The show is "pull yourself up by the bootstraps propaganda. it presents a highly selective, sentimental version of frontier life that leaves out a lot of conflict and complexity.
policies like the Homestead Act of 1862 encouraged settlers to move west by offering land, but that land was not empty. It was already inhabited by Native nations, many of whom were forcibly and violently removed through treaties, military action, or coercion. The show largely avoids this reality. The show treats Native Americans as background figures and not as central actors with their own perspectives and rights. . Other groups—Native Americans, Black settlers, immigrants—are underrepresented or portrayed in limited ways, which reinforces a narrow view of history.
The series emphasizes self-reliance and moral virtue—families surviving through hard work and determination. But historically, white settlers depended on government support (like land grants, railroads, and military protection), as well as on neighbors and community networks. Survival on the frontier was rarely an individual effort; it was collective and heavily subsidized by taxpayers.
The show also tends to sanitize hardship. crop failures, illness, poverty—it frames these struggles as ultimately uplifting and solvable through perseverance.
were there no harsher outcomes like frequent deaths? displacement? and economic instability? that didn’t always resolve neatly
It is based on a series of children's books written about the author's life. It was never meant to be a documentary, and the author and most of the people written about in the books weren't looking at the world the way we do now.
21
aWAGaMuffin14 hr ago
-3
Phhht. It's libertarian propaganda cowritten by one of the founders of the movement.
-3
ShawnaLanne12 hr ago
-1
And it was sanitized to an inch of it's life. Let's not forget the original Little House on the Prarie printing included the following dehumanizing line about the territory, "there were no people. Only Indians lived there" with multiple 'characters' saying "the only good Indian is a dead indian."
There's mention of blackface and I'm pretty positive if Laura had come across any other people she considered 'other' in her colonizer way, she would have been equally as awful. It's so bad that in 2018 The Laura Ingalls Wilder Award dropped her name all together and renamed itself as the "Children's Literature Legacy Award."
And before anyone mentions it was a different time, the show itself would have scoffed at this. Things are either good or bad in the Little House universe. There's no room for grey and no excuses. It's a very libertarian take on things.
But there are so many more layers to it.
I'd argue that it was as much a reaction against the Women's Liberation movement and the ERA. The show removing much of Ma Ingalls portrayal as a partner in survival to a domestic all mother sort of figure to harken back to a more "traditional time." Which is super ironic because they had to go away from what was portrayed in their source material to do so. Ma, was there to support and keep everything tidy, smile pretty, look worried, and admire Pa - only rarely stepping out of her domestic role on the show.
Now this was also prompted I'm sure by back of the house maneuvering, as Karen Grassle, the actress who played Ma Ingels, was left to her domestic role on screen after having the audacity to ask for a raise once the show became successful.
And all of these inclusions, exclusions were deliberate choices. If you've ever tried adapting a movie from a book you'd know how deliberate the thread needs to be kept and the scenes and dialogue included to keep the story momentum moving in the direction you want it to. It's so hard to keep the important bits intact that this kind of structural change was a deliberate choice.
But there's one aspect you need to take into account. The Michael Landon effect. He was well known and loved by the public after his role on Bonaza, a cultural phenomena itself. The public was invested in him and God, he was a beautiful man with charisma that translated well on TV screens. And he knew this. Dude I cried when he died.
He was the executive producer of Little House on the Prarie and he was the driving force behind it all, and while the show often played lip service to issues of sexism and racism with overly sentimental morality plays each week, behind the scenes, and its widely documented by everyone who has written about the show - both his admirers and others - it t was very much a boy's club. Beyond the crude jokes, the truely draconian work environment, and the day drinking, there was blatent sexism and cruelty that he could display to both men and women, but seemed to aim at women more often.
Michael Landon had to make sure she knew her place.
I will add I loved this show as a kid and had the biggest little girl crush on Landon. But this was propaganda on many levels. Not only those issues mentioned above, but also, I think as a continued response to McCarthyism.. Michael Landon (born Eli Maurice Orowitz and convinced early in his career to change his name) came from a family that was both Irish Catholic and Jewish. And from all accounts identified strongly with his Jewis roots. Putting this kind of show on air; one that leaned so far into American propaganda and nostalgia - would likely have been in an effort, either unconscious or conscious - and I would argue conscious because Landon was brilliant in that way, to declare his patriotism in a hugely public way.
If you're interested there are several memoirs from some main actors on the show, Little bit, Nellie, and Ma most notably.
-1
legsjohnson14 hr ago
+21
"why was this TV adaptation of a book not about something else instead?"
21
OreoSpeedwaggon14 hr ago
+15
Careful to not cut yourself on that edge, ChatGPT.
15
UHeardAboutPluto14 hr ago
+8
Why now, and not 50 years ago?
8
Darklord_Bravo14 hr ago
+8
Settle down bot.
8
Bone_Breaker014 hr ago
+9
Who f****** cares?
9
keving8711 hr ago
-1
aka Little House on the Who Gives a Fuckairie
-1
ReagenLamborghini14 hr ago
+10
Imagine being this insufferable
10
jgmu1714 hr ago
+22
It's a weeknight tv series, not a documentary
22
Witchazeljb14 hr ago
+2
Thank you.
2
drainfrog_9214 hr ago
-4
Totally, but weeknight TV also ends up being a lot of people’s “history class.” It’s fair to enjoy the show and still poke at what it leaves out. Maybe pair it with a podcast.
-4
QueblyJonesIII12 hr ago
+1
Do you like boardgames, Europe, and the NFL? You may be entitled to compensation! Just call 1-800-IAM-ABOT to be connected with our team of legal professionals!
1
meatballsandlingon212 hr ago
+1
I think I’d enjoy a LHotP-podcast like that, especially now that “Jay and Miles X-Plain the X-Men” is announced to end soon.
1
Ok-Character-377914 hr ago
+9
I'm guessing this is a bot account based on the posted numbers. But the history of how uber libertarian Rose Wilder Lane helped Laura Ingalls Wilder modify her memoirs for publication during the 30s is fascinating.
In other words, this has nothing to do with the TV show and everything to do with the books it's based on.
9
JulianVanderbilt14 hr ago
+10
lol what an insane bot thing to post.
Yeah buddy. Also were lower-class hyper rural families adopting kids left and right despite economic destitution? Did that trigger your unreality radar at all?
10
Weak_Aside381314 hr ago
+1
definitely this bugged me too when rewatching as adult. The adoption thing was so unrealistic - like these families are barely scraping by but somehow taking in every orphan that shows up? My grandmother grew up in similar time and she always said most families could barely feed their own kids let alone extras
The whole show is basically comfort food TV that makes people feel good about "simpler times" that never really existed the way they show it. Real frontier life was brutal and most people died young from diseases or accidents. But showing Laura getting typhoid and actually dying wouldn't make for great family viewing I guess
What really gets me is how they make it seem like if you just work hard enough everything works out fine. Meanwhile in reality entire families would starve when crops failed and there wasn't much you could do about it except hope neighbors helped or government stepped in
1
TerribleAntelope613413 hr ago
+2
Sir, this is a Wendy's.
2
longjumpingtote12 hr ago
+2
Not every show is about having characters with modern sensibilities.
> The show treats Native Americans as background figures and not as central actors
Because that's not what the show is about. It's a show about family dynamics in a different era. You can't squeeze every topic into shows, it's like complaining that Breaking Bad didn't spend more time with the police and with addicts to get both of those groups' perspectives, and didn't discuss the changing drug laws during that time.
2
RockyDify14 hr ago
+4
Is it because it’s just a kids show?
4
_Goose_14 hr ago
+3
If it is propaganda then whatever. Censoring it because you don’t like propaganda is still censorship. And all censorship is bad. Even if it’s for the good.
24 Comments