· 161 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 2, 2026 at 2:35 PM

LIV Golf to lose investment from Saudi Arabia, fund says

Posted by AudibleNod


LIV Golf to lose investment from Saudi Arabia, fund says
ABC News
LIV Golf to lose investment from Saudi Arabia, fund says
LIV Golf, a Saudi-backed men's professional golf league, has lost funding from the Saudi Public Investment Fund.

🚩 Report this post

161 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
KimJongFunk May 2, 2026 +897
Can someone with knowledge of golf explain what might happen now? I know that some of the players traded in their existing contracts to switch to LIV, but did they blacklist themselves in the process?
897
This_Tip717 May 2, 2026 +669
Alot of them got paid from LIV more than they could expect by grinding it out on the PGA tour.  PGA have a "one time" opportunity this year for Brooks Koepka to return, but I would be surprised if they don't find a way to bring at least Rahm back. Old guys like Sergio, Phil are probably done.
669
stamatt45 May 2, 2026 +323
The one-time opportunity earlier this year was open to multiple golfers, Koepka was just the only one to take it
323
This_Tip717 May 2, 2026 +246
Patrick Reed too but the less we mention him, the more the Earth heals.
246
kc_cyclone May 2, 2026 +116
My favorite golf memory isn't a round I played but a shot I watched in person at the Charles Schwab Challenge several years ago. Reed yanked one on a short par 3 that had a grand stand behind the green. This was at the height of everyone hating for cheating and gaslighting about it. Loud cheers for the terrible shot and a dude walking by us just yelled "Suck a fat one, Patty"
116
Longjumping_Attempt May 2, 2026 +64
Reed was not included in the PGA tours offer to return. The only ones who qualified were Rahm, Dechambeau, Cam Smith, and Kopeka off the top of my head. Reed decided not to renew his LIV contract and started playing on the DP tour. He has not played in a PGA event since leaving LIV.
64
CerealSpiller22 May 2, 2026 +15
Unfortunately, you just dinged Mother Earth 😄
15
daemonescanem May 2, 2026 +73
Mickelson made $96 million before LIV. Rahm $50 million DeChambeau $44 million Johnson $76 million Watson $49 million Koepka $38 million Garcia $55 million 7 guys with combined net worth of 408 million before LIV. Seems like they were already doing pretty damn good.
73
samtdzn_pokemon May 2, 2026 +79
Phil was also $100M in gambling debt at one point. He's an absolute gambling addict the same way Michael Jordan is.
79
daemonescanem May 2, 2026 +23
Rumored to have 100m in gambling debt.
23
06_TBSS May 3, 2026 +9
That's what pissed me off about the folks who were saying, "well, if another company offered you a lot more money, you'd go." These guys already have generational wealth. Their lives were largely unimpacted by the additional money they received. The vast majority of us are not and likely will not ever be in that position. You can't compare their decision to middle class folks getting a $10k raise.
9
DlucinatedHlucinatic May 2, 2026 +69
F*** Phil Mickelson total dickface
69
Certain_Luck_8266 May 2, 2026 +13
They want to get Bryson back...if only for his social media presence, but there really might not be a path.
13
daroach1414 May 3, 2026 +5
There is always a path if the pga wants him
5
rir2 May 3, 2026 +1
Done but immensely richer for the experience.
1
jebei May 2, 2026 +697
They let Brooks Koepke come back a few years ago but with a fine that cost him around $50+ million to rejoin. I don't blame the PGA - these players tried to kill the tour. The golfers of the PGA surely won't welcome any of them back -- the people who left took huge bribes and now that it didn't work the 54 players on the LIV tour would be trying to take a livelihood of one of the 125 loyal players who stayed on the active tour. From what I understand Phil Mickelson has been told not to bother. He's not getting his PGA card back.
697
canadian1987 May 2, 2026 +306
The $50+ million figure is not an out-of-pocket fine, but rather a combination of lost earnings and penalties: Equity Forfeiture: Koepka agreed to a five-year forfeiture of potential equity in the PGA Tour’s Player Equity Program, which is valued by the Tour at $50m–$85m. Charity Donation: He agreed to make a $5 million charitable donation. Bonuses/Exemptions: He was declared ineligible for 2026 FedEx Cup bonus money and cannot receive sponsor exemptions into $20 million signature events.
306
andoesq May 2, 2026 +62
Ok thanks for that context, I was wondering how it could possibly be legal to fine someone for going to work for a rival company....
62
ultimate_avacado May 2, 2026 +63
All private company contracts.
63
L_Cranston_Shadow May 2, 2026 +26
There's a definite argument to be made that it is still an antitrust violation. Even though LIV no longer exists, they are using/abusing their dominant position to discourage players from ever joining a competing firm, crippling any competitor from the cradle, if you'll excuse the unintentional alliteration.
26
ultimate_avacado May 3, 2026 +13
Players knew in advance they would be blacklisted from returning to the PGA. It's in their PGA contract that they cannot leave and return, and cannot play in competing competitions without explicit partnership or permission. They are totally within their legal right to do so. They aren't preventing anyone from playing or watching golf.
13
L_Cranston_Shadow May 3, 2026 +9
They have a dominant position, some would say a monopoly position, when it comes to major tournaments and television deals in the United States. Just because it is in a contract doesn't mean one of these players can't sye, and potentially win, over being unfairly kept out of professional golf, which pretty much is non-existent in the US outside of the PGA.
9
weckyweckerson May 3, 2026 +4
I didn't know it we a legal right to be included in a game? The monopoly argument goes out the window simply because LIV existed and proved that the PGA wasn't the only tournament around.
4
Aazadan May 3, 2026 +4
Not everything put into a contract is legal. Parties sign to clauses they don't believe are enforcable all the time, just as companies put them into the contracts.
4
xxxxxxxsandos May 2, 2026 +31
You (the golfer) AGREE to it. He wasn't fined for leaving, it's not like they tried to collect. Its okay you can rejoin but only if you agree that we get to fine you.
31
Certain_Luck_8266 May 2, 2026 +5
Interesting you say that...this is precisely the reason many of the LIV golfers sued the PGA. Bryson dropped out of the suit, but some of the others are still continuing it.
5
charlesbear May 2, 2026 +115
> Brooks Koepke come back a few years ago It was actually in January. Life moves pretty fast...
115
stackjr May 2, 2026 +11
I was just talking to a friend and I mentioned something that happened last week and she responded with "dude, that was last year...". Where has the time gone?!
11
jescoewhite May 2, 2026 +12
It didn't cost him $50M to rejoin. It cost him a $5M charitable donation, and access to other funds/events that Tour members in good standing have. That's like saying it cost me $45M. Not getting access to something he didn't have access to before isn't costing him money.
12
federal_gamer04 May 2, 2026 +21
The reporting is that the players who went to LIV have contracts to sort out before they could possibly return, but that there’s also some bad blood and the PGA isn’t exactly clamoring to rescue these guys and bring them back. All that being said, money talks and I suspect there will be something worked out so the big names that left come back to the PGA.
21
foolmetwiceagain May 2, 2026 +33
It’s actually unprecedented. The LIV guys made so much they likely don’t need to play for money. Maybe a whole business will be born of paying these guys to come play a round with your group. Corporate outings, charity tournaments, celebrity Pro-Am kind of events. Maybe a few go abroad to find non PGA tours to play for money in. It’s also weird to me that the PGA announced, with much egg on some PGA golfer and supporters’ faces, a plan to merge with LIV. Followed by…nothing. No updates, progress reports, or milestone updates. Did that agreement just not have any meaning? No clause for specific performance? Really weird in the world of M&A to reach an announcement milestone after so much public criticism and attention, then just go dark and not even announce a formal cancellation with some pablum excuse like “market developments”. Would love for leaders from both sides to explain that one.
33
kumquat_bananaman May 2, 2026 +27
I’m not up to date but they had entered into merger talks at one point as a result of settling litigation. I assume PGA will likely ramp those back up to close this sordid chapter.
27
Tryhard_3 May 2, 2026 +39
My general understanding is that the PGA essentially dealt Saudi Arabia into their business after the Saudis successfully used LIV Golf to present an existential threat to the organization. However, in the end, the golfers got what they wanted on either side of the fence, higher payouts from PGA tour events. A lot of people in golf got embarrassed on this one for different reasons. Personally I don't fault a bunch of golfers for going to the golf version of WCW to get paid. You could object to the idea of Saudi money, but now the PGA is Saudi money.
39
hybridck May 3, 2026 +4
The talks stalled out and never actually went anywhere. Eventually the PGA Tour figured out the writing was on the wall for Liv anyways because they were struggling to find broadcast partners while the PGA Tour was seeing its ratings going up last year, so they had no incentive to make a deal.
4
Elguapo69 May 3, 2026 +1
Why would the PGA merger at this point? If it’s true and LIV is in trouble there is no benefit to the PGA to enter into a merger. Just let them fold and go after the assets you want.
1
spazz720 May 2, 2026 +2
They’ll most likely pay a fine and be welcomed back in like Koepka was.
2
ernyc3777 May 3, 2026 +1
They didn’t have contracts with PGA. That’s why they left. The PGA card essentially is a guarantee into the clubhouse but they have to fly their way their and their caddy’s way there and they have to pay their own sleeping accommodations. They also didn’t get anything from the tour if they showed up and had a bad Thursday and Friday and missed the cut for Saturday and Sunday. LIV came in with PIF funding and gave them guaranteed contracts in the form of prepayments for performance. They also paid for travel expenses and housing. It really want a good deal for the players as long as you don’t look at where the money came from. It also prompted PGA to make better financial arrangements for the players in guaranteed payouts for certain tournaments for showing up. Increasing prize pools for majors and higher tier tournaments. Nothing in the way of guaranteed contracts but an improvement.
1
[deleted] May 2, 2026 +177
[deleted]
177
spazz720 May 2, 2026 +204
It made zero money and they could have at least burned the billions they spent and enjoyed the warmth from the fire.
204
Familiarsophie May 2, 2026 +92
Made zero money is maybe generous, it actively lost money! £2million for broadcasting rights is truly embarrassing.
92
I_is_a_dogg May 3, 2026 +9
Who knew spending millions on players and events with almost zero spectators would be a bad business play
9
foolmetwiceagain May 2, 2026 +137
I actually think it made the Kingdom look worse, which is quite an achievement.
137
nesper May 2, 2026 +29
i dont remember where i saw it (here or twtter) but a golf analyst said it brought more attention to the shitty things the SA rulers do. So the sportswashing backfired. The same post or tweet that mentioned this noted the analyst was very anti liv.
29
GreenStrong May 2, 2026 +88
The Saudi golf venture failed but they may have not actually intended to profit on LIV golf. They offered to buy the PGA, and were rejected. Then they poured money into an upstart competitor and made another overture to PGA. I'm not sure the point was actually for LIV to make money, it may have been a strategy to pressure PGA. PGA would have been a profitable investment even if they had to burn money on LIV to get it. But, the whole thing is based on a misunderstanding of the culture of golf; it is a sacred bastion of WASP culture.
88
Abba_Fiskbullar May 2, 2026 +53
Are you saying they couldn't buy the PGA so they made their own PGA, but with b******** and hookers?
53
Meerkat_Mayhem_ May 2, 2026 +18
Saudi Moms: we have PGA at home
18
Cautious_Condition82 May 2, 2026 +13
Seemed like PGA was seriously considering a merger for a bit so it almost worked. 
13
icbint May 2, 2026 +4
Depends how you perceive losing several billion dollars
4
hera-fawcett May 2, 2026 +3
saudi arabia is pulling back from all nonlocal and nonessential investments due to the war
3
InstructionPurple911 May 2, 2026 +6
It was setup to launder money
6
key2200 May 3, 2026 +1
It's golf.
1
celix24 May 2, 2026 +312
Is it true that they seem to be cancelling a lot of projects and investments recently? Wonder what's the reasoning.
312
FlyingDiscsandJams May 2, 2026 +454
They set billions of dollars on fire with the idiotic The Line megaproject that will never happen. They also are financing like 35% of the $100B Warner Brothers purchase for Paramount.
454
Daxtatter May 3, 2026 +47
They're also going to have substantial funds going to LockMart in the near future.
47
Wafkak May 3, 2026 +5
They also financed a large part of Musks Twitter purchase. Notably with Tesla shares as collateral.
5
Interesting_Pen_167 May 2, 2026 +33
The line is literally being built right now isn't it? not sure how successful it is.
33
xxxxxxxsandos May 2, 2026 +128
Not since the end of 2025, and if it resumes, it will be max 5km.
128
Interesting_Pen_167 May 2, 2026 +28
Interesting I have a friend who went to work on that project haven't talked to him since last year but I was surprised when he told me it was actually happening.
28
_ryuujin_ May 2, 2026 +61
it started but got cancelled, now theyre trying to think of ways to repurpose what was done for something else. 
61
Liatin11 May 2, 2026 +23
I have an idea ... Add another axis
23
KDR_11k May 3, 2026 +19
Sorry, they settled on "build AI datacenters instead".
19
CAPS_LOCK_STUCK_HELP May 2, 2026 +17
thats the way it goes - get all the hype so you get the investment, spend years "planning" and getting more investments. when the people not in on the con start getting antsy, show that youre building something and get a new round of investments. then once you've gotten all the money you can - cancel everything and leave with everyone's "investments"
17
Rabbit-Hole-Quest May 3, 2026 +6
It can become an Iranian drone sponge.
6
hybridck May 3, 2026 +7
You can see what they managed to get done before the cancelation on Google maps. All that money for what ultimately became a giant trench in the desert
7
phluidity May 3, 2026 +3
Nope. They did a bunch of early site and prep work, and did an insane amount of ground prep that was labor intensive but not technically complicated. But basically the parts that everyone would consider "the Line" are dead in the water because the extreme technical and physics based challenges have yet to be solved, and probably will never be in a way that makes any kind of financial success. So they may build something called the Line at some point to save face, but it will almost certainly just be a veneer of a city to look good to the public but basically be an empty facade.
3
Cynykl May 4, 2026 +1
I knew it was going to fail when they announced that to make it feasible they were going to use hyperloop.
1
Talador12 May 4, 2026 +1
Also war in Iran and idk, maybe no one watches their programming? Lol
1
raptearer May 2, 2026 +67
The projects have had time and they're starting to realize a lot of people promised the Crown Prince the moon but we're never going to get even close. The Line is going to be too expensive and impossible to build, the mountain ski resort in SA was never going to be feasible, and now this. They're just realizing yes people are a thing and they never have your best interest at heart
67
handsoapdispenser May 3, 2026 +27
I wish we could just speak more plainly about foreign leaders like we do our own. MBS is a moron. He engineered a palace coup, murdered a few enemies, cozied up to some Western business douches and assumed he was a genius. But he's acatually a moron and is running his country moronally. His years in charge may genuinely be human history's greatest ever bag fumble. 
27
dazedandloitering 16 hr ago +1
\> years in charge may genuinely be human history's greatest ever bag fumble.  Saudi Arabia is much better than it was before him. This is a fact.
1
Time_News_8452 May 2, 2026 +176
It might be related to some other news about certain events and a need for money at home to rebuild. Also events like these were an indirect bribe to a certain individual, which has not yielded positive returns. You can figure it out.
176
BloodFartz69 May 2, 2026 +115
I hope every member of the royal family is reverted back to living in a tent and riding a camel in my lifetime. F*** Saudi Arabia and the royal family in particular. We should consider that country an enemy in the US.
115
RazzzMcFrazzz May 2, 2026 +87
They absolutely are an enemy to the US. 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers were Saudi and we went after Iraq instead because we couldn’t dare risk losing their oil money. The royal family cares nothing for the US except as a puppet. The Khashoggi ordeal was a fine example. The US is SAs b****.
87
BloodFartz69 May 2, 2026 +38
And Israel's now too!
38
el_dude_brother2 May 2, 2026 +3
The US is the enemy to everyone except Israel and maybe Russia now to be fair
3
TurbulentPromise4812 May 2, 2026 +7
It's funny to think about. The Saudi Royal family had about hundred years to build wealth and power. Then they were able to lose billions or possibly trillions by getting in bed with an orange rapist that ruined all of his own businesses.
7
piddydb May 2, 2026 +25
In order for these types of projects to work out the way they wanted it to, you gotta be invested for the long haul. It’s just really hard for an authoritarian state with natural resources to think like that because, if they did, they would also realize granting more freedoms in general at home would also yield the type of results they’re looking for, both financially and diplomatically, for a fraction of the cost. But if they figured that out, they would have done it decades ago.
25
Newone1255 May 2, 2026 +23
Kind of funny they would rather spend 100s of billions of dollars on bullshit rather than just be nice to women lmfao
23
theghostlore May 2, 2026 +8
And even they get free healthcare
8
stamosface May 3, 2026 +1
Damn. I never thought about it that way. Great point
1
Fallen0001 May 2, 2026 +25
trump pissed off MBS. LIV was always a grift set up to pay trump fees to have events at his courses. no doubt, when he was done being president, trump wanted to "run" LIV for fun.
25
Daxtatter May 3, 2026 +9
Also contrary to popular belief the Gulf states don't have infinite money. After a couple generations of blowing their wealth on conspicuous consumption, buying public compliance, nonsensical vanity projects, propping up friendly dictators, and a series of wildly expensive wars, theirs not much left in the coffers to throw hundreds of millions of dollars at golfers.
9
Fallen0001 May 3, 2026 +5
understood. but SA in this example, didnt just give trump money via LIV etc. through event fees, for fun. Jared also got 2bil from SA. question is: what did they buy? Jack Smith was going to find out meaning the money wasnt just a gift, it was meant to buy something. we know now that trump isnt / hasn't wont follow through with his promise to them.
5
Electronic_Wind_3254 May 3, 2026 +5
They lost their leverage to fix oil prices by UAE leaving OPEC, plus America “taking” Venezuela. The fact that the straits are closed means that their primary source of income is on fire and that doesn’t seem to be changing soon. As long as the straits are closed or there is the threat of an attack to ships passing through, markets are going to look for alternatives. A lot of oil and LNG tankers are currently docked or heading to America.
5
RobutNotRobot May 3, 2026 +1
They need more weapons/bribe money.
1
mistersmiley318 May 3, 2026 +1
The war?
1
AudibleNod May 2, 2026 +249
Phil Mickelson can finally get a good night's sleep now.
249
PaulClifford May 2, 2026 +179
He’ll bet you he can’t.
179
foolmetwiceagain May 2, 2026 +23
Best comment in this thread
23
Predator_ May 2, 2026 +14
[Chop chop... ](https://www.npr.org/2023/10/02/1202937036/jamal-khashoggi-mbs-murder-saudi-arabia-human-rights)
14
xwords59 May 2, 2026 +5
But can he afford the taxes?
5
hybridck May 3, 2026 +1
Phil Mickelson seems to be more obsessed with some random oil company that he gambled most of his contract on and begging Trump to bail him out somehow.
1
H0vis May 2, 2026 +126
Have to laugh at how Saudi Arabia just blasted billions upon billions of dollars on the dumbest shit imaginable. Impossible cities in the desert. Newcastle United. Golf. Random sporting events that immediately became lame. If the Saudis had any accountability the clown car in a cube-crusher disaster that has been the current regime would be scrutinised in greater depth, but since that shit'll get you killed we'll have to appreciate from a distance.
126
nau5 May 3, 2026 +69
I mean that's because SA is just a real life hillbillies of Beverly hills. They just happened to be located on trillions worth of Oil. It doesn't take genius to sell oil. Add to that since they are a royalty. Your birth is more important than your merit so it's just a bunch of bozos running the ship.
69
limitbreakse May 3, 2026 +12
Hilarious, and actually correct
12
H0vis May 3, 2026 +4
Yeah. The irony is while they started out as convenient numbskulls to be left in charge so other people could take the oil, their money gave them the ability to influence the nations that were originally exploiting them.
4
Chiron17 May 2, 2026 +18
Spreading the money out is part of the reason they don't get scrutinised. Helps when there's soooo much of it.
18
H0vis May 2, 2026 +10
Yeah, I mean when they bought Newcastle United in the English football league they leaned on the prime minister to make it happen. That's the leverage their money gives them.
10
night_dude May 3, 2026 +5
Newcastle United 😂😂😂
5
B_Boudreaux May 3, 2026 +2
Watch it.
2
Digifiend84 May 4, 2026 +2
Well, their fans were happy at the time, because it meant they got rid of Mike Ashley.
2
6ixstringlife May 3, 2026 +1
Silver lining... at least construction workers and landscapers put food on their table
1
HungryCurrency8481 10 hr ago +1
I find it hilarious that Saudi Arabia is on a mission to win hearts and minds, but instead of establishing cultural soft power of their own like South Korea, they just piggyback of established trends like sports and throw obscene amounts of money at these sports and turn them into bawdy, glitzy spectacles that ruin the image of sports in the fans' eyes. It is quite telling that despite Saudi Arabia being the home of Islam, nearly all the cultural and scientific legacies of the Islamic golden age came from other Islamic empires that took principles from Saudi Arabia and actually created something of value. 
1
BlueSoccerSB8706 May 2, 2026 +148
All active pga players should join up to ban those players, they wanted saudi money and almost killed the pga
148
neonknife99 May 2, 2026 +96
No one missed them. That’s probably a hard pill to swallow.
96
sipperofguinness May 2, 2026 +47
I certainly didn't miss deshamboy and his petulant cuntiness.
47
SherbetFluffy1867 May 2, 2026 +12
Awesome band name.
12
Mr_Tiggywinkle May 2, 2026 +7
I miss cam smith. Thats about it. But he's seemingly packed it in after he got his 50m
7
f-150Coyotev8 May 2, 2026 +3
Plus it’s not like there is a market for more golf leagues anyway. It’s a great sport to play, but it’s a bore to watch if you don’t play yourself.
3
NateShaw92 5 days ago +1
I kinda miss rahm. Weird guy but good player
1
Captcha_Imagination May 2, 2026 +28
Saw a youtube news story about this and one of the golfers who got let back into the PGA had to pay approx. 90 m USD in charitable donations to be accepted back. So i'm guessing only the big names will be back in the short term and they will make an example of the rest. If only the same could happen Ole Billy Blood Money and all the other comedians who sold their soul to Bonesaw.
28
MSERRADAred May 3, 2026 +7
Who's the Billie you're referencing? And I agree, it's disgusting that golf & other entertainment events are/were washing the blood money.
7
Captcha_Imagination May 3, 2026 +6
Bill Burr
6
kohossle May 3, 2026 +8
90M is a shitton of money. That’s awesome if true
8
hybridck May 3, 2026 +10
It's actually $5 million. Still a lot, but idk where the other guy got $90 million
10
FreshPrinceOfRivia May 2, 2026 +63
Investing in a sport that most if not all Western countries perceive as high-class / elite oriented is a terrible sportswashing strategy.
63
Rabbit-Hole-Quest May 3, 2026 +14
My dude; thats literally the purpose. Golfing was a gateway for the Saudi’s to establish connections with the elite across the world. In the first Trump admin, governments literally turned to Trumps golfing buddies to establish channels with Trump. Nearly every single one of the royals in Europe, and major politicians play golf. This was all an elaborate way to spread Saudi tentacles under the guise of sports.
14
IAmTheHappiest May 2, 2026 +11
Hopefully they'll f1 so
11
RangerAlex22 May 2, 2026 +19
My question is what else is Saudi Arabia cutting funding from?
19
superviewer May 3, 2026 +10
Pretty much everything sports related according to their own reports. I also think the Saudi Pro League is going to go down the tubes because of this.
10
hybridck May 3, 2026 +3
What happens to the World Cup they already bought?
3
superviewer May 3, 2026 +3
One of two options: Since it's 2034, they have enough time to still pivot and invest if they so choose. How feasible it will be given the both ecological climate and the political climate is a good question. They could decide to tell Infantino to f*** off, bow out, and force renegotiations for both the '30 and '34 tournaments. It would be extremely messy, but there should be ideas already on the table.
3
NateShaw92 5 days ago +1
2030 is too late to change, most they can do is take away the 3 south america games. Maybe then put 2034 there. Long shot though economically.
1
superviewer 4 days ago +1
Economically, yes. But it would force a more traditional qualification process for both tournaments realistically. The three games in '30 would be beneficial overall in the actual host countries, and by '34 maybe those three can be better organized, hard to say. Having two trinational tournaments back to back wouldn't be terrible for FIFA, honestly.
1
NateShaw92 4 days ago +1
2026 is trinational is it not?
1
superviewer 4 days ago +1
Yes, my mistake...so if they move the South American matches and have them host '34, it would be 3 back to back. Still not a problem to me, and honestly I wish 2030 was South American to celebrate the centennial.
1
vikinick May 3, 2026 +9
I have a feeling that their esports investments will eventually be on the chopping block too. They're losing a significant amount of money with those (not as much as LIV though) and eventually will realize it's not worth it to them.
9
UselessInsight May 2, 2026 +16
Lol. Lmao. Saudi blood money dried up real quick huh?
16
Midzotics May 2, 2026 +35
Mr Bone Saw will need to find another route to launder.
35
Meat-Dimension May 2, 2026 +34
It’s not money laundering it’s reputation laundering
34
CoconutBangerzBaller May 2, 2026 +8
Honestly, I feel like the sportswashing, at least in this instance, backfired on them. I used to only hate them for being an absolute monarchy that murders people. But now I hate them for being an absolute monarchy that kills people and tried to destroy golf.
8
SarK-9 May 2, 2026 +9
Why would the Saudi royal family ever need to launder money? They have absolute power over their country, people and government. The Saudi IRS isn't going to be auditing their tax returns and making them prove their trillions of dollars were legitimately earned and taxed properly.
9
Much-Instruction-807 May 2, 2026 +45
It's Saudi Arabia punishing Trump for the Iran war. They were using LIV Golf to launder their image and help people ignore all their civil rights abuses, same with that multi million dollar comedy tour, and pay Trump millions as well for his support. Now they're getting bombed by Shahed drones and are pissed.
45
KJShen May 3, 2026 +8
Its worth noting there are reports that SA are ones who were pushing for the war. If there's punishment its because Trump isn't committed to properly finishing it.
8
Rabbit-Hole-Quest May 3, 2026 +5
The Saudis were not for the war. However, once it got started they basically said finish the Iranian regime. Trump, being Trump, created the worst outcome where the Iranians are still in power and have become the dominant force in the region thanks to Hormuz.
5
HungryCurrency8481 10 hr ago +1
It's pretty much confirmed that MBS was privately urging Trump to strike Iran while publicly advocating for diplomacy. The only constant with the Saudi regime is their duplicity. 
1
AloneChapter May 2, 2026 +15
Oh no how will the bored and rich survive ??
15
Musicman1972 May 2, 2026 +19
Bored rich people weren't watching LIV golf. I'm not even sure who was.
19
Fallen0001 May 2, 2026 +10
I guess trump really did piss off MBS. there goes that grift.
10
pawood689 May 3, 2026 +4
Oh no! What will all these rich ppl do??
4
Shamrockah May 2, 2026 +7
They can go work in any golf course proshop in the world now. Good luck to them!
7
OG_sirloinchop May 2, 2026 +12
As an outside observer... LIV used trump courses and is backed by US right wing... then folds b2cause the money doesn't like US right wing shit
12
JOAEPB May 2, 2026 +5
Good!!!! F*** liv anyone who wants back on pga needs to pay back what they took from liv
5
JOAEPB May 2, 2026 +4
To the pga
4
foodisgod9 May 2, 2026 +3
Liv players got paid upfront right?
3
flcinusa May 2, 2026 +3
Q School those fuckers, then a year on the Korn Ferry tour, minimum
3
primus202 May 2, 2026 +3
Didn’t the PGA sign a deal with LIV some time last year? What happens with that?
3
hybridck May 3, 2026 +2
They were in negotiations to do that. The negotiations never ended up going anywhere
2
primus202 May 3, 2026 +1
Ah ok I thought they buried the hatchet. 
1
passamongimpure May 2, 2026 +3
Back to the country courses with you
3
billleachmsw May 3, 2026 +3
When will this actually happen? I have been seeing this story for over a week now.
3
superviewer May 4, 2026 +2
The end of the year. They'll piecemeal the rest of the 2026 season, but expect this to be the end.
2
isledelfino666 May 2, 2026 +10
It’s almost like taking blood money might bite you in the ass someday. F*** golf, bunch of ankle sock wearing sallies, that’s all I know.
10
0694U May 3, 2026 +2
And they really don’t give an effort in their game because they’re so rich from sponsorships. It’s so boring to watch.
2
poestavern May 2, 2026 +5
Yep…What goes around comes around….shouldn’t have left the PGA in the first place. 🤣🤣🤣
5
Billy_Chrystals May 3, 2026 +2
Heads are gonna roll because of this. Gonna end up Bryson DeCham-bonesaw.
2
waffleking77 May 3, 2026 +2
They are about to own EA and presumably the rights to the PGA Tour games. Why would they put money into LIV if they're now going to be financially invested in the PGA brand? This makes sense from that perspective.
2
textmint May 3, 2026 +2
I wonder how much damage MBS would’ve done before he either exits or dies or is deposed. With the kind of enemies he’s made, he has to keep one eye open even when he sleeps. If he thinks that all those guys who enjoyed his “hospitality” at the Ritz Carlton decide to let bygones be bygones, he’s got another thing coming.
2
Sophisticated_Dicks May 2, 2026 +3
When money laundering goes wrong….or right. I don’t know how it works.
3
sunkcostbro May 3, 2026 +2
The hardon people have for hating LIV and trying to parade the PGA around like it's morally better is hilarious...
2
Blahblahblahblah109 May 3, 2026 +3
Well, once they had their meeting at Mar-a-lago so Trump could sell them stolen US secrets, it was only a matter of time.
3
← Back to Board