Netanyahu announced the continuation of Israel's and the US's fight against Iran

Julian, what’s a shit hawk?

A man's gotta eat!

they've delayed elections in the past for wars, there is precedent, but we don't know for sure.

"Some of you may die, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make." Lord Farquaad, Shrek

> with margins that they can topple netanyahu Current poles state that ben gvir might be out of the government unless they again join forces with other parties (which currently it doesn't seem likely). Beside his core supporters, he lost a lot of outside support, as his true face came about since last elections. A lot of people who voted for him regret it immensely. So 2026 elections might give netanyahu more power due to votes moving away from the extreme right to him. So pushing the war and delaying it to as close as possible to the elections, will give enough fear mongering to try and collect more power to himself.

That may or may not be true, and is entirely dependent on how much money they are able to generate as a result of the degradation of their economy. To the point though, your comment is a prognostication about the outcome of the war that has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not it has been a goal of his entire political career (it has). > [His public statements have repeatedly framed Tehran’s atomic ambitions as an urgent and growing threat, a view that has shaped both Israel’s national security posture and its dealings with the United States.](https://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/newswire/man-cried-bomb-netanyahu-spent-30-years-warning-irans-nuclear-weapons-imminent/) > [Netanyahu began issuing such alerts in the early 1990s, during his time as a member of Israel’s parliament. In a 1992 speech to the Knesset, he suggested that Iran was within three to five years of achieving independent nuclear weapons production.](https://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/newswire/man-cried-bomb-netanyahu-spent-30-years-warning-irans-nuclear-weapons-imminent/) > [He would go on to reaffirm that assessment in his 1995 book, Fighting Terrorism, arguing that Iran’s nuclear intentions posed a dire challenge to global security. The idea of a narrow and closing window to stop Iran’s nuclear program soon became a recurring theme in Netanyahu’s diplomacy.](https://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/newswire/man-cried-bomb-netanyahu-spent-30-years-warning-irans-nuclear-weapons-imminent/) > [In 2002, he testified before the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, advocating for military action in Iraq while linking Baghdad’s suspected weapons programs with those of Tehran. The United States invaded Iraq the following year, though subsequent inspections found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction.](https://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/newswire/man-cried-bomb-netanyahu-spent-30-years-warning-irans-nuclear-weapons-imminent/) > [Years later, in 2009, Netanyahu reportedly told U.S. lawmakers that Iran remained only a year or two away from building a nuclear device.](https://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/newswire/man-cried-bomb-netanyahu-spent-30-years-warning-irans-nuclear-weapons-imminent/)

So let's say both are equivalent, you still want to fund another terrorist regime ? Or you just interested in dumb "gotcha" post?

I don't wish for the Iranian regime to have any protection.

Rapture theology preaches that if the end times occur, that every Christian will be “caught up” and taken to heaven before the “Tribulation” where all the war and apocalyptic events occur on Earth. It also preaches that Israel will ultimately be victorious. Evangelical Christianity in the United States simultaneously preaches that the end times will bring about immediate relief to all christian problems while ensuring the defeat of their perceived enemies.

Mistake #1 - assuming religion is logical.