Did he remember to bring his briefcase full of money?
10
menalhCB34 days ago
+7
Hopefully this one goes better than the last.
7
sgtabn1734 days ago
+12
Since when did we trust Pakistan again? Weren’t these the dudes that hid Bin Laden?
12
toeknn4 days ago
+13
Turns out you need a terrorist handler to handle a terrorist regime.
13
sgtabn1734 days ago
+5
I would have preferred to just stay the f*** out of the ME in the first place tbh.
Maybe 3rd times the charm 🤷♂️
5
toeknn4 days ago
+1
Middle east is a quagmire. Cant go hands off unfortunately.
Too much energy, too much trade.
Dosnt help that its the region that is the intersection of the existing world powers sphere of influences.
Nor does it help the region is in a dsrk age following the partition and collapse of the ottoman empires. Borders and identities are in a state of thrash.
1
Adventurous_Bell96724 days ago
+9
trumps favourite self made field marshal ( cough cough dictator )
9
lllDogalll4 days ago
+7
It would be funny if accidental bombing resulted in killing of the head Pakistani guy is what permanently sours the American-Pakistani relationship that survived asylum to Osama Bin Laden by the Pakistani establishment.
7
1balKXhine4 days ago
+1
Bro I don't even want to think what'll happen then, Pakistan is a nuclear armed country with a capable army, they will strike back on Israel. This will truly be the start of WW3
1
lllDogalll4 days ago
i think is going off a bit too much off to a fantasy off ramp instead of probable Alternative history of stuff that can happen.
I don't think Pakistan will ever have the balls to use Nuclear weapons against anybody other than India. Their elites class that actually control the button have too much invested in the area around Israel. (And even the Indian elites have too much investment in the Middle East).
Their nuclear weapons if they are ever used, (and India will only use theirs if they are attacked first) will be used in Northern India. And that has very little chance of that happening.
But if it did occur, the death toll from those reciprocal strikes will probably ensure the end of nuclear strikes in future coz it will mean like 10-15% of humanity is wiped out. Probably even both world wars combined wouldn't have effected humankind as a whole.
0
1balKXhine4 days ago
+3
Yeah I don't think nuclear weapons will be used but I said nuclear armed because it's a real threat and gives them a lot of power unlike Iran or any middle eastern country except Israel
3
cytokine71 day ago
+1
Israel has them and it hasn’t stopped Iran from attacking them from all sides for decades.
The only situation I think they would use them is if things got truly existential, and then the world would change forever. Makes me wonder what all the people looking to topple Israel actually think would happen if they succeeded.
1
katalysis3 days ago
+3
Balls have nothing to do with it. Nuclear weapons aren't used. The idea that with big enough balls, one would use nukes is Trump level dumb.
3
Amonfire17763 days ago
+3
Even dumber...you would have to not value self preservation...
3
CommunicationLife7533 days ago
+3
why is a army cheif of a country doing so much for peace? what's their prime minister doing?
3
xevaviona3 days ago
+2
army rules in Pakistan my man
2
ohnohelpwhereamI4 days ago
+3
Try not to blow up any little girls when you break negotiations this time.
3
HormuzVengeance4 days ago
I hope you spoke out against islamic republic legalising marriage and r*** of little girls, and their murder of little girls in the thousands, or their use of child soldiers, or their prostitution of little girls to terrorist militias, or their gassing of a little girls school.
Hopefully you don’t only care about little Iranian girls dying when it’s the US, but also when islamic regime have killed a thousand times more little girls.
0
ohnohelpwhereamI3 days ago
+5
Yep. F*** them too.
5
HormuzVengeance3 days ago
+1
Good. Thank you. I hope you continue to speak out against islamic republic, as their eradication will be the biggest step towards peace in the Middle East.
1
HormuzVengeance4 days ago
+1
Why should there be peace with islamic republic? The world didn’t want peace talks with ISIS. They understood that only the eradication of ISIS would ensure peace.
islamic republic is the same.
1
BOPSurfcasting14 days ago
-2
We here on the other side of the world don't give a f*** about ISiS or the Islamic Republic, only you Americans do. We do give a f*** about fuel and food prices though, we want peace.
-2
HormuzVengeance4 days ago
+7
I’m not American. I’m Iranian.
7
BOPSurfcasting13 days ago
There is a internet blackout in Iran, I take it you're not in Iran?
0
HormuzVengeance3 days ago
+1
No, I’m not. We have very intermittent contact with our family in Iran. I last got a couple of messages through to me 4 days ago, but all of the VPNs they are attempting to use are either getting blocked or something else is happening with the internet.
The vast majority of people don’t have any internet access at all, or the connection is so poor only one or two small sentences are coming through via some messaging apps.
26 Comments