· 23 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 22, 2026 at 5:17 AM

Non‑Iranian traffic through Hormuz hits post‑war high as dark transits surge

Posted by MARTINELECA



🚩 Report this post

23 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
clamorous_owle Apr 22, 2026 +79
The term "post-war" misleadingly implies that the war is over.
79
imaginary_num6er Apr 22, 2026 +9
Well the war hasn’t started again yet /s
9
Glanea Apr 22, 2026 +50
So according to this article, it was....three ships? The word surge there is doing some very heavy lifting
50
Stellewind Apr 22, 2026 +12
3 ships is a 50% surge from 2 ships!
12
Round-Outcome6491 Apr 23, 2026 +1
At this daily rate next year enough ships will transit hormuz to change the spin of the earth
1
Northern_Ice_2501 Apr 22, 2026 +6
I couldn't get past the paywall but scrolled down. Saw another headline under related content, there was 26 Iranian ships (dated April 20th)
6
Darkstar197 Apr 23, 2026 +2
3 ships is infinitely more than zero I guess.
2
Goodie__ Apr 22, 2026 +4
Anything to justify the current bull market.
4
The_Frostweaver Apr 22, 2026 +6
So ships have started turning off their lights and transponders and running Iran's blockade at night? Does this mean rumors of mines were overstated or there is just a lot of water and these ships happened to get lucky?
6
redfoobar Apr 22, 2026 +5
They could have been hugging the coast of Oman like the cruise ships did if they are not running deep. In the end it doesn’t even matter if the straight is mined or not: no insurer will allow doing this with a big full oil tanker so it won’t make a significant difference in the situation.
5
AromaticMacaron7925 Apr 22, 2026 +2
The point of the mines is not that they are 'everywhere' it's that they could be 'anywhere'. Iran's real threat are the drones, the mines are just icing on the cake. That's not to say Iran could not deploy MORE mines if they wanted to, they have a huge stockpile. The problem with doing that is they can still accomplish their goals with a small amount and make their enemies spend more time searching for the ones that ARE out there. Also it was three ships.
2
ScopeLogic Apr 22, 2026 +19
Surge? Really? We are back to this langauge... 
19
EltonBeans Apr 22, 2026 +5
"surge"
5
WeakTransportation37 Apr 22, 2026 +5
The paper doesn’t seem to understand the meaning of “post-war”
5
FavoriteConsequence Apr 22, 2026 +7
Ceasefire does not equal “post-war”.
7
Potential-Bee3866 Apr 22, 2026 +2
*except for US traffic.
2
Ok-Seaworthiness4488 Apr 22, 2026 +3
IRGC fired on a cargo carrier with machine gun fire today
3
Round-Outcome6491 Apr 23, 2026 -1
For a cargo ship machine gun fire is not really dangerous
-1
Ok-Seaworthiness4488 Apr 23, 2026 +1
Enough to seize two of them
1
_9a_ Apr 22, 2026 +1
Eh, call me when the shave a parsec off the Kessel Run
1
TailorAncient8283 Apr 22, 2026
dark transition有点搞
0
Ultra_Metal Apr 23, 2026
The fact that non-Iranian ships are going through while Iranian ships are not means the US blockade is working and being enforced while the Islamic Republic cannot enforce its own blockade. This is another sign that the Islamic Republic is losing power and will collapse soon.
0
DFWPunk Apr 23, 2026 +2
Iran seized two ships and stopped a third today.
2
← Back to Board