This is a slippery slope. I was more than happy to donate when listnook appealed for a cash injection but I didn't realise it was going to turn into a full subscriber model. I specifically didn't want any extra features over anyone who didn't donate as it starts to create a different class of user.
I'm sorry, but I will not be subscribing once my initial $20 runs out.
146
stfudonnyJul 20, 2010
+620
I don't like this. When online communities start having different classes of members, they start to fail. Miserably.
620
ttthekkkingJul 20, 2010
+44
I totally agree with stfudonny. I used to love listnook before. But now I feel its only for rich guys who can afford to pay them.
I moved to US some time back, BUT if I was in my home country, there is NO WAY I could have afforded $48 a year being a student. I know lot of you will find it strange, but trust me on currency ratio.
There is no way my parents would have spent that much for me.
Sorry Listnook, you disappointed me this time. :(
Donating something is TOTALLY different thing. But charging people monthly is a whole new game.. I dont feel like family now. I feel like I am paying some outsider.
44
isarlJul 20, 2010
+238
I really want to say you're out of your element, but I can't help but agree.
238
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+22
[deleted]
22
Tapeworm_in_penisJul 20, 2010
+57
Something Awful requires everyone who wants to post to pay - so no.
57
keithslaterJul 20, 2010
+28
That's not true. They have platinum access which gives you:
Platinum members get access to additional forum features, including search, private messaging, and image uploads. Platinum also makes you cooler than other users.
They also have Archives Access and no ads which you have to pay an additional amount for.
28
raldiJul 20, 2010
+103
We're not being cavalier about it. But [like I said earlier this month](http://blog.listnook.com/2010/07/listnook-needs-help.html), listnook desperately needs the green light to hire more engineers, and so we've got to find some way to make money. We don't want "punch the monkey" popups. So we're going to be trying some other things in the coming months in lieu of horrible overadvertising.
I hope you guys will give us a chance to keep your trust as we keep trying new things; in return we promise to be open and to listen and respond to your feedback. But please focus on "here's an example of a specific thing that's bad right now," not "I predict that we're on a slippery slope and things will eventually become bad one day."
And if you have other ideas for keeping the site afloat, please share them!
103
selusaJul 20, 2010
+74
>And if you have other ideas for keeping the site afloat, please share them!
Okay! Here's mine.
**Listnook Gold Promotional Packages**
Have a promo package advertising "*Listnook Gold*", such as- C**** 1-3 color t-shirt, stickers, a lanyard with a "name tag" (think listnook meet and greets), and other silly things such as buttons, pens, bobble heads, etc.
Tier the packages and have each package come with a 12 month subscription, non-stackable. Give the different tiers different levels of Gold access.
* **Tier 1** • $5 : 5 stickers and a button. *(Get the badge for current year. Allow people to continue stacking new badges, new years, return customers.)*
* **Tier 2** • $10 : 5 stickers, a button, a pen, car decal. *(Get the badge + friends list details)*
* **Tier 3** • $20 : 10 stickers, two buttons, a pen, car decal, lanyard. *(Badge + Friends list + Sorting)*
* **Tier 4** • $30 : 10 stickers, two buttons, two pens, car decal, lanyard, t-shirt. *(Badge + Friends list + Sorting + Access to TOP SECRET what ever it may be)*
This way you are not forcing a monthly subscription and you're allowing people to participate that otherwise wouldn't by giving them a choice on how much they want to spend.
*Edit: I understand the goal here is to make money and not spend it. But I think that with a little money put forth you can get a bunch of c**** promotional objects that people can use to show off how much they love listnook, versus just purchasing vanilla items in the listnook store.*
*Edit: Keep re-editing to fix format and spelling...*
74
gustogusJul 20, 2010
+19
I sort of like this, its like the yearly PBS donation drive. Get a few special Guest AMA's for pledge week!
Donate a minimum of *this* much and you get *this* prize pack.
Go up to $100, hell even a super $1,000 prize pack that includes a tote bag! Add a number to the Listnook Gold to show how many years someones participated in the drive.
Hard to budget or show numbers in a corporate type environment, but I think it would have a better impact on the community.
edit: Oh.. you must also have a huge gaudy donation thermostat in the right panel during pledge week.
19
raldiJul 20, 2010
+14
Wow, you're getting a lot of upvotes. I'll definitely put your comment on the overhead projector at the next meeting of the listnook bureaucracy.
14
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+5
Here's a post I made a few days back.
http://www.listnook.com/r/listnook.com/comments/cqm1b/why_listnook_doesnt_have_any_of_my_advertising/c0uhz64
I work on a top 20 website. We have no problem making millions just from ads.
I'd be happy to talk about some specifics in a pm if you're interested.
5
kleinbl00Jul 20, 2010
+63
I would much prefer a "punch the monkey" popup to a Sony ad whose mute button doesn't work.
**F***** your Sony ad.
63
JVizJul 20, 2010
+2
Don't kill the goose that laid the golden egg.
2
krispykrackersJul 20, 2010
+2
My main concern was that, ever since the email verification thing happened, I've seen enough mod mail to know that people who have been users for years are pissed off that they couldn't submit like they normally did. That's the main reason I didn't verify my email then, or subscribe to listnook gold. I felt like, if I'm going to do something for you, you should do something for me, not take away privileges from other members who didn't want to verify or donate. Hence, the reason I've neither verified or subscribed.
I do like the new listnook gold, however. I like having new features. Well done. That is almost enough reason for me to subscribe.
I just don't agree with making other long-term users suffer by taking away their posting privileges because they simply want to listnook the way they've always been listnooking.
Also, you need more diversified merch.
2
TheBatmanToMyBruceJul 20, 2010
+30
I donated initially, but I'm not going to subscribe. I have enough things that automatically remove money from my bank account every month, and it's part of my personal financial policy to heavily scrutinize any recurring monthly payments.
I think my yearly cutoff for sites that don't actually provide me a service that's monetarily valuable (like a t****** tracker) is about $10.
30
HomunculiheadedJul 20, 2010
+13
>listnook desperately needs the green light to hire more engineers, and so we've got to find some way to make money.
The other side of the obvious "hire business people, not engineers" advice is that hiring more engineers will only make your problem worse. If you get more engineers you'll undoubtably make a better site, but that will the only attract more users. And since you don't have a sustainable business model this will only mean you have larger problems. Get your business model down first (I don't think it's listnook gold) and then worry about how you're going make the site more awesome.
13
first2di3Jul 20, 2010
+15
Replying here in hope you see it..
I donated not because I want special privilege's, I donated because I want to make listnook better for everyone. Making this an "exclusive club" goes against the very reason I donated. So thanks for letting me keep access to lounge, but I hope you plan on extending the listnook gold features to everyone on listnook eventually.
15
BogbearJul 20, 2010
+88
There's a lot more you guys could be doing to generate cash. You need businessmen on your team...
[See past post on the subject](http://www.listnook.com/r/announcements/comments/cnth8/making_ends_meet_tldr_remember_that_joke_about/c0twf97?context=3)
88
jedbergJul 20, 2010
+53
Those people cost money too. In theory, I'm in charge of doing the types of things you mention. In practice, I spend all day admining boxes because we are short on engineers.
53
BogbearJul 20, 2010
+26
Can you guys comment on the relationship between Condé Nast and Listnook?
I know [raldi mentioned](http://blog.listnook.com/2010/07/listnook-needs-help.html) they can only give you guys $X but I find it hard to believe that, with Listnook being one of their largest web properties, your bosses won't be interested in finding new ways to make money.
If you took the time to put together a proposal for a new ad program or a more affordable job board, would the bigwigs blow you off?
I think the issue is that instead of looking to develop longterm streams of revenue, you're putting together a donation program. It's not like the donation program will vastly increase your revenues or will make Condé Nast start paying more attention!
26
davidreiss666Jul 20, 2010
+10
That's the thing I don't understand. You think Conde Nast would see putting more money into Listnook as an investment. It ain't like they would be asking for unlimited funding. But they need some immediate help, and they got told "make me money or die"....
I work for a place with 3-4 times the staff on a site 1/100th the size of Listnook. We get funding for stuff when we need it and can justify it. I can't understand CN not at least thinking "Well, hire two guys and buy some servers and stuff, and we'll see if they can't earn it back". They aren't a poor parent organization.
Or maybe things are worse than we are lead to believe. Maybe CN is going to shit-can Listnook entirely. Which, if that happens... Well, it's pretty much the end. Who would buy them if CN's opinion is that they never can and never will make money?
10
NSMikeJul 20, 2010
+9
So what the hell is your relationship with your corporate overlords for if they won't front a little bit of their own cash and time to help monetize this?! (Beyond maintenance and your usual budget, that is.)
9
ZeppelinJ0Jul 20, 2010
+1
Why not just leave up the option to donate though? Making the subscription model is barring out a lot of people that might be willing to give over some money overall; I know I'm one, for as much as I love Listnook, it's not worth money out of my pocket month after month.
Ultimately I have to question why the responsibility of maintaining Listnook is up to the users. If Listnook or Conde Nast can't support this site in it's current state, shouldn't it be the responsibility of those within the company to find a new stream of revenue?
And lastly don't you feel that this Listnook Gold w/ member benefits will split the userbase? I'm just not liking where this panhandling is headed. And shit, I saw you guys were hiring an Intern a while back... Why not reach out again for college/grad students in the field and offer Interships or Co-ops? You'd have another body to deal with the load; hell I'd be willing to join up.
1
ScarkerJul 20, 2010
+1
>needs the green light to hire more engineers,
Aren't there willing Listnookors who would do this for free?
1
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+29
[deleted]
29
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+1
I am seriously unimpressed with this whole thing. I far prefer shitty load times to this class of superiors you are creating. You are turning this site from something I feel a part of into somethign i feel apart from. You ask for trust, but you will recieve none from me, listnook gold was a joke, now listnook gold is a joke. Kill it before it kills you.
1
redditaddictttJul 20, 2010
+75
How much cut does Conde Nast get?
75
raldiJul 20, 2010
+71
Let me put it this way: If we reach the point where our revenue stream could pay for our own damn engineers, and they *still* won't let us hire, we'll be the ones *leading* the revolt.
71
[deleted]Jul 21, 2010
+2
[deleted]
2
LuminaireJul 20, 2010
+49
Here, we wrote a guide to advertising listnook this weekend. There are over 360 comments now, many from listnookors with lots of experience in web advertising. Please read it. [Listnook guide to advertising](http://www.listnook.com/r/listnook.com/comments/cqm1b/why_listnook_doesnt_have_any_of_my_advertising/)
49
tomg555Jul 20, 2010
+11
What did you guys benefit from being acquired by Conde Nast?
Serious question, I have no idea how big businesses work.
11
masklinnJul 20, 2010
+13
> What did you guys benefit from being acquired by Conde Nast?
being paid at all, instead of having to eat their own babies. Also having a place to work in (next to WIRED's offices) instead being 4 on a 12" Powerbook in a damp back-alley leeching wifi from an unsecured network.
But from what raldi's saying, Listnook is still losing money for Conde Nast, so they aren't *too* willing to hire new staff and shit as long as that's still going on.
13
SomecatJul 20, 2010
+115
I made an initial gold donation, but i can't afford a monthly fee.
Now if have to deal with the disownership by my lounge counterparts.
115
raldiJul 20, 2010
+89
Read to the end of the blog post -- those of you who signed up as charter members will forever retain the trophy and access to any secret members-only lounge that may or may not exist.
89
bobcatJul 20, 2010
+7
Oh look, I'm one of raldi's friends... HEY!!!
7
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+23
The community already hates pre-order only DLC in games and now there's pre-order only DLC (literally) for listnook? Something that can only be received once?
...
Those of us with no ability to use paypal and living too far to send postcards (rural India where the post takes 5 days to reach the nearest major city, let alone another country) are completely out of the loop until you get other payment methods.
23
trustmeepJul 20, 2010
+1
I donated prior to this offer (on July 17th) and never got an acknowledgment, trophy or access to supposed lounges.
1
furgotsJul 20, 2010
+1
Did listnook ever get my origami crane covered in gold glitter? :)
Edit: Replaced frown with smile! Yay!
1
Dienekes00Jul 20, 2010
+2
So I donated 15 bucks, almost immediately. If I buy another year, it'll just attach to March-ish paid-up time, yes? It's not going overlap and cancel out the donation, is it?
2
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+66
[deleted]
66
JoshSNJul 20, 2010
+1
I sent in a card but I don't have any new trophy.
I wrote it out in longhand and everything.
1
ruinmakerJul 20, 2010
+49
One more good feature would be some kind of "you have xxx months left on your membership" or a "membership expires on x/x/xxxx."
Otherwise, thanks for the features! Comment sorting allows for a fun bit of ego-stroking nostalgia
49
wcalvertJul 20, 2010
+23
[qgyh2 is Adam Savage?!?!?!?](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_SMII3qiVCz8/TEDqA7y_IuI/AAAAAAAAAKo/h8ZJmPTDbbU/s400/savage.png)
23
raldiJul 20, 2010
+26
Oh c***, no, I meant to say that he acts like a damn savage.
26
synthaxxJul 20, 2010
+50
So, who else is going to add Adam Savage to their friends?
50
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+14
Adam Savage is the guy that runs the TLDR sublistnook and thus keeps track every post and comment on listnook? I find that hard to believe but also really want to believe it.
14
HideousJul 20, 2010
+31
Wait, what? Is this THE TRUTH?
31
catmoonJul 20, 2010
+19
Is it a sign of things to come for us c**** bastards that this comments page opened with a **LOUD AS HELL** Sony VAIO sidebar ad?
I guess we deserved that one...
19
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+17
[deleted]
17
HuruHaraJul 20, 2010
+10
> I would have donated anyway but now I just feel taken.
Here, dude, have an upvote. Consider this an internet h****** for being gypped.
10
ilikedirigiblesJul 20, 2010
+6
.
6
raldiJul 20, 2010
+8
> Dropped 2 subsequent messages
Yikes, that's totally unacceptable. Where did you send those messages? I want to find out why they were dropped and make sure this doesn't happen again.
8
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+2
[deleted]
2
EkrofJul 20, 2010
+37
I like it.
What about @listnook.com? That would attract a lot of subscribers :)
37
HelloMaxwellJul 20, 2010
+493
I don't like this. I don't like the direction this is going. I'm not sure why you guys can't find a way to make money off of this site but I don't think this is the way to do it.
493
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+68
[removed]
68
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+149
[deleted]
149
KeyserSosaJul 20, 2010
+56
We did this to give users another way to support the site. We're not going to use this as an excuse to filter content or subtract features from non-subscribed users, and rather than TotalFark, I think we're thinking about this more like [Ars Premier](http://arstechnica.com/subscriptions/) which keeps their focus on hiding ads and a couple of premium features.
In this case, when I say "premium" I'm thinking of stuff like profile page sorts which are hard(er) to scale up to the whole community. [We're actually in the process of adding a bunch of capacity, and I'd like to try to return sorts to *everyone*, meaning the "premium" here is that the smaller gold subset gets first dibs while we work out the scaling kinks.]
It's been said before, but we are trying not to be evil.
56
xzxzzxJul 20, 2010
+42
> It's been said before, but we are trying not to be evil.
Listnook isn't a charity. It's a business. We know that, but we don't like to think about it. To us, it's a social gathering point, like the Starbucks on the corner. Starbucks is a business too, but we don't think of it that way.
I gave you guys money. And I felt like I was contributing to something. But this *feels* like a subscription. It feels like a business transaction. I give you money, you give me features.
The problem is that you've set a price on a service, and now my mind is weighing those features against your price point. And it doesn't measure up.
Here's what I think:
**Don't give me a price.**
Give me a suggested donation. Let me give you less than that, and still get some kind of shiny token (like a trophy) that has no value except "hey, thanks for your support".
If you want, put a minimum on the features that are more expensive in server resources, or a minimum in general to deal with the work of dealing with so many transactions.
But by putting a *price* on the whole thing, I don't feel like "hey, I did something cool today; improving the community while makin' those cool listnook admin guys' day a bit nicer". I feel like I bought something. Even your "thank you" note feels perfunctory now; something a cashier at the grocery store would say to me.
42
Zoethor2Jul 21, 2010
+4
Please, please, admins read this post. I don't care about the features - let me donate what I want and if it isn't greater than X, I don't get anything but the trophy, but I can still donate, and in an amount I'm comfortable with. And I'm not paying for a service, I'm donating to help out an internet "friend".
4
HelloMaxwellJul 20, 2010
+82
I understand. Well, actually, I don't *really* understand. The fact that four engineers maintain this HUGE site is astounding, especially when having to constantly worry about appeasing and maintaining the community.
It's just that... I've seen this before. You create the ability to hide ads with a paid subscription and all of a sudden the ads become more and more obtrusive. The solution: if you don't like the ads, pay the fee.
I don't believe *you'll* do this, its your bosses I'm worried about: the 5 billion dollar corporation Conde Nast. If they see a door they can open to make more money, they might open it. I'd rather the door never be built.
I don't like it, but I'm not going anywhere. I trust you guys. Also, I just realized how much of a fuckin p**** I sound like in this thread. Keep up the good work and don't be evil.
82
ungoodJul 20, 2010
+9
> It's just that... I've seen this before. You create the ability to hide ads with a paid subscription and all of a sudden the ads become more and more obtrusive. The solution: if you don't like the ads, pay the fee.
Instructables did this. To the point that I'm not renewing my pro membership because they started using auto-play video ads.
9
KeyserSosaJul 20, 2010
+31
I can only give you my promise that we won't make the ads more obtrusive. We can't always keep the flash at bay, but pop overs, unders, arounds and thrus will never be a part of the site. It just doesn't fit, and at the end of the day, ads are about clicks and performance as much as they are about impressions. Appeals do better than demands.
In fact, you'll note that the ad iframe is served up on a separate subdomain, so it is kept in it's 300x250 allocated region by more than my sheer force of will. ;)
31
MrRGnomeJul 20, 2010
+24
The entire mood of this monetization campaign has drastically changed. It's gone from "Listnook needs help, would the amazing user base please come to our aid?" to "Listnook is going to start charging a monthly subscription to users who are willing so that we may make some money."
The first provokes an outpouring of love. The second is like asking to be taxed.
I'd consider a once every 3 month donation drive, with all who donate receiving 3 months of listnook gold status and a unique trophy. I do not like the idea of this subscription. We want to feel good about helping listnook, not like we're subscribing to something.
24
Locke005Jul 20, 2010
+4
But once the page sorting is scalable there may be some reluctance on your part to switch it over to everyone as you are taking features away from paying members. If 30% of listnook gold subscribers only register to use the sorting feature and then you offer it to everyone you will lose 30% of your subscribers. This is where the problem is.
Taking features away from a paying subscribed base and giving it to a non-paying user base seems highly unlikely.
4
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+19
Please advise how I can subscribe *without* creating a Paypal account…
19
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+6
Listnook, I tried to pay you guys, I really did. F*** Paypal in their ass with a sandpaper wrapped cucumber.
I once had an account with them, which hasn't been used in ages. I tried to pay, but got stopped because I have an account with that card and email address already set up. I decided to go delete my account.
I can't because I forgot my password, and the email verification process isn't enough, they want to verify a card number. I don't have that card (since I made the account years ago). I can't get my new password, therefore can't pay you guys.
I sent them a mean email that will hopefully result in my account being deleted, and I will try again later. However, can't you guys find anything other than paypal or do they really hold the market in online fund transactions?
6
atomofconsumptionJul 20, 2010
+91
is this a joke?
91
ClsjajllJul 20, 2010
+62
No, this is a joke:
Two carrots were crossing a street when one was hit by a car. Feeling bad, the healthy carrot visited his friend in the hospital. Inquiring, the doctor said there was good news and bad news.
"The good news is that your friend will be fine," the doctor said.
"That's great," the healthy carrot said emphatically, "whats the bad news?"
"Well," said the doctor crestfallen, "the bad news is your friend will be a vegetable the rest of his life."
62
Shamus_McNastyJul 20, 2010
+20
Why does Listnook Gold feel all bait-and-switchy to me now? I didn't know I was getting myself into a monthly subscription thing. I thought it was more of a PBS donation drive kind of thing.
20
Girm1987Jul 20, 2010
+15
I'm really not a fan of paying to use websites, and as such i will not be part of this Listnook Gold, i don't want this trend to escalate. Which it undoubtably will.
I think people should pay attention to the times website, since they introduced paying to view content there has been a 90% drop in traffic.
Don't make the same mistakes, no matter how good your intentions are.
15
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+97
Who wants to place a bet on how long it will be before non-Gold members start being disenfranchised and limited?
97
neshcomJul 20, 2010
+23
The free user experience *hasn't changed.* I can't imagine the way you interact with listnook on the free side to become worse than it is now. In fact, all of these new features seem to be Gold-first types of deal. I'd bet that you'll be seeing Friend With Benefits in a few months.
23
ani625Jul 20, 2010
+273
My opinion is that the pricing is pretty steep. (I don't earn in dollars)
273
elmuchoprezJul 20, 2010
+65
I agree. This really misses the mark.
$50/year is a fairly high subscription rate by web standards (outside of p***, which nobody pays for anymore), and the benefits of being a gold member are nice but hardly mind blowing. In fact, I doubt that the benefits would have any real impact on daily browsing experience.
If you're going to charge such a premium price, I think you have to offer something worth paying for.
On the other hand, I think you could keep the current offerings and drop the price to a more manageable $15-$20/year and attract a whole different crowd of people who are in it because they want to support listnook.
65
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+62
> outside of p***, which nobody pays for anymore
Last week I finally got a visa card instead of my banks own shit. I rejoiced, I could *finally* purchase p***! Not as a regular thing, but as a right of passage, taking me from child to man, I'm a **real man** finally. I'm c**** though, so I order the 1 day $1 trial. Transaction completes, I rejoice. I login to the site...
**wtf** my $1 trial is a PREVIEW OF THE SITE. No p***, just able to browse their archive. clicking download tells me I must pay $50 to subscribe to a "proper" account. So f*** paying for p***, never again. I will continue to stream in low quality, f*** you p*** sites, f*** you. I want my $1 back.
62
Flex-OJul 20, 2010
+20
Way to chump up becoming a man.
Nah I'm just kidding. That was an entertaining story.
20
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+22
I'm genuinely annoyed by it, I mean it was only $1 but the site never made it clear and I see all these p*** directors moaning about losing money to streaming, but when they pull shit like that I think they deserve it. Slimey cunts.
22
VA1NJul 20, 2010
+29
I agree. I love me some listnook, but subscription based services just isn't for me. A donation was nice, but I don't think I'm going to take part in the subscription service.
29
Locke005Jul 20, 2010
+5
I definitely agree. We should take a look at BoardGameGeek.com's system and do something similar. People earn site currency (geek gold) which they can use to purchase special microbadges that show up on their profile. You can also make a one time donation to receive a small amount of geek gold. The way most users get geek gold is by contributing to the site.
5
BannedINDCJul 20, 2010
+100
At 30 dollars a year, I'll have to wait until I get a job.
100
X-IstenceJul 20, 2010
+4
I paid my dues, paid for Listnook Gold and have yet to receive an email with instructions on how to activate my Listnook Gold.
I have forwarded my Paypal receipt to the email address listed in the paypal email, is there anything else I should be doing?
4
terriblecomicJul 20, 2010
+11
If only there was some other way to stop unwanted ads from appearing.
11
ClsjajllJul 20, 2010
+197
If Listnook were an independent enterprise, I might be tempted--to support the little guy, so to speak. Conde Naste is not a little guy.
I'll just hang out over here until I see what I get for free. Not ashamed to say so--just impractical to pay for the cow when you can get the steak for free.
Sucks to be Listnook.
197
NeoncowJul 20, 2010
+34
They're giving the steak and milk away for free (ads). Gold simply allows you to also name your cow and sort it.
Moo
34
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+15
Exactly, I'd be happy to pay the 30 bucks, or perhaps even more, if it were just going to a bunch of young geeks who made a cool website.
15
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+37
[deleted]
37
jojokoJul 20, 2010
+9
it works well enough for public radio and television. (seriously!)
and usually it involves merch for donating.
9
ChampingtonJul 20, 2010
+434
>(C'mon.. you waste a lot more more than $2.49 of your employer's time in just one hour browsing listnook.)
Joke's on you buddy, I'm not employed!...
*sigh*.
434
acydlordJul 20, 2010
+42
me neither, I just contributed to the national debt becoming a gold member.
42
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+1553
I have no problem making a one time payment/donation/whatever, but will not pay a monthly fee for services that I don't find particularly useful. Sorry.
1553
cirrus45Jul 20, 2010
+77
I agree, it has now become obvious that I was wrong to donate to listnook. Naysayers, I'm sorry for ignoring you.
77
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+603
[deleted]
603
bechusJul 20, 2010
+283
There are also chrome/firefox add ons that can already do all of this.
I don't want new features, I want the current ones to work. Get more servers and what not.
283
t3mp3stJul 20, 2010
+144
Our contributions were our votes for "I like listnook. Take some time and figure out a killer way of raising money."
This is, in some ways, a slap in the face. A monthly charge is unoriginal, nonfunctional, and obnoxious; it's only slightly less obvious than forcing massive advertisements down our throats. The whole thing stinks of Condé's meddling and we know it.
We asked you to think; to find something unique to listnook; to involve us in the process. As far as I can tell, nobody asked for monthly charges -- and bumping all of the inaugural members sure seems ungrateful (after all, you're the ones who "sold too low").
Unless you change directions very quickly, you'll be watching as the tide changes: my good feelings are gone and I'm *sure* I'm not alone.
Concrete suggestions -- yearly fees, ALL listnook gold members get the first year, f*** features until they're actually worthwhile, find a monetization path unique to listnook that enhances the community (sponsored links were a nice idea but you guys *failed* to iterate).
I'm very disappointed.
144
junkit33Jul 20, 2010
+448
This is precisely why many of us were skeptical of the whole "donation" thing. You just proved to Conde Nast that people are willing to pay for what used to be free. Now that Pandora's Box has been opened, Listnook is going to start leaning towards keeping its paying subscribers happy. To what extent remains to be seen, but there is no question that Listnook has officially begun a metamorphosis.
I certainly don't blame them for trying to run a solvent business, but all of you that "donated" in the name of generosity towards Listnook are basically *suckers*. And this subscription is what you get for it.
448
kaosjesterJul 20, 2010
+200
I think the people who really got suckered, honestly, are the ones who donated in advance. Now the accounts they thought they had bought have been issued an expiration date. Anyone who gave money to listnook in order to buy a 'gold account' now has to continue to pay or lose their status.
This is one of the rudest things I have ever seen a social networking site do, and I find it appalling that listnook admins would even suggest it. If they insist on the subscription model, people who donated before that should get to keep their accounts for a *lifetime*, because otherwise would be to *lie* to the people who gave them money.
200
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+43
They got my money at first, but I'm not forking over any more cash after they impose this stupid subscription service. All that does is promote segregation amongst the community, and the subscription payers are going to get a much better Listnook than the non-payers.
43
donkawechicoJul 20, 2010
+5
There was nothing even close to a "guarantee" with these donations. The admins were quite clear from the beginning that
>in exchange for subscribing to listnook, we can right now only offer you our undying gratitude and an optional trophy on your userpage.
I get to keep my trophy for a lifetime. They're living up to their end of the bargain. (Not to mention you could donate literally any amount to get these benefits).
Yes, they hinted at giving useful features to subscribers in the future, but anyone who donated with the expectation of getting features, or a lifetime subscription, did so under their own delusions.
5
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+257
I donated and I unfortunately must admit that you are correct and I am a sucker.
257
iobserverJul 20, 2010
+54
I am broke and have been without a job for a considerable time period. Yet, I was willing to make a wholehearted contribution once I had some. Just for now, a token of appreciation was under way, and this thing happens. Don't know how to react. It feels like Listnook is not the same that I have known all this time. In fact, now I fear it is trying to sideline some of the passive and financially non-contributing members. I have mixed emotions for this new project. Just like a freshly deserted conscientious lover I would wish Listnook a good luck.
54
AngelaMotormanJul 20, 2010
+10
>I am broke and have been without a job for a considerable time period. Yet, I was willing to make a wholehearted contribution once I had some. Just for now, a token of appreciation was under way, and this thing happens.
I could have written this -- I was just about to mail a (literal) token because I don't have money for boots, much less anything else. I love listnook, and try hard to contribute meaningful content. Today's decision is wrong not because the features offered are not worth the money, but because it *creates two classes of users based on access to capital*. Doing so in the middle of an economic depression, esp. given the cicumstance that the listnook community is such an obviously committed group of inventive, intellectually resourceful people, is both morally wrong and strategically wrongheaded.
Admins: you probably can guess what the "press" on this will look like. But have you thought about what could happen if you admitted this is a mistake, and reversed the decision?
At the very least, consider creating a subsidy for listnookors who have demonstrated their worth to the community. If you're afraid to make such subjective decisions, let users collectively determine criteria and administer the selection process for this. If listnook can do all sorts of other collaborative projects, why not let us create a structure that helps keep this place alive *and fair*?
10
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+64
[removed]
64
BillBrasky_Jul 20, 2010
+14
I thought if i gave it to him he might go away.
14
evanvolmJul 20, 2010
+16
The donation was precisely that, a donation. I sent them a few bucks to help them out, even though it wasn't a shitload of cash. I view the initial payment as nothing more. The subscription is voluntary, one which I won't be participating in because of the (current) top comment.
I have no problem giving them a one time donation. Requiring me to, especially with 'features' that don't interest me at all? No thanks. So, I don't think I was suckered. Those who choose to subscribe to the new payment method, however...
16
kaosjesterJul 20, 2010
+27
I'm in the same boat. I had been debating throwing down for a gold account for about a week, and now I'm glad I didn't. Sorry, Listnook. I can get a full subscription to SomethingAwful for a one-time $10 fee, and it's about as amusing as listnook (if significantly more immature).
27
bhuppzJul 20, 2010
+157
I am afraid .. Listnook might not the same again .. ever
I donated too .. and will donate again if required but I don't want the Listnook Gold membership .. All features should be available to everyone .. everyone is equal .. I guess that is the whole point ..
Why cant it be like Wikipedia .. they take donations but they are not charging people for information ..
157
invisishanJul 20, 2010
+17
I think the donation model (ala NPR, Wikipedia) is a potentially good model that hasn't been tried enough on the web. It will fit in with this audience's values better. Granted - it will be like herding cats once or twice a year when you have to do the donation drive, but I think there is real potential there. A graph on the right side of the page with "so far we have reached $xxx of our $yyy goal", and listnook could still offer rewards to people who donate, just like they did with Listnook gold (or maybe even more so - various levels of rewards including listnook stickers, t-shirts etc for the higher donations). Seems promising.
17
HateToSayItButJul 20, 2010
+42
> Why cant it be like Wikipedia
Believe it or not, people find Wikipedia more valuable and it receives more donations than Listnook ever will.
42
bhuppzJul 20, 2010
+52
I wish Listnook was never bought by Condé Nast. People will feel much more comfortable donating for Listnook if it was not owned by a big corporation.
52
bechusJul 20, 2010
+136
New listnook gold feature: Comments are not interrupted by random ellipses.
136
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+194
I completely agree. I feel a little cheated that I made a one time payment and now it's a monthly thing.
EDIT: No, actually I feel incredibly cheated. It was like "help poor listnook out" now it's more like "listnook wants monies now please".
194
nifocJul 20, 2010
+69
This is exactly how I feel. I donated because I use this site so much and wanted to help them out, but a monthly fee is just greedy.
I guess I am a sucker.
69
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+151
I agree. I paid 5 bucks to metafilter 4 years ago and I've never been asked for another thing from them. I like this site but a subscription fee seems more than a little greedy to me.
151
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+90
I completely agree, I thought they were going to say those who donated before there were any features would have a lifetime Gold Account but was shocked when they still asked us to pay up.
90
rhs856Jul 20, 2010
+24
I (naively in hindsight, I suppose) thought this too. They lose out on 9000 subscriptions, but show those 9000 people appreciation for supporting gold before anything was added on.
24
bechusJul 20, 2010
+68
A one-time fee would be *much* better.
68
efoxJul 20, 2010
+49
Agreed. Subscriptions are generally silly, and the new features aren't anything special. Putting a "Donate" button somewhere visible on the site would work a lot better than a subscription Listnook Gold.
49
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+47
Prepare the ships. Listnook may be sinking.
Yes I'm a sucker that donated. The devs were calling for a funding boost. Now that they want to turn that into a permanent revenue stream I'm out.
47
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+35
Ditto. If I wanted to subscribe to something it would be an organization that actually produces news.
35
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+12
I don't have a regular income as a student. I just spare money when I can. This is annoying for me.
12
djepikJul 20, 2010
+32
The only feature I want it to be able to subscribe to a twitter feed where you guys update how site repairs are going when the site goes down. ie.
2:00 - damn, site's down
2:30 - We have located bacon bits stuck in one of the servers
2:40 - Cleaning has commenced
2:50 - Cleaning finished, putting site back up
2:55 - Everything is running, investigation into source of bacon bits is underway
32
Supervisor194Jul 20, 2010
+12
Just posting my two cents in the maelstrom: I really can't believe that this is the dumb shit you guys came up with. Creating a recurring fee system now before you have even implemented any truly useful changes really boggles the mind. I can't imagine what you could do to listnook that would make me (or anyone) want to pay you forty bucks a year for it.
There's too much free content out there for you guys to think you can actually make this work, especially considering the economy. One-time donations, or hell, even annual pledge drives for access to special features is one thing - but a fixed-price subscription? Totally another. Sorry, gentlemen, a link aggregator heavy on emo bullshit from its mostly twentysomething userbase is not taking recurring fees out of my ass so I can sit in a special forum and act like it's the seventeenth century. Go ahead and take away my gold features when my donation runs dry, I won't re-up on any subscription basis.
Thanks for the trophy though.
12
xieishJul 20, 2010
+20
A yearly subscription for what amounts to almost **nothing** at all is not something I am willing to pay. I spend hours of time on Listnook each week, but don't have a single friend in my list. I don't give a hoot about what comments of mine are popular. That's now how I use listnook, and I suspect the majority of the 8m active users are far more like me than the social butterflies on the site.
In fact, the profile sorting seems to benefit the spammers more than the regular users, since it allows them to run better analysis on their posts. I just don't know what you're charging for. None of these features really make the listnook experience faster, easier, better, etc.
Nothing here justifies a monthly payment, sorry.
20
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+57
[deleted]
57
rhartmanJul 20, 2010
+5
I can't help but believe that some of the ramifications of turning Listnook even partially into a pay-site have not been thought through. The idea of a divided community has been hammered repeatedly, but the biggest ones havn't been brought up yet.
Listnook drives traffic by serving up content from other providers.
* Certain publications (NYTimes, or anything Murdoch for example) take a real dim view other sites driving traffic with _their_ content. How long will it take before Listnook is misconstrued as selling that content?
* Then there are other issues that could arise as well. For example, Listnook links to a ton of articles and pictures involving drugs, p***, and other material that could be considered illicit or immoral, depending on where you live. Again, once Listnook is misconstrued as charging for access to that stuff, it opens them up to legal challenges.
* And finally there's the moral issues behind it as well. I personally have no problems with any of the content on this site - if I don't like it I don't read it - but when you subscribe, you are supporting EVERY sublistnook and it's related content. That also is not going to sit well with some folks.
Again, none of these points reflect my personal views on the matter but they do warrant discussion as legitimate concerns.
Edit: Grammar corrections.
5
ManEggsJul 20, 2010
+671
I liked Listnook Gold before because instead of actual features I could just feel more important than everyone else.
671
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+392
Have you read Predictably Irrational? If you buy Dan Ariely's arguments, then I am afraid the admins have changed the nature of our relationship to listnook from a social one (i.e. pay money to listnook, feel good about it) to a monetary one (i.e pay money to listnook, feel like you are not getting your money's worth).
392
neoabraxasJul 20, 2010
+48
Right on. This is like with that Israeli daycare where parents were punished with a small amount of money for a late pickup of their child. This turned the whole late arrival issue from a rude behavior to a service you pay for. In the end more parents ended up picking up their kids late after the monetary fine was introduced. What's even more paradoxical is that even after the late fee was canceled the rate of late pickups did not drop correspondingly. The human relation between parents and caregivers had already been altered from a social contract to a monetary one.
48
TheMemoJul 20, 2010
+76
I was planning on donating to listnook when a few cheques cleared this month. Donating. Not paying for. **Donating.** I don't want listnook gold, I don't want new features. I don't want to be smugly superior to the plebs, I just wanted to help.
However, now it feels like I'd be paying for a service (and, after about 5:30pm here in the UK, I usually can't access listnook because it's too busy, unless I log out), so f*** it.
Ask for donations, by all means. Don't ask me to *pay* for additions to a service that I can't even use after 5:30 / 6:00pm BST.
76
ZorbaTHutJul 20, 2010
+86
Yeah, ironically I was fine just handing Listnook money, but now I'm thinking "hmm, is $3.99/month worth it? I'm just not sure."
I hate to say it, but while I probably would have donated $5 every few months for quite a while, I'm probably not going to be subscribing.
86
killerstormJul 20, 2010
+65
I think it would be better to make it two separate things -- say, listnook gold is for those who want to donate (and it gives only badge) and listnook premium is subscription which adds features.
This way **both** social and monetary relationships can be milked.
65
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+20
[deleted]
20
taejoJul 20, 2010
+13
A dollar a week averages out to $4.35 a month (there are more than four weeks in every month except February).
13
emkatJul 20, 2010
+18
Exactly. And the Admins will have to make more features to try to make it worthwhile, which will increase grumbling from non-subscribers and subscribers who now feel they are entitled to more.
18
ani625Jul 20, 2010
+148
So basically, like prostitutes.
148
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+184
[deleted]
184
RaynbJul 20, 2010
+97
You should teach political science. ... or economics, the class about capitalism. Whatever. F*** this comment.
97
DutchangleJul 20, 2010
+33
I was really enjoying your comment and was about to upvote it, when I read those last 3 words.
The sex was good, but as always, I'm going to have to sever all ties and downvote you now.
33
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+58
[deleted]
58
future_popeJul 20, 2010
+29
Me too. I used to compare myself to others through our differences in karma and years on listnook, but now that *I'm a listnook gold charter member*, I get to feel superior to all the peons who toil around me for mere karma.
I imagine this is how slave owners felt.
29
BrentasticJul 20, 2010
+27
I had no issue making a one-time donation to help out, but a monthly subscription seems like a rather off-putting method of generating revenue.
27
powercowJul 20, 2010
+4
I made a one time donation to a site that gives me much join, even though it is owned by a massive media company. because I understand how they fund things.
Listnook and the like are already going to start to have problems with the pay walls around the net.
America already pays ten times or more than the rest of the planet on the net, we dont want to be nicked and dimmed to death.
Everyonce in a while, i dont mind making a donation(heck I even turned off adblock for no other site on the net but listnook). But I feel it is a bit deceptive, to change the one time call for money into a subscription service. And very un-listnook. The more commercial this place will feel,The less I will feel like the resident of a community and the more I will feel like the sucker of a commercial enterprise designed to maximize the amount of money they get from me while providing as little as possible.
PS, i could care less about karma sorting or really much about karma. It just makes people not say how they feel.
SO IMO screw listnook gold and you can take back my "trophy" if you want, I thought i was helping some struggling listnookors, not creating a business model for a corp.
4
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+30
Listnook is profitable enough to pay its staff, and if Conde Nast were to sell Listnook, they would get several million dollars for the site. The funny thing is that this value comes from us, the users that submit the content. *We* are the ones that should be pay by Listnook and not the other way around! We *are* already paying with the content we submit. We made this website be worth millions... and they expect not only that we submit the content and moderate the sublistnooks but also to pay money? Welcome to the Web 3.0.
30
tchochyJul 20, 2010
+26
Rather than a monthly fee wouldn't it be easier to just lead an annual pledge drive like wikipedia or public broadcasting does? You could even get listnook celebrities behind it making youtube videos encouraging people to donate. Just sayin'.
26
ZulbanJul 20, 2010
+5
Absolutely. In the year 2010, people are starting to have a lot of negative associations with monthly fees. Monthly fees are becoming the devil. Psychologically, it feels like you're chaining yourself down to *have* to donate every month, instead of feeling good about choosing to donate in a quarterly or yearly drive. We might find that people are more charitable when they're not afraid of a monthly fee.
5
tyeh26Jul 20, 2010
+130
Pandora $36 a year and I get some good music, Listnook $30 a year and I get to write down notes about my friends.
130
yellowfish04Jul 20, 2010
+78
Although 95% of both Pandora and listnook are fully functional without paying a dime.
78
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+53
I think he's trying to say he wants listnook to have a 40 hour/month time limit. /s
53
worsethantoolateJul 20, 2010
+10
> ..Listnook $30 a year and I get to *help it survive, or prevent it from becoming Digg (or Wired, or worse).*
FTFY.
I don't get you guys. For most of you $30/year means nothing.. and even if it does, just *donate* $10 or whatever. It's not about the extra features, most of us won't even use them anyway. It's been just about rich jokes and upyachts till now for a reason...
This is a huge site, and lately the fact that it isn't making enough money [to be kept as it is](http://www.listnook.com/r/announcements/comments/cnth8/making_ends_meet_tldr_remember_that_joke_about/c0twdbk) has been relied to us . I'm sure that Conde Nast, though, could surely find a thousand ways to monetize this place, but none of us would probably like any of them.
Would you be complaining as you do now if listnook still were entirely in its creators hands? I guess you wouldn't. But that situation was economically unsustainable a long time ago, wasn't it? Have things since changed in terms of censorship, editorializing, transparency..? If you think they haven't, then just think of Conde Nast as a benefactor (a dormant, evil one if you want).
Also in this particular case, I don't think the Eternal September argument really applies.
10
barnard33Jul 20, 2010
+34
I like listnook but don't see myself paying $30 a year. Enjoy my one time donation though.
34
t0phuxJul 20, 2010
+25
I thought listnook gold was a joke? It was a joke of what couldn't possibly come, but no more than 6 months later, here it is staring us in the face. Doesn't everyone remember how we watched all those funny listnook gold submissions flow in (blocked access, your not a listnook gold member when you tried to look at a submission called "Funniest picture EVAR!")?
listnook gold was cool (and funny/hip) since you basically said, donate what you want, and you can have access, but as a subscription model, with no *real* benefits you basically slapped us all in the face.
How far are you going to take this?
25
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+11
Shit hits the fan, listnook needs a helping hand? Sure. Happy to.
Subscription & monthly fees? Meh. Please try again, Listnook - this is not the feature set we're looking for.
Thanks, a listnook-gold-charter-member who will never sign up for this service.
11
fissionchipsJul 20, 2010
+7
okay, so downvote me all you want, but this seems a poor deal. Like the guy with the FPP says, I feel great when I'm just giving away $20 cash to Listnook, but when I see the feature set they're trying to sell for $3.99 a month, I don't see the value.
Hopefully I'm in the minority.
7
bhuppzJul 20, 2010
+124
Is there a way to unsubscribe Listnook Gold?
I want to be a regular Listnookor
124
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+29
[deleted]
29
lolbaconJul 20, 2010
+77
You should have listnook play a nonstop vuvuzela sound, then implement a Gold member feature that disables it.
77
CornFedHonkyJul 20, 2010
+4
Honestly, I'm pretty upset that it was kept a big secret how much Listnook Gold actually generated. It makes you seem way too corporate, I don't like it, and quit honestly I kind of felt taken. The lounge is cool and all, but I feel like you guys called us to arms and asked for help, we responded, and we never even got to see how good we did. Pretty lame if you ask me. I live and bleed orangered, but that left a pretty bad taste in my mouth and I probably won't be subscribing to Listnook Gold because of it.
If we are going to be open and honest amongst users and admins, something most sites don't do, we should **be** open and honest. That's just one humble man's opinion. I could be wrong.
4
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+4
Say, would you crackers like to hear about the time we visited listnook.com?
*No, that's okay...*
Ooh! It must've been about four, five years ago. Me and the little lady was sittin' on the couch you see, all alone at night, when all of a sudden this new news aggregate website, from the web 2.0 era, comes out of the internet!
*We was so scared, Lord have mercy, I jumped up off the couch and I said "Thomas, what on earth is that website?!"*
That alien was staring at us, looking down with these big orangered eyes...
*Oh it was so scary!*
And I yelled, I said "What do you want from us monster?!" And the monster bent down and said "I need about treefiddy"
*What's treefiddy?*
Three dollars and fifty cents
*He wanted money?*
That's right. I said "I ain't giving you no treefiddy listnook! Get your own goddam money!"
*I gave him a dollar*
She gave him a dollar
*I thought he'd go away if I gave him a dollar*
Well of course he's not gonna go away! You gave him a dollar, he's gonna assume you got more
4
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+152
I was thinking more like $10 per year... but that's just me.
152
MitsuhoJul 20, 2010
+57
Where do we track how many months of Gold we have left?
57
jubaljJul 20, 2010
+11
and if you bought the annual subscription at the special rate now will it tag it on for a year after the subscription runs out?
does it also mean i can buy 2years worth of subscrption at the same time or do i have to wait till my subscription is expiring?
edit:spelling
11
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+8
Users will not pay for the content they generate.
Users will not generate content so other people get rich off their efforts by making others pay for what users give for free.
The more your users give the less your corporate masters will understand when the users stop giving.
Start the egg timer on when the plug gets pulled.
8
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+45
Give us @listnook email addresses! Just let us forward them elsewhere. I would pay $30/year for that alone.
45
t0phuxJul 20, 2010
+7
This would be awesome. This is one of the only features that I would actually pay money for.
7
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+228
[deleted]
228
bexterJul 20, 2010
+36
I agree, I'd pay that, and I think a lot more people would. I don't want to pay monthly.
36
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+169
Sweet! Best $0.01 I've ever donated via Paypal!
169
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+39
[deleted]
39
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+3
Is there anything wrong with a good old fashioned donation drive ala PBS? These drives have proven to work well for websites and act as barn-raising comraderie moments. Two textbook examples: one is the kind used by politial campaigns. The second is the humble indie bundle. For listnook, the prize might be some nice swag (exclusive t-shirts, buttons, a special poster signed by the listnook crew, soap, tie-in products from members in the community, etc).
Also, instead of looking at monthly payments (the cup half empty), rewards should be looked into (the cup half full) -- like a sam's club for listnook members. Moving this kind of advertising off-site would be a nice work around with issues like adblocker. When people head to listnook, they aren't usually looking to buy products. Purchasing has to be placed in a communty context -- like the purchase of listnook soap. Another more generalized method is a listnook credit card reward program -- albeit this isn't the best time for that. Perhaps a simpler reward program can be arranged with Paypal.
**Edit:** Another thing, if you have to come to the community to increase your revenue -- when Conde Nast isn't offering any help financially (and it's an old media company anyway) *it's time to ditch Conde Nast*. It was an oil-water relationship to begin with.
3
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+15
It's pretty obvious that this is the start of the long road to ruin.
15
arronskyJul 20, 2010
+5
Meh. I think the leap from a one-time payment to a monthly/yearly subscription is a big one. See how this plays out, but in time you should provide one more tiered category that does not require a subscription (in other words, I can make a one-time payment for a month without having to set up a subscription that I then have to remember to cancel, which I won't-- wait a min...)
5
monsieurleeJul 20, 2010
+4
I hate paying for shit monthly. How about an option for a lifetime sub for a certain amount, say, $100 one time fee (Or whatever you guys think). Back in the day I bought a lifetime account on LiveJournal for $100 and I love the fact that I don't ever think about it again. I don't feel like I have to use it now that I paid for that month. I can use or not use it as I please.
This is why I hate MMOs. I hate paying a monthly feel and then feel that I have to play as much as possible to get my money's worth. Give me a $xxx lifetime option, and once the money is out of my pocket I don't ever think about it anymore.
4
Psy-KoshJul 21, 2010
+3
So here's the way I see it: I made a donation, got a trophy + plausibly deniable access to a hypothetical club that may or may not exist.
Today, I find out that _in addition to that_, I get access to a few bonus (and unimportant) features which I'll only have temporary access too unless I continue to pay.
Does it feel a bit like I was tricked? Initially. _HOWEVER_, I know enough to not totally trust such feelings. I know enough to know that our minds have all sorts of [interesting behaviors](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases), so upon more precise consideration, I note the following: Pretty much everything I gained when I first donated, I get to keep permanently. The only thing that's temporary/subscription based is the extra new stuff from today.
I guess, arguably, the only thing that could be said to have been lost is, how shall I put this, pre the new subscription thing, I had permanent access to the "top tier of stuff available for listnook users"... but now more stuff was added, and the new new stuff I don't necessarily have permanent access to. It's not that I've really lost anything, though.
So, anyways, that's my thoughts on this. (In other words, I'm _not_ currently actually upset or anything about the new subscription model)
3
colusitoJul 20, 2010
+9
This is bullshit man, the most important part of listnook it's its comunity and now you are telling me that some users are more important than others because they have money? All of us make this site, you guys are getting paid because of our posts and our submissions.
Also this has proven how lazy you are, sorting your comments has been asked to return forever, and now when there's money involved you cook it up in a week?
9
flamyngoJul 20, 2010
+10
Screw you, listnook. I donated because I believe in your product--now you're telling me I was an experiment to test out how well a subscription service would work?
I am totally disappointed in you guys right now. You should be embarrassed for using your loyal members like this.
10
elmariachi304Jul 20, 2010
+5
You had me get my credit card out for nothing-- once I saw you guys were dictating how much we had to give, and made it a recurring thing, I wasn't interested any more. You might have gotten a few bucks from folks like me who can't afford to make a monthly donation. I feel like this is a bad policy if you're trying to tap into our goodwill for the site.
5
icallshenannigansJul 20, 2010
+9
Dudes really... Why the f*** are the users, the people who post and comment thereby *creating* the value of the f****** site paying and not the owners of the sites that are linked to, that are earning ad revenue for those page views?
Retarded, just totally damn retarded.
9
ciaran036Jul 20, 2010
+18
Those who, like myself, don't want to fork out cash for Listnook Gold, should prepare themselves for more advertisements.
If we're not paying, then we shouldn't mind more advertisements on Listnook.
I especially don't mind if they are advertisements relevant to my interests.
At the end of the day, a site like Listnook can't get any better without either a subscription service or advertisements, or a combination of both.
I mean, I'd easily fork out money for magazines and newspapers. At the current moment in time, the benefits of Listnook Gold do not appeal to me, however I like Listnook. And since I want Listnook to continue to exist, then I have to accept more ads appearing on Listnook pages.
18
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+5
Look at the "pay-what-you-want" bundle and see the success of that. The first idea was good when you could donate what you wanted and get a little trophy, sure some people sent in $0.01 but that doesn't matter, most people sent in a decent amount of money. This monthly-payment thing is bullshit and it's getting ridiculous sorry.
5
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+7
There's absolutely no reason to pay to use a website that aggregates content from other sites - most of which I already visit regularly. Listnook is basically Google Reader with a more elaborate voting system and user community.
7
thoraxJul 20, 2010
+8
I'm just glad they made gold-only comme**✘ [Sorry. The rest of this comment is only available to Listnook Gold subscribers.](http://www.listnook.com/r/lounge/comments/crsk5/restricted_listnook_gold_required_to_read_this/) **.
8
trukinJul 20, 2010
+346
/r/frugal won't like this
346
JestersimonJul 20, 2010
+133
Eventually, Listnook will offer coupons as some sort of promotion.
/r/frugal will go go nuts.
133
kelly2thecJul 20, 2010
+12
Hey, man, we just like coupons okay. There's nothing wrong with that. We can quit using coupons any time we want. You hear that? Any time we want!
You got me all a-twitter, now. I could really use a coupon.
12
gfixlerJul 21, 2010
+10
┌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┐
╎ FREE BREAST EXAMINATION ╎
╎ -women of listnook only- ╎
╎ redeemable at: ╎
╎ gfixler's house ╎
╎ c o n f i d e n t i a l ╎
╎ *coupon not necessary* ╎
╎ just come over whenever ╎
└╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌╌┘
10
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+14
[deleted]
14
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+253
That's it, I'm torrenting Listnook.
253
[deleted]Jul 20, 2010
+100
[deleted]
100
pigferretJul 20, 2010
+10
You wouldn't steal a Listnook. And then steal its helmet. You wouldn't go to the toilet in its helmet. And then send it to the Listnook's grieving widow. And then steal it again!
10
cr0ntabJul 20, 2010
+111
F*** you. I would if I could.
111
High2plus3Jul 21, 2010
+19
[But you can!](http://code.listnook.com/)
19
mrchessJul 20, 2010
+8
If I knew listnook gold would turn into a monthly pay scheme I wouldn't have donated in the first place.
8
rockswellJul 20, 2010
+7
Same ol same ol. Nice small company gets munched up by bigger fish, then said fish force original "friendly faces" of listnook into coming up with an "idea" like subscription. Such bullshit. Some c*** in a suit at Condé saying stuff like, "We have to monetize the userbase and content."
7
elbrianJul 20, 2010
+19
When I go into my prefs and disable the ads, then click the submit button- it does not save the change.
IE- I disable the ads, then go back into my prefs and they are back to checked.
19
Hitokiri03Jul 20, 2010
+3
I joined listnook because a friend of mine loved the community so much. I now spend quite a bit of time on here and really like it. I hate the idea of paying for listnook. Having a class system, essentially, will ruin this site. I am glad to see the the community as a whole is against this idea. That makes me like this place even more. Thank you listnook, for banding together against the idea for a listnook that costs money.
198 Comments