· 117 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 9, 2026 at 3:20 PM

Lisa Kudrow Had to Return to Work 10 Days After Giving Birth and Got No Maternity Leave in the 1990s: ‘It’s Insane. I Would Never Do It Now’

Posted by cmaia1503


Lisa Kudrow Had to Return to Work 10 Days After Giving Birth and Got No Maternity Leave in the 1990s: ‘It’s Insane. I Would Never Do It Now’
Variety
Lisa Kudrow Had to Return to Work 10 Days After Giving Birth and Got No Maternity Leave in the 1990s: ‘It’s Insane. I Would Never Do It Now’
Lisa Kudrow says the "ethos" in Hollywood in the 1990s was "work was priority and everything else has to accommodate."

🚩 Report this post

117 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
cmaia1503 3 days ago +466
> “I had given birth to my son, and 10 days later I did ‘The Tonight Show,” Kudrow said. “And then I was in a meeting for ‘Analyze This,’ and my agents were like: ‘Yeah, we’ll be ok, you’re not shooting until July, and it’s May, it’s no big deal.’ I was like: ‘Ok, yeah, I might be by then…’ In the meeting, Billy Crystal said, ‘I mean, you look great, are you sure you’re able to do this? When did you give birth?’ And I told him, and he’s like: ‘Alright, well, we start Thursday.'” > “It was: ‘So today’s Monday, and then Thursday you have to fly to New York,’” she said. “I remember my husband’s parents were visiting from France, my parents were around, everyone around me went: ‘Of course you can do it,’ and I said: ‘But it’s wrong, I have a newborn!’ ‘… ‘But a baby nurse will go with you, look after the baby, baby won’t remember anything, it’s fine… you go do it.’ I went: ‘Alright, I don’t know,’ like, you know, your hormones are just like… ‘Alright, I mean, I guess!’” > “It’s insane,” Kudrow summarized. “I would never do it now. I thought this was insane. Everybody else thought [it’s fine]… I just deferred to everybody else and thought, ‘I guess it’s okay to go back to work immediately.’ I’m not mad at anybody. It was at a time when work was priority and everything else has to accommodate. That was sort of the ethos at that time.”
466
Madame_Arcati 3 days ago +365
NO ONE was caring for/looking after Lisa's health at all. It must have been so confusing for her, and, heartbreaking, and, isolating.
365
whichwitch9 3 days ago +152
Yeah, that's the wild part. They gave her zero time to physically heal, and it wasn't just her agents or the projects- her family pushed her, too. No one gave a shit that her body was still adjusting post pregnancy, or that she'd want to bond with her child.
152
NoPossibility5154 3 days ago +43
Because she was their cash cow
43
OregonMothafaquer 3 days ago -41
She’s one of the worst people in Hollywood and that’s a hard list to top
-41
Dankleburglar 3 days ago +13
What? Why?
13
KindToSpiteTheCruel 3 days ago +12
Wait, how? I know little about her I’m just curious.
12
OregonMothafaquer 3 days ago -27
She’s really really rude in person. Friend that works in Hollywood told me… I was skeptical but there’s a lot of stories about her at restaurants… and saying bizarre stuff to freshman actors like “they have the eyes of a serial killer” she told the guys wife he was going to murder her
-27
_THX_1138_ 3 days ago +18
not denying this but i also have never heard of this
18
LouisWillis98 3 days ago +30
She’s one of the worst people in Hollywood because she’s rude? Being rude doesn’t put you in the top 100 worse people in Hollywood
30
Asluckwouldnthaveit 3 days ago -30
She dated Conan so this tracks.
-30
brontosaurusguy 3 days ago -11
Kinda her responsibility? She says she'd no longer do it now (that she has hundreds of millions of dollars) but she did do it in pursuit of that money.  I'm not being unfair, many workers have no choice.  It's disgusting.  It shouldn't be only for the wealthy to take time off for childbirth
-11
Dry_Accident_2196 2 days ago -6
Confusing? Why do so many of you infantilize women? She was a grown woman making her own adult decisions. As it turns out, she could handle it and did because has had a support system. Looking back, she no longer agrees with her decisions at that time. But there was nothing confusing about this situation. She was smart and career focused, that’s it. I’m not saying this situation right or ideal, but I’m tired of people treating women like over emotional beings “confused” or helpless, or in need of others to help them make decisions.
-6
oliveGOT 2 days ago +7
You're right but... we can also be confused and confused doesn't equal helpless. I pressured myself to move a ton after my c-section because I had a baby to take care of after and tons of women do this, hell if I'll be lazy! 2 days later I couldn't move and was having anxiety attacks about dying in my sleep. It's a really weird time and most women are not fully themselves afterwards, physically but also emotionally. She maybe needed someone to say "it's okay that you don't want to do it."
7
Dry_Accident_2196 2 days ago +5
I understand. I was doing too much in my comment. I am being too sensitive to other folks constantly making women out to be conveniently helpless. You weren’t doing that so I apology.
5
Madame_Arcati 2 days ago +3
I used that word because, as it was written she did NOT have a support system, especially from her immediate family. As a survivor of very early (preverbal) neglect/abuse that was not made known to me, and then that I could not accept until much later in my-hard won, and managed without support-life, the feeling that I have most difficulty working through is confusion: confusion at how family members could treat something like childbirth (or other major health/life event) with a malignant indifference that could directly and negatively affect the health of the new mother. In NO way was it meant to infantilize her, or even to remotely suggest that she was inadequate to the challenge.
3
dancingdriver 3 days ago +50
I’m sorry, but this was not sitting well with me with the dates and all. She did not ‘have to return to work’. She was not returning to shoot Friends, which arguable was *her work*, this was a supporting role she probably signed up for before she gave birth. She booked a role in a movie that happened to fall on the hiatus of shooting Friends (and that according to the internet wrapped shooting in May, she gave birth in early May). I understand the craziness of leaving a new born for work, and the lack of maternity leave and rights in the US, but this is just a piece that bends the truth enough to raise more internet revolt. Because most people won’t read beyond the title and think she was returning to Friends, when she maybe had two weeks of shooting a supporting role.
50
dinosaurclaws 3 days ago +54
I think the Tonight Show appearance was a contractual obligation for Friends. But I saw another interview she did (the rewatch clips for Vanity Fair) and she describes the Analyze This role as an amazing opportunity that popped up right after she gave birth and she thought the circumstances were crazy but she did it and is grateful for having done so.
54
KayakerMel 3 days ago +32
Yeah, the birth timing worked out pretty perfectly for *Friends* (akin to teachers planning pregnancies to give birth at the very start of summer). It's the movie that was the issue. Granted, she may have felt like she would have burned bridges if she had dropped out of the film in order to have a de facto maternity leave during the *Friends* hiatus. And that's probably a very real concern. It sucks that she felt/was pressured to film the film when she would have preferred to stay with her new baby (and give her body more time to recover and heal).
32
dancingdriver 3 days ago +4
I understand that, but she did sign up to shoot a supporting role presumably way before she gave birth, knowing the time of filming. I know things change and maybe it got delayed and it fell on that period, but it was first her own choice.
4
NooStringsAttached 3 days ago +15
Read what she said. It was supposed to shoot in July. You’re so set on blaming her for her own choice, when’s it’s the exact opposite.
15
dancingdriver 3 days ago -6
I have, you seem to have read it but not understood it, and also don’t seem to know that it is common knowledge that network tv has their summer hiatus in May/June and they returned to filming in July. July was return date for Friends, not this movie.
-6
PuzzlePiece90 3 days ago +5
You have just misunderstood the quote. [Here is the video interview at 25:00](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9dJcjRGBf_E&pp=ygUVTGlzYSBrdWRyb3cgaW50ZXJ2aWV3)  She was told July. Billy Crystal said Thursday (in May) and even then she first thought she was still shooting in July because she was a smaller character.
5
PuzzlePiece90 3 days ago +10
She’s saying she was told by her agent July (which was months away) and then Billy Crystal revealed (after she agreed to it) that she’s flying out in three days. 
10
dancingdriver 3 days ago -5
No, read again. July was the return date for Friends. This whole conversation happened in one meeting.
-5
PuzzlePiece90 3 days ago +6
I think you need to read again. I had read it and also listened to the interview it came from. Like the other person who responded to you said, she was told in a couple months and it was later revealed to be in a few days.  Source: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9dJcjRGBf_E&pp=ygUVTGlzYSBrdWRyb3cgaW50ZXJ2aWV3 At around 25:00. She says nothing about the Friends return date. You incorrectly filled in the blanks. 
6
_AmericasSweetheart_ 3 days ago +6
She's saying that she agreed to it understanding that it was shooting in July per her agents. Then at a later date had a conversation with Crystal where he informed her that she was shooting on Thursday.
6
WiseAfternoon1678 3 days ago +2
I could barely walk to the grocery store one week after to get out of the house. Let alone go into a meeting.
2
Dry_Accident_2196 2 days ago +2
Are they paying you millions to do your day job? She could walk and get around and had a nanny. On the flip side. Our ancestors had babies, then were up cooking, cleaning, working the fields the same week. Happily we’ve largely advanced as a society but every mother’s limits are different.
2
WiseAfternoon1678 2 days ago +2
Not every society was like that.
2
thatotherotter 1 day ago +1
What ancestors are you referring to? Most cultures had a postpartum confinement period of 1-2months. Because it is actually medically unsafe.
1
Dry_Accident_2196 21 hr ago +1
All of them. Did you think women in the 1300s were given maternity leave anywhere? All of us came from folks that work a field somewhere on this planet that has to get up the same week of pregnancy to do their part for the household.
1
Meep4000 3 days ago +6
Also she is a multimillionaire so like she can do whatever she wants. Sure there could be repercussions to her career but I can’t really have sympathy for this as it’s still 100% a choice she had control over unlike someone making an average income who wouldn’t have the same options to not work by choose.
6
ladykansas 2 days ago +1
Well, if that's her first kid then she might not have really understood what she was signing up for. And it sounds like nobody around her really explained or advocated for her either. A lot of hard working people vastly underestimate how big of a change childbirth and motherhood are. And as a culture, the US does not really encourage new mothers to be well supported.
1
NooStringsAttached 3 days ago +1
She said she was told they were shooting in July. So she’d have May to July to rest. Then at the meeting on a Monday in May they said she was leaving Thur. that’s wildly different than July like she was told.
1
dancingdriver 3 days ago
Again, no. Reread the quote. July was return date for Friends.
0
ChangMinny 3 days ago +129
This is still quite normal in the US. I gave birth the Tuesday before Thanksgiving and had to be at work the following Monday, 4th degree tear and all.  Yay maternity leave! 
129
glockenbach 3 days ago +42
What in the world? That’s barbaric!
42
azurerain 3 days ago +20
Omg I'm sorry, how is that even legal?! For a lot of women in other countries, planning for a child involves ensuring they coordinate their leave with their partner and deciding how much leave they each want to take (6 months, 9 months, 1 year or even 1.5 years). Without those basic conditions and assurances, having a baby would be an absolute no-go for many I think. Because how do you recover, when do you breastfeed? Daycare shouldn't even be a factor before 1 year. I can't wrap my mind around this... EDIT: To add "in other countries"
20
ChangMinny 3 days ago +33
I didn’t qualify for FMLA so I my option was use the PTO I had. I had about 10 days of PTO, but couldn’t take them because my boss demanded, on threatening of firing me, that I needed to attend a virtual conference the week after I gave birth. Took all the calls with camera off and a pillow between my legs because I couldn’t sit up due to pain.  No, that kind of treatment of new mothers should NOT be legal. 
33
azurerain 3 days ago +12
Too many heartless, sociopathic people are in decision-making positions - from low level managers up to high-level policymakers. Hoping for progress. You all deserve so much better.
12
Eggsegret 3 days ago +5
Jesus f****** christ does your boss not have a heart? Seriously it’s already one thing for a boss to bitchy about an employee taking PTO but to be bitchy about taking time off work after giving birth is a whole new low. Straight up barbaric but then it’s to be expected when if there’s no legislation preventing it
5
ChangMinny 3 days ago +16
No, he had no heart. He also made fun of me for using a donut to sit with until I was about 8 weeks postpartum.  I will NEVER work for an Israeli company again 
16
Booo_you_whore_ 3 days ago +9
4th degree and back to work!!! 🫣 And i thought my 1 week of vacation time was bad jeez.
9
TheFoxsWeddingTarot 2 days ago +2
I worked for a woman in 1988 in a bank in San Francisco. Her due date came and went and she said nothing.. then a few days later we realized she had the baby and was keeping it in her office with the door closed. That was interesting.
2
ChangMinny 2 days ago +2
Bless her heart :(
2
TheFoxsWeddingTarot 2 days ago +1
She was a special person. Raised in the Czech Republic and had become a VP at this small S&L at age 27. Our group of 6 or so was keeping the entire place afloat because we did the “secondary marketing” buying and selling of mortgages. Her life must’ve been such a roller coaster. The only time she ever showed any emotion was when the wall came down and she had news playing on the radio for several days. It was an interesting group, a couple of banky white guys… one who put himself through college as a garbage man, an Iranian woman, a woman who had grown up in Macau, and this woman from Czechoslovakia. And me, the highly detail oriented art school kid who knew where everything was and was a wiz in Lotus.
1
NooStringsAttached 3 days ago +1
What?! My goodness. What type of job or industry? That’s terrible.
1
BosonTigre 3 days ago +1
Wtf? Meanwhile if Brett fractures his wrist because he had to much to drink before going skiing, nobody questions the time he needs off of work... because it really hurts, you know?
1
penninsulaman713 3 days ago +1
My mom went back to work 3 days after her c section back in the 90s. I had 3 months maternity leave and I still didn't feel like it was enough.  Then you're damned by society either way after, as a working mom or as a SAHM. 
1
CourtneyHat3 3 days ago +198
There are a lot of people who have stories like this and its honestly sad as hell. Childbirth is already so stressful and post partum such an issue and your job just wants you back for more.
198
wtfElvis 3 days ago +39
I remember a story where a lady went back to work the next day! I can’t remember why she did it but it was something about being able to take more time off a little later.
39
Capt-Crap1corn 3 days ago +23
If I were president, women would be able to take a year off. Its ridiculous that labor takes priority over everything else.
23
ProcyonHabilis 3 days ago +27
>ridiculous that labor takes priority over everything else Obviously I understand what you mean, but that phrasing is kind of funny
27
Capt-Crap1corn 3 days ago +5
It is now that I think about it lol
5
unspecifiedbehavior 3 days ago +8
If you were in a reasonable country they could already.
8
flakemasterflake 3 days ago
This is a freelance gig (as all acting jobs are.) Kudrow didn't need to take a job as a contractor ....
0
lucygoosey38 3 days ago +16
This is very common thing in the US. Most other countries have really good maternity leaves. When I had my kid 15 years ago in Canada I got 12 month off with 50% of my wage. I think now you can go up to 18 months but I think it’s 30% after 12. But correct me if I’m wrong, it’s been a while. And some countries give both parents time off.
16
sc8132217174 3 days ago +5
My boss/owner of the company texted me 7 days after I gave birth and said “I hope the baby is sleeping through the night! Let me know when you have time to chat about X project.” Baby had dropped 10% in the hospital, I’d already had 3 doctors appointments since getting home, was waking every 2 hours to feed her, had a third degree tear to heal from, had to pee every 2-3 hours to prevent hemorrhage, around the clock pain killers. I didn’t reply. I’m on maternity leave and still upset about it. He also decided to walk back his verbal offer to top up my pay because he decided the 70% from CA disability was enough. I’ve worked there for more than a decade and routinely worked more than 40 hrs to finish up major projects before I went on leave. Luckily my husband’s company gave him as much paternity leave as I got in state maternity leave and they actually did top it up, plus gave him his annual raise. I already know I’m forgoing raises this year since my annual falls on my leave.
5
mckenner1122 2 days ago +1
Poor Lisa! She would have had to figure out how to live her life with only DOZENS of millions instead of HUNDREDS of millions! She had NO CHOICE!
1
QueenBoleyn 3 days ago -18
No one forced her to take the job. It’s not like a major film can just be rescheduled because she decided to have a kid.
-18
_AmericasSweetheart_ 3 days ago +2
She was deceived by her agents to take the job. They gave her the wrong start date.
2
[deleted] 3 days ago -1
[deleted]
-1
QueenBoleyn 3 days ago -2
It’s a choice
-2
[deleted] 3 days ago +1
[deleted]
1
QueenBoleyn 3 days ago -2
She chose to do it
-2
[deleted] 3 days ago
[deleted]
0
QueenBoleyn 3 days ago
Uh huh
0
BrilliantPiccolo5220 3 days ago +71
The belief that the US is the best country in the world, and the best place to live, has been a lie since day one. I used to visit friends and family there and the more I heard, the less I could believe they bought it. I’d try to point out what I thought was obvious, the benefits of maternity leave, universal healthcare, subsidized university education, the list goes on and on, but nope, they had FREEDOM. Which as far as I could tell, meant freedom from high taxes, and that looked about all.
71
doxiesrule89 3 days ago +15
Yup. And the only people who have “freedom” by not paying tax are the ultra wealthy, who can easily afford things like baby nurses and fancy health insurance and college tuitions . Normal people pay much more of our income towards things other countries provide , than the people in those countries are taxed for those services. Or they simply go without/die. But you can’t seem to convince anyone here of that at all. They have been well taught that the worst thing that could happen is them paying a few dollars to cover their neighbors surgery, bc why should they if they are healthy? It is the sick persons fault they are sick, and so they deserve to pay their own way.  I am disabled and the amount of people who think I should be dead instead of receiving government assistance because I can’t work , is astounding 
15
brontosaurusguy 3 days ago +5
Cuba maternity leave: 18 weeks Iran maternity leave:  9 months JUST SAYING
5
BrilliantPiccolo5220 3 days ago +2
Key Regional Maternity Leave Trends (2026): Europe: Typically offers the most generous leave. Bulgaria: 58 weeks (410 days) at 90% pay. Norway: 13 weeks (100% pay) to 49+ weeks (various options). Sweden: 480 days (shared) at 80% pay. UK: 52 weeks total (6 weeks at 90% pay, then 33 weeks at a lower rate). Germany: 14 weeks at 100% pay. Mexico: 12 weeks at 100% pay. Chile: 18 weeks India: 26 weeks at 100% pay. Japan: 14 weeks paid through social security. Australia: 18 weeks Most of the world has maternity leave.
2
oliveGOT 2 days ago +1
And mostly all well above 12 weeks. I took 12, unpaid. I'm older and had a good amount saved. Even going back at 12 was awful. It felt so unnatural. I can't imagine the women who have to go right back! It's insanity.
1
BrilliantPiccolo5220 2 days ago +1
I can’t imagine going back after 12. I went back after a year. What really saved me was the medical leave, and child care I qualified for during my second pregnancy. I was sick for the whole nine months, with hospitalization. I couldn’t work, or care for my 3 year old, or hold down water.
1
BeginningPlastic3747 3 days ago +17
the US being one of the only developed countries with no federal paid maternity leave makes this less of a "90s were wild" story and more of a "we just never fixed it" story.
17
Creepy-Floor-1745 3 days ago +6
Now I work for tech company in California and my coworkers,  moms and dads, take months of paid time off. They work from home, pumping or nursing, and have family or nanny or daycare center depending on what suits their family’s needs. They have breast pumps covered by insurance.  I don’t tell them what it was like when I worked in a hotel and had my babies. I quietly celebrate that they’ll never know what that was like, quietly celebrate the progress we’ve made for some moms and their babies in the US.   I appreciate Lisa Kudrow telling her story 
6
skepticalolyer 3 days ago +20
My attorney friends in private practice in the 1990s? They all did this. Yes, it was inhumane
20
BurlieGirl 3 days ago +30
Well it’s easy to say she wouldn’t do it now - she’s a well established multi-millionaire, she doesn’t need to. But at that time she clearly did need to do it to maintain her career so she could possibly have discussed that aspect in addition to the millions of normal women who need to return to work so soon after giving birth. In Canada and so many other countries, we don’t need to worry about this (anymore), thankfully.
30
Spiritual_Egg_700 3 days ago +12
If you were an A list actor with the #1 show on TV, making $1,000,000 an episode. Your ass would be at work.
12
Aggressive_Chuck 1 day ago +1
This was a separate job.
1
buttflapper444 3 days ago +14
What about women who are in the working class and don't get any maternity leave at all? You know, working for big companies where you deliver your baby and they expect you to be back at work the next day? Or they lay you off because you had a child and they don't want to give you any leave? This is a daily occurrence in the USA
14
Myca84 3 days ago +3
I had to go back to work when my son was 4 weeks old. It was that or lose my job
3
78pimpala 3 days ago +2
im a male in the us, and i get 12 weeks
2
SinickalOne 3 days ago +2
Truly wild that things are this way in the US. I’m in one of the best states for paid parental leave, and even then it’s still a far cry from what the rest of the modern world gets.
2
Maxie0921 3 days ago +2
Unfortunately I think that was public perception at the time. My mother said the same thing and how she would never had done it now if she had known better but she went along with what everyone else said.
2
GumboForBreakfast 3 days ago +2
So no one told her it was gonna be this way?
2
Much_Usual_3855 3 days ago +3
I feel bad that she didn't get maternity leave but then I realise that she got millions and millions of dollars instead.
3
IckyJ2112 3 days ago +2
You mean she had to do the same thing that the vast majority of us Americans have to do? Pretty much every company I’ve ever worked for doesn’t give new moms or dad’s more than two weeks after birth before they have to return. Some are even less. Sorry Lisa, but that’s the way it is for the majority of folks.
2
joxx67 3 days ago +2
I read that the cast members of Friends still make over $20million a year in residuals. So maybe I don’t feel too bad for her.
2
Neither_Transition_7 3 days ago +1
I feel for her when she tells this story. I really relate to feeling like you’re crazy bc you want to advocate for yourself. But everyone around you, including the ppl dearest to you, push you in the opposite direction. And you don’t have the tools yet to stand up for yourself own intuition. And so she did what seems the logical thing on paper (huge movie with major movie stars, legendary director, maybe huge paycheck who knows?) But in the end it’s like, who cares that she was in that movie? Granted I haven’t seen it since it came out, I’m sure she was delightful in it. But maybe could have been played by someone else without much change to the overall project? She has played several legendary characters all on her own, she didn’t need Analyze That. In the rear view mirror it maybe would’ve meant so much more to her to have that time with her son. Or… maybe not! Who knows. But that’s what I hear by her saying this.
1
adchick 3 days ago +1
Shockingly common. Leave does not apply to small businesses and independent contractors. When I worked in advertising, I had to tell our PM that she only had 2 weeks paid vacation for the year, so that was all HR would pay for. Just awful.
1
poirotsgreycells 3 days ago +1
I’ve been seeing Lisa Kudrow a ton lately
1
NayNay_Cee 3 days ago +1
I went back to work 3 weeks later due to unpaid maternity leave and that was in the 2010s
1
Hefty_Breadfruit 3 days ago +1
I remember hearing and reading stores like this and thinking “damn. That’s crazy and sad” then I had a baby and my heart literally is torn to pieces. This should be no one’s reality. Everyone deserves time with their baby and baby deserves time with them.
1
DetailMysterious4797 3 days ago +1
I had three weeks in 2007
1
nikeguy69 2 days ago +1
I’m watching her show on HBOMAX THE COMEBACK at first it was a little boring for the first season but season two was okay.
1
AttemptFree 2 days ago +1
She only got millions and billions of dollars and that's fucked up. She "wouldnt do it now" : yeah that's cuz shes already super wealthy set for life and her kids kids kids
1
AttemptFree 2 days ago +1
What happens when You trade your basic needs for money
1
weirdhoney216 3 days ago
I mean it sucks but I struggle to feel bad for a rich person being a working mother the same as I do a regular woman
0
WriteOrDie1997 3 days ago +7
She’s still a human who was recovering from a major trauma to the body
7
weirdhoney216 3 days ago +1
She could have taken time off, she had the money to do so. She chose to continue. Also had the money to take a nanny if she wanted to, that takes a massive pressure off
1
HansWeeblemeyer 3 days ago +1
Didnt they write the entire script around that?
1
barebuttgodzilla_ 3 days ago
Awe, just like non celebrity women must deal with.
0
Horatio-Leafblower 3 days ago -3
Hang on, that was her decision, absolutely no one forced her! She is literally self employed.
-3
S0biepan 3 days ago
Now that I have tens of millions I would never do what people are forced to do
0
Gmarlon123 3 days ago -44
Is she whining about making millions of dollars and being asked to come back to work for millions of dollars- in America people are forced to that for 22/ hr. If you’re going to whine about it atleast become an advocate for women that go through this for poverty level wages without the best doctors, therapists, nutrionists, and agents. Jeeez get a clue lady
-44
CowAggravating7745 3 days ago +15
Sounds like you’re the one whining here, not Lisa.
15
Gmarlon123 3 days ago -12
To be fair i had just read a clip about her calling herself the “6th” friend and no one really cared about her on set- i mean the bigger stars advocated for equal pay- I don’t even know what she’s plugging but all her interview clips this last week have been whiny
-12
SecondToLastOfSheila 3 days ago +6
It ain't her fault you're poor.
6
Gmarlon123 3 days ago -2
I’m not a woman, impossible for me to be poor
-2
tyleritis 3 days ago +3
Right? I mean, your body is in tune with your net worth and will heal faster when it’s higher. The stress on your organs and hormone imbalance is why doctors prescribe a hefty check to their patients.
3
ZuluTesla_85 3 days ago -1
Lisa Kudrow was/is a multi-millionaire. She makes $20 million dollars a year on Friends residuals alone. She needs to shut up. Some of us are trying to make a living.
-1
Rude-Coke 3 days ago -2
Does she not have a PR team 
-2
oprah_did-911 3 days ago -4
Were on the cusp of WWIII and this is at the top of the news feed who gives a shit about this washed up hag or the shittiest sitcom ever friends
-4
Novus20 3 days ago +1
Yeah! F*** fighting for proper parental leaves and supports!
1
ZGadgetInspector 3 days ago -3
She couldn’t do it now; she’s on Medicare. Haha
-3
Sweaty_palms229 3 days ago -6
Imagine having to sit down and talk to someone ohhhh the pain and agony it must have been to do the easiest shit in the world. I feel for people who have to go back to real jobs not these f****** prick who whine while getting paid a shit load to do the f****** barest of minimum
-6
← Back to Board