· 199 comments · Save ·
For Sale Mar 23, 2026 at 4:18 PM

Ms. Rachel Says ‘I Am Political’ as She Fights to Close ICE Facility in Texas That’s Detaining Children: ‘It’s Political to Believe Every Child Is Equal’

Posted by Unusual-State1827


https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/ms-rachel-ice-facility-detains-children-dilley-texas-1236696574/

🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Unusual-State1827 Mar 23, 2026 +2359
>“I am political,” Accurso told the news outlet. “It’s political to believe that children are worthy of love and care, and that every child is equal, and that our care shouldn’t stop at what we look like, our family, at our religion, at a border.”
2359
tragicallyohio Mar 23, 2026 +551
This is my first day even knowing who she is but if she is important enough to have an article written about her thoughts on ICE and these are her thoughts then I support her.
551
jinreeko Mar 23, 2026 +409
She's a living goddess to many, many parents
409
Reshar Mar 23, 2026 +87
Ms Rachel is a godsend. She is in the upper echelon of decent media folks. She's right up there with Mr. Rogers and Bob Ross. We need more people like her.
87
FugDuggler Mar 23, 2026 +52
Ya know, i never thought about it that way. Shes set herself up to basically be the Mr. Rogers of these kids lives. Wild. Good on her.
52
MimeTravler Mar 24, 2026 +1
Now we just need her testifying in front of Congress for a new Mr Rodgers moment.
1
tragicallyohio Mar 23, 2026 +116
My kids are a little too old for her now. But they would've probably liked her stuff when they were younger.
116
emz0rmay Mar 23, 2026 +84
She’s incredible. She fights for the rights of ALL children. And she’s extremely smart!
84
alcomaholic-aphone Mar 23, 2026 +11
My nephew and niece love her. Don’t know what her “it” factor is, but she has it with kids.
11
S_O_L_ID Mar 24, 2026 +1
Your grand baby’s will be watching her, I guarantee it. her programming is amazing.
1
theartofrolling Mar 23, 2026 +64
My mate's daughter (2) absolutely adores her. My daughter (also 2) is, for some reason, absolutely f****** terrified of her 😂 I've watched a fair bit of her stuff, she's very talented at what she does, good on her for standing up to this cruel nonsense
64
SpaghettiTape Mar 24, 2026 +1
Have you considered that perhaps your daughter is a Tory?
1
ExternalScholar3472 Mar 23, 2026 +45
And its not like just dumping the children in front of Disney drivel. She is fun and educating. Like the best pre school teacher ever.
45
porscheblack Mar 23, 2026 +26
My daughter was really behind in speech development. We started doing Ms. Rachel videos, working with her. It made a huge improvement. She won't engage with the video as it's going on, but watching a 3 minute section and then pausing it so we can play it out ourselves has been effective. I'm so sick of Ms. Rachel videos but I'm also beyond grateful.
26
LegbeardCatfood Mar 23, 2026 +4
I think the music aspect of her videos is huge. She and her husband really hit the bullseye as far as writing catchy music to grab the kiddo's attentions and then dropping really simple knowledge that you can build on. Godsend for us too with some delayed speech development
4
whoknowsknowone Mar 23, 2026 +13
God in the FLESH
13
FreeLookMode Mar 23, 2026 +59
She is as iconic and impactful as Mr. Roger's was and has the exact same spirit.
59
tragicallyohio Mar 23, 2026 +14
Love her by default then!
14
LurkinMakesMeFeelGud Mar 23, 2026 +62
Her previous news presence came from telling everyone that kids in Gaza are human and don't deserve to be bombed and starved. I share your position. 
62
GodOfDarkLaughter Mar 23, 2026 +25
For that the organization "Stop Antisemitism" named her a finalist for "Antisemite of the year."
25
LRK0-98 Mar 23, 2026 +12
Makes me think she was doing good work then.
12
DarkwingDuckHunt Mar 23, 2026 +43
basically she's the new Mr Rodgers
43
ArticulateRhinoceros Mar 23, 2026 +138
She's out here literally arguing the points Jesus made, while the Pro-Jesus groups are calling her a monster for it...
138
Sun_Shine_Dan Mar 23, 2026 +45
The pro Christian Nationalist groups. Jesus is too woke according to Trump's own flock
45
rbrgr83 Mar 23, 2026 +6
I was told there would be no fact checking.
6
Rxasaurus Mar 23, 2026 +3
"Supply-side Jesus"
3
ThePlanck Mar 23, 2026 +454
It shouldn't be political, but monsters in our society have made it political
454
lettersichiro Mar 23, 2026 +542
No it is political. And the sooner people realize that EVERYTHING is politics, the sooner they can realize that understanding and taking their civic duties seriously really matters And I for one love that miss Rachel is grasping this, and standing for it. We all too often use political like it's some pejorative. Like it should be ran from or like there's shame in acknowledging it. Everything is politics. Republicans get this intuitively and the sooner everyone else realize this the better
542
GeekAesthete Mar 23, 2026 +210
People seem to think "political" means "things that we are ideologically divided over", and that's half the problem. Politics is governance. It's drafting policy. It's how we manage our society. Too often, "shouldn't be political" ultimately means "this isn't something that the government should be involved in," which is great for Republicans when they don't want tax dollars going toward programs to help people. They would love for the well-being of children to not be in the realm of politics, and to not fund education, healthcare, playgrounds, or libraries, and for those things to only be available to those who can afford them. "Shouldn't be political" is also convenient when they don't want something regulated; "this isn't the time for politics" is a common line after mass shootings, when they don't want gun control policies to emerge from it. Taking care of the citizenry only happens through politics, and taking care of children should be included in that.
210
lettersichiro Mar 23, 2026 +54
Yes, and a lot of that is because Republicans act like they own what is consensus. It's being conservative or being political. That false dichotomy has propagandized far too many people into thinking that they should shy away from fighting back against that framing. That we should concede to their capturing of norms and decency or be labeled as political. We need to fight back, or we just keep losing as they chip away.
54
Fumquat Mar 23, 2026 +44
And “that’s too political” can mean, “your scientific consensus is an opinion that we can refute with feelings” or “we don’t want to hear about your experience as an exploited minority”
44
Casual_OCD Mar 23, 2026 +31
"I'm not very political" means "Whenever I expose my disgusting beliefs, I get yelled at"
31
Deer_Mug Mar 23, 2026 +16
Or "I don't care enough to have beliefs." There's a lot of that type, unfortunately. I think both-siders are that type with an excuse they settled on.
16
Casual_OCD Mar 23, 2026 +9
Those people have beliefs, they just know they aren't socially acceptable
9
Deer_Mug Mar 23, 2026 +10
You underestimate our capacity for ignorance.
10
Arcanniel Mar 23, 2026 +23
There are actually plenty of things that should not be regulated by governments, but conservatives around the world insist that they should be. Some examples: - Who can participate in sport competitions. - Who can use public bathrooms. - What romantic relationships can adult people enter into. - What medical procedures can adult people undergo. - What substances are adult people allowed to consume. Conservatives are always the first to invoke the government when personal freedoms are concerned.
23
littlebobbytables9 Mar 23, 2026 +15
Yes, and the question of what the government should and should not regulate is an inherently political question.
15
kia75 Mar 23, 2026 +68
Mr Rogers was political when he dipped his toes into a wading pool with Officer Clemmons, who was black, as pools across the country were shutting down because of integration. This looks like such a non-story today, but it's because people of two different races hanging out together is now a non-issue, and actions like Mr Rogers is what normalized it. Human decency shouldn't be political and instead be the default, but unfortunately, sometimes being a decent human is political, and we should be defending that political activism. How can we tell our kids and toddlers to behave right and do good if we ourselves refuse to behave right and do good?
68
Independent-Bug-9352 Mar 23, 2026 +24
People should look up what choice words the widow of Mr. Rogers had about Trump during his first term no less, lol. Much respect to both. Yet this is the party who thinks empathy is a weakness, and thinks Big Bird and Mr. Rogers are the devil or some bullshit. Talibangelicals in a nutshell.
24
GenDislike Mar 23, 2026 +12
“Empathy is a weakness” should be on all the GOP flags so they know who they’re voting for. We live in a a timeline where voting for/against providing food for children attending public schools is a means towards a career in politics.
12
Okonos Mar 23, 2026 +4
Some evangelical pastors are now talking about empathy being a sin.
4
raouldukesaccomplice Mar 23, 2026 +9
Conservatives were perfectly fine with plopping their kids in front of the TV to watch Mr. Rogers for decades. If he were alive and on the air today, conservatives would accuse him of being a woke Antifa race traitor and the show would probably be getting death threats.
9
SolarDynasty Mar 23, 2026 +21
Benjamin Franklin's words come to mind. "If you can keep it." We got these people because America refused to look in a mirror. We became apathetic to the suffering of others, and developed concepts like good and bad immigrants, the idea of welfare queens and that we were working the hardest. We refused to keep to the political view that our lamp is by the golden door. The promise of the Statue of Liberty. It is political because it always was. And our inaction while the GOP agenda kept going forward was also political. We bought and accepted the idea of inhumane treatment far before Trump. Reconstruction was political. That's why fmr President Johnson stopped it. The languishing dissent of the South after the Civil War opened the door to the continued existence of the other. The concept of lesser than. We need to drop the bread and not buy the circus tickets. If we want to be citizens of a free and independent democracy, we have to be involved in politics and inform ourselves on what is good for the general Public based on universally acclaimed examples rather than Fox News. You don't need a college degree to become politically informed. But you need to care and that lack of care is why we're here today. Voter apathy is the death of a civilized Democratic Nation.
21
TheGreatDay Mar 23, 2026 +10
Everything is political. 100% But the idea that every child is worthy of love and care, that they are equal, and our care should stop at what we look like, our family, at our religion, at a border is like, super political. It is a political idea that conservatives explicitly do not agree with. I don't just mean with their actions or policy positions. I mean literally, ideologically, they stand opposed to the idea that all children are equal and our care for them should go past our families and borders. Conservatives do not believe that all children deserve care and love.
10
Experiment626b Mar 23, 2026 +16
This. Far too many people are apathetic about it and they are more responsible for the mess we are in than maga.
16
PrometheusLiberatus Mar 23, 2026 +28
There is no higher sacred responsibility in this country than the one at the ballot box. And to the devil with every last b****** that tries to take that sacred responsibility away!
28
blazesquall Mar 23, 2026 +12
The ballot box is the floor of civic engagement..
12
NWASicarius Mar 23, 2026 +6
Exactly, and this goes for both sides. Most Americans don't vote. Out of the minority that do vote, most stop their civic engagement after that. I wouldn't be shocked if less than 20 million Americans do more than just vote. This doesn't even mean protesting. Do they volunteer at the homeless shelter? Do they pick up trash if they see it on the ground? Do they organize or attend protests, movements, etc. that they agree with? Americans will only do something when they are left no other option. That's why this admin is so scared atm. They know if they let Americans have a say in the upcoming elections, they will get COOKED.
6
PrometheusLiberatus Mar 23, 2026 +4
Correct, it is the floor from which people spring further responsibilities. But it is 'no higher sacred responsibility' because of how essential that engagement is to making things better for *everyone*. Because effectively every adult should be able to vote without a million guardrails and attempts at disenfranchisement thrown at them. If it wasn't so sacred, bastards wouldn't be doing everything they can to take it away from us.
4
DrDerpberg Mar 23, 2026 +3
I've long resisted calling some things political, because I'm afraid it legitimizes them being up for debate or just a matter of opinion. But I guess I've shifted over time to be more pragmatic and whether I like it or not, some things I'd call basic humanity are "political" and "controversial." The flip side is once you recognize something like that is political, it clarifies to people unsure where they stand what it means to adopt one side's politics or the other. You don't want innocent kids in cages? Then that's where you stand politically. Cut the "I didn't vote for *this*" garbage.
3
zephyrtr Mar 23, 2026 +47
A government can do just about anything, so everything is political. People trying to shut down a conversation by saying "Lets not bring politics into this" is not being serious. They're trying to avoid having an uncomfortable conversation, to be forced to state plainly what they actually believe in — because they know others will say it sounds heinous. Everything is political. It was always this way. It will always be this way. Ms. Rachel is a f****** boss for saying so.
47
hereforfootball303 Mar 23, 2026 +19
Same shit as when they complain that people stop talking to other people over "just politics." Politics are your world view and ethos, arguably the most important factors in who you are as a person. Those people act like it's as if you're saying you can't be friends with a Yankees fan.
19
zephyrtr Mar 23, 2026 +6
Yeah, I'm trying to be as empathetic a person as I can — if only because Trump supporters are not going away, and those folks are on a wide gradient from "Proud Boy" to "I'm deeply confused, but I like when he says no more foreign wars" I don't see anything to be gained by allowing voters to continue this erroneous belief that this isn't a package deal. That you can vote for one part of the platform, and not be on the hook for the other part of the platform. Like ... "We're gonna try to save your car manufacturing job but we're also gonna unwind democracy and enact a Christian Nationalist theocracy" should be a non-starter. Even if we're talking about *your job* — that ought to feel like too high a cost.
6
Jason1143 Mar 23, 2026 +5
In a 2 party system that philosophy runs into problems. You are not guaranteed to have a candidate you completely agree with. Actually you are almost guaranteed not to. So while you need to try and get everything perfect, you are allowed to vote for lesser evil if needed. But it does actually need to be the lesser evil.
5
elconquistador1985 Mar 23, 2026 +15
Literally everything is, and society is full of cowards who pretend that's not the case and they bury their heads in the sand all the time. I used to follow the subreddit "daddit" (basically, a bunch of dads). Roe v Wade was overturned, and it should have been normal on that sub to discuss anxiety over trying to have a child if you live 1000 miles from the closest state where your wife could receive medical care during a miscarriage. And it should be normal to discuss anxiety about sending your kids to a school in a state that prioritizes AR15s over the lives of children. And it should be normal to discuss the fact that some states are requiring or on the verge of requiring religious doctrine to be taught in public school, this intellectually damaging your children. But it isn't, because these cowards pride themselves on burying their heads in the sand and pretending politics doesn't affect them and that you're a bad guy for sullying their apolitical safe space but making them think about "politics". So I left that sub and haven't been back in years. That's not the only community of cowards around. There are a lot of people who think you're the bad guy for putting politics in front of them and making them think about uncomfortable things. They're proud that they "don't watch the news", and you're "killing the vibes".
15
Lucky-Earther Mar 23, 2026 +9
I saw a story in that subreddit a month or two ago about a person who acted as a temporary father for some kids in Minnesota, because their actual parent could not come home over fears about ICE activity. It focused mainly on what the person did while hanging out with the kids, but because it had the overstory of ICE presence in Minnesota, it was "too political". F****** cowardly.
9
CulturalKing5623 Mar 23, 2026 +12
Everything is political, believing children shouldn't be held in cages is an inherently political belief. It shouldn't be a _partisan_ belief, that's the issue we're all having right now. It's a small nitpick but theyre making everything partisan which then pushes people out of "politics" which is why we have so many people tuned out to all of this.
12
Supermite Mar 23, 2026 +15
That’s most definitely the point of her statement.
15
rocksoffjagger Mar 23, 2026 +5
There shouldn't be a political party actively trying to undermine basic human rights for children, but all of these questions will always be political. Just as all things are political. This uncritical notion of what is and isn't "political" in the sense of "what is or isn't a platform of one of the two parties we're offered" serves no one but those in power, and only narrows people's imagination about what other unexamined assumptions of our social order are also artificially imposed political realities.
5
Hesitation-Marx Mar 23, 2026 +9
I genuinely never knew her last name before
9
DegreeDubs Mar 23, 2026 +5
This has been my same argument for universal health care for all children in the USA! How can we feel okay with punishing any child in this country based on who they were born to? Parents become unemployed, parents become disabled, parents die. How can we not support the health and well-being of every American child? Ms. Rachel gets it.
5
FantasticBicycle37 Mar 23, 2026 +2335
Tonight we ride for Ms Rachel!
2335
s_double_c Mar 23, 2026 +436
That’s what I’m sayin. Never would’ve thought Ms. Rachel would emerge as our dark horse!
436
Sufficient_Candy1642 Mar 23, 2026 +347
She has been fighting for the last two and half years for the children of Gaza. Some notorious people even nominated her for Antisemite of the year 2025 to stop her voice for the children of Gaza. Then again, when USA hit Iranian school, she raised her voice again only to be ridiculed by the Zionists. SHE IS a HERO. We need to make sure that nobody can intimidates and silences her voice ever.
347
RabbiTheHellcat Mar 23, 2026 +99
what does advocating for children have to do with hating jews? lmfao
99
thealmightyzfactor Mar 23, 2026 +109
Nothing in a sane world, but it benefits the nutcakes currently in charge of Israel and the USA to conflate the two
109
TooGoodatEverything Mar 23, 2026 +92
I mean that's the absurdity, right? She's showing the children of Gaza humanity and they think that's anti-Semitic. Just genuinely a brain disease. lmao
92
lisa_lionheart84 Mar 23, 2026 +30
I am a huge Ms. Rachel stan. My 2-year-old is obsessed with her and I love that woman. Some of the backlash to her has to do with the fact that she or someone working for her accidentally liked a comment on Instagram that said "free America from the Jews." When it was brought to her attention, she deleted the comment and posted a true apology in which she was clearly devastated: [https://www.instagram.com/reels/DTybZnkAQVt/](https://www.instagram.com/reels/DTybZnkAQVt/) It hasn't changed how I feel about her--and I'm from a Jewish family and send my daughter to a Jewish daycare--but that mistake definitely didn't help things.
30
Nukesnipe Mar 23, 2026 +13
These people equate not supporting Israel 100% to being a nazi.
13
tired-of-the-shit Mar 24, 2026 +1
People want to frame those that support Palestinians and a ceasefire as anti semite. If you criticize the government of isreal those same people will call you anti semitic.i think It’s a propaganda tactic
1
Patman350 Mar 23, 2026 +230
My 11-month old daughter had heart surgery, and in recovery the only thing that gave her comfort was Ms. Rachel. It was like magic. This isn't hyperbole or a superlative. I would go to war for Ms. Rachel.
230
duckinradar Mar 23, 2026 +64
I work in a pediatric hospital. I don't have kids, and the kids in my life at now teenagers, so Ms Rachel wasn't on my map prior to a few years ago. She's magic.
64
ThunderDoom1001 Mar 23, 2026 +34
Same here. 4 kids, and every single one of them has learned so much from Ms Rachel. Shes an angel in this house and I'll always stick up for her.
34
caligaris_cabinet Mar 23, 2026 +11
2 kids. They love Miss Rachel and I love they have such a positive influence on the media they consume.
11
Hesitation-Marx Mar 23, 2026 +17
I hope she’s doing better. My son is 22 and I would go to war for Ms Rachel as well, because she seems like a decent person who just sees kids and thinks “PROTECT and LOVE”, and that’s someone who deserves to be cherished.
17
politiscientist Mar 23, 2026 +41
You have my sword!
41
PlanetOfThePancakes Mar 23, 2026 +22
And my axe
22
Henshin-hero Mar 23, 2026 +34
And my pink shirt
34
Nacktherr Mar 23, 2026 +24
When we ride, we wear pink!
24
Thimascus Mar 23, 2026 +18
Pink is the most brave of colors. It's brave to wear pink
18
systemdatenmuell Mar 23, 2026 +10
And my bath tub duckie
10
cbm984 Mar 23, 2026 +13
And my overalls!
13
Kdot32 Mar 23, 2026 +17
The children will revolt for Ms. Rachel. I’ve seen her impact with my goddaughter
17
tinysydneh Mar 23, 2026 +17
I have heard absolutely nothing even a little negative about her, and the positive things are the same kinds of positive things I heard about Fred Rogers growing up.
17
megthegreatone Mar 23, 2026 +9
My 2-year-old is just starting to outgrow Ms. Rachel and it is actually breaking my heart a bit. She is an absolute treasure
9
Contende311 Mar 23, 2026 +6
Mine is back into her after a couple months of helper cars. We're watching her right this moment.
6
eightdx Mar 23, 2026 +9
Maybe Ms. Rachel is out Eowyn. No man could slay the Witch King, after all
9
ross571 Mar 23, 2026 +6
Ride now! Ride now! Death!
6
Sad_Locksmith_2904 Mar 23, 2026 +793
I don’t watch her stuff, as I’m not a toddler, but she seems like a great person.
793
southernfirefly13 Mar 23, 2026 +387
Everything I hear and see of her, she reminds me so much of Mr. Rogers
387
jeo123 Mar 23, 2026 +226
Kinda. Her heart is in the right place. She's a bit more of "Mr. Rogers" for the tablet generation of toddlers though. She doesn't get into the long, slow conversation discussing big people topics in little people terms though. Half her content is just songs to keep kids distracted. She's one of the better people to put on for your kids in my opinion, but Mr. Rogers was in a league of his own that I don't think you can compare to. She's still great though.
226
Dr_Hannibal_Lecter Mar 23, 2026 +197
I agree Mr Rogers is in a league of his own. But he also was aiming at an older cohort. Her formatting is aimed at young toddlers. His was aimed at school aged children. Her songs are not designed to distract, but to my literally teach early verbal and even preverbal communication.
197
geoffbowman Mar 23, 2026 +56
Also a big part of Mr. Rogers vision for his show was to be a calm contrast to the kids programming of the time ('68 was when the show started). Shows aimed at kids in the 60s-70s were hyperactive and obnoxious full of slapstick and silliness and usually sponsored by some product that was bad for kids like sugary cereal, fast food, candy, etc. They were basically long commercials that you could distract your kid with while you did other things. Mr. Rogers wanted a show that was more sincere and selling ideas like how to know what feelings you're feeling, being kind to your neighbors, and healthy self-esteem/self-worth. His quiet and calm was intrinsic to his personal brand because his goal for the show required it and he got to be on public television and not beholden to any sponsors. Ms. Rachel is working in a different time, on a different platform, with different goals.
56
caligaris_cabinet Mar 23, 2026 +24
You could argue she’s pushing against the rise of AI slop in kids programming. Different for but the same cause.
24
Chezzica Mar 23, 2026 +7
There's an argument to be made that toddlers shouldn't be watching anything on screens - yes they can learn from her songs, but they would learn much better with a present adult singing those songs to them in person. However we can't all be present adults all the time, and if you're going to give your toddler screen time then she's a good choice (I stand firm that babies/infants should not be placed in front of screens, no matter how much they like it and how awesome the person on screen is)
7
Fearless_Sorbet_1434 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Her show made a big difference for my speech delayed toddler, and noticeably impacted her catching up to where she should have been.
1
CheesypoofExtreme Mar 23, 2026 +60
Cocomelon is songs just to distract kids. Ms. Rachel actually uses studied techniques to help with many areas of development for kid 18 months + or so. I fully agree she doesn't talk about big topics in detail, but that's not exactly the point of her content. She teaches language skills, autonomy, colors, counting, etc. Our daughter has had a speech delay, and Ms. Rachel really helped us learn techniques to use for improving her enunciation. Daniel Tiger and Mr. Rogers should be required programming for all new parents, though. I've learned so much about how to speak to our daughter from those shows.
60
NWASicarius Mar 23, 2026 +18
PBS kids is full of great shows for the whole family. If you want your kid to learn about 'big people' problems in a healthy and productive way, utilize PBS kids. Just make sure you are being an active parent at times. Ask your kids questions when a problem arises in the show. 'What would you do if you were X?' Let them answer, and then you can give your response as to what you would do. For most kids, they will now want to copy mom/dad and what they would do in that situation. It's kind of a healthy way to let your kid feel like they are independent while also tricking them into thinking about things the 'right' way. Right meaning what you would hope your kids do if a certain situation arises. There's no definitive answer. It differs parent to parent.
18
PuffPuffFayeFaye Mar 23, 2026 +34
An adult I can go watch Mr Rogers and learn things without feeling like they’re watching a kid show at all.
34
LouisWinthorpeIII Mar 23, 2026 +13
I'd like to add that the way they shoot the show in tight it makes it good for little kids learning to speak. The focus of the show is supposed to be language development, younger intended audience than Mr. Rogers was.
13
FrostyD7 Mar 23, 2026 +10
It's definitely for younger ages. Mr. Rogers wasn't peak content for a drooling baby. There's a reason Ms. Rachel videos prominently feature the runtime in the thumbnail, they are "keep baby distracted for x minutes" videos.
10
swollencornholio Mar 23, 2026 +4
I don't really think it's a tablet generation thing, her content is definitely geared towards younger babies/toddlers than Mr Rogers audience. There wasn't really content for babies/toddlers prior to youtube.
4
ArticulateRhinoceros Mar 23, 2026 +7
Her main focus is on teaching speaking, as her channel grew out of a desire to help her own child who was struggling to meet speech milestones.
7
AnalBumCovers Mar 23, 2026 +6
Another person FOX news once called evil
6
caligaris_cabinet Mar 23, 2026 +7
Which is how you know they’re good
7
PoochMaGooch Mar 23, 2026 +41
Thank you for the clarification. A toddler would be far too young to be a sad locksmith.
41
Faux-Foe Mar 23, 2026 +39
I would think every toddler trapped behind a baby gate is a sad locksmith.
39
gaslacktus Mar 23, 2026 +4
Childproofing is an arms race against a child's dexterity and cognitive development, every toddler is an eager locksmith.
4
Supermite Mar 23, 2026 +3
I’ve never met a toddler that was stopped by a baby gate.
3
Wumaduce Mar 23, 2026 +10
I can't see any world where a toddler wouldn't be a sad locksmith. They're probably not gonna keep that job long.
10
HoightyToighty Mar 23, 2026 +7
Their talents lie more in the deconstruction line of work
7
Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mike Mar 23, 2026 +16
She is a great person Which is why maga hates her so much
16
DAFUQisaLOMMY Mar 23, 2026 +14
Since I have a toddler, I watch her stuff, and she is. My dude loves her, the songs, the lessons... just everything. She's committed to helping children, helping them learn and grow, and as a parent it helps a lot to have that figure that they're look at. She's this generation's Mr Rogers, and it's a nice reprieve from the rest of the world.
14
we_are_sex_bobomb Mar 23, 2026 +3
As much as I admire her meeting this moment, I am also livid that these battles are being fought with people like her - educators with a calling to child development - forced to the front lines. This shouldn’t even be a battle that she has to fight. It’s so wrong that we even have to debate what is going on here. And it’s a fundamental injustice that she is being pulled into a ridiculous culture war just for taking the bold stance that locking up kids in concentration camps is bad, actually. The shame I feel for this country and how things have fallen so far, so fast, is simply unbearable. What do we have to do to make this stop?
3
Reddit_guard Mar 23, 2026 +292
Ms. Rachel deserves every bit of fame and success she has earned.
292
Unusual-State1827 Mar 23, 2026 +162
>Per NBC News: “Children have complained of limited education, lights that never turn off and moldy food” at Dilley. Amid the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown, “more than 2,300 children” have been put into detention with their parents, “with the overwhelming majority held at Dilley, according to figures provided by court-appointed monitors. Many have been held for several weeks or months.” >Accurso recently had a video call with 9-year-old Deiver Henao Jimenez, who was detained at Dilley along with his parents in early March. It was her second video call with a detained child, the first being with a 5-year-old named Gael. >Speaking to NBC News, Accurso said: “It was unbelievably surreal to see this sweet little face and feel like I was on a call with somebody who’s in jail. It broke me, and it was something I never thought I’d encounter in life… We’re trying to get a child out of a jail to do a spelling bee. I just never thought those words would go together.” >Accurso is now working with lawyers and immigration activists “to close Dilley and make sure that kids and their parents are back in their communities where they belong.” >“I am political,” Accurso told the news outlet. “It’s political to believe that children are worthy of love and care, and that every child is equal, and that our care shouldn’t stop at what we look like, our family, at our religion, at a border.”
162
GazeboHunter Mar 23, 2026 +184
If this is the face we rally behind I’m all in 🫡
184
PM_me_Henrika Mar 23, 2026 +8
She doesn’t look like a nazi barbie. Conservative hates that.
8
radicalelation Mar 23, 2026 +125
Good move to simply own it to get right to the point that matters. Whether or not she's political takes away from her cause, which isn't even about her specifically. She's not only seemingly incredibly active in this, but really f****** good at it.
125
RuggedAmerican Mar 23, 2026 +47
Not even sure why this line of thinking even has a veneer of credibility. "Stop making my policy of child abduction political!" If that is all you need to ignore Ms. Rachel's position, you're too far-gone.
47
MusicalDingus Mar 23, 2026 +10
These are the same people who support a TV personality like Trump, but will tell Ms Rachel she's just a children's show host and shouldn't try to be political.
10
albatrossSKY Mar 23, 2026 +49
Imagine being so cartoonishly evil that you managed to radicalize the woman who teaches toddlers how to point to their nose. If youre on the opposite side of Ms Rachel and Mr Rogers, you really need to sit down and rethink every life choice that led you to this point.
49
zeronationarmy Mar 23, 2026 +65
Godspeed, Ms. Rachel. I admire her so much for not backing down.
65
-wnr- Mar 23, 2026 +76
"It's not political" applies to a lot of things, but nowadays I mostly see it invoked by people who want to shut down conversations about the heinous, obviously political shit they support.
76
linktothe Mar 23, 2026 +53
I don't want to come off as snarky for this one, but *what* is not political? The phrase was always invoked by people that don't want to talk about heinous anti-human views or the views of abusers they support.
53
LoreleiAlbrecht Mar 23, 2026 +45
I mostly hear this in gaming circles. The amount of MAGA people that played the metal gear games with their eyes closed will never not annoy me that and the people who unironically listen to rage against the machine
45
Tokzillu Mar 23, 2026 +35
Fallout is another game series that right wingers love to play and somehow miss all the messaging lol.
35
LoreleiAlbrecht Mar 23, 2026 +18
Which confuses the f*** outta me. Do they just see the 50's style iconography and just have their eyes glaze over?
18
guamisc Mar 23, 2026 +17
These are the people that watched the Colbert Report and didn't recognize it was satire.
17
Broken-Digital-Clock Mar 23, 2026 +13
These are the types of people that think Homelander is a good guy. "Handsome strong man with flag cape = good"
13
LoreleiAlbrecht Mar 23, 2026 +8
Ya know I'm gonna be honest might makes right mentality is something I genuinely can't understand.
8
Tokzillu Mar 23, 2026 +16
There seems to be a lot of them that don't register the satire. So they see this comical 1950s style American exceptionalism, but they don't understand that it's poking fun at it so they seem to think that the games are all *'Murica, F*** Yeah* and they roll with that. Some of them straight up deluded themselves into thinking it's some kind of Anti-Communism message somehow.
16
icouldntdecide Mar 23, 2026 +5
When I played Fallout 3 and fought against Liberty Prime, the anti-communist pro-freedom America F*** yeah voice lines had me rolling - but I knew even then that it was supposed to be overtly patriotic because it was part of the ethos that lead to America's downfall. My point being, a lot of people enjoyed stuff like Liberty Prime as badass and awesome *at face value*
5
umchoyka Mar 23, 2026 +5
> somehow I mean, we know how
5
cafink Mar 23, 2026 +7
The ability to be uninterested in politics is itself a privilege, afforded to those who won't be hurt by regressive public policy. Holding such a position is just a way of tacitly supporting the status quo, which is to say that it is an inherently conservative view.
7
bluecollarclassicist Mar 23, 2026 +28
“The children are always ours, every single one of them, all over the globe; and I am beginning to suspect that whoever is incapable of recognizing this may be incapable of morality.” ― James Baldwin
28
T8ert0t Mar 23, 2026 +3
Jimmy B always took it to the goal.
3
GPFlag_Guy1 Mar 23, 2026 +11
Ms. Rachel is the Millennial Mr. Rogers.
11
tekani11 Mar 23, 2026 +40
Hop little bunny!
40
jnicoline Mar 23, 2026 +8
Hop hop hop!
8
Made_Human_Music Mar 23, 2026 +10
It’s sad how many things these monsters have made political. Just being a kind, decent person is somehow political now The right, and MAGAts in particular, have really fucked the world up with their pathetic culture war
10
metallee98 Mar 23, 2026 +47
Unfortunately being a good person is political these days.
47
Unusual-State1827 Mar 23, 2026 +30
They removed my post from UpliftingNews subreddit. See it on my profile. I have no idea why. That's why I posted it here. How is it that we are seeing such acts of empathy and compassion as political?
30
5pin05auru5 Mar 23, 2026 +5
Nothing wrong with being political. It's an intrinsic part of being human, like breathing, eating and bad fashion choices.
5
13thmurder Mar 24, 2026 +1
Preschool teacher doesn't think toddlers should go to prison. Damn, so controversial.
1
Schiffy94 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Or be killed in war. How evil of her.
1
TheEPGFiles Mar 23, 2026 +16
People demonizing Ms. Rachel are human scum.
16
Andovars_Ghost Mar 23, 2026 +41
Like I said in another post, she’s the modern Mister Rogers with all the honor that entails.
41
tresharley Mar 23, 2026 +7
I 100% agree!
7
FunkyPlunkett Mar 23, 2026 +21
Yo either live long enough to watch Ms. Rachel or die for Ms.Rachel. My child has the confidence to speak because of her. I would watch the world burn if it meant Rachel is ok.
21
amus Mar 23, 2026 +7
>‘It’s Political to Believe Every Child Is Equal’ Evidently. You would have thought that was something we all could agree on, but here we are
7
AgitatedStranger9698 Mar 23, 2026 +4
How quickly would the US military respond if any country started rounding up US citizen children, separating them from parents, then shipping them wherever? I don't understand how this is tolerated because it has to "hurt".
4
RosetteNewcomb Mar 23, 2026 +5
Honestly in times like these if you don't take a political stance it is a tacit endorsement of the current status quo. Which in itself is damning.
5
The_Perezident Mar 23, 2026 +19
Caillou would never
19
everettescott Mar 23, 2026 +10
*whines in caillou*
10
cwk415 Mar 23, 2026 +17
I have no idea who this person is, but I like her! Go get 'em girl!!
17
kingsumo_1 Mar 23, 2026 +29
Originally, she did child focused content for preschoolers. Learning to read, singing, that sort of thing. My little one loved watching her stuff. Then she made a very polarizing comment that we shouldn't be harming or killing kids, and the right got all up in arms over it. Since then, she's become more vocal and fighting for stuff like this (the linked video).
29
tinysydneh Mar 23, 2026 +14
I think that was the moment where she realized that just trying to be neutral wasn't going to help anyone. She tried it, she said something that any sane person should have been able to agree with, and they lost their damn minds. Even the most careful, most neutrally stated *good* things trigger their defenses, and that says a lot about how much you can trust them.
14
kingsumo_1 Mar 23, 2026 +7
These are the same type of people that called Mr. Rogers evil. But yeah, it was (Ms. Rachel's comment) really bland at the time, and they still viewed it as an attack. Glad she didn't back down though. She's got a pretty decent platform, and it's nice to see her using it for good.
7
tinysydneh Mar 23, 2026 +3
Everything I've seen and heard about her suggest that she is absolutely the kind to use her platform for good.
3
cwk415 Mar 23, 2026 +10
Thanks for the background. Good on her! 
10
PlanetOfThePancakes Mar 23, 2026 +22
Life is political. It shouldn’t be, but when a large portion of the population thinks some people are inherently inferior and less deserving of basic human rights, then their very existence becomes political. Human rights should be a no brainer.
22
luamercure Mar 23, 2026 +15
Insane that something like "All children deserve human rights" is indeed a f****** political and "controversial" statement now.
15
autotelica Mar 23, 2026 +9
People who say they aren't political might as well be saying they don't care about what happens to themselves or their loved ones. Our lives are shaped by policies and laws and a million decisions that are made by people with varying levels of power. People who say they don't care about politics are embarrassing, pathetic human beings.
9
theavatare Mar 23, 2026 +5
I’m actually super cool with her being out president if the new requirements is that they been on tv
5
plexust Mar 23, 2026 +4
Everything is political, from your coffee in the morning, your commute to-and-from work, the TV you watch at night, and yes—whether you think it's good to detain children in a concentration camp. People who like to think otherwise have probably not thought deeply enough about their own circumstances.
4
FDTFACTTWNY Mar 23, 2026 +5
If you haven't seen the drone footage it is scary. Hundreds of children detained, everyone dressed in colored jackets and kids waving at the drone.
5
OpticalPrime35 Mar 23, 2026 +5
The fact that they even DETAIN children like animals is beyond the pale. It's hard to imagine a more fucked up scenario than that. Helpless kids being detained by ICE inside a building with cages and barred windows after they have been ripped away from their parents and tossed in like trash. It's disgusting and I will never respect another Republican again until they completely denounce this whole practice and work for awhile to correct it. What's really crazy though is they support it. So f*** them
5
AHugeHildaFan Mar 23, 2026 +5
That's not even mentioning the reports of sexual assault at ICE detention facilities. ICE agents assaulting women and children
5
mowotlarx Mar 23, 2026 +1
Mr. Rogers testified in front of Congress. Everything is political. Everything we do is funded at least partially by the governments we elect. Everyone has a responsibility to step up where they can.
1
ClassicHando Mar 24, 2026 +1
"Stop hurting people" shouldn't be a political statement Been saying that for awhile now. Keep on Ms Rachel
1
eightdx Mar 23, 2026 +5
They complain about this shit being political because they want to believe that "children in camps" isn't political. Because that would absolve them of being f****** monsters.
5
mrcsjmswltn Mar 23, 2026 +5
I hate when people tell me they “aren’t political”… it’s so childish. Cool let other people make decisions for you.
5
Independent-Bug-9352 Mar 23, 2026 +5
I'd genuinely vote for Ms. Rachel as president. I prioritize moral courage above pretty much anything else at this point. I trust she'd be capable of picking knowledgeable expert advisors in any subject area, and to make executive decisions in mind on behalf of all people.
5
Useless Mar 23, 2026 +3
This is a problem intrinsic to mass detainment with the intent to deport. Either you separate the children from their detained parents, which is abhorrent or you detain children along with their parents which is abhorrent.
3
haliblix Mar 23, 2026 +4
I shouldn’t have to explain to people why locking up children in cages or government sponsored kidnapping of their parents is evil at work. I loathe the fact that common decency is political and “woke” now.
4
IrrelevantLeprechaun Mar 23, 2026 +4
"we love Ms. Rachel, we will ride to war for her!" *Ms. Rachel asks people to organize to help stop fascism* "Hey now whoa now, you're over stepping here, I don't have time for that, settle down." Is what I imagine will happen.
4
ShleepsWithBooks Mar 23, 2026 +4
F*** yes Ms. Rachel!!!
4
crushinglyreal Mar 23, 2026 +4
One of the biggest mistakes was to let people believe there is any apolitical belief. At this point it’s just become an excuse not to engage.
4
highgroundservitude Mar 23, 2026 +4
It's kind of impossible to be an educator and non-political. The first thing I heard from my university lecturer's mouth was "every teacher is politically active. to educate is to be political"
4
CrayZonday Mar 24, 2026 +1
It’s impossible to be apolitical period. Being “apolitical” is an endorsement of the status quo.
1
Sandman4501 Mar 24, 2026 +1
F*** yeah, I stand with Miss Rachel and happy kids who aren’t being attacked by ice. Why is this a thing, America!?
1
ChippedHamSammich Mar 24, 2026 +1
Imagine being against anything this woman says and still thinking you’re Christian.
1
icantsppell Mar 23, 2026 +9
Of course, she’s as close to Mr. Rodgers as we’ll probably ever see today. Good on her.
9
hansofoundation Mar 23, 2026 +3
Everything and everyone not living under a rock is political. It's not controversial, it's just facts.
3
ihatevicvanlier Mar 23, 2026 +3
As if helping me raise a toddler that loves to learn wasn’t enough of a reason to stan Ms. Rachel. (and Mr. Aron, of course)
3
kent_eh Mar 23, 2026 +3
>“It’s political to believe that children are worthy of love and care, and that every child is equal, and that our care shouldn’t stop at what we look like, our family, at our religion, at a border.” In a sane and just world, that should never have to be considered to be a "political statement".
3
Author_A_McGrath Mar 23, 2026 +3
This wasn't always a political stance, but modern conservatives have chosen to make it one.
3
pak_sajat Mar 23, 2026 +3
It’s comments like this that make me okay with how obsessed my toddler is with her show.
3
ShedMontgomery Mar 23, 2026 +3
Ms. Rachel is proudly carrying a torch lit by Fred Rogers: children's programming that wants to build robust, thoughtful, and kind humans. Would Fred be doing the same if he were alive today? Tough to say. He was a Republican, but I can't imagine him being silent about children sleeping in cages or growing up under the threat of the genocidal Israeli regime.
3
DuneSpoon Mar 23, 2026 +3
Related: [Lindsay Ellis's video](https://youtu.be/QwpanShgOp4) from a few months ago about Ms. Rachel being politicized for having empathy for children is a great video essay.
3
Velvetrose-2 Mar 23, 2026 +3
Empathy is a Left leaning emotion
3
Nocturnes_echo Mar 23, 2026 +3
If something doesn't happen, this is going to be the next group of Epstein Island children
3
brasswirebrush Mar 23, 2026 +3
Good for you Ms Rachel. If Mr. Rogers was alive and doing children's television today, he also would have been labelled "political".
3
SinglecoilsFTW Mar 23, 2026 +3
i don't think people who talk about destroying Palestine, Venezuela, Iran, or Cuba can hear how evil they sound. People are too comfortable indiscriminately attacking civilians.
3
KevinJCarroll Mar 23, 2026 +3
Reminder that the US is one of the few countries in the world not to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
3
Blurryneck Mar 23, 2026 +11
If you can afford to do it, and support her, you should consider streaming her show for the next little bit. An increase in viewers will both reward her financially and reinforce that she is doing the right thing.
11
Colonel_Gentleman Mar 23, 2026 +8
One side says kids shouldn't be stuck in prison and fed worm-ridden food, and the other says they're radicalized by basic decency.
8
Green-Collection-968 Mar 23, 2026 +7
Yeah we've reached the point of our history that not wanting children born in this country in concentration camps is political folks.
7
← Back to Board