· 198 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 10, 2026 at 12:33 PM

Malcomn, Scrubs, King of the Hill. After nearly two decades of bad reboots, why have we finally gotten to an era of absolutely wonderful continuations?

Posted by AndNowAStoryAboutMe

It really feels like streamers looked at Will & Grace and Frasier and finally realized that we LIKED the tone of the original and changing it is a huge mistake. But we also require growth, feeling the passage of time. We want to check back in, not start over. We want to remember how it felt, but not pretend we haven't also moved forward in our own lives. We want to meet new characters, not be in a new universe. And those three f****** nailed it. Here's to more of the good shit. Bring it on!
🚩 Report this post

198 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
BirthdayCheesecake Apr 10, 2026 +488
I feel like King of the Hill worked because one of the main themes of the OG series was Hank having to learn to adapt to a world around him that goes against his core beliefs - and being willing to change some of those core beliefs. Putting him in a modern era - especially since he had been separated from it for several years while working in Saudi Arabia - and having to again shift some of those beliefs is a story that continues to work. Having Bobby as an adult who is equally as stubborn as he is and them butting heads at times as a result is also incredibly realistic.
488
Lord0fHats Apr 10, 2026 +111
If I may opine, a big thing about why Hank works so well as a character is that Hank has at his core the beliefs and values of mid-western America, but he's introspective, considerate, and willing to see when how he applies those values makes him feel bad, foolish, or hurting someone he never meant to hurt. And when confronted with that Hank owns up, apologizes when he's done wrong, and sticks around to lend a hand or be a neighbor. Hank embodies what we want people to be like, and has just enough flaw and stubbornness we wonder if maybe people are really more like Hank than our wacky headbutting and polarizing world often leaves us feeling. Hank makes us wonder if maybe we should cut our fellow man some slack and just have a beer with them, instead of making assumptions about who they are or what they think, or that they'll never change.
111
DistortedAudio Apr 10, 2026 +47
Hank is the idealized version of an American and you’re exactly right with your characterization. It’s really fascinating because you can see Judge falls back onto that idea when putting Hank (and Arlon overall) into a lot of situations. That opening episode of the new season is a perfect example. Of course they’d be put off by the pronouns stuff but also bearing some small discomfort to accommodate and lift up your neighbor is the basis of America (as a myth at least). So of course they would ultimately be OK with it. Watching them grumble through the episode just to realize at the end that it’s a beautiful day outside and that community is still there, just changed. It’s monumentally hopeful, and the staff really nailed it.
47
CutePuppyforPrez Apr 10, 2026 +40
Hank feels like what people used to be like before the media convinced everyone on both sides that they absolutely positively have to hate each other for every little thing, because that hatred is great for ratings.
40
Miguel_Branquinho Apr 11, 2026 +2
Hank Hill is probably one of the best role models in all American TV, only beaten out by Jean-Luc Picard.
2
Ruthlessrabbd Apr 10, 2026 +181
I love the kind of person Bobby grew up to be. He's a little more flexible than his dad at times but still Hank's son at the end of the day. I liked Clover a lot as a character though 😓 especially what she did to Jerry Jones
181
Lord0fHats Apr 10, 2026 +56
This was the highlight of the new season for me. Ever since they announced it what I wanted to see more than anything is an Adult Bobby and they absolutely delivered by just making Bobby basically his dad but with different passions and a little more hapless affability vs his father's stiff charm. But the way Bobby commits to his business and endures a bad 'business partner' is so much Hank. I also loved the Joseph is still so much Dale's son, despite everything.
56
The_Reluctant_Hero Apr 11, 2026 +3
>I also loved the Joseph is still so much Dale's son, despite everything. Bruh, the scene where him and Dale were sneaking around then he transformers into a bag of trash to hide was so f****** funny to me lmao. I couldn't stop laughing at how ridiculous that looked. 😂
3
BirthdayCheesecake Apr 10, 2026 +72
She did what all of us non-Cowboy fans wish we could do! It's interesting to see how Bobby inherited certain traits from Hank, but with a more modern take on them. For example, he has that same strong work ethic, but he doesn't blindly idolize his boss the way Hank did with Buck Strickland.
72
the__ghola__hayt Apr 10, 2026 +23
> non-Cowboy fans You act like Cowboy fans don't also want to shit on Jerry's desk.
23
Wakkichewy Apr 10, 2026 +11
Her name is Willow lol
11
ShamelessSpiff Apr 10, 2026 +5
Bobby was, in my opinion, the strongest part of a very strong revival.
5
arshbjangles Apr 11, 2026 +3
Honestly I liked Willow way more than adult Connie. I hope she sticks around in some capacity.
3
SageOfTheWise Apr 10, 2026 +23
To a smaller extent this was something that also had me thinking Scrubs had a better chance than most of these reboots. The standard reboot formula of "the main characters are now mentors to a new generation of characters" that often alienates the fans, actually already just describes most of the seasons of Scrubs. Once the main cast got through their training, almost every season had a new class of interns they were mentoring. You don't have to change anything. Obviously the other (harder) part is also just writing consistently good episodes. Buts that's harder to quantify lol.
23
PerfectZeong Apr 10, 2026 +17
They found a way to keep it king of the hill, and yet modernize it, which I thought would be impossible. The same basic idea but since KoTh was always a show about modern issues there are now New modern issues to play with. Also they aged the kids up perfectly. Bobby is Hanks son, hard working and capable but still Bobby. I think they did a tremendous job. I was afraid they'd make Bobby a f*** up when in reality they show he got some of the best parts of his dad.
17
rougepenguin Apr 10, 2026 +13
I think this is important, the show itself matters. Like, Malcolm is the same thing to me. Of course the natural extension of that is getting to play with the "grass is always greener" element of the child being a parent himself now. Lois was always shown as being like Malcolm when she was younger, it was a running thing her parents being around brought out a lot of old issues. It captures the vibe of like, going back to your hometown for a funeral after twenty years and seeing *that* family hasn't changed a bit. Just like with King of the Hill, you could guess there was a lot of potential and how they might go about it pretty easily.
13
giskardwasright Apr 10, 2026 +7
The Beavis and Butthead reboot is also great. The old Beavis and Butthead episodes where they are in their 40s are f****** amazing. Mike Judge is a gem.
7
sh33pd00g Apr 10, 2026 +5
Damnit, now I can't wait for the new season. I need more!!
5
joecb91 Apr 10, 2026 +2
I loved the idea of Bobby growing up to be a chef too
2
vafrow Apr 10, 2026 +2
The King of the Hill reboot was an incredible feat of walking a fine line. I feel the nature of that show almost forces you to confront Trump politics. And leaning into that gets very boring very quickly. The Hank in Saudi Arabia plotline helps navigate around it. It keeps it on the periphery. I also think they found the perfect age for us to be following Bobby. I like how he's got his young adult problems, but overall, they've given us an extremely well adjusted young man. That the years of the show that showed us loving and supportive parenting results in a pretty good outcome. At the core, that's the comfort of that show. That the Hills weren't perfect but they're general outlook on life leads them to a generally happy and successful life and usually a stabilizing force for those around them.
2
T_Cliff Apr 10, 2026 +2
The voice actor for dale ruined it for me and my gf.
2
amo1337 Apr 10, 2026 +1290
Because Mike Judge and Bill Lawrence make high quality shows?
1290
Doctursea Apr 10, 2026 +245
Also I think it’s important that the people who made the show actually are into the reboot rather than just having money thrown at them for nostalgia. Watching some of the 90s reboots were painful
245
imadragonyouguys Apr 10, 2026 +87
This is why Bill and Ted was fun and The Matrix was awful. The people who made Bill and Ted honestly wanted to finish the story.
87
RadarSmith Apr 10, 2026 +66
Also, I think The Wachowskis actively wanted to torch the franchise with the fourth movie.
66
Override9636 Apr 10, 2026 +52
I think it was Warner Brothers saying we're going to make a 4th movie whether you're involved or not. And the Wachowskis saying "well f*** you too!"
52
thesharkticon Apr 11, 2026 +14
This is explicitly said in the movie. There is a whole segment about how the game within the movie that Neo created is being rebooted with or without his involvement, so he decided he needs to do it to minimize damage.
14
Effehezepe Apr 10, 2026 +12
Well, Lana wanted to torch the franchise anyways. Lilly didn't even show up, which shows you how much the Wachowskis don't care about this shit anymore.
12
NickRick Apr 10, 2026 +11
I didn't really like Bill and Ted. Trying to put the focus on the next generation didn't work for me
11
Oerwinde Apr 10, 2026 +3
The movie was funny, but yeah, that was a failure.
3
shastaxc Apr 10, 2026 +1
I disagree. The whole series uses absurdism to show the usual transition through life that many people experience: 1. Do cool and fun stuff with friends 2. Start to wonder if there's a deeper meaning to life and what you're supposed to do to fit into it, or maybe you shouldn't fit in and you're better off standing out 3. Realize it never mattered anyway. Life is about the journey, how you show your love for others, and experiencing love in return They needed that last movie to show the end of their journey. It wasn't about trying to shoehorn new actors in to take over the franchise, it was about wrapping up Bill & Ted's life lessons and giving them a happy ending. It never felt like being the greatest of all time really fit right for their characters. They're well-meaning, bumbling idiots just trying to do their best. They never achieved the heights that were foretold, and you can tell they felt the reverence they got in the earlier movies was unearned. The weight of great expectations became unbearable to the point that they became different people than they ever meant to be, and it was ruining their lives. By changing the interpretation of the prophecy, they were able to get their happiness and sense of self back. The series either needed to end the way it did or have a hollow ending where they actually bring about world peace just because the writers wrote themselves into that corner. I know I would've hated that ending. And to top it all off, they made the message relatable for all the plebs out there who failed to achieve their hopes and dreams, but ended up being good parents. That's enough for most people, so that resonates with a lot of viewers; doesn't matter if it's cliche if it's true.
1
Riceatron Apr 10, 2026 +14
Seeing complaints about Matrix 4 is so funny because I place so much value on the clear intentionality in art that a movie that is meant to burn down the structure that made it is getting high marks in my book. It also follows up on the MMO, which is kinda wild to do but hey. As a Matrix fan that cares about even the deeper lore, Matrix 4 was a good movie. As a film that was making a statement, it was excellent.
14
TessaThompsonBurger Apr 10, 2026 +14
To me its clearly a movie made with both love and resentment. Love for their characters and the ideas they brought to mainstream and resentment towards the crass commercialization that they felt pressured into their whole careers. I dont think Lana was trying to burn anything down at all, as a matter of fact she has repeatedly stated she was drawn to revisit the characters after the death of her parents. The movie looks and feels the way it does because she said as she grew older her relationship with the craft of filmmaking became more loose and comfortable and less a*** and specifc. The movie ends with Neo and Trinity thanking the NPH villian for giving them a chance to look at their legacy through a renewed lens. Whether or not it works for people is another story lol clearly it didn't but it was not a movie made by people who hated their creation at all, its a movie made by someone who loves her creation but hates what was taken from it.
14
cocoagiant Apr 11, 2026 +12
For Malcolm it took Cranston 10+ years to convince Linwood Boomer (show creator) to come back with a reunion. So these are shows which are less cash grabs and more labors of love.
12
peanutmanak47 Apr 11, 2026 +5
The new Beavis and Butthead has been absolutely f****** amazing. Mike Judge is the man.
5
sky1988 Apr 10, 2026 +458
I think because the people involved actually love the shows they were in and created and still want to have great continuations and not just a cash grab
458
jvpewster Apr 10, 2026 +73
I think it’s also perfect amount of time off. The cast and show runners/creator had careers that panned out. They didn’t come to this with the baggage of “well I guess I suck and can only do EAGLEEEE” but they’re not so old it feels like a new setup entirely. The fans too. It almost feels new again to me.
73
tarrsk Apr 10, 2026 +69
With Scrubs in particular, I don’t think it can be discounted how big of an impact Braff and Faison’s podcast had. Not just in drumming up interest for the continuation among cast, crew, and fans, but especially because it involved the stars and main writers of the show going all the way back to the first season and getting to experience, with the benefit of time and distance, what made the early seasons of their show so damn special. The new season of Scrubs is probably closest in vibe to the second and third seasons of the original run. It’s a little less grounded/ more arch than the first season, but not to the absurdly flanderized degree we got in the later seasons. And I think that’s allowed it to hit the perfect sweet spot, since it would’ve felt a little off to try to recapture the rawness of that first season (since everything being new was a big part of where that came from), while still hitting the core what made fans fall in love with the show originally.
69
BigMax Apr 10, 2026 +21
Right. I think it's the intent behind them. It wasn't some network exec saying "we're all out of ideas... let's just rehash something old." It was more "it's been a while, and I love that show, I think I have some pretty good ideas on how to bring it back and still make it high quality."
21
indistrustofmerits Apr 10, 2026 +17
Yeah not really fair to compare how Bill Lawrence treats the characters he helped bring to life originally versus, oh, say, the Frasier reboot writer who got the job because he had a few funny tweets about Frasier and Niles playing DND It feels like a lot of tv writers have to try to squeeze in their original ideas through the lens of existing IP since that's the only thing seeming to get greenlit now
17
_Meece_ Apr 10, 2026 +6
Scrubs and King of the Hill didn't get to end as well as they'd have liked too.
6
Starob Apr 11, 2026 +1
Which is also the secret to One Piece live action success as opposed to almost every live action adaptation.
1
HtownSamson Apr 10, 2026 +48
Because the writers aren't just doing "you remember this thing from the original run!?" they are actually continuing the characters we love stories.
48
A_Uniqueusername444 Apr 10, 2026 +310
Scrubs has been incredible
310
ScumBucket33 Apr 10, 2026 +46
My only slight criticism is that they don’t play that little tune anymore that goes *dundundundundundundunnn dundundundundundundunnn*.
46
Putrid_Loquat_4357 Apr 10, 2026 +37
The use of music is in general nowhere near the level of the original, original scrubs used music better than any sitcom I've ever seen and it's almost non existent in the reboot.
37
m_Pony Apr 10, 2026 +29
I can't get to sleep. I think about the implications
29
1010012 Apr 10, 2026 +9
I wonder how much if that is due to how music licensing is done and streaming being a major way that shows are watched. I know licensing is different between first broadcast, dvd, reruns, and streaming. Which is why you sometimes hear different songs in different versions, and they are taking that into account when developing the soundtrack and how it plays into the show.
9
racer_24_4evr Apr 10, 2026 +8
When JD hit that door in this weeks episode I was hoping for a JD falling sound.
8
41shadox Apr 10, 2026 +5
There's one *dun* too few
5
Blythyvxr Apr 10, 2026 +5
>!They should have been brave and had the credits of the latest episode simply be a slideshow or black screen with that piano music playing over it.!< >!They undercut it with the joke scene afterwards.!<
5
The_Bat_Voice Apr 10, 2026 +93
It found what a lot of reboots lose, and the original Scrubs reboot lost, its soul. Its funny while still having emotional moments and not shying away from tough subjects.
93
FX114 Apr 10, 2026 +139
Med School wasn't a reboot. It immediately followed the series finale. It was a spinoff that the network was afraid to fully commit to.
139
bonzombiekitty Apr 10, 2026 +62
And it wasn't really a bad show either. It just wasn't Scrubs. Given a bit longer, it would have found its footing as a standalone thing.
62
FX114 Apr 10, 2026 +32
It already starts to find it in the back half. I really think it could have taken off with a second season, assuming viewers gave it the time of day.
32
bonzombiekitty Apr 10, 2026 +12
I personally liked it. It was also a bit eerie. My wife was in PA school at that time and was taking the same classes as the med school kids. There were times where it was almost word for word accurate to what my wife was experiencing. I would have sworn the whole cadaver ceremony episode was lifted directly from my wife's class.
12
epraider Apr 11, 2026 +2
I definitely agree. The worst part of that show was when JD was just kind of meandering around for the first half after regressing on his character development in Season 8. Once the new characters had time to breathe, it was pretty good. I would have watched more.
2
WithNoRegard Apr 10, 2026 +8
Cole (Dave Franco's character) is probably one of my top 3 Scrubs characters from the entire run. The show itself wasn't great, but it had a few great parts.
8
RellenD Apr 10, 2026 +2
I thought it was a better show than scrubs.
2
polymorphic_hippo Apr 10, 2026 +14
There was never a Scrubs Med School season. Whatchoo talkin' about, Willis?
14
FX114 Apr 10, 2026 +18
Gosh, I love this running joke across every franchise with a bad entry.
18
T0kenAussie Apr 10, 2026 +13
The one I always think about is the community gas leak year but tbh the season wasn’t even that bad. It was more absurd and felt a little off but every sitcom has one or two patches like that and I think those patches make me appreciate the highs more
13
FX114 Apr 10, 2026 +3
That was a good joke for sure. Although, and it's been a while, but I think I actually preferred season 4 to season 5.
3
RoboChrist Apr 10, 2026 +3
The showrunners for the gas leak year bummed me out. They clearly saw themselves as inferior to Dan Harmon, especially in their power to stand up to the executives, but they tried to keep the spirit of Community alive. There was an interview where they talked about a compromise they made doing an homage to Alfred Hitchcock's, and one of them said, to paraphrase "maybe Dan Harmon would have insisted on doing the whole episode in one shot, but we did a cut at 10 minutes in and just filmed the rest of the episode normally after that." You never tell the audience that you're not doing the best possible job you can. When you show you don't have passion for your work, you end up with something hollow and lifeless, it feels like a mannequin wearing the clothes of the characters.
3
MrRabbit Apr 10, 2026 +6
Well in this case they actually did say they are actively ignoring it and pretending it never happened in modern stories. I don't love it, because it wasn't that bad, but the showrunner is now on team "it never happened."
6
FX114 Apr 10, 2026 +6
That does make sense. I did wonder what happened to the new construction.
6
MrRabbit Apr 10, 2026 +3
Yep that's the most obvious difference! Small plot points too but I think they mostly wanted the original set feel.
3
FX114 Apr 10, 2026 +2
Although, it doesn't change the fact that there *was* a Med School season, even if it was undone.
2
pornomancer90 Apr 10, 2026 +5
They should bring a character back and have them talk about the stuff that happened in season 9 and JD and the rest of the cast just don't know what they are talking about.
5
m_Pony Apr 10, 2026 +3
I have to admit I *do* love this. I read that in the most recent episode of The Muppet Show there's one character that only appeared in Muppets Tonight, and they make a reference specific to that series. TV needs more nuggets like that.
3
_Meece_ Apr 10, 2026 +2
This one is not a joke, in many countries, the 9th season of Scrubs was marketed as a separate show called Scrubs: Med School. They also did Webisodes with the Interns in the last season, as a way to build up into that.
2
LeafyWolf Apr 10, 2026 +12
It's always about the characters. Once the audience becomes invested in the character, the writing is much easier.
12
justjoshingu Apr 10, 2026 +10
I think scrubs is special tho. That cast love each other and traffic and faison have continued to be best buds. They have embraced it through commercials and cameos.  And bill Lawrence's people. He has kept the cast with jobs in various projects. They all seem like family. 
10
restrictednumber Apr 10, 2026 +3
Christ, that first sentence took me about three tries...
3
sadranjr Apr 10, 2026 +8
It’s weird, I can’t help approaching each new episode with skepticism, but it’s won me over every time. Amazing how much it feels like the original show.
8
RainMH11 Apr 10, 2026 +5
The most recent episode knocked me on my butt. Been a while since I've had a new Scrubs episode making me tear up.
5
nondescriptun Apr 10, 2026 +12
That's because Bill Lawrence is still behind it. He's terrific.
12
Indie89 Apr 10, 2026 +5
Then aeging is very useful in this series as it adds a new depth to the show and a new dynamic.
5
Dad3mass Apr 10, 2026 +9
I love it. The first season came out my first year of med school when I was becoming a young doc so I was grappling with young doc issues like them. Now they’re middle aged docs and I’m a middle aged doc and dealing with middle aged doc issues just like they are. It’s amazing.
9
Monk-ish Apr 10, 2026 +4
It feels like a natural continuation of the original series. I'm loving it
4
ScrewWorkn Apr 10, 2026 +1
Why is Cox not in it more. I miss him.
1
OtherwiseArachnid5 Apr 10, 2026 +53
I think primarily focusing on the main cast also goes an incredibly long way. I feel like audiences have a hard time getting into revivals like Frasier and That 90s show because you have a handful of original characters that make regular appearances and people aren’t as keen to watch something like Fraiser but with no Niles or Martin.
53
TBroomey Apr 10, 2026 +24
Making Frasier without Niles or Martin (obviously necessary as John Mahoney is no longer with us) just isn't Frasier anymore. It's in the same category as Cheers as a show that features Frasier Crane. Had they called it something else and not made it an explicit revival, it might have been received better.
24
GeekAesthete Apr 10, 2026 +11
Not just call it something else, but come up with a show that works whether its a reboot/spinoff or not. Frasier worked because it was not in any way trying to be Cheers. They could easily have made the same show, changed the lead character's name, and it would still work, completely devoid of Cheers as a backstory. It doesn't even use the same tone, rhythm, or type of comedy as Cheers. It's kinda like how The Pitt was conceived as an ER spinoff, using Carter in the same way that Frasier used the character from Cheers, but the show works whether it's an ER spinoff or not. The Frasier reboot would never get greenlit as a standalone show, because it's only appeal is trying to bring back that show, but without any of the chemistry that made the show work.
11
lessmiserables Apr 10, 2026 +6
I actually really enjoyed the Frasier reboot, and I'm sad they had to pull the plug. You're right. It wasn't "Frasier 2.0." Cheers was Frasier as an upstart psychiatrist. Frasier was Frasier as a talk show host. Frasier Reboot was Frasier as a professor. Different jobs, different vibes, different co workers/friends, different focus. Some of the second season Frasier Reboot shows were really, really good. The reveal at the murder mystery party was spot on old-time Frasier. it wasn't perfect. They introduced a baby and then that baby just kept getting in the way until they basically ignored it. Also Kelsey Grammer is 70 years old and they didn't really adapt the farce to his new age. Having him frantically bustle about at a dinner party gone wrong isn't the same when he's shuffling along. But I felt the writing, especially in the second season, was back to its old form. I still chuckle at Frederick getting the third degree from those kids at the fire house.
6
Wakkichewy Apr 10, 2026 +8
Kelsey Grammer is also a huge sack of shit so that may have turned people off
8
mmbg78 Apr 10, 2026 +13
Niles was the show.
13
mootallica Apr 10, 2026 +18
I don't agree with that, but he is an essential part of the engine. Funniest character for sure, but he still needs everyone else to be funny with. A Niles spin-off with none of the other characters would probably be just as disappointing.
18
mmbg78 Apr 10, 2026 +9
Very true! I just love him though 😍
9
mootallica Apr 10, 2026 +2
Don't we all ❤️
2
Mrmojorisincg Apr 10, 2026 +6
This is 100% the answer. I wanted to like that 90’s show and honestly if they had more of the original cast present I probably would have liked it. Modern tv actors seem far less noticeable these days and I don’t think its as common that they get more famous and get larger roles. Back then, a lot of tv actors that were popular became big celebrities. With reboots, I think having as much of the original cast as you can is paramount because you want to repeat the dynamic
6
upon-taken Apr 10, 2026 +63
Malcolm reboot is only 4 episodes 😭why
63
khz30 Apr 10, 2026 +110
The original idea was a movie, and instead they split it into 4 episodes. It was never intended to be a long-term revival. In fact, they decided on the 4 episode format because it would play better in Mexico as a mini series, where the original series remains popular and is still broadcast on TV
110
Fightingdragonswithu Apr 10, 2026 +60
This is worse than the time I left Dewey in Mexico
60
barefootbandit8 Apr 10, 2026 +9
I thought he got left at the grand canyon.
9
FX114 Apr 10, 2026 +14
They have talked about it being a test for a spinoff about his daughter.
14
_Verumex_ Apr 10, 2026 +9
Which I'm shocked at how much I would be open to after seeing it. Leah and Kelly are by far the standout characters of the miniseries.
9
ChosenCharacter Apr 10, 2026 +6
Does Mexico have a tradition of 4 episode shows?
6
khz30 Apr 10, 2026 +11
No, they're used to mini series, which is how the revival is being sold. Selling it as a revival would lead to the impression that it's a continuation, when it just ends the prior series. 
11
KeremyJyles Apr 11, 2026 +2
> It was never intended to be a long-term revival. ...have you seen it? They are blatantly trying to set one up.
2
GeekAesthete Apr 10, 2026 +18
A four-episode miniseries gives them one story that provides an excuse to bring the family together. That was the chemistry of the original show, after all: the parents and the three boys living under one roof (plus Francis off at military school). Now that they're all grown up with their own lives, how would they maintain that same chemistry week after week? They would have to turn the show into Modern Family (multiple families tied together as an extended family), and I very much doubt that they could maintain the show's magic with a completely different format and completely different family dynamics, especially when the original is so tied to adolescence and the parental and sibling frustrations that come with it. Besides, they weren't getting Bryan Cranston signed for a long-term revival (and maybe not Jane Kaczmarek or Frankie Muniz either).
18
thesupermikey Apr 10, 2026 +10
Frankie Muniz had to fit it into his other job.
10
GodzillaUK Apr 10, 2026 +3
It's a perfect length. I don't need every show to be 26 episodes a season, when they tell such a fun story they can be short and I'm glad for it.
3
corndogs102 Apr 10, 2026 +75
It’s not cause we’ve had two decades of bad reboots (and there were some good ones in between that as well) it’s just we’ve come to a point where reboots arnt forced and trying to continually pander to nostalgia. All those reboots you named were created because the original creator worked on them all and decided he had an idea, along with a cast that cared about the material. They didn’t force a new season out. Plus with streaming they can take their time writing the show and making it good. Which is ironic cause Arrested Development had all the right materials to make the newer seasons good and they failed.
75
Argikeraunos Apr 10, 2026 +57
Arrested Development didn't really have the materials. They could only get the whole cast together for one shoot in season 4 and the weird structure is based around stretching that shoot as much as possible. But the problem is that a lot of the magic of that show is when the whole ensemble is together.
57
Megaclone18 Apr 10, 2026 +39
That doesn’t explain how season 5 was much worse even though it had more group scenes. Once you get past the weird character focused episode format season 4 actually had some classic AD moments (daddy needs to get his rocks off is an all time AD joke). Season 5 had nothing.
39
kaspar_trouser Apr 10, 2026 +10
I loved seasons 1-3 so much, was on the fence about 4, and I never finished season 5. It was just painful.
10
slusho55 Apr 10, 2026 +5
All the OG writers other than the showrunner were gone at that point. Cast also clearly didn’t want to be there for season 5
5
_Meece_ Apr 10, 2026 +2
I guess for me, wondering why AD was bad in Season 5. Is like wondering why the Rolling Stones aren't making stuff on the same level as their 60s/70s work.
2
Monk-ish Apr 10, 2026 +5
True, but Scrubs is missing like half of its regulars (Janitor, Kelso, Ted, Cox) and is still pretty remarkable. Even Carla is missing from like half the episodes
5
GeekAesthete Apr 10, 2026 +14
The difference is that Arrested Development was still using all those characters as central cast members, and having to write an entire season of an ensemble show around characters who can't be on set at the same time. Scrubs just accepted that JD, Turk, and Elliot are the only returning characters who are still regulars, wrote in new characters, and repurposed the others as recurring and guest roles. Plus, whereas Arrested Development really relied on the chemistry between the whole family, Scrubs has always had JD and Turk at its heart. That's a huge part of why Season 9 failed: without JD and Turk at the center, the show didn't work.
14
Argikeraunos Apr 10, 2026 +5
Yeah but the JD and Turk chemistry is powerful. Plus its like 8 episodes, if this were a 24 episode season like before it probably wouldn't work.
5
JoeDawson8 Apr 10, 2026 +2
Carla is on another show so that’s understandable
2
HeartFullONeutrality Apr 10, 2026 +2
I loved season 4. There are dozens of us, dozens!
2
kupozu Apr 10, 2026 +1
Oh damn, I just started watching arrested development some weeks ago. Should I stop at some season?
1
corndogs102 Apr 10, 2026 +2
Stop after season 3. Cause then Netflix bought the show and they’d try to reboot it… season 4 (original cut) is decent but season 5 was terrible. For many reasons. So watch at your own risk.
2
thejawa Apr 10, 2026 +12
Show runners and cast often get tired of doing a show for a long time, so they leave. Then some exec will say "Hey, know what made us money? This one show! Let's bring it back!" Then they hire different show runners and try to add a mix of a new main cast with a sprinkling of old cast so it feels like the same show. But with different writers and different directors, it's never gonna be the same. Then, at some point down the road the original team wants to get the band back together. They come and say "Hey, we got almost everyone originally involved back, let's do this." The execs would be insane not to say yes (see the current Buffy drama), so then the heart and soul of what made the show good to begin with returns.
12
Uncle_Bug_Music Apr 10, 2026 +37
I haven't seen Malcolm (that's for tonight and I can't wait) but I agree with you on KotH and Scrubs. At first watching Scrubs was a novelty and I liked it just for that. But as I kept watching a few more episodes I said to my wife, "This isn't a reboot at all; we're watching Scrubs again and it's f****** awesome!" It's as good as it ever was and it doesn't feel like they're reaching or winking that it's a reboot, it's just Scrubs and I'm loving the new characters who actually have depth.
37
Flimsy_Share_7606 Apr 10, 2026 +10
Yeah I agree, that's why it feels so good. It doesn't feel like a reboot. They just made another season. It's just "hey, there was a time skip, it's the future now, here is what is going on." It hasn't missed a beat.
10
-Midnight_Marauder- Apr 10, 2026 +8
"We're watching Scrubs again and it's f****** awesome" is my new favourite way I've heard the reboot described.
8
UnquestionabIe Apr 10, 2026 +2
I didn't realize Malcolm was out and been meaning to check out Scrubs (the original series was basically playing nonstop on one TV or another during my time away at college in the mid 2000s). Did absolutely love KotH and felt they nailed it, especially the ending of the first episode channeling those "returning somewhere familiar after being away for a few years" vibe. Have to see what they're all streaming on and hope they line up with what I have. Much as I enjoy those shows probably not going to add onto my existing subscriptions since I don't watch them nearly as much as I need to.
2
Calm-Maintenance-878 Apr 10, 2026 +10
I was impressed by Scrubs, didn’t take long to laugh out loud. I’m guessing they tried to keep with the original format as much as possible? I honestly don’t remember much of scrubs even though I’ve seen it all. Still, jumped back in like there wasn’t a 15 year gap. I’ve never seen the other two shows, so no two cents there.
10
Numerous1 Apr 10, 2026 +3
I’m loving scrubs revival but from what I’ve seen it’s kind of suffering from a combination of low budget/planning and having to juggle new and old characters.  Dr cox and Carla are guest appearances instead of full cast (due to their other shows I believe) and they don’t see to use the budget to do all the goody imagination things JD used to do every episode. But, it’s really hitting the spot still and I’m hoping it comes back for another season with me PF cast and budget. 
3
phenomenomnom Apr 10, 2026 +6
They may have also looked at Twin Peaks. Best follow up season ever
6
SommerMatt Apr 10, 2026 +10
The 1st episode of the SCRUBS re-launch had me a little worried. Seemed like it was forcing the humor and just trying too hard. By episode 3, I think, I was solidly hooked and everything was feeling much more natural. I actually really like the new cast of interns... and basically every other new character that's been added to the show. As much as we all loved Dr. Cox, I think it's a great decision to have him pass the torch and just GTFO. Also really enjoyed KOTH season 14 as well. Does it have the same animation budget as it used to? No. Are the stories and humor what you would have gotten from the original seasons? Absolutely. The whole timeline and explanation of Hank going to SA is a bit iffy as well, but it's just a means to an end. The time jump was also crucial to opening up new storylines. I'll take as much of it as I can get.
10
Dapaaads Apr 10, 2026 +3
They said cox Will have appearances in season 2
3
SommerMatt Apr 10, 2026 +9
That's fine. The fact that they didn't make EVERY SINGLE CHARACTER return in the exact same role was, IMHO, a great choice. The only guy right now that feels somewhat out of place in the 2026 reboot is "The Todd": he just seems too old (although I don't seem to mind Hootch for whatever reason).
9
HiphopopoptimusPrime Apr 10, 2026 +5
Here’s an example from the UK: Only Fool and Horses One of the most loved sitcoms. About a working class family struggling to make ends meet. They released a set of special episodes a few years after it ended. The final episode had them find an antique watch that made them millionaires. A happy ending that received acclaim from fans. Somehow, poverty returned. In 2003, they released more specials. The status quo was reset. Bad investments meant they were poor again and had to move back into their old flat. There weren’t any good jokes and fans try to forget they exist. There’s a lesson there probably. When we revisit something, we’d want to check in and see progress but also that everything’s ok. I have friends I haven’t seen for years. I hope they’re doing well though. Most recent revivals forgot the human need for connection and continuity. The connection with the characters was more important than more content. Star Wars. What was the point? Everyone we cared about died a failure. Great. It was like finding out your best friend from childhood had died. Or your friend who was struggling and found their feet had once again relapsed and died. Great. Picard is a washed up failure. Indiana Jones is a washed up failure. Great. What’s the point? What’s the meaning behind it? If I want to see people coping with disappointment and failure I’ll check in with my friends and family.
5
tgabs Apr 10, 2026 +3
The point, oftentimes, is to have the washed up failure pass the torch to the next (under contract, marketable) generation. Unfortunately they usually forget to make the next generation interesting characters.
3
NiceRabbit Apr 10, 2026 +10
I think it's because so many reboots tried to grab Gen Z. Like they'd all try for a revival where the main characters were there, but the show was really about the kids. It feels like, at least for Scrubs (my main window into the revivals), they decided to follow the original cast while incorporating new characters as b plots that not only add development for the new characters, but show growth/development for the originals. All these other shows like girl meets world were like, made with nods to the original but definitely trying to grab for a new audience rather than the old.
10
tilero1138 Apr 10, 2026 +3
As a Gen Z person, I hate when shows do that. I just want to see new episodes of an old show I discovered, not a different show. Even if I didn’t watch something when it first aired, I like it for the same reasons as older audiences did.
3
Wischiwaschbaer Apr 10, 2026 +19
Sorry to be pedantic, but reboots and revivals are not the same. Reboots tell the same or a similar story with a new cast, revivals continue the original story with the same cast.
19
AndNowAStoryAboutMe Apr 10, 2026 +11
I admire your pedantry. Useless as it may be.
11
Radix2309 Apr 10, 2026 +1
A reboot is just a restart of the series. It can be brand new continuity or just a continuation.
1
kpophistorian Apr 10, 2026 +5
koth s14 is definitely a cut above as a reboot, scrubs reboot is all antics not enough heart, and the way its shot and all the filtering and make up is another kind of cringe in itself and takes you right out of it, i'm not sure they can just keep doing the same thing
5
zeroxray Apr 10, 2026 +3
Excuse me but cobra kai premiered 8 years ago and a was pretty solid continuation of a 40 yr old movi. Well except for that last season which had its moments. First 2 seasons are perfect tho
3
HardcoreKaraoke Apr 10, 2026 +3
When it comes to Scrubs a big part of why it feels like old Scrubs is because of Zach/Donald's podcast. They specifically said that having a rewatch podcast reminded them of things and put them in a mindset to make the revival a faithful continuation of the story. I was so happy with how the KOTH revival turned out. It seemed risky with Hank's political views and being a bit too cringy with dealing with modern times. But I think they absolutely nailed making classic KOTH with a modern twist. The low hanging fruit jokes about modern society don't seem c****. I'm excited to watch the Malcolm reboot. I think the common denominator between these three shows is that the people behind them genuinely love the product. They enjoy their coworkers. They are proud of these shows. So it isn't like they're making new content just for money. The Malcolm actors weren't struggling for work, some were even out of Hollywood. The cast of KOTH and Judge were all involved in other projects so they didn't need the revival. The same goes for Scrubs where every main actor is involved in something else right now. It seems like everyone came back to those shows even though they didn't have to, minus Dewey (which is understandable and I respect why he didn't come back).
3
hoochiscrazy_ Apr 10, 2026 +5
I'm so f'ing happy the Scrubs reboot is actually good 🥲
5
SoftlySpokenPromises Apr 10, 2026 +3
The people who grew up on the shows are a lot more directly involved I would wager
3
Imperfect_Dark Apr 10, 2026 +3
I think people have just learned lessons. Mainly that it has to offer something new while rather than being pure nostalgia and nothing else.
3
shaunrundmc Apr 10, 2026 +3
You have the original heads and writers doing it and they are looking at where things went wrong witg other reboots
3
yanginatep Apr 11, 2026 +3
The new Mike Judge's Beavis And Butt-Head is also very good, some of the funniest stuff the franchise has ever done.
3
peanutmanak47 Apr 11, 2026 +2
Oh man, he's been absolutely killing it with the revival of that show. The addition of them being older was so damn smart and lead to some of the best episodes of the show. The "Old Cornholio" episode had me dying man.
2
DoomWad Apr 10, 2026 +15
I like the new scrubs
15
[deleted] Apr 10, 2026 +2
[deleted]
2
ArchDucky Apr 10, 2026 +2
24 had a good continuation that was immediately dropped on a cliff hanger. My favorite part was when Jack is on that chinese ship, surrounded and about to kill himself and then just gets so f****** angry and decides to murder like 30 people and chop the head off of the bad guy with a katana. It reminded me of Season 6 when Nurse Flowers leaves a crime scene from another rampage and just says "Jesus Jack". Thats a guy who was told you don't f*** with Jack but didn't take it seriously until he witnessed the aftermath himself. That was the look of a man that realized hes coworkers with a serial killer.
2
Ylsid Apr 10, 2026 +2
Beavis and Butthead too! It might legitimately be the funniest season, too
2
righteous4131 Apr 10, 2026 +2
Please. Reboot My Name is Earl. I am begging.
2
melvingoldfarb Apr 10, 2026 +2
I think the issue with Frasier was that even though he was the lead, what we really loved was his dynamic with his brother and father. Since neither appeared on the reboot it just wasn’t the same
2
Pitiful_Mouse_5225 Apr 10, 2026 +2
I hate that both Scrubs and Malcolm are doing the blurry background shit. It looks awful!
2
Derpykins666 Apr 10, 2026 +2
I think these are good because its not a reboot, they're all continuations. It's been like 20 years since the shows, there's a lot of new problems, references, and content they can have these characters cover. They were really good shows before, and the creators and actors of those shows love the characters they played. It's like nothing changed, but everything is different now, and that's a pretty relatable thing for the people who grew up watching those shows now.
2
lightspuzzle Apr 10, 2026 +2
i want a continuation to canceled tv series.not finished ones.
2
TemujinRi Apr 10, 2026 +2
I am once again here asking for a continuation of My Name is Earl.
2
Oerwinde Apr 10, 2026 +2
The number 1 rule of nostalgia sequels: Don't treat the original like it's something you need to apologize for. All the failed ones treat the original like it needs to be fixed.
2
sixtus_clegane119 Apr 11, 2026 +2
Twin peaks : the return
2
bill4935 Apr 11, 2026 +2
I liked the new Malcolm and KOTH episodes but they would have been even better if they found a part in the cast for Vanessa Bayer.
2
bruinslacker Apr 11, 2026 +2
Because the Reboot People are preparing for their Magnum opus: Firefly
2
Doombah Apr 12, 2026 +2
There's still a lot of nostalgia bait legacy sequels/continuations out there. I'm glad that Scrubs has been so good as its my favorite sitcom. The last episode made me SOB. It's been mostly good. Wasn't a fan of the "You can't come to the barbecue because you should grow up and meet new people" wrap up to that episode, but besides that it's been pretty great.
2
Noodlex87 Apr 12, 2026 +2
I personally feel that Malcolm was way stronger revival than Scrubs. Mostly because it is not interesting into creating something permanent by erasing the ending that we already had. Malcolm is just showing us how the characters face adulthood but maintaining the same anxiety, fears and shenanigans. Scrubs does not have anything new to say. And they were both my all time favorite sitcoms
2
Chenz Apr 10, 2026 +5
The reboots haven't gotten better, you're just old enough that the reboots are aimed at you
5
ImLaunchpadMcQuack Apr 10, 2026 +8
Nobody liked the Frasier reboot…
8
KeremyJyles Apr 10, 2026 +4
Because you found the flavour of memberberries you like.
4
AndNowAStoryAboutMe Apr 10, 2026 +3
I'm still bummed the X-Files revival wasn't successful enough to get me a Lauren Ambrose spinoff. Instead, we're getting a Ryan Coogler reboot I already have zero interest in. Bleh.
3
Taco145 Apr 10, 2026 +2
Dexter came back strong with Dexter New Blood but the ending was bad. They brought it back again retconnig what they'd said about Dexter dying and nailed the new series.
2
Impressive_Play_2599 Apr 10, 2026 +3
Seems they finally got to shows you enjoyed?
3
OhGr8WhatNow Apr 10, 2026 +1
Is the Malcolm reboot good? The ads for it looked stupid to me, so I've been unwilling to let it ruin my memory of the original
1
Sobotoc4311 Apr 10, 2026 +4
Honest opinion? Its fan service with a very weak plot, people who are just there to recreate jokes that landed better the first run, and rather interesting shoehorned pandering to connect to a new generation.  It was largely devoid of laughs, the timing felt off on punchlines, it has a modern apple film look to it instead of the gritty and grimy feel of the og.  It was by all accounts a reunion special masquerading as a reboot. To be fair that's all they intended it to be. Wouldve worked better as a two hour special rather than an episodic thing. Too many plot lines where none of them are explored and instead seems to center around a 40th anniversary party and thats pretty much it.  I had no expectations. It didnt disappoint. If you go in with them, it will. 
4
AndNowAStoryAboutMe Apr 10, 2026 +4
It was the best 100m of my morning. It is written so well. So many amazing lines. I'm excited to do a rewatch. It's short, 4 half hour episodes. It's beautiful and deep. But never not funny.
4
thomascoaker Apr 10, 2026 +1
New king of the hill wasn’t good for me. Felt like Internet imitators. Didnt even finish the batch of episodes. Watched quite a few. Have it ole ty of time. Wasn’t laughing at all. I kinda thought it just came and went and no one liked it. Never looked it up. Interesting to see it liked. What was I missing? One thing is I enjoy watching this with my kids and the new eps are way more edgy and make for awkward moments. Also it just wasn’t funny. When the world is a cartoon parody, cartoon parody doesn’t work maybe. Always loved Judge too. Going back to beavis and butthead.!
1
AndNowAStoryAboutMe Apr 10, 2026 +5
I never watched KotH until I watched the reboot. It was so good I started the original show and loved it, too.
5
-ShadowPuppet Apr 10, 2026 +1
Probably because the quality threshold for a comeback series has been raised after seeing examples of bad reboots and their repercussions.
1
Ok_SysAdmin Apr 10, 2026 +1
Wait did Malcolm drop? What's it on? I have seen no advertising.
1
rantingdemon Apr 10, 2026 +1
There is a frasier reboot?
1
AndNowAStoryAboutMe Apr 10, 2026 +2
It came and went, barely noticed, on a 6th tier streaming platform.
2
YepThatSal Apr 10, 2026 +1
Because these creators know the audiences that made the show successful wants to see the same characters instead of having the original characters show up for a couple of episodes to “pass the torch” to a new set of characters. These shows are talking to the original audience.
1
AhhBisto Apr 10, 2026 +1
I just watched the Malcolm In The Middle episodes and have been caught up on new Scrubs and really I think there are a few things that make them work now in comparison to other shows but really the main thing is they didn't try to reinvent the wheel whilst also making the shows feel like they had grown up with their audiences. It's a fine balance really that some of these shows don't get right. Frasier showed some of the growing parts with Freddy and David as grown men but the dynamic of the original show wasn't really there or replicated in any meaningful way.
1
aLegionOfDavids Apr 10, 2026 +1
I can only comment on Scrubs, from what I’ve read in media, it isn’t just that ‘Bill Lawrence is very talented’ it’s a lot of ‘Zach Braff and Donald Faison really wanted to do it, and do it well’. By their own words, their rewatch podcast was essentially a focus group for them on the original series where they could get tons of feedback on what worked and what didn’t, and they also supposedly watched like every reboot pilot/first few episodes for the last decade to see themselves what translated and what didn’t. I guess my point is, the main actors got to take some ownership of their work, they didn’t just take a script and get behind a camera, and they cared and fully bought into the new iteration of the show. Is the new Scrubs perfect, of course not, some of the new characters don’t hit for me, but it’s core soul still very much translates and is intact.
1
Popular-Jury7272 Apr 10, 2026 +1
Don't forget Dexter. I consider that show one of the founder's of true modern premium TV, and while it had its issues in later seasons, it is definitely back on top form. 
1
Ancient-Dust3077 Apr 10, 2026 +1
was malcolm in the middle that good?
1
MyStationIsAbandoned Apr 10, 2026 +1
original people working on the show. prioritizing the story and characters over political messaging like many modern shows. That's really it. If it's not the original people, it needs to be people *at the very least* who respect the original. It's so simple. you can still have your political messaging and it can even be one sided. But if it compromises the story or characters, you've ruined your show. We all know feminism can be great thing. A very much needed thing or else the west would would be a complete hellscape. You cannot deny this. But you also cannot deny that when used by over zealous, selfish, narcissistic, self righteous people, it ruins things. There are examples of great shows/movies where the messaging is heavy handed, but they're designed to make you think. The bad ones are obnoxious, try to tell you what to think, and imply that deviating from the opinion/ideology even a little bit means that you're evil and horrible. And no one wants to watch that except for other deranged people who blindly follow it like a cult. And there aren't enough of these people to keep the rating going. I'll eat the downvotes, but no matter much I get downvoted for pointing it out, it will not change reality.
1
Gasparde Apr 10, 2026 +1
Absolutely gorgeous show revivals. But I'm dreading the inevitable flood of horribly executed c**** ass cash grab attempts that are gonna taint a lot of good memories. I wonder when they'll announce King of Queens...
1
DeadpooI Apr 10, 2026 +1
Dexter falls i to this as well. The reboot of the show has been just as good as 1-3 imo.
1
bloody_william Apr 10, 2026 +1
Not if you ask people in the MitM sublistnook. Those people haven’t stopped bitching and picking it apart since it came out. I personally loved it! I think some fandoms will simply never be happy/don’t even want to be happy, I don’t know why people can’t just enjoy something without dissecting it to death.
1
AndNowAStoryAboutMe Apr 11, 2026 +2
I avoid all Fandoms. I avoid the kind of people who buy "merch" in general. I like Star Trek... so I better go buy a Star Trek shirt! Better put a replica space ship on my shelf and treat it like a family heirloom! Only fake fans use the term REAL FANS anyway.
2
Frylock304 Apr 10, 2026 +1
Malcom in the middle reboot is pretty bad, havent laughed once 3 episodes in
1
squeakybeak Apr 10, 2026 +2
I loved it, would deffo watch more.
2
Mahaloth Apr 11, 2026 +1
I just watched Malcolm in the Middle first new episode. It was hilarious.
1
pamplemouss Apr 11, 2026 +1
Could we get a s5 of Veronica mars that undoes the end of s4?
1
forkandspoon2011 Apr 11, 2026 +1
I mean... Scrubs and Kill of the Hill were Juggernauts of shows, some of the best television ever created. Scrubs original run still holds up and I would recommend everyone watch it.
1
caninehere Apr 11, 2026 +1
Imo it's because revivals have become common enough that they're no longer considered schlocky but potentially reinvigorating thanks to some high profile ones in recent years. That means getting not just washed up stars to join in but creatives involved in the originals, who often left later in the original runs of long running shows.
1
cal_guy2013 Apr 11, 2026 +1
FYI the Will & Grace revival was extremely popular in its first season especially the first couple of episodes.
1
Scykotica Apr 11, 2026 +1
I've heard that Scrubs is pretty bad. That's been purely fron secondhand accounts, though.
1
DoktorViktorVonNess Apr 11, 2026 +1
There have been good and bad revivals and reboots for decades. Dr Who revival was succesful in 2005, Twin Peaks Return was liked, Ducktales reboot was liked. Though there have been many bad ones that no one remembers.
1
RecommendsMalazan Apr 11, 2026 +1
Having now seen the Malcolm revival, it was good but not nearly as good as the King of the Hill or Scrubs revivals are.
1
barkev Apr 11, 2026 +1
i wish Lizzie McGuire would have gotten that mature reboot
1
zowietremendously Apr 12, 2026 +1
Reboots 🤮
1
SommerMatt Apr 12, 2026 +1
Just finished watching Scrubs episodes 7 and 8 and DAMN. They were both so good on multiple levels. As others have said, episode 8 had me getting misty-eyed. Also had a chance to watch the first three episodes of the Malcolm series and they have all been excellent as well. I think the secret to the success of both of these shows is a perfect mix of original characters with brand new ones that are really excellent in their own right: the new crop of interns on Scrubs are all great, as are Malcolm's daughter and girlfriend.
1
chuckfr Apr 12, 2026 +1
I can’t comment on Malcomn because I haven’t seen it yet. I enjoyed King of the Hill for the most part but wished they had addressed some of the main missing characters, particularly Luanne and Lucky. Bobby and Connie’s drifting apart didn’t quite make sense but I could buy it for the storyline. Scrubs I was expecting more considering Bill Lawrence. We find out that JD and Elliot have divorced. JD and Turk aren’t as close as they were. He hasn’t worked at the hospital in 10 years or so. He brings a patient in for care, stays overnight, and Cox says “I can’t teach these kids anymore, here are the keys, you’ll make a good head of medicine, I’m out”. So JD just say “Sure” and closes his practice. None of the new characters have registered on the interesting meter with me. And like with KotH they haven’t haven’t addressed the missing characters: Ted and Kelso. Sure the former could be mentioned to be living in Hawaii or singing in Disney World.
1
← Back to Board