I have been getting so many new desktop backgrounds from NASA since the launch.
[https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-ii-multimedia/](https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-ii-multimedia/)
Awesome moon shots as well.
190
ChilledDarknessApr 7, 2026
+31
Ok that solar eclipse photo taken the hard way is my new favorite picture ever.
31
wanderingpeddlarApr 7, 2026
+18
Check this one out.
[https://images.nasa.gov/details/SLS%20at%20the%20Pad%20with%20the%20Moon](https://images.nasa.gov/details/SLS%20at%20the%20Pad%20with%20the%20Moon)
18
FhlexApr 7, 2026
+4
Yep, that’s beautiful AF.
4
thejodiefostermuseumApr 7, 2026
Not complaining but..is this a joke? File has 836 kilobytes, seriously? And the other images let you download small 640, medium 1280 and "original" 1280, too. I couldn't be more disappointed.
0
wanderingpeddlarApr 7, 2026
+8
Your complaining all right
[Here with less then 3 minutes of digging ](https://images.nasa.gov/details/Artemis%20II%20at%20the%20pad%20Full%20Snow%20Moon%2002012026_4)
I assume 6960X4640 will be good enough?
8
flcinusaApr 7, 2026
+1
[scoffs]
Stretching an image on my 8k monitor, can't have that
/s
1
thejodiefostermuseumApr 8, 2026
+1
Again not complaining but this was shot down here and still comes heavily compressed at just 3.7MB
1
no8_8oneApr 7, 2026
+11
Thank you
11
wanderingpeddlarApr 7, 2026
+1
No worries enjoy
1
J-MRPApr 7, 2026
+4
Also images.nasa.gov
4
gomezer1180Apr 7, 2026
+4
It’s weird, the earth looks so much bigger than previous shots.
4
BaZing3Apr 7, 2026
+13
[Zoom compression](https://www.tamron.com/global/consumer/sp/impression/detail/article-compression-effect-telephoto-lens-guide.html). Using a longer lens makes things that are farther away (Earth) look bigger in relation to things that are closer (the moon)
13
gomezer1180Apr 7, 2026
+2
Very true, forgot about that…
2
BlueCyannApr 7, 2026
+2
I think it's also very cropped. They didn't really get as close as this image makes it look. A few thousand miles, not a few hundred. You should also check out the originals.
2
wertyrickApr 7, 2026
+2
commenting here to return to this link later
2
SuitableExercise7096Apr 7, 2026
How can I download all of the pictures in one shot?
Website is slow loading
0
wanderingpeddlarApr 7, 2026
+1
It is likely they are getting hugged to death.
1
tx_brandonApr 7, 2026
Earthset photo res is 1536x1024?!
I just downloaded it from the NASA website.
0
malignantzApr 7, 2026
+50
Pretty awesome we get these images of Earth before we blow it up tonight.
We had a good run!
50
Rubix321Apr 7, 2026
+18
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
18
clauderbaughApr 7, 2026
+5
It's ok, I have my towel.
5
Fairweatherfriend-Apr 7, 2026
+1
Hopefully they get a good view of the big boom from over there.
1
redofsamApr 7, 2026
+78
Still blows my mind that we are able to launch people to the moon and safely bring them back
78
Firefox72Apr 7, 2026
+72
The real mindblowing part is that we could do it almost 60 years ago with computers that were way weaker than your average fridge screen these days
72
stuck_in_the_desertApr 7, 2026
+52
Honestly it’s marginally more mind-blowing that someone decided we need fridge screens
52
Chem_BPYApr 7, 2026
+13
How else would they be able to plaster an advertisement directly onto your fridge?
13
BagellordApr 7, 2026
+8
I mean it would be cool to have a fridge that could leverage modern tech to track stock, expiration dates, ideal temperatures etc and would need a management interface. But, that of course comes with the fact that now all of that data gets sold back to advertisers...
Give me my dumb appliances please.
8
APeacefulWarriorApr 8, 2026
+1
If it's any consolation, that sort of tracking would undoubtedly require you to scan in every new item whenever you put it in the fridge. And most likely you'd quit bothering within a couple months, because who wants to spend half an hour just putting their groceries away?
The only way something like that would be practical is if labeling changed so that every single item in the grocery store had an RFID chip with the relevant information on it. Which seeems unlikely.
1
amerovingianApr 7, 2026
Not really, no.
0
classy_barbarianApr 7, 2026
+7
I think what this really what this goes to show is that the computing itself was not the difficult part. The actual math involved in how to calculate trajectories and gravitational pull and whatnot is all worked out on the ground before the rocket takes off. So the onboard computer doesn't actually need to do a lot of serious math on the fly, the 2Mhz CPUs they had back then were more than capable of what they needed it to do. Remember even at at measly 2Mhz, that's still 2 mega hertz meaning 2 million hertz per second. You can do quite a bit of math in 2 million hertz, especially when that math is well optimized in Assembly language.
7
BlueCyannApr 7, 2026
+2
I'm not sure the onboard computer did much trajectory math at all. I know they got course correction burn durations and vectors read off to them by Houston, and all the computer had to do was carry it out once the astronauts had entered the instructions.
2
archbidApr 7, 2026
+3
Relays. Saturn V was filled with relays. It is nuts to see.
3
Direct_Witness1248Apr 7, 2026
+2
That's true, but I think you may be overestimating the amount of people that have a screen on their fridge. "a" fridge screen, sure.
2
symbolsofblueApr 7, 2026
+1
To be fair, their sentence isn't saying that the average fridge *has* a screen. Only that of the fridge screens, the average one is more advanced.
1
Direct_Witness1248Apr 7, 2026
+1
It does now, it didn't before it was edited ;)
1
symbolsofblueApr 7, 2026
+2
Oh, I see. Thanks, I didn't realise it was edited.
2
Anonymous_Autumn_Apr 7, 2026
+1
Reminds me that I have a student whose special interest is WW2 fighter jets and some of the things they could already do then blows my mind.
1
PatReadyApr 7, 2026
+8
Everything about yesterday was amazing. I watched astronauts go around the moon, with video and then watched an eclipse of the sun by moon on YOUTUBE. We have come a long way since Apollo.
8
[deleted]Apr 7, 2026
+5
[deleted]
5
StJsubApr 7, 2026
+3
Its been more like 120 years. And when they went to the moon in 1969 it was only 66 years. There were people who saw both the first powered flight and the first humans to set foot on another celestial body. 5 more years and Apollo 11 will be closer to the wright flyer than present day.
3
bastugubbarApr 7, 2026
+1
You're a bit off. That was 123 years ago.
But yes. Out progress, in particular from 1903-1969 has been amazing.
1
ForsakenRacismApr 7, 2026
We did do this our forefathers did
0
Phillies2002Apr 7, 2026
+5
A lot of strange replies to this comment suggesting the fact that the age of the technology makes it any less remarkable, as if they'd be more impressed by, like, a digital camera
Edit: I guess just one. I thought I'd seen more
5
GuestGulkanApr 7, 2026
+1
It's amazing that any species has ever achieved this. But humans have achieved many amazing things.
If the camera hadn't been invented, this mission would FEEL a lot less impressive. In fact, we wouldn't really be able to experience it in any meaningful way.
So maybe the camera is actually the more impressive achievement.
1
ForsakenRacismApr 7, 2026
-6
Really? We did it 60 years ago.
-6
how_you_doinnApr 7, 2026
+12
Absolutely incredible photographs. Just amazing. One of the benefits of waiting so long to go back is the quality of the images we can take.
12
MechapebblesApr 8, 2026
+1
That's not really a benefit. If we had continued going to the moon and never stopped, that wouldn't have precluded us from still taking these pictures at this present time. In fact, there's a good argument to be made that if we had continued investing in the space program at Apollo Program levels since the early 70s, that technology in general would have much more rapidly advanced and we could have taken such high resolution images much, much sooner than 20-friggin-26.
1
Badgerman97Apr 7, 2026
+56
While our President threatens genocide against a country over a war that he voluntarily started. The United States is simultaneously displaying the best and worst traits of humanity. I pray the best eventually wins out, but I am not hopeful at the moment. I wish I could go live on the Moon and escape all this stupidity we are surrounded with.
56
IncepticonsApr 7, 2026
+19
It really is such a dissonant feeling witnessing the awe and shared beauty of these pictures from this mission, while a depraved maniac threatens nuclear war under the same flag.
19
modernjaneaustenApr 7, 2026
+4
It’s been messing with my head all day that at the exact same time, our astronauts are photographing new views of the moon while our lunatic of a president is basically threatening WW3.
4
veslothiraptrApr 8, 2026
+2
[Just like last time.](https://i.imgur.com/JFHTN3B.png) History rhyming again.
2
GlaitApr 7, 2026
+8
I just keep thinking of the Carl Sagan famous quote about the pale blue dot. This moment should remind us how we are all citizens of the earth.
"It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known."
8
Kytyngurl2Apr 7, 2026
+8
Thank you Artemis team! You’ve been the most gorgeous and scientifically brilliant silver lining to a nasty news dark cloud.
8
Worldly_Anybody_9219Apr 7, 2026
+6
Absolutely incredible pictures. I just stared at them for several minutes trying to wrap my head around the fact that everything we've ever known is on that tiny rock behind the moon.
6
EliMaxsaysSaveEarthApr 7, 2026
+6
They should take a group selfie with Earth in the background so we can have every human ever in one photo.
6
xsm17Apr 7, 2026
+4
I'm pretty sure they did, I remember them arranging it at some point on the livestream with the solar array camera. Seems they haven't posted it yet though.
4
Firefox72Apr 7, 2026
+6
Absolutely incredible pictures.
6
Monolingual-----BetaApr 7, 2026
+5
So damn cool. Love for all the people that toiled to make this happen.
5
Bengrundy_muApr 7, 2026
+5
so do flat earthers think this whole thing is fake news?
5
HumanChalletApr 7, 2026
+3
Is a flyby or a landing?
3
BlueCyannApr 7, 2026
+2
Are you living under a rock? No offense.
Flyby.
2
HumanChalletApr 7, 2026
+3
Honestly didn’t know. I thought they were landing.
3
zernoc56Apr 7, 2026
+3
That is planned for Artemis 3.
3
HumanChalletApr 8, 2026
+1
Yeah saw that and it makes sense
1
BluestreakBTHRApr 8, 2026
+1
Artemis 4, no? Artemis 3 is intended for multi-stage docking in LEO, IIRC.
1
echothree33Apr 8, 2026
+1
Yeah they keep shifting things around so everyone has different knowledge depending on when they last heard about the various missions.
1
Confident-Pace4314Apr 7, 2026
+2
Omg I can see my house
2
penguishedApr 7, 2026
+2
are we getting like an insane 4k movie of stuff out of this? please tell me we do...
2
ihatestheworldApr 7, 2026
+2
They may see some light show if we don't remove the insane orange turd TODAY
2
newMike3400Apr 7, 2026
+5
It’s good that they still get WiFi there to send the images back.
5
Good_Top_9043Apr 7, 2026
+5
Very big WiFi routers
5
petersrinApr 7, 2026
+4
just lasers, that's it. industrial-strength lasers.
4
Kytyngurl2Apr 7, 2026
+3
Nah, two cups with a really really long string
3
v1ennettaApr 7, 2026
+2
Ooooh new background photos for my iPhone
2
KidGorgeous19Apr 7, 2026
+1
Get a good look. Will be a burning heap by about midnight tonight.
1
Hour_Bit_5183Apr 7, 2026
+1
Damn my sentiment exactly right now.. This is an shameful ttimeline. If this were a video game, the hackers just won and it's just buttcheeks
1
jmfeelApr 7, 2026
+1
The only eclipse Ive seen is of trumps war over this historic moment
1
ZardotabApr 7, 2026
+1
Why does the moon look brown here? It's gray or silver from just about any angle. (Resisting failing toilet jokes.)
1
Direct_Witness1248Apr 7, 2026
+3
Light and shade.
3
BlueCyannApr 7, 2026
+2
Its color is often reported to be brown actually (by people who've been there and seen it; one of the astronauts on Artemis was commenting it seemed really brown during the flyby). I remember the images from a Chinese rover about a decade ago looked very brown, too. Seems to be a matter of how much light is reflecting, and maybe the optics being used in the case of photographs.
2
ZardotabApr 7, 2026
+1
Atronauts usually have to use radiation-resistant windows and visors, which do add a tint to the view. It could be related. I think it was Buzz Aldrin who said his space suit's visor made the moon look yellowish. He knew this because one can push up the radiation-guard layer of glass if needed. It's meant to use only when getting ready inside the capsule where the light is dim, but Buzz briefly tested his outside view without.
1
PaulaDeen21Apr 7, 2026
+1
Hmmm so it’s not flat then?
1
CptVagueApr 7, 2026
+1
Which, the Earth or the moon? Answer's still no, but it's an important distinction.
1
PaulaDeen21Apr 7, 2026
+1
Both! Seeing as the Moon was formed form material from the Earth would make sense for it to be same flat material or as this image appears to show, round material.
1
StarktechJanitorApr 7, 2026
-2
I don't care. Iran is about to be nuked setting off WW3. The astronauts will have an irradiated wasteland to come home to.
-2
IohetApr 7, 2026
-5
Imagine if we used that money to clean up the environment or feed people or pay for healthcare or something. I just can't get excited about any of this anymore
-5
NukedForZenitcoApr 8, 2026
+3
Yeah because the cost of this mission would be enough for any one of those. Science shouldn't pause because you choose to simplify complex issues down to a few words.
3
Far-Cellist1216Apr 8, 2026
+1
Space exploration is necessary. The Sun will eventually burn out, and the possibility of an asteroid hitting Earth is not impossible. Humanity needs to prepare for the possibility of leaving this planet if necessary; otherwise, we could face extinction.
Instead of complaining about the money spent on exploring space, it would make far more sense not to spend it dropping bombs on other countries. But your tiny brain probably isn’t capable of thinking that far ahead
89 Comments