She will say, like MTG, that anti war is MAGA America first and this war is not MAGA.
210
seeker4482Mar 26, 2026
+69
has Magic the Greene even directly criticized Trump yet? a lot of Trumpists are heavy into "good tsars bad boyars / if the Fuhrer only knew" type thinking.
69
LilWoadieMar 26, 2026
+29
This is how I always read her name in my head. Glad to know I’m not alone.
29
WhatAcheHuntMar 26, 2026
+20
"If the Fuhrer only knew" is basically the theme of the con sub at the moment. Lots of people blaming his advisers. Very few directly blaming Trump. Plenty of the 4D chess folk about which is hilarious because I highly doubt trump even knows how to play 2D/3D chess. Unless of course they mean that he is playing his own game and making up the rules as he goes, which would actually answer a lot of my questions.
20
TheAngryGoatMar 27, 2026
+16
"If only Donald Trump knew what Donald Trump was doing right now, Donald Trump would be very angry with Donald Trump's actions!"
16
epilepticninjaMar 26, 2026
+5
I would bet money he has no idea how to play chess. I'd be surprised if he even knew the rules of checkers.
5
mantis_tobaggan-mdMar 26, 2026
+1
I doubt he knows the rules to go fish, there is no way he knows how to play chess.
1
PockydoMar 27, 2026
+2
There's a book of interviews with a few everyday normal German from the 50s called They thought they were free
>If the Fuhrer only knew
Essentially sums up like 90% of kt
2
wahoozermanMar 27, 2026
+3
"He's not malicious he's just incompetent!" Is their favorite defence.
3
EaglepursuitMar 26, 2026
+5
Surprisingly, yes. But like with Mace, I am deeply skeptical about the sincerity of her heelturn in the cult of personality
5
seeker4482Mar 26, 2026
+1
i agree
1
Top-Bend-7192Mar 27, 2026
+1
Yeah she has called him out multiple times lately, here's one
https://x.com/FmrRepMTG/status/2029665925062881522
If you dont wanna click on X
https://www.axios.com/2026/03/06/tucker-carlson-2028-president-bid-trump-mtg
1
Prestigious-Host8977Mar 26, 2026
+1
She has been pretty critical of Trump lately, saying he betrayed MAGA, etc.
1
seeker4482Mar 27, 2026
+1
that surprises me, i haven't really been following what she's been doing
1
Prestigious-Host8977Mar 27, 2026
+1
Yeah, I don't know her motives, but when Trump called her Marjorie Traitor Green and sucked his mions on her over Epstein, she broke from him.
1
ElderSmackJackMar 26, 2026
Yes
0
KinkyPaddlingMar 26, 2026
+1
They’d probably be see as correct by the base if Trump wasn’t spewing his vitriol constantly.
1
duckinradarMar 27, 2026
+1
I mean… if they would stick to a any f****** script at all, it would be less atrociously awful than it is currently
1
pagesid3Mar 26, 2026
+32
One tweet from dear leader calling her an ugly b**** and asking the maga base to harass her and she will fall in line
32
Root-magicMar 26, 2026
+24
People are genuinely angry about this war, her constituents don’t want to lose their children to another pointless war
24
Sweettooth4532Mar 26, 2026
+11
I wish there was something congress could do to stop him…
11
SurveyHandMar 26, 2026
+8
You guys still have a congress?
8
mantis_tobaggan-mdMar 26, 2026
+3
That’s debatable
3
Root-magicMar 26, 2026
+2
Not this congress, the GOPers have their butts permanently raised towards Donald
2
Murakami_YseraMar 27, 2026
+1
Yeah, she's running for governor now so she has to pretend to care a little, I suppose.
1
smegdawgMar 26, 2026
+23
When she actually has to vote...
[March 6th War Powers Resolution Vote](https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/INTERACTIVE-US-House-backs-trump-vote-Iran-1772786880.png?quality=80)
20 days ago she voted AGAINST a war powers resolution that would have halted President Donald Trump’s war on Iran and required congressional authorisation for any further attacks.
23
TetracropolisMar 26, 2026
+6
Yeah, she opposes boots on the ground.
6
SminahinMar 26, 2026
+9
That assumes she isn't still. Words are c**** and everyone's trying to build their brand with performative outrage entirely out of sync with their actions for their whole lives.
9
edelweiss_pirates_noMar 26, 2026
+7
She is a sociopath.
Every breath is only focused on herself.
7
RamBamBooeyMar 26, 2026
+6
Why isn't this a good thing? MAGA being a cult is bad. Shouldn't cracks in the cult be good?
You can support Nancy Mace's position without giving her an electoral endorsement.
6
liptickletaffyMar 26, 2026
+2
This is a constant. Saw it with Massie too. I don't agree with her politics and it seems she may have mental health issues, but she voted to release the Epstein Files and that took real courage politics or no.
2
Brix106Mar 26, 2026
+1
Voted against war powers act so your point is moot.
1
NoDaddyNotTheBelt25Mar 26, 2026
+5
As soon as she loses her governor bid. She’s desperately playing sane in the middle right now.
5
SwissChzMcGeezMar 26, 2026
+4
Any time her vote matters.
4
caserockMar 26, 2026
+1
Her statement is just an advertisement saying "I need more money for this vote"
1
shfivenMar 26, 2026
+1
My comment was going to be "awesome! She's still nuts."
1
chunkah69Mar 26, 2026
+1
Once Trump calls her and tells her to stop. About 10 mins from now
1
MyheelcatMar 27, 2026
+1
When the polls swing the other way
1
nuckleMar 27, 2026
+1
I give her a week before she asks someone during a congressional hearing to define a woman.
1
Hayes4prezMar 27, 2026
+1
Until there is a terrorist attack.
[Kash Patel gutted FBI counterintelligence team tasked with tracking Iranian threats days before US strikes, sources say](https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/03/politics/patel-fbi-national-security-division-firings-iran)
1
SuperNovaSniperMar 27, 2026
+1
As soon as the topic doesn’t personally affect her.
1
AaronBasedGodgersMar 27, 2026
+1
When hating trans people becomes the hot topic again
1
MistrblankMar 26, 2026
The first time they vote on it.
0
RedsoxmacMar 26, 2026
When the check clears
0
PeterTheWolf76Mar 26, 2026
+158
Shes running for SC governor. This political grandstanding.
158
starkraverMar 26, 2026
+25
Maybe, but I welcome her to the limited coalition of anti-war politicians. We move forward with those with whom we can come along on issues where we think there is space to make progress. Purity tests for bipartisan issue-based collations are toxic.
25
atreidesletoIIMar 26, 2026
+11
I really really want to disagree because she sucks but you are right and we need to get back to being able to have actual options separate from youre political sports team....and that is basically what is become at this point
11
PsychLegalMindMar 26, 2026
+80
First woman to graduate from the Citadel's Corps of Cadets program and use to be a supporter of Ron Paul \[back in the day\] during his presidential run. She knows, this war is not a winning hand for her political advancement.
80
Johannes_PMar 27, 2026
+5
Wasn't Ron Paul an isolationist opposed to IRaq War?
5
gswblu3-1leadMar 27, 2026
+7
He did oppose the war in Iraq. He’s most known for his distrust of the FED and his calls to audit the reserve.
7
PsychLegalMindMar 27, 2026
+5
Ron Paul got it right.
5
OfficerBarbierMar 27, 2026
+1
Yeah, thanks to her dad the general who was commandant of the corps
1
crimedog58Mar 27, 2026
+1
Nepo baby Nancy
1
sugarlessdeathbearMar 26, 2026
+35
We are not on the same side, we just happen to agree on this one thing.
35
JaronJervisMar 26, 2026
+194
Iran war bad, Protecting pedos Good - Nancy Mace
194
Sad_Locksmith_2904Mar 26, 2026
+70
Uh, wasn’t she one of the 4 Republicans to push for the Epstein files release? (Her, Massie, Greene and Boebert)
70
JaronJervisMar 26, 2026
+70
and Trump held back millions of files, what did Nancy say about that?
3 weeks ago [Nancy Mace voted to keep the attacks on Iran going without congressional approval, ](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/5/us-house-narrowly-rejects-resolution-to-end-trumps-iran-war)along with most other REPUBS .
Bombing schools and civilians and hospitals Good, Boots on the ground to do it Bad- Nancy Mace
70
irespondwithmyfaceMar 26, 2026
+21
Yes she's for endless bombing but against boots on the ground. Which honestly, the way establishment Democrats talk, they often agree with endless bombing just "the right way." (Whatever that means.)
21
t0matit0Mar 26, 2026
+19
She says shit to the cameras then votes party line
19
razz-boyMar 26, 2026
+18
She was one of 4 republicans to sign the Epstein files discharge petition, like the person you replied to said
https://clerk.house.gov/DischargePetition/2025090209
18
JaronJervisMar 26, 2026
+2
And she'll be the 1st to tell you that she doesn't think Trump is a pedo. It is performative, she is a MAGA, it's all they know.
2
razz-boyMar 26, 2026
+9
Maybe, but that doesn’t change the fact that she did the right thing in this one instance when she didn’t have to. I can appreciate that regardless of what the motivations were
9
JaronJervisMar 26, 2026
-6
how can you appreciate a MAGA? This GOP congress lets Trump do whatever he wants, and agrees with his illegal actions 99% of the time. But she takes this one face saving stance, and that deserves your appreciation?
This is an illegal war, when Mace calls it that, and Trump the most corrupt POS in the history of the presidency, and resigns , never to show her face in politics again, I'll show my appreciation to her.
-6
razz-boyMar 26, 2026
+7
You didn’t read my comment or chose to interpret it differently. That’s fine
7
Loud_Lavishness_8266Mar 26, 2026
-4
Performative.
-4
Federal_Drummer7105Mar 26, 2026
+7
Perhaps. But at least she did it. I have the same feelings for her as for Marjorie Taylor Green:
* If she does the right thing, performative or not, I'll take it.
* She's still not invited to my house or the BBQ.
* Every time she opens her mouth to talk smack about gay people - f*** her.
7
razz-boyMar 26, 2026
+13
The government would not have been forced to release any Epstein files if she didn’t sign it. She’s awful, but you don’t need to be dishonest
13
ETNevadaMar 26, 2026
+1
She's big on UFO disclosure too. She basically attaches herself to anything that will get camera time no matter what she truly believes (or ultimately votes for).
1
Snoo9648Mar 26, 2026
+2
Until she actually calls out trump for not releasing them, she is actively protecting pedophiles.
2
pheakelmattersMar 26, 2026
+11
I have to inspect your genitals before I can upvote your comment.
11
letskillbradMar 26, 2026
+1
Still waiting for Nathan Mace to show us her hog
1
ArrowNut7Mar 27, 2026
+1
Hottest transwoman I’ve seen in congress yet. How many are secretly out there?
1
twitterfluechtlingMar 26, 2026
+1
> Iran war bad
Because Trump got it wrong: You don't kill people to *in*crease the oil price, they should die to *de*crease it.
1
Logical-Let-7026Mar 26, 2026
+7
Everyone shoudl refer to her as...Professional Stephen Tyler cosplay artist Nancy Mace.
She is a scumbag, but one that is self aware enough to know she has to plan for a future without the orange rapist in chief.
7
OrionsBraMar 27, 2026
+1
She had no problem scapegoating America's problems on trans people and enabling MAGA to come to power with no brake checks. She can rot.
1
buried_ledeMar 26, 2026
+4
Most Republicans oppose ground troops
She’s not an outlier
4
newmoonchaperoneMar 26, 2026
+3
to be frank with you, if any of these MAGA populists in the House are for f****** real, intellectually speaking, this is a "short walk".
3
Compliant_SerfMar 26, 2026
+8
Jesus I’m going to buy a l****** ticket.
Rare Mace W
8
dereksalemMar 26, 2026
+16
She's doing nothing but trying to save face for when Trump gets pushed out, so she still has a career in politics.
16
JaronJervisMar 26, 2026
+5
Far too late for that. All MAGAs will be lumped together with the GOP because for the last 10 years nobody has contested Trump's takeover of that party. Like MTG, Nancy Mace can run, but she can't hide her MAGA stench.
5
dereksalemMar 26, 2026
+5
Eh...I think you're overselling the capabilities most people have. They'll see her latest stuff and completely forget the horrible person she is.
It's literally why so many moderates voted for Trump this second term.
5
ars_inveniendiMar 26, 2026
+1
I wouldn’t say _nobody_ contested the takeover. It’s just that anyone who did was driven out of the office or gave up and retired.
1
Vio_Mar 26, 2026
+1
There will be more.
It's all fun and games in the one-party party until a war breaks out and then everyone really has to find their lines in the sand.
1
Zealousideal-Mall973Mar 26, 2026
+3
This stance will last until she is firmly planted in her new role in our dysfunctional government. Then it's back to same Ole same Ole with her.
3
cyberspaceman777Mar 26, 2026
+3
Republicans only care when it affects them
3
doslobo33Mar 26, 2026
+3
A rapist yes, oil no..
3
Crouton_Sharp_MajorMar 26, 2026
+3
Gonna need a lot more of this kind of thing for a long time to trust any these rats abandoning ship. Long live your attention spans, voters.
3
Proper-Mobile-6438Mar 26, 2026
+6
This woman says the right thing every now and then, but flips and becomes malicious on a dime. My vote for most likely to be bipolar.
6
TheBlackUnicornMar 26, 2026
+3
Kinda seems like we're sending our sons and daughters to die to *increase* the price of oil.
3
Drama_DerpMar 26, 2026
+1
I'm sure the cost is offset by their non existent carbon footprint once they die.
Although, I haven't calculated how much fuel it will take to bring their bodies back home. They might just leave them there.
1
RJ5RMar 26, 2026
+2
She's a psycho
2
TapprunnerMar 26, 2026
+2
Trying to straddle that divide so she can run for President and claim in 2 or 6 years that she is "good MAGA". America first, but independent enough to not defend Trump's most indefensible acts and words.
It's bullshit, but that's what she's doing.
2
AlexTom33Mar 26, 2026
+2
The only reason she is doing this is because she running for governor of SC. She doesn't give a shit about the people of the state, she is just working on talking points for her campaign. Vile humans, both Graham and Mace.
2
Seanish12345Mar 26, 2026
+2
It sucks when one of the worst people you know makes a good point
2
blackmobiusMar 26, 2026
+2
Its not the “democrats side”, its just the sensible side.
This war happened because of Trumps ego and because Trump *openly admits* that other countries have hold of him and his interests. Iran isnt defacto completely innocent, but this war was entirely avoidable, even if trump just did nothing whatsoever.
He chose to start this, and thought it would be like the Venezuela campaign; over and done with by day three. He thought it would be like his multiple failed casinos, that you could do whatever, declare bankruptcy, then walk away and everything resets with no long term problems. And he thought that like every other ‘obstacle’ in his life, if you throw enough of a tantrum and enough threats that youll just get your way.
I know the gop is basically Trumps b**** but you would think that after decades of pissing anf moaning about war weariness, the price of oil and gas, and blaming the middle eastern wars on Obama and Biden, that *some GOP* would openly leave the party because of Trumps war.
You’d be wrong
2
Leading-Bonus7478Mar 26, 2026
+1
It's all to change over to a multipolar world. We are all f*ked.
1
SpaceMan_BarcaMar 26, 2026
+2
She’s not running for reflection that’s why she’s allowed to do that.
2
billdietrich1Mar 26, 2026
+2
> to die for the price of oil
Don't be silly. They're being sent to die for Israel.
2
Leading-Bonus7478Mar 26, 2026
+1
[ Removed by Reddit ]
1
FungiiMar 26, 2026
+2
“President Trump has done a phenomenal job,” she said. “So far, he's been excellent, but I am deeply concerned about the Washington war machine, getting their talons into the White House and getting us into a protracted and elongated and endless war with Iran.”
Make of that what you will.
2
emailforgotMar 26, 2026
+2
lol, it's not even for the price of oil.
it's to help Bibi out in his imperialist ambitions
2
canadiumanMar 26, 2026
+2
And the crazy thing is that this war isn't doing anything but significantly increasing the cost of oil.
2
muFUtacoMar 27, 2026
+3
We'll see. A tendency of republicans is to say one thing and do the opposite. Lying seems to come naturally to most of them.
3
californicatingMar 27, 2026
+1
She's doing something good and there's tons of people in this thread still lambasting her for it.
1
HowardBunnyColvinMar 26, 2026
+6
She's actually being reasonable for once.
6
twoods1980Mar 26, 2026
+5
Prob a good day since she took her meds.
5
RandomlyMethodicalMar 26, 2026
+3
Or she ran out of wine
3
Ok-Lets-Talk-It-OutMar 26, 2026
+2
She finally got an intern that is timely with the booze deliveries
2
Travelin_SouljaMar 26, 2026
+5
She can excuse pedophiles and rapists, but she draws the line at gas being expensive.
5
FantasticBicycle37Mar 26, 2026
+4
I'll def take it. But the real thing they're out there dying for isn't the oil...it's to prevent headlines of trump face raping a 13 year old girl who bit his p**** causing him to hit her. *And that's just one email of the millions*
4
exoriparianMar 26, 2026
+4
Haha, you fell for it.
4
localistandMar 26, 2026
+2
All bluster for the spotlight, no action. That phrase is a baseline that anyone could utter. Staying in the same party with a top leader, not exerting any power while in a position of power, is still going along with it to get along with him.
2
Reasonable___DoubtMar 26, 2026
+2
This crazy woman wanted a c**** headline before she votes for it later on.
2
zenbowmanMar 26, 2026
+2
Mace is not even a MAGA person, she's a bog-standard neocon. If Trump has lost even the neocons then the situation on the ground must be way worse than they're letting on.
2
HoosierRedMar 26, 2026
+2
Dont forget the Epstein reason.
2
ElderSmackJackMar 26, 2026
Has nothing to do with that.
0
Pdm1814Mar 26, 2026
+2
Dems should stay far away from this piece of trash. I don’t care what she is saying at this point. She is a psycho and should be treated as such.
2
FantasticBicycle37Mar 26, 2026
+1
Dying for the price of oil is one level of awful, but it's an entirely other thing to die to prevent a pedophile from being in headlines of his pedophiling
1
Basic_Yam_715Mar 26, 2026
+1
oil sure, but mostly to distract from the Epstein files that show the potus is a pedophile and maybe worse...
1
jankytMar 26, 2026
+1
Hegseth doesn't want women in war cause according to him it's bad for the warrior ethos...but not for oil but the pedos "legacy"
1
Tuna_no_crustsMar 26, 2026
+1
Who installed her spine? Maybe she can get some referrals to her colleagues.
1
tsidaMar 26, 2026
+1
Such bravery.
1
Root-magicMar 26, 2026
+1
This statement by Ehud Barak, on what it would take the US and Israel to win, should anger every American
“we would need to deploy two American divisions there and prepare to be there for the long haul.” Two divisions constitute at least 20,000 troops
https://www.theatlantic.com/national-security/2026/03/iran-us-asymmetrical-war/686525/?gift=g6PxTyw5u8kUzvQKa1iib_s6y9LGthOhPVMzOZbRtEg
1
BulawayolandMar 26, 2026
+1
I would have thought the longer our folks in uniform spend there, the higher the price is gonna go... we're not sending them to die to keep the price down, but to keep it up
1
TarbenXsiMar 26, 2026
+1
If only there was a previous vote she could have cast!
1
boston_homoMar 26, 2026
+1
I’m sick of her stupid, go nowhere, sound bites.
1
AdHopeful3801Mar 26, 2026
+1
This clown show time line keeps producing moments where absolutely atrocious people mid up saying useful and accurate things - practically despite themselves.
1
Refun712Mar 26, 2026
+1
We don’t want her. Nobody wants her.
1
ATA_PREMIUMMar 26, 2026
+1
Good. This used to be normal - having evolving alliances between parties without the staunch partisanship over every single issue. More GOP should join the “no war” side considering their entire pitch during the election was ‘America first’.
1
doolpicateMar 26, 2026
+1
This might actually be a russian proxy war, Trump gets paid off for sending in the US army to get wiped out. All the US bases in the Middle east are already wiped with russian intel.
1
exoriparianMar 26, 2026
+1
Go eat some beans, Nancy.
1
TheBugDudeMar 26, 2026
+1
Damn Nancy, Mr. T would be jealous of that chain. Life as a crazy person in politics must pay really well.
1
kobrakai1034Mar 26, 2026
+1
Thanks for the vote but stay on your side, crazy b****.
1
bchoonjMar 26, 2026
+1
She defects to the RUSSIAN side.
1
seeker4482Mar 26, 2026
+1
defecting huh, Nasty Mace? lets see where you vote goes the next time it could actually matter. wouldnt surprise me if you just fall in line like all the other fuckin worms at the end of the day.
1
OkMind2351Mar 26, 2026
+1
Yeah? Silicone implants are products of the **petrochemicals industry** in that they are synthetic polymers derived from petrochemical feedstock, though their base element, silicon, is derived from sand.
1
obalovatykMar 26, 2026
+1
It’s even worse than that. It’s sending forces to fight for Israel.
1
SlumunistmanifistoMar 26, 2026
+1
Ewww, its right this once but, ewwww
1
crappieman62Mar 26, 2026
+1
Where is Boebert at on it?
1
Ok-Advertising4028Mar 26, 2026
+2
Nancy what about the Epstein files??? You’re sitting on names. Now would be a good time to release them. All the republicans who aren’t for Trump can back you up. Just release the names please
2
RealPersonRespondsMar 27, 2026
+1
A Metephor? .....She's the Prettiest Turd in the Toilet?
1
Tasty-Performer6669Mar 27, 2026
+1
Alt headline
*Sun Shines on Dog’s Ass*
1
Background_Cycle2985Mar 27, 2026
+2
democrats don't need her. actually, she can go vote for a democrat that will replace her.
2
AMCorBUST2021Mar 27, 2026
+1
These times make strange bedfellows
1
ogskilletMar 27, 2026
+2
All of her bullshit follows the wind of the media. But behind closed doors she’s a conspiracy theorist idiot. Watch the videos of her and Hilary. Don’t trust her ass
2
Floreat_democratiaMar 27, 2026
+2
Why hasn't anyone yet followed the money trail of the GOP back to the oil companies themselves? That's why they were chosen as candidates by the Koch network in the first place.
2
HedhuntaMar 27, 2026
+1
You already voted for that dumb ass
1
No_Friendship8468Mar 27, 2026
+1
Every picture of this woman, she looks more tapped than the picture before it.
1
KiwDaWabbit2Mar 27, 2026
+1
I’m glad that she seems to have changed her mind, but she is still a bad person.
1
smurkederp25Mar 27, 2026
+1
F****** politicians will be the death of us all
1
ButterscotchdiscsMar 27, 2026
+1
No thanks. Go back over there.
1
Jorgen_G_PakietoMar 27, 2026
+1
What is she on about bro she voted for this exact reality when she voted for Trump in 2026
1
SXMV69Mar 27, 2026
+1
She will backflip after they offer to let her know whether to buy or sell before he posts something.
1
-Metagross-Mar 27, 2026
+1
This is a smart move. She can feel where the wind is blowing.
1
GronkattackMar 26, 2026
+1
Well that's just because the only people she wants to attack and possibly see dead are Trans people.
1
Uglycat123Mar 26, 2026
Finally grew a spine.
0
mandelbratwurstMar 26, 2026
Y’all need to stop bitching when republicans make the right decisions. Seriously good for her, hope more follow.
0
hydraulicmanMar 26, 2026
+2
That’s always the problem though, there’s never more good decisions after that first break over a pet issue, we’ve been burned too many times
It’s always “I realized Trump is bad, he wants to send the marines to small town shelters to murder little puppies! That’s awful!” and then a week later “But obviously, it’s fine for him to break into peoples houses and steal their TVs, and really, we all know he’s right that people from that country over there aren’t really people”
The only actual times we se full on breaks from him are when the politician is resigning or retiring from politics
2
JaronJervisMar 26, 2026
+1
1 good decision followed by 1000 horrible ones, and we should cheer for her?
F*** that, and f*** all MAGA pieces of fascist shit.
1
mandelbratwurstMar 26, 2026
+1
Cool. Explain to me how you expect war funding to be stopped without her and other republicans coming to the right side of things.
F*** her in general, but this move is the right move and we need more republicans to follow it.
1
JaronJervisMar 26, 2026
+1
what have you seen that indicates 90% the GOP won't do what they have been doing, which is going along with everything Trump wants?
1
mandelbratwurstMar 26, 2026
+1
They probably will that doesn’t mean that we don’t acknowledge when they actually do the right thing every now and again
1
mandelbratwurstMar 26, 2026
+1
Because it’s not about Nancy mace it’s about the war. Nobody cares about Nancy Mace we care about ending this stupid ass war!
1
No_Researcher3204Mar 26, 2026
If we invade with boots on the ground over 90% of marines special forces will be obliterated according to several military experts. So why is invading Iran beneficial to the citizens of the USA?
0
Hot-Raisin-2364Mar 26, 2026
F*** off b****. We don't want you either.
0
Lukb4ujumpMar 26, 2026
-3
For the record, they are not being put at risk for the price of oil. If she said this she just proved she is an empty suit. We are trying to stop religious extremist leaders from making war and developing nuclear weapons. Look what they did in an act of frustration, they sent rockets into their allies countries. That is an unhinged response and not reasonable, we don't want those kinds of leaders to have access to nuclear weapons.
Vote her out not for her politics, but because she clearly does not grasp the big picture, so how can she be trusted to make decisions in her position of power.
168 Comments