· 125 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 12, 2026 at 8:09 AM

Pakistan Let Iran Park Jets At Nur Khan Airbase To Shield From US Strike: Report

Posted by BendicantMias



🚩 Report this post

125 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
CrazyCrazyCanuck 1 day ago +1255
Fun fact: Iraqi jets bombed Iran using conventional and chemical weapons during the Iran–Iraq War, then a few years later, those exact same jets flew back to Iran and their pilots took the bus home, stranding the planes in Iran. It was because Iraq was being bombed by coalition forces during the Gulf War and it was better to strand your planes in a former enemy's territory rather than have them destroyed on the ground. Ironically, it's even possible that one of Iranian jets now parked in Pakistan was originally used by Iraq to bomb Iran.
1255
Astrocoder 23 hr ago +177
Then at the end of the war Iran didnt return the jets.
177
TinyFugue 23 hr ago +190
*I, against my brothers. I and my brothers against my cousins. I and my brothers and my cousins against the world.*
190
ProfessorPetrus 21 hr ago +20
This is encapuslating. What it from?
20
iLikeSaints 20 hr ago +39
Seems to be an "old Bedouin saying".
39
MaybeTheDoctor 22 hr ago +26
So Pakistan now have new jets?
26
PieHole_Poker 22 hr ago +42
No they're really old
42
StatusCount7032 19 hr ago +20
With one, F5, reportedly being able to sneak in and doing a bombing raid in Kuwait.
20
PieHole_Poker 18 hr ago +16
People often confuse low tech with bad tech. The only problem with these low tech planes is supply and logistics... If it were me and I had a small little Air Force I would have P-51 mustangs built to today's standards and with modern tech. Get low. get fast. get dirty
16
ivan927 16 hr ago +13
I like this idea. a fleet of Super Tucanos.
13
PieHole_Poker 16 hr ago +3
Super duper
3
2Nails 21 hr ago +21
The infamous Pakistani "3000 Black Jets of Allah"
21
xerberos 18 hr ago +5
Painting small bombs on the side of the aircraft to symbolize completed bombing missions must get a little awkward.
5
[deleted] 1 day ago +1424
[removed]
1424
ValuableUpset9348 1 day ago +449
And not just any military base,, but one of the most important ones where all high level pak officers are also trained and live, and closest military base to capital lol. 
449
TadpoleOfDoom 1 day ago +91
Wasn't it their air force academy or something?
91
algos_are_alive 1 day ago +140
It's like the West Point of USA: most important for leadership training.
140
Pani_ki_bottle 22 hr ago +17
Was he a guest lecturer or something?
17
HuckleberryHot4551 22 hr ago +16
He was there as guest faculty. They just had to dial 911 to summon him.
16
[deleted] 23 hr ago +33
[removed]
33
ValuableUpset9348 1 day ago +35
It has everything. That's why most important one. 
35
ArsiCharsi 23 hr ago +8
It’s a Military Academy, not a base. And all the high ranking officers are in GHQ which is in Rawalpindi (Different city) not Abbottabad. Still pretty important.
8
TheDarthSnarf 20 hr ago +3
> and closest military base to capital lol. This isn't quite true. The location of the house where Osama Bin Laden was hiding, and the nearby Pakistan Military Academy, are in Abbottabad, ~2 hours north of the capital of Islamabad. There are multiple military bases in the immediate vicinity of Islamabad/Rawalpindi including, but not limited to, the Islamabad Defense Complex, Noor Khan Airbase, Dhamial Airbase, the 111th Infantry Brigade HQ (Capital Security). There are still several other facilities, PAF Minhas (Air Force Base) for example, which are closer to Islamabad than the military Pakistan Military Academy/Abbottabad.
3
Nederlander1 1 day ago +125
Pakistan may need some freedom from the sound of it
125
marshalist 1 day ago +88
They don't have oil I'm afraid.
88
LaconicLacedaemonian 1 day ago +42
Just sprinkle some when they're not looking 
42
Vellus 9 hr ago +1
Open and shut case Johnson. Now let's get out of here.
1
Mobile-Base7387 23 hr ago +3
didn't they discover a bunch off the coast in the past couple years?
3
sol-4 15 hr ago +1
They keep discovering it wherever their military needs a new distraction and needs something that feels like hope to fool their ever so willing populace.
1
deja-roo 22 hr ago +3
Neither did Afghanistan?
3
redpoemage 1 day ago +15
Having oil or not is way less important than having nukes.
15
jbrunsonfan 1 day ago +16
Than making* nukes Actually having them is the safest thing for you
16
tirigbasan 1 day ago +51
They have nukes so it's a no go I'm afraid
51
Ecureuil02 1 day ago +11
Nukes and nuts. What could go wrong.  
11
Akiasakias 21 hr ago +3
Tell that to OBL
3
Anxiety_Fit 1 day ago +28
Why they always stirring the pot? Past performance something something future fuckery?
28
Time-Weekend-8611 1 day ago +42
Because if the conflict ends, so does the gravy train. It's in Pakistan's interest to keep any conflicts that they're tangentially involved in going as long as possible.
42
marshalist 23 hr ago +6
The gravey train concept is for US audiences. Pakistani strategic goals are not dependent on US political squabbling.
6
pineapplesuit7 1 day ago +21
Their whole way of survival is handouts. For that to happen, they need constant turmoil in the region so US becomes involved and they use their bases to run their operations. That was literally their whole role in the Afgan war where they egged US to find Bin Laden by bombing it only to have him sheltered on their military bases for years. Even this diplomacy stunt is to keep them in their good books so the next IMF loan passes or they’ll need to sell some more assets to China otherwise.
21
FlacidPhil 1 day ago +14
Being the world police is awesome. 10 more wars! 10 more wars!
14
Raccoon_Ratatouille 23 hr ago +4
Bold of you to assume the Pakistani govt and military is competent enough to pull that off
4
TheHomersapien 23 hr ago +14
And Obama did nothing. Then Trump took office and his first overseas trip was to...England? Germany? Israel? Nope. Straight to his Wahhabi terrorist pals in The Kingdom, where he partied, danced, and cosplayed Jihad. Now he has his Qatar bribe jet, crypto fraud, and is still selling strangely overpriced Trump properties to men in robes. The American government bends the knee to terrorist Islamic states and nobody really seems to care (in the U.S., anyway).
14
SignorJC 21 hr ago +32
> And Obama did nothing. i mean he did authorize the strike that killed bin laden without informing them, so not exactly nothing.
32
Vegetable_Maize_2054 1 day ago +136
How weird is this shit? Pakistan has jets in Saudi Arabia to protect against Iran but then is protecting Iranian jets.
136
Royal-Hunter3892 1 day ago +703
Deja vu moment.! Similar situation happened before They were major non nato ally of America, they took billions of dollars from US for fighting against taliban and Al qaeda, but they played "double game" with US by sheltering and providing safe havens to them especially to "OBL". Here's what Trump said In his tweet about Pakistan in his first term . Donald J Trump The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools. They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more! 1 Jan 2018.
703
BendicantMias 1 day ago +309
>thinking of our leaders as fools. They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more! Well he's not wrong. It's just that he's the fool now. He's even proved it by them doing it to him too now.
309
Royal-Hunter3892 1 day ago +120
The fact that the American president Trump has put the US in a position where he has to take assistance and rely on "pakistan" for a face saving offramp from the iran conflict is in itself a big humiliation and a downfall. US pakistan are like a couple trapped in a obsessive toxic relationship. First they become FWB , but then they start abusing and hurting each other , then they break up .then after some time they agree to become FWB and the cycle repeats .
120
Alone_Again_2 1 day ago +24
I guess the simple math is friends with nukes are preferable to enemies with nukes.
24
BendicantMias 23 hr ago +29
The US supported Pakistan during the Cold War even before it had nuclear weapons. Realpolitik has no place for friendship, only utility. Pakistan was a 'friend' cos the US was hostile to India then, and in fact to the whole Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) project.
29
Worth-Lead-5944 23 hr ago +15
You have that backwards. Pakistan wasn't befriended because the US was hostile to India. The US had no intention of being hostile to India, it sought to use Pakistan as part of its containment strategy vs the USSR and accidentally found itself aligned against India as a byproduct of coordinating with Pakistan.
15
veeyo 21 hr ago +14
I hate Trump but agree fully with that tweet from 2018.
14
Hector_P_Catt 1 day ago +125
Pakistan is the poster child for why places like North Korea and Iran want nuclear weapons. After 9/11, Afghanistan was invaded and occupied for helping Al Qaeda, while Pakistan, which was just as dirty, got billions in aid. The difference? The Bomb.
125
Hjem_D 1 day ago +56
not to mention their chief scientist gave tech to Iran and North Korea.
56
SeaworthinessSome454 1 day ago +29
It’s no secret that having a nuke is a good thing for your country. That doesn’t mean we should let everyone have one.
29
Hector_P_Catt 21 hr ago +21
The problem is the notion that we can just "let" countries have nukes, or not "let" them have them as we see fit. The reality is a bit more difficult, as Trump should be discovering about now, but probably isn't. North Korea was one of the poorest and most isolated countries in the world, and yet they managed to build a bomb. Sanctions can only do so much, and as we're seeing, the military alternative isn't a cake walk.
21
SeaworthinessSome454 20 hr ago +3
Yeah, the military option isn’t a cakewalk but it’s a hell of a lot better than letting a country that has said they want to destroy your country for nearly 50 years get a nuclear bomb. There’s no good options here, only less terrible
3
Crimson_Marksman 5 hr ago +2
You can't really stop a country from trying to make one unless you do a full on invasion. Despite the sanctions, North Korea got it's nuke.
2
385727883419 3 hr ago +1
The fact that Americans think they should be the ones to "let" or not "let" other countries have nuclear sovereignty is precisely why every country should have a dozen nukes or so, and missiles that can reach the continental US.
1
Time-Weekend-8611 1 day ago +99
Pakistan has a whole business model built around playing the US for a sucker. It's possibly their single largest source of revenue. Ever since George Bush's war on terror, each incoming US President has believed that Pakistan "is with us" that *this time* they could be counted on to do what the US wants of them and by the time the sitting President grows disillusioned, their term is over and a new President comes in, and the whole cycle starts all over again. Every single time it ends the same way and yet the US never learns. Pakistan *will* stab the US in the back, *always.* Because if they don't the conflict gets wrapped up in the US' favor and as soon as the conflict is wrapped up, the gravy train to Pakistan ends. So it is in their best interests to keep conflicts going as long as possible. Because as long as that's happening, they're a needed US ally and that comes with privileges and favors - privileges and favors like the US turning a blind eye to Pakistan sponsoring terrorist groups to deploy against India.
99
ShakethatYam 22 hr ago +20
Meanwhile India: "They can't keep getting away with this!"
20
DescriptionOld6832 18 hr ago +14
Been happening for way longer than Bush. We've been giving billions to Pakistan since the 70s. They've been playing us for fools since the 70s.
14
evange 1 day ago +17
That sounds way too coherent to be a trump quote.
17
borkmeister 1 day ago +26
Look at his tweets/Truths from 2015, 2020, and then now and you'll see a pretty interesting pattern. They are becoming more and more like the tone and rhetoric of his speech; I think he started with aides tweeting for him, but now we are getting things direct from the source.
26
Jordan_Jackson 1 day ago +17
You have to remember that this is Trump in 2018. That’s 8 years ago. That’s a long time for dementia/Alzheimer’s or whatever he has, to wreak havoc. I’m not going to say that the things he was saying were smart but he was a lot more coherent and able to formulate ideas and sentences back then. Watch Trump talk back then vs now and you will see a stark contrast in cognition and overall body language.
17
LastXmasIGaveYouHSV 20 hr ago +3
Donald "Broken Clock" Trump.
3
Draano 23 hr ago +2
> The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools. They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more! Didn't he also invite the Taliban to Camp David for secret talks?
2
bestestopinion 1 day ago +413
Is this the same Pakistan who hosted Osama Bin Laden?
413
innocent_bystander 23 hr ago +99
Also gave shelter to the Taliban post 9/11.
99
Longjumping-Bat8347 1 day ago +198
Yes. The same Pakistan that had Govt officials attend a terrorist’s funeral along with fellow terrorists and head of a banned organisation, yet insisted they were civilians.
198
socalwrxx 1 day ago +15
And the same Osama Bin Laden who was part of the mujahideen funded, well equiped, and trained by the CIA ?
15
wellwaffled 1 day ago +58
That was decades before 9/11 when he was usefully fighting the Russians, not American civilians.
58
BendicantMias 1 day ago +31
The point is he's another example of how Americas' fuckery abroad keeps coming back to bite it in the ass eventually. Even Iran is an example of that actually - [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953\_Iranian\_coup\_d%27%C3%A9tat](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat)
31
Mara_avs01 1 day ago +167
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan%E2%80%93NATO\_relations](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan%E2%80%93NATO_relations) Isnt Pakistan a major non nato ally and is presently a negotiatior? How does this even work.
167
yuikkiuy 1 day ago +140
They are a strategic ally but have always been a major ideological foe, this has not changed ever. And are mainly relevant due to having nukes and as a check against India during the cold war.
140
Wheres_my_wank_sock 1 day ago +80
Let's also not forget that the bulk of the fertilizer used to make IEDs also came from Pakistan during the war in Afghanistan.
80
marshalist 1 day ago +9
How many IEDs were made with fertiliser? This sounds like US claims during the Iraq war that Iran was supplying bits and bobs for IEDs. I remember when that was in the news cycle with photos of blankets with said bits and bobs (used) there was a report that the US had lost 125000 small arms in Iraq. Where they went well who can know these things.
9
jaa101 1 day ago +36
> How does this even work. Well if there was a declared war then a neutral nation would find harbouring the military assets of a combatant nation to be a problem, as in, risking its status as neutral. But, as it's only a special military operation, it's much less clear. All the traditional rules and conventions are out the window with the Orange Entity anyway, and his attitude reverses twice weekly, so who knows.
36
BendicantMias 1 day ago +21
If this was a declared war, then said war would be already over by now as it hasn't been authorized by Congress post the 60 days limit. *But ofc that war is already over now!* The US is now in the ***second undeclared war*** \- *with the same nation that it was just in an undeclared war with the previous day!*
21
PiotrekDG 1 day ago +5
Aren't undeclared wars fun? This message was brought to you by the military-industrial complex.
5
ChangsManagement 1 day ago +4
I suspect some anonymous Pakistani official will be buying a lot of Trump coin soon
4
TraditionalAlps722 1 day ago +3
As a neutral mediator it makes complete sense to provide a neutral shelter imo. Proves commitment to peaceful resolution. As long as Iranian jets arent taking off and taking part in operations i dont see anything wrong with it.
3
huangsede69 18 hr ago +1
Yes, it's a reflection of either incompetency and disagreement at the highest levels of their own government or it is an actual example of 4D chess. They are playing all sides, which any good middle power country basically has to do. They have to balance security and relationships with Iran, Saudi, US, India, and Russia effectively surrounding them. Not to mention at soft state of war with Afghanistan. No choice but to get crafty.
1
imthefakeagent 1 day ago +42
Sounds like free fighter jets for Pakistan?
42
BendicantMias 1 day ago +37
They aren't gonna steal them lol. The last thing Pakistan wants is its own war with Iran when it's already dealing with the oil shock from the US' war, a stalemated potential forever war with Afghanistan, and an ever more assertive India ready to hit back at Pakistan for all the shit they pull against it. Even its patron China would be against them doing that.
37
deja-roo 22 hr ago +11
Iran cannot afford a conflict with Pakistan. You have this all backwards. The only thing holding up Pakistan is its ongoing conflict with the Taliban, which is getting more protracted than they expected. Tehran has no ability to project military force across its Pakistani border at this point and doesn't need *another* nation itching to drop bombs on it.
11
imthefakeagent 1 day ago +9
I mean if Iran never comes to collect as with Iraqi jets in Iran, who's gonna stop them from being claimed?
9
FirstDagger 23 hr ago +10
Pakistan already has miles better jets than this, they don't need them.
10
akmalhot 1 day ago +83
Good thing the US spent the last 7 decades siding with Pakistan over india
83
SinistralGuy 23 hr ago +14
Have we not learned that US alliances mean nothing? They've been threatening NATO allies for the past year.
14
Intrepid_Top_2300 23 hr ago +21
Pakistan? You mean Trumps buddies in the negotiations? Who would have guessed that?
21
nvgroups 1 day ago +39
Pak is the epicenter of double game. Western powers poured billions and got nothing
39
Moriar-T 9 hr ago +3
The Pakistanis got nothing as well. Oligarchs stashed it overseas
3
Zanina_wolf 11 hr ago +2
Even the Chinese government disliked them. During some confrontation between US and Chinese diplomats over Chinese support for Pakistan, one of them sarcastically remarked that "pakistan to us is what Israel is to the US"
2
yaknowdadrill 22 hr ago +4
They learned a lot from the US and Israel
4
Mishka_1994 16 hr ago +9
The country that hosted Bin Laden and allowed the Taliban to operate from there is doing this this? Im shocked I tell you.... /s
9
Creepy-Bell-4527 1 day ago +48
Why do we pretend these people are our allies when they take advantage and laugh at us at every turn?
48
TwoMarc 1 day ago +48
You could make the same statement about the USA.
48
Segull 22 hr ago +18
No idea man, after they hid Osama from us we should have cut relations (and definitely all aid). They are playing us and are not our ally
18
shu-to 1 day ago +4
Friends don't let friends get their jets blown up while helping their other friends end the war or some such nonsense.
4
Pumpkins_Are_Fruits 14 hr ago +4
Like we give a f***
4
ImaRiskit 21 hr ago +6
Not a shocker at all. Most of the terrorists in Afghanistan when I was working there from 2013-2019 came across the border from Pakistan into Afghanistan.
6
WeakBlueberry5071 1 day ago +8
But they was oblitneianreted!! 😠 ^/s
8
Trid1977 1 day ago +4
The peace talks are being mediated through Pakistan. How neutral is Pakistan?
4
_x_oOo_x_ 1 day ago +27
Will be interesting to see if the Americans will shy away from striking Pakistan or not. After all it's a country with a nuclear arsenal
27
BendicantMias 1 day ago +26
Nukes or no nukes, *you want Trump to start a war with yet another country?* Hasn't he messed up enough?
26
Kind_Silver_1921 22 hr ago +9
Listnookors be like war is evil And then when Trump doesn't bomb civilians after he said he was going to, they make fun of him and call him taco
9
ineververify 22 hr ago +2
It has Nukes so it’s a legit sovereign country. Otherwise see: Ukraine, Iran.
2
DDoubleDDog 1 day ago +13
Pakistan is a state sponsor of terrorism and deserves to be sanctioned and boycotted.
13
Worth-Lead-5944 22 hr ago +7
The US is a state sponsor of Pakistan and...
7
DDoubleDDog 21 hr ago +7
Pakistan is a state sponsor of terrorism. I'm not going to let you change the subject.
7
Full_Reputation_7419 21 hr ago +13
I think you missed the point here, he's not disagreeing with you. Let's accept your premise, if you sponsor something then you're responsible for it and that Pakistan sponsors terror. Sure, fine, no arguments there. We create a chain and responsibility flows up the chain. You're saying the chain goes Pakistan -> Terror groups The problem is that the US funds and supports Pakistan. Everyone agrees on that. It's in the official US budget. It's above the table. The chain is objectively United States -> Pakistan -> Terror groups That means that if we're accepting all of your points as uncontested, if we're agreeing that sponsoring = responsibility and that Pakistan = state sponsor of terrorism, then we have a problem.
13
toronto1572 22 hr ago +2
Very interesting… considering Pakistan has some kind of defense agreement with Saudi Arabia…… wonder what kind of background deals are going on…. No wonder the UAE is willing to attack with jets .
2
Kreidler 1 day ago +5
Pakistan is in da bag 🍇
5
cursortoxyz 23 hr ago +6
PILOT, GRAPE! 🍇🇵🇰
6
Niceguy955 21 hr ago +5
Just like they let Bin Laden park his ass in their country while the US spent years looking for him in the Afghanistan tunnels. Pakistan received funds and support from the US for years only to shiv it in the back. Now they're pretending they're a "neutral mediator".
5
Akiasakias 21 hr ago +3
The US would never attack into Pakistan. Oh wait...
3
BendicantMias 1 day ago +2
>Pakistan, while it played a diplomatic conduit between Tehran and Washington, reportedly allowed Iranian military planes to use its airfields as parking, following the outbreak of conflict in the Middle East, potentially shielding them from American and Israeli airstrikes. Tehran also parked some of its civilian aircraft in neighbouring Afghanistan, though it was not clear if military planes were among those flights, CBS News reported, quoting sources. >Sources told the American publication that Tehran moved several of its key defence assets to Pakistan Air Force Base in Nur Khan, located just outside Rawalpindi. The strategically important military installation, located near Islamabad, provided a secure shelter for Iran to protect its military and aviation assets while Pakistan officially mediated truce efforts between Tehran and Washington.
2
GoldenBowlerhat 22 hr ago +2
...but Spain, Italy, the UK, Germany: THEY are the bad allies, amirite?
2
StatisticianIll4425 23 hr ago +1
So, per Iran thinking, the US could take them out in Pakistan? Like Iran has done to anyone letting the US use their country for military bases?
1
Magical-Mycologist 21 hr ago +2
Pakistan has nukes. No one is f****** with them, and even if this is true watch the US do nothing about it. One more reason that countries around the world should seek the nuke. It truly keeps your sovereignty safe from the bully-powers.
2
RexRonny 1 day ago +1
Well worth to remember is that Pakistan has tribal areas outside government reach in in practice without jurisdiction. Nearby the Afgan border is the most well known. On both sides of the border. These areas are very hard to access due to mountainous terrain, lack of roads, infrastructure and general hostility to most outsiders; both domestic or foreign. These «wild west territories» been a safe haven for Taliban and other islamist warriors for years. Based on Tribal ruling, not governmental. These regions also operate as a country within their country; by both Afganistan and Pakistan and reject any governmental meddling.
1
BendicantMias 1 day ago +27
>Sources told the American publication that Tehran moved several of its key defence assets to Pakistan Air Force Base in Nur Khan, ***located just outside Rawalpindi***. The strategically important military installation, ***located near Islamabad***, This is very much within the Pakistani govts. control. Irans' planes are there with their blessing.
27
hastinapur 22 hr ago +1
American non NATO ally with president’s favorite field marshal
1
abeBroham-Linkin 22 hr ago +1
Do those jets look like drones? 😑
1
HuckleberryHot4551 22 hr ago +1
Pakistan army will do anything for money.
1
← Back to Board