If only people showed up to the one that was held in November 2024
481
ScrungulusBungulusMar 27, 2026
+146
People still have too much to lose. They don't want to protest when it's inconvenient to them (I can't miss work/school, it's too cold out, I'm busy that weekend, etc.)
We haven't reached the threshold where people stop giving a shit
146
RealitygormondMar 27, 2026
+26
We've been there for upwards of 10 years now.
26
2131andBeyondMar 27, 2026
+37
If we’ve been there then more people would care to vote. The point is that we’re clearly not there yet.
37
RealitygormondMar 27, 2026
+9
Sorry. I misread. My post was meant that we're still at the point that most people don't give enough of a shit.
9
ShiraCheshireMar 28, 2026
+3
I can't blame someone for not wanting to leave their children homeless and starving after they're shot to death for protesting, or lose their job because they were attacked by the police and ended up disabled. Or fired for just going at all when they had a scheduled shift.
3
KathrynTheGreatMar 28, 2026
+4
Especially when their healthcare is tied to their job.
4
ImHIM_nuffsaidMar 27, 2026
+51
Where the f*** have you been? People did show up in Nov ‘24. Musk and Trump very obviously stole it (thy told everyone at least three times).
51
itsprobablytrueMar 27, 2026
+36
Trump: “they stole the election “
36
That_OneOstrichMar 28, 2026
+7
The best defense is saying they're doing it not me.
I think it's odd that musk is so involved with the government and increasing his wealth doing so while not elected in any capacity. And that he was at all involved in voting machines.
But I won't say Trump stole the election. I will say he (this administration) is attempting to rig future ones.
7
NotTattooedWifeMar 28, 2026
+16
I'm not going to say Trump stole the election and that Elon helped him but....
Trump said that he didn't need any more votes because he had enough votes.
Trump said that Musk knew a lot of things about computers.
Voting machines were linked to Musk technology.
Trump has been caught trying to rig an election before.
16
Creative_Ad_8338Mar 28, 2026
+6
Everything computer... everything.
6
Miserable-Savings751Mar 28, 2026
+6
Let’s assume that is true. Did anyone do anything about it? Nope.
So does it matter if it is true or not? Nope.
6
FloridaMMJInfoMar 27, 2026
+2
This! They stole the election, dems just didn’t want to sound like the orange shithead so they didn’t challenge anything
2
WalkingDeadPixelMar 27, 2026
+15
They always have to take "the high road" and show that they're the "better people", as if that's mattered at all in the last decade. When only one party attempts respectability, they're the party that's going to lose.
15
LumberBitchMar 28, 2026
+3
Honestly I feel like they only do this as cover for not really giving enough of a shit. So many Democrats give "I just work here" energy
3
Alexm920Mar 27, 2026
+610
Even if the administration doesn't respond to the protests, don't forget there is real value in getting out there. Protests can be useful in many ways; finding community, speaking out, and learning how you can be more involved are all critical too. Even just seeing that you're not the only one who feels like they're going insane is worth the time.
610
Silver-Bread4668Mar 27, 2026
+176
With all the crazy shit going on in the world to stress about - if nothing else, it just feels good to get out there with people and not feel isolated.
Also, Dropkick Murphys are playing at the Boston No Kings protest tomorrow.
176
moneyfishMar 27, 2026
+38
> Also, Dropkick Murphys are playing at the Boston No Kings protest tomorrow.
I love how Facebook conservatives call the Dropkick Murphys a one song band and then they love Kid Rock lol.
38
Homesick_MartianMar 27, 2026
+13
If drop kick Murphy are a one song band, kid rock is a one verse band.
Baw di baw di dang di dang diddy
13
moneyfishMar 27, 2026
+3
Seriously. They get so mad that they can’t find good artists to support them.
3
Tree_SureMar 27, 2026
+23
I think they should protest in front of Congress and push a lot of pressure on them.
23
-jp-Mar 27, 2026
+110
There's a concept known as the [3.5% rule](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3.5%25_rule) that says just a minute fraction of the population peacefully protesting is all it takes to achieve political change. You cross that threshold and you get the entirety of the undecided and apathetic on your side.
Every time one of these protests hit my local subs, somebody shows up reeeeeing about how they're a waste of time to try to get people to stay home. They don't know about the 3.5% rule, but their handlers god damn well do.
110
AllIdeasMar 27, 2026
+50
Sort of. It's not a day of single action, it's a systematic pattern of resistance by a meaningful portion of the population, with more participation leading to higher odds of success. The 3.5 percent is a semi arbitrary cutoff.
But simultaneously, not everyone needs to specifically be there that day. They could protest/resist in other ways on other days, for example, and not everyone out on the street is necessarily part of a pattern of resistance although of course it's a good sign and strong start.
50
Alexm920Mar 27, 2026
+73
The last No Kings nation-wide protest day draw \~5-7 million participants (depending on who is estimating), making it one of the largest mass protest on record. With a US population of \~348 million, that's about 2%. It's not unthinkable, given how quickly things are getting worse, that 1.5x as many people show up this weekend, or to the next one. 3.5% is a lot closer than a lot of people realize.
73
moneyfishMar 27, 2026
+21
> Every time one of these protests hit my local subs, somebody shows up reeeeeing about how they're a waste of time
My favorite comment is when they tell everyone how little they care about the protests while commenting on every post about the protests lol.
21
-jp-Mar 27, 2026
+8
Ha, yeah, I noticed that too. They care even more than the people actually holding the signs. 😅
8
wrex779Mar 27, 2026
+24
The examples listed in that study only apply to autocratic nations. Not to mention they cherry picked a few movements throughout history and conveniently ignored all the ones that failed.
24
-jp-Mar 27, 2026
+18
Man, I dunno how to break this to you, but we *are* an autocratic nation. What did you think Unitary Executive Theory and Project 2025 was trying to accomplish?
18
wrex779Mar 27, 2026
+20
Autocratic regimes tend to suppress any form of protest before they spread. 3.5% of the population protesting is significant because it's an indicator that the regime has failed at that and risks losing control. It's different from a western democracy where citizens have a right to protest and is treated as a national pastime. I'm not saying we shouldn't hold these protests, but it's naive to think that things will change as soon as we reach a magic number.
20
-jp-Mar 27, 2026
+11
I get your point but it's not at all a magic number. It's an observed number. The breaking point for popular support for a movement is surprisingly low. That's all the rule is saying.
11
syynapt1kMar 27, 2026
+3
Regardless of any magic number, historians and political scientists agree that protesting is an effective catalyst for change.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/25/protests-effective-history-impact
3
kemushi_waruiMar 28, 2026
+2
> Autocratic regimes tend to suppress any form of protest before they spread.
One could argue that suppression takes many forms. In the US, for now, it's not literal physical suppression, sure, but there is tons of passive *psychological* suppression in the form of media manipulation.
Getting 3.5% out under these circumstances is just as significant.
[Edit: typo]
2
OdoWanKenobiMar 27, 2026
+23
This misrepresents the data, though. 3.5 % of the people engaged in consistent protest and resistance can make change. 3.5% of the people standing around, out of the way, for a few hours on a Saturday and then going home at a set time does not.
23
Particular-Ice4615Mar 27, 2026
+10
No one will listen to that 3.5% until there is something like 25% unemployment like during the depression. The average American yuppie thats the last bastion of actual middle class wealth left whom the entire liberal political machine caters exclusively to, still lives too comfortably. Tho whose retirement savings is still intact and growing (thanks to the likes raytheon and Lockheed, and exxon and the fund managers investing people's savings on their behalf).
You'd need a complete market collapse and sweeping white collar unemployment before people like that wake up.
I'm in that cohort and the number of my colleagues completely oblivious and unbothered by this tyrant because they still have a high paying cushy office job and a well funded 401k, insulating them from the worst of the down stream market forces from Trump's horrendous unilateral economic policy is mind boggling.
My parents took part in protests before being truly cracked down by the army and secret police in their home country before eventually being forced to flee, and trust me when I say the average American is spoiled in comparison to the stories they've told me about fighting despotism.
Even the ones who are "protesting" are barely trying at this point precisely because they still have too much too lose and are living too comfortably in comparison to other despotic regimes that study cites. These are barely protests they are glorified sanctioned parades. Things need to get a waay worse before real change happens.
There's barely any true civil disobedience happening in modern American protests, marching in a parade is not the same as blocking points of trades, mass labour strikes, tax revolts, sabotaging capital, and blocking the oligarchs and wealthy the means to engage in commerce.
10
-jp-Mar 27, 2026
+2
The average American is living paycheck to paycheck, and Trump's buffoonery is *wrecking* them. It's an ocean of gasoline just waiting for a match.
2
AnonymityIsForChumpsMar 27, 2026
+5
Well yes, but also no.
For one thing, that "rule" (more of an observation) comes from a single Harvard study, which later had a followup where they did find examples where the rule didn't hold, such as against the King of Bahrain during the Arab Spring. I highly encourage you to read the authors folloup publication here:
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/2024-05/Erica%2520Chenoweth_2020-005.pdf
But more importantly, it was only for movements that have the explicit goal of toppling the government. In the case of Trump, that would look like at least removing Trump and then passing a constitutional amendment to allow for an emergency election to replace him, and possibly as much as a full rewrite of the entire US constitution.
If 3.5% supported that, then many more people would likely support a slightly less maximalist position, like remove Trump from office and have Vance replace him, with no fundamental change to the US government.
No Kings is simply not a movement that aims to topple the US government. They're not even explicitly calling for anyone to be removed from office. Under the standards of the study, the No Kings marches wouldn't have even been included since it is a reformist movement, and reformist movements aren't what the study discusses.
5
WhenIWannabeMEMar 27, 2026
+20
I have found all protests I've attended to be extremely helpful for exactly what is mentioned in this comment. It was incredibly therapeutic because it reminded me I am not alone in being incredibly frustrated and upset with our political situation in a way that seeing pictures of these protests doesn't provide. Just go. 99% of the time you just stand there and chit chat. A lot of the ones I've attended have had music, poetry, and speeches as well. Ends up feeling more like a day out to renew hope than anything.
20
BatheMyDogMar 28, 2026
+2
I’ve only been able to drag myself to one protest so far. I am absolutely terrified of large crowds. The one I went to was fairly small so I was able to work through the anxiety. After a couple hours, I was screaming with everyone else. It was freeing being able to release all the rage. I was pleasantly surprised at how many people in that very very red district were anti ICE. Afterwards, I felt more at peace than I ever have in my life.
So even if you’re anxious, push through it and go anyway. You can always leave if it’s too much.
2
littleemilythrowMar 27, 2026
+9
I saw somebody say “protests are just for the people protesting” like it was some kind of profound dunk from a lazy a****** who’s never done anything for anyone else in his life.
And I was like… Yeah, that’s the point. If these assholes were going to listen to us, we wouldn’t have to protest it. It’s about coming together and showing our power and feeling it.
9
SugarDue8160Mar 27, 2026
+4
This administration is petty and stupid. They responded to the previous protests by posting cartoon videos of king Trump dumping feces in protesters and tearing down the Whitehouse. It obviously gets under their skin.
That's a good reason to go!!
4
Unable_Technology935Mar 27, 2026
+2
Indeed.Im a 70 year old b******. I'm hitting the streets tomorrow for the first time in many years. Sitting on my ass whining about Trump and this fascist administration isn't cutting it anymore. Time to get the blood flowing again!
2
Fickle_Competition33Mar 27, 2026
+1
The Executive might not give a bleep. But be sure that Legislative level cares a lot about protests.
1
KesilismsMar 27, 2026
+1
That’s what they thought at J6, jackass. If the FBI is as evil as you claim it is, you wouldn’t be going. It only takes a couple trouble makers to spoil the bunch.
1
BakerIsMyNameMar 27, 2026
+208
The amount of bots saying "there is no point, don't go, protests don't work" make it clear that it's important for people to get out there and show up.
Kinda seems like money is being spent to convince people to stay home.
208
SpicyChoriMar 27, 2026
+33
It would be great if you actually did something like a general strike rather than an authorized protest on a weekend, but hey maybe this protest will be the turning point. good luck weekend warriors
33
ThewarlockminerMar 27, 2026
+19
Indeed. I have never in my almost 30 years of life seen a political protest against government result in anything other than empty promises that get reversed the second people stop caring.
For example the Black lives matter protests. Most major cities and democrats claimed to care about police reform. Then the moment we stopped marching they reversed the order to use police funding for something else and even voted to provide more funding to police. Now when we hear about police murdering, unjust killing of an unarmed black man and I rarely hear about widespread protests. Demand for changes etc.
I dont even really hear them mentioning abortion rights anymore, they were loud about it after the overturning of Roe V wade. I haven't seen or heard of a hands off our uterus march since.
19
Venom7355Mar 27, 2026
+2
They’re not bots they’re real people. Name any major protest in the last 5 years that led to anything significant in the US? Getting out and voting Democrats back in is much more impactful.
2
AwesomeWhiteDudeMar 27, 2026
+11
Still value in local networking
11
BananaCuchoMar 28, 2026
+5
And raising awareness
5
commitmeMar 28, 2026
+5
some are bots and the rest live overseas but get paid to post doomerism on certain topics
5
KathrynTheGreatMar 28, 2026
+3
I don't think a lot of people overseas realize just how huge the US is and how we can't just do a major nationwide protest. Many of them also have nationalized healthcare, so they don't understand why people don't want to lose their jobs because of their health insurance.
3
ImpartialAntagonistMar 27, 2026
+3
You do not bring down a fascist government by holding hands in the streets and waving signs with epic burns written on them. White Americans have never had to face a domestic tyrannical government and these pathetic little parties, which is what they are, proves how servile and castrated the average citizen is. Nepal organized a revolution just last year.
3
Zombie_CoolMar 27, 2026
+89
The marches have been great, but do we do if protesting continues to go unheard and November does not turn out as we'd hope?
89
AmaroWolfwoodMar 27, 2026
+100
Protests have multiple uses. Obviously as a display of unrest, and in a functioning government, these cries are heard and leaders attempt to appease the public. We have leadership that outright disdains criticism so that isn't likely to do anything.
Secondly these protests seek to shape public opinion. Those too uninvolved or indifferent or uninformed to join the cause have the chance to see what people are against. What their arguments are and as awareness grows, the movement grows.
But another purpose of protests is to build communities and organizations within those protests. Like minded individuals gathering and forming connections is how the public bolsters it's defenses against tyranny and dictatorship. Maybe the line for outright rebellion hasn't been crossed for enough Americans to act, but waiting to form connections until after the government is fully and violently oppressive to too many people is too late.
All this is why authoritarian regimes like our current administration are desperate to villanize and discourage dissent by labeling it terrorism and unpatriotic. They fear an uprising and use fear to suppress the public, as fascists do.
100
Optimus_Prime_DayMar 27, 2026
+8
That all assumes that the media airs anything about them. They've been increasingly ignoring them and skipping even mentioning these protests more and more.
8
09f3jnsMar 27, 2026
+3
What do you mean? My local NBC affiliate has been talking about this protest for the last 2 weeks and it hasn't even happened yet.
3
Gurlllllllll-Mar 28, 2026
+2
You'll see a lot of people claim that Americans only protest once every 4 months in threads like these. Because this is one of the only protest they sometimes hear about. They might have heard a little bit about Minnesotan protests, but they don't hear about communities there that are still resisting ICE. They don't hear about nationwide movements of resistance, like people following ICE vehicles, forming human chains around ICE raid targets, etc.
Mainstream media is largely ignoring the resistance, mutual aid, and protests that are happening outside of the literal biggest events. And so you have people who think that Americans aren't doing anything.
2
-jp-Mar 27, 2026
+64
Short of violent uprising? A general strike would do it. Shut down the economy for even a single day and you'll get anything you demand. They need us more than we need them.
64
ataranaranMar 27, 2026
+6
this is why we need to gather and form communities, as in physical, we-live-near-to-each other communities as well as the internet geographically dispersed ones. A disconnected group won't commit to something like this; but a large community with lots of different organizations, actions, and groups addressing lots of different concerns, well, those are the people who know and trust each other and can put together things like rent funds and strike funds, to address food insecurity, other basic needs... The big protests are a way to go and physically meet the people around you who feel the same to start getting involved and organized.
6
hedgetankMar 27, 2026
+5
Unfortunately, I'm afraid we're going to have to do more than a general strike at this point.
5
Aryk93Mar 27, 2026
+4
Just look at how the TSA debacle just got the senate to unanimously fund the TSA - and NOT ICE or CBP
4
Equivalent_Range6291Mar 27, 2026
+13
Exactly, i\`ve been advocating that for a while but a lot of the Americans i was talking to considered both me & striking as Communist! ..
Will America *ever* learn?
Even a tiny wee bit ..
13
HrekiresMar 27, 2026
+24
The problem with advocating for a general strike in America is the lack of organized labor in the country.
General strikes don't just happen organically, and usually they're backed by a means to help people pay their bills while they're not working.
24
Own-Satisfaction4427Mar 27, 2026
+3
We need leaders to be organizing and preparing for every option. The Conservatives are planning for every option, so should we.
3
recyclopath_Mar 27, 2026
+25
Go to the march, fine a table of people doing something in your community to make a difference and volunteer for their cause.
Get off your ass.
Don't just whine about how it won't matter anyway.
25
Equivalent_Range6291Mar 27, 2026
+5
Link the Marches up & march on Washington.
That will quickly matter..
A lot!
5
Jacques7HammerMar 27, 2026
+17
We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas
17
OriginalSpraxMar 27, 2026
+1
[ Removed by Reddit ]
1
isaidflarkitMar 27, 2026
+35
please protest as much as possible against this criminal president, he will burn down the entire world if no there is no pushback by the american public, millions of innocent people's lives are on the line, american people are the only ones who have the power to stop this madness.
35
TintedApostleMar 27, 2026
+9
The weather is getting warmer. The spring and summer will be busy.
9
09f3jnsMar 27, 2026
+3
So many people in January-March of 2025 were saying "How come nobody is protesting???" like it's 40 degrees here and drizzling and we get 10 hours of light. Look at most of the big protests in US history and you find they regularly happen in the summer.
3
TintedApostleMar 27, 2026
+2
Wars are the same way. Winter offensives are difficult and rare (See Napoleon or Hitler). Most wars are active in spring through fall.
2
ElsiesEelsMar 27, 2026
+12
Protest by cutting WAY back on spending. The companies who own our government could not care less what people do with their free time. As long as people go to work and spend money, the people in power will never change. Are people really expecting these rich assholes to suddenly change and start to care after the umpteenth protest? They say insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results.
12
Additional_Way5929Mar 28, 2026
+2
Trumpflation will force people to cut way back.
2
i_hate_gift_cardsMar 27, 2026
+4
^(Could NOT care less )
^(or)
^(Couldn't care less)
4
ElsiesEelsMar 27, 2026
+5
Thank youuuu. Tis fixed
5
i_hate_gift_cardsMar 27, 2026
+3
You're definitely not alone!
I'm wondering if it would be more beneficial during the protests to have people with signs saying " unsubscribe from Amazon Plus" while giving treats to people who unsubscribe right there.
Im slightly tempted 😅
3
invalidpasswordMar 27, 2026
+49
This will be the first anti-Trump protest my 71 year-old husband will miss. He had a surgical procedure in San Francisco (a 5 hour drive) yesterday and we won't let him. He will be cranking out political cartoons on Instagram though — while I write, he draws.
49
anonUSAFguyMar 27, 2026
+21
The phrase “No Kings” will never resonate the way democrats want to reach independent voters. I already hear people at work saying “ we dont have a king so the protests dont make sense”.
If they went with something like “Save Democracy” it becomes a rally for a good cause, not the “whining liberal protest” that the GOP will make it out to be.
MAGA was framed as a positive movement. If democrats want to be successful, they need to rally around saving democracy, installing guardrails to prevent what’s happening, and bringing prosperity and equal rights to all as framed by the constitution.
Running on an anti-Trump platform won’t work.
21
MalaixMar 27, 2026
+9
> If they went with “Save Democracy” it becomes a rally for a good cause, not a “complaint session” that the GOP will make it out to be
Honestly even that. Democrats literally ran citing Trump's own anti-Democratic history and habits and no one really cared to vote anyway. People forget America is a nation of WILLING nonvoters. We don't value Democracy really. We say we do. But most of us don't give a f***.
Republicans actively and openly hate Democracy. They like to disassociate with the entire word these days with the "its a republic!' c***.
Democrats say they like democracy then they coronate tenured bought out elites and skip primaries and hand key positions and committee leaderships to no name unpopular people while overlooking popular candidates. DNC leadership are elites with insider group c*** going on all the time.
And independents? Most of them don't even vote. Period.
So who here likes Democracy for the sake of it?
Nah the message would be simpler and more appealing if it was just meaner. Biden won on Trump's negative electoralism. Its petty and stupid but a "F*** Trump" rally would probably have the most resonating message sadly. Most Americans are more animated to be against something or if they feel they are attacking an enemy than if you told them they are fighting for something.
We don't have a list of dreams and we can't envision good futures. What we have is a list of enemies and the spite to see them torn down generally. Its something we need to work on but right now I think its the socio-political reality of America.
9
09f3jnsMar 27, 2026
+6
Trump has referred to himself as a King or a Dictator about 10 times already. He'll probably do it again this week. And he is legislating via executive order, calling to unseat any judge that rules against him, and bypassing Congress as often as possible (just yesterday he said out loud that he called Iran an "excursion" instead of a "war" because if you call it a war it needs Congressional approval).
>“Save Democracy”
We already have a democracy.
>"Black Lives Matter"
And white ones don't?
You ignore the criticism from concern trolls who have absolutely no interest in the movement.
6
Fit-Personality-1834Mar 27, 2026
+5
I’m f****** sick of the democrats self-scrutinizing our messaging. Independent voters don’t need to be coddled, if they don’t know by now what’s at stake then messaging isn’t going to suddenly cure their blindness.
Pain is one of the strongest signals that can be understood. America made its choice, and until the consequences of that choice set in for people one by one, I expect nothing different at the voting booth.
5
Frequent_Slip2455Mar 27, 2026
+1
Well because the people who started no kings are mentally challenged.
1
OiggamedMar 27, 2026
+7
They should happen every day.
7
nasolodakimMar 28, 2026
+2
No Kings but plenty of balloon monarchs I guess
2
Street-Wear-2925Mar 27, 2026
+5
Be careful out there people.
5
Additional_Way5929Mar 28, 2026
+4
Historically, fascist governments fail when at least 3% of the population publicly protests.
4
izzgoMar 28, 2026
+2
I've always heard it was [3.5%](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3.5%25_rule) But your point still stands. I'm just a bit of a fanatic for accurate statements.
2
AmaroWolfwoodMar 27, 2026
+7
To the naysayers and cautiously skeptical, a reminder: Protests have multiple uses. Obviously as a display of unrest, and in a functioning government, these cries are heard and leaders attempt to appease the public. We have leadership that outright disdains criticism so that isn't likely to do anything.
Secondly these protests seek to shape public opinion. Those too uninvolved or indifferent or uninformed to join the cause have the chance to see what people are against. What their arguments are and as awareness grows, the movement grows.
But another purpose of protests is to build communities and organizations within those protests. Like minded individuals gathering and forming connections is how the public bolsters it's defenses against tyranny and dictatorship. Maybe the line for outright rebellion hasn't been crossed for enough Americans to act, but waiting to form connections until after the government is fully and violently oppressive to too many people is too late.
All this is why authoritarian regimes like our current administration are desperate to villanize and discourage dissent by labeling it terrorism and unpatriotic. They fear an uprising and use fear to suppress the public, as fascists do.
7
YetifromtheSerengetiMar 27, 2026
+5
If no kings has the ambition to be the “name brand” protest then they should also have the responsibility to make these gatherings effective beyond “it’s good to network with others”.
There will be a huge turn out. People complaining that it was disappointing will still go tomorrow. It’s not wrong to be frustrated that an organizing of this many people aligned to a same cause isn’t doing anything actionable with all that power they successfully generated.
5
GarnetOblivion1Mar 27, 2026
+2
How many will be in liberal areas versus conservative? That’s the metric I’m interested in.
2
MadRaymerMar 27, 2026
+11
I assume most protests will be in cities since that's where people live, and almost all cities (even in red states) are liberal areas.
11
hirudoredoMar 27, 2026
+4
even small towns have been showing up. they may not have the most impressive numbers, but some around me had like 100 people turn out in towns of 2-3k, mostly MAGAfied, and it easily blew out previous protests for hyper-local issues that supposedly more people cared about in general.
Even my hometown, deep ruby red country, had a notable showing at the last one. People are pissed and feel helpless.
4
MalaixMar 27, 2026
+2
If you want insight on that kind of stuff its more useful to look at all the races lately where seats have flipped by like double digits in the opposite direction honestly. Which has been happening. Why settle for the amorphous calculations of protest attendance where people move all over when you have rock solid empirical data known as exit polls?
2
surfergrrl6Mar 27, 2026
+2
[At least 22 ‘No Kings’ protests scheduled across Alabama Saturday](https://alabamareflector.com/2026/03/27/at-least-22-no-kings-protests-scheduled-across-alabama-saturday/)
2
cjneulsMar 27, 2026
+1
Pretty sure you guys accomplished this goal we haven’t had a king in 250 years
1
09f3jnsMar 27, 2026
+1
Why does the President refer to himself as a King and a Dictator, legislate via executive order, bypass Congress, call to unseat federal judges who disagree with him, and say he should run for a 3rd term?
1
Initial-Bass-5866Mar 27, 2026
+3
Why do people think he gives a shit about protests?
What do they actually think this will accomplish?
They people are all just trying to make themselves feel good by joining a safe group that will collapse the Moment it’s challenged. These protests are pathetic, f****** do something you pansy ass b**** Americans
3
[deleted]Mar 27, 2026
[removed]
0
[deleted]Mar 27, 2026
+7
[removed]
7
Icy_Rub3371Mar 27, 2026
-1
It's time. Patriots step up!
No Kings March 28th
Orland Patk, IL
147th & LaGrange
We're not gonna take it anymore!
-1
bunny-girl-420Mar 27, 2026
-10
Dont tell anyone you are going and leave your phones at home
-10
pyrotekk212Mar 27, 2026
+37
Counter-productive advice. Tell everyone you are going and invite them to come with you. Upload footage on social media and spread it far and wide.
The movement gains momentum by spreading word of mouth. The media is not going to cover it, we need to cover it ourselves.
37
hrvbrsMar 27, 2026
+2
I guarantee you Rachel Maddow will cover this.
2
smurfsundermybedMar 27, 2026
+4
Or make sure you know how to quickly enable lockdown mode on your phone.
4
StruggleBoy1999Mar 27, 2026
+4
Can I ask why? Id typicaly think that the opposite would be a better idea?
4
Fallenking652Mar 27, 2026
+9
They have what are basically mobile cell phone towers that get your phones ID number and can then track you from it. And with this administration using admin warrents they would like have your cell company dump the last 30 days of your history. Texts, calls, and what you looked at what you clicked on. They build a profile and you go on the "naughty" list and if you get in trouble ever they bring the hammer and throw the book at you. They been doing a version of this since 60s mind you. Technology just made it easier.
9
zzztokenMar 27, 2026
+8
Cybersecurity professional here to tell y’all this person ^ is not bluffing at all. Look up Stingrays. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/06/quick-and-dirty-guide-cell-phone-surveillance-protests
8
swagonflyyyyMar 27, 2026
+3
Just use a faraday bag. Put your phone in airplane mode and store it in the faraday bag. This will block all inbound/outbound signals to your phone and nothing will penetrate it.
3
Heroic_SheperdMar 27, 2026
+1
This is the one that finally gets him removed. Let’s do this guys!
1
herisshippMar 28, 2026
+1
Balloon guy looks ready to float away from all this
1
AccountInTheNegativeMar 28, 2026
+1
A reminder: When you get home from your "No Kings" protest this weekend- Trump will STILL be YOUR President.
113 Comments