I have been getting so many new desktop backgrounds from NASA since the launch.
[https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-ii-multimedia/](https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-ii-multimedia/)
Awesome moon shots as well.
190
ChilledDarkness3 days ago
+31
Ok that solar eclipse photo taken the hard way is my new favorite picture ever.
31
wanderingpeddlar3 days ago
+18
Check this one out.
[https://images.nasa.gov/details/SLS%20at%20the%20Pad%20with%20the%20Moon](https://images.nasa.gov/details/SLS%20at%20the%20Pad%20with%20the%20Moon)
18
Fhlex3 days ago
+4
Yep, that’s beautiful AF.
4
thejodiefostermuseum3 days ago
Not complaining but..is this a joke? File has 836 kilobytes, seriously? And the other images let you download small 640, medium 1280 and "original" 1280, too. I couldn't be more disappointed.
0
wanderingpeddlar3 days ago
+8
Your complaining all right
[Here with less then 3 minutes of digging ](https://images.nasa.gov/details/Artemis%20II%20at%20the%20pad%20Full%20Snow%20Moon%2002012026_4)
I assume 6960X4640 will be good enough?
8
flcinusa3 days ago
+1
[scoffs]
Stretching an image on my 8k monitor, can't have that
/s
1
thejodiefostermuseum3 days ago
+1
Again not complaining but this was shot down here and still comes heavily compressed at just 3.7MB
1
no8_8one3 days ago
+11
Thank you
11
wanderingpeddlar3 days ago
+1
No worries enjoy
1
J-MRP3 days ago
+4
Also images.nasa.gov
4
gomezer11803 days ago
+4
It’s weird, the earth looks so much bigger than previous shots.
4
BaZing33 days ago
+13
[Zoom compression](https://www.tamron.com/global/consumer/sp/impression/detail/article-compression-effect-telephoto-lens-guide.html). Using a longer lens makes things that are farther away (Earth) look bigger in relation to things that are closer (the moon)
13
gomezer11803 days ago
+2
Very true, forgot about that…
2
BlueCyann3 days ago
+2
I think it's also very cropped. They didn't really get as close as this image makes it look. A few thousand miles, not a few hundred. You should also check out the originals.
2
wertyrick3 days ago
+2
commenting here to return to this link later
2
SuitableExercise70963 days ago
How can I download all of the pictures in one shot?
Website is slow loading
0
wanderingpeddlar3 days ago
+1
It is likely they are getting hugged to death.
1
tx_brandon3 days ago
Earthset photo res is 1536x1024?!
I just downloaded it from the NASA website.
0
malignantz3 days ago
+50
Pretty awesome we get these images of Earth before we blow it up tonight.
We had a good run!
50
Rubix3213 days ago
+18
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
18
clauderbaugh3 days ago
+5
It's ok, I have my towel.
5
Fairweatherfriend-3 days ago
+1
Hopefully they get a good view of the big boom from over there.
1
redofsam3 days ago
+78
Still blows my mind that we are able to launch people to the moon and safely bring them back
78
Firefox723 days ago
+72
The real mindblowing part is that we could do it almost 60 years ago with computers that were way weaker than your average fridge screen these days
72
stuck_in_the_desert3 days ago
+52
Honestly it’s marginally more mind-blowing that someone decided we need fridge screens
52
Chem_BPY3 days ago
+13
How else would they be able to plaster an advertisement directly onto your fridge?
13
Bagellord3 days ago
+8
I mean it would be cool to have a fridge that could leverage modern tech to track stock, expiration dates, ideal temperatures etc and would need a management interface. But, that of course comes with the fact that now all of that data gets sold back to advertisers...
Give me my dumb appliances please.
8
APeacefulWarrior3 days ago
+1
If it's any consolation, that sort of tracking would undoubtedly require you to scan in every new item whenever you put it in the fridge. And most likely you'd quit bothering within a couple months, because who wants to spend half an hour just putting their groceries away?
The only way something like that would be practical is if labeling changed so that every single item in the grocery store had an RFID chip with the relevant information on it. Which seeems unlikely.
1
amerovingian3 days ago
Not really, no.
0
classy_barbarian3 days ago
+7
I think what this really what this goes to show is that the computing itself was not the difficult part. The actual math involved in how to calculate trajectories and gravitational pull and whatnot is all worked out on the ground before the rocket takes off. So the onboard computer doesn't actually need to do a lot of serious math on the fly, the 2Mhz CPUs they had back then were more than capable of what they needed it to do. Remember even at at measly 2Mhz, that's still 2 mega hertz meaning 2 million hertz per second. You can do quite a bit of math in 2 million hertz, especially when that math is well optimized in Assembly language.
7
BlueCyann3 days ago
+2
I'm not sure the onboard computer did much trajectory math at all. I know they got course correction burn durations and vectors read off to them by Houston, and all the computer had to do was carry it out once the astronauts had entered the instructions.
2
archbid3 days ago
+3
Relays. Saturn V was filled with relays. It is nuts to see.
3
Direct_Witness12483 days ago
+2
That's true, but I think you may be overestimating the amount of people that have a screen on their fridge. "a" fridge screen, sure.
2
symbolsofblue3 days ago
+1
To be fair, their sentence isn't saying that the average fridge *has* a screen. Only that of the fridge screens, the average one is more advanced.
1
Direct_Witness12483 days ago
+1
It does now, it didn't before it was edited ;)
1
symbolsofblue3 days ago
+2
Oh, I see. Thanks, I didn't realise it was edited.
2
Anonymous_Autumn_3 days ago
+1
Reminds me that I have a student whose special interest is WW2 fighter jets and some of the things they could already do then blows my mind.
1
PatReady3 days ago
+8
Everything about yesterday was amazing. I watched astronauts go around the moon, with video and then watched an eclipse of the sun by moon on YOUTUBE. We have come a long way since Apollo.
8
[deleted]3 days ago
+5
[deleted]
5
StJsub3 days ago
+3
Its been more like 120 years. And when they went to the moon in 1969 it was only 66 years. There were people who saw both the first powered flight and the first humans to set foot on another celestial body. 5 more years and Apollo 11 will be closer to the wright flyer than present day.
3
bastugubbar3 days ago
+1
You're a bit off. That was 123 years ago.
But yes. Out progress, in particular from 1903-1969 has been amazing.
1
ForsakenRacism3 days ago
We did do this our forefathers did
0
Phillies20023 days ago
+5
A lot of strange replies to this comment suggesting the fact that the age of the technology makes it any less remarkable, as if they'd be more impressed by, like, a digital camera
Edit: I guess just one. I thought I'd seen more
5
GuestGulkan3 days ago
+1
It's amazing that any species has ever achieved this. But humans have achieved many amazing things.
If the camera hadn't been invented, this mission would FEEL a lot less impressive. In fact, we wouldn't really be able to experience it in any meaningful way.
So maybe the camera is actually the more impressive achievement.
1
ForsakenRacism3 days ago
-6
Really? We did it 60 years ago.
-6
how_you_doinn3 days ago
+12
Absolutely incredible photographs. Just amazing. One of the benefits of waiting so long to go back is the quality of the images we can take.
12
Mechapebbles3 days ago
+1
That's not really a benefit. If we had continued going to the moon and never stopped, that wouldn't have precluded us from still taking these pictures at this present time. In fact, there's a good argument to be made that if we had continued investing in the space program at Apollo Program levels since the early 70s, that technology in general would have much more rapidly advanced and we could have taken such high resolution images much, much sooner than 20-friggin-26.
1
Badgerman973 days ago
+56
While our President threatens genocide against a country over a war that he voluntarily started. The United States is simultaneously displaying the best and worst traits of humanity. I pray the best eventually wins out, but I am not hopeful at the moment. I wish I could go live on the Moon and escape all this stupidity we are surrounded with.
56
Incepticons3 days ago
+19
It really is such a dissonant feeling witnessing the awe and shared beauty of these pictures from this mission, while a depraved maniac threatens nuclear war under the same flag.
19
modernjaneausten3 days ago
+4
It’s been messing with my head all day that at the exact same time, our astronauts are photographing new views of the moon while our lunatic of a president is basically threatening WW3.
4
veslothiraptr3 days ago
+2
[Just like last time.](https://i.imgur.com/JFHTN3B.png) History rhyming again.
2
Glait3 days ago
+8
I just keep thinking of the Carl Sagan famous quote about the pale blue dot. This moment should remind us how we are all citizens of the earth.
"It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known."
8
Kytyngurl23 days ago
+8
Thank you Artemis team! You’ve been the most gorgeous and scientifically brilliant silver lining to a nasty news dark cloud.
8
Worldly_Anybody_92193 days ago
+6
Absolutely incredible pictures. I just stared at them for several minutes trying to wrap my head around the fact that everything we've ever known is on that tiny rock behind the moon.
6
EliMaxsaysSaveEarth3 days ago
+6
They should take a group selfie with Earth in the background so we can have every human ever in one photo.
6
xsm173 days ago
+4
I'm pretty sure they did, I remember them arranging it at some point on the livestream with the solar array camera. Seems they haven't posted it yet though.
4
Firefox723 days ago
+6
Absolutely incredible pictures.
6
Monolingual-----Beta3 days ago
+5
So damn cool. Love for all the people that toiled to make this happen.
5
Bengrundy_mu3 days ago
+5
so do flat earthers think this whole thing is fake news?
5
HumanChallet3 days ago
+3
Is a flyby or a landing?
3
BlueCyann3 days ago
+2
Are you living under a rock? No offense.
Flyby.
2
HumanChallet3 days ago
+3
Honestly didn’t know. I thought they were landing.
3
zernoc563 days ago
+3
That is planned for Artemis 3.
3
HumanChallet3 days ago
+1
Yeah saw that and it makes sense
1
BluestreakBTHR3 days ago
+1
Artemis 4, no? Artemis 3 is intended for multi-stage docking in LEO, IIRC.
1
echothree333 days ago
+1
Yeah they keep shifting things around so everyone has different knowledge depending on when they last heard about the various missions.
1
Confident-Pace43143 days ago
+2
Omg I can see my house
2
penguished3 days ago
+2
are we getting like an insane 4k movie of stuff out of this? please tell me we do...
2
ihatestheworld3 days ago
+2
They may see some light show if we don't remove the insane orange turd TODAY
2
newMike34003 days ago
+5
It’s good that they still get WiFi there to send the images back.
5
Good_Top_90433 days ago
+5
Very big WiFi routers
5
petersrin3 days ago
+4
just lasers, that's it. industrial-strength lasers.
4
Kytyngurl23 days ago
+3
Nah, two cups with a really really long string
3
v1ennetta3 days ago
+2
Ooooh new background photos for my iPhone
2
KidGorgeous193 days ago
+1
Get a good look. Will be a burning heap by about midnight tonight.
1
Hour_Bit_51833 days ago
+1
Damn my sentiment exactly right now.. This is an shameful ttimeline. If this were a video game, the hackers just won and it's just buttcheeks
1
jmfeel3 days ago
+1
The only eclipse Ive seen is of trumps war over this historic moment
1
Zardotab3 days ago
+1
Why does the moon look brown here? It's gray or silver from just about any angle. (Resisting failing toilet jokes.)
1
Direct_Witness12483 days ago
+3
Light and shade.
3
BlueCyann3 days ago
+2
Its color is often reported to be brown actually (by people who've been there and seen it; one of the astronauts on Artemis was commenting it seemed really brown during the flyby). I remember the images from a Chinese rover about a decade ago looked very brown, too. Seems to be a matter of how much light is reflecting, and maybe the optics being used in the case of photographs.
2
Zardotab3 days ago
+1
Atronauts usually have to use radiation-resistant windows and visors, which do add a tint to the view. It could be related. I think it was Buzz Aldrin who said his space suit's visor made the moon look yellowish. He knew this because one can push up the radiation-guard layer of glass if needed. It's meant to use only when getting ready inside the capsule where the light is dim, but Buzz briefly tested his outside view without.
1
PaulaDeen213 days ago
+1
Hmmm so it’s not flat then?
1
CptVague3 days ago
+1
Which, the Earth or the moon? Answer's still no, but it's an important distinction.
1
PaulaDeen213 days ago
+1
Both! Seeing as the Moon was formed form material from the Earth would make sense for it to be same flat material or as this image appears to show, round material.
1
StarktechJanitor3 days ago
-2
I don't care. Iran is about to be nuked setting off WW3. The astronauts will have an irradiated wasteland to come home to.
-2
Iohet3 days ago
-5
Imagine if we used that money to clean up the environment or feed people or pay for healthcare or something. I just can't get excited about any of this anymore
-5
NukedForZenitco3 days ago
+3
Yeah because the cost of this mission would be enough for any one of those. Science shouldn't pause because you choose to simplify complex issues down to a few words.
3
Far-Cellist12163 days ago
+1
Space exploration is necessary. The Sun will eventually burn out, and the possibility of an asteroid hitting Earth is not impossible. Humanity needs to prepare for the possibility of leaving this planet if necessary; otherwise, we could face extinction.
Instead of complaining about the money spent on exploring space, it would make far more sense not to spend it dropping bombs on other countries. But your tiny brain probably isn’t capable of thinking that far ahead
89 Comments