We had to say dickety because the Kaiser stole our word twenty
77
ShoulderPossible97594 days ago
+16
I love you all
16
Medallicat4 days ago
+10
Are those new slacks?
10
strike-when-ready4 days ago
+3
We only had those big yella ones
3
newfor_20264 days ago
+19
one out of 12 approved styles. if you pick a style that's not on the list, you will be sent to a labor camp
19
ShaneOfan5 days ago
+157
I'm convinced the North Koreans are keeping Godzilla at bay. We'll regret they day that Supreme Leader is no longer here to protect us!
157
sgame235 days ago
+37
Or making new Godzillas
37
puterTDI4 days ago
+12
Supreme leader is Godzilla
12
seanflyon4 days ago
+7
Supreme leader is Pulgasari. North Korea kidnaped a South Korean director and his actress ex-wife and made them make a Godzilla-like movie (among others). They made a movie that was NK propaganda, but at the same time not so subtly critical of the regime.
7
EternalCanadian4 days ago
+6
Hey man, show some class! He’s not that fat!
Godzilla’s pretty slim for his size.
6
Formal_Appearance_165 days ago
+35
They really hate that sea.
35
-drunk_russian-5 days ago
+14
Kim took notes from Caligula.
14
OneTravellingMcDs5 days ago
+9
Using that name, for that body of water, might get it shot at you instead.
9
Melkor155 days ago
+9
Jokes on them, Godzilla will be mad.
9
princesshoran5 days ago
+206
A Spaniard will kill him and then they’ll nuke Ethiopia. Just to show they mean business.
206
phantomjm5 days ago
+41
Would said Spaniard happen to have six fingers on one hand?
41
newfor_20264 days ago
+23
that's INCONCEIVABLE!
23
John1v64 days ago
+7
Fezzig - rip his arms off!
7
bambin05 days ago
+64
That sounds more like the US after 9/11.
64
txkwatch5 days ago
+59
I'm still confused. We fought the taliban for 20 years to put the taliban back in power?
59
ProxyDamage5 days ago
+94
Ok, so it's very simple, let me explain:
A Saudi Arabia funded, and CIA equipped, islamic terrorist group attacked America on 11th of September (11/09/2001) in a mass casualty terror event.
Because of that America invaded Afghanistan, the place that was suspected to be hiding Osama Bin Laden the men responsible for the attacks, to remove the Taliban from power.
This went so well that 2-ish years later the US invaded Iraq to take away their weapons of mass destruction which they absolutely, 100% certainly, beyond a shadow of a doubt, had. This certified information was based on.... vibes, I guess... or something. Who cares about evidence anyway!
Anyways Saddam Hussein was captured and killed within 3 years which is why that war lasted 8 f****** years.
Anyways Afghanistan was doing great this entire. Except for the constant reports of humanitarian abuses, torture and war crimes by the americans. Those were a bit of a bummer. Anyways that shitshow lasted 20 years, during which the US very successfully achieved their main objective: to pump infinity billions of dollars into the american military-industrial complex.
But the war stopped being profitable at some point and they got bored or something so they fucked off, leaving the taliban to instantly retake power.
Does that make sense?
94
txkwatch5 days ago
+30
Thanks for the explanation... Nope. Doesn't make sense.
30
spam__likely4 days ago
+6
Doesn't matter, had profit.
6
Remarkable_Aside13814 days ago
+22
Man, there’s a lot of bad history here.
OBL was already insanely rich, and kicked off his war with the US *and* KSA because KSA declined his offer to have his AAA push back Iraq in 1990, opting instead to have the US-led Coalition handle it instead. This pissed off OBL because he was unhappy that non-Muslim and non-Arabs were in the Holy Land and tasked with its defense. He kicks off a decades-long terror campaign culminating in a second WTC attack. After that, the US asks the Taliban to hand him over, Taliban refuse, and the US invades Afghanistan for knowingly harboring a terror group. OBL flees to Pakistan in December of 2001 and the US spends 20 years attempting to get Afghanistan moderately stable
But OBL wasn’t funded by KSA, it was well known he was in Afghanistan prior to December of 2001, and the CIA never equipped OBL’s AAA during the Soviet-Afghan War, that specific falsehood has been debunked for decades.
Either you’re poorly informed or being intentionally misleading
22
Disastrous-Square9774 days ago
+5
He just reads listnook.
5
Uncle_Rabbit5 days ago
+11
You left out the part where they totally killed Bin Laden but nobody saw it, and then they totally buried him at sea where nobody could find the body.
11
thorofasgard4 days ago
+12
I mean the burial at sea makes sense to prevent his grave being a place to rally around.
12
BackRiverSpook4 days ago
+6
At the end of the first Transformers movie, they bury Megatron at sea, then he comes back in the sequel and fucks all sorts of shit up. America will never learn from its mistakes.
6
Basteir5 days ago
+31
Nah you Yanks fought for 20 years to pump your taxes into your military companies' pockets.
31
Nopementator5 days ago
+92
plot twist: they will nuke themselves.
Nobody expect that. The surprise factor is important.
92
impy6955 days ago
+38
It's unironically a likely scenario
38
bikestuffrockville4 days ago
+4
Yup. I don't think people realize that if they exploded a bomb in their own territory, fallout would rain over Japan. The world's forth largest economy.
4
RSG-ZR25 days ago
+9
Ah yes, the "driving backwards" in a race tactic.
60% of the time, it works every time.
9
SeaworthinessSome4545 days ago
+6
I wouldn’t write it off entirely. Nuking yourself so you can blame it on someone else and then nuke them is entirely within a dictators wheelhouse
6
under_the_c5 days ago
+22
"I'm in danger!" - middle of the ocean
22
POINTLESSUSERNAME0004 days ago
+6
Those poor, poor fish... 😔
6
UlteriorMotive665 days ago
+14
>Prof Lankov added: “I see no likelihood of an attack coming from South Korea so any retaliation would be aimed at the United States.”
14
neverpost45 days ago
+16
The last president of the South Korea was impeached and now in the jail after a failed internal coup.
He has a trial coming where he is accused of sending out drones all the way to North Korean capital and not very secretively so that North Korea will discover and rash out at the South so he can consolidate his power.
Even though he is in jail, he still has up to 30% of die hard supporters, especially in Gyong Ssang region.
16
TiddiesAnonymous5 days ago
+7
That pesky 30%
7
impy6955 days ago
+6
Don't they also say that South Korea is a puppet of the United States?
6
Madbrad2005 days ago
+14
The biggest military threat to NK in event of war would be the US. NK can pummel SK with artillery and make a grueling frontline. It can't do that against the US, hence the need for ballistics and nukes
14
Odd-Masterpiece32225 days ago
+11
The fact they might believe they will exist after and if they do is.. weird.
11
blankarage5 days ago
+20
there’s only one country that has recently kidnapped/assassinated other world leaders
20
AbeVigoda765 days ago
+7
Oh, let’s say Moe.
7
doctorgibson5 days ago
+26
Fire on whom*
26
Spam_Hand5 days ago
+17
On whom will they fire*
17
cantproveidid5 days ago
+9
Apocryphally "This is the sort of bloody nonsense up with which I will not put."
9
Situlacrum5 days ago
+5
Fire on WHO because obviously World's Health Organization has failed to take care of Kim's health.
5
knightress_oxhide5 days ago
+3
kim used me as an object
3
haritos895 days ago
+6
Why the killer of course
6
LaserBeamsCattleProd5 days ago
+2740
Kim wanted a headline so bad. Here you go, little guy.
2740
Conscious_Candle25985 days ago
+606
"Hey guys. I'm still here!"
606
Dimitri3p05 days ago
+124
"I swear, if you do anything mean, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, oh I don't know but I'd be soooooo mad!"
124
Koala_eiO4 days ago
+24
It's so angry, he's about to reset his Minecraft server.
24
MarshyHope5 days ago
+82
He's the shitty kid in class who isn't getting attention so he says he's going to light a desk on fire.
82
Brief_Hospital_17665 days ago
+12
and here's me secretly encouraging him to do it
12
StaysAwakeAllWeek5 days ago
+240
Maduro got abducted. Khamenei got blown to pieces. Putin is hiding underground because of the credible assassination threat he faces daily. Assad is hiding in exile. Trump is publicly discussing which country he wants to attack next after he's done bombing the current one.
It's a scary time to be a dictator.
240
jupiterkansas5 days ago
+102
Trump can't make money by killing Kim.
102
StaysAwakeAllWeek5 days ago
+78
lolwhat is that what you think? All he has to do is short Samsung
78
giboauja4 days ago
+6
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck
6
TheQuadropheniac5 days ago
+15
North Korea is sitting on top of literally trillions of dollars worth of resources and minerals. There is absolutely money to be made by toppling North Korea's current government.
15
jupiterkansas5 days ago
+39
as if China would let us just go in and take it. Much easier to pick on Venezuela, Iran, and Greenland.
39
RealisticEntity4 days ago
+12
>Iran
I wonder how that's turning out...
12
heidly_ees4 days ago
+3
But he *can* makes headlines which almost feels like more of a motivator at the moment for him
3
jupiterkansas4 days ago
+4
Sad that "Trump spews nonsense" is still a headline.
4
AnOnlineHandle5 days ago
+43
It's a scary time to be anybody not just dictators, Trump has repeatedly talked about annexing Canada and Greenland, and fortunately seems a bit distracted right now.
43
Old_Ladies5 days ago
+33
And panama and Cuba and threatening to invading Colombia and actually raiding Venezuela and now Iran. Oh and blowing up random boats mostly likey not drug boats.
33
francis25595 days ago
+25
Yes but like… who is pressuring them at this point. Most of your cases are Trump being a wacko, and Trump seems to love Kim and Putin.
Putin is at risk because of a war with Ukraine that Putin started, and not at risk from the United States.
As long as Kim stays at home, I think he’s fine.
25
StaysAwakeAllWeek5 days ago
+7
Kim is going to (try to) be dictator for another half century, not just a four year term. He's watching the world destabilise and fearing for his future. I'd say this is an entirely rational response
7
ArtsyBread5 days ago
+17
Who the hell is insane enough to try a decapitation strike on Russia, a country where if even 10% of their nukes still work it'll be enough to blow millions of people into dust? That'd be even dumber than killing Khamenei just for Khamenei 2.0 to take over.
17
Bassman2335 days ago
+32
Insiders. People who want to take his place.
32
Haplo123455 days ago
+9
Ukraine is literally at war with Russia right now, in case you haven't heard. If one of their drones ends up killing Putin, I think they'd celebrate. Most other people in power also know, like Putin knows, that using a nuclear weapon would mean the end of Russia as a country and certainly the end of their (relatively) nice, cushy life.
9
ABoutDeSouffle5 days ago
+5
Not Ukraine. They do psyops to mess with Putin's mind and disturb the Russian population, but I doubt they'd dare striking the Russian leadership.
Only chance would be from inside in the context of a coup.
5
BroLil5 days ago
+8
He’s not little, he’s very tall horizontally.
8
Blando-Cartesian5 days ago
+8
Poor Kim Jong Un. Third generation Kim being the world’s foremost WTF dictator and he gets surpassed by an American.
8
RoseCityHooligan5 days ago
+4
He used to be one of only a few batshit crazy dictators but now they’re a dime a dozen. What a trendsetter.
4
DarthRiznat5 days ago
+2014
Hmm, ok. But will it be pointy?
2014
Mgreen192955 days ago
+714
It will be Aladeen
714
general_adm_aladdeen5 days ago
+165
Hope you don't mind if I chime in :)
165
PM_THE_REAPER5 days ago
+110
Aladeen!!!
110
thejourneybegins425 days ago
+78
Is that aladeen or aladeen?
78
AscendedViking75 days ago
+87
I'm afraid you are HIV Aladeen
87
Angry_Zarathustra5 days ago
+66
:) :( :) :(
66
DharmaBird5 days ago
+31
This is very... Aladeen :(
31
pvprazor25 days ago
+32
Nuclear Nadal died for this
32
NoReIevancy5 days ago
+40
If it is round it will simply bounce back
40
P-l-Staker4 days ago
+3
Our enemies would laugh at us! They will think it's a giant d**** coming their way!
3
classicnikk5 days ago
+24
I think what you’re referring to was seen in a cartoon
24
cynicism_is_awesome5 days ago
+11
Bo-Bie? The man with the enormous arms?
11
SouthTippBass5 days ago
+47
The shape of the missle has nothing to do with aerodynamics, it's about the payload delivery.
47
SpiritAnimal015 days ago
+72
But pointy is scary while round is funny and your adviseries would laugh at you.
72
whiterice_3435 days ago
+41
Listen, indulge me for a moment and pretend I’m an idiot
41
SouthTippBass5 days ago
+48
Ok, I'm there.
48
CptJacksp5 days ago
+20
You know what, lets just agree to disagree
20
Electrical_Iron_11615 days ago
+22
No it sticks in the ground and then kaboom
22
theTexans5 days ago
+23
It will be for peaceful medical purposes
23
benenstein5 days ago
+624
Awwww, someone just wants to be noticed.
624
Single-Road-31585 days ago
+78
His normal missile launches aren't getting attention lately.
78
SwimmingSpell80055 days ago
+63
Well ya, he’s was everyone’s favorite maniacal fat little man. But since Trump came into the spotlight, everyone’s all but forgot poor Kim. I won’t, he’ll always be my OG temper tantrum dictator.
63
DrAstralis5 days ago
+16
This is exactly what I thought XD, everyone else's leaders have become so crazy in the past year that Kim's feeling left out lol.
16
RarelyReadReplies5 days ago
+9
Why do we even still upvote this c***? Don't we have too many *actual* problems to worry about nowadays?
9
yubsnubs5 days ago
+639
He wants to be the main character so bad but isn't even in a supporting role.
639
292731625 days ago
+189
His arc kinda got dropped in the past couple seasons. I guess they bring him back once the main plot loses momentum.
189
Kellar215 days ago
+61
His arc got dropped because after he got real nuclear weapons, the plotline planned for him kind of derailed.
Now, the US will leave NK alone.
Frankly, this and what happened after completely discredited any kind of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons as a security policy.
The rule that the only real safety your country can have is having nuclear weapons now doesn't have even the illusion of international stability and respect for treaties and agreements it had before.
61
KennyMoose324 days ago
+27
I bet Ukraine wish it didn’t give up its nuclear weapons in the 90s for a “security assurances”
I don’t like nuclear weapons but I cannot argue against them anymore. No country that has nukes has ever been invaded or conquered.
It’s why Saddam wanted them too.
27
Kellar214 days ago
+8
Ukraine couldn't even use those nuclear weapons, that's one of the main reasons they gave them up.
The missiles were there, but only Russia had the control codes for launching. Ukraine would have had to disassemble the missiles and place the warheads in new ones to actually use them.
But yeah, it seems most treaties aren't worth the paper they are written on.
8
Mike76765 days ago
+8
Nah, I think he's stage hand material at this point.
8
MysticDeath8555 days ago
+6
Let me just say, as a reader of the novel, you are in for a huge surprise and one of the biggest twists in any form of media that you will ever see.
6
KCMmmmm5 days ago
+4
Honestly some of the best villains are the ones that take a break for an arc or two and cook in the shadows.
4
Loki-L5 days ago
+160
Since any launch of nuclear weapons would result in catastrophic reprisals, this would require whoever launched the nukes to have more loyalty to a dead guy than to whoever succeeds him or to his own will to live.
160
DarkShadowEmi5 days ago
+105
Have you hear about the guys bombing themselves for an imaginary dude?
Same logic
105
tellsyoutogetfucked5 days ago
+36
His successor won't be willing to commit suicide just as he gets power. The reality of North Korean high society is a lot different than the masses. Most of them have been to the west and are very well aware of the state they are in on the global scale.
36
DownvoteEvangelist4 days ago
+4
I think your argument has too much rationality in it...
4
TLKv35 days ago
+15
Didn't he *just* name his daughter as his successor (obviously)?
Why would he order nukes launched if he dies only to guarantee his own daughter gets obliterated too? Why would she hear this and not think "huh, he doesn't give a f*** about me does he? Maybe I should just get rid of him, take command instantly and not y'know... f****** die horribly."
15
MrAnyone3 days ago
+3
I'm sending this just to add more information, the successor thing came from South Korean spies, even the girl's reported name—Kim Ju Ae—has never officially been confirmed.
When it comes to NK, we literally don't know unfortunately, so it is super hard to make predictions.
3
TheGreatMightyLeffe5 days ago
+4
On the other hand, a deterrent is only effective as long as you're actually willing to back the threat, otherwise you get invaded the second your bluff is called.
4
Objective_Mousse72165 days ago
+211
So if Ruzzia falls out with Kim, makes it look like Ukraine or European spies assassinated him?
211
Heizard5 days ago
+86
We have bigger chance of Putin dying of ligma and one of his fascists in his circles takes the power - they all advocating for preemptive nuking of Europe.
86
Redditforgoit5 days ago
+31
Don't they routinely play Good Cop Bad Cop, Putin being the voice of reason, as a charade?
31
Heizard5 days ago
+13
Nah... He is just religious fascist, that's why nuking people like that is bad - that's literally his whole reasoning to not do it, otherwise he is not better than his cronies.
13
iTzzSunara5 days ago
+8
Too bad France and the UK have second strike capabilities...
8
Calandrind5 days ago
+6
This was my first question… wouldn’t bad actors abuse this? Possibly easier than building a nuke yourself or a way to avoid responsibility for launching one.
6
NoPerformance48305 days ago
+12
i imagine that kinda stuff is exactly what they are thinking about?
essentially if in this case europe gets nuked then they aren't gonna sit back plus if their own intelligence finds out who actually did it they will also go crazy, which would pretty much start a chain reaction with billions dead
so it's in everyone, ally's or enemy's best interest to not do anything like this
12
ThePlasticSturgeons5 days ago
+27
What about Kourtney, Kendall, Khloe, or Kylie? Do they not care about them too?
27
TheTelegraph5 days ago
+74
**From The Telegraph:**
North Korea has changed its constitution so its military is required to launch a retaliatory nuclear strike if Kim Jong-un is assassinated by a foreign adversary.
The change was made after Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, and many of his closest advisers were killed in strikes at the start of the joint US-Israeli attacks against the regime in Tehran.
The revision was adopted at the first session of the 15th Supreme People’s Assembly, which opened on March 22 in Pyongyang. It was made public on Thursday in a briefing to senior members of the South Korean government by its National Intelligence Service (NIS).
According to the NIS briefing, Kim has command of the North’s nuclear forces, but the changes codify procedures for retaliatory attacks in the event that he is incapacitated or killed.
The revised Article 3 of the nuclear policy law states: “If the command-and-control system over the state’s nuclear forces is placed in danger by hostile forces’ attacks ... a nuclear strike shall be launched automatically and immediately.”
Prof Andrei Lankov, a Russian-born professor of history and international relations at Kookmin University in Seoul, said: “This may have been policy before, but it has added emphasis now it has been enshrined in the constitution.
“Iran was the wake-up call. North Korea saw the remarkable efficiency of the US-Israeli decapitation attacks, which immediately eliminated the greater part of the Iranian leadership, and they must now be terrified.”
An attack designed to eliminate Kim and his immediate circle would be far harder to carry out than the attacks in Iran.
**More here:** [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/05/08/north-korean-nuclear-retaliation-if-kim-jong-un-killed/](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/05/08/north-korean-nuclear-retaliation-if-kim-jong-un-killed/?WT.mc_id=tmgoff_listnook_if-kim-jong-un-killed/&accesscontrol=facebookchannel_open)
74
jared__5 days ago
+65
and what happens if he is assassinated from within?
65
Randalor5 days ago
+41
"Very unfortunate, Glorious Leader suffered a tragic accident where he repeatedly fell on a knife, despite his personal guards best attempts to repeatedly help him to his feet. His daughter, putting on a brave face, said that the time for mourning relics of the past has passed, and she will lead us into a glorious golden future."
41
MobiusNaked5 days ago
+15
‘His daughter, whilst washing red from her hands’. FIFY
15
KoyoyomiAragi5 days ago
+40
To shreds you say
40
Personal_Comb_67455 days ago
+8
"Well guys, you heard the man." - nuke engineers launching the missile straight up into the air so that it falls back down at the exact same spot
8
2bb4llRG5 days ago
+6
Mass crying in the plaza, obligated of course
6
Any-Elderberry-78125 days ago
+6
Evil supreme sister has successfully taken over.
6
a1usiv5 days ago
+21
The US abducted Maduro and took out pretty much all top Iranian leaders this year in surprise operations. Of course the North Korean regime is paranoid. Listnook laughs as if this is a ploy for attention, which it may partly be, but ignores the genuine threat here. Trump's decisions have predictably made certain countries like North Korea more defensive and potentially dangerous. North Korea just announced they're also building more artillery to have aimed at Seoul, which alone could cause an unstoppable bloodbath.
21
ThinkBlue874 days ago
+3
But NK doesn't have any oil
3
ThatGenericName25 days ago
+14
Ok this is actually a lot more reasonably than the first glance at the headline.
The US (and also Russia’s attempt on Zelensky towards the start of the invasion) has showed that they will go directly for the head of state on an attempt to decapitate the enemy, so having a nuclear response be constitutionally required in such an event would be an additional layer of deterrence.
14
ShoulderPast24335 days ago
+10
Okay - we may not like it, but it seems fair.
This is why nukes are game changer.
10
Ilmeury835 days ago
+75
More clown stuff from clown countries, as usual
75
johnwilkonsons4 days ago
+5
This is pretty standard stuff for nuclear doctrine actually
It dissuades adversaries from thinking a decapitation strike followed by a nuclear or conventional attack will prevent (nuclear) retaliation
5
FloridianRobot5 days ago
+32
The USA, Russia and NK doing a lot of work in this department.
32
steve_ample5 days ago
+23
Ah, I was wondering when Dr. Strangelove's doomsday device plan was going to be invoked IRL.
23
morbid_loki5 days ago
+35
No one talks about North Korea. You keep pushing yourselves into the spotlight with absurd statements and acting like, "Everyone's bullying us—you'll see!"
We don't even think about you, at all!
35
matthieuC5 days ago
+16
Someone is feeling ignored by the media
16
94470445 days ago
+30
I picture the American Dad scene where Roger gets really beat up. Slowly pulls out a pistol, and shoots his own foot off lol.
30
ShoulderPast24335 days ago
+14
At whom?
14
DERPYBASTARD5 days ago
+13
At the ocean like usual. They f****** hate the ocean
13
Jo_the_Hastur5 days ago
+9
Inb4 north korean actually been at war with atlantis for decades and is the only reason they don’t invade the land yet
9
Friendly_Soil66175 days ago
+77
so he’s afraid. good
77
Nyoka_ya_Mpembe5 days ago
+81
The only thing he's afraid of is lack of attention.
81
Promen-ade5 days ago
+14
how can you blame north korea for putting this out there after Iran.
14
JiveChicken005 days ago
+5
Into the ocean, like all the others?
5
LurkHereLurkThere4 days ago
+7
And if it's a home grown attacker?
7
_Land_Rover_Series_35 days ago
+16
“uwu notice me 🥺👉👈”
\- Kim Jong-un, at some point, probably
16
Adorable_Salt_71455 days ago
+27
a dictatorial country will fire nukes when the dictator dies, more news at 10
27
leoencore5 days ago
+11
No one will fire nukes just because this sack of shit is killed.
11
iSkulk_YT4 days ago
+6
Makes sense to me. If they have nuclear weapon to defend the supreme leader, then he gets popped, nuclear weapon should absolutely get fired for not performing the duties of the position.
6
Dopplegangr15 days ago
+8
Is someone trying to kill him? Nobody cares about NK, they are irrelevant
8
Big_Biscotti51195 days ago
+11
“F\*ck you, dolphins!”
11
Remcin4 days ago
+4
I figured that was just assumed, otherwise what the hell is the point of them?
4
Magnus_Helgisson4 days ago
+4
Look who’s trying to be relevant again!
4
ProudPainting68505 days ago
+8
No, they won't. NK will finally get access to all the p***, music, and movies they've always wanted. It's gonna be goon odyssey if Kim is killed.
https://www.newsweek.com/north-korean-troops-russia-ukraine-war-gorging-p**********-1981960
8
ghost_n_the_shell5 days ago
+3
Lil’ Kim over there, trying so hard to be noticed.
3
brenkosaur5 days ago
+3
I mean. If he is dead nobody would care if they ignored the order to fire. Imagine they disarm, setup a system to make sure nobody embezzles money like in russia, and they set up every family with a good home, education, and future.
Dictatorships are cruel. Its a dictatorship all in one bloodline - crazy.
3
taskforceslacker5 days ago
+3
Kim is the odd kid out for dodgeball. He’s sitting out but still talking trash from the bench.
3
Mountainenthusiast25 days ago
+3
“Felt random, might delete later”
3
Willy-Sshakes5 days ago
+3
Ok.poor dude feeling left out
3
slendido5 days ago
+3
I too am looking for relevance in this modern world
3
Chef_RoadRunner5 days ago
+3
Sounds like they are getting a little jealous of all the attention other countries are getting at the moment.
3
Punpun865 days ago
+3
As an celebration or what?
3
Skraelings5 days ago
+3
World: busy dealing other shit
N.korea: been a minute since anyone’s cared about us… we should probably start threatening again
3
Rokea-x5 days ago
+3
And go down in history as the guy who razed north korea. Noice
3
Beebajazz5 days ago
+3
North Korea, do you need a sandwich and a nap?
3
FTXACCOUNTANT5 days ago
+3
He definitely felt out
3
TheSaltySpitoon375 days ago
+3
But like...what if its just his cholesterol that does it?
3
abgry_krakow875 days ago
+3
Awww Kim, is the world not paying enough attention to you?
3
kindofajerk5 days ago
+3
"Hey, remember us?"
3
Poopedpantslaughing5 days ago
+3
That's cool.
He probably be killed from within.
They won't even have to use a missile.
3
Gooch_Doctor5 days ago
+3
They’ll probably launch it and it will land on Pyongyang
3
Rex_Digsdale4 days ago
+3
How do you kill a god?
3
AnInquisitive_Rock414 days ago
+3
I can see NK going nuclear if anything happened to dude. Not to far fetched.
3
multic944 days ago
+3
Russia has this same doctrine for their head of state.
3
tombrady0112354 days ago
+3
Why would anyone kill him at this point
3
Sea-Concentrate93794 days ago
+3
"WE'RE STILL HERE IN CASE YOU ALL FORGOT ABOUT US"
3
saylu814 days ago
+3
Kim Jong-un must be terrified after Venezuela president Maduro got abducted and US kill Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei.
Kim probably wouldn't feel safe even with nukes.
3
Linusami4 days ago
+3
That’s what they have to tell Kim. We good.
3
FeijoaMilkshake4 days ago
+3
Doubt it, it's a dictatorship, cut the head it can't grow a new one out but drop dead instantly.
3
BodybuilderUpbeat7865 days ago
+10
We know, its precisely why Iran wanted nukes in the first place.
10
Comfortable-Gur69085 days ago
+5
Quick, fire more missiles into the ocean!!!
5
Total_Drongo_Moron5 days ago
+4
Ok Hans Brix.
4
WhiteHeatBlackLight5 days ago
+4
Bro looks like a walking heart attack
4
Banaanisade5 days ago
+4
Has someone actually showed any legitimate interest in offing this guy since... ever?
4
GenghisKazoo5 days ago
+6
I mean, after Maduro and Khamenei both got very directly targeted, I can understand why a head of state on America's shit list might want to make such a statement.
6
SelfDepricator4 days ago
+4
If they actually have nukes then why did Trumpy boy and US governement not doing anything about? Oh wait the whole war is more.about oil than nukes
199 Comments