· 158 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 16, 2026 at 4:19 PM

Pentagon approaches automakers, manufacturers to boost weapons production, WSJ reports

Posted by Constant-Wheel-7117



🚩 Report this post

158 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
MrDerpGently Apr 16, 2026 +1269
Hey, since nobody's going to be buying your cars for.. reasons, you think you could put all that idle production capacity to work on bullets for our endless wars with uh.. anyone? Everyone? Whatever, more bullets.
1269
IndependentSpecial17 Apr 16, 2026 +462
Bullet farm is going after gas town.
462
MrDerpGently Apr 16, 2026 +69
It's going to be a wild party, what could go wrong?
69
IndependentSpecial17 Apr 16, 2026 +46
The witness me drones, I learned in Farsi ‘shaheed’ means witness. Will we be making more 4 million dollar missiles to miss the 20k drones in this new arrangement?
46
MrDerpGently Apr 16, 2026 +12
I assume. And that's if they want to shoot at warships. If they are trying to protect wallowing tankers loaded with a couple hundred thousand tons of combustible hydrocarbons, uh, good luck. 
12
Saurian42 Apr 16, 2026 +17
I wish we had the ability to hold a vote of no confidence as the people.
17
WoolooOfWallStreet Apr 17, 2026 +3
Saheed’s Feed and Seed (Formerly Chuck’s)
3
6ft3Gujju Apr 16, 2026 +5
Shaheed means martyr.
5
laufsteakmodel Apr 17, 2026 +2
He was making a joke about "Mad Max: Fury Road".
2
Maniactver Apr 17, 2026 +2
I think we'll have a return of AA Flak turrets WWII style for anti-drone warfare.
2
nebrivor1 Apr 18, 2026 +2
BYOB
2
SuckMyBandAids Apr 16, 2026 +10
The only thing that can save us now is the guys from Cumtown 😭😭
10
Donny_Do_Nothing Apr 16, 2026 +7
I'm gay actor Michael Douglas and I agree.
7
jeterix7387 Apr 16, 2026 +9
Who runs Bartertown!
9
IndependentSpecial17 Apr 16, 2026 +6
Would China be the best candidate? I’m only certain of two archetypes in this scenario.
6
GingerBeast81 Apr 17, 2026 +2
Get out the assless chaps and shave your hair into a mohawk, it's go time!
2
dave_campbell Apr 16, 2026 +90
Whatever makes sense.
90
rbetterkids Apr 16, 2026 +20
Imagine all those fools signing up for the military. They're not serving their country. They're serving black rock, raytheon, planitir, lockhead, etc.
20
ArchmageXin Apr 16, 2026 +13
Lack of economic opportunities will do that for you.
13
Lucius-Halthier Apr 16, 2026 +24
It’s f****** ork mentality at this point, there is never such a thing as too much daka
24
MrDerpGently Apr 16, 2026 +12
I'm vaguely shocked we haven't started painting the ships and planes red.
12
Rounin Apr 16, 2026 +5
Makes em go faster!
5
defaultusername-17 Apr 17, 2026 +2
dats cuz we paints em blu cuz itz luki!
2
Mo_Jack Apr 17, 2026 +8
Why do we need weapons for a war that we have already won?
8
artbystorms Apr 16, 2026 +16
I'm getting serious 1928 Germany vibes. Gotta build up the war machine before you attempt world domination.
16
Oceanbreeze871 Apr 17, 2026 +4
Cadillac made tanks in ww2
4
MrDerpGently Apr 17, 2026 +8
So did VW. 
8
sasha_the_impaler Apr 17, 2026 +2
Yeah because they were nationalized during a wartime economy
2
Rattus_NorvegicUwUs Apr 16, 2026 +855
We fired billions in rockets and missiles for what? Higher gas prices and a humiliating loss to Iran?! Now they want your cars to cost more so they can do it again? We spent the equivalent of **the entire NIH budget** in SIX DAYS of war. If the estimated economic fallout (~$1T)occurs, we will have wasted TWENTY YEARS of NIH funding for nothing. A fifth of a century of scientific and medical progress, literally set on fire. All for what? Israel? Ego? Lunacy? Whatever it was, it wasn’t for any of us. The GOP are unqualified and unworthy of office. They all need to go. They are destroying our economy, our reputation, our pride. Vote them all out, every last one. From senate to school board, we need a purge.
855
LA_Ramz Apr 16, 2026 +198
Theyre a cult who are now even going against the pope.
198
royalenocheese Apr 16, 2026 +93
I'd take it a step further. Make examples of them. Their actions are treasonous when you look at the benefactors of pretty much everything they've done to this point. Maybe I'm wrong and someone can point out the good they've done for the country, but I can't see it.
93
windraver Apr 17, 2026 +2
Like how Nazis were banned from Germany, they should also be banned, along with MAGA, from the US. This would probably have issues under the first amendment, so it'd have to be done by designating them as terrorist entities.
2
True_Window_9389 Apr 16, 2026 +29
Between Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran, Republicans will end up leaving us in Middle Eastern wars for half a century, $5 trillion or whatever wasted dollars, and a bunch of dead innocents and servicemen
29
VioletGardens-left Apr 16, 2026 +46
It really goes to show how absurdly overpriced every single military hardware the US has. Iran literally toss drones and missiles for literally fraction the cost and they destroy targets regardless
46
Budget-Tadpole7520 Apr 16, 2026 +22
Yeah, but we have C-Suites, that have made good money.
22
RemoteButtonEater Apr 17, 2026 +8
For what they're asking for for Iran, you could build ten manned moon bases.
8
Rattus_NorvegicUwUs Apr 17, 2026 +7
Can’t remember who said it: “Rekindle pride? For $200B we could have written ‘f*** off, China’ onto the *moon*”
7
Ralphwiggum911 Apr 16, 2026 +14
Trump thinks things that go boom make him and by extension the us look powerful. He's a f****** idiot who surrounded himself with even more stupid people than him somehow. Also, a bunch of opportunists.
14
future_sommelier Apr 16, 2026 +6
I think it’s even stupider than that. I think someone once told him that WWII ended the Great Depression and that “war is always good for the economy.”
6
Johnny55 Apr 16, 2026 +15
Gas prices are a little high but the stock market is up so I don't see any real economic consequences. Yes I'm being facetious but like...it really doesn't feel like we're living in reality which makes it that much harder to get through to people.
15
CaptPants Apr 16, 2026 +20
I honestly think that the stock market can't go down more than a few percent and immediately bounce back. 10% of the population (the wealthiest) own 93% of all stocks, and the only reason their stocks are worth that much is because so much money is IN stocks. I don't know what kind of world event would have to happen for that 10% to decide to cash out all their stocks to make it "liquid" and actually crash the market. (It's not like they need the cash, they're already the richest on the planet)
20
bartolo345 Apr 16, 2026 +5
Yeah but it keeps these researchers employed. Win?  https://costsofwar.watson.brown.edu/
5
13lueChicken Apr 16, 2026 +5
I’d say we need to clear both benches. Fire the coaches. Prosecute the owners. I feel like, in light of the inefficacy of our current checks and balances, older methods are in order.
5
Bunch_of_Shit Apr 17, 2026 +2
maga doesn’t care how much he spends because they’ll just say trump is saving the world preventing them from building a nuclear weapon
2
MarqFJA87 Apr 17, 2026 +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
aeternusvoxpopuli Apr 17, 2026 +1
While you're at it, and you're right, let's throw in 90% of the DNC into the purge. *BOTH* parties are corrupt and irredeemable. There's a handful of decent Democrats and maybe a few dozen opportunists who care about the direction that the wind is blowing. But by and large, the party is fucked. Anyone supporting Israel needs to be removed from office.
1
SaltyShawarma Apr 16, 2026 +211
Why would we need to boost ammo supplies when we are not at war?
211
IKillZombies4Cash Apr 16, 2026 +62
We are starting one apparently…semantics
62
CTQ99 Apr 16, 2026 +16
Cant end wars without starting them
16
alemorg Apr 16, 2026 +14
This is the calm before the storm
14
cyb3rg0d5 Apr 16, 2026 +6
Because the not-war is exhausting the supplies.
6
ZenPothos Apr 16, 2026 +11
"We have always been at war with Eastasia" /s
11
RsquSqd Apr 17, 2026 +2
They’re ‘peace’ bullets
2
MrScandanavia Apr 17, 2026 +1
We’re preparing for a bigger one… with China
1
Vortep1 Apr 16, 2026 +44
It's time for our once in every 3-10 year taxpayer funded bailout of the auto industry. This time it's brought to you by DoD spending.
44
ArdaBerkBurak Apr 16, 2026 +104
Why is Americans' money being wasted on meaningless wars in the Middle East?
104
Far_Adeptness9884 Apr 16, 2026 +54
Corruption, greed, ineptitude.
54
InvisiblePinkUnic0rn Apr 16, 2026 +16
because were starting meaningless wars in the Caribbean soon
16
Chainsawferret Apr 16, 2026 +13
Distraction! What files?
13
Easy_Bite6858 Apr 16, 2026 +146
Everyone is going poor while the rich buy all the assets. As long as people are c**** and assets are expensive, the rich will use the poor to acquire assets. This is the basis of war. If you want to stop the war, tax the rich.
146
Chaos-Cortex Apr 16, 2026 +47
Imprison the rich , minimum!
47
chaos8803 Apr 16, 2026 +11
How about we stock up on fava beans and nice chianti?
11
Iohet Apr 17, 2026 +5
I hope they enjoy their throne of ashes
5
onceinawhile222 Apr 16, 2026 +28
Is the next step to issue ration cards to control gas and food prices?
28
firefighter26s Apr 16, 2026 +9
I wouldn't give them any ideas. They had different ration books for different people; so if you were a productive member of society working in a war related industry you got more than others, etc. You don't think they'd force all the people they don't like into the lowest tier of ration out of spite?!?!?!
9
komeau Apr 16, 2026 +7
suddenly a lot of jokes in those old Looney Tunes will make sense again. A cards and meatless Tuesdays and “Is this trip really necessary?” etc.
7
danb1kenobi Apr 16, 2026 +2
Pretty much https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chevron-andy-walz-gas-prices-iran-war/
2
Money_Statement_9861 Apr 17, 2026 +2
They've already tried to sell us on "Temporary pain"
2
outerproduct Apr 16, 2026 +22
Can't afford healthcare, can only afford more war.
22
NoMidnight5366 Apr 16, 2026 +20
So the kill the EV subsidies for the auto industry just so China can take over global EV production and instead use that money to buy bomb craters in Iran.
20
LeadInvestPB Apr 16, 2026 +14
So the government is going to use taxpayer dollars to buy military vehicles from American auto makers. These automakers will likely have to import the parts/raw materials from countries with tariffs. These tariffs get paid into some account that Trump's people control. Doesn't this seem like money laundering?
14
JOWhite63087 Apr 16, 2026 +11
Since day one of his second term.
11
Verum_Orbis Apr 16, 2026 +14
It was either Robert Reich or Richard Wolff who warned months ago that this fascist regime was transitioning to a war economy, sacrificing the well being of future generations of Americans.
14
OrneryZombie1983 Apr 16, 2026 +12
This isn't WWII where you can throw together thousands of tanks or P-51s every week.
12
jerknmygherkn Apr 17, 2026 +5
Given today’s manufacturing technology, we probably could produce thousands of P51s and tanks every week. Unfortunately, Sherman’s and P51s are at a disadvantage in this day and age.
5
BreadForTofuCheese Apr 16, 2026 +11
Ironically, I work at an aerospace company making lots of these products and we really haven’t seen demand increase. We even make major components for some stuff you see in the news frequently.
11
Ornery_Flounder3142 Apr 16, 2026 +9
We will help bust the unions for you guys in return.
9
russwilbur Apr 16, 2026 +39
American auto makers can’t even make compelling vehicles compared to the Chinese and Koreans anymore and now we’re desperate for them to build weapons?
39
smurfsundermybed Apr 16, 2026 +26
The new 7.62s will have touchscreens
26
TwoPoundzaSausage Apr 16, 2026 +23
"Case ejection not available with your subscription plan. Please pay $15.99/month to unlock extractor."
23
smurfsundermybed Apr 17, 2026 +2
To load, touch start on the round, enter login, follow MFA protocols, accept TOS, then load round once the screen turns green. Repeat for each round. Any unauthenticated round will void the remainder of the clip.
2
Responsible-Food3681 Apr 16, 2026 +36
I really, really, really hope that companies have the gall to stand up to the Trump administration on this one. This is very consequential. We're essentially trying to central plan our way into transforming consumer goods manufacturing capacity into munitions and other military-bound parts and supplies. Not only is this an unheard of amount of influence directly in private companies outside of the world wars, but it's creating an economic incentive structure to *keep manufacturing these things at the expense of consumer goods supplies, even after the Iran War.* The intermingling of private and public interests like this is one of the foundational aspects of how a fascist economy works. The more companies work with the government not through regulations but through direct actions, the more they're expected to bend the knee in the future and accede to the whims of power instead of the whims of the market. When wartime economies start, they don't tend to stop unless there's a reason. With Trump and his ilk already stating Cuba is "next" and attempting old-school imperialism across the globe, what incentive would companies who have just paid millions in capital expenditures to be able to make weapons for the government have when conflict stops? Do they have an incentive to spend millions more (likely without any financial assistance from the federal government this time) to retrofit their machinery back to consumer goods manufacturing once again? Or, perhaps, does the consistent and lucrative new manufacturing pipeline try its best to persist through outward corruption and lobbying, ensuring peace is temporary and their profits persist? I don't see how this is anything but an accelerationist move. And for what, exactly...? Thousands of lives lost in the Middle East? Skyrocketing energy and fertilizer prices, the downstream effects of which we're only *beginning* to feel? Tension with another global power (China) since we're effectively embargoing a large portion of their energy imports, putting us in a situation where one flare-up can potentially start WWIII? An embarrassing amount of hubris that sends our brothers and sisters to die because of the neurotic decisions of a dementia-addled octogenarian? Invoking the 25th now is the best move our politicians could do to protect our future. Call your representatives and demand justice and rationality.
36
vesperfall Apr 16, 2026 +5
Invoking the 25th will never happen sadly ... he put way too many "yes Mr President, whatever you do is perfection and I thank you for even allowing me to sit in the same room as you" type of people in his cabinet to get even get it started nevermind the 2/3 majority in both chambers it will take to finalize. The way I see it, as long as he is still breathing, we have no chance of doing anything. Pending we actually have a free and fair election in November, then perhaps *something* can at least start to happen with congress actually limiting his powers (or at least trying to until he inevitability blows through any checks/balances they do submit), hence why I unfortunately think we just have to wait for him to be *fully* gone. November can't come soon enough as this will be really be a test of our country and if we can't do it then, well, it was a good run!
5
elmekia_lance Apr 17, 2026 +2
they're preparing for WWIII
2
sharingan10 Apr 16, 2026 +14
This won’t work for a variety of reasons. Sure you could get humvees, but there isn’t a shortage of humvees in the U.S. military . Other military equipment is much more specialized. A ford or a gmc can’t just retool a multi continent supply chain to manufacture a tank without it costing an enormous sum of money and taking a long time. Further still the rare earth shortage hit companies like gmc and ford really bad when China did it last time; that would imperil their entire business if they integrated defense contacts into it even more. The shortage of equipment is going to be coming from things like rockets, precision guided munitions, air defense systems, etc… but those things take an enormous amount of expertise to design and have supply chains that are convoluted. The engineers who work on those have high security clearance standards, and the companies making them have been in the business for decades. This isn’t something that can be willed into existence overnight and the business models are radically different. The U.S. isn’t used to waging war designed around country to country wars, and current business models for gmc/ ford are largely based around peacetime profit optimization (low buffer stock, lean manufacturing; order as needed from global suppliers who can ship things over as needed), it’s not built to do that type of business.
14
hera-fawcett Apr 16, 2026 +25
p sure this is what they did during ww2 🤡
25
KwisatzHaderach94 Apr 16, 2026 +13
well that was a "legal" war. trump is putting america and its industries on a war footing for no good reason. and still claiming to be a peacemaker.
13
HYDROMORPHONE_ZONE Apr 16, 2026 +8
While threatening genocide
8
Carrera_996 Apr 16, 2026 +13
Oh ya. Ford made Jeeps. It wasn't a request.
13
TwoPoundzaSausage Apr 16, 2026 +8
General Motors made planes. Chrysler, too. Mitsubishi made planes for the Japanese.
8
TheGreatPornholio123 Apr 17, 2026 +2
Which makes f****** actual sense considering they were mostly made of stamped materials like aluminum for serial production unlike today’s thing consisting of shit tons of electronics and composites.
2
HYDROMORPHONE_ZONE Apr 16, 2026 +3
Vietnam as well. General Motors and probably others as well made ordnance like mortars. People on the battlefield were wondering why a car company made something like that when they found pieces with General Motors stamped into them
3
theClumsy1 Apr 16, 2026 +1
They also used to make tractors and other industrial applications.
1
Direlion Apr 16, 2026 +6
Called it right when Trump got elected. They’d blow the economy to pieces, then use existing industry to make war machines to use on former friends and allies to steal from them. This is what the Nazis did too when they were driving their nation straight to hell.
6
ComposedStudent Apr 16, 2026 +5
Preparing for a longer war?
5
GolfIll564 Apr 16, 2026 +5
Nothing says a war is almost over like turning your manufacturing capacity to a war footing
5
turb0_encapsulator Apr 17, 2026 +4
everything they do is like textbook Third Reich shit, and yet we're told we're overreacting. Their stupid energy policies are going to destroy the domestic auto industry, so now they are going to use taxpayer money to buy them off and turn them into weapons companies.
4
SoftlySpokenPromises Apr 17, 2026 +4
Ah, a wartime economy without the boom of a wartime economy. Moving straight to the economic depression.
4
burnmenowz Apr 16, 2026 +4
War machine keeps stealing our tax dollars.
4
darthy_parker Apr 16, 2026 +4
For a “no new wars” presidential promise, this sure sounds like going all-in for the military-industrial complex. But of course, all those social programs will have to go to pay for it.
4
JackHughman69 Apr 16, 2026 +3
Cause the war is so close to being finished!
3
Kaliente13 Apr 16, 2026 +8
Knowing how reliable American cars are in recent years, I wouldn’t bet my money on those weapons.
8
F0rkbombz Apr 16, 2026 +7
In all honesty our Defense Industrial Base (DIB) is not performing as well as it should be in order to allow us to fight a major protracted conflict. It will take years to replace the munitions we spent in a month of war with Iran. I’m not saying this is the right move, and I’m sure the poor decisions that this admin has made are compounding the issue, but I think we need to explore all options at this point.
7
jimtow28 Apr 16, 2026 +3
Lol this is like the first time around when he decided to announce that Kodak would be making medical equipment now. Anyone tried out the new Kodak MRI machines yet? Yeah, me either.
3
DootyMcCool2000 Apr 16, 2026 +3
You'd think we're fighting the Nazis again with how hard these fuckers are pushing for help with their stupid war
3
Ok-disaster2022 Apr 16, 2026 +3
So the government wouldn't open up production during covid for vital medical supplies while hundreds of thousands of Americans were being killed  but hey they'll open up production to commit genocide. Just a bunch of f****** fascists. 
3
13lueChicken Apr 16, 2026 +3
I know we’re tired. They’ve been wearing us down. We need to do something about the Epstein files. If they’re taken down, their power stripped, generally *any* way we can remove them from society, this too will end. The branches of government have failed. The courts have failed. The enforcement has failed. We’re quiet because the only option left is not civilized. The deal we made with them has been broken, but they removed our teeth. State militias have been replaced with a federal entity. We no longer have anything protecting us. Besides ourselves.
3
Ok_Surprise_4090 Apr 16, 2026 +3
I'll never buy a car from a manufacturer who helps illegally bomb Iran, and I'll sell my Mazda immediately if they somehow get on board.
3
cordova527 Apr 16, 2026 +3
I never thought the day would come where I admit I'm embarrassed to be an Amerikkkan. Land of the almost free, home of the once brave...
3
Budget-Tadpole7520 Apr 16, 2026 +3
Nobody has money for cars, but the gov has the money printer for the military. Go where the money is.
3
albanymetz Apr 17, 2026 +3
How about asking Smith& Wesson to make affordable houses?
3
Voodoocookie Apr 17, 2026 +3
Elon is going to suck more taxpayer monies
3
PapaBorq Apr 17, 2026 +3
Between this, and triggering a mandatory auto-draft between ages 18 to 26... What in the f*** are they planning?
3
defaultusername-17 Apr 17, 2026 +3
nothing alarming here... totally not pressuring industry to gear up for wartime production as the forever war they have gotten us into threatens to spiral into a larger conflict or anything...
3
CreativeKeane Apr 17, 2026 +3
Please no. We don't need more weapons for needless war that harm innocent lives snd makes our allies hate us. Also, wouldn't't this take years to shift gears? Lol. Like rebuild certain assembly machinery from the grounds up or replace them. By the time the swap equipment, the stupid wars that trump is pursuing will likely be abandoned, end, and etc.
3
freexanarchy Apr 17, 2026 +3
maybe start with solving the food rationing issue that's going on with troops currently fighting the epstein war?
3
pattydickens Apr 16, 2026 +4
I really think that we should adopt legislation that makes a popular vote mandatory for any proactive wars. Neither Venezuela nor Iran were emergency situations that required immediate action. The people of this country should be the ones who decide if an invasion or bombing campaign or regime change is worth it, not some 80 year old dude who literally doesn't care about what happens in 20 years. At the very least, it should require congressional approval, but a popular vote would make far more sense.
4
Herkfixer Apr 17, 2026 +5
It already is a requirement to have a vote in Congress (which means it would never have been approved). The issue isnt that there are no rules against it, its that the GOP in Congress refuse to use that authority at all and has ceded all authority they have to Trump.
5
HoamerEss Apr 16, 2026 +2
Eh, I'm certain there are absolutely no parallels to 1930's Germany here We are cooked
2
EggNo289 Apr 16, 2026 +2
So... World War Three?
2
cancielo Apr 17, 2026 +2
They changed their name to Department of War. I guess they have to act like it.
2
Nom_de_guerre_25 Apr 17, 2026 +2
I'm sure we'll hear no complaints about "government meddling in private industry".
2
hl_lost Apr 17, 2026 +2
lol the irony of going to automakers who are about to get crushed by tariffs. "hey we know we just made your supply chain a nightmare but could you also make missiles pls" tbh this is pretty standard diversification playbook though. happened in ww2, happened during korea. the manufacturing base is there, retooling is faster than building from scratch. whether we *should* need to is a different question entirely
2
Soft-Skirt Apr 17, 2026 +2
Switching the US to a war time economy would be a great excuse for cancelling the midterms.
2
eternityXclock Apr 17, 2026 +4
taking into account that they werent cancelled during ww2 or civil war, why would this make it a great excuse?
4
stu54 Apr 17, 2026 +5
Well, the guy in the whitehouse has his way with following precedents.
5
eternityXclock Apr 17, 2026 +2
The point that I wanted to convey is that I don't consider it a great excuse. I have no doubt that he will try every option that he can find, no matter how stupid or pointless it might seem.
2
NewTimeTraveler1 Apr 17, 2026 +2
So we boycott whoever agrees to to do this
2
kaken777 Apr 17, 2026 +2
Ah the good ol’ shift to a war time economy. How long before they starts loaning detainees to factories to increase productivity?
2
ARoodyPooCandyAss Apr 17, 2026 +2
The national debt has got to be insane and senseless at that…
2
Murdoch98 Apr 16, 2026 +5
Imagine working 10-30 years for one of these companies. Taking pride in the cars and trucks you have helped produce all those years and now are told by the company, we are switching gears and will be making missiles to kill large groups of people. An all girls school perhaps. I don’t think I could keep working for one of these companies.
5
Qanaesin Apr 16, 2026 +1
So WW2?
1
BrofessorFarnsworth Apr 16, 2026 +4
How about f*** off and release the Epstein files? That's a cheaper and safer alternative 
4
Captain_Aware4503 Apr 16, 2026 +3
You know what will fix high gas prices, a shortage of new cars!!! - Brilliant!!!
3
Tex1931 Apr 16, 2026 +1
Well someone’s stock just went up. Maybe a big 3 combination of stocks? Ya think ?
1
chciKaspp Apr 16, 2026 +1
This is why the US prop up American Automakers and don’t allow Chinese EVs
1
qlurp Apr 16, 2026 +1
That’s a good sign, right?
1
Feisty-Barracuda5452 Apr 16, 2026 +1
Israel needs more bombs...snap to it!
1
Mrjlawrence Apr 16, 2026 +1
You wanna sell even fewer cars now and whenever this war ends? — Pentagon to Automakers
1
SleepingToDreaming Apr 16, 2026 +1
"Used cars are the bread and butter of the automotive economy and only morons are buying new cars so, start making things that hurt and maim, ok?  Kthnxbye!"
1
Senior-Procedure-748 Apr 16, 2026 +1
This is where they realize that the American industrial sector has been obliterated already
1
MomsAreola Apr 16, 2026 +1
Should start asking shoe companies.
1
Tacitblue1973 Apr 16, 2026 +1
I remember the tracked APC we had on the farm growing up was of Ford manufacture. WW2 surplus. We used it for clearing old orchards for pasture. Good ol' Bren Gun Carrier.
1
MentalDisintegrat1on Apr 16, 2026 +1
My dream of driving a rocket might happen
1
Hayes77519 Apr 16, 2026 +1
When it’s going great 
1
youngdoug Apr 16, 2026 +1
I would absolutely love a surplus Ford AR15
1
morbidmammoth Apr 16, 2026 +1
Oh that’s always a great sign
1
CaptainHawaii Apr 16, 2026 +1
They really wanna wartime economy this b****... THESE MOTHER FUCKERS WANT TO PLAY HOI4 IRL.
1
GuitarGeezer Apr 16, 2026 +1
Well, naturally, if you have infinite munitions as Hegseth and Trump like to pretend the only problem you have is uh demanding more ……boosted production?!!! But, why that might mean…. Making those silly statements as if they are children and then seeing these real world proofs of the outright lies is part of why all in this trainwreck other than possibly Rubio but definitely including Trump should become fired pariahs. No Ayatollahs could put words into Hegseth and Trump’s mouths worse for US prestige and alliances and world trade than the words they themselves say.
1
thecurlyburl Apr 16, 2026 +1
This is like all the worst parts of the “‘member berries” South Park idea…
1
ProbablyBanksy Apr 16, 2026 +1
War is good for the economy. The world needs to change this equation so there's less incentive.
1
AZFUNGUY85 Apr 17, 2026 +1
We’ve gone from ventilators to mutilators in auto plants. UHHHHMMEERRRRIIIIIICCUCHHHHH
1
Mike-SBA Apr 17, 2026 +1
How much more will these businesses charge ? Will Republicans void the tax cuts given to the wealthy (about $7 trillion) and use these tax cuts to cover military spending or will Republicans cut further federal funding for the few benefits that Americans still receive?
1
pentultimate Apr 17, 2026 +1
Never mind competing with BYD for affordable EV's
1
RedPandaExplorer Apr 17, 2026 +1
This is like when I convert my factories in Hearts of Iron 4 Someone please just get Trump a copy
1
Jimmaplesong Apr 18, 2026 +1
And that’s how Elon Musk joined the defense industry.
1
GamingWithBilly Apr 19, 2026 +1
Todays 37 dead in school missile attack brought to you by Ford, when you need a missile delivery system, nothing beats a Ford.  And when you need a bunker buster, Ford Tough gets it done!
1
TheWolfbytez Apr 19, 2026 +1
I f****** hate the military industrial complex. Everything should be brought in house. Cut out the middle men. Cut Boeing, NG and LM out of the picture. We would save so much money. Also, public pressure and influence could reign that shit in.
1
← Back to Board