· 113 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 29, 2026 at 9:48 PM

Pakistan prepares to host peace talks as Iran accuses US of ground assault plans

Posted by shadOw_notch

🚩 Report this post

113 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
LittleKitty235 Mar 29, 2026 +245
The US deployed the 82nd airborne...of course we have ground attack plans. Why is that a question? All the way.
245
blazelet Mar 29, 2026 +108
Ahead of every invasion they do this. Deploy troops to the area, sending up media test balloons, before they do it. A ground invasion is 100% happening, only question I have is the scale.
108
LittleKitty235 Mar 29, 2026 +91
You can't move thousands of people and large amounts of military assets without people, especially other nations, noticing. They are probably going to try to seize the oil processing plants off the coast...as if Iran doesn't have them set to blow up already. This war is being run by talk show hosts and reality TV stars who employ angry teenagers to do their PR for them. I feel embarrassed for my friends and those in the military who has to serve under this leadership. We have the best military in the world run by morons
91
FirefighterLeft5425 Mar 29, 2026 +35
They could refuse orders. They have a duty to protect and defend the Constitution. Swore an oath. They have completely failed and have turned into a terrorist organization. Completely thrown our allies to the wind and threatened them with the full force of the United States military. Grew up with a Chief Master Sargent father, everyone in my family has been or is military. Whatever at this point.
35
LittleKitty235 Mar 29, 2026 +36
I don't like what is happening right now, or Trump in general. But I'm not sure exactly what order is illegal right now, mostly because the public is being told so little The bar to ignore illegal orders is high, and the penalty more so. I blame Congress for what is happen, it should not fall on the military to rein this in
36
FirefighterLeft5425 Mar 29, 2026 +12
Attacking public infrastructure is a war crime. Snatching foreign leaders in the middle of the night. Bombing 160+ girls. They have betrayed every single one of our allies, the rules of war openly. The forces have abandoned The People. The world is turning away from us while we commit yet another genocide. I'm over it.
12
LittleKitty235 Mar 29, 2026 +11
I doubt you a JAG officer and neither am I. I'm not confident enough anything you listed is an illegal order that I'd bet my freedom and career on. Shooting prisoners tends to be when it is clear. Once again, it is not up to the low level officers or enlisted to fix this. It is Congress
11
FirefighterLeft5425 Mar 29, 2026 +7
I'm sorry Congress failed years ago. As did every single institution that is currently being dismantled as we speak. The military has been infested with Trump sytrocats over the last 10 years with every single person with any integrity, morals, or honor has been pushed out and mocked. And even before that it was pushed to the gills with right wing ideology with Christian nationalism thrown in for fun. The entire system is gone. Also any JAG officer worth their salt was thrown out a long time ago. I'm allowed to have my opinions. I've had this shit forced down my throat my entire damn life. Thanks though.
7
NorthernerWuwu Mar 30, 2026
Well, if we were to look for a crystal clear example (and I do mean, literal example out of the US military doctrine manuals) it would be killing the wounded from a vessel they have sunk. Which they have done multiple times now. They didn't refuse those orders, they aren't refusing any others.
0
LittleKitty235 Mar 30, 2026 +2
When did that happen in Iran? Because South America is not close I do agree with you that people need to go to prison for that nonsense, but its another topic.
2
NorthernerWuwu Mar 30, 2026 +1
Well no, it didn't happen in Iran or at least not yet. I think it is relevant though to a discussion of what might happen in Iran if illegal orders were given. Damned if I know though, I'm sort of inserting myself into your existing conversation.
1
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 -4
[removed]
-4
FirefighterLeft5425 Mar 30, 2026 +2
I just explained it. I don't like traitors. Have a wonderful day.
2
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026
[removed]
0
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 -1
[removed]
-1
[deleted] Mar 30, 2026 +1
[removed]
1
Lazy-Gene-7284 Mar 30, 2026 -5
They can’t refuse a presidents order , that’s not possible so don’t blame them .
-5
International_Goat31 Mar 30, 2026 +1
It's ***absolutely*** possible. They can, at any time, refuse literally any order they want to. They have free will. Every single one of the people going there had (*and still has)* that choice and is actively deciding that they are more comfortable participating in an invasion than going to prison. We've seen the US bomb schools, killing well over a hundred children. We've seen the US and Israel bomb oil sites around Tehran resulting in poisonous and acidic black rain falling on civilians. We've seen the US president threaten to destroy Iranian power plants, which power homes, schools, and hospitals. The whole world can feel the skyrocketing oil prices. This isn't like Iraq where everyone was all hopped up on 9/11 and the US, early on, had the rest of the developed world convinced that they were an imminent threat. Everyone sees what is happening here. It's all on video. These people have, entirely of their own free will, chosen to participate. They **should** be judged for that decision.
1
pgtl_10 Mar 30, 2026 +3
Western media loves to twist things.
3
PilgrimOz Mar 30, 2026 +3
‘Accuses’ should be ‘acknowledges’
3
Ytrewq9000 Mar 30, 2026 +4
Pakistan wants $$ from the U.S. There’s no freaking way they are doing this “for free.”
4
3rd-party-intervener Mar 29, 2026 -5
It’s not that many people.  So not a full invasion.   Probably get that oil island in question 
-5
hadoken12357 Mar 29, 2026 +390
Why would Iran believe a single word out of the US and Israel?
390
znmae Mar 29, 2026 +165
especially sunday night when the futures market just opened up. this is about calming market fears more than actually solving shit. edit: and so far it isnt working. s&p futures down and crude futures up
165
Actual__Wizard Mar 30, 2026 +42
Homie, they distributed invasion plans to like 50k troops and that all leaked all over the internet. They can lie all they want... People that analyze markets can see it...
42
znmae Mar 30, 2026 +16
youd think so but this market was wildly optimistic and believing trumps bullshit at the start of the war. check it if you don't believe. the first monday after it started, the market went up iirc
16
Actual__Wizard Mar 30, 2026 +16
Well, I mean, we're all watching the "nightmare train wreck disaster scenario" that we warned everybody about. So, if the troops go in, it's going to be a massive escalation of the war. If the US goes home, then there could be a massive escalation of the war. And if they US holds position, then there could be a massive escalation of the war. In p**** terms: Let's see how Trump plays his cards after getting called, after he bet half of his chips on his hand with out looking at his cards. I don't know if you play p****, but what Trump is doing looks like, the same thing as when drunk people make dumb moves like the above. I mean obviously they're thinking that when they do that, that nobody is going to call because it's a weird play, and they'll just steal the ante, but that's not how p**** works and that play only makes sense after 6 beers.
16
Wide__Stance Mar 30, 2026 +6
It’s not a bad analogy, but it only works if you assume the objective of the p**** player is winning the game. What if the p**** player is just a degenerate gambler who mostly cares about playing p****? What if it wasn’t about winning or losing or breaking even, but simply the act of playing? That’s what we’ve got here: a bunch of psychopaths we collectively call “Trump” or “Israel” or whatever, whose sole objective was war with Iran. Warhawks, defense contractors, religious fanatics, people whose image of Iran (and entire fundamental system of thought) is unchanged in 45 years, the paranoid, the gullible. It’s not that they didn’t have a plan or that there wouldn’t be consequences. Their plan worked. Flawlessly. There will be no consequences to them, personally, and probably none collectively; they haven’t faced consequences for their actions before, so why would that happen now? “War with Iran” **was the goal**. They got what they wanted (and now the moneyed class will make lots of money off it, both directly and indirectly).
6
RPO777 Mar 30, 2026 +5
Well part of the problem is ghe situation has radically changes. Iran was uncertain of its ability to close the strait of Hormuz. They were reportedly surprised by how easy it was and how readily they've maintained the blockade. Now Iran wants US recognition of its "ownership" of the strait and Iranian Parkiament is moving forward legislation to charge ships $2M per ship to transit the strait, which could bring in billions of dollars that Iran will badly need to rebuild its military infrastructure after the war. It would also be a major blow to the economies of Iran's geopolitical foes in Saudi and the gulf states amd reshape the geopolitics of the Middle East IN Iran's favor. So the US could accept a massively strengthened Iran that dominates the Middle East geopolitically... or it could launch a ground invasion.
5
Wide__Stance Mar 30, 2026 +1
But that’s my point: for Trump and Israel, there *is* no problem. The very real situation you present is win/win for them. Their only goal of the US is “war with Iran.” They’ve already got that. A ground invasion is like bonus points to these ghouls. And a tax on ships through the Straits? Short term it means higher oil prices. That means higher *American* oil prices. It also means record profits in shipping & logistics — not the little businesses, but the ones traded on Wall Street. The astronomical increase in insuring oil tankers is passed on to consumers, not capitalists. That’s not to mention the profits that will be generated, both short and long term, by the usual suspects — weapons manufacturers, mercenaries calling themselves “security contractors,” anyone dealing arms to theocratic monarchies, etc — it also means investment in tech companies, data centers, the aerospace sector. It’s good for the media, lobbyists, think tanks, the consultant class (my personal conspiracy theory is that it’s the consultants who are most responsible for the degradation, at all levels from the neighborhoods to nationally, more than any other group). Netanyahu has suggested at least twice in the last week, that I know of, that the Gulf Nations should build a new export pipeline through Israel and bypass the Straits of Hormuz entirely. Worst case scenario for Israel (realistically)? Iran becomes another failed state like Syria or Iraq. I don’t know if they’d actually be any safer, but **they** seek to think so. So, yeah: if you assume their goals are war in the short term and profits in the long term, then they’ve already succeeded beyond their wildest imaginations. It’s really not so far-fetched. It’s not like the United Staes is afraid of losing a war or being seen as a paper tiger. I’m not being facetious about that. We’ve been at war continuously for the last eighty years and we haven’t won yet. Winning wars has never been on the agenda. Fighting wars is always at the top.
1
RPO777 Mar 30, 2026 +2
I do'nt doubt this war is Netanyahu's wildest dreams come true. But a pipeline through Israel isn't a serious suggestion and Netanyahu is fully aware of that--the Gulf States may work together with Saudi Arabia to expand the pipelines the Saudis already contructed to the Red Sea--I could see Kuwait or UAE and the Saudis working together in that way maybe. but there's little benefit to building a pipeline that runs through Israel to the Meditteranean, especially when a pipeline already exists through Saudi Arabia. That's not even getting into the geopolitics of Gulf States voluntarily handing their eocnomic lifeline to Isreal, which they would do exactly never if they had any other alternative (much less a much financially cheaper and less geopolitically oneours one) I'm less convinced Trump understood what he was getting himself into. If there's one thing Trump cares about more than money, it's basking in adulation. Very few things turn conserviates against Trump, but between CPAC attendees cheering the idea of a Trump impeachment, the isolationist wing of conservatives turning on him on Fox News, and being left in a situation where he has to either double down into a strategic quagmire or essentially surrender to Iran, I have my doubt Trump understood that any of this was going to happen (even though most people who understood the complexities of going to war with Iran literlaly predicted all of this was a realistic possibility before the war started).
2
NorthernerWuwu Mar 30, 2026 +1
The 'tax', should it actually become the norm, is about a buck a barrel for a supertanker, a bit more for smaller, a bit less for bigger. A dollar a barrel isn't nothing but companies will pay it.
1
Actual__Wizard Mar 30, 2026 +1
I 100% agree with everything you said, except the outcome. I think their plan is guaranteed to fail. The question is "when?"
1
UnknownAverage Mar 30, 2026 +7
Eh, Trump either picked Apr 6th to surprise attack on the 5th, or much earlier because he thinks that would be a surprise. But I think he really needed to buy time for mobilization.
7
rajastrums_1 Mar 30, 2026 +4
I'll bet the evangelicals are clamoring for an Easter war.
4
devonhezter Mar 30, 2026 +1
What stock to buy ??
1
pass_nthru Mar 29, 2026 +17
they don’t, and it will be a contested landing if LCACs hit the beach which will not be great for the poor jarheads in the 11th & the 31st
17
AusToddles Mar 29, 2026 +22
That is a sacrifice Trump is willing to make
22
Murray38 Mar 29, 2026 +8
Idk I bet Iran can definitely believe it whenever they say dumb things like sending over ground troops. A good rule of thumb is that if it’ll hurt America and cost money, they’ll follow through on it now.
8
pichael288 Mar 29, 2026 +30
Accuses? They said it on national news, we aren't trying to hide our transgressions anymore. Not only is it unnecessary to hide your misdeeds, they are actively celebrated in this cult of personality.
30
Definitelyhereforshi Mar 29, 2026 +75
The US: We will literally put troops in the ground in Iran Reuters: Iran accuses US of ground invasion plans
75
lollythepop7 Mar 29, 2026 +64
Pakistan is in such a tough spot. Have to maintain security pact with Saudi Arabia but also not fight against Iran to which it also seeks good relations with. Pakistan would rather that Iran and the GCC not fight.
64
Cetun Mar 29, 2026 +29
Isn't Pakistan also in a low level conflict with Afghanistan also?
29
lollythepop7 Mar 29, 2026 +33
Yep it is, but again a war that it doesn’t want, started by the Afghans. Pakistan has been requesting the Taliban government to not support terrorist groups but they simply continue, they escalated multiple times until it broke into a full scale invasion into Pakistani territory. Now there are reports that Pakistan has gained control over large swathes of land in eastern Afghanistan, likely for a buffer, hopefully.
33
the4thwave Mar 30, 2026 +3
Missed the part that Pakistan expelled around 2 million Afghans, including ones born in Pakistan, out of their country.
3
BlueWermz Mar 29, 2026 +16
Pakistan and Afghanistan were always destined to be at war due to the Durand Line dispute. The Taliban is no different from all the previous Afghan governments in that they will always see the Pashtun areas of Pakistan as rightfully theirs. Pakistan is indeed in a tough spot: -tensions with India to the east. -war with the Taliban to the northwest. -spillover from the Iran War and a resurgence of Baloch separatist activity in the southwest. -a rise of Sindhudesh sentiment in the southeast.
16
devonhezter Mar 30, 2026 +2
Taliban should host negotiations
2
lollythepop7 Mar 29, 2026 -7
Pakistan, like it’s cricket team, has the ability to turn an impossible situation into a crushing victory lol. It punches way above its weight. Besides India none of these problems are because of pakistan itself. If the right government does come into power (like Imran Khan’s party) they would make reconciliations with the Balochs who believe me have valid reasons for their hatred, because of our government. They would give rights of Sui natural gas reserves to the Balochs like they deserve and increase investment in Balochistan. They have been wrongfully ignored. Sindhudesh is simply indian propaganda, there is not much basis to that idea and a Sindhi party has ruled pak for like half of its existence so it’s a moot point. Afghanistan is a more difficult situation than India because they don’t want to believe in reason or negotiations of any kind. They claim to be muslims when muslims fighting against each other is unironically haram. They blow up mosques and markets when they don’t get their way. Unfortunately, I think a strategic buffer is the best way they can be dealt with. Pakistani has tried to play the adult with them many times but they don’t like it that way. India is obviously the biggest problem. It’s 7x of Pakistan in every metric, 5th biggest economy and most populous country on Earth, yet we’ve managed to win many wars against them or atleast keep them off off pakistani territory in the ones we lost. In the two most recent encounters our pilots downed Indian planes both times through strategic depth and incredible mastery of the chain by the Air force. We’ll do fine lol.
-7
kmadnow Mar 30, 2026 +15
> yet we’ve managed to win many wars against them Name one mate
15
Neebaadentira Mar 30, 2026 +11
They cant. They're brainwashed to believe in their military otherwise they have to face the uncomfortable truth that their military is the cause of all problems.
11
colddiggers Mar 30, 2026 +8
most countries have an army. Pakistan’s army has a country
8
selfiecat Mar 30, 2026 +4
You are neither watching cricket nor has your country won anything
4
tamal4444 Mar 30, 2026 +5
Which war did you win?
5
SpookyScaryySkeleton Mar 30, 2026 +6
Lost 65, 71, 99. Got most of your runways destroyed last year. So which one did you win again?
6
krazybanana Mar 30, 2026
Get out bot
0
krazybanana Mar 30, 2026 +2
Random Imran Khan plug lmao that nutcase should be kept as far away from government as possible. Dumbass was so bad the army had to pull him out right after they installed him.
2
FatTater420 Mar 30, 2026 +1
I honestly can't tell if Imran Khan was the Pakistani Trump or Trump is the American Imran Khan.
1
krazybanana Mar 30, 2026 +1
They're both equally delusional fs
1
tamal4444 Mar 30, 2026 +3
"Pakistan has been requesting the Taliban government" oh the irony.
3
Sea_Substance_921 Mar 30, 2026 +3
Haha, peak irony!!🤣 Pak requesting another country not to support terrorism
3
PermianExtinction Mar 30, 2026 +2
The war was started by Pakistan, and they housed and funded the Taliban for 20 years. Pakistan deserves all their karma for how they’ve enabled the Taliban.
2
Da_Spooky_Ghost Mar 29, 2026 -5
And Pakistan just had a bad scuffle with India. Bets were that the first nuclear exchange between 2 countries would be between India and Pakistan.
-5
lollythepop7 Mar 29, 2026 +21
As much as we hate each other, both pakistan and India military are quite responsible in de-escalating tensions lol
21
kitsunegoon Mar 30, 2026 -2
I wonder why...
-2
RavensQueen502 Mar 30, 2026 +4
Practice. A lot
4
kitsunegoon Mar 30, 2026 +1
I was thinking nukes
1
ShoutOfDawn Mar 29, 2026 -14
if only iran would stop bombing their neighbors, i genuinely dont know what the hope to gain by bombing hotels, powerplants and ports of countries that are not attacking them. and before someone says american bases, the GOP is pissy that arab states are joing the attack, that lindsy graham is demanding to pull US bases from the region, lol, staliate maps are showing most assets are moved from american bases its only complicates the negations, and it gives the impression there's no leadership that organizes the war in iran, and that commanders are attacks the countries they hate the most, which if true, means no peace until the Iranian regime rebuilds itself
-14
lollythepop7 Mar 29, 2026 +8
I honestly find the Iranians to be more predictable than the Americans at this point. It seems that Iran is simply attacking the gulf to push the US to end the war and sending oil soaring for the same reason. Iran wants a definitive end to aggression against it, meanwhile the GOP either wants a win or a temporary ceasefire to regroup and restock the military. This is why Iran will prolong the war to prevent any future attacks while trump will not back down and launch a ground invasion to save face. This is completely a lose-lose war and it will be a very troubling defeat to the US if it does have to lose. The biggest losers are the gulf states who have their image of safety and being a tourist financial hub completely shattered.
8
ShoutOfDawn Mar 29, 2026 -4
believe me, the US and israel are the biggest terror states in my eyes, and israel is reposnible for genocide in gaza, but the idea that iran is innocnet or what they are doing is just is horrfying, its like shooting the children of your enemies to desuade further attacks. anyone with a shred of knowledge about conflicts knows that if arab states can gain peace quickly through negations, then its best to bear the pain and finish iran once and for all, like israel tried with gaza. civilians don't win here. but states gain ideological and finacial wins here, Iranian oil and gas being out of the picture is long term win for arab states, and Iran is doing everything to justifying their entrance into the conflict.
-4
lollythepop7 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Well I definitely agree that finishing off Iran will be great for the gulf regardless of how moral or not that would be lol, but it’s simply not practical. Iran has shown that it can basically survive anything. The US lost in Afghanistan but Iran is 4 times the territory of Afghanistan and is actually a very powerful country with a robust economy and educated people. It’s simply not possible. I won’t be surprised if the US fails capture an inch of Mainland Iran. And no one is ready for that kind of defeat. And regarding the Gulf, I think if they were practical in any sense, they would prepare to negotiate with Iran regardless of what they think of them, as qatar has already done in a way, they have retreated from the conflict entirely.
1
ShoutOfDawn Mar 29, 2026 -1
if iran doesnt let off on drone attacks it would not be a question of practicality, saudi arabias war with the houthis was not practical, but it happened. arab states, which includes syria nd jordan in this conflict, are faced with the question if there is anyone to enforce a peace deal in iran. and if a total regime/ state collapse is beater for long term regional peace. none of these possiblities are good for the average iranian. for now everyone is calling for peace in the region excpet israel, but that may change as soon as torrow.
-1
lollythepop7 Mar 30, 2026 +1
Well what I’m saying that Iran will not collapse as a result of this war and might even emerge stronger in its position regionally. It is not wise for them to anger the Iranian regime now. If they attack now or attack later, they will be entering a losing war and put their people, industry and investments in their countries in danger and I honestly doubt they would do that. If they really do value their country, they would try to reconcile their differences or atleast have an understanding of non aggression with Iran. And I honestly think the Houthi situation is different. The Houthis are a few hundred kilometers from one of the major Saudi cities so it was a critical situation for them. Iran is not the same way just like Lebanon and others weren’t for Saudi Arabia.
1
temujin94 Mar 29, 2026 +5
They're engaging in economic warfare. These places make money from their resources and tourism so they're bombing both. They want to pressure Trump's middle Eastern allies to come to him with requests to end the war because Iran can see nobody else is going go be involved in Trump's quagmire. They're playing the war much better than the US which means the US are actually considering making their biggest military blunder since Vietnam. Their choices are a lot of dead soldiers or abandoning the war (Trump will say he won it).
5
ShoutOfDawn Mar 29, 2026 -4
yeah, that terrorism. i know the idea behind the attacks. it is not justibale here nor when israel was bombing gaza saying we are only bombing you guys because of hamas, so topple hamas and give us the hostages and we will stop. some thing people ignore is that arab staes patinece is not infinte, daily attacks on oil, power and airports are raising peoples voices to retaliate. if they see that there no point in seeking a peace deal, then entering the war and bearing some longer term cost is worth removing iran as a local threat once and for all, israel manged to cripple iran with 200 aircrafts, arab states have 1000+, if they eneter it would be utter devation for iranians,
-4
temujin94 Mar 29, 2026
They're calculating they're not going to enter though and this is going to force the US's hand. I'm sure if the US stops killing Iranian citizens Iran will stop bombing civilian targets. That's how wars go, Iran so far hasn't done anything the belligerent hasn't done.
0
ShoutOfDawn Mar 29, 2026
well people are acting as if not all three belligerent arent terrorists, people dont understand that if iranians keep attacking civilians , some of their neighbors might think iran ceasing to exist is the better option for their peace. arab states arent being bombed by israel or the US, they are dragged into the war by iran
0
temujin94 Mar 29, 2026 +1
No I think you've made that part up for the vaat najority of people. Iran has the world's biggest military between the balls with the choices between invading and being toppled domestically or turning tail and removing themselves from the conflict. The Arab states can't do anything worthwhile to Iran and Iran has several ways to escalate even further if they do. The US and Israel is 95% of the power there and Iran are quite happy to pressure the 5% to go begging to the US to end the war. I honestly can't believe you're questioning why Iran is doing this when it's been a resounding success so far.
1
JunkReallyMatters Mar 30, 2026 -4
That was a brilliant move by Saudis btw.
-4
daanishh Mar 30, 2026 +1
Which one? What did I miss?
1
JunkReallyMatters Mar 30, 2026
Signing a mutual defense pact with Pakistan which was and is desperate for injection of cash into its economy.  Although Iran welcomed it when it was signed, it now places Pakistan in the awkward position of defending the Saudis against Iran’s missiles and drone attacks if the Saudis choose to call on them to do it.
0
Kapowpow Mar 29, 2026 +8
Peace talks are just a stall tactic. The Iranian delegation is just as likely to get struck by a bomb than met with.
8
uknownix Mar 29, 2026 +10
The US are trying to make their hand stronger... I just hope Israel doesn't succeed in stopping the negotiations. The last thing they want is peace or pause.
10
kiyomoris Mar 29, 2026 +21
To host peace talks when we all know who started this and should take full responsibility for it. It's theatre.
21
jarena009 Mar 29, 2026 +23
We just knocked out their power in Tehran. What peace talks lol
23
Impressive_Sale6776 Mar 30, 2026 +11
and murdered the new ayatollah’s wife with his dad. The US leadership is absolutely sick and no better than terrorists. Pete Kegsbreath is a raging Christian extremist salivating to kill Muslims. These are psychopaths.
11
RareBid Mar 29, 2026 +8
Hmmm they were already in peace talks before the war but the US and Israel went ahead and attacked Iran anyways so not sure how much good this is going to do especially if there are actors that want this war continue.
8
floydiankabir Mar 30, 2026 +2
Stop Pakistan or you’ll end up stealing the novel prize from trump
2
bliss19 Mar 29, 2026 +6
Never guessed that PAKISTAN of all countries would be the grown up in the room
6
migoden Mar 30, 2026 +6
What part of India are you from ?
6
ihpihpk31334 Mar 30, 2026 +5
Delhi, scam call center
5
magnumopus44 Mar 29, 2026 +4
They are not. No one here is negotiating. This is simply their moment to appear relevant.
4
terrorblade1995 Mar 30, 2026 +2
Why do indians like you start crawling out of the woodwork whenever Pakistan is mentioned? India is just obsessed with Pakistan
2
tonic613 Mar 29, 2026 +2
The reception dinner will be amazing…. Pakistani and Persian dishes!
2
New_Home_4519 Mar 29, 2026
Accuses? You mean like when one country decides to wage war on another one?
0
uniklyqualifd Mar 30, 2026 +1
A ground assault probably means a worldwide recession. Trump's busy putting his ill-gotten billions in assets that will survive the recession.
1
BlueAndYellowTowels Mar 30, 2026 +1
This is nonsense. Iran is looking for peace because a peace deal is impossible at this point. They’re not going to give up their missiles. They’re not going to abandon the nuclear program at this point. And Israel wants to topple the regime and that’s never going to happen. The global economy will fall into a depression before the US imposes regime change in Iran.
1
Thin-Theory-4805 Mar 30, 2026 +1
Purely a tactic to keep us all in the belief that west is trying for peace, when their puppet state or the favourite field marshal will be forced to send in the troops. At this point i am 100% sure ground invasion will start from Pakistan.
1
No-Restaurant-8963 Mar 30, 2026 +1
by Team or Zoom meeting?
1
Embarrassed-Dust718 Mar 30, 2026 +1
Israel won’t let trump do any peace deals just yet
1
SuchProcedure4547 Mar 30, 2026 +1
Wtf happens when Israel bombs Pakistan because it can't resist the chance of killing a number of high ranking Iranian officials?
1
Foreign_Cable_9530 Mar 29, 2026 +1
Most likely going to see continued strikes and proxy escalation while talks stall or remain indirect. Possibly going to see some small scale ground operations to gain leverage in negotiations. Unlikely, but worst case is a full scale ground war. Neither side seems to want this, so I doubt it will happen but hopefully Pakistan and other countries can continue to act as mediators before we reach this point.
1
ForestRiver13 Mar 29, 2026 +1
The same pakistan that hid Osama bin Laden just half a mile away from their biggest military academy? Sure.
1
queefburritowcheese Mar 29, 2026 +1
What do they mean "accuses?" The Trump administration has all but officially confirmed it.
1
Icecum Mar 29, 2026 -1
Pakistan and Peace is oxymoron
-1
Marcysdad Mar 29, 2026 -1
Prepare Pakistan being bombed next.....like Qatar was during negotiations before
-1
adognow Mar 30, 2026 +1
Sure, other than the fact that Pakistan has both intermediate range missiles and nuclear warheads. 
1
Background_Cycle2985 Mar 29, 2026
dude. there will not be a ground invasion. it's a good way to get 50,000 people killed.
0
WARxxPIGG Mar 29, 2026 -1
Isn't Pakistan at war with Afghanistan? What is going on on this f****** planet
-1
ComfortablyPF Mar 30, 2026 -2
Pakistan and peace in the same sentence. Funny. Look at Pakistane in Europe...
-2
chodder111 Mar 30, 2026 -1
The same Pakistan that harboured Osama Bin Laden next to their military compound? Right.
-1
oldfogey12345 Mar 29, 2026 -3
Lol. What would make them think we had ground assault plans?
-3
FlicksBus Mar 29, 2026 -8
Hosting peace talks while they are themselves at war is a bold move.
-8
RichardPascoe Mar 30, 2026 -2
Probably a good time to remind people of the tactics used by the Taliban during the twenty years the Coalition was in control. People want safety and security and for twenty years the Taliban waged a bombing campaign against civilians. The Taliban were willing to kill thousands of their own people. Also note that the European country nearest to Iran is Russia. The reason there is sporadic fighting between Georgia and Russia is because Georgia was originally Iranian territory. The Georgians don't want to return to being part of Iran but they also don't want to be part of Russia. I am just saying that if America does remove the regime it will need to provide safety and security. The other option is to remove the regime and leave. The regime in Iran is finished but it is what happens afterwards that really matters.
-2
← Back to Board