· 57 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 23, 2026 at 1:38 PM

Mamdani Urges Warner Bros. Shareholders to Vote 'No' on Paramount Merger: 'Thousands of Jobs at Risk'

Posted by Silly-avocatoe


Mamdani Urges Warner Bros. Shareholders to Vote 'No' on Paramount Merger: 'Thousands of Jobs at Risk'
TheWrap
Mamdani Urges Warner Bros. Shareholders to Vote 'No' on Paramount Merger: 'Thousands of Jobs at Risk'
New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani voiced his opposition to the planned Warner Bros.-Paramount merger, saying it's bad for New Yorkers.

🚩 Report this post

57 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
olearyboy Apr 23, 2026 +248
Cool cool, I’m not sure the shareholders care about jobs
248
DigLivid1350 Apr 23, 2026 +38
You can be sure about your statement
38
NYIsles55 Apr 23, 2026 +26
They care very much about jobs. The less people they have to pay the better for them.
26
MentalDisintegrat1on Apr 23, 2026 +10
Funny I don't care about shareholders
10
olearyboy Apr 23, 2026 +9
I wish that was true, but nearly everyones retirement funds are tied into indexes that contain these shitty stocks
9
Mrs_SmithG2W Apr 23, 2026 +11
There is no reason why our economic system cannot include ethics, a thought for the greater good, people and planet before profit, but still profit. It is a made up system by humans in the first place, that is and always was incompatible with our natural system of earth. Infinite growth on a finite planet doesn’t work and we are seeing the consequences of this mismatch more and more, day by day. We will need to find a new way forward regardless, we might as well start now! 💪🏼🌍🖖🏼
11
TheWorclown Apr 23, 2026 +5
The problem is just wealth addiction. It simply isn’t enough to have a lot, because these people view themselves in direct competition with others who have a lot. They need more than them, and every time you scratch that tangible itch of monetizing everything, the addiction gets worse.
5
olearyboy Apr 23, 2026 +3
The answer has always existed - caps Force companies to split into independent organizations before they become too large. There's no way to become large without becoming evil
3
BowlEducational6722 Apr 23, 2026 +85
I hope the WB curse is real and that Paramount chokes on it.
85
welltherewasthisbear Apr 23, 2026 +40
I think that Netflix saw Paramount’s move and thought that if they wait they can get 2 studios with big IP in a liquidation sale in the future.
40
olearyboy Apr 23, 2026 +12
Oh it's real - I was in AOL when they 'bought' Time Warner. AOL lied, Time Warner spent the next decade trying to crush AOL which it was doing to itself, and it spawned iTunes because it wanted to not sell catalogue access to AOL and gave it to Apple because they believed Apple was a niche hardware company that wouldn't do anything with it.... \*steps down from soapbox\*
12
neverendingchalupas Apr 23, 2026 +7
Paramount will expect consumers to be responsible for the massive amount of debt, so expect... rate increases, reduction in quality of service, and loss of content. I canceled awhile ago. The merger shouldnt be allowed, but oh well.
7
tonybananaman Apr 23, 2026 +2
I need to cancel mine as well. I only use it for SpongeBob
2
Blacknite45 Apr 23, 2026 +13
With the debt the company got in, the mass job loss was inevitable. 
13
ConstructionRare4123 Apr 23, 2026 +6
Shareholders don’t care about jobs they care about money
6
johnn48 Apr 23, 2026 +8
The problem with Capitalism is its primary premise that “Greed is Good!” So the shareholders will vote for the merger, but will vote against executive payouts. So it fuels innovation, but doesn’t fuel social welfare unless creatively framed.
8
toddywithabody Apr 23, 2026 +46
I’m a shareholder and voted no. Honestly I will make money if the deal goes through but not that much. It was a pretty shitty offer. I assume it’ll go through but f*** em, I voted no. Not that my measly shares will move the needle at all
46
zooorrt Apr 23, 2026 +15
Same. And the letter they wrote pushing the vote was disgusting.
15
TanAllOvaJanAllOva Apr 23, 2026 +6
Ya, the thing shareholders care about—-other people’s jobs
6
CaliggyJack Apr 23, 2026 +2
You need to tell them why the merger is bad for business, not about people they don't care about losing their job.
2
BusyView6617 Apr 23, 2026 +2
There are those that still have morals, and they need to keep speaking out so the public knows there's a better way. The younger generations are going to be part of the solution here because they see what the situations is and aren't buying into it. They will be the ones who hopefully start voting to get the changes they want, and in the process start cleaning up thus mess. Once people see what could be, the different groups will join together and change will occur.
2
SageofLogic Apr 23, 2026 +2
shareholders don't have consciences silly
2
braxin23 Apr 23, 2026 +1
Indeed they don’t.
1
Adequate_Images Apr 23, 2026 +2
And they all said “f*** you commie! I’m getting mine!”
2
MrShadowKing2020 Apr 23, 2026 +2
Unfortunately, the shareholders chose to be greedy sociopaths.
2
keytiri Apr 23, 2026 +2
Doubtful it’s hard for the “ownership class” to resist selling out for a quick buck. My uncle is in finance, something in private equity, I was internally aghast when he recommended that my father sell his clinic to a “roll-up.” Dad’s in a bit of a tough spot since none of us kids followed him into healthcare and he had the unfortunate choice of setting up in a red state (got what he voted for imo). I do think he’s realized he made a bit of a mistake and that’s why he’s still “working,” but that doesn’t really change his predicament. Fortunately my brother and his wife are local to them atm, and I’ve been urging parents to treat them better; they seem to think we can afford to wait for “our turn,” while the people they voted for run the country into the ground.
2
SidJag Apr 23, 2026 +2
“They didn’t” Narrator from Arrested Development, cue theme
2
Sc0825 Apr 23, 2026 +5
Remember when they said that this guy would turn out to be a terrible person. Funny how he isn’t and those who spoke against him are
5
AdVegetable8056 Apr 23, 2026 +8
I'm a Mamdani supporter, but even I know that the shareholders are obviously gonna unanimously approve this merger. I don't understand why he's talking about this. Can't wait for conservatives acting like this is gonna be a huge fail for Mamdani today.
8
[deleted] Apr 23, 2026 +1
[removed]
1
toddywithabody Apr 23, 2026 +6
His mother is Mira Nair? She’s a great director. Check out Mississippi Masala. Great Denzel performance and amazing movie.
6
BergmanGirl Apr 23, 2026 +8
He's a big movie guy. His mom's a director. This merger is bad for movies as a whole, bad for workers in the industry, and honestly bad for democracy as a Trump-friendly media company consolidates power in the film industry. He's not going to have much sway probably, but it takes very little to speak on this.
8
nonsensestuff Apr 23, 2026 +4
You don’t think NYC — a major hub for tv/movie production— would be impacted by this?? Not only are the people who work as talent or crew impacted, but the businesses that support the productions are too— down to the place they order lunch from.
4
Entire_Dog_5874 Apr 23, 2026 +4
Because there are thousands of related jobs here along with the headquarters at 1515 Broadway. Try to keep up.
4
Mrs_SmithG2W Apr 23, 2026 +6
Yes. This is what we need- a fearless fighter for the people with moral clarity. More of this please!💪🏼🌍🖖🏼
6
CarolinaPanthers2015 Apr 23, 2026 +2
I'm with him all the way because we're just ABSOLUTELY gonna be cooked just ONLY for a while if Warner Bros. makes that super duper grave mistake in approving that merger with Paramount. They just REALLY gotta make sure that they are sending a strong message to Paramount, telling them that they are all good with everything that they really do have right up to this point.
2
s1105615 Apr 23, 2026 +1
I’m gonna vote yes even harder now
1
Alarmed_Drop7162 Apr 23, 2026 +1
They can’t hear you over the Saudi kaching sounds.
1
Wise-Locksmith-6438 Apr 23, 2026 +1
Good for him to say no
1
TheFumingatzor Apr 23, 2026 +1
But what about my portfolio?
1
TemperateStone Apr 23, 2026 +1
Mergers always come with lay-offs.
1
chrisking345 Apr 23, 2026 +1
Meanwhile at the shareholders sit down: “I’m told we can eliminate 1000’s of jobs if we go through with this”
1
waveduality Apr 24, 2026 +1
He’s asking to keep workers simply on the basis of keeping workers, and not because it makes business sense.
1
Gamerxx13 Apr 23, 2026
haha when do shareholders care about people’s jobs
0
Comfortable-Bug7202 Apr 23, 2026
Uh no matter who bought it there was gonna be huge cuts...why did people wait til now... wasn't any outcry whem fox was killed off
0
addctd2badideas Apr 23, 2026 -9
Aside from some film industry jobs in NYC (but nowhere close to what it used to be with operations having moved to other cities providing incentives), why is the mayor doing weighing in on this? Dude, stop sipping your own Kool-Aid and run your city.
-9
MasterDave Apr 23, 2026 +6
WB has a fuckton more than "some film industry jobs" in NYC. It's at least 10k employees. They've got an entire corporate HQ in NYC, which would be fully redundant when Paramount starts gutting the company. They run a lot of CNN out of NY for obvious reasons, they staff most of their websites out of NY I mean holy fuckballs just shut up if you don't know shit for shit.
6
addctd2badideas Apr 23, 2026 -4
I forgot about CNN. Point taken.
-4
noguarantee1234 Apr 23, 2026 +2
Hes the mayor of the largest (by population) city in the United States. Him speaking out is much more powerful than the mayor of say...Boise, Idaho lol. They are running the city and fighting for what they believe is right anyway they can.
2
addctd2badideas Apr 23, 2026 -3
My point is, that a mayor of any city isn't really in a position to be speaking out. He has no real ability to do much or enact legislation that is capable of saving those jobs. Again, he's got a LOT to do for the city right now and needs to focus on that. It's what he was elected to do.
-3
noguarantee1234 Apr 23, 2026 +3
It effects New Yorkers, and it takes very little time to express his nonsupport. He has been working on the city as well. Its not hard to do both.
3
addctd2badideas Apr 23, 2026
Is it? My job isn't nearly as important as his, but it feels like there's never enough hours in a day to complete everything. Also, it's "affects."
0
noguarantee1234 Apr 23, 2026 +2
God, you're pompous lol. Have a good day.
2
LauraPalmersMom430 Apr 23, 2026
His mother is Mira Nair, an incredible director.
0
addctd2badideas Apr 23, 2026 +2
I.. was not aware of that. Cool! At least there's a personal connection to this issue. But I'm still going to say that it shouldn't be a rhetorical focus right now when he's got so much to do otherwise. And I like Mamdani too. I want to give him the benefit of the doubt. But I also have a long enough memory to remember all the other mayors of New York City who were super popular in the beginning, and ignored their actual job and people turned on them pretty quickly.
2
fuck-nazi Apr 23, 2026 -6
“Man tells people to vote against best financial interest”
-6
Civil_Zone8137 Apr 23, 2026 +4
Who’s best financial interests? Oh, that’s right, the billionaires. Not the people working for these companies who are about to lose their jobs with zero severance pay. Slow clap for you.
4
← Back to Board