We all know this is literally just two sleep-deprived PR interns negotiating international diplomacy on the timeline.
86
samples982 days ago
+21
It literally probably is this. “Hey one of you pretend to be the Pakistani President”
21
rbourbon2 days ago
+59
But I thought we couldn't trust even a signature from Biden because it was autopen?
59
Mobile-Base73871 day ago
+1
imagine using a tool to assist with a symbolic gesture, he should have been signing in blood with the bare nub of his finger worn raw or it's meaningless
1
lonefur2 days ago
+29
The comments are puzzling. The article does not talk about orange’s posts. Article talks about a different person.
29
Slight-Egg-37902 days ago
+33
It’s Listnook Bro most people don’t read
33
Obvious_Toe_30062 days ago
+5
..and most people are not people !
5
teachersecret2 days ago
+6
I’d say the implication here is that Pakistan is acting as a mouthpiece for the tangelo.
6
WittyCry43742 days ago
+19
This ceasefire is arguably one of the most confusing and poorly coordinated diplomatic agreements in history.
19
Iamhummus2 days ago
+11
I have a feeling they sent a different version to each party and hoped it will work itself out
11
Nextasy2 days ago
+3
It's incredible, I don't even think there was an actual body of text that was even agreed upon. And out of everybody involved, only the US and f****** Hezbollah seemed remotely interested in following it for even 2 seconds lmao
3
Royal-Hunter38922 days ago
+35
Pakistan was always a proxy of US but from the time Trump's second term began , he is using them overtly like a "Butler" .
35
ChickenMcFukket12 days ago
+19
The same Pakistan that was hiding Osama right next to a major base?
19
paone000222 days ago
+16
Not just any base it was the Pakistan military academy. Also the fact that CIA chose to not inform Pakistan once they found out Bin Laden was there and ran the whole capture operation without their knowledge.
Between their connections with Taliban and Al Qaeda, ISI can actually be called a rogue terrorist organization if we're being honest.
16
intricate_strands2 days ago
+5
How close is Trump to anyone that negatively impacted?
Can't even say "Republicans," because Trump gutted the party of anyone pre-Trump. And it's not like Trump would be offended by them doing so before he took control of the Republican party. Literally no one from the Republican party pre-Trump is in a political position aside from some judges.
As far as OBL is concerned, everyone at the American table of this is completely new.
5
navyblusheet2 days ago
+5
I mean this was obvious. Someone from Trump's side wrote it to give Trump an off ramp.
5
Zardoz_Wearing_Pants2 days ago
+3
wow, that's crazy, because I'm *certain* every single one of tRumps posts are from his slippery, greasy, tiny, blood soaked hands..
3
Sandman43442 days ago
+3
Almost seems as if there was a tweet coined by U.S. personnel given to Pakistani PM to act as the fake mediator to give Trump the off-ramp. The issue and where I am in agreement here is there was no official specifically agreed upon plans from anyone other than the 15 point plan and 10 point plans discussed during the days before the whole death to civilazation shit. This is why Trump is saying the plan the U.S. was working with and agreed to is different than what Iran said they agreed to. More of a capitulation from Trump to kick the can down the road in another episode of "concept of" something whether healthcare, peace plan between Israel and Palestine and now this. Also those Polymarket accounts created right before the announcement of the ceasefire "agreement" that netted some individuals hundreds of thousands of dollars look mighty suspicious.
3
wwarnout2 days ago
+12
How could he tell? Proper grammar, no misspelled words, minimal references to himself, complete sentences...no way Trump wrote it.
12
EFIW15602 days ago
+13
The tweet in question is the Pakistani PM tweet, not a tweet from trump.
13
PhDinDildos_Fedoras2 days ago
+6
In a negotiation, you'd want to draft your statements before hand and have everyone read and approve them.
6
Goose19632 days ago
+4
Michael Cohen said that he would have other people do all the groveling/negotiating and at the very end, when he thought they had extracted enough money, he loved to strut in a make a big show of signing the "Deal". Also, if there was anything from him that needed to be provided in the future, in his mind it wasn't even part of the deal, and he would do anything possible to NOT hold up his end of it.
4
TACO_Orange_30982 days ago
+4
if the words are spelled correctly and longer that 4 letters it wasn't trump
4
EFIW15602 days ago
+8
You're right it wasnt trump because the article is talking about the pakistan PM tweet not a trump tweet.
8
Hefty-Comparison-8012 days ago
-1
Were random words Capitalized, because If so, we Definitely know who Wrote it.
-1
JHRFDIY2 days ago
+2
Well we know it wasn't by Donald Trump anyway. It was far too legible for that.
2
EFIW15602 days ago
+9
The article discusses the Pakistani PM tweet being potentially written by Israel or the US, its not talking about trumps tweets.
9
OkCollection75621 day ago
+1
And the communication was done via the new official channel - X
1
[deleted]2 days ago
[deleted]
0
schu4KSU2 days ago
+7
The Trump admin portrayed the ceasefire as a last minute diplomatic measure originating in Pakistan.
The evidence here is that the Trump admin faked the 3rd party intervention as an excuse to avoid the deadline they had established. This makes Trump and the US look very weak and harms their negotiating position going forward.
7
[deleted]2 days ago
+1
[deleted]
1
Anxious_Weird99722 days ago
+3
It probably doesn't make much difference.
But it does indicate the sequence of events may not be as they appear.
3
RhubarbAfter40082 days ago
+1
Yes, it was written by ChatGPT like 99% of communication.
33 Comments