For nothing else than to coerce the people into pursuing a political goal.
They were victims of textbook terrorism.
22
phosdickMar 24, 2026
+66
Good to see that there are still states that think that cold-blooded murder needs to be called out, even when conducted by Federal Goon Squads.
66
AnointMyPhallusMar 25, 2026
+2
I mean, no charges have been filed in the murders of Good and Pretti so I think you're giving far too much credit.
2
phosdickMar 25, 2026
+1
Would you rather have officials who won't call out cold blooded murderers? I think Minnesota definitely deserves lots of credit, here - they're actively going after a release of the evidence being hidden by Trump & Goons, Inc. - so yes... I'll give credit where credit is due.
1
Wonder-MachineMar 24, 2026
+16
Honestly suing them and tying them up in litigation might be the only thing we can really do that’ll matter
16
IrrelevantLeprechaunMar 24, 2026
+12
USA is the single most litigious country on earth. We may as well use it to our advantage.
12
ButtSpelunker420Mar 25, 2026
+3
They should arrest the m***********.
3
Unfair_Web_8275Mar 24, 2026
+28
It hadn't done this already?
I was wondering if their families had sued the DHS for labeling them as "terrorists".
28
Dresden_1174Mar 24, 2026
+29
If I remember correctly, state investigators were being held back from a proper investigation by the feds. Probably took them this long to get enough evidence together that hadn’t been tampered with
29
coonwhizMar 24, 2026
+25
Nope, this lawsuit is to get access to the evidence:
>Minnesota officials sued the Trump administration on Tuesday for access to evidence they say they need to independently investigate three shootings by federal officers, including the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti.
25
Unfair_Web_8275Mar 24, 2026
+5
Thank you for that information.
5
Smile_Like_ArsenicMar 24, 2026
+10
The legal basis for this suit likely rests on the Tenth Amendment and the failure of federal agencies to coordinate with state law enforcement, leading to the jurisdictional chaos that resulted in these shootings. By naming specific victims like Pretti and Good, Minnesota is moving beyond abstract policy debates and forcing the discovery process to reveal internal communications from the executive branch. This could set a massive precedent for state autonomy during federal interventions....
10
funtimes-forallMar 24, 2026
+5
May we always remember their names, their murderers will probably go to their graves unpunished.
5
Resident-Writing850Mar 24, 2026
+4
Good. May their families get justice for their murders.
4
ButtSpelunker420Mar 25, 2026
+2
Why are we _suing_ and not _arresting_?
2
CrotasScrota84Mar 25, 2026
+2
Discovery should be interesting
2
winnie_the_slayerMar 24, 2026
-3
sues? is that all they're gonna do?
-3
whichwitch9Mar 24, 2026
+17
The feds are blocking their investigations. It's making it harder to bring charges against the ICE agents involved. That's part of why the lawsuit needs to come first- they're suing for the evidence
17
davidwhatshisname52Mar 24, 2026
+13
it is very likely an intelligent long-play, for if negligence is found under the civil liability's less stringent standard of proof, then criminal charges can be brought and possibly more easily won under Minnesota's second-degree manslaughter statute
13
Equivalent-Excuse-80Mar 24, 2026
+10
I’m genuinely curious what you believe the headline to mean. Do you think the verb “sues” is implying some financial remuneration?
The state is suing the Feds for access to evidence of the crime scenes. “Suing” is seeking court remediation and order to the Feds to give the evidence to the state so they can *pursue its own investigation*.
10
IrrelevantLeprechaunMar 24, 2026
+4
That's how most law enforcement works in the US at this point. Someone breaks a law, the law isn't enforced, and the accused has to get sued to be held accountable.
22 Comments