· 147 comments · Save ·
Questions & Help Mar 14, 2026 at 4:41 AM

Missile strikes helipad in US embassy compound in Iraq, AP reports

Posted by SpencerAXbot


https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/missile-strikes-helipad-us-embassy-compound-iraq-ap-reports-2026-03-14/

🚩 Report this post

147 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Notwerk Mar 14, 2026 +1825
Time for Benghazi-style, never-ending investigations and hearings. Dial it up. Let's go.
1825
VladtheInhaler999 Mar 14, 2026 +505
Could you imagine Trump testifying in one place for 11 hours?
505
StopReadingThis-Now Mar 14, 2026 +165
Will he get poop breaks?
165
The_Pelican1245 Mar 14, 2026 +180
He doesn’t need them. He just dukes in his diaper when he wants.
180
Nissan-S-Cargo Mar 14, 2026 +54
That’s how you know he really cares about the job. Most presidents wouldn’t shit their pants. Finally, we’ve got someone taking the office seriously! Full diapers == full commitment to the American people. Do you think Xi is shitting his pants on the regular? I don’t.
54
kafktastic Mar 14, 2026 +15
It’s called power shitting
15
zatalak Mar 14, 2026 +9
Shart of the deal
9
VladtheInhaler999 Mar 14, 2026 +15
That scent would clear the room quick.
15
spikyraccoon Mar 14, 2026 +17
Kinda like this: https://youtube.com/shorts/gAebGXCAwoA?si=5ceWYQxIh9R1ZnVV
17
Trkaline Mar 14, 2026 +5
Like a real man should. Bathroom breaks are for low energy losers.
5
Coherent_Tangent Mar 14, 2026 +1
He will require some nap breaks though.
1
MildlyAgitatedBovine Mar 14, 2026 +2
In Soviet Amerika, toilet comes to you!
2
SimmeringPawsOfNirn Mar 14, 2026 +2
no, everyone else gets vicks menthol goo to put under their nostrils.
2
SAugsburger Mar 14, 2026 +76
"Are you awake President Trump?"
76
SupaKoopa714 Mar 14, 2026 +21
Going off his Truth Social rampages, I bet if you gave him a rail of Adderall while he was sundowning he'd probably be able to go for 4 or 5 hours at least.
21
zamboni-jones Mar 14, 2026 +2
Just as long Stephen Wormtongue is whispering sweet nothings into his ear.
2
ScipioAfricanusMAJ Mar 14, 2026 +8
Y’all think if the next president offered Hillary Clinton to be the Attorney General she would accept?
8
donnerpartytaconight Mar 14, 2026 +6
Man, I was gonna say we don't need empty vindictive appointments but then I remembered she was a lawyer who actually worked on the Watergate impeachment trial and now I have a new wish.
6
fruitmongerking Mar 14, 2026 +5
Honestly, I’d rather Jack Smith if he’s eligible. Though Hillary would not be a bad choice by any stretch if she wanted it.
5
dropbearinbound Mar 14, 2026 +3
Sir you haven't given a coherent answer to a single question
3
MacBeef Mar 14, 2026 +1
Oof, the smell.
1
sandboxmatt Mar 14, 2026 +1
Whatever finishes the job i guess
1
FlemPlays Mar 14, 2026 +1
Can he even make the first hour without passing out?
1
Kaffe-Mumriken Mar 14, 2026 +1
Try 5 minutes
1
BreesusTakeTheWheel Mar 14, 2026 +37
That’s only for democrats. Republicans just get strongly worded letters.
37
GovernorHarryLogan Mar 14, 2026 +72
Can we get a side of Epstein files in these hearings?
72
Krillin113 Mar 14, 2026 +9
They should drag them in for this, and then throw questions at them about Epstein, or the ballroom. Do what they did to bill and tried to do to Hillary, catch them on a different scandal than the one they were dragged in for
9
WaffleHouseGladiator Mar 14, 2026 +25
It'll happen.  Eventually.  Long after the damage is done.
25
CallRespiratory Mar 14, 2026 +5
"Get Biden on the stand for making Trump do this!" /S but not really cause they're gonna blame one or more of Biden/Obama/Clinton
5
hylo23 Mar 14, 2026 +7
I personally never want to hear the end of this. Endless. Every single email and message.
7
Bathsaltslumberjack Mar 14, 2026 +2
Rip VileRat
2
bushesbushesbushes Mar 14, 2026 +1
What a weird time.
1
InevitableSwan7 Mar 14, 2026 +1
[ Removed by Reddit ]
1
CapitanianExtinction Mar 14, 2026 +645
Destroyed all military targets in Iran eh?  Trump's got some 'splaing to do 
645
BreakfastAntelope Mar 14, 2026 +145
Are you using your freedom of speech to question this "Holy war"? Arrest them!
145
Memory_Leak_ Mar 14, 2026 +9
We still have freedom of speech?
9
SlumdogSkillionaire Mar 19, 2026 +1
You're free to utter as much speech as you want from the pre-approved list.
1
Morgannin09 Mar 14, 2026 +19
Dude can't explain what he had for breakfast without lying about it
19
KGB_cutony Mar 14, 2026 +6
based on what they said about nuclear capabilities, I'm inclined to believe Iran has completely rebuilt their military capabilities in the past 3 days. If they could truly rebuild nuclear capabilities in 6 months and drone infrastructure in 3 days, maybe Iran IS a credible threat.
6
padizzledonk Mar 14, 2026 +1
He is doing his usual huckster "Everything is awesome!" Bit until things magically work out or people forget like hes done his entire life and it aint gonna work this time because things will not magically work out and people wont forget an ongping war
1
D2dj Mar 14, 2026 +470
I think it got under emphasized that for the first week-ish Iran was targetting radar dishes and had some success taking them out. Without those it's harder to track and destroy incoming missiles so, yes, Iran has fewer missiles now and fewer launchers for them but it can be more efficient with the remaining. And the supplies of counters is fewer as well. I saw reporting from one of the Arab states that said instead of only about 10% of drones making it through their defenses at the start of the war, about 25% were making it through. That's not great
470
Hay_Fever_at_3_AM Mar 14, 2026 +310
It's basically what they burned a majority of their static launchers and stockpile on during the first days. And this was actually war gamed by them, they planned for exactly this scenario years ago; focus on burning out the sensors and then the trickle from mobile launchers and buried factories can effectively keep hitting targets indefinitely. Not even some sort of secret, either. How the hell is the US so underprepared?
310
CliftonForce Mar 14, 2026 +180
The Pentagon knew they were not ready. They said repeatedly that this was a stupid idea. The Administration did not care.
180
brimston3- Mar 14, 2026 +92
Chairman of the joint chiefs, General Dan Caine, told the news the week before they started the attack that it was a bad time to attack Iran.
92
Lirael_Gold Mar 14, 2026 +46
That's his job, the Joint Chiefs are *supposedly* a translation layer between the President and the US military. That said, the military is still subordinate to the president and doesn't seem particularly willing to kick up too much of a fuss if Trump gives them terrible orders.
46
CouldBeLessDepressed Mar 14, 2026 +6
The military shouldn't be subordinate to Trump. The only direct control the office of the president has is over the Marines. Everything else is supposed to be at the direction of congress. Trump having control over the entire military right now is not supposed to be a thing. Like at all. And the fact that it basically is after he installed all his yes-men and fired everyone with any amount of loyalty to the constitution should have had every one of our allies preparing for an all out world war. And sure, there's the patriot-act and whatnot, but they're really stretching here. If the rest of the world had even the slightest sense of self preservation, they'd be uniting to severely condemn and punish the USA right now.
6
Lirael_Gold Mar 14, 2026 +8
>Everything else is supposed to be at the direction of congress. I agree with the rest of your point, but [AUMF \(2001\)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_of_2001) kinda puts a hole in that argument. >Trump having control over the entire military right now is not supposed to be a thing. Like at all Been that way for 25 years buddy. Yes, it's only for a specific timeframe technically but every president after Bush has found reasons to extend the timeframe whenever they've deemed it "necessary". After the AUMF passed the only limitations Presidents have is about the deployment/management of nuclear warheads, those still have to go through congress (maybe, hopefully, who knows at this point) The onus is on Congress to **cancel** the use of military force, not on the President to **request** permission to use military force. It's a loophole the size of a Nimitz class aicraft carrier and until it's removed then yes actually Trump can do whatever he wants with the US military unless Congress gows a pair and tells him to f*** off.
8
Somepotato Mar 15, 2026 +2
If they actually planned and prepared, it'd be different, but a certain pedophile has a vested interest in generating noise
2
Original-Mission-244 Mar 14, 2026 +215
Have you seen whose in charge in the US? They could f*** up a wet dream.
215
ThaCarter Mar 14, 2026 +11
Is that why they play against children?
11
ovaltine_jenkins-- Mar 14, 2026 +3
Netanyahu seems to be
3
Worthyness Mar 14, 2026 +2
They definitely fired a ton of logistics and people with experience. Turns out thats helpful in wars (or as they say, special military operation)
2
WinterSector8317 Mar 14, 2026 +149
The US, despite all recent historical evidence, is still convinced that an intense initial o*** of overwhelming violence is sufficient to either completely destroy any enemy or make them surrender and completely subjugate themselves  Trump’s administration is about to add another bullet point to that list of examples 
149
Vlaladim Mar 14, 2026 +29
It baffle me that US keep thinking that shock and awe work every time when in record it work is 50/50. I would have expected that the US have backup plan for when their main tactic don’t pan out but this admin show that that mentality of “world most powerful military in the planet” have erode the one thing military tactic need to have, adaptation and back up plans. Because this happen in a cycle, one shock and awe work> US keep doing that> the one time it didn’t work> war of attrition started> failure or victory> the government and military didn’t learn the lesson of relying on one main tactic> repeat.
29
cogman10 Mar 14, 2026 +10
The only time it's ever worked is with boots on the ground.  And even then, Afghanistan is the prime example of why it's a horrible idea.  20 years later and the US installed government collapsed the day of the US withdrawal. (It in fact was collapsing as soon as the withdrawal was announced). Iran will be identical.  If this is allowed to continue, we'll dump trillions into it and see thousands dead and when more sober minds take control, we'll be left with the same government in Iran that we tried to destroy.  The only reason this tactics has ever been "successful" is the regimes we toppled were straight dictatorships.  Iran is not that.
10
ilulillirillion Mar 14, 2026 +41
It's, somehow, way worse. They believe an o*** of violence is necessary to bring Jesus back and end the world. Many in power through this administration are as fanatical as they are depraved.
41
WinterSector8317 Mar 14, 2026 +24
I don’t think trump does, nor do any of his direct enablers/handlers.  But plenty lower down go along with this stupidity for the reason you mentioned 
24
Aazadan Mar 14, 2026 +5
They also believe that an apocalypse kicked off by a war with Iran is the best way to start that o***.
5
Sad-Society-57 Mar 14, 2026 +2
This is a war doctrine called Rapid Dominance, should anybody wish to learn more.
2
WhenTheLightHits30 Mar 14, 2026 +1
It’s remarkable, because the whole war in Ukraine really woke me up to the way a “superpower” can be felled by a thousand cuts. And that’s with a war that you can wage next door, imagine expecting Russia to be waging this same kind of war but now from across the planet. The simple economics of new war, thanks to drone technology primarily, just do not favor this mindset anymore and we are seeing the two titans of the latter 20th century engineer their own downfalls.
1
Oceanbreeze871 Mar 14, 2026 +23
All the military adults in the room told the mad king this was a very very bad idea. He said “do it my way” FAFO
23
dreadpiratewombat Mar 14, 2026 +39
Keep in mind Trump and all that Doge bullshit managed to get rid of any senior or mid-level government official with any sort of competence.  Some of them were replaced with Trump loyalists but most of the US government has no idea how things work, nor have they been around for long.  It’s a blueprint for an epic disaster.
39
Anandya Mar 14, 2026 +14
Because you guys had enough of experts.
14
mhornberger Mar 14, 2026 +2
Yep, Trump is the one making the decisions, but he was put there by an electorate sick of or indifferent to the need to defer to experts, technocrats, etc. We elected the chaos candidate. And "we" includes everyone who could have voted to prevent him from being elected, but chose not to.
2
EddieCheddar88 Mar 14, 2026 +11
Planning is woke
11
Zammin Mar 14, 2026 +11
Because our military jumped in with no plan, no concrete goals beyond aiding Israel and starting a war, no allies apart from Israel on-board or even seemingly alerted, and with all the experts fired. The current administration values literally only one quality: loyalty. Competency can be seen as dangerous, as it gives someone options. An incompetent loyalist knows they only have the position thanks to the person who gave it to them, and they'll do anything to keep it. They are relying on their utter ruthlessness and cruelty to win; it's what they've always relied on. Except ruthlessness and cruelty *aren't* good replacements for strategy and allies, and those qualities often come back to bite their users in the ass.
11
DrowningKrown Mar 14, 2026 +10
We watched drones dominate in Ukraine and Russia for years... yet when the time came our administration went "oh shit, drones". We are apparently that military that is SO well funded and dressed to the 9, but all the experience we have is fighting dudes in sandals in the Middle East. Not really against competent militaries Edit: yes, I know. Some military old heads actually have experience fighting real militaries...a long time ago. Things have changed
10
NegativeAd1432 Mar 14, 2026 +5
Yeah, to me, the one thing that the Ukraine war has proven is that war in the 21st is an entirely new game. Iran’s drone doctrine is like guerilla warfare on steroids. Meanwhile, America’s massive military is highly effective at fighting other militaries. But they have shockingly little tools to address drones that fly low enough to stay out of sight for the most part. Taking out a 30k drone with 5-10 million dollars worth of missiles is a piss poor strategy, and if that drone makes it through and takes out the billion dollar launcher, you have decisively lost that engagement. I think Iran can probably keep this pace up indefinitely, dealing millions of dollars worth of damage and ordinance spending with essentially pocket change. Remember back a month or so ago, when they mysteriously shut down the airspace around El Paso for a seemingly unplanned test of their drone defence lasers, then accidentally shot down a drone with them. I believe that is the moment when the military realized this war was going to happen, and they knew that they had nothing reasonable way to defend themselves.
5
padizzledonk Mar 14, 2026 +2
>Not even some sort of secret, either. How the hell is the US so underprepared? Lmfao.....Have you noticed the f****** idiots and morons in charge of things? Attacking Iran has been wargamed since the Shah was overthrown everything thats happened was known, they just ignored all of it The leaks about this from the pentagon and admin are going to be devastating in the coming months, i 100% guarantee tou, a 100%, that the military told everyone this was a f****** bad idea across the board and laid out what needed to be done to even have a chance of success and they were overruled. There were leaks about how bad an idea this was from the Pentagon before they did this and people were fired and demoted over it
2
YJeezy Mar 14, 2026 +35
A billion dollar dome in Qatar and others worth $100x billion. Some report $2.7b worth of radar systems. Trump/Hegseth propaganda is unreal. So hard to find info... https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/iranian-strikes-destroyed-antimissile-radars
35
fullmoon63 Mar 14, 2026 +18
People keep focusing on missile numbers, but degrading radar is a pretty smart move strategically.
18
Autumn_Ridge Mar 14, 2026 +29
A lot of the early missiles and drones could have been low value ones, just to exhaust defenses and map radar signatures.
29
Hay_Fever_at_3_AM Mar 14, 2026 +40
The drones are all the same c**** Shaheds. The radar sites are visible on satellite images, I don't know if you can really effectively hide something like that in the desert. Iran was also in a brief shooting conflict with Israel *last year* which probably helped clarify the US's interceptor systems for them.
40
D2dj Mar 14, 2026 +17
As far as I'm aware there are several different Shahed drones, some just do recon, some suicide, some drop warheads there's a bunch. It's also being reported that Russia is aiding Iran with intell which is probably more sophisticated than what Iran would have alone
17
Hay_Fever_at_3_AM Mar 14, 2026 +25
Russia has satellites, they've probably been helping with targeting
25
TheCattBaladi Mar 14, 2026 +11
Well, The US is helping the Ukrainians with satalites that killed a lot of Russians. It would make absolute sense to aid the Iranians to keep the US busy in a different place. After all, Russia is really profiting out of this war.
11
Conscious-Tutor3861 Mar 14, 2026 +3
THAAD radars, in particular, emit huge electromagnetic signatures. Those signatures are literally visible to weather and mapping satellites, so there's no real way of hiding the radars.
3
indy_110 Mar 14, 2026 +14
Yep they were targeting THAAD radar systems which coordinate high altitude missile defence, they take 8 years to build one at $300 million USD a pop and like a handful distributed around the world. They are having to relocate low priority region radars potentially creating exploitable gaps elsewhere. The other angry beaver-mole is almost certainly wiring up oil infrastructure on hair trigger explosives and looking at how much high end infrastructure they can cripple should it come to that. It'll be data centers and chip fab inputs. Two abusive idiots fighting and everyone else suffers. edit: btdubzz I'm finding my speaking more and more algospeak so two abusive idiots can work at any scale personal all the way up merchant institutions say tech and oil, gas extraction butting heads in the boardrooms, bull bucking about in a fine artisinal le epic porkelien shoppe.
14
EffectiveEconomics Mar 14, 2026 +5
It feels like Silicon Valley thinking has finally infected the military. The “move fast and break things” mantra works well for ideating through remaking of digital service queues or a stodgy customer service models, but doesn’t work so well when hardware and offensive systems don’t live up to the needs of the doctrinal shift. Iran is poised to sufffer thought the long term beating, and for all it’s failures and insanities (for gods sake just treat your people well) it could knock the USA down a few notches through mere economic warfare. The USA runs on debt and it has made the *entire *world economic opponents. While Iran is chewed up with real weapons all they need to fight back is to stop a few oil shipments. There’s never been a better time in history to strike at that one thing.
5
koi-lotus-water-pond Mar 14, 2026 +1
All this flipping money could go towards feeding people, universal healthcare, paying off student loan debt, free college/trade school, filling potholes, pick your environmental disaster, the homeless, etc., etc. ANYTHING other than bombing Iranian school girls.
1
EffectiveEconomics Mar 14, 2026 +1
The war is about a lot more than that one target, but yes, it could be helping people. Look to history to understand if that's a reasonable ask.
1
Oceanbreeze871 Mar 14, 2026 +10
Yeah doctrine is to use 2-3 interceptors per threat….snd they take months to replenish.
10
InevitableAvalanche Mar 14, 2026 +231
Where are all the conservatives? Why aren't they speaking out against this?
231
halomate1 Mar 14, 2026 +179
Its morning time in Russia, we’ll be hearing from them in a bit
179
xxxkillahxxx Mar 14, 2026 +97
Conservatives have become the cowards. They’re scared of him and they orange rings around their mouths.
97
jst4wrk7617 Mar 14, 2026 +27
They always were.
27
8ackwoods Mar 14, 2026 +5
They always were
5
Zaptryx Mar 14, 2026 +53
I visited the sub yesterday. Saw one of them that said "if this war isnt fast, im never voting again, because both sides are broken" or something like that. Like brother! Your side is broken.
53
PotentialAnt9670 Mar 14, 2026 +4
First time ever seeing a "both-sides" comment on a conservative thread
4
DrowningKrown Mar 14, 2026 +15
Wow, you found a halfway dumb one. I had somebody tell me yesterday that trump ran on taking nukes away from Iran, and that's why they voted for him. So yea, sounds like MAGA is half "war!!" And half "hmm idkkk 👉🏼👈🏼"
15
succesful_deception Mar 14, 2026 +11
At least he's admitting his side is broken which is very rare among them.
11
Taurpion Mar 14, 2026 +12
He will still vote red. They aren’t serious people.
12
ezagreb Mar 14, 2026 +12
They don’t speak out against anything
12
Elegant_Situation285 Mar 14, 2026 +12
they are currently installing new pro-war firmware.
12
Halloqween Mar 14, 2026 +6
I went to their sub to see their discourse on the school bombings once it came out that it was a tomahawk, and they just simply weren’t talking about it. They don’t discuss anything that could challenge their beliefs, partly due to they don’t actually have any, outside of undying loyalty to one man.
6
uncen5ored Mar 14, 2026 +6
Every conservative I know on socials has basically completely disconnected from the news and politics. They don’t make a single post.
6
Arthur_Wellesley1815 Mar 14, 2026 +125
Better drag Hillary into a hearing
125
melithium Mar 14, 2026 +113
He watches foxnews. They dont report this.
113
MerlinsMentor Mar 14, 2026 +2
It's this. I spoke to a Fox news viewer the other day, and heard a 10-minute description of Somali day care fraud (some of which I later realized was disingenuously false... like "no kids are even there!"... when the "investigator" was looking for kids at 8am at an after-school only facility). But Iran? "I guess we're at war with Iran now." There is a serious amount of disinformation going on. Fox News is, and always has been, Republican propaganda. That is their only goal. That's pretty much literally why it exists in the first place.
2
PackageLost1391 Mar 14, 2026 +37
As a American f the trump admin and their pos leadership. Unfortunate for the soldiers and their families who have no cognizable role in this. Trump, I hope you live whatever illness plagues you because you will be seeing prison after your presidency.
37
nw342 Mar 14, 2026 +20
Radar for a C-RAM was destroyed
20
Impossible-Bed3728 Mar 14, 2026 +6
pathetic on our part.
6
Miss_Maple_Dream Mar 14, 2026 +17
They’re going to have to release the Epstein files to distract from the monumental fuckup with Iran et al
17
Rellim03 Mar 14, 2026 +42
I don't even believe Trump's words about Iran having almost no missiles left. Iran has been preparing for this for about 20 years. They got so many mobile launchers underground. So many drones. Trumps needs to win the war quickly, before oil prices rise and before causing much harm to the elections. Iran just needs not to lose, and will absolutely follow the Afghanistan 19 years playbook to victory. And when the war does end Trump will call it a victory and spin it as a win no matter what.
42
liptickletaffy Mar 14, 2026 +6
This has been shocking to me that even people that usually question official pentagon bs are swallowing this lie. Iran is shepherding resources for a long conflict, it couldn't be clearer. Hezbollah shot hundreds into Northern Israel the other day, even they have large stockpiles. It's wishful thinking on steroids.
6
OM3N1R Mar 14, 2026 +9
WTF when did Reuters start paywalling? We're down to just AP news now for factual wire reporting.....
9
Any_Translator6613 Mar 14, 2026 +19
I believe you mean the missile was successfully intercepted by the helipad.
19
Ok-Assistant-8615 Mar 14, 2026 +22
Must have been friendly fire, if it was a different country media would be calling it x strikes y, but now they will say missiles fall on helipad
22
Best-Statistician294 Mar 14, 2026 +21
Being a fan of the board game Risk!....maybe having bases all across the Middle East was a poor strategy.
21
Any_Translator6613 Mar 14, 2026 +27
I dunno, I think it was a decent strategy when we used the threat of bombing Iran to hell as a way to moderate its bahevior. The trouble is that we played that (pretty good) card when we didn't need to, and now we have a shitty hand and no leverage.
27
blogoman Mar 14, 2026 +14
We even had another card in our hand in the form of the JCPOA, but Trump tore up the card rather than play one that Obama had secured.
14
Any_Translator6613 Mar 14, 2026 +5
In his defense, it was delicious with ketchup.
5
CardinalM1 Mar 14, 2026 +2
We should've taken Australia first before trying to take the Middle East. Classic beginner mistake.
2
nutsygenius Mar 14, 2026 +3
Sadly, we'll be hearing similar reports again and again soon. Like, how many in 24 hrs??
3
bottombracketak Mar 14, 2026 +12
How could Democrats allow this to happen?! /s
12
fupadog Mar 14, 2026 +3
The fact that you even needed an /s says it all
3
Ok_Pollution7093 Mar 14, 2026 +11
Embassy helipad getting hit. Someone's trying to send a message without starting World War 3.
11
MrMichaelJames Mar 14, 2026 +3
For basically hitting a concrete driveway?
3
trollanonymous Mar 14, 2026 +11
This is response to Trump hitting Khark. Basically saying you hit Khark, we will obliterate the embassy.
11
slayer1am Mar 14, 2026 +81
If Iran manages to put so much pressure on the US that it results in the orange doofus getting impeached, I'll buy an Iranian flag and hang it in front of my house.
81
Rev-Dr-Slimeass Mar 14, 2026 +27
I really hate America for putting the world in this position, but you are never going to get me to root for Iran. America is right about it being an oppressive regime.
27
StrongAroma Mar 14, 2026 +55
America is an oppressive regime too, who gives a shit
55
chillichampion Mar 14, 2026 +2
There are a lot of oppressive regimes in the world. Why single out Iran? Not to mention the apartheid regime next to it is far worse.
2
Superguy766 Mar 14, 2026
Did Iran attack the US during 9/11?
0
PBFT Mar 14, 2026 +11
I'll take 'Trolls masquerading as left-wing progressives' for 400, Alex.
11
Tornare Mar 14, 2026 +23
Nah, f*** Iran. Two evils don’t make a good. F*** them both.
23
[deleted] Mar 14, 2026 +35
Tough crowd tonight
35
punk62 Mar 14, 2026 +23
Nice profile pic
23
Zes_Teaslong Mar 14, 2026 +11
Now kith
11
AgentVN Mar 14, 2026 +1
Whose face is that? Been wondering cuz I see it a lot
1
legoman102040 Mar 14, 2026 +4
Just flex your own country if it isn't so obviously contempt with new age bullshit. Goddamn its so easy to be patriotic of any country not the USA right now
4
Tornare Mar 14, 2026 +15
I live in the US. But f*** Trump and the entire current government and f*** Iran. It’s that simple.
15
Muronelkaz Mar 14, 2026 +2
lion and sun flag\*
2
NoobChumpsky Mar 14, 2026 +3
The age old plan of getting rid of everyone competent then engaging in a task that requires extreme competence and flawless execution. What could go wrong?
3
LoserBroadside Mar 14, 2026 +3
“Wait they shoot BACK?!” -Whiskey Pete
3
Big-Option3118 Mar 14, 2026 +2
I guess they were friendly fire missiles?
2
No_Mistake_1778 Mar 14, 2026 +2
Good thing Iran has boots on the ground to deal with, plus does anyone know if Israel accomplished the invasion of Lebanon
2
Ivegotabadname Mar 14, 2026 +1
What is this trying to say?
1
Ivegotabadname Mar 14, 2026 +3
/ scene/ Hegseth walks in. "What's up in Iran bitches?" General: "sir, it's going to take months if what we understand is our objective. " Pete: "b**** just do it. I don't care. F*** you, do it faster. Fastest, greatest, perfect that's it... yeah. Oh was i touching myself? Well f*** you I'll Jen off when I want Go cry to noem and see what she says. Her "husband" flashed her at 13. She doesn't give a shit. / end scene/
3
GeshtiannaSG Mar 14, 2026 +1
“Don’t need to worry about it.”
1
bobbymoose Mar 14, 2026 +1
Green zone breach incoming, no helipad rescue
1
BigBoyYuyuh Mar 14, 2026 +1
Oh well. Wouldn’t have happened if Trump didn’t start this war.
1
MrMichaelJames Mar 14, 2026 +1
Was anything on the helipad? If not this is just a missile hitting a concrete slab.
1
AntonioBarbarian Mar 14, 2026 +1
From the video I've seen, it looked like something was on fire on top the pad, and I don't think a simple concrete slab would catch fire, even after a missile strike.
1
MrMichaelJames Mar 14, 2026 +1
It depends what that something is. I haven’t seen any video so I have no clue but no one else is talking about it which makes me think this is nothing big.
1
ApprehensiveAd7586 Mar 14, 2026 +1
Helipad or satellite communications system and potentially its C-RAM?
1
NovelDraft5175 Mar 14, 2026 +1
All republican pedophile protection approved
1
← Back to Board