· 49 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 23, 2026 at 7:29 PM

Lisa Kudrow: ‘Friends is still great. Matthew Perry was a genius’

Posted by TimesandSundayTimes


Lisa Kudrow: ‘Friends is still great. Matthew Perry was a genius’
www.thetimes.com
Lisa Kudrow: ‘Friends is still great. Matthew Perry was a genius’
It’s 22 years since it ended but Friends earns Lisa Kudrow £15 million a year. She reveals what went on behind the scenes — and why The Comeback was cancelled

🚩 Report this post

49 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
TimesandSundayTimes 2 days ago +19
# It’s 22 years since it ended but Friends still earns Lisa Kudrow £15 million a year. The actress reveals what went on behind the scenes — and why her own hit show was cancelled twice Everyone knows the US sitcom *Friends* is more popular now than it has ever been. The show ended in 2004 but it’s still one of the most watched series in the UK. The five surviving cast members — Jennifer Aniston, Courteney Cox, Lisa Kudrow, David Schwimmer and Matt LeBlanc (Matthew Perry, aka Chandler, died in 2023) — each earn $20 million (£15 million) a year from repeat fees. Why? “Because Phoebe Buffay was so great?” Lisa Kudrow speculates with a twinkle. And sure, Kudrow’s unforgettable guitar-playing ditz singing her song *Your Love* (“Your love is like a giant pigeon crapping on my heart”) was a big part of it. But there was something else. “After Matthew died I watched the show again,” Kudrow says, more serious now. “Before, I only saw what I did wrong or could have done better. But for the first time I truly appreciated just how great it was. I felt I did OK, but Jennifer and Courteney? Amazing. David and Matt? They had me laughing so hard. And then Matthew — he was just beyond us all.” Even that’s not the full story. Gen Zers born after *Friends* ended love the show maybe because the story of six youngsters living pre-social media lives has a prelapsarian innocence. At their Central Perk hangout, no one has laptops or smartphones; they chill on the sofa actually talking, flirting, having fun. Sure the internet existed, but it was still new enough for Chandler to get freaked out by a message from a “cyber chick”. “Yes,” Kudrow says. “*Friends* captured a kind of innocence that maybe a younger generation has never got to experience.” But was it really that innocent? “Oh no, there was definitely mean stuff going on behind the scenes,” Kudrow says. Famously, the cast were all friends in real life. At the start they were each paid $22,500 an episode, but instead of competing they negotiated as a team to secure $1 million an episode by the end. Kudrow, educated at the elite Vassar College in Poughkeepsie, upstate New York, reportedly took a lead in the discussions. As a result she, Aniston and Cox became the highest-paid television actresses in the world at the time. But Kudrow, 62, is talking about the show’s writers’ room on the Warner Brothers lot in Burbank, California, where the show was filmed. She says it contained 12-15 staff, mostly men, some of whose gags have made it into the culture (“Oh. My. God” as an expression of melodramatic outrage and, “We were on a break,” as an excuse for philandering originated in that room). And yet … “Don’t forget we were recording in front of a live audience of 400, and if you messed up one of these writers’ lines or it didn’t get the perfect response they could be like, ‘Can’t the b**** f\*\*\*ing read? She’s not even trying. She f\*\*\*ed up my line.’ And we know that back in the room the guys would be up late discussing their sexual fantasies about Jennifer and Courteney. It was intense.” In 1999 there was a sexual harassment court case brought by writers’ assistant Amaani Lyle, whose job it was to transcribe brainstorming sessions. She was shocked to hear *Friends* writers discussing sleeping with Aniston and Cox, feigning masturbation and receiving oral sex. Crucially, Lyle lost the case. At the time it was seen as a victory for creative freedom for the writers of one the most popular TV shows of all time. “Oh, it could be brutal, but these guys — and it was mostly men in there — were sitting up until 3am trying to write the show so my attitude was, ‘Say what you like about me behind my back because then it doesn’t matter,’ ” Kudrow says, waving her hands in front of her face with Phoebe-like distaste. You can find the full story [here](https://www.thetimes.com/article/96c0ec0d-c83b-498a-9cda-3fa6d772ddf7?shareToken=bb992fa9305a909b4725d01667d61f94)
19
ripChazmo 2 days ago +71
Watching Friends now feels like a Time Machine.
71
falling_sideways 1 day ago +27
I watched something (or read something, I can't remember) that pointed out that Austin powers wouldn't work today, not because the level of change in the 30 years he was frozen is more than the 30 years since, but because the changing world he moved into was hopeful, whereas they would have to depict our current world as a new dystopia.
27
Jimbuscus 1 day ago +19
Early 90's TV like X-Files, Seinfeld, Twin Peaks & Friends.
19
I_Am_Robert_Paulson1 1 day ago +5
X-Files is so good
5
QueezyF 1 day ago +9
MST3K as well
9
ManOfTheBroth 2 days ago +37
It's comfort food.
37
SomewhereNo8378 1 day ago +10
set in the height of the American empire, before the start of the downfall
10
MRintheKEYS 1 day ago +17
Yeah, pre-9/11 had that “we can do and accomplish anything” attitude.
17
zsreport 1 day ago +7
Man I miss the 90s
7
MissInkeNoir 1 day ago +6
But it's not. It is set in fantasy land. These characters would not have had such lush housing, a whole part of a coffee shop reserved for them, and such nothing jobs. It was a lie then and it's a lie now. Look into the book Generation X by Douglas Copeland. He coined the term when he titled the book. That one book will tell you more about life for young adults in the 90s than any other.
6
_BreadDenier 1 day ago -9
Comically homophobic. Seinfeld has aged a lot better.
-9
wallabee_kingpin_ 1 day ago +5
The first few episodes have a shockingly progressive treatment of a lesbian relationship for the time. They make jokes but they're not degrading jokes, and Ross is portrayed as less mature/likeable than his ex-wife and her new wife.
5
BrockStar92 1 day ago +3
Tbh the episode about chandler having a “quality” wasn’t bad for the time either, even now it’s not *that* bad. Homophobia really wasn’t its biggest problem, the trans stuff wasn’t good and the fat jokes were terrible. Both those hold up way worse.
3
wallabee_kingpin_ 1 day ago +1
I'd say its worst quality was that non-white characters didn't appear or speak for more than 100 episodes. Homophobia and fat-shaming were real parts of 90s culture, so you could choose to see the show as a period piece that reflects the bigotry of the time. But New York in the 90s certainly wasn't 100% white, so they made a very conscious choice to stray far from reality on that point.
1
yammys 1 day ago +5
Golden Girls still holds up too
5
PracticalYellow3 11 hr ago +1
Except for the ones that got canceled and banned because of hatred for Betty White. 
1
AccurateSwim59 1 day ago +2
As a homosexual it’s really not that bad lol
2
nodogsallowed23 1 day ago +1
No it didn’t. It’s absolutely hilarious but it has some brutal moments.
1
MasterOfManyWorlds 2 days ago +23
Was he good at math or something?
23
KayBeeToys 2 days ago +7
He was a Transformer, if memory serves
7
alacrity 1 day ago +7
Transpondster.
7
cuddle_enthusiast 1 day ago +5
That’s not even a word
5
oatmeal28 1 day ago +4
Hahahahahah RIP Norm 
4
MRintheKEYS 1 day ago +3
She’s been really good in this new edition of The Comeback. Her wit and timing is still as sharp as ever. And she can still land a pretty hearty laugh with just a look or gesture. She’s aged like fine wine.
3
Interesting_Pay_4413 2 days ago +5
Yes, friends is indeed great. My favourite comfort show.
5
TheFoxsWeddingTarot 1 day ago +3
If it makes her feel any better me and my friends never thought of her as the “other” friend. We thought of her as the only one we’d realistically want to date. She was funny, creative, and not high strung like a house cat.
3
foghillgal 1 day ago +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
AFC-Wimbledon-Stan 2 days ago +2
It’s my guilty pleasure show I fear I know it’s white as hell but DAMN it hits a spot somehow
2
Ok_Pizza_4769 1 day ago +3
Its so similar to Living Single... which was black as hell but funnier. Same people wrote and profited from both shows
3
RawrRawr83 19 hr ago +1
I tried. I never got into it. It made me get to like the characters too much. Seinfeld hit it for me
1
Peeka789 2 days ago -1
The laugh track and music make me want to blow my brains out. But Ross and Joey are pretty funny. 
-1
KayBeeToys 2 days ago +22
Why does Ross, the largest Friend, not simply eat the others?
22
ScurryScout 1 day ago +3
Maybe they are saving that for sweeps.
3
tommyerstransplant 1 day ago -3
Show has always been dogshit
-3
sleepinginthebushes_ 1 day ago -1
We're in the wrong place to say it, but I agree. If someone says they love friends that's a red flag that they likely have a basic-ass sense of humor.
-1
RoyalZeal 1 day ago +2
Friends doesn't hold up as well as it once did, but damn it had some funny moments.
2
livinitup0 1 day ago +1
I don’t like how they gloss over that it was in fact David Schwimmer that made sure they were all paid fairly and equally and was genuinely the brains and coordinator of the talent of that show. It wouldn’t have been what it was without him specifically. Not to mention that in general, Friends is a horribly offensive show by modern standards. Trans, gay, lesbian and all sorts of minority micro aggressions in every single episode …a lot of them from phoebe Great for its time, super culturally relevant at the time… but that time is far over and the show does not hold up to modern scrutiny Am I also the only one asking if people just sucked at acting in the 90s? It’s hard watching a lot of these shows. ER is another one I’m noticing this on. Started watching this again when it auto played after the Pitt and it’s just… bad, like, the acting is just super forced compared to modern shows.
1
anoidciv 1 day ago +1
I'm confused about this too. During the period Friends came out, so did The Wire, The Sopranos, Seinfeld, Six Feet Under, and so on. So I don't understand when people say Friends was well acted or well-written, because it wasn't even for its time. I understand it was culturally impactful and a lot of people still find comfort in watching it and that's fine, but when can we as a society stop pretending it was anything above average?
1
MalibootyCutie 1 day ago
Yeah. We know. He told us at least 70 times in his book.
0
StuckInNY 1 day ago +1
The show jumped the shark when they started dating each other.
1
Tigerlily86_ 2 days ago -2
Friends was so corny 
-2
Ok_Pizza_4769 1 day ago +1
extremely.... I couldn't watch it when it was new in 90s
1
QueezyF 1 day ago
When they did their final episode, my reaction was “oh, okay.”
0
Vitaebouquet 1 day ago -6
Was he though? The writers are genius, obviously... but. Christian Slater's film.career was waning. Same age. David Boreanaz. Same age. David Suttcliffe. Jason Bateman... All the same age. F***, Trip from Enterprise... same age. Maybe, just maybe... He was a bad casting choice. Heresy I know but if you don't think Jason Bateman would have been stronger? Yeah, ok. Matthew Perry wasn't a genius and his SNL appearance really proved that FACT at the time.
-6
watch_out_4_snakes 1 day ago -5
It’s painful without a laugh track
-5
Naismith1891 1 day ago +9
It’s a live studio audience. Would you rather they talk over the noise? It’s essentially a play. I just don’t get these comments like it’s some sort of gotcha bc you watched a YouTube video removing the other humans involved in the process of a sitcom.
9
watch_out_4_snakes 1 day ago -7
What the shit are you on about? I made a statement, I didn’t do whatever the f*** you are bitching about.
-7
TheDuchessofQuim 1 day ago
It’s painful with one, too!
0
← Back to Board