genuinely great nature pictures. Now it's a bunch of people taking mediocre cellphone photos and turning up the saturation to 11.
23
ArchangelleAnnRomneyJun 16, 2016
+106
There's been a lot of debate about the problems it causes on /r/fitness too. I don't think anyone's been happy with the way defaults work, and I think /u/spez is right that it needs to change.
106
MockDeathJun 16, 2016
+570
Having a filter for nsfw for all or a separate /r/all would be nice.
Many of us slack at work and brows listnook, at least speaking for myself it would be nice if there was less to no NSFW on a version of /r/all.
-edit- I appreciate the advice, I actually use RES everywhere but work. but I do browse listnook at lunch and breaks.. and occasionally not lunch and breaks. But if you are the frontpage of the internet, new users will not know how to filter things.
570
EunoicJun 16, 2016
+15
Or maybe make a separate NSFW /r/all. I mean there is already a nsfw random sublistnook filter, it seems that having a p*** /r/all would be a good next step. A lot of people who use listnook use it simply to jack off, and appealing to this audience would possibly be a good thing to expand listnook's userbase even more.
15
Le_9k_RedditorJun 16, 2016
+3
[Here you go.](http://listnookp.com/r/nsfw+gonewild+boobies+legalteens+realgirls+ass+amateur+ginger+nsfw2+voluptuous+m***+celebs+redheads+girlswithglasses+collegesluts+blowjobs+thick+hardbodies+passionx+bondage+womenofcolor+scenegirls+girlskissing+upskirt+dirtysmall+girlsinyogapants+hotchickswithtattoos+nsfw_wallpapers+hugeboobs+nipples+asianhotties+o_faces+beach+snowgirls+gloryhole+highheels+cumshot+thighhighs+volleyballgirls+asslick+blondes+beefflaps+pigtails+latinas+pinkshoes+tanlines+brickhouse+panties+gothsluts+pornstars+smokin+buttsex+cleavage+mandingo+cumfetish+models+pics_nsfw+analporn+datass+ass_cleavage+bikinibridge+girlsflashing+orgasms+nsfwoutfits+lingerie+PetiteGoneWild+funsized+xsmallgirls+GWNerdy+darkangels+jilling+rule34+asstastic+facedownassup+BubbleButts+videogamebabes+videogamebabes+nsfw_gifs+adultgifs+XXX_Animated_Gifs+AsianHottiesGIFS+Hot_Women_Gifs+cumsluts+GirlsFinishingTheJob+serafuku+Annoyedtobenude+braceface+cfnf+chixxx_gifs+ecchi+femalepov+forcedorgasms+gingerpuss+girlsplayingsports+fuxtaposition+HappyEmbarrassedGirls+h*****+hentai_gif+PublicFlashing+shewantstofuck+StealthVibes+TinyTits+Unashamed+yuri+sukebei+Bottomless_Vixens+boyshorts+camwhores+CollegeAmateurs+creampies+datgap+datgrip+FestivalSluts+Fingering+FTVgirls+happygaps+LaundryDay+LipsThatGrip+NotSafeForNature+NSFW_nospam+pokies+primes+p****+realbikinis+skinnytail+skivvies+TightShorts+treatemright+undies+WtSSTaDaMiT+xart+YogaPants+AmateurArchives+a***+a******+boltedontits+burstingout+t***+bustypetite+celebnsfw+changingrooms+gwcouples+iwanttofuckher+lesbians+nobsnsfw+onoff+p***+randomsexiness+fuckyeahsexyteens+JiggleFuck+AsiansGoneWild+holdthemoan+WatchItForThePlot+CandidFashionPolice+GoneMild+tightdresses+BigBoobsGW+workgonewild+fitgirls+altgonewild+porninfifteenseconds+60fpsporn+wifesharing+nsfwhardcore+Tgirls+palegirls+TittyDrop+juicyasians+pantsu+suicidegirls+kpopfap+lesbian_pov+MoxiiAndFriends+SoFuckable+Cumonin+trashyboners+slutsbedrunk+russiangirls+SexiestPetites+snapchat_sluts+cosplaygirls+CosplayBoobs+SocialMediaSluts+sheerpanties)
3
spezJun 16, 2016
+796
Agreed.
> Many of us slack at work and browse listnook
At least I can claim it's work.
796
bob1689321Jun 16, 2016
+282
My friend wants to know if you guys have any plans of making an NSFW-only version of /r/all?
282
Bic_ParkerJun 16, 2016
+62
My friend wants to know why /r/nsfwall was banned ~~I~~ he wants to know what isn't safe for walls.
62
ThogOfWarJun 16, 2016
+1359
Hey /u/spez, how do you feel about the new "Stickied Posts" being used only for announcement texts, disrupting services in sublistnooks like /r/ScenesFromAHat where they can no longer post their Scenes Of The Week properly?
I, for one, am sad :(
1359
geek_loserJun 16, 2016
+495
Regardless about how you feel about /r/the_Donald this should really piss people off more. So many subs used this feature to show of content from its users. It's almost useless now.
495
Angry_GnomeJun 16, 2016
+197
My sub posted a weekly Devblog for the game Rust and now we cannot anymore. This change was horrible and the admins should not have punished all of listnook because they were upset with one sublistnooks actions.
197
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+110
[deleted]
110
spezJun 16, 2016
+654
Thanks for the feedback. We're still thinking about stickies, and will likely make more changes. In the meantime, sorry we upset your usage of it.
654
baked_hamJun 16, 2016
+754
I agree with /u/thogofwar, the lack of stickies will really hurt sports themed sublistnooks. They usually sticky game day threads, making them easier to find without having to wade through all the garbage twitter stat-experts' posts
754
spezJun 16, 2016
+435
Game day threads should still work if they are self posts, which most are, by the way.
435
1millionbucksJun 16, 2016
+324
Can the listnook admins really conceive of no scenario in which it would be beneficial to have a link sticky instead of a text post? Some sublistnooks are communities that formed from other sites on the internet, such as online games and commercial websites. What if a sublistnook devoted to a youtuber wanted to sticky his latest video? Suppose a shopping sublistnook wanted to sticky a post with Black Friday deals? Limiting stickies to the self-post only format simply because of one sublistnook's abuse of the feature is ridiculous and totally unfair.
324
belisauriusJun 16, 2016
+83
Actually, the problem is that while the vast and overwhelming majority use listnook's features in a responsible manner some do not. The problem with the sticky system prior to this change was that it allowed sublistnooks to game the voting system by rapidly switching out and mass upvoting user-submitted posts of all kinds. So while the system was used responsibly by nearly everyone, it truly is the ones who abused the system that ruined it for the rest of us.
I hope the admins come up with a way to allow the same, older functionality, without allowed the same time of vote manipulation. But in the end, this is definitely a case of the few ruining it for the many.
83
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+20
[deleted]
20
belisauriusJun 16, 2016
+6
I like your solution and I think it's a lot more elegant than the one they chose. The only issue I see with it is this: we already have a problem where stickied posts don't get upvoted in the vast majority of sublistnooks. As such, when they're unstickied, they just disappear completely. Making it so that stickied posts can't be voted on would exacerbate this problem. I'm not sure having them stick around, post-sticky but without upvotes is a good idea either since what's the difference between a stickied post and a just-stickied but not votable post? It's really a complicated problem and the admins went with their preference, presumably based on more site experience than you or I have.
6
codeverityJun 16, 2016
+25
It's not that they can't conceive of it, it's that certain subs were using memes and mass upvotes to spam the hell out of /r/all. Personally, I think the solution might be to just stop stickies hitting /r/all at all, then subs could at least use them the way they want.
25
geo1088Jun 20, 2016
+22
So when can we expect these more changes?
The sticky changes are just bad. The new requirements are still breaking mod workflows, even though it's been said before that good mod tools should be the priority. You're just taking us backward here.
The announcement post for the new stickies seems to have the lowest upvote/downvote ration since the new search page came out, and if you [look at the "new" sort in the comments](https://www.listnook.com/r/changelog/comments/4ny8y6/renaming_sticky_posts_to_announcements/?sort=new), you'll find *tons* of moderators complaining about it. The restrictions aren't changes anyone wanted, because they're limiting people's ability to moderate. Some sublistnooks have even had to tell users to post news as text posts, so the mods can get around these changes.
The changes made just seem so poorly thought out. I'm still not sure what you and the team were trying to accomplish by them, but I can tell you that the moderators who have to live with it are *not* happy. Something has to be changed here.
22
chicklepipJun 16, 2016
+43
Regarding the sticky situation:
Why not make two separate categories of posts: stickies, and announcements.
Any post, by any user, can be made into stickies. They can be text posts, links, pictures, or whatever. They will be stickied to the top of a sublistnook, but will not show up in /r/all.
Announcements can only be made by moderators, and can only be text posts. These can show up in /r/all.
This way, sports threads, breaking news, etc. threads can make it to /r/all, where they rightfully should be (as announcements), and communities can still make use of stickies, sans the /r/all abuse we've seen in the past with sublistnooks like /r/the_donald.
What do you think?
43
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+76
[deleted]
76
bwaredapenguinJun 16, 2016
+39
>Why did you not make a distinction between stickies and announcements? On a sublistnook I moderate we sticky discussion threads made by users in order to promote more activity on them.
You answered your own question. Trying to promote individual users' threads is not what stickies are meant for, the admins realized this was creating problems so they changed it.
[Here's the official post](https://www.listnook.com/r/changelog/comments/4ny8y6/renaming_sticky_posts_to_announcements/) explaining the change.
39
dietotakuJun 16, 2016
+10
I read the original post, but it seems to me that regardless of what they *intended,* this is something communities have found a use/need for. If they want to distinguish between mod-generated announcements and user posts being promoted for the community's benefit, they need to implement 2 different types of stickies, not just replace one with the other.
10
johnmal85Jun 16, 2016
+59
Can stickies be exclusive from Upvotes or something to keep them active as they are?
59
H_L_MenckenJun 16, 2016
+8
I still have no idea how the switch from stickies to announcements has anything to do with the problem is was supposedly trying to remedy? Can anybody explain this to me?
8
codeverityJun 16, 2016
+14
the_donald was stickying a lot of posts instantly, and the community was upvoting them almost as soon as they were posted - the combination leading to a lot of spam on /r/all. They changed stickies so that they can only be made by mods and also can only be text posts. The post touching on it is [here](https://www.listnook.com/r/announcements/comments/4ny59k/lets_talk_about_orlando/)
14
marcus_enbJun 16, 2016
+12
I recently began using a sublistnook as an alternative to youtube comments on my (400k+ subscriber) channel. With Alientube, Listnook seemed like (and is) a really good alternative for discussion that allows for some moderation... which was impossible on youtube.
I've been using stickies to help people find the newest "official video comment" threads. It was very convenient to be able to just link the video and sticky it. I can kind of get around the limitation by making a self post with a video link in the post, but that really has left me wondering what the point of the limitation is if it is so easily circumvented.
12
raven12456Jun 16, 2016
+254
How will this affect when an event occurs and a sublistnook has a lot of activity? (Ex- /r/Sports or sport specific subs during playoffs/finals, /r/news when something happens before it gets rolled into a megathread, /r/DOTA 2 during The Internationals, etc) Will we be seeing less of those on r/all when that happens?
254
spezJun 16, 2016
+240
You'll see fewer powers from the same community. This is one of those cases where we might be throwing out some of the good with the bad. We'll keep a watch during major events and see how it feels. I don't believe r/all or our current front page is the best solution for Listnook, but it's the best we have right now.
240
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+135
>This is one of those cases where we might be throwing out some of the good with the bad.
i disagree, it sounds like this change will be a perfect solution for sporting events taking over /r/all. If i'm interested in NBA finals or a DOTA tournament, i'll be visiting the respective sublistnook for those sports. If i'm not interested, one or two posts on /r/all is plenty. it's not fun when *anything* takes over /r/all, whether it's a short-lived event or a long-running thing like the elections.
135
AzuredJun 16, 2016
+107
Hi spez. Would you consider providing a sublistnook that does not have the enhanced algorithm applied to it? Some sort of /r/trueall for example.
Overall I prefer the change, but there is a reality that this change will distort. I think it's valuable to be able to see which posts are *actually* the highest voted on listnook even if we don't like the answer.
107
kittenpantzenJun 16, 2016
+39
Try looking at Top for the last hour when looking at All instead of sorting by hotness. It may be what you're looking for.
39
gdshephe88Jun 16, 2016
+215
Do these changes only apply to "HOT"? If we go to /r/all/top, will we still see a "true" listing of what is on top of /r/all today/year/hour/etc?
215
Werner__HerzogJun 16, 2016
+324
> as a community is represented more and more often in the listing, the hotness of its posts will be increasingly lessened
Will this have an effect on the hotness over the period of a day or over a longer period? Because this would not only prevent the_D, but also subs like r/funny, r/gaming and r/adviceanimals from dominating r/all.
324
spezJun 16, 2016
+229
It's just for the specific rendering of the r/all listing. So, it'll affect all communities with r/all itself, but not on the listings for the actual communities. Not sure if I'm answering the question you're asking...
229
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+250
This sounds like a great way for us to encounter sublistnooks in /r/all that we haven't heard of before, rather than seeing the sublistnooks /u/Werner__Herzog mentioned over and over again. This sounds like a fantastic change and a great improvement to the listnook experience.
I think sublistnook discovery and experiencing different communities is paramount to the listnook experience, and the diversity in these communities is what makes listnook special.
250
StarBPJun 16, 2016
+30
To rephrase what I think they are saying, does an increased hotness of a given sublistnook's posts reduce its presence on /r/all for an instant, or a day, or a year, or what? How long of a "memory" does this feature have?
30
lphaasJun 16, 2016
+10
I think the algorithm just serves to keep a constant equilibrium. For instance, if /r/the_donald is dominating in hotness at any given time, then its likeliness to show up on /r/all will decline respectively. This means that there's no time limit to the reduction, it's just a constant balancing mechanism between existing subs. Hopefully that makes sense.
10
GodOfNumbersJun 16, 2016
+44
Am I right in thinking that this will allow smaller sublistnooks to get more attention in r/all?
44
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+23
Probably not *smaller*, but more of the ones like /r/music or /r/television that don't make /r/all as often. It sounds like it'll still take thousands of net upvotes to hit /r/all.
23
impossiblevariationsJun 16, 2016
+334
>would prevent subs like r/funny, r/gaming and r/adviceanimals from dominating r/all.
Good?
334
mcslibbinJun 16, 2016
+150
yeah, I am not really seeing a problem with that at all
150
Nobody_is_on_redditJun 16, 2016
+49
Yeah but how will I see a shitty gif of like 6 GTA helicopters being taken out by a back alley prostitute soaring through the clouds armed only with a butter knife?
49
PortIslandStationJun 16, 2016
+22
Or a nine sentence story on top a meme picture.
22
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+360
[deleted]
360
spezJun 16, 2016
+372
Yes, we'll expose filtering to everyone in the near future.
In your mind, what's the difference between filtering and blocking?
372
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+325
[deleted]
325
zardehJun 16, 2016
+51
You could actually use this as a tool to do a lot of things.
Sub blockages are considered partial downvotes in terms of location on /r/all, meaning that a sub that is blocked by lots of people is less likely to make it to all.
Blockages are used to help decide which subs to quarantine. If 10% of the userbase is blocking something, its probably some form of cancer.
51
chicklepipJun 16, 2016
+28
That's certainly an idea to think about.
One problem I'm thinking about, though, is political sublistnooks. If that last rule of yours were enacted, every political sublistnook would be quarantined, thanks to people on the opposite side of the political spectrum (or even just supporters of different candidates) filtering out certain sublistnooks. /r/the_donald would get Hillary and Bernie's sublistnooks quarantined in a day (and I'm sure the same would happen to /r/the_donald, too.)
Another idea would be that 10% of the userbase filtering a sublistnook would not result in it being quarantined, but would simply result in it being excluded from /r/all. This would be kind of cool, because it'd mean that political sublistnooks would just not be a part of /r/all, making browsing listnook during election years slightly more bearable.
28
Cobra_McJingleballsJun 16, 2016
+9
This is an interesting point.
Using RES to filter out junk need not be a double-edged sword (like it currently is) by removing the filter users from the democratic process of voting/downvoting.
If Listnook instituted their own native block/filter, that should be perceived as a downvote. Indeed you're right: if a large number of people are filtering/blocking something, that's a big indication it shouldn't be on /r/all.
9
omgsoozeJun 16, 2016
+28
Not op, but filtering to me feels like I could remove it from showing up in my feed but I'd still be able to view the sub should I choose to go directly to it via url or links. Blocking to me feels as if I can remove it entirely from my listnook experience (wont show up in feed, can't link to it directly, comments containing links to that sub don't hyperlink, etc).
28
Stalked_Like_CornJun 16, 2016
+43
One thing I'd like to see on /r/all is that our filtered subs not be taken into account for the /r/all page. I have /r/the_donald filtered and on my front page of /r/all was exactly 3 items. They're still numbered like 12. 15. 22. But I'd like to see a top 25 of subs I don't subscribe to without massive gaps of subs I don't want to see.
Also, something I've suggested before and was told "we're looking into doing that" about before was longer mutes on people using modmail. 3 Days, sometimes, is just not enough. We have people who would wait 3 days and message us again and we gotta mute again. Why not let us set a time just like we do on the bans of the sub itself.
*edit*
Thank you for the replies. I get it, RES is doing it, not Listnook. I was confused. Thanks for the replies.
43
DeimorzJun 16, 2016
+13
> One thing I'd like to see on /r/all is that our filtered subs not be taken into account for the /r/all page. I have /r/the_donald filtered and on my front page of /r/all was exactly 3 items. They're still numbered like 12. 15. 22. But I'd like to see a top 25 of subs I don't subscribe to without massive gaps of subs I don't want to see.
That's because you're filtering using RES, which does the filtering *after* the posts have already been sent to your browser. If you use the listnook gold filtering (which, like spez says, we're planning to make available for everyone soon), your pages will still be the full size because the filtering is done server-side before sending to you.
You can do a temporary filter by putting the sublistnooks you don't want to see in the url like this: https://www.listnook.com/r/all-funny-pics-leagueoflegends
Or set up persistent filters through the sidebar at https://www.listnook.com/me/f/all
13
CoolRunnerJun 16, 2016
+13
Filter = doesn't appear in all
Blocking = username mentions also blocked from my inbox. I am harassed constantly by users in /r/wallstreetbets because I disagreed with an awful decision made by a mod. They've set automoderator to tell users to contact me with complaints, which I obviously don't give a shit about. My inbox is bombarded with messages from users in the sub, even after repeated requests to stop doing this.
13
BloombergPresidentJun 16, 2016
+14
You should really report this officially to the admins, it sounds like blatant harassment.
14
CoolRunnerJun 16, 2016
+7
I can't say with 100% certainty, but I think I did about a year ago. It's been going on for about 2 years now. Over time it has definitely slowed down, but there is still a stream of messages I receive from the users of that sublistnook as a result of the AM auto-response.
7
wowy-liedJun 16, 2016
+10
> use RES
This is the only reason why i have res installed.
I have thousands of users (mostly reposters, spammer and bots) and hundreds of sublistnooks filtered. This should be a basic option on listnook.
10
nyjets326Jun 16, 2016
+812
Do you feel that listnookors are increasingly quick to jump to conspiracy theory conclusions when any change is made? Personally I don't support the views of /r/the_donald but why not roll out this change when /r/all was dominated by Bernie Sanders related content? It seems a little opportunist and political to put forth these changes now.
edit: I also don't support /r/SandersForPresident, I'm not sure why but the replies besides /u/spez seem to imply allegiance to one candidate or another, I just wanted to point out that listnook should look at how this type of issue affects the website throughout its history.
812
rigillJun 16, 2016
+1125
Why was there no problem when sanders for president dominated r/all?
1125
SqueagleyJun 16, 2016
+147
You dropped these -> _ _
147
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+165
[deleted]
165
Th4tFuckinGuyJun 16, 2016
+531
/u/Spez, I've been a user for the better part of a decade on a different account, and I think I speak for all of listnook's legacy users and even some of the newer ones when I say it's high time we brought back /r/listnook as a place for meta discussion about the site itself.
ModMail is a cop-out that hides all upper-level discussions from the community, and waiting for /r/announcements to post something relevant to the current issues plaguing this site is only hindering the ability of the community to suggest and promote fixes and upgrades to listnook.
Give us a place to discuss listnook that is free from one-sided political drama, where we can come together and say things like "Hey, Admins, why aren't you banning whichever mod censored the hell out of /r/news" or "Hey Admins, lets change the algorithm for upvotes so places like /r/the_donald can't game the front page of /r/all" or my personal favorite, "Hey Admins, why haven't you implemented a limit on the number of sublistnooks a user can moderate and done what you can to enforce it?"
531
hansjens47Jun 16, 2016
+92
As a user who's been around for a decade, you'll remember why /r/listnook.com was shut down:
It was an absolute shitfest. Listnook just grew too big for such a sub to function. You cannot have a huge uncurated sublistnook. It just doesn't work.
/r/politics self-posts of political soapboxing to a perceived huge/impactful audience, editorialized "story" titles that don't describe content, polls, "upvote if", PSA:, Daily reminder that....", boycot ___ for ___ reason posts: there's a reason all those things were hated so much they're banned from pretty much all communities of size. Without rules that go beyond the scope of the sitewide rules, you cannot have a large community function without rules and removals. It doesn't work.
People who want true, large catch-all sublistnook back forget that listnook is exponentially larger than it was back then. It's not a feasible option. It cannot and will not happen.
92
thimblyjoeJun 16, 2016
+39
>ModMail is a cop-out that hides all upper-level discussions from the community
From the mods perspective, I can see why they'd prefer ModMail. It puts the conversation in a place where it isn't them facing down a mob. Mob mentality can devolve any good conversation into a shouting match just based on the way human behavior works. I think it's better the way it is.
39
Th4tFuckinGuyJun 16, 2016
+7
I don't think ModMail is wrong, I understand the need completely. But for it to be only place where admins are faced with the issues listnook users have with the site without their invitation like this post? That's an issue, I feel. I think the Admins should have to confront sitewide issues and be held to those conversations for longer than a day like we get with /r/announcements.
7
SallazarJun 16, 2016
+5
I'd actually like to see something like a mod arbitration committee, ideally run by non-admins (with some checks and balances for mods to prevent corruption and tampering). And make all their decisions and reasoning made public to anyone who is interested, but to keep the whole ordeal off things like the front page. Maybe an opt in sub that cannot reach /r/all.
Right now mods have too much power and almost no oversight from either their own communities nor the website admins. And I dislike the idea of giving too much power to the admins but damn some mods are petty and shitty.
5
seanmharcailinJun 16, 2016
+246
I think biggest problem I've seen in the last year is that posts aren't MOVING. So when a post gets to the front page... it just stays there for a whole day. In the past, there was a lot more movement so there was naturally more variety. I would like to see posts moving a bit more quickly, and that would probably help with keeping one dominant voice from becoming so overwhelming.
246
SidoneyJun 17, 2016
+102
Yeah, it's c*** now. I sleep for 8 hours while America is awake and come back to a front page which is 2/3 the same as when I went to bed? Not only that but it's still full of posts I saw nearly 24 hours ago.
102
NJNeal17Jun 17, 2016
+12
You kinda *have* to give a post 24 hours so the whole world gets a chance to see what you saw. If something hits the #1 s*** when you're on but falls dramatically by the time that I logon, the community response will be affected.
12
FinalMantasyXJun 16, 2016
+104
Is this going to do anything about the problem of submissions in the first 2 pages (100 submissions per page) being on /r/all for 20 hours at a time? Or more pages, obviously, but it's most obvious on the first two pages that content does NOT cycle as intended.
Because when that started happpening, people got mad, and the admin response was "no changes were made to listnook's algorithm you're just imagining it".
And it's still happening.
And still terrible.
Especially now that we have listnook uploads which aren't marked purple by Listnook Enhancement Suite and so we keep accidentally viewing them over and over and oVER AND OVER AND OVER
**Also, I would love to suggest:** A category tag for sublistnooks. It would be fantastic if I could block or promote specific categories. I want /r/all to show me more gaming content than other content, and no sports content, and no NSFW female content. I would love to be able to do that without having to do [this](http://imgur.com/a/ByOMN).
104
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+5
How about a flying fish algorithm. ( I made this up.) Whatever reaches front page of all gets weighted down more heavily. Like falling through air instead of water. Upvotes are flapping wings to stay aloft, downvotes are gravity. Once anything bubbles up past the threshold, it can fall quicker unless the upvotes keep pouring in. Maybe the gravity kicks in after a set amount of time?
Probably all kinds of reasons this is an awful idea.
Edit: I have been informed that I am probably dumb.
5
HelveticaBOLDJun 16, 2016
+15
Yes, yes, yes. The admins' contention that users are imagining that posts are remaining at the top for too long is insulting to anyone who browses the site for very long.
I used to be able to rely on seeing a significant amount of new content hit my front page every hour or two; now I'm basically done with Listnook for the day once I've seen the first hundred posts or so, and some of those posts will *still* be there the following day.
Admins, this is a problem. Fix it.
15
ostrich_semenJun 16, 2016
+83
Hey Spez,
A year ago, someone posted a proof of concept on /r/netsec about successfully vote brigading using a pretty simple stack. See:
https://np.listnook.com/r/netsec/comments/38wl43/we_used_sock_puppets_in_rnetsec_last_year_and_are/
Is there a way we can provide moderators with more transparent data about vote timing, frequency, account age, and other "vote health" metrics, possibly through a moderator-only API call?
It seems like since vote brigading is becoming a serious issue on Listnook, there should be an effort to increase transparency by providing robust yet anonymized vote health metrics.
83
HalakuJun 16, 2016
+452
>The changes we are making are to preserve this aspect of r/all—our specific goal being to prevent any one community from dominating the listing. The algorithm change is fairly simple—as a community is represented more and more often in the listing, the hotness of its posts will be increasingly lessened. This results in more variety in r/all. Many people will ask if this is related to r/the_donald. The short answer is no, we have been working on this change for a while, but I cannot deny their behavior hastened its deployment.
Thank you for straight-up admitting it. That kind of honesty helps build trust between the users and the admins.
>This undermines Listnook, and we are not going to allow it.
And thank you for **that** as well. I've been having to use my phone to check the site on desktop mode until the App supports filtering with gold, just to make /r/all useable. It'll be nice to use it again without having to worry about being drowned out by all the political shenanigans, regardless of one's particular flavor of choice in that regards.
452
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+87
My content filter has gotten quite a workout over the past couple of months. Should I replace digital filters at the same rate I change my Brita filter?
87
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+54
Did you buy the /r/shittytechsupport extended warranty?
54
whatiseverything1Jun 21, 2016
+6
I really truly and deeply hate the new algorithm changes. So what if things I do not agree with get promoted. As long as each vote is fair and counted equally, this is a good thing. When I viewed /all I got a snapshot of what people were interested in at a particular point in time. Most of these post had large numbers of comments, and were usually fairly interesting.
Now it feels like the posts are more or less appearing randomly. I think I get a better selection of ideas from reading google news. Every other post is a cat image, or some other inconsequential non-sense.
Say what you will about election posts during an election. People upvoting their views is what is supposed to happen. When the election is over people will move on. This is a good thing.
Right now listnook feels stale. I do not feel my votes count for anything so I have more or less stopped voting. I have also more or less stopped reading /all because there is 0 interesting content. The thrill of voting to on an article and seeing hit the front page is also gone.
This site is now boring to me.
6
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+16
[deleted]
16
ThefriendlyfaceplantJun 16, 2016
+59
>ones that attempt to dominate the conversation on Listnook at the expense of everyone else. This undermines Listnook, and we are not going to allow it.
Then there's got to be more fair competition between sublistnooks as well. The /r/news debacle was the result of complacency of mods, complacency that grew because they simply were the first subs to become default and it never changed.
59
TelicAstraeusJun 16, 2016
+8
this. having a name like /r/news pretty much guarantees that they will get most everyone looking for news, especially if they are default, and especially if they have everyone voting there to get stuff to the front page. there is nothing for example that helps /r/neutralnews get seen by the majority versus /r/news.
8
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+43
[deleted]
43
coryluluJun 16, 2016
+12
/u/spez is only talking about /r/all, frontpage works off a totally different algorithm that measures hotness relative to the respective sublistnooks and sort of weaves them into your feed. This kinda change wouldn't work the same way for frontpage, it would need to be totally different... Also, there isn't really much purpose in doing it on frontpage.
It would be nice to have some preference options though for how /r/all is displayed, but there are some philosophical debates as to how that affects the platform as a whole and also might require several API changes to take effect that will need to be integrated into all 3rd party applications as well that use it.
12
honeycaeksJun 16, 2016
+5
I would also like if there was another category with the old algorithm. I prefer to see exactly what people are voting on. It's especially useful if a large event occurs and you can see all the most important threads at the top, it doesn't matter what sublistnook they came from.
If there is another large event, such as the Orlando shooting, but there is only one post about it on /r/all it doesn't really feel like the "front page of the Internet" anymore, does it?
5
s4embakla2ckle1Jun 16, 2016
+45
Honestly, and I say this as one of the thousands who have been banned from the donald by their idiotic mods, I'd much rather we have a discussion about the biased, agenda-driven moderation on your default news sub /r/news, where the mods have routinely blocked discussion around the TPP for over a year now. Why does listnook refuse to do anything about it? I'm much more concerned with the propagandizing mods of r/news than I am with anything the donald is doing.
45
Leo_9Jun 16, 2016
+17
I am probably echoing sentiments from elsewhere in the thread, but;
> ones that attempt to dominate the conversation on Listnook
What, exactly, is the difference between dominating a conversation and using the weight of your sublistnook's popularity to form a majority rule?
If you don't want a sublistnook with a lot of voting power to frequently rise to the top, then why do upvotes exist in the first place?
I have never posted on the_donald, I don't like Trump, and his supporters often shit up the subs I do browse.
That said, even I think this just seems like a case of "democracy, as long as you have the right opinions" - the loudest, most numerous voices naturally dominate any such system and have always dominated Listnook. What is the difference between Bernie's former domination and Trump's current domination? Why is this only necessary now - with hastened deployment, no less?
If the_donald is somehow unnaturally manipulating or gaming the system, attempt to fix that exploit. Don't respond to 'domination' with your own arbitrary heavy-handed domination right back. Again, why is diverse content only endangered now? Trump supporters are not the first political group by far to dominate Listnook - why was this not necessary during Obama's campaign?
Oh, and whilst we're on the subject of vote manipulation, unnaturally gaming the system, and so on; how about we talk about the SRS clique, their demonstrable brigading, and their hostile takeovers of other sublistnooks?
Everything about this seems wrong. This is the opposite of 'authentic'.
17
CasualRamenConsumerJun 16, 2016
+535
I like that there's more NSFW content on my front page now. Finding all sorts of new subs.
535
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+71
Sorry the link is long.
http://listnook.com/r/nsfw+gonewild+boobies+legalteens+realgirls+ass+amateur+ginger+nsfw2+voluptuous+m***+celebs+redheads+girlswithglasses+collegesluts+blowjobs+thick+hardbodies+passionx+bondage+womenofcolor+scenegirls+girlskissing+upskirt+dirtysmall+girlsinyogapants+hotchickswithtattoos+nsfw_wallpapers+hugeboobs+nipples+asianhotties+o_faces+beach+snowgirls+gloryhole+highheels+cumshot+thighhighs+volleyballgirls+asslick+blondes+beefflaps+pigtails+latinas+pinkshoes+tanlines+brickhouse+panties+gothsluts+pornstars+smokin+buttsex+cleavage+mandingo+cumfetish+models+pics_nsfw+analporn+datass+ass_cleavage+bikinibridge+girlsflashing+orgasms+nsfwoutfits+lingerie+PetiteGoneWild+funsized+xsmallgirls+GWNerdy+darkangels+jilling+rule34+asstastic+facedownassup+BubbleButts+videogamebabes+videogamebabes+nsfw_gifs+adultgifs+XXX_Animated_Gifs+AsianHottiesGIFS+Hot_Women_Gifs+cumsluts+GirlsFinishingTheJob+serafuku+Annoyedtobenude+braceface+cfnf+chixxx_gifs+ecchi+femalepov+forcedorgasms+gingerpuss+girlsplayingsports+fuxtaposition+HappyEmbarrassedGirls+h*****+hentai_gif+PublicFlashing+shewantstofuck+StealthVibes+TinyTits+Unashamed+yuri+sukebei+Bottomless_Vixens+boyshorts+camwhores+CollegeAmateurs+creampies+datgap+datgrip+FestivalSluts+Fingering+FTVgirls+happygaps+LaundryDay+LipsThatGrip+NotSafeForNature+NSFW_nospam+pokies+primes+p****+realbikinis+skinnytail+skivvies+TightShorts+treatemright+undies+WtSSTaDaMiT+xart+YogaPants+AmateurArchives+a***+a******+boltedontits+burstingout+t***+bustypetite+celebnsfw+changingrooms+gwcouples+iwanttofuckher+lesbians+nobsnsfw+onoff+p***+randomsexiness+fuckyeahsexyteens+JiggleFuck+AsiansGoneWild+holdthemoan+WatchItForThePlot+CandidFashionPolice+GoneMild+tightdresses+BigBoobsGW+workgonewild+fitgirls+altgonewild+porninfifteenseconds+60fpsporn+wifesharing+nsfwhardcore+Tgirls+palegirls+TittyDrop+juicyasians+pantsu+suicidegirls+kpopfap+lesbian_pov+MoxiiAndFriends+SoFuckable+Cumonin+trashyboners+slutsbedrunk+russiangirls+SexiestPetites+snapchat_sluts+cosplaygirls+CosplayBoobs+SocialMediaSluts+sheerpanties
71
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+150
[deleted]
150
bmocJun 16, 2016
+122
http://listnooklist.com/nsfw
Make an alt, unsubscribe from the defaults. Only sub to the NSFW subs that 'fit'.
Now you have the best p*** site you could hope for at the switch of an account. Works quite well with listnook phone apps that support account switching (like sync).
122
roionsteroidsJun 16, 2016
+49
Or you could always create your own multisublistnook!
Like https://www.listnook.com/user/roionsteroids/m/p*** (you can set it to private of course).
49
FractalPrismJun 16, 2016
+36
Listnook should reboot its Moderation system.
its too easy for people to hold far too many 'mod' powers, with no way to Easily & Quickly boot those people if they are biased or have an agenda.
Many sublistnooks are now worse than worthless, WorldNews used to be great, but subs like it are ruled by 'party' talk and too ripe with brigading and other forms of Censorship.
Mods should not have the power to censor people, unless its a grave issue, like doxxing.
i just come to listnook for links to other places and for the comments.
but if the comments are 'sanitized', there is no real discussion other than the 'approved message'.
this is one of the core incompetancies which makes listnook lose most of its value as Socially Aggregated News Media portal.
You've let it go on like this for years, so its probably pointless to even bother talking about it.
I would propose that any "mod" status should 100% expire after a given time, say...one month.
That way if the person is worth giving that power back to, its an Active choice that the community makes, not some 'squatter seniority'.
36
johndelfinoJun 16, 2016
+14
Hey /u/spez/, any chance of metrics representing number of posts in /r/all prior to the change and after the change for major sublistnooks? It's really hard to wrap your head around a change like this in a vacuum, particularly when you're given qualitative explantation to a quantitative solution.
14
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+335
[deleted]
335
Sw4rmlordJun 16, 2016
+111
This should be higher up. I can't believe I can be banned for reading an article and making a perfectly normal comment in /r/hypotheticalsublistnook and then be banned from 10 other sublistnooks automatically
111
TreacherousBowelsJun 16, 2016
+47
At the very minimum there should be an automated notification when banned. Right now I could be banned from a sub I never even visited, and I could get a Listnook ban if I post in there with another account. I would lose my account for subverting a sub ban I never even knew of. People posting on /r/kotakuinaction get automatically banned by a range of subs, for some reason.
47
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+68
[deleted]
68
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+98
I know it may not be "your place" but I am really concerned with what happened at /r/news. It seems like it has faded into /r/MuseumOfListnook already, but the mod culture is really concerning as a user. The fact that one mod told users to kill themselves (and obliterated a thread about a critical event) and wasn't dealt with until 24 hours later and then made a new account to try and reclaim his position is mind blowing. Are you ok with listnook being represented by people like that? If so why, if not why aren't things changing?
98
GG_HenryJun 16, 2016
+37
Please for the love of God just allow me to block sublistnooks without the use of third party softwaree.
37
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+299
>Many people will ask if this is related to r/the_donald. The short answer is no, we have been working on this change for a while, but I cannot deny their behavior hastened its deployment. We have seen many communities like r/the_donald over the years—ones that attempt to dominate the conversation on Listnook at the expense of everyone else. This undermines Listnook, and we are not going to allow it.
No, it's not related but yes it is.
299
TelicAstraeusJun 16, 2016
+189
I an not a huge fan of /r/the_Donald myself, but it can't be denied that they were one of the few subs able to actually get news not only about the Orlando shooting to the front page, but also the censorship on /r/news.
It seems very strange to me that while a lot of people were upset about this censorship on your selected default, your actions that day were suited only to punish the sublistnook actually helping to get the word out, while doing nothing to address trust and responsibility in defaults or to help ensure timely access to breaking news (apart from vague commentary about using /r/live more after a user suggested it).
It feels disingenuous given the timing to claim the changes you were attempting, including the *very* poorly thought out move to alter sticky posts, were not intended to affect that sublistnook.
You're coming across as not caring what your users care about. which is fine I guess. but you aren't doing yourself favors when it comes to trust in the listnook team.
---
edit: please bring back /r/listnook.com
edit2: or hell, give us official public moderator logs. or encourage big sublistnooks to use /u/publicmodlogs
edit3: you could also do more to promote and organize the usage of multi-listnooks. make them able to be subscribed to and give them a subscriber count, add features to make them feel more like sublistnooks. let them be like mixtapes that eclectic people share, and promote them on the front page like you do trending subs. Here's my latest one for alternative news sublistnooks, for example: https://www.listnook.com/user/TelicAstraeus/m/newsstuff
189
SoundOfDrumsJun 16, 2016
+5
Rather than browsing /all, I would love to have sublistnooks grouped so I can browse a large set, or combination of sets all at once.
For example, if I'm into politics, I add the politics neighborhood, which would include general politics sublistnooks, specific issue sublistnooks, and candidate specific sublistnooks.
If I'm into games, I get specific game sublistnooks and general gaming sublistnooks.
One big benefit is that you'll get more exposure to other sublistnooks that you may not normally see, and you won't get totally irrelevant topics to your interests. Such as the bazillion p*** sublistnooks.
This would be a great substitute for /all that's between all and regular subscriptions.
5
Ob101010Jun 16, 2016
+96
> Interestingly enough, r/the_donald was already getting downvoted out of r/all yesterday morning before we made any changes. It seems the rest of the Listnook community had had enough.
What are your tools for detecting
real voting
bot voting
vote brigading
and other vote manipulation?
If you have these tools, are they open source?
96
adeadheadJun 16, 2016
+359
This explains why brand new sublistnooks flooded the front page. I adore the new /r/all. A post from /r/dndgreentext even made the cut. Great work.
359
adeadheadJun 16, 2016
+25
How will this affect the ability of breaking news stories to stay atop the front page? That's a not all together insignificant part of listnook's appeal, the ability to keep relevant news in the spotlight while things unfold.
Could you at least add Listnook stickied live threads to /r/all?
25
postukJun 16, 2016
+39
Hi /u/Spez
Why don't we instead have a 'townhall' about the broken moderator structure that has brought great shame on this previously-fantastic community?
Far too few individuals weird far too great influence and power on Listnook, as was illustrated by the recent behaviour of the /r/news Mods, which has brought great shame on your organisation.
Please please fix this NOW. It will very soon by too late.
Kindest regards,
/u/Postuk
39
Firecracker048Jun 16, 2016
+90
I have to ask spez. Why did /r/the_donald hasten this process, but other subs like fat people hate(yes I know they were banned) and sanders for president not hasten this?
90
[deleted]Jun 16, 2016
+228
[deleted]
228
bilabrinJun 16, 2016
+67
Agreed.
[This comment](https://www.listnook.com/r/announcements/comments/4ny59k/lets_talk_about_orlando/d480end) specifically really touched me and I felt it should have merited a response.
198 Comments