· 199 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 11, 2026 at 4:00 AM

One US citizen tests mildly positive for hantavirus, another has mild symptoms

Posted by AnnualEmbarrassed176



🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Shopworn_Soul 15 hr ago +1259
How does one test "mildly positive"? Isn't this sort of thing a yes or no question? I didn't know "eh, kinda...' was an option.
1259
floppy_disk_5 14 hr ago +446
"f*** it, close enough"-ass diagnosis
446
starrpamph 11 hr ago +80
Thats the lab work United healthcare pays for
80
WaffleHouseGladiator 12 hr ago +205
I would read this as either "tested positive with mild symptoms" or "tested positive with a low viral load." This is shitty journalism.
205
ActurusMajoris 10 hr ago +50
It was low viral load. On the border of what’s detectable.
50
MaineLark 9 hr ago +1
Exactly. It’s probably the beginning of the infection and the viral load will increase. I helped develop a rapid COVID test back in 2020. I’m having flashbacks 🫠
1
ActurusMajoris 9 hr ago +1
Hi, yes, I’d like to get off this planet now, thanks!
1
MorbotheDiddlyDo 10 hr ago +7
pretty mild then.
7
AnaisNinja76 10 hr ago +6
Can't be the first as they specified the second person as only having mild symptoms.
6
MaineLark 9 hr ago +1
They have to have a cutoff level for what is positive and what is negative. So this person had a low viral load that just barely went above that level. It’s likely the beginning of the infection
1
AnaisNinja76 9 hr ago +1
I'm aware. Like many in this thread, I've done pcr. Which is how I know "mildly positive" is not an actual term that's ever used.
1
CheesecakeEither8220 12 hr ago +91
Kind of pregnante. Hopital.
91
Pork_Sword3 10 hr ago +17
How many pregananent
17
radome9 10 hr ago +6
How girl get pregnert?
6
VanuasGirl 9 hr ago +1
How is babby form?
1
derkaderkaderka 11 hr ago +5
Do I have baby?
5
robicide 10 hr ago +3
Or am I ok?
3
CheesecakeEither8220 9 hr ago +2
You are pregnante. Go to hopital by hamulance for babby.
2
Bookwerm4life 11 hr ago +8
It means that they rolled a 5 for intuition, obviously
8
Zathala 11 hr ago +5
Sounds like a "mildly covid infections" but the country doesn't want to take responsibility for anything related to the citizen if they happen to infect anyone else.
5
deepasleep 10 hr ago +4
It’s Trump speak…Be gone by Easter. Totally under control.
4
AnnualEmbarrassed176 14 hr ago +82
Yes, they have the virus. The word "mildly" just refers to the amount of virus the test was able to detect, not whether the virus is present or not in medical testing, "mildly positive" (usually called a "weak positive") just means they have a very low viral load.
82
Ezekielth 14 hr ago +242
This is not a term used in any medical field when testing for infectious diseases. It is bad journalism.
242
aspz 10 hr ago +19
Well.. the journalists are simply repeating a statement made by the US government. So it's not bad journalism to quote an official source, but it is bad journalism for them not to qualify that the US HHS department is currently being run by a bunch of unqualified idiots: > One passenger currently has mild symptoms and another passenger tested mildly PCR positive for the Andes virus. https://x.com/HHSGov/status/2053656580118216985
19
WingsNthingzz 13 hr ago +61
You’re absolutely right. One US citizen has tested positive and is presenting with mild symptoms. Guess I can work at Reuters now.
61
themobiledeceased2 13 hr ago +33
Political re-framing.  This previous message was how rare person to person transmission is. Mildly positive is less alarming than confirmed positive.  Not to mention, the patient doesn't need to hear talking heads quoting the ٪ for survival is 50/50.
33
Ezekielth 13 hr ago +33
Mild positive is confirmed positive. If we assume mildy positive means lower viral load that still does not necessarily tell you anything about the course of illness.
33
FanohgeChamoru 11 hr ago +7
Exactly! They either have it or they don’t.
7
heart_of_osiris 14 hr ago +11
It's not hard to understand; it's exactly like binary code. Sometimes it's mildly 1, other times it's mildly 0.
11
tanghan 10 hr ago +2
Maybe like if on the covid tests your line was faint the first or last days of infection
2
OrangeRadiohead 12 hr ago +3
They have a runny nose.
3
spottie_ottie 15 hr ago +592
Both were in the boat
592
TuckerCarlsonsOhface 14 hr ago +603
I heard they were only mildly on the boat
603
goodtimesinchino 12 hr ago +70
I’m personally only mildly positive they were on the boat.
70
flyinghairball 12 hr ago +10
I'm only mildly positive there was a boat
10
superchargerhe 12 hr ago +8
Are you mildly about that
8
RGrad4104 12 hr ago +33
Can they mildly stay on the f****** boat? We did this airlift back home stuff during covid and it didn't turn out well. I'm all for supporting my countrymen, but the line has to be drawn somewhere. If you're on a cruise to south america and catch hantavirus, the closest to the continental US that you come for the next 12 weeks should be Guantanamo bay...
33
almosttan 12 hr ago +34
But do these passengers diminish the "need intimate close contact to catch it" theory?
34
nurseferatou 12 hr ago +27
Only mildly
27
MudiMom 11 hr ago +15
This is my question too. Seems to be a lot of people for a disease that “doesn’t spread easily”.
15
Ahelex 15 hr ago +944
The title could honestly be the start of a medical exam question: "One patient was tested mildly positive for virus A, while the other patient has mild symptoms for virus A. What is the difference? \[5 points\]"
944
greentea1985 15 hr ago +322
The initial symptoms of hantavirus are identical to those of a lot of other respiratory illnesses, like the common cold, flu, COVID, etc. One American passenger has tested positive for hantavirus, and another is showing mild symptoms that could be hantavirus, but is currently testing negative.
322
The_Shryk 14 hr ago +332
You’re either positive or negative. I don’t think there’s such thing as mildly positive.
332
Genius-Imbecile 14 hr ago +230
I'm mildly positive that you are correct.
230
The_Shryk 14 hr ago +77
I’m mildly positive the title is just engagement bait.
77
ThreeKiloZero 14 hr ago +36
I'm positively negative about this whole situation.
36
MonPetit_Chou 14 hr ago +10
Unfortunately, the title is indeed what the official U.S. statement said.
10
flyinghairball 12 hr ago +5
I would say that I was mildly surprised this was the official statement, but I'm less than mildly surprised
5
CalvinAshdale- 13 hr ago +2
Sort of a 'both things are true' type of situation
2
pyronius 14 hr ago +9
I'm mildly neutral that you're both wrong
9
ChanceryTheRapper 14 hr ago +6
All I know is my gut says *maybe.*
6
wesman212 14 hr ago +5
r/Mildlypositive
5
evilsalmon 14 hr ago +71
Mildly will be in reference to viral load - which is absolutely the case, but different diseases have different thresholds for how high/low a viral load is dangerous and infectious for other people. There can be orders of magnitude difference. That said in this case I agree it’s a somewhat nonsense & unhelpful distinction.
71
Responsible_Scale_70 13 hr ago +10
sooo… positive
10
Aaronkenobi 13 hr ago +6
Yes but potentially not positive enough to show up as positive. Thresholds in medical testing are super fun
6
Responsible_Scale_70 13 hr ago +7
Small viral loads in PCR testing are still positive.
7
Arctic_Chilean 14 hr ago +19
*"you are midly aladeen"*
19
LikeAnAnonmenon 13 hr ago +3
Mildly aladeen, or mildly... alaDEEN?
3
greentea1985 14 hr ago +27
You are correct, but that isn’t what is going on here. Of the 17 American passengers evacuated from the ship, one passenger (passenger A) has tested positive for hantavirus. Another of the American passengers (passenger B) has mild symptoms that COULD be hantavirus, but the tests have so far been negative. Passenger A definitely had hantavirus, passenger B possibly has hantavirus but it could be a cold, allergies, or another respiratory ailment.
27
Totalnah 13 hr ago +4
There’s a 1-8 week incubation period, and testing done before the 72 hour window after initial symptoms present is unreliable as the virus may not be detectable yet.
4
Flimsy-Sprinkles7331 14 hr ago +13
Like being "mildly pregnant!"
13
AirportLoose3023 13 hr ago +8
Mildly positive is like being a little bit pregnant haha
8
redline83 13 hr ago +3
Do you want the Aladeen news or the Aladeen news?
3
ctorg 15 hr ago +40
Answer: the first patient tested positive for hantavirus while the second patient has symptoms but either has not been tested or the test results aren’t back yet.
40
_Lucille_ 14 hr ago +39
"Mildly positive" is such an odd term. Either you are positive or you are not.
39
Granum22 13 hr ago +9
Antigen tests can have a strong positive or weak positive results based on how much antigen is present in the sample.  A weak positive can also be indicative of a false positive 
9
sciencesez 14 hr ago +12
Isn't that exactly the same as testing mildly positive for pregnancy?
12
Suchisthe007life 14 hr ago +14
They caught a mild case of the death.
14
M1sfit_Jammer 14 hr ago +6
My answer would be… Mildly positive is not a definitive positive, while patient B hasn’t been tested. Lab results for things like viruses/bacteria are direct affirmative/negative. A lab giving results like “kinda positive” is not a thing. What determines “mildly positive” is it a lab technicians vibe or is there a thresh-hold that’s been peer-reviewed and signed off by CAP (college of American pathology). All lab machines I’ve worked with give only positive/negative because reporting “mildly positive” is not an objective answer. Medically speaking there is no difference between these patients as their condition is under suspicion for Virus A as cause of their current condition is yet to be determined. If their presentation warrants, admit to appropriate care level and provide supportive care until lab results determines course of care.
6
Responsible_Scale_70 13 hr ago +6
I just think that’s the govt downplaying a positive PCR result. Even if the viral load is low, it’s still there.
6
redline83 13 hr ago +3
Yes it’s possible they were/are asymptomatic but they were definitely “infected”
3
NW-McWisconsin 14 hr ago +3
If your girlfriend tested mildly positive for pregnancy, you'd be scared. Mild symptoms could be from the anchovies on the pizza.
3
Frosti11icus 13 hr ago +2
I like how news media has just stolen salsa terminology for describing deadly contagions in order to pacify all of us. This is mild hanta it basically tomatoes.
2
wown123456 15 hr ago +309
Mildly positive.. like pregnancy test barely showing two lines at 7 weeks mark?
309
Nomadic_Yak 14 hr ago +84
Mildly pregnant
84
Stratotally 14 hr ago +30
Am I pargant?
30
BlindProphet_413 14 hr ago +28
Can u get pregante?
28
Queasy-Warthog-3642 14 hr ago +15
I honestly don't know how to spell preguante correctly anymore
15
Stratotally 14 hr ago +17
Am I gregnant?
17
Responsible_Scale_70 13 hr ago +7
Am I mildly pregananant?
7
Bipogram 12 hr ago +7
Am I mildewed pomegranate?
7
freemysou1 11 hr ago +2
Can you down 20 foot waterslide maldly pegnat?
2
Pork_Sword3 10 hr ago +2
Are these systoms of being mildly pregarnt?
2
adsarelies 14 hr ago +6
"Mildly dead"
6
hooti_hooo 14 hr ago +7
Just go see miracle max.
7
KimJongFunk 15 hr ago +97
Article text in case anyone needs it with the paywall: > May 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said on Sunday that one of the 17 Americans being repatriated from a hantavirus-struck luxury cruise ship has tested mildly positive for the ‌Andes strain of the virus while a second has mild symptoms. > All the U.S. citizens are being airlifted to the United States, and the two passengers with symptoms are travelling in the plane's biocontainment units, HHS added. The second symptomatic passenger has not yet been confirmed as having the virus. > Hantaviruses ⁠are a group of viruses that are usually spread by rodents but in rare cases can be transmitted person to person. Health authorities have said the risk of the virus spreading is low. > Eight people no longer on the MV Hondius have fallen ill, according to a World Health Organization update from Friday, with six of them confirmed to have contracted the virus. A Dutch couple and a German national have died. > The Andes strain of hantavirus, identified in the ship's ‌outbreak, ⁠can cause severe lung illness that can be fatal in up to 50% of cases, according to the WHO. > The U.S. State Department's airlift will transport passengers to the ASPR Regional Emerging Special Pathogen Treatment Center (RESPTC) at the University of Nebraska Medical Center ⁠in Omaha, Nebraska, and the passenger with mild symptoms will be taken to a second RESPTC, the HHS said. > On arrival at the facilities, each individual will undergo clinical assessment ⁠and receive care based on their condition, HHS added. > Spain and France have evacuated their citizens from the MV Hondius, which is anchored near Tenerife, the ⁠largest of the Canary Islands, officials said. Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Turkey, the UK and Ireland are also flying home nationals who were on the ship.
97
wewereromans 14 hr ago +84
So the article is either ignoring that the Andes strain can be transmitted from person to person or the US health officials in question are.
84
Disc-Golf-Kid 14 hr ago +24
Although this strain has that capability, it is still difficult for it to pass from human to human because it isn’t very contagious unless there is very close contact.
24
d0ctorzaius 13 hr ago +78
Agreed, my concern is more that so many people of the ship seem to be testing positive. Previous human to human transmission required VERY close contact (ie sleeping together). Unless this cruise ship was having orgies, there shouldn't have been close enough contact for this many people to contract it. Unless of course this strain is more transmissible in which case all bets are off. An alternative is that a lot of passengers were directly exposed to hantavirus+ rodent feces and most of these cases are rodent to human not human to human. That would be preferred.
78
proteinstyle_ 12 hr ago +21
Just one of many great points that aren't being addressed.
21
BlueCyann 11 hr ago +14
That's not true, as the last outbreak in Argentina documented several cases from a large birthday party.
14
StrangledInMoonlight 12 hr ago +10
Possible the original infected couple brought rat poop with them?  On their shoes, binoculars or luggage?  They keep touching the dirty things and tracking the poop throughout the ship on doorknobs and other surfaces? 
10
Xbob42 11 hr ago +3
Is it possible the water supply was infected? Maybe a rat died in it?
3
malianx 12 hr ago +8
Have you been on a cruise? I wouldn't rule orgies (or just a lot of fornication in general), out.
8
redline83 13 hr ago +37
It’s not all that difficult if you read the case reports about the birthday spread event a few years back in Argentina. It’s not COVID but we should not falsely reassure people. I feel like the scientific community is doing this at the moment. This is a decent R0 given the assumption no infected rodents were on the ship.
37
FlatVegetable4231 13 hr ago +19
Great way to put it. It is almost as if they are saying it is near impossible yet we keep getting more cases. I have only heard prolonged contact, well how prolonged is prolonged? It won't be covid but it isn't as rare as they are making it sound either. 
19
dontbeslo 14 hr ago +36
Seems to be a hell of a lot of people testing positive for something that isn’t very contagious
36
RGrad4104 12 hr ago +8
Everyone keeps saying that, but the infected numbers keep growing. Unless there was a multinational o*** going on while onboard that ship, I think we are all being jerked around.
8
LittleKitty235 14 hr ago +44
The CDC and WHO don't have enough credibility left after the mishandling of COVID for me to trust that is the case. The public is right to worry this could be a new variant of the Andes strain and it is more contagious than previous ones. It doesn't help we have Trump and RFK running the show again. It feels like a bad sequel.
44
Ashkir 14 hr ago +33
Or that we cut the CDC so much and the world's best viral spread experts no longer work there
33
LittleKitty235 13 hr ago +11
Based on the Trump administrations denial that covid was happening back in 2019 and 2020 I'd assume anyone who still has a job there would be fired for raising concerns if they have any. This government lies so much it is impossible to trust information it puts out, picking up some n95 masks now might not be a bad idea.
11
BlueCyann 11 hr ago +4
No, that part seems to be BS, which is ... not great. Still probably going for us is that the genome has been sequenced and it doesn't appear notably different from previous South American outbreaks which were contained. Not spreading well prior to the onset of symptoms is a big plus. The flight attendant from last week not actually having it is a plus, too. Remains to be seen what kind of contact these passengers had with the earlier cases.
4
Olbaidon 14 hr ago +23
A lot of people keep fear mongering that it’s gonna be another pandemic, but even when society was denying COVID, health officials around the world were warning of the dangers of how easily COVID-19 could and was spreading from humans to human. Nearly everyone, at first, was saying “meh yeah okay, won’t leave China.” Meanwhile health officials all over the world are now saying it should be taken seriously, we are taking it seriously, however it doesn’t spread easily. And now everyone is like “hunker down!!!” We as a society are truly enigmatic.
23
snapchillnocomment 14 hr ago +32
To be clear, at the very beginning of the COVID pandemic, most mainstream sources told us there was nothing to worry about. In late January of 2020, while China was welding people shut in their buildings in Wuhan, the WHO came out and said there was no evidence of human to human transmission, the CDC told people not to wear masks, and the health commissioner of NY was telling people there was nothing to worry about and that they should attend lunar new year. There were also lots of articles in the MSM about how COVID is no deadlier than the flu and reminding people that SARS was a thing 2 decades earlier and it wasn't all that bad. Meanwhile, it was some niche figures like  Eric Feigl-Ding who really talked up COVID'S severity, and ironically, they were dismissed as being alarmist. Everything you're talking about happened well after those early days. Incidentally, we're still in the early days of this outbreak, and just as before, there are some niche but respectable epidemiologists saying this could be bad, all the while we're being told by the media and the WHO not to worry.
32
Olbaidon 13 hr ago +6
We knew the historical data and possible R0 of both illnesses in this situation. Coronaviruses had shown multiple times in history to have R0 of 2 to 3. Everything we know about hantaviruses is 1 or under. Had Covid been on that ship for the same timeframe (assuming no previous vaccines etc) the cases would be staggeringly higher, like nearly everyone would have contracted it after 40 days in close contact with 175 people. We know this. While the incubation period is longer for hantavirus. We’re still looking at 8 confirmed cases after nearly 6 weeks. I’m not here to say it’s impossible, but what we knew then and what we know now about the two viruses point quite clearly to not being nearly the same situation. With COVID the thought process was less that it could spread and was serious, and more along the lines of what happened with SARS; in expecting it wouldn’t travel far, or would mutate itself into weakness due to its fast mutation rate. Since this happens a lot of the time, where as hantavirus is a very stable extremely slow mutating RNA virus.
6
redline83 13 hr ago +13
There’s already two journal articles showing ANDV with higher R0, driven only to below 1 with isolation and aggressive contact tracing.
13
Early-Light-864 13 hr ago +8
The 2018 outbreak of the Andes variant had an average r0 of 2+ (peak of 6+)
8
bussymonke 12 hr ago +10
stop calm mongering. it is better to be cautious than sorry. you are not a medical expert.
10
garathnor 13 hr ago +13
i want to note, fatal in 50% of cases is WITH medical attention, at home youll likely just die
13
synack 13 hr ago +3
Biocontainment unit looks dope https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeromedical_Biological_Containment_System
3
Juicebox-shakur 14 hr ago +17
what the f*** is “MILDLY POSITIVE” ?????? That’s… that’s not how that works. The second passenger has “mild symptoms”, sure yeah that’s reasonable. But “ *mildly* positive” is a bunch of horseshit. You’re either positive or you’re negative.
17
yahwehforlife 14 hr ago +5
Sing it!!! "RESPTC" find out what it means to me!
5
snapchillnocomment 14 hr ago +4
>the ASPR Regional Emerging Special Pathogen Treatment Center (RESPTC) I feel like they could've done a better job with this name
4
buzzonga 15 hr ago +94
Quite a bit riding on Mild here.
94
Samuraispirits 14 hr ago +34
Is mildly written in black sharpie?
34
uswhole 14 hr ago +24
headline next month: man found mildly died from hantavirus
24
onelasteffort13 15 hr ago +32
I’m slightly pregnant? Hand me that piano. Mostly pasteurized
32
allursnakes 14 hr ago +16
He's only mildly dead, sir.
16
Complexology 13 hr ago +41
This Harvard professor says the official messaging that prolonged contact is needed to spread isn't accurate. The research paper be references contact traced the last outbreak and had transmission happening in passing at a birthday party. https://youtu.be/rO4Xd5PfIo0
41
dontbeslo 13 hr ago +16
I saw this as well and that data was taken from a recent outbreak where they were able to contain it via quick action and contact tracing.
16
redline83 13 hr ago +17
This is true. It’s not being taken seriously enough.
17
TastyCuttlefish 14 hr ago +26
Mildly positive? “I may have committed some mild treason” gif
26
Dreuh2001 12 hr ago +11
I'm mildly positive that a positive is a positive
11
bratch 14 hr ago +34
Right up there with "alternative facts." Trump said his admin had COVID under control in late January 2020, same shit he's saying now about hantavirus. We're better off getting facts from anywhere except the US Government.
34
reddit_wisd0m 12 hr ago +5
Fifa world cup may become a super spreader event. Fantastic...
5
Historical_Lab8619 12 hr ago +35
Self-monitor?!? No no no, not after symptoms. Their asses need to stay in quarantine. Sorry, but how's that fair to everyone else? Its nit about creating panic, its commin sense. People have already died. If someone is in quarantine and breaks that quarantine, especially if they are symptomatic, they should be charged. I cancel appointments if I have a cold, and no one will potentially die from that, how irresponsible. Smh
35
WhateverSure 14 hr ago +51
They should have left them all on the boat and parachuted in assistance as needed.
51
LittleKitty235 14 hr ago +64
Bigger problem was people who had been on that boat had already departed at earlier stops and could have been infected when they left. That said the lack of standards in how each country is handling quarantine is absolutely pathetic after just going through COVID.
64
WhateverSure 14 hr ago +7
They're a problem too - I know they've been traced since and whatnot. I'd vote to send them back to the boat in this already-theoretical scenario though haha.
7
fiendishrabbit 13 hr ago +11
No. It's MUCH better to get people off the petri-dish that is a cruise ship and into quarantine facilities. Unlike COVID19, Hantavirus requires prolonged contact. The longer people stay inside a place that's basically designed to infect other people, the worse it's going to get. So ideally everyone would have been taken off the ship ASAP, separated and quarantined.
11
Top_Oil_9473 14 hr ago +20
Is “testing mildly positive” kind of like being “mildly pregnant”?
20
Kurtotall 14 hr ago +17
This keeps getting mildly worse.
17
Rogue_AI_Construct 14 hr ago +40
What a stupid time to have RFK Jr. as HHS Secretary.
40
adrianmonk 11 hr ago +8
All times are stupid times to have RFK Jr as HHS Secretary. But this time in particular is especially stupid.
8
airwalker08 13 hr ago +19
Why does this shit only happen while we have idiots running the country?
19
lazycultenthusiast 12 hr ago +8
Competency prevents things like this is why.
8
AnaisNinja76 12 hr ago +6
Mildly positive! Since when is that a thing? You can have a "mild" case of something, but the virus is either present or not present. What a weird headline. It's not even mildly possible to test "mildly positive" on *any* test. Even if they were quantifying, the quant will differ by tissue tested.
6
realfakejames 11 hr ago +13
What the f*** is mildly positive, you either have it or you don't This is what happens when Trump appoints the dumbest people to run our health department
13
KennyKei94 15 hr ago +32
Covid 2: Hantavirus Bugaloo
32
korkythecat333 14 hr ago +6
Ratvid-19
6
Private_Kyle 12 hr ago +2
With twice the ignorance from the New Trump Adminstration
2
Radioplay79 14 hr ago +3
Scrolled too far
3
timfountain4444 10 hr ago +6
"Mildly positive"? Is that like being "mildly pregnant"?. Good grief, what journalistic garbage. You are either positive or not. And I really feel that this whole outbreak has been mismanaged and will spiral.... Every single person should have been isolated for a prudent amount of time.
6
Hi-Scan-Pro 15 hr ago +16
"You see your friend here is only **mostly** ~~positive~~ dead."
16
effitalll 15 hr ago +12
I’m not dead yet! I don’t want to go on the cart
12
radome9 9 hr ago +3
Don't be such a baby.
3
Daisies_are_Daisy 12 hr ago +19
I’m a pcr analyst. When I test for a virus, it is either positive or negative. There is no mildly positive. There are times it barely crosses the threshold for a positive, but that doesn’t mean you can call it a mild positive.
19
AnaisNinja76 10 hr ago +4
Right???? I'm going through and upvoting literally everyone saying the same thing. This thread is hilariously loaded with people who've done benchwork with pcr that are all annoyed by the same thing. Every once in a while someone tries to claim that it's normal medical/scientific jargon when it's absolutely not.
4
Ok-End-9930 14 hr ago +12
How can a test be mildly positive? It either positive or negative. 
12
demonlag 13 hr ago +10
It can be mildly positive because the people currently in charge of this are (somehow) even less qualified than the people who were in charge of COVID.
10
N314ER 14 hr ago +6
Ahhh but see he’s only mostly dead, which is much different than completely dead!
6
Bishopjones2112 12 hr ago +6
I love the mild positive, just like a little cold is all.
6
RaspberryChainsaw 14 hr ago +12
What the f*** even is "mildly positive"? So they're positively mild???
12
worldscollice 14 hr ago +13
“Hantavirus is a hoax” - Donald Trump
13
yahwehforlife 14 hr ago +18
I tested "mildly positive" for West Nile Virus when I was absolutely sure I had it along with all of the symptoms for west Nile after getting like 100 mosquito bites in California. They just called it "mildly positive" because I was the first case in my county and they wanted to be sure before starting a scare.
18
Kava2126 14 hr ago +4
Only mildly not breathing
4
Arceptor 14 hr ago +4
WHO said there will be more cases.
4
sunburn74 13 hr ago +3
This is all very scary stuff...
3
kwokinator 12 hr ago +5
"mildly positive" fits right into George Carlin's "Near Miss" skit. For those not enlightened, educate yourself on George Carlin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1kK-_o_-tY
5
ohlalariana2 12 hr ago +4
so they mildly have a 30 percent chance to die from an infectious virus?
4
ElizaMaySampson 9 hr ago +4
Donald Trump in 2020 regarding COVID: 'We have it totally under control. It's one person coming in from China, and we have it under control. It's going to be just fine," Trump told CNBC's Joe Kernen. This comment was made just one day after the CDC (now gutted) confirmed the first case of the virus in a Washington state resident who had returned from Wuhan, China.
4
ThisNameIsHilarious 15 hr ago +19
I cannot do this again
19
Xanchush 13 hr ago +6
F*** his liberties. I wanna live. Quarantee that guy.
6
krehns 13 hr ago +3
If you test mildly positive for weed, do you get to keep your job?
3
Shifty269 12 hr ago +3
Cool, where are they going on their national tour 1st?/s
3
LadyInCrimson 10 hr ago +3
I hate that they are taking them to two separate places. Because now two different transport teams, two centers twice the chance of spreading. That's just my dumb math.
3
AncientLionSpirit 10 hr ago +3
Guys relax, WHO said its not a big deal same as when corona virus came out
3
Assine2 9 hr ago +3
Is rhis info from the government? If so they are lying. The citizens are deathly ill.
3
Jcklvy 9 hr ago +1
Good thing our current admin is known for brilliantly handling massive outbreak situations /s
1
SMFDR 14 hr ago +6
Oh it is so over for us
6
OneRub3234 14 hr ago +4
So they are positive and SHOULD STAY THE F*** TO THEMSELVES!!!!
4
nyITguy 14 hr ago +5
And to their closest friends and family, maybe the Uber driver, the few people in the waiting room, nurses & doctors.
5
AiMwithoutBoT 12 hr ago +6
STOP TESTING IF UOU DONT TEST YOU DONT HAVE SICK PEOPLE!!11!1!1 /s
6
Fancy_Possibility456 14 hr ago +8
This is the dumbest headline…you’re either positive or negative…you either have it or you don’t…there’s no “mild positive” bullshit, this is gaslighting
8
yahwehforlife 14 hr ago +2
Just a little positive 😉
2
No_Mastodon_7896 12 hr ago +3
What exactly is mildly positive? Either you are or you are not. Once again our government is playing games, there is hantavirus infection and RFK Jr is in no way going to handle this.
3
privateidaho_chicago 12 hr ago +4
They must have taken him to Miracle Max …. He only partially dead !
4
DMV2PNW 12 hr ago +3
What’s the difference between, mildly positive, medium positive and real positive? /s
3
rel1800 14 hr ago +2
Man, did they get that shit or not? Mildly my ass
2
EclecticEthic 13 hr ago +2
Is this like testing just a little bit pregnant.
2
mdjak1 13 hr ago +2
RFK Jr. should be able to deal with this for Donald Trump. Right? Right????
2
my-name-is-squirrel 11 hr ago +2
It's cool y'all, just a mild case. Nbd! 👌
2
Embarrassed-Back1894 11 hr ago +2
You know, I was just thinking it had been almost a week since we had another disaster thrown at us here in the US.
2
RawrRRitchie 11 hr ago +2
That's at least TWO people then... Math is hard
2
MorbotheDiddlyDo 10 hr ago +2
Mild pretty mild headline mild. I mild wonder mild if mild they mild could mild have mild inserted "mild" any mild more mildly. mild.
2
outdior1986 10 hr ago +2
Kind of sort of maybe positive 
2
Life-Sun- 9 hr ago +2
“mildly positive” wtf does that mean? Positive is positive and can spread.
2
ElizaMaySampson 9 hr ago +1
The light is 'mildly' on.
1
dumpln 9 hr ago +1
Just like being a little pregnant?
1
h1pp0star 9 hr ago +1
Must have been diagnosed by RFK himself.
1
wallyrules75 9 hr ago +1
Are you shocked that statement came from a department spokesman? Imagine the brainstorming session that led to that! What got passed on?
1
phroztbyt3 9 hr ago +1
Well that's a relief. Imagine if he was spicy positive.
1
Skyisonfire 8 hr ago +1
The universe is literally throwing plagues at us every time Trump is in office.
1
Big_Instruction9922 8 hr ago +1
No one tests mildly positive.  It's positive or not. 
1
ty_xy 10 hr ago +4
I'm so glad that the USA is being led by amazing and intelligent people, who will definitely contain and take care of this situation really well, and they will continue to lead the WHO. I'm so glad that the US secretary of health is such am intelligent guy who doesn't eat road kill and doesn't peddle misinformation, and that the US president is the most stable genius who has passed so many cognitive screening tests... / Sarcasm if unclear
4
Creepy_Trouble_5980 14 hr ago +3
The rats are on the ship.
3
Responsible_Scale_70 13 hr ago +2
You solved it.
2
Sam_nick 14 hr ago +3
Don't worry guys, your orange prez will keep you all safe
3
Zanian19 11 hr ago +3
Phew, only mildly positive. We'll get away with just a sorta pandemic
3
← Back to Board