· 20 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 2, 2026 at 8:28 PM

Not just ICE: Do we need DHS?

Posted by salon


Not just ICE: Do we need DHS? - Salon.com
Salon.com
Not just ICE: Do we need DHS? - Salon.com
In it’s 24 year history DHS has failed to make Americans safer and has become increasingly politicized

🚩 Report this post

20 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
B-Z_B-S Apr 2, 2026 +45
No. We need some of the agencies within DHS, like FEMA and the Coast Guard, but it doesn't need to be all under one big thing. (Sources: John Oliver's segment on DHS and one of Heather Cox Richardson's videos.)
45
AntOk4073 Apr 2, 2026 +9
I think this is the best answer. I was going to say yes because there are good things that DHS does but separating them into their own functions is better.
9
WorkersThesis Apr 2, 2026 +18
coast guard was created in 1790 fema was created in 1979 dhs was created in 2002 - the justification was to make communication easier by bringing it all under one central authoritarian hierarchy -- that is how you politicize all those separate agencies. it's not needed, and it cripples the potential for freedom. if you are pro partisan super authority - then you are a far right authoritarian. no matter what a foreign comedian says.
18
deadzol Apr 3, 2026 +1
He’s a citizen now.
1
Andovars_Ghost Apr 2, 2026 +6
Exactly, put the agencies back where they were and get rid of ICE altogether.
6
wavygrave Apr 2, 2026 +31
i'm old enough to remember when the W admin invented the DHS and remember hoping someone would dismantle it again after the clowns left office. word to the wise, never underestimate the capacity of a clown car
31
literallytwisted Apr 2, 2026 +11
Same here! Remember when they told us DHS was mostly just a way to get multiple departments to communicate? What a shock it has been used more against Americans than anyone else.
11
ajmartin527 Apr 2, 2026 +4
These people may be idiots, but never underestimate their ability to drag you down to their level. Stupid doesn’t mean less dangerous
4
WorkersThesis Apr 2, 2026 +10
unrelated, but not really: i saw a video the other day from a mass shooting in january. when cops arrived on scene they murdered a young unarmed black man who was running for his life from the shooter. we need to abolish ice, we need to cripple dhs, we need to greatly defund policing in this country -- and fundamentally we need to reevaluate how we police, investigate, and enforce laws in this country. we've surrendered our privacy. not only do we allow 30 f****** redundant law enforcement agencies to now track and monitor us, making us a surveillance state, but our rights have been so stripped that any f****** private corporation can track us and trade our private information without our consent. we are the country the beats, arrests, shoots in the f****** back first - and asks questions later. due process was already stripped long before ice started serving fake warrants, detaining without cause, deporting without conviction, etc.
10
No_Customer_84 Apr 2, 2026 +7
NO. This agency wasnt even a thing until after I was out of college. It’s a hammer in search of a nail.
7
sugarlessdeathbear Apr 2, 2026 +5
We don't need a lot of the c*** we did after 9/11.
5
inksmudgedhands Apr 2, 2026 +5
Nope. That's what the FBI and the CIA are for. Also, while we are at it, can we open up the border between Canada and the US again like it used to be before Bush Jr. screwed it up? You used to be able to go from one country to another using only your driver's license. Now you need a passport. It was so much easier back then for everyone. Especially for people who worked on one side of the border but lived on the other side of the border as well as for people who had relatives on both sides. So many people who live far away from either side of the border don't realize how thin that border was and how people used to go back and forth like they were going from one state to another or from one providence to another every single day. So many Canadians have American relatives and so many Americans have Canadian relatives.
5
Outrageous_Story540 Apr 2, 2026 +3
this might even be a way to start making amends after the trump nonsense
3
literallytwisted Apr 2, 2026 +2
I hope to see a day when people just sign a registry with their name and purpose for visiting. IE - Name and purpose of visit = "Bob Smith, Getting some lumber"
2
ostuberoes Apr 2, 2026 +4
Man I was 21 years old and could tell the Patriot Act was not something any serious country would call a set of laws. Calling the us the "homeland"? That's insane! Department of Homeland Security? Terrifying! I was 21 and all this was obvious to me. I was sure we'd sort it out in a couple of years, especially after Dubya left office. We never did; wtf.
4
crazybones Apr 2, 2026 +3
With ICE what is gained is most certainly NOT JUST ICE.
3
QueenMagik Apr 2, 2026 +2
Nope
2
MultiGeometry Apr 2, 2026 +1
We didn’t have it when I was growing up, so it’s not needed. That’s my MAGA dad’s argument for the Department of Education. Why are we slashing budgets for the good stuff and enhancing them for the bad stuff (spying on citizens, assassinating protesters, terrorizing people of color)?
1
anotherdeadhero Apr 3, 2026 +1
Now we're asking the right questions.
1
army2693 Apr 2, 2026 -1
Yes. We need it. What we really need is a better way to pick a president. ALL federally elected persons should have a complete background check and check on their knowledge of how the constitution works. If the candidate refuses to participate, they don't get to be put on the election.
-1
← Back to Board