· 127 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 1, 2026 at 4:09 AM

Marco Rubio explains the Goal in Iran Operation: eliminate any possibility of Iran gaining a nuclear weapon.

Posted by ConversationLow9545


US war on Iran 'last best chance' to avoid a nuclear Islamic regime, Marco Rubio says | The Jerusalem Post
The Jerusalem Post | JPost.com
US war on Iran 'last best chance' to avoid a nuclear Islamic regime, Marco Rubio says | The Jerusalem Post
Rubio said later on Tuesday that Washington could see the "finish line" in the Iran war, and added that there is potential for a "direct meeting at some point" between the two sides.

🚩 Report this post

127 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
deadswordrj Apr 1, 2026 +286
they will change goal by next week or let's be honest next day
286
kampi1989 Apr 1, 2026 +21
Getreu dem Motto "Der Weg ist das Ziel*
21
GenericUsername2056 Apr 1, 2026 +11
What if the goals are the friends they made along the way? 
11
IrishHambo Apr 1, 2026 +3
“Where we’re going, we don’t need no goals.”
3
BadmiralHarryKim Apr 1, 2026 +4
"~~Badges~~ Goals? We don't need no steenking ~~badges~~ goals."
4
whiznat Apr 1, 2026 +18
No, the goal always has been and will be distracting from the Epstein files. From Trump's POV, the plan is going bigly.
18
Christy427 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Mission success 6 months later: Iran will have nukes in two weeks
1
Beatrenger Apr 1, 2026 +1
That is the goal post that gets boots on the ground.
1
livinginahologram Apr 1, 2026 +1
>they will change goal by next week or let's be honest next day it's a mutating special military operation.
1
anti-fan6152 Apr 1, 2026 -41
Goals been the same dude yall just listens to your chosen news.
-41
wearebobNL Apr 1, 2026 +18
Not really. Trump has been inconsistent as hell. They keep switching between regime change, eliminating nuclear threat and just bombing the shit out of all military targets to weaken them. Before the war, they bombed iran's nuclear facilities, claiming they had completely obliterated iran's capability of producing nuclear weapons. That apparently wasn't as successful as claimed, likely because Iran moved the enriched uranium to another location. They started the war because Netanyahu saw an opportunity to kill Khamenei. And they told the people of Iran to take over after the US had finished bombing them. The regime change didnt happen and Iran's asymmetric response escalated war into a global energy crisis by closing the Strait of Hormuz. Whatever the plan was, it doesn't seem to be working. That said, they have given the Iranian regime every reason to double up on their ambitions to create a nuclear weapons as they are now under an existential threat. That's probably why the US are now back at plan A. Afaik that's no easy feat as the Iranian regime has moved the uranium underground. It requires boots on the ground, which will inevitably lead to many casualties on both sides.
18
vonGlick Apr 1, 2026 +10
You're right. Last time they attacked Iran goal was to to stop nuclear program. And they won that one too. Was it 6 months ago? Aren't you tired of winning yet?
10
anti-fan6152 Apr 1, 2026 -1
Incoherent nonsense.
-1
vonGlick Apr 1, 2026 +1
Lol. That's why you blocked me?
1
this_dust Apr 1, 2026 +12
The goal is whatever Bibi says it is, until it isn’t. He just hasn’t told Trump yet.
12
Zenshinn Apr 1, 2026 +114
Didn't we bomb their nuclear facilities last year? Didn't Tulsi Gabbard say "As a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated"?
114
asetniop Apr 1, 2026 +101
Somehow, Iran's nuclear enrichment program returned...
101
SoulBonfire Apr 1, 2026 +13
They obliterated the doorway only, it seems. Operation midnight doorknock.
13
Internal_Necro47 Apr 1, 2026 +2
Russia notified Iran days before the bombing that we were going to bomb their bunker it was somewhat general knowledge at the time that they had prepared the bunker for the strike.
2
Glass_Librarian9019 Apr 1, 2026 +38
[https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2025/06/irans-nuclear-facilities-have-been-obliterated-and-suggestions-otherwise-are-fake-news/](https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2025/06/irans-nuclear-facilities-have-been-obliterated-and-suggestions-otherwise-are-fake-news/) Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Have Been Obliterated — and Suggestions Otherwise are Fake News The White House June 25, 2025
38
GuelphEastEndGhetto Apr 1, 2026 +1
Was that a double fake then?
1
ryapeter Apr 1, 2026 -2
That was june last year?
-2
KingSystem Apr 1, 2026 +103
Thank god we’re finally stopping them from getting a nuke they’ve been one day away from getting for 30 years
103
PrometheanSwing Apr 1, 2026 +4
To be fair, that’s kinda true. Their strategy has been to be close to acquiring them without actually acquiring them, and have to deal with that that entails. They can act innocent since they technically don’t have nukes, but if they felt so inclined they could build some in a short period of time.
4
vonGlick Apr 1, 2026 +37
To be fair before Trump backed off from the agreement they were cooperating. edit: missed the word 'from'
37
PrometheanSwing Apr 1, 2026 +9
This is true.
9
FBI_Rapid_Response Apr 1, 2026 -6
On the nuclear aspect sure. But let’s not kid ourselves, they drastically ramped up R&D into delivery mechanisms (ballistic missiles) while waiting for the nuclear deal to expire. So yes it’s technically correct they weren’t developing nuclear warheads , they _were_ continuing to advance their nuclear capabilities. Nuclear weapons are nothing without a way to deliver it. Think of it as a progress tree with the end goal as a nuclear weapon capable of hitting targets. Just because you are temporarily paused the nuclear payload, doesn’t mean you need to stop the payload delivery system.
-6
vonGlick Apr 1, 2026 +7
I am not a fan of Iranian regime, so please do not take it as their defense. I agree they should not have nukes, and it would just be bit easier if they were not constantly being bombed by Israel or US and not surrounded by hostile countries like Saudi Arabia.
7
Active_Confection655 Apr 1, 2026 -4
And they still had Enriched Uranium. They probably do have the capabilities as Russia is giving them information. Boy would Russia and China love to see the US get sucked into this for a long time and losing strength.
-4
HarveysBackupAccount Apr 1, 2026 +3
The flip side - how can we realistically stop a country from EVER getting a nuke? (even we define "ever" as only the next 50 years) You have to straight up conquer and subjugate them, or routinely bomb any progress they make, right?
3
Borazon Apr 1, 2026 +5
It would still be extremely risky. No country has ever made a bomb without also doing testing of both the bombs and the delivery system. Any testing program would still takes many months if not years. There is still quite a big time gap between being nuclear capable and having functional nuclear weapons.
5
KriosXVII Apr 1, 2026 +5
If you haven't been paying attention to all the Iranian ballistic missiles hitting around the Gulf and Israel, Iran sure has credible delivery systems.
5
Borazon Apr 1, 2026 +1
I know, but fitting one with an nuclear payload, and firing and expecting to work on the first go are different things. Especially if it would be used in a first strike. Especially against a fully nuclear capable country like Israel that will retaliate even no matter what. You kind of would like to be sure that you don't have misfire.... North Korea has been testing for the at least 10 years with tests from 2006 till 2017. The USA also does continuous testing of its nuclear weapon delivery systems, like last week [https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/b-52-spotted-yet-again-testing-the-agm-181-next-gen-stealth-nuclear-cruise-missile/ar-AA1Z8afN](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/b-52-spotted-yet-again-testing-the-agm-181-next-gen-stealth-nuclear-cruise-missile/ar-AA1Z8afN) Point is that the '2 weeks away from nuclear weapons' has been a myth. Always has been. At best they have had materials for dirty bombs. Which they probs still do.
1
Pleiadez Apr 1, 2026 +1
To be fair they had a fatwa (religious law) against building a nuke.  Doing what the us did is the biggest incentive to do aquire a nuke.
1
toggiz_the_elder Apr 1, 2026 -1
And yet they never have. Interesting.
-1
Polyanalyne Apr 1, 2026 +58
So the goal was met before the war even started?
58
SolarBum Apr 1, 2026 +28
According to Trump the goal was met [last June](https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2025/06/irans-nuclear-facilities-have-been-obliterated-and-suggestions-otherwise-are-fake-news/).
28
Pleiadez Apr 1, 2026 +1
Only Trump can win this much.
1
rtygf Apr 1, 2026 +11
They had a solid deal that Obama signed but your toxic egotistical vainglorious incompetent corrupt greedy evil nasty child molester lying pond slime of a boss decided that it wasn't good enough so here we are billions of dollars many dead people including school kids killed by your recklessness, back at square one. Please just go.
11
qdcah Apr 1, 2026 +124
Mission Failed: Reason: You bombed Iran twice unprovoked during negotiations. Result: USA can't be trusted. Your word means nothing. All countries that don't want to get invaded by the Epstein Regime will end up developing nukes.
124
sET____ Apr 1, 2026 +34
Living through a collapse of a superpower wasn't something I expected to see, but here we are. I wonder how or if any parallels to the Roman Empire will happen. I suspect it will be far faster. 
34
Mjolnir2000 Apr 1, 2026 +44
I'd imagine it'll be closer to the Soviet Union. The American economy will collapse, and oligarchs will buy up all the infrastructure for pennies on the dollar and happily rule over the authoritarian state that remains.
44
Vio_ Apr 1, 2026 +8
They already are. I recommend everyone read Red Notice by Bill Browder. He did exactly that as an American-British hedge manager who was part of that initial infrastructure buy out process, but still got royally screwed over by Putin.
8
[deleted] Apr 1, 2026 -2
[deleted]
-2
boejouma Apr 1, 2026 -1
Bruh. The robust optimistic take is liked, even welcomed.... but yo.... Come to the moment and greet it with the seething disdain required because aren't excluded because of governor. Said as an American, Iowan, and mostly as an ally against any king/authoritarian.
-1
The9isback Apr 1, 2026 +2
The size of the military, the population, and the economy means that it won't be that fast. Not to mention the nuclear weapons. Put it this way, if it is rapid then the nuclear weapons are involved and we are all dead.
2
EmbarrassedW33B Apr 1, 2026 +3
It won't "collapse" per se unless Trump does something utterly insane like drop a few nukes (really not impossible...) It will just continue to unravel slowly, faster than ever now, because of what Trump and his goons have set in motion. In another decade America will probably still exist, probably still be powerful and rich, but with massively reduced global influence, far fewer true alliances, and far fewer tools to pull itself out of its slow death spiral. Thats pretty much how Rome fell too, not with a bang but with a decades long, grinding, miserable reduction. 
3
KenUsimi Apr 1, 2026 +2
That’s the good option at this rate. We’ve been getting more and more polarized; more and more people pull away and clash together. Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold.
2
Active_Confection655 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Lack of intelligence is a severe problem.
1
Time-Weekend-8611 Apr 1, 2026 +1
So like the British Empire then.
1
NosillaWilla Apr 1, 2026 +2
Whats gonna happen next for america? Anyone gonna save us or do we become an oppressive oligarchy?
2
Zenshinn Apr 1, 2026 +13
Number 2.
13
SP1570 Apr 1, 2026 +6
The shit option
6
DetectiveAmes Apr 1, 2026 -1
I think our best shot of the American empire falling, would be other countries sanctioning it to hell and back. I highly doubt that’s possible, unfortunately, but there’s certainly enough of a catalyst that it could happen. Maybe even to an extent. We’ve seen some countries declining America’s requests for using their airspace, military bases, so maybe we could see bigger things someday soon.
-1
Nyaos Apr 1, 2026 +15
Right? If the goal was to somehow convince the Iranians to not get a nuke, we’ve done the exact opposite by proving that the only thing that can ensure their sovereignty is a nuclear weapon. Notice that despite how antagonistic and belligerent North Korea is, nobody ever bothered them after they developed nuclear weapons. We talked about invading North Korea for decades until that moment, then it all disappeared.
15
BoringEntropist Apr 1, 2026 +7
Exactly. And then you look at countries that didn't finish their nuke programs (Syria, Iraq, Libya) and those who gave up their stockpile (Ukraine), and see what happened to them. The whole non-proliferation regime has been undermined by larger powers for decades, and now they are wondering why middle powers begin to rethink their nuclear strategy. I expect countries like Japan, South Korea and Poland will violate the NPT treaty by the end of decade.
7
stopsayingtobefairok Apr 1, 2026 +10
Best I can do is a massive increase in nuclear proliferation.
10
Maeglin75 Apr 1, 2026 +8
That goal can't be archived with bombing. There are only two alternatives. 1. Invade Iran with a large amount of ground forces, wipe out all remains of the current regime, install a puppet government friendly to the US and stabilise it with large occupation forces for decades. (This can still fail like it did in Afghanistan.) 2. An international treaty that is monitored by neutral authorities. Like the one that existed but Trump broke it because it was negotiated by Obama. Now Iran would likely never trust the US to honour a treaty ever again.
8
welshwelsh Apr 1, 2026
1 is the only acceptable outcome in my opinion. We need to do whatever is needed to bring back the Shah. An agreement isn't worth much. Iran can agree to stop developing nuclear weapons, but they will still have their 60% enriched uranium and control over the Strait of Hormuz to use as bargaining chips in the future. We can't let them have that type of power.
0
scarab1001 Apr 1, 2026 +6
Brilliant strategy. 1. Start war 2. Cause global recession 3. declare war won 4. Backdate war aims 5. leave
6
ArterialRed Apr 1, 2026 +6
That's at least the 9th claimed goal of this illegal war. Though in reality now the only goal still active is to disengage in a way Trump's propagandists can handle (without having people return to talking about the Epstein/Trump files).
6
Effervescentgravy Apr 1, 2026 +19
They haven’t had a nuclear weapons program for more than 20 years and ayatollah khamenei wrote a fatwa that said nuclear weapons were haram. But the US pulled out of one nuke deal, bombed them during two different diplomatic talks and killed the anti-nuke ayatollah. It would be insane for Iran to not develop nuclear weapons now. Their choice is to either be North Korea or Libya. And multiple Israeli and US officials have described their current course of action as the “Libya option”.
19
king-of-boom Apr 1, 2026 +10
>They haven’t had a nuclear weapons program for more than 20 years Then why were they enriching uranium to 60%? You can disagree with the invasion while still being honest with yourself about what Iran was up to.
10
Hoosagoodboy Apr 1, 2026 +11
At this point, logically speaking...Iran has every right to develop nukes, seeing that treaties aren't worth shit f*** all considering U.S and Israeli actions as of late.
11
Effervescentgravy Apr 1, 2026 +7
As a bargaining chip. They did the same thing in the lead up to the JCPOA and then they gave up that enriched uranium to be processed into fuel rods by another country (I think it was France) as part of the agreement. According to Tulsi Gabbard and Ted Cruz there is no evidence that Iran has been trying to develop a nuclear weapon.
7
BoringEntropist Apr 1, 2026 -2
The enrichment to 60% was a hedging strategy. Partially to gain a bargaining chip for diplomatic negotiations, partially to have a fallback option in the case if they decide to actually build a weapon. 
-2
Mindless-Peak-1687 Apr 1, 2026 +3
He can't guarantee anything.
3
Catch_022 Apr 1, 2026 +3
They are going to paratroop drop on the mountain where they think the materials are stored. Insane
3
Boys4Ever Apr 1, 2026 +3
Admitting the bombing runs last year failed must hurt or later admitting this excuse failed might hurt more although the base will accept it was all Biden's fault. Why we will fail.
3
larryfromhope Apr 1, 2026 +3
The goal is to distract from Epstein.
3
Fritzkreig Apr 1, 2026 +7
Is not Lil Mario focused on banging his head against Cubas these days?
7
whiskeyriver0987 Apr 1, 2026 +3
"Eliminate any possibility of Iran gaining a nuclear weapon" isn't a military objective. As long as some state that calls itself Iran could exist, there is a possible future where they gain a nuclear weapon. Frankly given how belligerent the US is to the current state of Iran, I suggest they have only succeeded in strengthening any ambitions Iran has at developing nuclear weapons and stockpiling them so the US will leave them the f*** alone. Nuclear weapons are expensive to produce and maintain. By stockpiling enough enriched uranium to quickly develope a simple fission bomb Iran could use the possibility of quickly becoming a nuclear power as a deterant without incurring the costs of actually having nuclear weapons. That's why they've been "X number of months away from a nuclear weapon" for decades.
3
minisoo Apr 1, 2026 +7
Enriched uranium still remains in Iran. Iran is pissed now and can initiate its nuclear weapon program with a lot more self defense justification than ever before. This proves to the world's middle powers that if you don't want US to kidnap and assassinate your leaders, or destroy your infrastructure at whims, you will need to have your own nuclear weapon program so that they will think twice before touching you. A nuclear arms race amongst the middle powers will arise.
7
SamuelYosemite Apr 1, 2026 +2
Rubio is a dummy and a puppet
2
jideru Apr 1, 2026 +2
Whatever my demented daddy says
2
DisasterNo1740 Apr 1, 2026 +2
But they can’t achieve this without full scale ground invasion and regime change. So this goal is not going to be met.
2
Gutterfoolishness Apr 1, 2026 +2
Its OK, by tomorrow they'll have a new goal to not achieve.
2
ThePlasticSturgeons Apr 1, 2026 +2
If only someone else had thought of that, came up with a plan that the entire World agreed on, and implemented it successfully.
2
Fuddamatic Apr 1, 2026 +2
Great. If only a president could get a negotiated agreement. One that is signed and verifiable. Only a fool would turn down something like that, and opt for a never ended war instead.
2
LifeOfHi Apr 1, 2026 +2
“Ugh, I give up! Have Marco explain it to them!”
2
Turbulent-Warthog449 Apr 1, 2026 +2
Let’s be honest your goal should be not to screw up the economy more than you already have
2
9ersaur Apr 1, 2026 +3
Mission objectives are to continually invent plausible mission objectives
3
drammer Apr 1, 2026 +3
I was way off, I thought it was oil.
3
Accomplished_Pea6334 Apr 1, 2026 +5
"Listen and do anything Israel says".
5
Haunting_Reflections Apr 1, 2026 +3
Iran will now stop at absolutely f****** nothing to get nukes now. In fact any country that values its independence is going to look at China, America, and Russia, and start speed-running nukes.
3
Material_Policy6327 Apr 1, 2026 +4
Which they most likely never had to begin with
4
FreeKony2016 Apr 1, 2026 +14
and which they agreed not to have under the treaty the US withdrew from
14
JeffSergeant Apr 1, 2026
That was Obamapeace, totally unacceptable.
0
Chrono_Convoy Apr 1, 2026 +2
What was that thing with Bush about WMD’s?
2
SituationIll5763 Apr 1, 2026 +2
There’s only really one way to ensure this
2
PepperMill_NA Apr 1, 2026 +1
Good to know that Rubio thinks Obama got it right. Treaty with inspections was working until Trump threw it out. Bunch of children leading the US right now.
1
TheTightestChungus Apr 1, 2026 +1
Ok, we leave...I wonder what the absolute first thing Iran is going to do, no matter the cost or international fallout, as soon as they possibly can? Become a nuclear state. It's their only defense at this point. They can't trust the US to negotiate a deal they will uphold, let alone not get bombed midst negotiation. This was just a pants shittingly insane/stupid move by this administration. I fear the end game here is limited nuclear weapon usage to "save face". Who is telling Trump "that's an insanely stupid idea" at this point? His entire cabinet thinks Armageddon is going to be where they all get raptured to live with Jesus, and all the Liberals, guys, and brown people get punished. It's actually terrifying, because these people are unhinged religious zealots. There is no negotiation or actual long term goal here. Not to mention Israel LITERALLY being a Rogue nuclear state, while using this administration to run another Crusade level extermination of Arabs. It's all bad, and I don't feel like people understand HOW bad. The genie is out of the bottle. The toothpaste is out of the tube. The barn door is open and the horses are gone. WW3 is on the cusp of kicking off.
1
king-of-boom Apr 1, 2026 +5
>I fear the end game here is limited nuclear weapon usage to "save face". I think the only point in history where a Limited nuclear weapon usage was realistic was 1945. Any use of nuclear weapons in this day would be met with increasing escalatory use of nuclear weapons until the Northern Hemisphere is glowing.
5
JeffSergeant Apr 1, 2026 +2
Who's going to Nuke the US for nuking Tehran? The US administration could do so with impunity if they were crazy enough.
2
king-of-boom Apr 1, 2026 +2
No one immediately, but it would probably open the door to Russia nuking Ukraine, which is just another step towards total war.
2
Rock-Ski-Golf-Repeat Apr 1, 2026 +1
So no regime change? Or harming civilians? I'm so confused.
1
Hoosagoodboy Apr 1, 2026 +1
Iran was 2 weeks from a nuke for 20 years now, how many ways do you f****** beat a dead horse.
1
mrmikehunt51 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Sounds familiar
1
Spinoza42 Apr 1, 2026 +1
How though? If North Korea could do it, while having none of the strategic advantages Iran has, and you apparently don't care for a negotiated settlement... *how* are you going to prevent this? Permanent occupation? A new bombing campaign every year? Fragmenting the country so strictly speaking Iran doesn't exist so whichever successor states obtain nuclear weapons at least aren't called "Iran"?
1
runninglaps Apr 1, 2026 +1
That's not going to ever change
1
thisfknguy Apr 1, 2026 +1
So where do we go from here with the Epstien-Nukes?
1
Internal_Necro47 Apr 1, 2026 +1
To do that you'd have to eliminate Russia.
1
dimwalker Apr 1, 2026 +1
How can he make sure they can't buy it from russians?
1
Aggressive_Nature708 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Goalposts change every hour
1
TheCulturalBomb Apr 1, 2026 +1
If nuclear weapons were the issue then why does North Korea have them? Despite knowing they were developing them
1
CassiusCreed Apr 1, 2026 +1
I thought they did that when they decimated them last time. Guess they had shovels.
1
rp2784 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Yeah that’s it. ‘Newclear’ weapons. “Yeah! That’s the ticket!”
1
Sensitive-Report-787 Apr 1, 2026 +1
that’s an impossible goal to achieve with a limited war
1
tombatron Apr 1, 2026 +1
OK, that’s a tangible goal. I’d like to know how any of this moves us closer to that goal. US diplomacy can’t be trusted as we’ve demonstrated twice in the last year. Security guarantees aren’t worth a warm bucket of piss as demonstrated by the US’s inability to defend anyone in the region. Military actions against the regime have thus far resulted in massive damage to the USs allies. So… what? Are they planning on glassing the entire country?
1
KriosXVII Apr 1, 2026 +1
Y'all gonna bomb Iran every 6 months forever then?
1
VegetableYesterday63 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Thought Trump said we obliterated their nuclear operation last summer?
1
TheFillth Apr 1, 2026 +1
They are doing the opposite while showing the rest of the world that you need nukes not to be the next target
1
cycleprof Apr 1, 2026 +1
I don't see that is even remotely possible without a permanent presence on the ground.
1
hoodlumonprowl Apr 1, 2026 +1
...for now. Eliminating the possibility for now, lil Marco. Get Donnie's balls out of your mouth and say something useful you little prick.
1
Tsquare43 Apr 1, 2026 +1
So, did they lie last year when they "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program, or are they lying now?
1
Gareth009 Apr 1, 2026 +1
How does his wife stomach being married to the neutered spineless little insect?
1
Bigchunky_Boy Apr 1, 2026 +1
How many non combatants have been killed so far ? They bragged about accuracy of their bombs how about some stats ?
1
Pusfilledonut Apr 1, 2026 +1
I thought it was to distract from the pdf files, and all the blackmail Benny Nutanyahoo and Putski have on Orange Caesar.
1
Ihateporn2020 Apr 1, 2026 +1
they don't have a goal.
1
Leverkaas2516 Apr 1, 2026 +1
The irony is that if nothing else, operation Epic Fail will virtually guarantee that some of the enriched uranium that Iran has already made will find its way to the hands of terrorists. If they can't make a fission bomb, they'll use it to make some downtown area somewhere uninhabitable.
1
BoringEntropist Apr 1, 2026 +3
I doubt that. The effectiveness of dirty bombs depends in the radioactivity of the materials used. And uranium (even when highly enriched) is a rather weak alpha emitter. The damage of such a weapon would be more psychological rather than physical. And in contrast to a nuclear explosion, where neutron radiation turn environmental materials into radioactive fallout, the contamination produced by dirty bombs is far easier to clean up.
3
Sweatytubesock Apr 1, 2026 +1
Sure, lil’ Marco.
1
ChanceryTheRapper Apr 1, 2026 +1
Which they said they already did back in January and insisted it was "fake news" to say otherwise.
1
ApplePieAdviser Apr 1, 2026 +1
Man I wish we could just like make a deal with them to not make Nukes. Oh wait…
1
Maleficent-Elk-3298 Apr 1, 2026 +1
I thought that did that last year. They said they did anyway.
1
Otherwise-Sun2486 Apr 1, 2026 +1
Did you forget back last summer several bunker destroying bombs were dropped n did just that according to Trump he ended the war before he started it
1
SillyGoatGruff Apr 1, 2026 -1
Maybe the real goal in iran is the friends we ~~made~~ lost along the way?
-1
← Back to Board