· 199 comments · Save ·
Announcements Mar 26, 2026 at 12:21 PM

Platner holds commanding lead over Mills in Maine Senate race: Poll

Posted by jediporcupine


https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5801426-platner-holds-commanding-lead-over-mills-in-maine-senate-race-poll/

🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
MetalMoneky Mar 26, 2026 +3342
Not sure when dem leadership will learn their voters are done with the old Status quo. Them being so obvious in thier disdain is only going to make thier downfall hit harder.
3342
JalapenoJamm Mar 26, 2026 +1770
That’s why the DNC never released their post election autopsy because it would just confirm what everybody has already known
1770
cowboyjosh2010 Mar 26, 2026 +647
Call me Janus, but I both believe the DNC is wildly out of touch with what a broad winning message would be right now, and also simultaneously think if you have failed to vote for the Democratic Party's nominee in basically any race up and down the ballot across any of the past 10 Novembers, you're at least partially complicit in things being so bad in this country right now. I know that a common defense is something like "don't expect me to vote for somebody I hate just to avoid getting somebody else I also hate." or perhaps instead "the DNC hasn't changed their ways by electing their nominees before, so I guess we'll have to do something different and not elect their nominees now." Okay. Fine. I hear you. I hope your gamble pays off and we get through this storm to a much better place. But along the way I'm looking at my young children and genuinely praying that the tide turns and we get to a safe harbor where we can set up the future before it's too late for them to avoid the worst of Project 2025's goals. When my kids' futures are in the kitty, I don't appreciate betting that my royal straight flush will come together with the river card. Y'all better be right.
647
Signal_Minimum8509 Mar 26, 2026 +177
Well said. It’s a well worn strategy of every Republican candidate’s electoral machine for the past ten years to encourage voters to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Democratic candidates may have complied with the program and the DCCC has definitely lost the plot in certain areas of the country, but I would say without question we’re further away from where we all want to be than we were in 2016.
177
kingcalogrenant Mar 26, 2026 +91
This is why I have a strong preference for your phrasing “perfect be the enemy of the good” as opposed to “the lesser evil” framing that theoretically expresses the same idea. I don’t accept that the Democrats being in power makes things worse. Moving in the correct direction consistently and avoiding the historical setbacks caused by GOP administrations would amount to a huge amount of progress.
91
mega-d-lux Mar 26, 2026 +4
>Moving in the correct direction consistently and avoiding the historical setbacks caused by GOP administrations This needs to be the DNCs agenda right here.
4
Miserable-Cap-5223 Mar 26, 2026 +62
Exactly. Republicans have been winning elections because their voters believe "anyone is better than a Democrat." Even the ones that hated Trump voted for him because they thought the world would end if a Democrat won. Is that cult behavior? Yes, absolutely. Does it get results? Yes, absolutely. 
62
Stabby-Steve Mar 26, 2026 +5
Probably not an original, or even good, analogy. But I've been picturing it as the Republicans are like a dog sled team. Each dog might have their own special interest, but they all pull the sled (their party) in unison to get to the goal. The Democrats sled is pulled by cats.
5
Redtitwhore Mar 26, 2026 +81
Yup, the "burn it all down" folks don't realize how much worse things can get. I miss the country before MAGA so much - even if some of it was just smoke and mirrors.
81
guamisc Mar 26, 2026 +39
While I agree, the establishment has a duty to not let the burn it down coalition get as big as it's gotten. Being wholly out of touch and offering basically nothing for years and years is a significant problem. And when I say offering basically nothing, I mean no actual change. Things ***must*** fundamentally change.
39
brrnr Mar 26, 2026 +26
This is the crux of it. The underlying assumption with all this "don't let perfect be the enemy of good" rhetoric is that we were all more or less *fine* and we're just being picky. It denies the reality that people are absolutely not fine and they have not been fine for a long time - Occupy Wall Street was under Obama for Christ's sake. None of this would've happened if everyone was *just fine*. We are where we are because the Democratic Party has been completely out of touch and failing large swaths of people for a long, long time; that can't just be dismissed because the number of people living the "middle class" dream was like, marginally higher. No one living paycheck to paycheck now wants to *go back* to when they were paycheck to paycheck in 2010. It's a losing message. We must push forward into a better future for everyone.
26
joeychestnutsrectum Mar 26, 2026 +6
People hate on Dems but Biden was the second most progressive president in history and pushed through the largest climate change combat bill in the history of planet earth. People hate that they’re milquetoast, but actually don’t give a shit about being actually progressive at the polls
6
CyoteMondai Mar 26, 2026 +29
It's been particularly bad in this current landscape because I understand that of anyone that is even remotely engaged enough to have an opinion (an unfortunately small number which is another part of the problem) seeing the absolute collapse of the capital D democratic party is infuriating and discouraging. Especially anyone young enough to have felt the aftershocks of Clinton's neoliberalism and the at best bait and switch of Obama being more of the same with Bush in-between, it paints a fairly bleak outlook. And I can extend that understanding all the way to Trump's first election, I think a lot of people just couldn't really picture him actually winning and the grievances with the whole system leading to that result almost seems inevitable. But if that wasn't your wake up call that whatever fighting you want to do through primaries and voting for differences in your representation has a breaking point where there is only two choices on the table and you couldn't take "the lesser of two evils" again, you just either don't get what was at stake or never actually cared enough to begin with. There is always time to fight and push for changes, but once the choices are in place, you still have to be grown enough to understand you make a decision based on the next fight you want to have. Throwing in the towel just dooms everyone else to an even harder fight, with more people being hurt as collateral damage in its wake.
29
TeutonJon78 Mar 26, 2026 +12
Biden winning the 2020 primaries was all the fuel the DNC needed to feel they didn't need to evolve at all. Most of the candidates were neolibs (all but 3, and only 2 of those were even possible winners), and people ended up coalescing around the most old guard of them all (mostly due to Clyburn endorsing him in SC). And then you had Warren, one of the aforementioned 3, picking up Hillary's old campaign team and immediately tacking right in the primaries killing her chances. Only Williamson (who had no chance) and Sanders (who also had an uphill battle) kept true to their messages. And Williamson wasn't exactly pushing for meaningful systemic change either. Edit: wrong year
12
cowboyjosh2010 Mar 26, 2026 +8
A heads up: Biden won the 2020 primary, not the 2016.
8
Maleficent_West_991 Mar 26, 2026 +10
The problem is the Dems abandoned many of their more left leaning allies in the name of being more moderate or centrist. I’ve voted Dem in every election, lesser of two evils and all that, but as someone way more left than the Dem party I can’t be mad that people are over their shit. They have inherent disdain for anything grassroots in their own party and they’re so out of touch they constantly blame their own base for abysmal turnout when they actively ignore the bases wants in terms of candidates. I’ve been asking this question since 2016 or so, what are you supposed to do as a left leaning voter? If you’re in a two party system and one party basically relies on you but actively disparages anything you want from the deal in return how do you participate? If one group is committed to being the worse of two options and the second option just says “perfect now I don’t have to change anything despite the clear problems happening all around us” how does that not start to feel like “both sides”? I know there’s a huge difference and imo most politicians are more on the side of republicans than the people but that’s beside the point. Most people aren’t engaged politically at least at any level of depth and fewer of those people are extremely educated about the subjects. If you think the republicans are the bad guys and you constantly vote dem just to watch them be like Charlie Brown getting the football pulled away repeatedly for 10 years, or all the times they own goal themselves or disrespect their constitutes I can see how it gets real “controlled opposition” feeling and apathy sets in. I’m not advocating throwing in the towel but the Dems have mismanaged the entire political landscape and its surrounding apparatuses like the media for something like 15 years. I don’t have a lot of confidence they’re gonna pull us out of this regardless. Not because I think they’re incompetent, although I do. Not even just because they’re feckless in general. I don’t think they have a shot because they’re backed into a corner by corporate resources and due to that it’s rare you hear them say the truth. If you can’t even acknowledge that 2020 and project 2025 are essentially coup attempts to change the culture and power structures of the country and that everyone involved that can be connected to them money or otherwise needs to be jailed, then how can I expect you to fight against it? I don’t even think most Dems can even process that the people who are their “colleagues” and associates are trying to create a sort of a techno-feudalist religious surveillance state that would make Orwell spin in his grave, why would I expect them to do well in that situation? TLDR I vote for them and try to educate people but I don’t got a lot of faith in the leadership or even most of the party to correctly respond both to the current threat nor to the clamoring of their voters. I think we’re in for rough times.
10
SplinteredBrick Mar 26, 2026 +4
100% I think the party is deeply flawed but when I look at the alternative, it’s a no brainer.
4
FakeMcNotReal Mar 26, 2026 +7
I have an educated, liberal, transgender friend who refused to vote in 2024 because Harris was to the right of Cornell West and now his state is trying to legally eradicate him from all public life.  No Dem is likely to be as far to the left as I want them to be, and as a party Dems have milquetoast, conflict-averse leadership, but they're still not transparently evil robber-priests like the GOP and therefore get my vote.
7
Able-Bid-6637 Mar 26, 2026 +7
Totally completely agree; the dems are annoying, but we can work with that-- the launch pad is closer to the end goal. Meanwhile the repubs are literally removing peoples' rights or worse, encouraging the rest of the country to view anyone who isn't a white male as subhuman... the launch pad is in the gutter. I just wish the Dems would take a new approach of actually being the honest, transparent, and humane group they say they are. Like if they could basically say, "look-- our party has made mistakes. We've let some atrocious things happen in the past, and have even spearheaded some of those poor actions. But we want to change, and want you to help us correct our path along the way with your voices and votes, from the local level to the federal level-- and even beyond to our international impact. We certainly aren't perfect, but we can improve together by diminishing the wage gap, raising taxes for the ultra-rich, ensuring everyone, including our most poor and marginalized and vulnerable, have the basic needs and food and shelter every human deserves; ensuring our citizens have affordable (or free, ahem) access to healthcare, and by being the Freedom Fighter we claim to be by no longer supporting genocides and instead standing up against the oppressors. It won't happen overnight as we will have to dismantle deeply rooted foundational systems, but we can at least be transparent with our goals and progress, and truly represent your needs that you demand so you feel heard and at peace."  Basically-- just wish they would own up to their mistakes and hypocrisy, but pledge to move forward. Their strategy of judging the republicans' poor moral decisions doesn't do shit when they're dipping their toes in similar waters; it just makes us look even worse and shady.  But MAIN POINT is that the republicans are significantly worse, and not voting "due to principle" is essentially a vote for them that they are relying on. Just wish our dems would fiinaaaally switch gears because what they're doing isn't bringing in the votes.
7
kittenTakeover Mar 26, 2026 +85
Why would it release it?
85
mattcolor Mar 26, 2026 +337
Because it makes them look bad for trying to tell voters what they want rather than listening to them.
337
DoggedStooge Mar 26, 2026 +188
They sent me a survey, I replied telling them to hand over the reigns to more progressive-minded people. A month later, they sent me the same survey, I sent the same reply. A month later, another survey. That time I told them to f*** off and that my answers weren't changing. A month later, another survey, I didn't reply, and no surveys since. They will just keep asking the same questions until they get the answers they want rather than the answers they're given.
188
Bushels_for_All Mar 26, 2026 +58
It's probably because those are less surveys than fundraising mailers. If it succeeds in generating engagement, they'll keep sending them. The ACLU does the same thing. "Tell us what you think about this *really important issue*! Oh, and you can check this box to donate $20..." Gotta compete with Elmo and Ellison somehow.
58
WookieJedi123 Mar 26, 2026 +26
This is the correct answer. Those are donation letters pretending to be surveys.
26
Bittererr Mar 26, 2026 +78
Meanwhile to them it looks like you were passionate about them moving to the left and then over time became satisfied enough that you stopped asking for it.
78
tEnPoInTs Mar 26, 2026 +33
Right. "We did it! We wore DoggedStooge down! Mission Accomplished! Politics won."
33
geologicalnoise Mar 26, 2026 +12
That's really it. Silence is a battle lost without ever being fought.
12
fromks Mar 26, 2026 +109
Shoehorned candidates lose. That's why Hilary lost, that's why Kamala lost. Neither had truly competitive primaries. And internet commentators telling voters they are sexist or racist for not falling in line behind uninspiring candidates is just a cherry on top.
109
kittenTakeover Mar 26, 2026 +141
I mean the things Donald has been given a pass on definitely shine a light on how people treat men differently than women.
141
gasmith8787 Mar 26, 2026 +43
I’m not going to pretend that society doesn’t treat men and women differently. But the way Trump has been and is treated is in another universe all together.
43
Sptsjunkie Mar 26, 2026 +8
I'd also add that I 100% agree sexism exists and played a part in the results of both elections, but it's not like the Democratic candidates were purity tested. Harris was actively facilitating an unpopular genocide with Biden and being actively protested daily and had massive global, nationwide, and campus protests and still got 75M voters, including strong relative turnout from the left because she was a better option than Trump on basically every issue.
8
kittenTakeover Mar 26, 2026 +10
I mean that shows how much leeway men are given by society. Any woman who was that offensive with her language would have never made it through primaries.
10
zithftw Mar 26, 2026 +64
That’s because democrat voters have standards. Fortunately/unfortunately
64
kittenTakeover Mar 26, 2026 +24
I don't think a Republican woman would have been able to avoid judgement.
24
plusacuss Mar 26, 2026 +64
I think anyone claiming gender didnt play a role are being disingenuous but I don't think that the person you are replying to is wrong either. The reasons why dems lost in 2024 are multi-faceted
64
No_Introduction2103 Mar 26, 2026 +26
Exactly and she barely lost to someone who strait up lied about every one of his promises his followers are just deranged and make excuses for every single thing he has walked back on.
26
Preeng Mar 26, 2026 +55
>Shoehorned candidates lose. That's why Hilary lost, that's why Kamala lost. Neither had truly competitive primaries. They lost because Americans are f****** idiots. The choices were fascism or not fascism. You shouldn't need to be swooned to vote against fascism. You are only hurting yourself.
55
ThickReplacement7811 Mar 26, 2026 +44
> You shouldn't need to be swooned to vote against fascism. This right here is the problem with the current DNC. They don’t feel obligated to convince anyone to vote for them. They act like the choice is self-evident, when it’s been proven time and time again to not be so. You have to convince people to vote for you, even when the choices are fascism and not-fascism.
44
yo2sense Mar 26, 2026 +11
There are different ways to apportion the blame but the point is that there is something wrong with Americans as a whole. Someone so obviously incompetent and evil as Trump should have no chance.
11
Pennwisedom Mar 26, 2026 +10
You're right, but people will do anything but blame people who actually voted for Trump.
10
Noname_acc Mar 26, 2026 +25
This is a thought, but does it serve any purpose other than expressing indignation? The DNC cannot control how voters behave. The DNC can control how it campaigns, how it messages, who it supports, what policies it embraces, how it engages in outreach, etc. If you just want to be impotently angry, blame voters. If you don't want to live in a world where the dumbest, most obviously vile fascists consistently defeat democrats, then blame democrats.
25
needlestack Mar 26, 2026 +5
You’re not wrong, but a shoehorned candidate would still have been better than Trump. So it’s still their fault. The DNC screwed up and so did their fickle voters. Both can be true. The result was the worst administration in history. Also, Hillary’s primary was fine. She actually won. The hacked emails came out and showed nothing nefarious. If Comey hadn’t tipped the scales — releasing investigation rumors about her that turned out to be nothing and simultaneously hiding investigations into Trump that turned out to be serious — things very well could have gone the other direction.
5
The_Lost_Jedi Mar 26, 2026 +6
And ironically, sometimes the hand-picked candidate is the better one. Conor Lamb was vilified for being favored by Pelosi, yet look how John Fetterman turned out. I'd still rather have Fetterman than Dr. Oz, but holy f*** Lamb was owed an apology over all that. More importantly though, it's worth understanding that the trend since Reagan has been one of voters giving knee-jerk preference to Republicans, and the reason the DNC is so shitty is partly because the way they learned to cope with that was by moving to center / right, and offering Reagan-Lite, some of the neoliberal economics but paired with progress on social issues (instead of regression). I think it's long since time that changed, but we need voters to demand it, and to demand candidates that represent that change. Because when the voters demand progressive ideas, then you'll very quickly see a lot of the old guard either retire, or swiftly change their tunes. That's exactly what happens when there's a change in the party. It's why the Republicans are now all pro-Trump, because the anti-Trump ones either changed their tune (like JD Vance) or retired/were primaried out (like Liz Cheney). A similar thing happened to the Democrats when the Third Way/DLC/Clintonites displaced the old New Deal-Great Society liberals in the early 90s.
6
spaceribs Mar 26, 2026 +4
I get in more arguments with these democrats than any other group at this point, they fundamentally _cannot accept_ how out of touch they are.
4
Andovars_Ghost Mar 26, 2026 +38
Because it shows them as corporatist & AIPAC-loving assholes, and while better than Republicans, that’s like being the tallest midget.
38
Oleg101 Mar 26, 2026 +173
Old Chuck definitely is the main person to blame when it comes to pushing Mills. He’s also a moron for endorsing Haley Stevens in Michigan for Senate for retiring Gary Peter’s seat, basically a center-right corporate candidate for Senate. If he really doesn’t want to endorse the progressive candidate (Abdul El-Sayed) then at least push the center-left candidate Mallory McMorrow. Or even better, he should just stay out of the way. This all being said, I’ll just be glad if Susan Collins is finally gone from the Senate a year from now.
173
RegularLeading5200 Mar 26, 2026 +130
Schumer couldn't even bring himself to endorse his own party's nominee in the NYC mayoral race. He's a fossil who refuses to move forward with the party. But he's also become a toxic endorsement in many ways. Juliana Stratton ran on vowing to not vote for him for Majority Leader and comfortably won.
130
Sptsjunkie Mar 26, 2026 +31
It's funny how quickly Vote Blue No Matter Who or growing the tent and not having purity tests goes out the window as soon as the left starts winning and gaining real power. All the normal Democratic operative and establishment accounts on Twitter are also trying to go after Sayed for doing a rally with Hasaan Piker (and Summer Lee). I don't agree with everything Piker has said. But after spending months talking about how we need a Joe Rogan of the left and defending Harris doing rallies with Cheaney and Cuban, it's funny how there is a coordinated effort to smear someone for rallying with a popular media personality with a large, young audience we need to reach.
31
OrganicDoom2225 Mar 26, 2026 +24
Schumer is a loyal to Isreal and the 200 state side Jewish Billionaires. He won't support a Muslim period.
24
GrallochThis Mar 26, 2026 +5
Where does that 200 figure come from? I don’t see it after a few searches. Thanks.
5
justsomebro10 Mar 26, 2026 +54
Beyond washed. Him letting his own caucus defect during the shutdown was the nail in the coffin. McConnell would never.
54
youarelookingatthis Mar 26, 2026 +36
Schumer and Jeffries are nowhere near the leaders that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi were.
36
ides205 Mar 26, 2026 +7
All of the corruption, none of the savvy.
7
porkbellies37 Mar 26, 2026 +3
I just want to emphasize that primaries are EXACTLY where you need to get the change crowd out. This is where you push for everything you want.  The general election is where you choose the best alternative. Yes, it’s more defensive while the primary is more offensive. 
3
AceSidewinder13 Mar 26, 2026 +97
You're exactly right. Love or hate Collins, she has seniority. Which is definitely a thing in the Senate. Mills claims one-term (where have we heard that one before). If, true, then she'll leave and we're back to square one. But if she lies and tries to run again, then she'll be way too old to be a multi-term Senator. So it's a lose-lose. The other option, if Platner is the genuine article and follows his campaign promises. Then we got a 41 year old progressive who might actually do good work in the Senate. If he does a good job, he'll get re-elected. And won't be one foot in the grave for a change. I'm not a Maine constituent, but I know who I would be voting for. Just sayin'.
97
noncongruent Mar 26, 2026 +22
The people who want Mills on the ballot are hoping she'll lose to Collins, but also realize that if she wins she'll be in her 80s for most of her six year term and has a high risk of ending up like Feinstein, non compos mentis and unable to cast a Democratic vote in Congress.
22
Osama_been_Chargin Mar 26, 2026 +10
Mills is running explicitly to keep a younger choice option from winning the Democratic primary. It's honestly daft why she's believes running for "one" 6 year term as a promise is an acceptable compromise on her elderly age. Absolutely not. Like everyone knows exactly why you put your hat so late in this ring, granny. And Mainers see right through it. I'm of the belief that Schumer picked Mills so he could feel younger in comparison. That, or he really wants Collins to keep her seat since he's the most reliable controlled opposition you could find.
10
boyyhowdy Mar 26, 2026 +215
Dem leadership would rather lose to fascists and keep control of their party than beat republicans with progressives and lose control of their party and all the political power they have.
215
Eastern_Pin_5567 Mar 26, 2026 +85
And the Dems love to fundraise off our country being dismantled. They’re wringing their hands, wailing and begging for money like they aren’t partially responsible for what’s happened. They abandoned New Deal principles for corporate money and now we’re all paying the price for their greed and ignorance.
85
FrogsOnALog Mar 26, 2026 +54
Harris ran on taxing billionaires more and making things like the EITC and CTC permanent. Universal healthcare seems like it could have been pretty cool, too. Y’all have no clue what the f*** you’re talking about lol
54
flumydumdum Mar 26, 2026 +39
Biden was also the most progressive president in a long while, even more than Obama. While Harris may not have been the ideal progressive candidate that we want, she would have moved in the right direction. I still believe the whole "Harris is not progressive enough" movement was in part at least, a republican/russian ploy as well. They tried the same thing with Kat Abughazaleh just a few days ago.
39
FrogsOnALog Mar 26, 2026 +14
I’m and FDR democratic in that I want democrats to control Congress for a decade+. She would have been just fine if we went lasting change we need a Congress to send them some f****** laws to sign. Americans (especially many Redditors) seem to prefer tax cuts and punishing everyone else instead though.
14
snuggans Mar 26, 2026 +15
>Dem leadership would rather lose to fascists and keep control of their party than beat republicans with progressives and lose control of their party and all the political power they have. its the voters who pick, though. ya'll keep talking about "shoehorn this", "leadership that", but its the majority of voters who didn't pick Bernie twice, or any time a progressive doesn't make it through the primary. and let me remind you that Trump won the popular vote, maybe instead of treating voters like some sort of untouchables, it's actually time to acknowledge that people are stupid on a wide scale. ya'll keep acting like Dems havent passed many good bills (and thus have offered "nothing"), and that theres Machiavellian conspiracies, and "controlled opposition", that talk only demotivates voters
15
josefjohann Mar 26, 2026 +11
Leadership plays a role in recruitment, financing, advice and campaign infrastructure, as well as managing internal procedural levers for things like nomination processes and (at least to some degree) cultural influence and messaging in favor of preferred candidates or against disliked ones. It's not one or the other, voters definitely shoot themselves in the foot also, but the Dem leadership helps talk them through aiming at their foot and taking off the safety.
11
GrafZeppelin127 Mar 26, 2026 +9
Good thing it’s up to us and not them, then. Republicans kicked out their establishment twice in the last 20 years, and the Dems could do the same—but they’ve been largely content and complacent since the ‘90s, and haven’t cleared house since then. I don’t see much of that complacency and contentment anymore.
9
sportsfan113 Mar 26, 2026 +37
Choosing an 80 year old was insane. I am so over electing people that should have been retired years ago.
37
Alone_Reserve_2131 Mar 26, 2026 +14
So, instead put the GOP (Guardians of Pedo's) billionaire scumbags in charge of EVERYFUCKINGTHING? Yeah that'll work.
14
Edogawa1983 Mar 26, 2026 +3
Not the best person to use as an example though
3
Nearbyatom Mar 26, 2026 +9
I get it that the voters don't want another old guard, but it doesn't excuse them from staying at home in November. Any democrat is better than a MAGAt. At this point, ALL GOP (guardians of the pedophile) are MAGAts
9
AuthorCurtisLow Mar 26, 2026 +3
You're right that they shouldn't stay home, but this is one of the reasons they did. They've disillusioned so many voters, who are also getting fed "both sides are the same" propaganda on their algorithms, to the point where millions of people just stayed home.  The Democratic party could've mitigated this by actually putting someone up that people like instead of pulling their 82 year old off stage a couple months before the election and giving liberal/left voters no choice but to vote for a VP that got crushed in the primaries when she ran for president herself. But instead they would rather shoot themselves in the foot and let America slide further into fascism than let the progressive wave remove them from power.  And the worst part is that they'll probably do it again. 
3
HugsForUpvotes Mar 26, 2026 +57
Well the "status" quo is actually doing very well in primaries so far this year so I doubt they're too worried. Also, Platner is probably the single most problematic "progressive" running today. I'd vote for him over a Republican but lets be clear - he's has a lot of neonazi smoke around him, and I don't buy that he was unaware of it until it became scandal. His Nazi tattoo that is prominent on every famous Nazi in cinema that he "didn't know" was a Nazi tattoo. He's now been on at least two neo-nazi podcasts - one of which he said he's a big fan of the show. He retweeted another neo-nazi. This is a lot.
57
Crow290 Mar 26, 2026 +48
He's also retweeted a lot of homophobic things as well, this is going to be another Fetterman/Sinema moment because people on the left are more focused on populist rhetoric than the clear warning signs right in front of them. It's insane to me that the same people that would usually bite the head off of anyone even hinting at Nazi things would just wave away constant warning signs. So mad at the establishment that they're about to vote in a Nazi for simply having populist talking points.
48
Allydarvel Mar 26, 2026 +22
Same people shouting for Tulsi Gabbard to run with Bernie 9 years ago
22
Own-Run8201 Mar 26, 2026 +12
Fetterman was Bernie endorsed.
12
Bittererr Mar 26, 2026 +18
>He's also retweeted a lot of homophobic things as well, First I'm hearing of this. I've heard of the Reddit comments, I've heard of him retweeting people who have a history of tweeting bad things, but I've not heard about him "retweeting a lot of homophobic things". Do you have more information on this?
18
Dejected_gaming Mar 26, 2026 +17
The reddit comments were 13+ years ago. People can change a lot in that kind of time frame, and he's been willing to take accountability for it.
17
Youareposthuman Mar 26, 2026 +32
This is where people lose me. Don’t we WANT someone who can say “I was on the other side of these issues once upon a time and here’s how I evolved my thinking?” Isn’t that just objectively, all around better than a milquetoast candidate who stands for status maintenance because they’ve lived their whole life prepping for public office??
32
Dejected_gaming Mar 26, 2026 +31
Agreed. From what im aware of, Mills actually vetoed a bill that would help get through Maines' backlog of r*** kits. Platner used his campaign to help push it through to get it passed along with a state lawmaker. That doesn't seem to me like something a neo-nazi that's lying to us would do.
31
HugsForUpvotes Mar 26, 2026 +17
Do we? I remember when Cheney gave one of the best endorsements of my life and then Kamala got shit on for being a Republican. For the record, the endorsement was: >"In our nation's 248-year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump. He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him. He can never be trusted with power again. As citizens, we each have a duty to put country above partisanship to defend our Constitution. That is why I will be casting my vote for Vice President Kamala Harris." Wow; I can't believe she'd endorse that message from a previously elected Republican VP. Reddit Leftists, which aren't particularly representative of even American Leftists - little less the general election voter, have a double standard going on. If you can forgive a 30 year old for making homophobic remarks and a 40 year old for having a Nazi tattoo, you can probably forgive Hillary for pivoting to expanding Obamacare after failing to get enough support for a single payer healthcare system.
17
Sptsjunkie Mar 26, 2026 +7
So as you are pointing out, the actual Democratic nominee did rally with Cheaney and Cuban. After Biden had Cheaney and Kasich as the DNC convention in 2020. So the party, the nominees, and most centrist supporters were totally fine with redemption and growth for these very anti-LGBT, pro war, anti-worker, anti-choice Republicans. They also believed in redemption for Hillary Clinton who called some young black men superpredators and was against equal rights for LGBT people until close to 2010. And for Joe Biden who was known as the Senator from MBNA for taking money from the big Delaware banks and then pushing for financial deregulation and making it impossible to discharge student loan debt in bankruputcy, was anti-bussing, attacked Anita Bryant, wrote the 1993 crime bill, was anti-LGBT, supported the Hyde Amendment, and pounded the table for the Iraq War. Hillary and Biden were allowed to evolve from heinous positions they heled in their 40s-70s and apologized for. Yet now, we suddenly want to purity test a progressive based on comments from his 20s. It's all just stupid and factional. People don't actually care about 80% of what they complain about and are simply shifting their supposed views for the sake of attacks.
7
Bittererr Mar 26, 2026 +11
I'm guessing the poster above isn't going to come back with a source then.
11
noncongruent Mar 26, 2026 +6
Jacobin did a deep dive on his entire reddit history, apparently 30K comments and posts, and they arrived at a very different conclusion about Platner based on that history. You should google their article on that, it paints a very different picture of him than what the cherrypickers paint here.
6
naththegrath10 Mar 26, 2026 +1047
And Collins. That part is important since so many neo-libs on here want to push the idea that left candidates are unelectable
1047
Rezahn Mar 26, 2026 +293
Polls this far out against Collins seem a little meaningless to me. In 2020, Gideon led Collins for the entire race and still lost pretty hard. Dem lead is reassuring, but not that much.
293
Grundlestiltskin_ Mar 26, 2026 +127
Meh, Gideon never has a chance tbf. Wasn’t born in Maine and was from the rich part of the state. Those candidates almost never win in Maine. It’s a weird place. Platner is a Mainer and ticks a bunch of other boxes that make him a stronger candidate in the state.
127
Mellow_Toninn Mar 26, 2026 +104
And possibly more importantly is that Collins is significantly less popular now than she was in 2020 - by about 15 points. 2020 was prior to Roe being overturned as a result of her confirming Kavanaugh/Barrett.
104
kterr101 Mar 26, 2026 +33
Maybe. But my super liberal grandmother was always loyal to Collins for saving a bunch of military bases back in the day even with the all her recent decisions. She has a weird hold on a lot of Mainers that polls seem to miss
33
max_power1000 Mar 26, 2026 +8
Probably the same reason Manchin was able to hold on in WV even after the state slid hard right.
8
Rezahn Mar 26, 2026 +9
I speak to a lot of 60+ Dems who recall two major points in her career that they latch onto. First is the funding she secured to keep Bath Ironworks (big shipbuilding facility) busy. Second is her vote on the Affordable Care Act. Those, plus her early career of portraying herself as very moderate, have locked a lot of democratic votes up for her. Especially from people who vote but stay on the fringes of politics (which i feel like is most people, especially here). I'm not sure if that is similar to Manchin's story.
9
greentrillion Mar 26, 2026 +3
Will people still give her credit for those things after supporting Trump who burned everything to the ground?
3
Rezahn Mar 26, 2026 +6
I mean, maybe. They did in 2020, after she bent over backwards to allow Trump to do anything he wanted for four years.
6
Grundlestiltskin_ Mar 26, 2026 +10
Yeah, and tbf Gideon was much closer to winning than any of the prior couple of races
10
xXxT4xP4y3R_401kxXx Mar 26, 2026 +24
I'd also heard from a lot of Mainers that Gideon's "blanket the airwaves" strategy backfired. She had a commanding money advantage and she'd used that to air ads constantly and I've seen a lot of second hand anecdata pointing to that volume of ads turning voters off.
24
soulsoda Mar 26, 2026 +24
A commanding money advantage she didn't use optimally. She had like 15-20mil left over and her messaging sucked. "I'm against trump and not collins" is not a campaign.
24
svrtngr Mar 26, 2026 +17
That's been the Democratic messaging since 2016, to be fair.
17
smalls_1804 Mar 26, 2026 +3
Very true but all Dem polling was over-rated because it was a presidential year and polls just underestimate Trump's support. I think Collins is cooked no matter what tbh
3
jediporcupine Mar 26, 2026 +80
The issue for corporate democrats is they can’t control the left candidates. They need a safe candidate who won’t rock the boat or disrupt the status quo, because they benefit from it just as much as the Republicans. Someone more leftist or progressive disrupts their gravy train.
80
Ceorl_Lounge Mar 26, 2026 +31
Good. I can accept it occasionally going wrong (Fetterman) over keeping the same fossilized shits in office.
31
FancyEmployee8672 Mar 26, 2026 +524
of course he does look at the milquetoast geriatric fucks he’s up against
524
jediporcupine Mar 26, 2026 +373
Well that’s just it. Chuck Schumer’s answer to Susan Collins is someone who will be the oldest freshman U.S. Senator in history. If Mainers wanted an old career politician who is just another moderate boomer, they’ll simply stick with Collins.
373
Jeremisio Mar 26, 2026 +171
But you see, it was her “turn”
171
jediporcupine Mar 26, 2026 +149
That’s how the Democratic establishment operates. It’s their favorite losing strategy.
149
MONSTERTACO Mar 26, 2026 +36
It's also textbook conservatism, wonder why it doesn't resonate with voters?
36
max_power1000 Mar 26, 2026 +9
At this point, we have a conservative party and a reactionary party in the US. This is especially with the absorption of a not insignificant number of former neocons into the dem ranks including woke Bill Kristol.
9
OriginalMushroom86 Mar 26, 2026 +29
I saw something from Schumer saying Mills is best because she has won several statewide races. Who gives a shit if she’s won other races. That doesn’t mean she’s the best candidate this time. People are starving for change and Platner represents that. Yes, Platner has made mistakes but IMO, he’s owned up to them and seems to have grown and learned. Don’t we want leaders who are real people that live, learn and grow instead of leaders who are outright pricks that don’t apologize or learn?
29
jediporcupine Mar 26, 2026 +9
The whole statewide race line is tired, too. She barely took Maine’s second district against Paul LePage, who isn’t nearly as strong a candidate as people have made him out to be. True, it’s a conservative-leaning district, but LePage statewide has benefited from third parties. He’s not a strong overall candidate. Susan Collins is. Mills is extremely unpopular among Republicans and she’s not peeling off Republican votes from Collins. Furthermore, if moderates wanted an old moderate boomer who has been in office since Calvin Coolidge, they’ll just stick with Collins. But if Chuck Schumer was good at strategy, we wouldn’t be as screwed as a nation right now.
9
P1xelHunter78 Mar 26, 2026 +25
Yes. It’s basically a referendum on purity tests and growth as an individual. I think 80% of men who aren’t far left would had many things in their past around their early to mid 20’s that would be considered problematic In modern politics. I know I sure as shit do. The question is, can we accept people become better once they get educated and learn? I think Platner is worth the gamble over an 80 year old. Worst case scenario he’s not much better than Collins. Collins says the right “moderate” but is not a moderate. She votes party line when it really matters. She’s a MINO
25
GrafZeppelin127 Mar 26, 2026 +19
And now that everything’s online since you were a toddler poking at a tablet, we have *got* to get over using past posting history as a purity test, or else never run a single candidate younger than Gen X for fear of something embarrassing coming out in their posting history. People who were perfect little angels since they were children are too rare to be a viable population to draw our political representatives from.
19
doofenhurtz Mar 26, 2026 +12
Yeah... i'm elder gen Z (97), and I often think about how boned I would be if I ever ran for office. The crazy thing is, I don't even know *what* would bone me. I just know I was on Twitter at 14, I was a shithead, and it can't be good.
12
GrafZeppelin127 Mar 26, 2026 +9
I was never on Twitter, barely on Facebook before quitting, and never really had any particularly controversial opinions in my youth. Even then, in a nearly best-case scenario, I’m *certain* oppo researchers could fill a dozen attack ads with things I’ve posted that are taken out of context or that seem dumb or horrible even if they really weren’t that bad at the time. I was a Republican briefly as a teenager, but got over that phase by the time I was even old enough to vote in my first presidential election, but I’m sure someone could spin my past appreciation of John McCain into me being a secret sleeper agent or something.
9
hawaiianhamtaro Mar 26, 2026 +4
I could never run for office. The thought of opposition research finding my one direction stan tumblr haunts me
4
scottfaracas Mar 26, 2026 +62
You’re telling me folks aren’t excited to elect another 80 year old to Congress?
62
Catcher3321 Mar 26, 2026 +111
Couple things I noticed in this poll. 1. Platner's support is still coming from mostly young people. They end up turning out the least in elections. Turnout is generally the biggest source of error in polls. People don't really admit they aren't voting. If turnout is looking low on election day, this race is much closer. 2. With all primary polls, it's hard to poll primaries. It's hard to gather a good breakout of the different factions of each party because there's no registering as a progressive Democrat, a moderate Democrat, etc 3. Platner's strength among young, high income, high education men and much lower support outside these groups continues to fascinate me. 4. Platner is a couple points ahead of Mills for the general, but there is a big red flag in there: only 58% of Mills supporters said they'd vote for Platner if he's the nominee. Compared to 80% of Platner supporters who said they'd vote for Mills if she's the nominee. This means that Platner is running ahead of Mills due to winning a lot of Independents who don't vote in primaries. (Mills and Platner both are pulling less than 5% of Republicans). Since we have open primaries, these people are generally low turnout even in generals. So to actually pull ahead of Mills, he needs good turnout from the lowest turnout groups Edit to add a 5th point. We are the whitest state in the nation, so this doesn't matter much and could be small sample size among non whites doing weird things. But interesting to note that Platner vs Collins in the general, whites are Platner +10 and non whites are Collins+9
111
NewYorker15 Mar 26, 2026 +85
For your point about 3: as a queer man, who’s blue collar and doesn’t have a high income I have reservations about Planter despite being extremely progressive and left. We just have to trust that he’s going to do the right thing and stay progressive despite no voting record to back up his promises. Also his history has a ton of problematic moments (nazi tat, blackwater, comments on r***, etc). So at a time when LGBTQ+ people are being erased and having their rights eroded, a guy with a Nazi tattoo that worked at Blackwater is asking us to trust that he’ll protect LGBTQ+ people when he gets in office. That’s a hard sell. Especially after we’ve seen Sinema and Fetterman. I know it’s nuanced, I know people make mistakes and grown, but I’m just really glad that I’m not a Mainer and don’t have to make the decision between Planter and Mills.
85
disastrousanddull Mar 26, 2026 +30
People should have reservations, they're being asked to make a risky and scary gamble with a prime example still right there making a mess.
30
DJ_Homicide Mar 26, 2026 +21
> We just have to trust that he’s going to do the right thing and stay progressive despite no voting record to back up his promises I can't believe how many people refuse to accept that Tulsi Gabbad and John Fetterman had the Bernie Midas Touch, and look how they turned out. You're right to think Platner is sus given the history there.
21
oath2order Mar 26, 2026 +4
> Also his history has a ton of problematic moments (nazi tat, blackwater, comments on r***, etc). Not to mention whatever Collins has saved for the general. Because all this? These are **not** his only skeletons. She's a bulwark of the state for a reason; she **knows** how to win elections in a purple-lean-blue state.
4
sockpuppetzero Mar 26, 2026 +27
Platner is clearly lying about his Nazi tat, which I find pretty disqualifying. The fact that he has one is bad enough, but lying about it on top of that? I don't live in Maine, so I won't be voting, but as someone quite progressive and left, personally I'd take a pass on Platner, go with the establishment Dem, and wait for a reliable progressive candidate that doesn't carry such an open risk of tarnishing the movement.
27
fleemfleemfleemfleem Mar 26, 2026 +14
If he had said something like: "Look I used to believe some pretty odious things, but my views have changed. I'm a better person now, and I repudiate those views." I'd feel better. After seeing multiple candidates who ran to the left of opponents turn out to be opportunists, Fetterman, Sinema, Gabbard, etc. I'm nervous that's what's going to happen here.
14
SuckMyRedditorD Mar 26, 2026 +12
Sounds like the kind of candidate that will betray the party on day one. One doesn't tattoo one's body on a whim even if you're drunk. It's a huge commitment. It's an even bigger commitment to keep it. Guys a plant.
12
hellolovely1 Mar 26, 2026 +5
I know, I just hope he really has reformed and won't be another Fetterman. I could see getting that tattoo by accident, but not keeping it for 20 years.
5
NewYorker15 Mar 26, 2026 +5
The more I think about the tattoo the less it seems like an accident. A tattoo shop with that tattoo listed I’m sure would have had other nazi symbols, right? And it’s a well known nazi symbol, though he did get at a time when the internet was just starting to become widespread. And also, no one he was with recognized it? Idk it’s very sus to me. Also I just realized today that his name isn’t PLANT-er
5
l0st1nP4r4d1ce Mar 26, 2026 +8
Whoever goes against Collins needs to hammer her 'one term pledge' in addition to her being a simp for Trump.
8
qchisq Mar 26, 2026 +191
Why is the choice between an 80 year old, a guy with a Nazi tattoo and Susan Collins?
191
Mr-Meow-Sir Mar 26, 2026 +44
'merica
44
prettyobviousthrow Mar 27, 2026 +1
I honestly don't get how people are legitimately going to vote for a Nazi tattoo guy. Not my state so not my place, but that should have ended the campaign immediately.
1
A_Rogue_GAI Mar 26, 2026 +24
Because the Democratic party has created a political environment where people believe the guy who had a nazi tattoo is more genuine than the establishment candidate.
24
qchisq Mar 26, 2026 +19
I don't doubt whether or not his genuine. I doubt his judgment. Putting a totenkopf on your chest and keeping it for 18 years is bad judgement. Going into a primary where the opposing party is the closest thing the US have seen to fascism with a totenkopf on your chest is horrible judgment
19
sailorsmile Mar 26, 2026 +24
Isn’t it awful? I don’t really get why some people online are cheering so hard for any of these outcomes.
24
SeductiveSunday Mar 26, 2026 +7
No one is forced into running for office. Maine had better choices like Gideon or Bellows but turned them down to reelect Collins. Maybe most Maine voters prefer electing older women. Also (almost) no one here complained when 80+ Sanders ran for reelection.
7
pierceatlas Mar 26, 2026 +6
I think he's the best choice, but I pray he isn't another Fetterman, I really do. 
6
FlummoxedGaoler Mar 26, 2026 +14
I know nothing about these people, but you can tell who The Hill likes. They list the dirt on Platner, and casually hand wave away criticisms of Mills. Media doing its thing.
14
No_Researcher3204 Mar 26, 2026 +15
Abolish the 2- Party system and overturn Citizens United and remove all the Lobbyists.
15
FatherPot Mar 26, 2026 +19
Worried about the nazi thing. But the military is very right-winged. I had a similar experience, went in the navy Maga, and a few years later, once I left my conservative bubble, I became a commie. So perhaps he's had a change of heart. Or maybe he's just doing the whole populist thing.
19
tuframnedox Mar 26, 2026 +203
I don’t really have a pony in the race, because I’m not a Mainer, but I don’t trust Blackwater Bonaduce. Politics is all about relationships, and I’m worried about someone with Platner’s Rolodex. I deeply hope my fears are unfounded, because I like so much about the guy. But the flags are GOP-red, and that makes me uncomfortable. Again: could be, and want to be, proven wrong. But I won’t be convinced until I see how he handles being an elected official or how he shows up if he loses his bid.
203
iuieioiai Mar 26, 2026 +69
I agree with you but even if he’s another Fetterman wolf in sheep’s clothing populist progressive, it demonstrates that politicians need to at least pay lip service to the left to win elections. It shows that lane is no longer too narrow in a fairly moderate state like Maine. It shows the average voter has had it with the establishment tools of oligarchy. Now we just need a critical mass in the senate and house rather than a squad.
69
jediporcupine Mar 26, 2026 +46
And beyond that, Platner turning out to be a turncoat is still an improvement over Collins.
46
Bittererr Mar 26, 2026 +49
This is true, just like Fetterman is much preferable to Dr. Oz.
49
Kujaix Mar 26, 2026 +31
This is actually true. Plenty of mundane but still important things Fetterman votes the party line on. Now what is inexcusable is why he's allowed to be on committees.
31
zboy23 Mar 26, 2026 +7
Because you'll lose him on more votes if you strip him of committees. There is some level of appeasement you have to do to keep his vote as often as you do. If dems gain four senate seats this year, it's still razor thin margins of one vote to push things through. You're going to need him.
7
Plappedudel Mar 26, 2026 +20
For what it's worth, Platner has personally said that Fetterman should be voted out of office for supporting the Iran war. Before he entered politics, he also called himself a socialist online. The only area where he seems to deviate strongly from the progressive left is gun rights, but that might actually win him the election in a rural state like Maine.
20
CandidHistorian4105 Mar 26, 2026 +27
The problem is “says” vs “does” Sinema was also saying all the right shit until she was safely inside.
27
Cicero912 Mar 26, 2026 +8
Thats really the big difference between pacifc coast + east coast urban progressives and rural/midwest/southern progressives. One advocates for common sense gun ownership and control, the other for banning as much as possible (oversimplification, but mostly holds true). Plenty of people on the progressive left hold similar views about the right to bear arms.
8
thishasntbeeneasy Mar 26, 2026 +8
I think this is common outside of Maine. I see many comments worried that he'll be like Fetterman. Businessman, oyster fisherman, veteran... to come off a a potentially progressive democrat is definitely not common. Even a lot of the fishing industry around the Gulf of Maine is very anti-science regarding climate change and wind power.
8
walterpeck3 Mar 26, 2026 +26
Also, ya know, the huge nazi tattoo
26
husky429 Mar 26, 2026 +19
I think the difference between him and, say, a Fetterman is that Platner has year of history of being uber-progressive. All his old Reddit comments come across as a left-wing troll who was online too much. He talked about being a mushroom-taking communist who hates the cops and stuff like that. Obviously the comments about women were pretty offensive, but the question for me isn't about what he said, but would he vote to codify Roe by law? And the answer is a definitive "hell yeah."
19
dragunityag Mar 26, 2026 +23
What history? He has never held office. If we're counting reddit comments as proof of progressive values then yall have truly lost the plot.
23
Describing_Donkeys Mar 26, 2026 +22
All of the fears are valid, I would much rather take the chance and fail than stick with the establishment nonetheless.
22
blaqsupaman Mar 26, 2026 +21
I would rather just keep the Republicans out of power by any means necessary, whether it's with progressives or centrist Dems.
21
Old_Boah Mar 26, 2026 +13
The risk of electing neo nazis impacts Jews more than others, I guess
13
Titan7771 Mar 26, 2026 +10
The way I look at it is I’d never accept a GOP candidate having a Nazi tattoo as being acceptable, why would I allow it in a Dem candidate?
10
jmpinstl Mar 26, 2026 +29
I genuinely don’t know if this is a good thing or not
29
wishcoats Mar 26, 2026 +5
I’m sorry but I only care about who has the best chance in the general. Looks like the polling in the story has both with leads over Collins, with him having a slightly larger lead. That works for me!
5
jediporcupine Mar 26, 2026 +5
Platner across the board has polled better in general election matchups. If the goal is to beat Collins, Mills isn’t the person to do it.
5
MattTheSmithers Mar 26, 2026 +113
All the people screaming “NEO-LIBS HATE LEFTIST CANDIDATES!” are gonna be shocked when the dude with a Nazi tattoo turns out to be the next Sinema/Fetterman. It’s like Charlie Brown and the football.
113
gringledoom Mar 26, 2026 +90
Are you suggesting that the former Blackwater mercenary might not be a committed leftist???
90
czarfalcon Mar 26, 2026 +50
I mean, I don’t have a horse in this race because I’m not a Mainer, but I’ve listened to some of his interviews and by all accounts it seems like for him, at the time, signing a PMC contract was a natural progression as a former marine. And if anything, it seems like his time with them was what really disillusioned him towards the whole system.
50
french_snail Mar 26, 2026 +37
I live in Maine and also am an army veteran. Unfortunately sometimes you have to participate in the system to realize how fucked it is. You know that comedy skit where the German soldiers go “are we the baddies?” That’s a real scenario and I had it myself while serving so I can relate to Platner going through the same thing 
37
shafty17 Mar 26, 2026 +15
crazy how many leftists are just blatantly admitting that they don't actually believe in personal growth or reform
15
DreamBigLikeDad Mar 26, 2026 +36
As a Mainer, I cannot wait to vote for Platner in the Fall. Hopefully we finally retire Collins, the old hag.
36
Meph616 Mar 26, 2026 +18
I'm not going to be shocked when he goes full Fetterman. But in the off chance that he isn't a plant and actually means half of what he says then... yay. Still sucks that it's from a dude with trash judgement and questionable honesty. Nobody believes his lie that he *gee golly shucks* just didn't know his Nazi tattoo was in fact... a Nazi tattoo. Couldn't just own up to being an edgelord. And then the rushed cover up that didn't even cover the entire tattoo. Again... trash tier judgement capabilities. I hate that this dice roll of a human is the best that Maine has to hope for. They deserve better.
18
cyxrus Mar 26, 2026 +40
All that matters is if he can beat Collins
40
Sennten Mar 26, 2026 +36
Ask the former Fetterman supporters how true that actually is
36
RegularLeading5200 Mar 26, 2026 +16
Fetterman is still significantly better than Oz would've been, and I despise Fetterman.
16
cyxrus Mar 26, 2026 +39
We can’t assume everyone is a fetterman
39
PuntiffSupreme Mar 26, 2026 +48
This guy is a stronger candidate, but it's not media spin to be uncomfortable with a former blackwater merc who got a Nazi tattoo. He claims that he didn't know what it was, but can we really believe that when his favorite war movie has that same symbol on the Nazis hats? Maybe he's changed and maybe he's an upgrade over collins, but people concerned with his background have a real reason to worry.
48
Treesaregreen2 Mar 26, 2026 +7
His campaign is being run by Fetterman staffers https://youtu.be/67MSWVJj5js?si=tIb9NkYP7UlPksZd
7
Nervous_Otter69 Mar 26, 2026 +21
Fetterman sucks and absolutely needs to be primaried, but even as brain damaged as he is, he still votes Dem 91% of the time. So yes, I do believe him winning over a Republican was better than not.
21
swarf Mar 26, 2026 +17
He votes with dems when they’ll lose no matter what. He switches to Trump support for key moments like to swing the Mullins vote in committee after a GOP defection. That’s not adding any value to Dems and it’s actively making it harder to get good candidates in primary.
17
liquifiedtubaplayer Mar 26, 2026 +6
It's not ideal that the progressive nominee is Platner. It's outright embarrassing that the liberal nominee is Mills.
6
ThreadCountHigh Mar 26, 2026 +19
Good. It’s time for everyone to stop elder abuse via electing geriatrics into office.
19
BigPP69_Gooner Mar 26, 2026 +6
It’s somehow both elders being abused and elders abusing all of us
6
OG_Williker Mar 26, 2026 +12
Crazy that the people who said “if there’s 10 people at a table with one nazi, there are 11 Nazis” and “scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds” are this (former?) nazi’s strongest supporters.
12
cowboyjosh2010 Mar 26, 2026 +4
May he not be another Fetterman.
4
EasyMode556 Mar 26, 2026 +20
The fact that someone with a Nazi tattoo is leading the primary for a major political party for a Senate seat is wild
20
TimothyMimeslayer Mar 26, 2026 +34
Maybe the center right should have chosen someone other than a geriatric to represent them.
34
drew_p_wevos Mar 26, 2026 +33
I worry this guy is going to be another fetterman. Edit:  I’m just not buying it.  Blackwater jobs attract people with certain types of personalities.  Those people don’t change as they get older, in fact they get worse.  I feel the nazi tattoo and the his career choices up until now are big red flags.  There are conservatives out there trying to portray themselves as reformed thinking that will give them authenticity with Democratic voters.  I get why they do it.  Because it works.  It’s working here.  Never underestimate the lies they are willing to tell.
33
Rand-Seagull96734 Mar 26, 2026 +11
💯. Fetterman looked exactly the same vs Connor Lamb. Now people are hoping Connor Lamb will come back and save the day.
11
Treesaregreen2 Mar 26, 2026 +19
Well his campaign is being run by Fetterman staffers so I think you’re right to worry. https://youtu.be/67MSWVJj5js?si=tIb9NkYP7UlPksZd
19
PsychoNicho Mar 26, 2026 +3
Just gonna have to make sure he doesn’t hit his head and completely detach some wires like Fetterman
3
ventin Mar 26, 2026 +3
I sincerely doubt Mills can beat Collins, so maybe there's a chance Platner can.
3
FlopShanoobie Mar 26, 2026 +3
Yet Schumer is pressuring the establishment to continue funding and supporting Mills, who’d be 79 when she would begin her 6 year term.
3
InCarbsWeTrust Mar 26, 2026 +3
I’m glad Mills is airing Platners baggage, the more voters who learn about it now the better.  Collins would time the release for maximum impact.  Seems like the primary is all but over at this point - Mills was quite overrated (including by me).
3
Forwhatitsworth522 Mar 26, 2026 +3
Is this gonna be another Fetterman
3
Atalung Mar 26, 2026 +11
I'm torn on Platner. On one hand (as a former alt right teen turned leftist adult) I recognize that people grow and change and I'm willing to entertain the idea that he has. On the other hand I get a Fetterman vibe off of him, and Mills is not a bad candidate other than her age. I don't live in Maine so my opinion doesn't really matter. I'd still probably vote for him in the primary, but if Mills were 20 years younger it would be a difficult choice.
11
No-Distribution4287 Mar 26, 2026 +7
I don’t really understand The whole I see “fetterman in him” thing what similarities do they have? I feel like people don’t actually remember that race fetterman had always been a weird Zionist even when he ran not to mention his progressivism was low effort in a sense. They both outwardly appear as progressive sure but so does every progressive. Is the former blackwater affiliation worrying sure but i don’t really care rn. We live in a dying country run by private equity looting what’s left. If someone says they’re going to help stop it they have my support. As long as Platner doesn’t get hit with the CIA stroke-gun I think we are fine
7
defectconstraint Mar 26, 2026 +3
> not to mention his progressivism was low effort in a sense. Fetterman was in AmeriCorps, Platner was in the Marines. Fetterman also had a track record of achievements as the mayor of Braddock, PA and the director of its youth program.
3
Atalung Mar 26, 2026 +5
The stroke definitely played a role in Fetterman becoming trash but he was already a shitty person. I've learned more about his career prior to running for Senate and he has a long history of bad behavior. I think my concerns over Platner are mostly just the similar vibes. They're both populist left wing candidates with a questionable past. That being said I don't live in Maine and have no influence on this race, so I try not to worry about it
5
Arizona_Pete Mar 26, 2026 +8
Planter has vulnerabilities, but he’s still an interesting guy. Hope he’s able to defeat Collins in the general.
8
Jubal81 Mar 26, 2026 +4
"An Emerson College Polling survey released on Thursday showed Platner leading Mills by about 27 points in the Senate Democratic contest, with Platner receiving 55 percent support while the Maine governor received 28 percent. A separate 17 percent said “someone else” or were undecided. Platner received 48 percent while Collins received 41 percent, and a separate 12 percent said “someone else” or were unsure. "
4
Nooooope Mar 26, 2026 +5
Mainer here. I'll vote for either of them over Collins in the general because democracy is literally at stake, but I'm really hoping one of the other Dem candidates pulls ahead. I could absolutely believe Platner got a Nazi-coded tattoo by accident; I didn't know what a Totenkopf was either. It's a *lot* harder to believe he had this tattoo for nearly 20 years and nobody pointed out what it meant until right before opposition research was about to nail him for it. The usual defense of this in /r/maine is that if you look at his old reddit comments, it really doesn't line up with "secret nazi" vibes, and that is kind of true. But the alternatives are that a) he didn't know for two decades (really unlikely to me) or b) he's just... kind of concerningly dumb to think this wasn't a big deal? And either way, the GOP is going to be dropping loads of money in this race to make sure every low-information voter knows about this. It's 100% going to matter more than substantive issues.
5
KyleAg06 Mar 26, 2026 +4
I just worry this man becomes Fetterman 2.0.
4
FishermanExpensive Mar 26, 2026 +15
Wow, lots of bots working for Susan Collins in here.
15
whatlineisitanyway Mar 26, 2026 +15
I'm disappointed that we didn't get more candidates like Planter to run this cycle. Especially in the house we had an opportunity to really get rid of the bought and paid for politicians on the Dem side. We are missing our Team Party moment.
15
jellofishsponge Mar 26, 2026 +14
You should run This is the bystander effect. AOC was someone I worked with many years ago on the Bernie campaign, they ran for office.
14
Due-Measurement-3315 Mar 26, 2026 +8
Seriously everyone complains but we desperately need normal, progressive-minded people running. There's a problem with everyone wanting better politics but never stepping up to contribute. If we expect everyone else to do it for us we'll be disappointed.
8
OvulatingScrotum Mar 26, 2026 +4
Hey, you just asked an American to step up. That’s a huge ask.
4
LaTosca Mar 26, 2026 +34
Boy I can’t wait for six years of dumbasses in Maine saying “there were no signs! We had no idea Platner was another Fetterman”
34
EffectiveActive6837 Mar 27, 2026 +5
I think he's the next fetterman
5
← Back to Board