We all know this is literally just two sleep-deprived PR interns negotiating international diplomacy on the timeline.
86
samples98Apr 8, 2026
+21
It literally probably is this. “Hey one of you pretend to be the Pakistani President”
21
rbourbonApr 8, 2026
+59
But I thought we couldn't trust even a signature from Biden because it was autopen?
59
Mobile-Base7387Apr 9, 2026
+1
imagine using a tool to assist with a symbolic gesture, he should have been signing in blood with the bare nub of his finger worn raw or it's meaningless
1
lonefurApr 8, 2026
+29
The comments are puzzling. The article does not talk about orange’s posts. Article talks about a different person.
29
Slight-Egg-3790Apr 8, 2026
+33
It’s Listnook Bro most people don’t read
33
Obvious_Toe_3006Apr 8, 2026
+5
..and most people are not people !
5
teachersecretApr 9, 2026
+6
I’d say the implication here is that Pakistan is acting as a mouthpiece for the tangelo.
6
WittyCry4374Apr 8, 2026
+19
This ceasefire is arguably one of the most confusing and poorly coordinated diplomatic agreements in history.
19
IamhummusApr 8, 2026
+11
I have a feeling they sent a different version to each party and hoped it will work itself out
11
NextasyApr 9, 2026
+3
It's incredible, I don't even think there was an actual body of text that was even agreed upon. And out of everybody involved, only the US and f****** Hezbollah seemed remotely interested in following it for even 2 seconds lmao
3
Royal-Hunter3892Apr 8, 2026
+35
Pakistan was always a proxy of US but from the time Trump's second term began , he is using them overtly like a "Butler" .
35
ChickenMcFukket1Apr 8, 2026
+19
The same Pakistan that was hiding Osama right next to a major base?
19
paone00022Apr 8, 2026
+16
Not just any base it was the Pakistan military academy. Also the fact that CIA chose to not inform Pakistan once they found out Bin Laden was there and ran the whole capture operation without their knowledge.
Between their connections with Taliban and Al Qaeda, ISI can actually be called a rogue terrorist organization if we're being honest.
16
intricate_strandsApr 8, 2026
+5
How close is Trump to anyone that negatively impacted?
Can't even say "Republicans," because Trump gutted the party of anyone pre-Trump. And it's not like Trump would be offended by them doing so before he took control of the Republican party. Literally no one from the Republican party pre-Trump is in a political position aside from some judges.
As far as OBL is concerned, everyone at the American table of this is completely new.
5
navyblusheetApr 8, 2026
+5
I mean this was obvious. Someone from Trump's side wrote it to give Trump an off ramp.
5
Zardoz_Wearing_PantsApr 9, 2026
+3
wow, that's crazy, because I'm *certain* every single one of tRumps posts are from his slippery, greasy, tiny, blood soaked hands..
3
Sandman4344Apr 9, 2026
+3
Almost seems as if there was a tweet coined by U.S. personnel given to Pakistani PM to act as the fake mediator to give Trump the off-ramp. The issue and where I am in agreement here is there was no official specifically agreed upon plans from anyone other than the 15 point plan and 10 point plans discussed during the days before the whole death to civilazation shit. This is why Trump is saying the plan the U.S. was working with and agreed to is different than what Iran said they agreed to. More of a capitulation from Trump to kick the can down the road in another episode of "concept of" something whether healthcare, peace plan between Israel and Palestine and now this. Also those Polymarket accounts created right before the announcement of the ceasefire "agreement" that netted some individuals hundreds of thousands of dollars look mighty suspicious.
3
wwarnoutApr 8, 2026
+12
How could he tell? Proper grammar, no misspelled words, minimal references to himself, complete sentences...no way Trump wrote it.
12
EFIW1560Apr 8, 2026
+13
The tweet in question is the Pakistani PM tweet, not a tweet from trump.
13
PhDinDildos_FedorasApr 8, 2026
+6
In a negotiation, you'd want to draft your statements before hand and have everyone read and approve them.
6
Goose1963Apr 8, 2026
+4
Michael Cohen said that he would have other people do all the groveling/negotiating and at the very end, when he thought they had extracted enough money, he loved to strut in a make a big show of signing the "Deal". Also, if there was anything from him that needed to be provided in the future, in his mind it wasn't even part of the deal, and he would do anything possible to NOT hold up his end of it.
4
TACO_Orange_3098Apr 8, 2026
+4
if the words are spelled correctly and longer that 4 letters it wasn't trump
4
EFIW1560Apr 8, 2026
+8
You're right it wasnt trump because the article is talking about the pakistan PM tweet not a trump tweet.
8
Hefty-Comparison-801Apr 8, 2026
-1
Were random words Capitalized, because If so, we Definitely know who Wrote it.
-1
JHRFDIYApr 8, 2026
+2
Well we know it wasn't by Donald Trump anyway. It was far too legible for that.
2
EFIW1560Apr 8, 2026
+9
The article discusses the Pakistani PM tweet being potentially written by Israel or the US, its not talking about trumps tweets.
9
OkCollection7562Apr 10, 2026
+1
And the communication was done via the new official channel - X
1
[deleted]Apr 8, 2026
[deleted]
0
schu4KSUApr 8, 2026
+7
The Trump admin portrayed the ceasefire as a last minute diplomatic measure originating in Pakistan.
The evidence here is that the Trump admin faked the 3rd party intervention as an excuse to avoid the deadline they had established. This makes Trump and the US look very weak and harms their negotiating position going forward.
7
[deleted]Apr 8, 2026
+1
[deleted]
1
Anxious_Weird9972Apr 8, 2026
+3
It probably doesn't make much difference.
But it does indicate the sequence of events may not be as they appear.
3
RhubarbAfter4008Apr 9, 2026
+1
Yes, it was written by ChatGPT like 99% of communication.
33 Comments