· 114 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 8, 2026 at 11:55 PM

Newly created Polymarket accounts bet big on US-Iran ceasefire in hours before Trump's announcement

Posted by lurkity_mclurkington


Newly created Polymarket accounts bet big on US-Iran ceasefire in hours before Trump's announcement
AP News
Newly created Polymarket accounts bet big on US-Iran ceasefire in hours before Trump's announcement
A group of new accounts on the prediction market Polymarket made highly specific, well-timed bets on whether the U.S. and Iran would reach a ceasefire on April 7, resulting in hundreds of thousands of dollars in profits for those users.

🚩 Report this post

114 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
dtoddh 2 days ago +1220
Don Jr is a board member.
1220
plefe 1 day ago +308
He is also a board member for Kalshi.
308
JuneButIHateSummer 1 day ago +312
I just had to look this up and yes, the President's son is a board member of Polymarket. He is also a "strategic advisor" to Kalshi. Jesus. F******. Christ. Our lives are a game to them. edit: typo
312
ruat_caelum 1 day ago +29
Can we say "french solution?" or is that not allowed?
29
JuneButIHateSummer 1 day ago +12
Yeah, it's insane that our only remaining solution is heavily monitored and outlawed. I've been voting, I will continue to vote (if possible), but it's not realistic.
12
Pitamo 1 day ago +10
The French (dis)Connection.
10
silverado6314 1 day ago +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
saulsa_ 1 day ago +37
They like to have some diversity when it comes to grifting.
37
Schuben 1 day ago +9
"Oh, we got *both* kinds of ~~music~~ bet scamming! ~~Country~~ Kalshi *and* ~~Western~~ Polymarket!"
9
Beard_o_Bees 1 day ago +5
> Our lives are a game to them. I like to think that one day their lives will be our entertainment - so I guess we're sort of on the same page. Of course, i'm imagining something that feels more like *The Running Man*.
5
Key-Incident6020 1 day ago +2
So then if it’s a game to them, can’t we defend ourselves and take the fight to them? Rise up and mob out. They do have security…but they can’t stop all of us.
2
Acceptable-Bus-2017 1 day ago -2
Where's Hunter?
-2
JuneButIHateSummer 1 day ago +1
at ya mama house
1
LikeAPwny 1 day ago +17
These people have no soul.
17
theuncleiroh 1 day ago +2
Which means certain things are not to be prohibited. We don't farm humans, for example, but we do it to animals, and it's widely believed to be justified so long as it's not cruel. Take that as you will
2
RespectTheTree 1 day ago +10
Don Jr has a debilitating cocaine addiction and needs the money. Maybe Hunter can toss him an 8 ball so we don't have to deal with his grifting as often.
10
JerryGetAJob 1 day ago +1
He’s not only the president. He’s also a client.
1
Competitive-Ad-9404 2 days ago +236
Donald Trump Jrs company 1789 Capital made a large investment in Polymarkets.  He is also on the board.  And the Trump Administration is suing states for attempting to regulate these prediction markets, even though many other countries ban them altogether. 
236
Ulysses1978ii 1 day ago +15
They really are some of the worst.
15
KindofCrazyScientist 2 days ago +1216
We should probably just ban prediction markets completely, but failing that, there should at least be a strict law against any war-related predictions on them.
1216
Kaffe-Mumriken 2 days ago +316
Yeah it’s f****** stupid. It’s like allowing people who can pic up and place the goddamn r******* ball wherever they want to make hidden bets at the table.
316
v2Occy 1 day ago +13
Wouldn’t work if other people weren’t also betting.
13
TurelSun 1 day ago +10
Which is why it should be banned or made illegal. If the solution is to expect people to just "stop" then you've already lost.
10
MaybeTheDoctor 2 days ago +101
And maybe accounts and bets should be subject to ID verification.
101
yamirzmmdx 2 days ago +138
Nah. We only need IDs for that p***. And groceries apparently.
138
WoolooOfWallStreet 2 days ago +42
And for watching YouTube, and for discord, and other stuff that it wasn’t an issue until very recently but what basically amounts to insider trading? Fair game! >!/s!<
42
JustGottaKeepTrying 1 day ago +4
And, for some reason, shoveling snow in New York...of all their ID claims, that one is baffling.
4
Krillin113 1 day ago +2
Wait they don’t have KYC? Lmao, that sounds like fraud central 101
2
blankarage 2 days ago +46
guess who’s an investor in polymarket / kalshi
46
Rakastaakissa 2 days ago +37
I guess Don Jr! Or is it Kushner?
37
blankarage 2 days ago +28
don Fing jr is investor in both, that motherfcuker
28
Almainyny 1 day ago +7
Bet you the big guy gets a percentage.
7
hagela 2 days ago +24
People who are betting on those sites are just giving their money to the insiders. I'd like to think the reasonable folks will just bet on other topics and everyone else will go broke.
24
MisterProfGuy 1 day ago +12
It's absolutely a stupidity tax, but we need to at least crack down on their marketing. I'm so sick of the news reporting the odds market like it has any ability to predict the future. It's not a prediction market, it's gambling. People aren't making rational decisions and it's rigged all kinds of ways.
12
nicoco3890 1 day ago +2
It has ability to predict the future *because* it’s all insider trading. A lot of people do gamble, that’s how the liquidity is produced, but for any smart people or third party observer, you should be looking out for any big money movement made by insider and then act on it outside of the platform. The insider trading is the point. Either it’s all gambling or a way to gain knowledge based on insider trading. It can’t be both at the same time.
2
AlexHoneyBee 2 days ago +10
I think it’s time we start betting whether or not prediction markets become regulated.
10
ImpressiveAmount4684 1 day ago +2
The polymarket agency is actively suing states that attempt regulation lol CFTC Sues Trio of States to Reaffirm its Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Prediction Markets https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9206-26
2
Novelty-Accnt 1 day ago +7
We should also stop using the mealy-mouthed marketing term "prediction market" and go back to calling it gambling. Give it back that slightly unsavory connotations.
7
TheKingInTheNorth 2 days ago +8
Options on tickers like $BNO or $USO are basically the same for market-moving geopolitical events.
8
overcatastrophe 2 days ago +4
And public policy.
4
Chiron17 2 days ago +3
I mean, your Congressional representatives seem to get to trade with insider information
3
Anthraxious 2 days ago +2
And how do you define "war related" when the entire market moves exactly because of it? All these f****** "markets" are made to make rich people richer to begin with. Nothing else.
2
olivebars 1 day ago +2
That doesn’t really make sense, it’s like saying make p*** sites adult only, you’re not regulating some gambling site hosted in malta
2
FuzzyEmployment5397 1 day ago +2
I actually have to disagree here Idiots who participate deserve to lose money
2
crazyrich 1 day ago +1
Ok, but hear me out, do we want the people fleecing them to be GETTING that money?
1
RedditsBadForMentalH 2 days ago +1
I agree, let’s do it. (Wait, how do we ban it?)
1
Ok-Energy6846 1 day ago +1
An outright ban is the answer
1
Squire_II 1 day ago +1
Not only are we not banning them, but courts are ruling in their favor that states can't regulate them as the gambling platforms they are.
1
lII1lIIl1IIll1Il11l 2 days ago -11
it's already banned in the us
-11
Successful-Medicine9 2 days ago +10
Clearly it isn't.
10
lII1lIIl1IIll1Il11l 2 days ago -12
yes it is, you litterally are not wllowed to place bets on lit lmao
-12
Thief_of_Sanity 1 day ago +1
What? Yeah you can.
1
lII1lIIl1IIll1Il11l 1 day ago +1
no you can't
1
EmergencyGrocery3238 2 days ago -17
Oh my sweet summer child
-17
GetsBetterAfterAFew 2 days ago -12
As far as I know these Polymarket isnt technically operating in the USA they do have a NYC based office, so assuming youre in the USA, how exactly do we ban them and at this point theyre operating at a net benefit for USA govt, ie this fuckin article?
-12
KindofCrazyScientist 2 days ago +18
The same way it was before. The [Wikipedia article](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymarket) on Polymarket says: "Polymarket blocked access to United States customers from 2022 to December 2, 2025, following a settlement with the [Commodity Futures Trading Commission](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_Futures_Trading_Commission), which accused the company of running an unregistered derivatives-trading platform." So we could go back to that again.
18
ImperfectDrug 2 days ago +11
Kalshi is the same thing and Polymarket is surely trying to get legalized in the US as soon as possible. 
11
LardLad00 2 days ago +3
If you ban them you can make getting payouts very difficult.
3
ZZ9ZA 2 days ago +3
And much like they killed the p**** sites, make getting money IN a pain.
3
AudibleNod 2 days ago +282
It is the Administration's position this is NOT gambling.
282
Awkwardischarge 2 days ago +73
It's a futures contract with a 1 hour lifetime.
73
CoughRock 2 days ago +10
perhaps this how they plan to reduce the national deficit. Just keep insider trade until the budget hole is fill.
10
Spire_Citron 2 days ago +15
Nah, it's all going straight into their own pockets.
15
byerss 2 days ago +36
Correct. Gambling has to do with chance.  This is insider trading. 
36
awfulconcoction 2 days ago +34
Well I suppose it's not gambling when you have inside information.
34
aradraugfea 2 days ago +18
It's only gambling if there's a chance you lose.
18
Moneyshot_ITF 2 days ago +8
Trump Jr is on the Kalshi board
8
ShareGlittering1502 2 days ago +55
30k bets when people are doing $100m bets on oil
55
ksgt69 2 days ago +72
It's not just this, there was a bet that trump would praise Allah on Easter that paid big, there was a bet that a press briefing would be longer than 90 minutes and it was abruptly ended at 89 minutes. They are manipulating the polumarkets and more.
72
nowahhh 1 day ago +15
That first one [isn't true.](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-claim-polymarket-user-221200523.html)
15
Not_Legal_Advice_Pod 2 days ago +65
It wasn't terribly controversial that Trump would announce a cease fire.   The party that was unlikely is that both sides would genuinely be in agreement as to terms.
65
chainer3000 2 days ago +10
You think it’s a coincidence Iran is asking for the toll payment in crypto?
10
Direct_Witness1248 2 days ago +12
Using cryptocurrency to get around sanctions is nothing new
12
zoned_off 1 day ago +1
Yeah this is a dumb one. There are way sketchier trades before out of the blue Trump tweets. This one had a telegraphed date and time where 1 of 2 things was going to happen at a specific time, of course people are going to bet on it.  Edit: to be clear, the article points out the same thing I'm saying here. The dumb part is the reaction here acting like this is the big story when the prior ones were way sketchier. 
1
dpezpoopsies 2 days ago
Yeah I tend to agree. I'm not at all disbelieving of there being market manipulation going on, but this particular data point might not be such a smoking gun. Trump was going to TACO and we pretty much all knew it. If I was a betting man, I'd easily have put money down predicting some kind of walk back by the US.
0
crapbag29 2 days ago +17
This should be illegal. How gross are we as a civilization? Not that that is civilized behavior.
17
herrcollin 2 days ago +9
Not civilization. Country. America is doing this, mostly to Americans that they have addicted to gambling.
9
H0vis 1 day ago +3
Yeah the gambling industry now powered by phone apps is an absolute behemoth. Exponential growth.
3
Kewkky 2 days ago +31
Besides the obvious insider trading and all the idiots wasting their money on Polymarket bets by giving it all to millionaire government officials in hiding, betting on a peace deal was pretty obvious. Trump was posturing a little too much, and JD Vance didn't know about what was happening. No way would the VP actually not know when Trump and Hegseth will be "destroying an entire civilization, never to be brought back".
31
blackcatpandora 2 days ago +10
Ah, well, in that case- I trust you are enjoying your newly found millions!
10
Drostan_S 2 days ago +16
I am convinced that Donald Trump himself is betting on these things and then immediately issuing orders based on his bets.  It's almost the only way to explain the sheer buttfucking insanity of the last few months. Trump sees a high payout bet that he's the decision maker for,  bets huge,  and wins huge. He's so demented that he lacks literally any self-control
16
teddykaygeebee 2 days ago +9
This is insane and basically real-life squid games.
9
DirtDevil1337 2 days ago +6
Not suspicious at all...
6
BacktotheUniverse 2 days ago +6
It's free money if you know the right people.
6
CardinalM1 2 days ago +6
Who takes the opposite side of that bet? Why would anyone bet on this prop unless they were an insider?
6
fsactual 1 day ago +7
If you wanted to launder payments to the insider I can’t think of a better way.
7
Professional_Bat9174 1 day ago +2
A good portion of people are acting on knowledge, some probabky on partial knowledge(i.e. "Suckers"), and then a wide range of gambling addicts(or those on their way to it)
2
colonelsmoothie 1 day ago +1
Just as in regular securities markets, suckers. To quote one [hedge fund manager](https://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/oct/18/banking-useconomy): >"All of this behaviour supporting the aristocracy only ended up making it easier for me to find people stupid enough to take the other side of my trades. God bless America." But to be fair, the people who won during the GFC got lucky with their timing. They could have lost it all if the bubble held on for a bit longer.
1
virtual_adam 2 days ago +4
>there were few signals that a ceasefire deal was imminent Not true at all. By 3:30ish the nasdaq went from -2% early in the day to positive. This article as far as I can tell is talking about bets that happened later. During CNBCs 5 o clock show Fast Money which has a recording on all podcast platforms , 1.5 hours before the announcement, all of the show members mentioned he that the stocks going way up meant there was 100% going to be a deal before 8 Unlike the beginning of the war that was obviously insiders, this taco was expected by everyone
4
AquiliferX 1 day ago +4
We NEED to shut this down the moment we get the chance
4
winter32842 1 day ago +4
I don’t know why anyone would bet on polymarket when insiders know the outcome and can bet perfectly screwing little people.
4
Rattus_NorvegicUwUs 1 day ago +5
F****** just seize all their assets. I’m so tired of these elites acting like they are better than us. Set their net worth to $0 and watch them struggle to survive in the world they ruined.
5
NotGreatNot_Terrible 1 day ago +6
The second Donald Trump is out of office I really hope this rigged bullshit is prosecuted to the full extent of the law. This is leaps and bounds worse than anything Hunter Biden did and they wouldn’t shut the f*** up about him.
6
FluFlammin9000 2 days ago +3
I saw a post a week or two ago talking about how a fuckload of money in bets was thrown down on polymarket in favor of a ceasefire being announced by early April, was pretty obvious there was insider trading going on. Tried to throw some money down myself after seeing that as the odds were f****** crazy at the time but found out people in the US can't bet on polymarket and I didn't feel like jumping through whatever hoops were necessary to do so.
3
jsta19 2 days ago +3
I’m confused on where the payouts come from. Is polymarket itself like the c*****/house that has to pay?
3
eposseeker 2 days ago +3
I believe it's self-balancing bets. You bet whether option A  B or C happens. If you voted A and A happened, you and the other people who voted A split the money lost by the B and C voters.  If I'm very very wrong, please correct me.
3
daHaus 1 day ago +3
I don't believe for a second that the US treasury doesn't know who is benefiting from all this, the secret service knows The question is, what are they going to do about it?
3
danieldeceuster 2 days ago +2
Every sucker betting on an outcome other bettors control deserves to lose every last penny.
2
PerAsperaAdAstra1701 2 days ago +2
This is basically a scam site ...
2
Ripraz 2 days ago +2
I hope the site will blow making lot of people straight out poor 
2
v2Occy 1 day ago +2
What’s nice about this is only the gamblers are getting fucked over.
2
Worldly_Anybody_9219 1 day ago +2
Every time something scummy comes up in the news, Polymarket is involved.
2
mcpat21 1 day ago +2
This just feels like a new form of money laundering
2
Chili-Lime-Chihuahua 1 day ago +2
Trump is very old. It will be interesting to see if they try to monetize his death. I mean besides all the tacky memorabilia they will sell. 
2
Ancient_Sun_2061 2 days ago +1
Chump change , not the admin but just some regards
1
Oplopanax_horridus 1 day ago +1
The writing was on the wall, though. If I had a truckload of money I would have placed a sizable bet on the same thing since the big orange turd made his ridiculous threat. Don’t get me wrong, everyone involved with this admin is absolutely corrupt, and I fervently hope they face justice for their crimes and complicity.
1
toaster661 1 day ago +1
You were worried about insider trading. They just realized they can create the bet and make money on it at the same time.
1
Syring 1 day ago +1
Why are they not being investigated by the SEC or other entities?
1
Zapdroid 1 day ago +1
Yes this is bad, but it’s only affecting degenerate gamblers so I can’t really bring myself to care.
1
TwoLegitShiznit 1 day ago +1
That sucks, but it's like the guys putting all their money into the seedy card game in Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. When you play degenerate games with other degenerates in a degenerate venue, don't be surprised when it's not on the level.
1
doomeddeath 1 day ago +1
They just do it openly and don't care about anything. It's truly disgusting but here we are, USA 2026
1
funtimes-forall 1 day ago +1
Presidential insider trading is the new normal. Everyone understands that.
1
mass_mike47 1 day ago -1
Not gonna lie, if I had an account I would’ve bet big too. Taco Tuesday?
-1
androidfig 2 days ago -7
I don't care about this because it's not my tax $ directly funding it. I do care about all the tax $ being funnelled into bullshit private accounts.
-7
← Back to Board