Meta creating AI version of Mark Zuckerberg so staff can talk to the boss

They are replacing him with something that can pass the Turing test.

Finally meta employees can say "he's just a human, like us!" about their boss

Imagine if everyone just decided that AI Zuck is the real Zuck because it feels more human than the IRL version.

Make sure it likes Sweet Baby rays though

Zuck was the robot. Now its a turing test for us to realize this “ai” is actually biologic based. Olsson 1995 - fungi communicate Babikov 2013 - biologic computers based on amino acids Edit:spacing

That shouldn't be hard. All AI models I've tried have more humanity than him already

They could save billions by just buying a couple mannequins with tape recorders playing non-sense

At the end of the day, those at the top have failed to recognize that they are actually the easiest to replace with AI. On the plus side, when the AI take over, hopefully things will get better cause they won't be ego tripping assholes.

Unless the bot stages a coup and acquires Zuck's Class B shares, sadly not.

Maybe he's a precursor to the Horatio - [https://endlessspace.fandom.com/wiki/Horatio](https://endlessspace.fandom.com/wiki/Horatio)

This is entirely in keeping with Zuck's ego: "My people need to see more of me. But I don't have the time to cater for their petty demands."

the crazy part is that the ai will probably seem more human than the original

"_Here's my suggestion box_" (Points to the wastepaper basket.)

Well that wouldn't even be his idea. The cryptobros thought of it first - [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralized\_autonomous\_organization](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralized_autonomous_organization)

My first thought. Second: who on earth in that company will want to talk to him AI or irl?

I suspect that part of the motivation - perhaps the biggest reason - is to add plausible deniability to any blatantly illegal instructions Zuckerberg gives. We already live in a world where it's hard to punish CEOs because they know to give those instructions verbally and have their subordinates start the paper trail for them so that there's a fall guy if and when the organization is caught doing something illegal. It may very well be possible, in the near future, for Zuckerberg to tell subordinates to do something blatantly unethical or illegal (such as directly impersonating people on Facebook to interact with their family members as a form of advertising) and then, when questioned, simply say, "It was the AI, not me; I can't be punished for something I didn't do, and the AI can't be punished because it isn't a human." No need to take the risk of someone spilling the beans on it anymore; as long as it's done over a video call or through an email, he can always claim the AI did it, and due to the burden of proof resting on the accuser/prosecution, it could be very nearly impossible to prove any personal culpability for anything - especially if there are no meaningful logs of the AI's activities. And given how poorly the regulatory environment in most of the world is keeping up with the rapid progress of AI technology (often not even trying, or in the case of the USA, actively trying to prohibit regulation before it can even start), plus our reluctance to ever meaningfully punish the organization itself beyond a fine that's trivial to them, it will probably work.

Seriously. Will the AI be making all the decisions in the future, or what is the purpose of talking to it in the first place?

Think Xfinity Customer Service but for HR

I expect someone will be compiling a log that will go into another AI model that determines who gets fired next.

That’s the thing. He’s allowed to dot his and keep his job, but he’s fire anyone who attempted this. 

Grigor IInd irl - [https://empireearth.fandom.com/wiki/Grigor\_II](https://empireearth.fandom.com/wiki/Grigor_II) :D

Like Hari Seldon, only he's not telling you anything useful.

Can't wait for Meta-Zuck to sign-off on new projects without Meat-Zuck knowing about it.

He still zucks though