· 159 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 7, 2026 at 7:22 PM

Man who firebombed a demonstration in Colorado, killing 1, is sentenced to life in prison

Posted by ThatMasterpiece2174


Man who firebombed a demonstration in Colorado, killing 1, is sentenced to life in prison
AP News
Man who firebombed a demonstration in Colorado, killing 1, is sentenced to life in prison
A man was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole after pleading guilty to killing one person and injuring a dozen others while they were demonstrating in Boulder, Colorado, in support of Israeli hostages in Gaza.

🚩 Report this post

159 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
BiBoFieTo 3 days ago +618
> Soliman offered apologies to the victims and condolences for Diamond’s death. “There are no words that can express my sadness for her passing,” Soliman said. You set someone on fire on-purpose, but you're sad that they died?
618
Dr_Porknbeef 3 days ago +235
Cold iron bars clear one's mind.
235
Siegfoult 3 days ago +154
"There are no words that can express my sadness for facing consequences."
154
non-squitr 3 days ago +23
I get the metaphor but it's time. You suddenly have all the time in the world and almost nothing to do other than think of what led you to that cell.
23
theuncleiroh 3 days ago +88
Yes, people can feel guilt. Doesn't mean they deserve no punishment, nor that you must forgive them. Just that people can do a thing and realize that they did wrong, whatever their original intent was It's really not that confusing that such a thing could happen. He said he deserves the maximum sentence-- he said he would deserve death, though it's not allowed in Colorado-- and that he did a horrible thing, to people he does not believe deserved it, out of a desire to take revenge for other horrible things. A person can be sad because bad things are happening, because they responded to those bad things in a bad way, and that his bad response resulted in the death of a person who he does not feel personal animus against, and yet chose to kill. It doesn't redeem him, it just shows that he is human and that it is human to make mistakes that do immense harm-- and to accept punishment for those actions.
88
UpplystCat 2 days ago +8
She died from the burns THREE WEEKS later after what her sons in a statement called “indescribable pain.”
8
VagabondTexan 2 days ago +18
He said the nice words and then went on a rant that showed he didn't hat all mean the nice words. Screw him. He wants the federal death penalty. I think he wants to be a martyr. He's one I'm willing to pay taxes to let him rot in the Supermax.
18
aarkwilde 3 days ago +16
Sad he got caught.
16
Pottski 2 days ago +6
“I’m sorry I was caught” All tactics for leniency and nothing else.
6
thedarkherald 1 day ago +2
No words needed. Hard labor or execution.
2
ButterRollercoaster 3 days ago +1
Are you unfamiliar with the concept of remorse?
1
VagabondTexan 1 day ago +6
Me? Of course. He, might have been believable had he kept his mouth shut after "I'm sorry".
6
Evo119 2 days ago -1
People can feel guilty for actions they took.
-1
PPMD_IS_BACK 3 days ago +58
“An attack motivated by someone’s political views is not considered a hate crime by federal law?” Sorry maybe I’m just not fully awake yet but… wtf?
58
VagabondTexan 2 days ago +35
Politics is not a protected class like race, religion, gender, sexual preference, and whatever else I'm missing. So it's less bad to commit crimes against Zionists just as long as you didn't go after them because they are Jews. At least that seems to be the logic
35
wewladendmylife 1 day ago -7
Zionists aren't a protected class
-7
VagabondTexan 1 day ago +7
And yet, I guarantee you "Zionism" was not why he was out there. Its just a convenient excuse to avoid the charge.
7
wewladendmylife 1 day ago -4
The majority of Zionists are not Jews
-4
restbest 3 days ago +323
What a sick individual, it was a demonstration for victims of oct 7, pure antisemitism just wanted to attack Jews. Life is more than warranted
323
Geordi87 3 days ago +89
With antisemitism growing at such a rapid rate as it is now, we will continue to see senseless acts of violence like this for a long time.
89
lacegem 3 days ago +103
It really must suck being Jewish right now. It feels like antisemitism is more mainstream than I've ever seen it in my lifetime. And it wasn't like it was a slow build-up, it's like a switch got flipped and millions of people realized it was okay to admit to a hate they had been hiding all along. It's no longer just skinheads and conspiracy nutjobs, it's a *lot* of ordinary people.
103
TintedApostle 3 days ago +59
The issue is that many Jews - myself included - are against the actions of the Israeli government, but people can’t or won’t distinguish that from anti-semitism. Those that can’t aren’t thinking and those that won’t have some kind of agenda.
59
mjohnsimon 2 days ago +4
I mean, to many people, speaking out against the Israeli government *is* antisemitism. Hell, several state governments tried or have passed laws to recognize it as such.
4
TintedApostle 1 day ago +5
They can say that, but they really are demonstrating infidelity of the mind. They are using the term "anti-semitism" to shut down discussion of the actions of a government. They know what they say is manipulative. “Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and prostituted the chastity of his mind, as to subscribe his professional belief to things he does not believe, he has prepared himself for the commission of every other crime.” ― Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason
5
mehtorite 18 hr ago +1
Do they seriously have a problem with antisemitism or are they just trying to throw some disingenuous claims to try to have a zinger to hurl at people who speak out against genocide?
1
slamminalex1 2 days ago -20
The actual issue is that many people, like yourself, conflate the Israeli government with Zionism. Those 2 are not the same. Antizionism is antisemitism. Anti-Israeli government is not antizionism.
-20
TintedApostle 2 days ago +10
People like myself? Hmmm
10
RainbowCrane 2 days ago +5
Not a Jew or otherwise Semitic. I don’t conflate Zionism with the Israeli government. But I do think that it’s a serious mistake to claim that folks who are against Zionism - that is, against the idea of a Jewish homeland in the Levant - are by definition antisemitic. I’m against partitioning the Middle East based on religion. I don’t believe that promises in the Hebrew Bible have any meaning in a modern political context, any more than I believe that the British monarchy is divinely ordained or that the Pope deserves secular authority based on his claims to bear Peter’s authority. In the modern political environment claims of antisemitism are used way too frequently to shut down debate about the morality of Israeli policy, or about the way Zionist settlers treat the (also Semitic) Palestinians. Unfortunately this abuse of the label of antisemitism also obscures the actual rampant antisemitism on the part of white supremacist right wing Americans.
5
slamminalex1 2 days ago +4
Every major religion in this world has a “safe space” in this world. Israel is the Jewish people’s safe space. Everywhere else in the world, if you are Jewish (like myself), there is a decent chance you will encounter antisemitism in some way shape or form. Israel is the one place that is guaranteed not to happen if you are Jewish. Why are you against the Jewish people being the only major religious group to not have a safe homeland to go? Muslims do. Christians do. Hindus do. But only when it comes to Jewish people is when the rest of the world has a problem.
4
RainbowCrane 2 days ago -4
I’m against religion being the basis of political decisions. If there were a way to create a non-populated state that Jews could have to live in unbothered by non-Jews, that would be one ethical question. But that’s not what happened with Israel. Zionism uses religious beliefs to claim dominion over land that had not been under the rule of Jews for centuries, and to claim the right to take that land from other Semitic people who had lived there - Palestinians have an equivalent moral claim to the land as their homeland as do Jews who had remained, and more claim than Jews of the diaspora. You mentioned Hindus. Current Indian politics are a great demonstration of the dangers of allowing religion to creep into government policy. Modi uses Hindu nationalism to justify horrible policies against Muslims, and to make excuses for local people who commit violence against Muslims who eat meat or engage in other acts that violate Hindu beliefs. Despite India being founded as an explicitly secular state it has diverged from that path into religious extremism. And part of the problem in India is the same as in Israel: British colonial powers drew boundaries without regard for the diverse population who lived there.
-4
slamminalex1 2 days ago +3
The problem with this framing is that it treats Zionism as if it was purely a religious project, when a huge part of Zionism was actually secular nationalism. Early Zionist leaders were often secular or even atheist Jews responding to centuries of persecution, pogroms, and exclusion in Europe and the Middle East. Jews didn’t suddenly invent a connection to the land in the 1900s because of religion…there had been continuous Jewish presence there for thousands of years, even after expulsions and conquests. Also, saying diaspora Jews had “less claim” than Palestinians gets morally messy fast. Most people don’t apply that standard to any other displaced ethnic group. Nobody says Armenians in diaspora stopped being Armenian after centuries, or that indigenous groups lose identity if they were forcibly scattered. Jews maintained language, culture, religion, and identity tied specifically to that land for literally millennia. And Palestinians absolutely have a real attachment and claim too. That’s why the conflict is tragic. Two groups with legitimate historical ties ended up competing over the same territory. But acknowledging Jewish indigeneity and national identity is not the same thing as endorsing every action of the Israeli government. The India comparison also kind of breaks down because Hindu nationalism is the majority religion dominating minorities inside an already established state. Zionism emerged from Jews being a stateless minority almost everywhere on earth. Those are very different historical situations. And the British boundary argument leaves out that Jews didn’t just arrive because Britain randomly drew lines on a map. There were already Jewish communities there, plus large waves of legal immigration and land purchases before 1948. You can criticize specific expulsions, settlements, or policies without rewriting the entire Jewish historical connection to the region as some colonial fantasy invented out of religion.
3
RainbowCrane 2 days ago
But 21st century Zionism is not a secular project. Any political debate regarding illegal settlements in Palestine is filled with extremist Jewish Zionists who believe that they have a right to settle as they were promised that land in Hebrew scripture. Evangelical Christians have joined the Zionist cause because they (Christians) believe that the Jews must return to the Holy Land in order to fulfill the prophecy in Revelation. And though other diasporas maintain a connection to their homeland, Jewish Zionism has used that connection to force others off of the land and oppress non-Jewish populations. I’m not claiming that it’s a one sided conflict, Palestinians backed by extremist Islamic political forces in Saudi Arabia, Iran and elsewhere would likely wipe out Israeli settlers if the US quit backing Israel with our military. But every time secular politicians have tried to work on a compromise solution Jewish religious extremists in the Knessset have used their religious beliefs to justify complete intransigence. As the occupying power in the region it is in Israel to be unbiased in their governance, and no reasonable person can claim that Israel has given equal consideration to Jewish settlers and Palestinians.
0
Evo119 2 days ago +2
It is not. Anti-zionism is not anti-semitism. This is an unbelievably stupid and tired argument.
2
slamminalex1 2 days ago +2
Good argument... You’re wrong. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
2
Hesitation-Marx 3 days ago +40
It hasn’t been a good time.
40
The_Bitter_Bear 3 days ago +30
It's been so frustrating to see and so many people now shout down/ignore legitimate concerns of antisemitism.
30
noodleexchange 3 days ago -2
Trying to shout over war crimes …
-2
skullpie 3 days ago
Its really too bad how many legitimate concerns turn out to be illegitimate. Huge problem in the UK at the moment.
0
makingnoise 3 days ago +3
The problem with the UK is about 4 million huge.
3
TheKingICouldBecome 2 days ago -1
It's like the boy who cried wolf. When people try to claim any and all criticism of any Jewish person or action is anti-semitism, people stop taking the allegations seriously, then the legitimate ones don't get the attention they should.
-1
idiot500000 3 days ago +19
It's always been a lot of ordinary people, that's the problem
19
DeadEyedCretin 3 days ago +31
Thank Israel for that. I'm sane and don't equate all Jewish people to those waging genocide currently, but it really isn't good for their image.
31
RentInside7527 3 days ago +11
The fault of bigotry is bigots, not Israel. Youre enabling the same conflation you claim to be sane and avoid.
11
DeadEyedCretin 3 days ago +13
I'm trying to provide a possible explanation for the rise in antisemitism. It becomes more popular at the same time Israel becomes a major part of the news cycle? They're definitely linked.
13
MacAttacknChz 3 days ago +11
There are other genocides going on in the world right now, yet populations who have a slim relationship with those countries don't face hate. Uyghurs are facing a genocide, but it's not translating to anti-Chinese sentiment.
11
Greedy-Half-4618 2 days ago +5
yep or russia trying to take over Ukraine et al, no one out there is calling for the dismantling of Russia or holding all Russians responsible.
5
SchemeMoist 3 days ago -4
That's because the Chinese government and its supporters aren't going around saying that all Chinese people are pro-genocide and if you speak out about the genocide, you hate all Chinese people.
-4
Sumeriandawn 3 days ago +4
👴" It sucks Islamophobia was the on rise after 9-11. I don't blame all Muslims for terrorist attacks. Btw, did you 9-11 was committed by Muslims? We should fight harder to combat Islamophobia. Lots of people are angry at Muslims because of 9-11 and other attacks. Too many people are bashing Muslims. Bigots hate them because of 9-11. 9-11 lead to more Islamophobia. Btw, there's more hate against against Muslims now because some Muslims attacked the WTC. Blame al-Qaeda for the rise in Islamophobia. " 👧🤔 "What the?"
4
DeadEyedCretin 3 days ago +9
9/11 did directly contribute to islamophobia, as do organizations like ISIS. You live in a fantasy world if you can't understand that. No it isn't right, but it happens.
9
Sumeriandawn 2 days ago
👨 "Did you hear about what Robert Bowers did?" DeadEyedCretin 👴" What about what Israel did?" 🤔😂
0
noodleexchange 3 days ago +4
Nailed the hypocrisy
4
YankMi 3 days ago -8
You're not trying to provide an explanation. You're trying to assign blame.
-8
sagittariuslegend 3 days ago +12
Israel is directly to blame.
12
Mamamama29010 3 days ago +3
No, bigots are. If Israel being in the news is fueling your antisemitism, you’re already just a bigoted POS to begin with.
3
SchemeMoist 3 days ago +14
It's not Israel being in the news. It's all the Israel supporters going around saying that if you are against the actions of the Israeli government, you are antisemitic. Equating being Jewish with being pro-genocide, which obviously isn't true. But ignorant people who have been inundated with that message from Israel supporters for years have started to believe it.
14
ChiefKT9002 3 days ago
They’re not just ‘in the news’ are they? They’re in the news for being genociders. I wonder why people start to hate them hmm…
0
Evo119 2 days ago
Being against the actions of the Israeli government is not anti-semitism. It is attitudes like yours that push people to not differentiate between the Israeli government and Jews as a whole.
0
YankMi 3 days ago +1
Like watching turds float to the surface.
1
noodleexchange 3 days ago -7
A state run by hegemonic Zionist criminals is to blame - their systematic indoctrination through propaganda is a recruiting campaign
-7
ConsciousResolution8 3 days ago +9
You can apply that same mentality to several sovereign states that are embroiled in conflicts currently.
9
noodleexchange 3 days ago
False assertion. I don’t recall seeing people fired over Hutu or Tutsi affiliation
0
YankMi 3 days ago +1
Thank you for providing an example to my words.
1
noodleexchange 1 day ago +1
Every word I spoke is true. 'Blame' is one thing, root causes another. Are Ukranians 'terrorists' for fighting back? Are Canadians 'terrorists' for holding Russia to account? The identity collapse of Israeli state actions with Judaism is the most despicable psyop ever.
1
Party_Ad_785 3 days ago -14
Pro Israeli Jews are never going to understand this, friend. To them it is fine to set the world against the tribe if it means Bibi gets another few years in power.
-14
SchemeMoist 3 days ago -7
Israel and its supporters equate hate for the actions of Israel as antisemitism. So yes, Israel and its supporters are very much encouraging antisemitism. Israel supporters are basically saying that all Jews are pro-genocide, and some dummies believe them.
-7
RentInside7527 3 days ago -2
>Immigrants and immigration reform advocates equate the enforcement of the US's immigration laws and a desire for secure boarders with anti-mexican/Latin american racism and some dummies believe them. Therefore Latin Americans and their supporters are to blame for anti-latin American racism and anti-immigrant bigotry. Thats your rn, and the dopamine hits you receive from your comment are provided to you by bigots who want their bigotry excused.
-2
SchemeMoist 3 days ago +6
I'm not excusing antisemitism. I'm just saying that the proliferate propaganda that Israel and its supporters have been deploying on the US for decades has an effect. It worked in their favor for a long time, and even more people fell for it that way. But now that Israel has gotten so brazen with their monstrous behavior, some people are hearing the propaganda the other way. Israel and its supporters are actively hurting Jewish people by equating their conduct to Judaism, ON PURPOSE. If you think Bibi and other purporters of this message want to STOP antisemitism, you would be mistaken. They like having antisemitism be a problem, so they can use it as cover from criticism from their crimes. Of course this is on a post about actual, extremely harmful and terrible, antisemitism. But the weaponization of accusations of antisemitism is going to have an effect. The country has spent years listening to prominant people on the news every day, multiple times a day, saying that protesters against genocide are antisemitic. That people who do not support Israel's illegal settlements and murder of civilians in multiple countries are antisemitic. That people who are upset about seeing children with sniper bullets in their skulls and children who are actively being starved by the Israeli government are antisemitic. When you are pounding the message into the heads of the American people that all of that is equal to Judaism, it will have an effect. And like I said, it is intentional by those in power who are supporters of Israel. Supporters of immigration do not weaponize claims of racism to commit war crimes.
6
RentInside7527 3 days ago
Blaming the targets of bigotry on the weaponization of the accusation of bigotry serves only to excuse bigots. I dont support illegal settlements or the killing of innocent people, yet I experience antisemitism from people who hide behind the claim that theyre just opposing genocide. The fact is, the propalestinian movement has a pretty terrible track record of policing actual antisemitism within its ranks, and your narrative that thats somehow my fault is providing further cover for the actual antisemites within your movement's midst. Double standards also reveal prejudice and bias. So much focus is put on Israeli influence campaign while the same groups simultaneously ignore the documented history of Qatar's illegal funneling of money into western universities to influence how the conflict is taught, or Irans documented wide use of bot farms and social media influencing campaigns. The thing is, with the broader Arab-Israeli conflict and most other major conflicts, both sides are trying to manipulate amd influence public opinion. The fact that people think that one side and its supporters are the only ones attempting to influence public opinion through deception reveals underlying biases that precede that attempt at influence. You're still just providing cover for bigots. The answer to bigotry is to call out bigots, no questions asked, no equivocation, no whataboutism. That is the reaction the left has demanded for all bigotry it has opposed until it came to Jews.
0
SchemeMoist 3 days ago +9
>Blaming the targets of bigotry on the weaponization of the accusation of bigotry Kind of proving my point here lol. I'm not blaming Jewish people or Judaism for antisemitism. I'm saying Israel and its supporters stoke antisemitism, a lot of times on purpose. You're equating Judaism with Israel, yet again. There are more Christian Zionists than there are total Jewish people, and those Christian Zionists are just as much to blame as Jewish Zionists. There is more than one thing to blame in every situation. Bigots are bigots, of course. If a white supremacist was stoking antisemitism in other people, would you say that white supremacist played a role in the other person's antisemitism? Or do you see everything in a vacuum and refuse to believe that people can have influence on other people? Just like nazi groups and white supremacist groups stoke antisemitism, so do Zionists.
9
Evo119 2 days ago
Nobody claimed Israel was the only state producing propaganda or manipulating social influence.
0
Evo119 2 days ago
No. The issue is zionists conflating antisemitism with criticism of the Israeli government. Those are two very different things.
0
RentInside7527 2 days ago +1
3 D's test
1
Sumeriandawn 3 days ago +5
"I don't hate all Jews. I like the good ones"
5
noodleexchange 3 days ago -2
War crimes enthusiasts
-2
thewavefixation 3 days ago
You are tho a person that instantly extrapolated a political situation into a justification for violence against Jewish people. It really isn't a good look for your 'hey i don't hate ALL Jews' brand.
0
SchemeMoist 3 days ago +3
Israel and its supporters equate hate for the actions of Israel as antisemitism. When those involved in a political situation say that if you're not okay with genocide, you must hate all Jews, yes, that will lead to ignorant people believing them that all jews are pro-genocide.
3
thewavefixation 3 days ago +5
Lmao 'you f****** jews forced me to be an antisemite!'
5
SchemeMoist 3 days ago +10
I'm not saying the actions of Israel should make people hate Jews. I'm saying that supporters of Israel, which up until maybe a year or so ago was the majority of the US, have been constantly saying that Israel = Jews and all Jews are pro-genocide. And some ignorant people believed them rather than directing their hate where it belongs. ETA: you actually just did this as well. I said Israel and its supporters (more Christians are supporters of Israel than Jews), you said Jews. Israel does not speak for all jews.
10
[deleted] 3 days ago -21
[deleted]
-21
DeadEyedCretin 3 days ago +8
I'm not antisemetic, I just believe that Israel is responsible for this rise in antisemitism
8
[deleted] 3 days ago -5
[deleted]
-5
DeadEyedCretin 3 days ago +9
Their government and military forsure. But a lot of people in Israel seem to support what's going on.
9
GGuesswho 3 days ago -1
From what I can tell the support for the current war in Gaza is rabid amongst the Israeli nationals
-1
OK_x86 3 days ago -8
There's a huge difference between criticism of a state's actions and hatred of an ethnic group. If we can criticize the treatment of the Uyghur by the Chinese with being sinophobic then surely we can criticize Israel's behavior in the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria without being anti semitic. The problem is that all of these events do feed into anti semitic narratives about Jews, like the predominance of pro Israeli PACs and lobbies in American politics, the special treatment Israel seems to enjoy in American news media, and the equating of criticism of Israel with anti semitism. It all fundamentally erodes the meaning of anti semitism whole ironically giving new wind to anti semitism globally.
-8
Qorazon 3 days ago +8
It’s not to okay to hate Jews. Israel and who and how it’s being run is a valid target. That’s just what I’ve found.
8
ngunter7 3 days ago -8
Apparently you’re not allowed to say anything against Israel
-8
noodleexchange 3 days ago -8
Yet we constantly hear that 85% of Jews ‘support’ Israel - the language and ideology are suffering a collapse - a deliberate one
-8
UrWifesFriend92 2 days ago +1
Well when all of our money goes to Israel while they bomb and kill people it makes it really easy to hate
1
noodleexchange 3 days ago -4
Genocide will do that to attitudes in an orderly society
-4
MacAttacknChz 3 days ago +12
Except Jewish people and Isrealis are not the same. There are other genocides going on in the world right now, yet populations who have a slim relationship with those countries don't face hate. Uyghurs are facing a genocide, but it's not translating to anti-Chinese sentiment.
12
noodleexchange 3 days ago -5
False assertion
-5
whipplej 3 days ago -14
"a switch got flipped" What switch was that?
-14
Still-Cash1599 3 days ago -35
Evidence of Isreal buying and selling children as sex slaves to gain influence in other countries. Anyone that has sent a dollar to Aipac has contributed to the absolute worst crimes humans can commit.
-35
Mamamama29010 3 days ago +18
And that has what to do with Jews living in other countries?
18
kraze_kalm 3 days ago -60
Are you willing to admit why the hate is growing around the world? There are actions being taken and what seems to be deep culture of hate in Israel right now.
-60
sulris 3 days ago +64
The country of Israel being a fascist genocidal regime is not an excuse for a rise in anti-semitism. (As your comment implies) In the same way that in the 1940’s Japan being a fascist genocidal regime didn’t excuse the U.S. interment camps of Japanese Americans. Two things can be wrong at the same time and one does not justify the other.
64
captars 3 days ago +45
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills having to see people be told this.
45
Mellowmyco 3 days ago +30
Especially when it’s ‘liberal’ Americans that need to be told. Cool, so we are all as evil as Trump by proxy, then? 🦗🦗
30
captars 3 days ago +23
No, but hatred is hatred. It doesn't matter what side of the aisle one's on. If someone use Israel excuse or justify antisemitism, then yeah. I see that person as a bigot. Just as I would with someone using 9/11 to excuse or justify Islamophobia. Criticize the Israeli government and its policies all you want—I'll join in right alongside you. But one can do that without being antisemitic, just as one would in calling out the CCP and the Chinese government without delving into anti-Chinese/anti-Asian racism.
23
Evo119 2 days ago -1
Apparently one cant bc every criticism of the Israeli government is called antisemitic.
-1
Evo119 2 days ago -1
Criticism of the government of Israel does not equal antisemitism. Stop acting like they are the same.
-1
[deleted] 3 days ago +1
[removed]
1
[deleted] 3 days ago -8
[removed]
-8
[deleted] 3 days ago +23
[removed]
23
[deleted] 3 days ago -13
[removed]
-13
[deleted] 3 days ago +11
[removed]
11
[deleted] 3 days ago +6
[removed]
6
[deleted] 3 days ago
[removed]
0
leaslethefalcon 3 days ago -2
Are you justifying Palestinians getting wiped off the map? Ffs it goes both ways man.
-2
[deleted] 3 days ago +5
[removed]
5
Shane-8300 3 days ago
Why are you crying about "anti semitism?
0
d3c0 3 days ago -9
Straight in with the disingenuous gotcha statements, no need for bad faith arguments
-9
RiimeHiime 3 days ago -37
Israel actively encourages antisemitism, it validates their argument that Israel must exist because it is the only safe place for Jews if they make it dangerous for Jews not living in Israel.
-37
Sumeriandawn 3 days ago +9
" Robert Bowers shot up a synagogue. The first we should do is discuss the actions of the Israeli government "
9
[deleted] 3 days ago +17
[removed]
17
leaslethefalcon 3 days ago -20
It’s literally Netanyahu and Gevir’s playbook. Nowhere in that comment are they blaming “all Jews”.
-20
randomwrencher 3 days ago +5
Well if the government's stopped going to war for Israel maybe that would help
5
Dallas131413 3 days ago -4
Saying f*** Israel is not anti semitism
-4
F0rScience 3 days ago +21
If you somehow missed it, this is a thread about someone lighting Jews on fire not someone criticizing Israel.
21
Dallas131413 3 days ago -7
the guy im commenting on is saying antisemitism is growing at a rapid rate, which means he is just crying that people side with palestine over israel : )
-7
F0rScience 3 days ago +13
Or maybe he is lamenting that attacks like the OP have increased massively over the past couple of years to the point we now rarely go more than a week or two without a violent incident against Jews or Jewish institutions in the diaspora.
13
Party_Ad_785 3 days ago -10
Especially if Israel keeps killing civilians indiscriminately. It is sad indeed that people associate the barberous acts of terrorism conducted by Israel with the whole if Judaism, which is a beautiful and peaceful religion that has been warped by Israel to be something disgusting and vile.
-10
olivepolive777 3 days ago -10
the zionosts disagree with what you said because they hate judaism and want it to be associated with atrocities 
-10
Cookie-Tiger 3 days ago +60
Finally some f****** justice
60
unnameableway 3 days ago +9
I didn’t know someone died in that attack. Sad. My hometown.
9
[deleted] 3 days ago +9
[removed]
9
Peripatetictyl 3 days ago +62
“He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Nietzsche
62
[deleted] 3 days ago -11
[removed]
-11
sulris 3 days ago +9
Some stuff is thought provoking. A lot is batshit and certainly a product of its times. It was embraced by the Nazis as part of their underlying philosophy… but that was not exactly intended by the author.
9
Peripatetictyl 3 days ago +6
Well said. To reiterate: read anything, and anyone, in the context of the situation and the times that they sprang from. Socrates->Plato->Aristotle-> are all fantastic, as well and equally are Spinoza->Kant->Schopenhauer->Nietzsche, as long as viewed in context. When individual quotes, or actions, of nearly anyone are used to dismiss the entirety of the total contribution, who could possibly survive such an examination? And, yes, read it- if you want. As with anything, when you experience good/bad/indifferent, there is still something to glean and grow from, even it it’s a new concept of word, they are all worth pursuing, until you decide they are not.
6
aedroogo 3 days ago
Yes I've been to the library and I understand the quote but monsters don't always give you the option of whether or not to fight them. The woman he burned to death certainly didn't have any options. He who doesn't fight monsters is leaving the monster fighting up to everyone else.
0
Peripatetictyl 3 days ago +2
I’d venture to say that you do *not* understand the quote.
2
sulris 3 days ago +32
Because societies that allow capital punishment legitimize violence as a response to perceived injustice leads to more instances of the people growing up in such a society resorting to violence and murder when they perceive themselves to have been slighted. Treating bad guys compassionately while removing them from society for the safety of society creates a societal paradigm that produces less bad guys.
32
ConsiderationOk4035 3 days ago -20
Counter argument: Japan has capital punishment.
-20
hatredpants2 3 days ago +17
That’s not a counter argument
17
DinnerMilk 3 days ago -34
Nah. I like the eye for an eye approach.
-34
TheLibDem 3 days ago +19
Why don’t you stop and think for a second about how that is not a good idea when people are wrongfully convicted all the time.
19
dblan9 3 days ago +9
> Why don’t you stop and think Aaaannnd you lost them.
9
Alexandria_Magna 3 days ago +5
Do you believe that the justice system is flawless? Do you believe that it is necessary for innocents to be killed by the state?
5
aedroogo 3 days ago -2
Deport him to the ocean.
-2
bonitaruth 3 days ago -5
Did his wife and children get deported?
-5
alexios_kk 2 days ago +4
They’re still being held by ICE
4
Snoo-85072 3 days ago -62
It's never going to make sense to me that the consequence for taking life is getting to live yours at the expense of the state.
-62
MaygarRodub 3 days ago +43
You make it sound like a reward; 'well, he doesn't have to pay bills anymore'. Prison is not a fun place. Execution is not a good answer. Maybe just have a think about it.
43
Snoo-85072 3 days ago -41
Yes. Life, being alive, is a reward if the alternative is death.
-41
IIlIIIlllIIIIIllIlll 3 days ago +17
Even when life is state sponsored slavery in one of the cruelest places on earth?
17
Snoo-85072 3 days ago -7
Read Viktor Frankl.
-7
IrNinjaBob 3 days ago +21
Yeah that’s a pretty dumb position to hold.
21
Snoo-85072 3 days ago +2
That life has more value than death? I'm not following your logic.
2
IrNinjaBob 3 days ago +16
That prison is a reward.
16
KulaanDoDinok 3 days ago +27
Life is not a reward. It is the default state of being.
27
[deleted] 3 days ago +5
[deleted]
5
Snoo-85072 3 days ago -1
This is going to sound callouse, but people kill themselves to avoid all kinds of things that they find unsavoury. It doesn't diminish the value of life.
-1
Kvaedi 3 days ago -24
Execution was a good answer for thousands of years. There’s no point at all in keeping a murderer alive. Life in prison is not a good answer.
-24
Frequent-Test-3012 3 days ago +10
How many innocent people are you ok with executing in order to keep the death penalty?
10
Evo119 2 days ago
Society has moved forward. What a pos.
0
softlytrampled 2 days ago
Did you know it’s significantly more expensive to execute someone? Life in prison costs us far less
0
Snoo-85072 2 days ago -4
...because the same system that provides life in prison as an option makes it ridiculously difficult to execute someone. If we just did the thing after the conviction, it would be much less.
-4
everydave42 2 days ago +3
Tell me you’re ok with wrongly convicted people being executed…
3
← Back to Board