I wouldn't read much into this, because this is pretty normal for Switzerland. As I understand it, the only time they ever allow military aircraft in their airspace is for medical evacuations, and even then they get fighter jet e****** the entire way.
Neutral country and all that.
410
cetootskiApr 1, 2026
+31
Trump doesn't read but he will read much into this....
31
KovyJacksonApr 1, 2026
+1
1776% tariff on Swiss Army knives
1
ragnaroksunsetApr 1, 2026
+4
>I wouldn't read much into this
Sure, if it were happening in isolation. But it's part of a trend among historically neutral and non-neutral states alike.
4
NurkanurkaApr 1, 2026
+1
Doing what you've always done, in the way you've always done it is not participating in any trends.
Just because your granddads shoes he's worn for 40 years suddenly become "in", doesn't make him trendy.
1
ragnaroksunsetApr 1, 2026
+1
You're allowed to ignore whatever you want, and we're allowed to note that you're just being dismissive.
It calibrates how seriously you are taken. Choose accordingly.
1
Tur4mb4rApr 1, 2026
+69
Austria is doing the same (both neutral countries)
69
[deleted]Apr 1, 2026
-23
[deleted]
-23
MoistyBoiPrimeApr 1, 2026
+40
Not letting other militaries into your country is like half of what being neutral is.
40
VanillaHighlightsApr 1, 2026
+8
Well, yeah, but they could try being like... *more* neutral, y'know?
lol c'mon dude
8
ragnaroksunsetApr 1, 2026
+9
No, in the context of geopolitical conflict this is as neutral as you can get. Further neutrality would require somehow relocating your country to another planet or dimension.
9
CorrectTarget8957Apr 1, 2026
+20
That's the defenition of normal isn't it?
20
LewisWhatsHisNameApr 1, 2026
+119
I spilled a glass of water, and now the floor's wet
119
HAUNTERVIRUSApr 1, 2026
+59
" WHY AREN'T MY NEIGHBORS CLEANING UP MY SPILL?!"
59
meadebApr 1, 2026
+32
Think I’m going to leave the neighbourhood watch group because Craig from next door won’t come and clean up my mess. What a bunch of losers!
32
Monolingual-----BetaApr 1, 2026
+8
Well I offered to help when you first spilled it, before you realized it was getting into hard to reach places.
8
xynith116Apr 1, 2026
+29
This is a beige alert.
29
emaw63Apr 1, 2026
+23
If I don't make it, tell my wife I said "Hello"
23
FarmTacoApr 1, 2026
+9
What makes a man turn neutral? Lust for gold? Power? Or were you just born with a heart full of neutrality?
9
RatiocinorApr 1, 2026
+57
- Spain ✅
- France ✅
- Italy ✅
- Switzerland ✅
Come on UK don't let me down now...
57
QuickMartyrApr 1, 2026
+17
While that, Portugal is opening its legs to the americans rapists.
17
Upset_Ad3954Apr 1, 2026
+6
It's still tight unless Morocco allows it.
6
MordikenApr 1, 2026
+2
*cheeks.
2
arul20Apr 1, 2026
Starmer has no balls.
0
Marmite-Badgers-MumApr 1, 2026
+27
I mean, he had enough balls to say no to joining the war, much against the will of the UK press and opposition parties. He held his nerve and public opinion is clearly on his side.
27
MoD1982Apr 1, 2026
+4
It's not our war, simple as that.
4
Marmite-Badgers-MumApr 1, 2026
+6
100%. Had we had Kemi or Farage leading now though I feel like we'd be balls deep into it.
6
mcgee300Apr 1, 2026
+8
Think you're wrong here. Starmer has handled Trump and his bullshit quite well in my opinion.
8
Specialist-Garbage94Apr 1, 2026
+5
And no oil apparently lol
/s
5
2cats2hatsApr 1, 2026
+1
This is unfair and inaccurate in context of post.
1
Reddit_2_2024Apr 1, 2026
+10
That makes Spain, Italy and now Switzerland. European air space for overflights is getting smaller.
10
SparksMKIIApr 1, 2026
+6
You can add France as well now
6
Big-Combination-1969Apr 1, 2026
+6
Every country should
6
GagOnMacaqueApr 1, 2026
+3
Please bring sanctions. He's not going to get it till the planet is against him.
3
physicskingApr 1, 2026
+6
Our list of friends grows thin
(pretend it is the LotR gif)
6
Hefty-Comparison-801Apr 1, 2026
+8
Breaking News: Switzerland still neutral.
8
SlightlyAngyKittyApr 1, 2026
+1
Trump on Switzerland..
https://youtu.be/k8ws_APXilE
1
Pretend_Location_548Apr 1, 2026
+4
though I have to wonder: if the US military was to not give a flying f***, and go still go through airspace, what would Switzerland do?
4
willstr1Apr 1, 2026
+15
They likely updated their policy since then, but IIRC during WWII the Swiss policy was to shoot down any plane regardless of which side it was from
15
Johannes_PApr 1, 2026
+6
Switzerland even had internment camps for downed pilots to be held until the end of war.
6
Pretend_Location_548Apr 1, 2026
+8
like this would ever happen nowadays... If this kind of event were to occur, swiss politics would probably scramble together to find a loophole in the swiss policy so as to *not* do anything.
8
yosisoyApr 1, 2026
I don't think they can technically
0
Cynical_ClassicistApr 1, 2026
+9
Switzerland is doing better than the UK.
9
AdFeeling842Apr 1, 2026
+32
well neutrality sounds nice until you realise switzerland blocked their allies from sending their stocks of swiss-made ammo to ukraine..all that ammo just sitting in warehouses getting rusty whilst the largest ground war in europe since ww2 is happening next door
32
derFensterputzerApr 1, 2026
+7
Yeah that one is fucked.
The explanation behind it takes a bit to explain but to cut it short: african warlord in the 60/70s used swiss made AA guns to shoot at planes from the red cross trying to deliver aid, additional it came out that swiss guns appeared in all sorts of warzones in the hands of 'badguys'. After that pretty much all exports were banned.
Over the years it got more and more relaxed but at the time the war started and as of now it's fully illegal to send weapons to a warzone and to allow other countries the resale of swiss made arms into warzones.
So legally the Bundesrat couldn't comply, even if they wanted. Of course our weapons industry got rightfully fucked by that because only an imbecile would at this point buy arms from us.
Now what really pisses me off:
There is a coming change to that law that would allow the bundesrat to allow the sale and resale of arms into warzones to 'trusted partners' that basically include NATO (except Turkiye), the EU, UK, Australia, Japan, Canada ... But these mfers didn't add Ukraine to that list...
I get it with the amount of corruption in ukraine before the war, but it's tonedeaf at best and I f****** hate it.
That is if the law passes a referendum against it... Which will be another story in and for itself as a pretty big alliance of pacifists and ukraine supporters don't want it in the current form.
7
EconomicRegret2Apr 1, 2026
+3
> switzerland blocked their allies from sending their stocks of swiss-made ammo to ukraine
1. Switzerland has no allies.
2. It's literally in the contract: no sending of swiss-made military products to countries in conflict.
3
oliviashrewtonbongApr 1, 2026
+6
?
The UK has been among the more hostile towards the US, to the extent that Cheetoh keeps shit talking them.
6
zyzzrustleburgerApr 1, 2026
+13
Hostile = not saying yes to everything?
13
oliviashrewtonbongApr 1, 2026
+6
Hostile was the wrong word, more like non compliant. But yes. Find it bizarre how the UK are damned if they do and damned if they don't. Actual leech countries like Ireland should really be under examination
6
throwawayaccount_usuApr 1, 2026
+4
What has Ireland done?
4
arul20Apr 1, 2026
-5
It's just the typical deflect, deny tactic. UK is US's butt b****.
-5
throwawayaccount_usuApr 1, 2026
+6
Ireland is actually using an airport for US military weapons transport to Israel it turns out
Which is ironic given all the politicans condemning Israel lol
6
DaveShadowApr 1, 2026
+2
Ironically, the government constantly gets hit domestically for not hitting Israel hard enough at all, despite the people wanting them too, they constantly pussyfoot round Israel and refuse to genuinely take actions they could take to let their frustrations be known.
2
[deleted]Apr 1, 2026
+6
[deleted]
6
oliviashrewtonbongApr 1, 2026
+3
Yes and no.
The real bad guys are countries like Bulgaria that allowed the US to do whatever the hell they wanted. The UK pushed back more than most. But hurrdurr UK bad
3
FrientliesApr 1, 2026
+3
The UK folded fairly quickly compared to a lot of Western European countries.
They essentially denied the first round of attacks and then declared it was now a “defensive” operation and allowed for the US to utilize their bases for the continued military campaign.
3
oliviashrewtonbongApr 1, 2026
+7
Only following an attempted Iranian attack on Cyprus and Diego garcia. I don't see how any of this is incongruous or inconsistent
7
FrientliesApr 1, 2026
+1
Well it’s a little disingenuous to call it defensive operations when in reality we were the aggressors (I am American).
Iran, although I certainly don’t support them or this regime, wasn’t the aggressor here. They attacked air bases after they were attacked first.
1
Thurak0Apr 1, 2026
+1
By now B1 bombers from UK bases are involved and the UK defends not only Cyprus, but also Gulf States. B1 bombers are not really defensive in nature (and I don't care that the US claim to only hit missile launchers with them) and the support for Gulf States with planes intercepting enemy drones is not "staying out" of the war.
It's good that the UK gives way less support than in other wars, but it is (by now) more than the rhetoric of the PM suggests.
1
helmApr 1, 2026
+1
Different starting point.
1
tagillasloverApr 1, 2026
-13
Why would the uk support Iran? It’s in their best interest the Iranian regime is defeated, they’ve been a pain to the west for decades and decades
-13
kngwallApr 1, 2026
+10
Yeah I wonder how the revolution who put the crazies in power happened by the way...?
10
tagillasloverApr 1, 2026
-5
Doesn’t really matter, can’t undo it. You don’t also blame the uk for trump do you?
-5
Ingr1dApr 1, 2026
+1
I think it’s very logical to blame the UK for the state of affairs in Iran.
1
Ok-AssumptioApr 1, 2026
+3
Dafuq u r talking about?
3
FrientliesApr 1, 2026
-3
The current Iranian regime is a global supporter of terrorism, and are essentially a Chinese puppet.
This entire campaign, despite the continued dialogue about it “not being regime change focused”… it clearly is.
Rehza Pahlavi will be put into power as an interim leader if the US can achieve its goals… I’m calling it now.
-3
tagillasloverApr 1, 2026
-5
Seems pretty obvious to me. The best thing at this point for the uk (and basically everyone else) is Iran being defeated. They even struck a uk airbase. Countries can allow the us to use their airspace and airfields to support the best outcome for them without being directly involved
-5
Ingr1dApr 1, 2026
+4
I don’t know why you think giving the US free reign to topple any government it wants by force is the best outcome for countries around the world.
4
tagillasloverApr 1, 2026
+2
Do you think leaving an angry Iranian regime around is a better one?
2
Ingr1dApr 1, 2026
+1
The Iranians are rational enough to at least abide by agreements. I don’t know why you are completely discounting the idea of diplomacy.
1
XaendroApr 1, 2026
Noone has been worrying about supporting iran at all, that's nowhere near the point
Not to mention that the UK complaining about Iran being a pain would be peak irony, they are the ones who caused everything that's going on in iran
0
KhshayarshahApr 1, 2026
+1
If the US mulls any support to Ukraine then suddenly they are in bed in Russia and are helping Putin.
But if the EU stands in front of operations against the terrorist regime in Iran that slaughters its own people that is suddenly "nowhere near the point". There isn't even an attempt to consistent about any of this.
1
navorApr 1, 2026
-6
Always have and always will
-6
Kaje26Apr 1, 2026
+4
Because Iran was attacked for no reason because the president is a pedophile?
4
Balja1989Apr 1, 2026
+1
Ah Switzerland. Norway on steroids
1
Ill_Wolverine_6265Apr 1, 2026
+1
Mais ils achètent leur F35... Belle hypocrisie.
1
moljnir40Apr 1, 2026
-3
QUIT REPEATING THE LIE!!! Switzerland has NEVER been neutral and NEVER will be neutral. All they care about is money and EVERY decision they make is based upon economic impact.
-3
EconomicRegret2Apr 1, 2026
These last 500 years, when has Switzerland's military crossed its borders? Or intervened in foreign wars? Or had alliances with foreign militaries?
That's literally the definition of neutrality: your military stays within your borders and is used only for defense purposes!
0
Upstairs-Inspection3Apr 1, 2026
-19
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland\_during\_the\_world\_wars#Financial\_relationships\_with\_Nazi\_Germany](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland_during_the_world_wars#Financial_relationships_with_Nazi_Germany)
>Between 1940 and 1945, the German [Reichsbank](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichsbank) sold 1.3 billion francs (approximately 18 billion francs adjusted for inflation to 2019) worth of gold to Swiss banks in exchange for Swiss francs and other foreign currency, which were used to buy strategically important raw materials like [tungsten](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungsten) and oil from neutral countries.[^(\[37\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland_during_the_world_wars#cite_note-ICE_107-37) Hundreds of millions of francs' worth of this gold was [monetary gold](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_standard) plundered from the [central banks](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_bank) of occupied countries. A total of 581,000 francs' worth of "Melmer" gold taken from [Holocaust](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust) victims in eastern Europe was sold to Swiss banks.[^(\[37\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland_during_the_world_wars#cite_note-ICE_107-37)
history repeats itself, switzerland has always been complicit with the enemy
-19
Forsaken1887Apr 1, 2026
+15
And who’s the enemy in this case? Iran is not the enemy of Europe, but maybe the orange pedophile that threatened Denmark with an invasion, yes.
15
Upstairs-Inspection3Apr 1, 2026
-8
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran\_and\_state-sponsored\_terrorism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism)
>Denmark
>In October 2018, [Denmark](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denmark) said the Iranian government intelligence service had tried to carry out a plot to assassinate an Iranian Arab opposition figure on its soil.[^(\[4\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#cite_note-Demark=-ABC-2018-4) The planned assassination was of an exiled leader of the [Arab Struggle Movement for the Liberation of Ahvaz](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Struggle_Movement_for_the_Liberation_of_Ahvaz) (ASMLA). Sweden extradited a Norwegian national of Iranian background to Denmark in connection with the foiled plot against the ASMLA leader.[^(\[35\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#cite_note-jpostAlbaniaplot-35) In February 2020 Denmark arrested three leading members of an (ASMLA) group on suspicion of spying for Saudi Arabia and for supporting an attack in Iran in 2018.[^(\[36\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#cite_note-36)
>France
>Main article: [Iranian diplomat terror plot trial](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_diplomat_terror_plot_trial)
>In October 2018 France froze Iranian financial assets in response to an alleged bomb plot to be carried out against an opposition group at a rally in Paris. The plot was said to be against the [National Council of Resistance of Iran](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Council_of_Resistance_of_Iran), which styles itself as Iran's [government-in-exile](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government-in-exile).[^(\[5\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#cite_note-france-thetimes-2018-5) [Assadollah Assadi](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assadollah_Assadi), an Iranian diplomat in the [Vienna](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna) embassy, was arrested in [Germany](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany) in connection with the alleged plot to blow up a meeting of Iranian dissidents in [Paris](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris) in June.[^(\[35\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#cite_note-jpostAlbaniaplot-35)
>The rally was attended by an estimated 100,000 Iranians and hundreds of international dignitaries. A [British Member of Parliament](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_of_Parliament_(United_Kingdom)) who attended said "Had the plot succeeded, it would have been the deadliest terror operation ever carried out in Europe. The US would undeniably have declared war on Iran – and it was only because the plot was foiled, world war three was averted." [Belgian](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgium) police had been informed of a possible attack on the rally, and found 550g (1lb 3oz) of explosive and a detonator in the car of Amir Saadouni and Nasimeh Naami. Saadouni, Naami, Assadi (believed to be the mastermind), and another Iranian went on trial in [Antwerp](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antwerp) on 27 November 2020. Court documents allege that Assadi was ordered by Iranian authorities to smuggle the explosives into Europe on a commercial flight, and give them to Saadouni and Naami, who were arrested two days later.[^(\[37\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#cite_note-37)
>In February 2021 Belgian court in Antwerp sentenced Assadollah Assadi to 20-year jail term for this bomb plot. Amir Saadouni and Nasimeh Naami and a fourth man, Belgian-Iranian poet [Merhad Arefani](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merhad_Arefani&action=edit&redlink=1), who was arrested in Paris and accused of being an accomplice, were convicted of taking part in the plot and given jail terms of 15 to 18 years.[^(\[38\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#cite_note-38)
>Sweden
>According to [Doku.nu](http://Doku.nu), two men in Sweden, Mohammad Heidari and Shayan Tousynezhad, are linked to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and allegedly used false identities to gain asylum. Despite warnings from German authorities and suspicions they planned to target Swedish Jews, they were granted residency and are believed to pose a threat to Swedish security and the Iranian diaspora. Experts warn they may be part of a broader network of Iranian agents operating in Sweden.[^(\[90\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#cite_note-90)
you were saying?
-8
arul20Apr 1, 2026
+10
None of these show they are enemies of the host countries themselves. Yes going after Iranian opposition in Europe is bad behaviour but it's not attacking Europe itself.
The shit you're trying to fling is not sticking.
10
Upstairs-Inspection3Apr 1, 2026
-8
supporting terrorism in other countries isnt attacking europe?
>The rally was attended **by an estimated 100,000 Iranians and** **hundreds of international dignitaries**. A [**British Member of Parliament**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_of_Parliament_(United_Kingdom)) who attended said **"Had the plot succeeded, it would have been the deadliest terror operation ever carried out in Europe. The US would undeniably have declared war on Iran – and it was only because the plot was foiled, world war three was averted."** [Belgian](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgium) police had been informed of a possible attack on the rally, and **found 550g (1lb 3oz) of explosive and a detonator in the car** of Amir Saadouni and Nasimeh Naami. Saadouni, Naami, Assadi (believed to be the mastermind), and another Iranian went on trial in [Antwerp](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antwerp) on 27 November 2020. Court documents allege that Assadi was ordered by Iranian authorities to smuggle the explosives into Europe on a commercial flight, and give them to Saadouni and Naami, who were arrested two days later.[^(\[37\])](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#cite_note-37)
attacking citizens and international dignitaries of another country is an attacking the country itself
refer to 9/11 for reference
-8
EconomicRegret2Apr 1, 2026
+3
Complicit? Switzerland literally did business with everyone while keeping its military within its borders, and keeping foreign militaries outside its borders. That's the definition of neutrality!
3
Ultra_MetalApr 1, 2026
-51
Switzerland is helping the bad guys again, just like in WW2. They are not neutral. They are on the side of tyranny and terror. I wonder how many of the mullahs have bank accounts in Switzerland with all the stolen Iranian tax money.
-51
PositivelyAcademicalApr 1, 2026
+12
Neutrality has a definition in international law. Just because you don’t like it, doesn’t mean that this isn’t what neutrality looks like.
12
Forsaken1887Apr 1, 2026
+12
Cry about things you started? Typical US behavior. Oh and you have been the bad guys for decades in case you didn’t realize it.
12
Connect-Type493Apr 1, 2026
+22
Trump, Kegsbreath and Co. Are objectively the bigger bad guys now.
22
MostPutridSmellApr 1, 2026
-11
Authentic Listnook big brain opinion right here
-11
matts198715Apr 1, 2026
+14
Do you think maybe the us are the bad guys lately? You know, the illegal wars, the illegal tarrifs on allies, the disrespect and threats of calling Canada the 51st state, threatening to take over Greenland, the kidnapping of a foreign leader, stealing oil revenues from Venezuela and putting the funds in a private offshore account. Not to mention the fucked up domestic issues, ice agents disappearing people, the purchase of concentration camps across america (purchased at massively inflated prices, can't forget to grift at every point possible!), defunding your already failed Healthcare and education system to pay for an illegal war that literally no one except for Isreal wanted.
14
RiceSpecial8446Apr 1, 2026
The US have been the bad guys for a long time.
In this century alone, the estimated death toll of both direct and indirect action by the U.S is around 4.5 million.
>An estimated over 940,000 people were killed by direct post-9/11 war violence in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, and Pakistan between 2001-2023. Of these, more than 432,000 were civilians. The number of people wounded or ill as a result of the conflicts is far higher, as is the number of civilians who died “indirectly,” as a result of the wars’ destruction of economies, healthcare systems, infrastructure and the environment. An estimated 3.6-3.8 million people died indirectly in post-9/11 war zones, bringing the total death toll to at least 4.5-4.7 million and counting.
https://costsofwar.watson.brown.edu/costs/human
0
viperabyssApr 1, 2026
+21
Isn’t denying airspace to US military shows they’re against terror and tyranny?
21
Ultra_MetalApr 1, 2026
-19
No, because the US does not carry out terrorism and Trump is not a tyrant (he may want to be one but he isn't one because we have a democracy with checks and balances that has limited his power).
-19
navorApr 1, 2026
+9
Oof, someone should help this guy out and by the way, did you misspell your name? Looks like there’s an “n” missing.
9
juliohernanzApr 1, 2026
+1
I thought exactly the same.
1
otisticRetard52Apr 1, 2026
+15
>US does not carry out terrorism
Uhmmm i have news for you
15
Ellisville15Apr 1, 2026
+9
Trump is literally a tyrant
9
juliohernanzApr 1, 2026
+4
Probably he's the best definition of a tyrant.
4
Ultra_MetalApr 1, 2026
-5
No, he's just a wannabe tyrant. The military has refused his illegal orders and the courts have struck down many of his policies. That doesn't happen to tyrants.
-5
ryan30zApr 1, 2026
+5
> The military has refused his illegal orders
Except for those times they kept double tapping those boats.
>Trump is not a tyrant
He just gave two executive orders which blatantly violate the US constitution.
>the courts have struck down many of his policies. That doesn't happen to tyrants.
The supreme court ruled he can do whatever he likes and not be held criminally liable.
These are pretty much the dictionary definition of a tyrant.
5
Ultra_MetalApr 1, 2026
-2
Not really. You have no clue what you're talking about. If he was a tyrant, you wouldn't even be allowed to make that comment without the FBI being sent to arrest you. You don't know what tyranny means.
Last weekend I saw a huge anti-Trump protest near my home and nobody got arrested. Obviously he's not a tyrant, otherwise protests like that would be illegal and people would get arrested.
-2
ryan30zApr 1, 2026
+5
> you wouldn't even be allowed to make that comment without the FBI being sent to arrest you.
You know not everyone who speaks English is American right? It's kind of in the name.
The rest of this comment is just 'nuh uh'. Enjoy living in an increasingly despotic shithole.
5
Ultra_MetalApr 1, 2026
You have no clue what you're talking about. Your comments are 100% nonsense.
0
LovelyDayHereApr 1, 2026
+1
> The military has refused his illegal orders and the courts have struck down many of his policies.
>That doesn't happen to tyrants.
It actually does, right before the people who refuse are dismissed (or worse) and the court judges replaced with those in the tyrant's favor.
1
Ultra_MetalApr 1, 2026
+1
Trump has lost in court many times including with judges he himself appointed.
1
Forsaken1887Apr 1, 2026
+4
Oh right, when it comes to US it’s democracy, not terrorism. Yeah, tell that to all the countries you invaded or destabilized in order to achieve your imperialistic goals..
4
BrexitHangoverApr 1, 2026
+1
Your Gestapo, I mean ICE kills your people in broad daylight, and you are talking about checks and balances? Try again.
1
ryan30zApr 1, 2026
+5
Thank god we've got an American to swoop in and explain the situation for everyone. Thank you for your service.
5
NormalSocietyApr 1, 2026
Amerisplaining
0
EconomicRegret2Apr 1, 2026
+1
Look up the definition of neutrality before spouting your ignorance.
1
BrexitHangoverApr 1, 2026
+1
You finally entered the find out phase. Good for you. Your rapist in charge already announed the US will retreat with their tails between their legs once more soon.
1
leeekslapApr 1, 2026
-4
Good for Sweden this boondoggle is brought to you by chimps. They like pedo rapists.
112 Comments