· 120 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 11, 2026 at 7:55 PM

Pope Leo XIV denounces the ‘delusion of omnipotence’ he says fuels the US-Israeli war in Iran

Posted by No_Idea_Guy


Pope Leo XIV denounces the 'delusion of omnipotence' he says fuels the US-Israeli war in Iran
AP News
Pope Leo XIV denounces the 'delusion of omnipotence' he says fuels the US-Israeli war in Iran
Pope Leo XIV has denounced the “delusion of omnipotence” that is fueling the U.S.-Israel war in Iran and demanded political leaders stop and negotiate peace.

🚩 Report this post

120 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
nemoknows Apr 11, 2026 +736
A big part of US aggression is the belief that nobody could fight back.
736
Thurak0 Apr 11, 2026 +236
They weren't paying attention the 20 years in Afghanistan then and that is absolute recent history.
236
FenrisCain Apr 11, 2026 +267
But it didnt effect Americans back home at all, that's the point. They live in their little bubble of ignorance, safe on their continent while their troops die and suffer to ruin countries on the other side of the world.
267
ElPuppyNation Apr 11, 2026 +80
Yeah maybe Americans needs a reminder that they aren't untouchable. Did they all forget 9/11? The US should sit the f*** down right now. We haven't seen terrorist attacks with drones yet.
80
BlipBlapBloppityBoop Apr 11, 2026 +192
I get a sense that Americans by and large see 9/11 as them being victims of some unprovoked attack by one-dimensional evil people who simply hate America and liberty and freedom. Not an event of them reaping what they sowed.
192
Former_String8874 Apr 11, 2026 +42
Well said, that's what it boils down to, in a nutshell 🤷🏻‍♀️
42
Hautamaki Apr 12, 2026 +19
Americans certainly saw it that way on 9/12. I think most Americans have learned a lot of valuable lessons about blowback and unintended consequences and whatnot since then. Hence why every military intervention the US did since Iraq polled very badly before hand and only improved its numbers if it was done anyway to major success. Which has been very rare; only example off the top of my head would be the Venezuela kidnapping, and even then, is that even 50%? Or just popular with MAGA? But also, so did Al Qaeda and their later imitators. Yes they landed a good punch on America and accomplished a lot of their philosophical/ideological objectives. But they also got hunted down and killed everywhere they existed. They even got thrown under the bus by the Taliban in Afghanistan, and replaced by ISIS in Iraq, which was then also crushed by a major international coalition headed by the US. Terrorists have also learned a valuable lesson about launching direct attacks on America; if you do it at all, keep it small enough to be forgotten about. Since 9/11 terrorists have largely focused their fire in Israel and Europe when not in their own backyards; the overwhelming majority of victims of terrorism after 9/11 are Muslims in war zones, mainly in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, and all over northern Africa.
19
dhaliman Apr 12, 2026 +4
Thanks for saying this, I would’ve been afraid to say this but this is true.
4
Ok-Yak7370 Apr 12, 2026 -3
They weren't. That is you inventing an imaginary justified Bin Laden.
-3
No_Street8874 Apr 12, 2026 -21
They were victims on 9/11 and unfortunately that justified them starting wars and causing lots of death.
-21
[deleted] Apr 12, 2026 +15
[removed]
15
RecordingSilly6118 Apr 12, 2026 -2
What kind of unorganized bot comment is this? Firstly, The Gulf War was authorized by the UN Security council resolution 678, and supported by the other Gulf States, including UBLs home country of Saudi Arabia, who deployed close to a hundred thousand troops in the coalition. Afghanistan has nothing to do with oil, and the US was supported by the NATO ISAF coalition until 2012. Spamming the first links that you could find on google doesn't mean your argument is good. >Edit: im getting brigaded by hateful people without sources 🤷‍♀️ My Edit: lol of course its a hidden account who's whining about being "Brigaded" by 2 whole people responding to him and not agreeing with everything he says. 10 bucks he's not actually American. Edit 2: Blocked me like he did to the other guy lmao, and stealth edited it to go from "im getting brigaded by hateful people" to "im getting hated on and attacked by people". Being responded to is not being attacked lol.
-2
[deleted] Apr 12, 2026 -13
[deleted]
-13
lupi64 Apr 11, 2026 +9
Timothy McVeigh would beg to differ with some folks.
9
Farabee Apr 12, 2026 +5
The last thing we need is another 9/11. That would only vindicate this regime and solidify support. Iran is going about this the smart way. Choking the world out economically is going to absolutely destroy Trump.
5
Ok-Leader-1824 Apr 12, 2026 +8
Another 9/11 will make countless Americans actually want to fight people rather than feel apathetic.
8
[deleted] Apr 12, 2026 +10
So like Iran, Palestine and Lebanon right now
10
Ok-Leader-1824 Apr 12, 2026 +1
Yep, what comes around is all around
1
AnteaterFormal7291 Apr 11, 2026 +10
Haven't you seen the news? Americans born after 2001 can't remember anything longer than last week because of cell phones and tablets in school
10
No_Street8874 Apr 12, 2026 -11
9/11 is part of what caused this. Many in the U.S. want a more isolationist approach, but 9/11 made it clear to them you either fight in Middle East or at home. They picked the Middle East.
-11
[deleted] Apr 12, 2026 -10
[deleted]
-10
Sacredloch Apr 11, 2026 -20
This comment is insanely contradictory you're so focused on owning the stupid ignorant Americans you aren't even paying attention to what you're saying. "the Americans aren't effected back home at all" "their troops die and suffer on the other side of the world". You yourself aren't even making much sense.
-20
Willrkjr Apr 12, 2026 +2
No, as an American it makes perfect sense. Look at this war. Iranians have been getting bombed, hundreds of civilian deaths, of dead children. And what have Americans suffered? I’ll tell you, like less than 20 dead soldiers, and gas prices are up. The families of soldiers are affected, sure, but we don’t go to work at a hospital praying that Iran won’t blow it up with supersonic jets. Gas is up yeah, but I’m not having to drive by the blown out remains of a school on my way to work as a constant reminder that my little sister’s school might be next. It is simply incomparable. And Americans, yes stupid ignorant Americans - are more angry and focused on the gas prices than they are the actual terrorism we’re committing to these people. Bc that’s the only way they’re affected, literally, and that’s all they care about. Add “selfish” onto that description while we’re at it.
2
Hautamaki Apr 12, 2026 +15
They just thought that the only reason the Afghans successfully fought back was stupid bureacrats and JAGoffs and weak presidents refusing to let the army warcrime their way to a win. They were determined not to repeat that mistake by promising to do the biggest warcrimes ever, warcrimes like you've never seen, warcrimes never thought possible, and then Iran would be forced to surrender when they realized the stupid bureaucrats and JAGoffs and weak presidents were gone and now they were dealing with real manly men and the biggest strongest most beautiful navy ever created.
15
Medallicat Apr 12, 2026 +12
They sucked in Vietnam too. It’s all business. The people are expendable and always have been
12
LangyMD Apr 12, 2026 +6
Unfortunately, the US lucked into a stupidly powerful position in political geography. Nobody close by has the capacity to touch us militarily, and the Atlantic and Pacific oceans make it really, really hard for an opponent to attack us without us noticing first, which allows us to attack them before they're in range of the homeland. This is great if the US is good and moral, but if the US wants to dominate others it results in the homeland basically not caring if the US gets into a war. We just don't fight wars close to home and so don't suffer the consequences of our actions.
6
Luciifuge Apr 11, 2026 +11
Not just that, but that no military can reach their shores. Which still holds true
11
Medallicat Apr 12, 2026 +17
The strategy of Us foreign policy has since WWII been creating discord and social unrest in allied and neutral countries while fighting proxy wars against Russia and China. By fighting all their wars on foreign soil they keep it off of their soil.
17
Crypt33x Apr 12, 2026 +1
Submarines are popping up near US shores all the time.
1
Ok-Yak7370 Apr 12, 2026 +14
Iran famously non-sggressive patron of peace loving Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, Assad and various Iraqi militias
14
Firm-Advertising5396 Apr 12, 2026 +4
The omnipotence was brushed aside when trump demanded unconditional surrender and Iran mocked him.
4
Luppercus Apr 11, 2026 +12
And ironically they don't win a war since, when? like 1945
12
shaolinoli Apr 11, 2026 +13
Even then it was very, very much a joint effort  Edit: forgot about the pacific theatre. Fair play yeah 
13
PhysicallyTender Apr 12, 2026 +8
China played a significant role in the Pacific theatre too.
8
lebennaia Apr 12, 2026 +2
As did Commonwealth forces.
2
Luppercus Apr 11, 2026 +10
>Even then it was very, very much a joint effort  No doubt, tho they sure like to played it like the saved the whole world and the rest did nothing.
10
No_Street8874 Apr 12, 2026 +1
To be fair the other wars were also joint efforts.
1
trojan_man16 Apr 11, 2026 -8
America best Saddam twice. That’s it for American military victories since WW2. Either losses or ties.
-8
Medallicat Apr 12, 2026 +14
They didn’t do it alone and is it really an achievement to pummel an adversary 1/10th your size? The Iraqi population was 17 million in 1990 and 26 million in 2003. The US population was 248 million in 1990 and 289 million in 2003. The First gulf war was a coalition of 41 nations against Iraq. The second was a coalition of four nations and armed insurgent forces (Kurds etc)
14
Nileghi Apr 12, 2026 -4
> They didn’t do it alone and is it really an achievement to pummel an adversary 1/10th your size? I mean 10 million Israelis vs 89 million Iranians.
-4
Medallicat Apr 12, 2026 +5
Nobody is talking about Israel
5
OsomoMojoFreak Apr 12, 2026 +2
Yeah, Israel isn't getting any support at all from the US.
2
Nileghi Apr 12, 2026
Israel's been kicking Iran's ass even since the Soviet era when they were their primary backer, thats some pure cope
0
Luppercus Apr 11, 2026
Fair enough.
0
HunterFeeFee Apr 12, 2026 +1
*was*
1
lupi64 Apr 11, 2026 +1
Yes but What was 9/11 then?!
1
The_Corvair Apr 11, 2026 +43
It actually proves the point. 9/11 was a singular action that - in the grand scheme of things - is barely a blip on the radar of hostilities; No invasion, no sustained assault, "just" two explosions and 3 thousand dead. Compare and contrast the current war in Ukraine, which has gone on for 1,500 days, and which dings a higher casualty toll about every two days. And yet, 9/11's impact on the US psyche was so massive that it still loudly reverberates to this day: *Because* US-Americans have no experience with war on their door step. That's also, I would surmise, why most other countries aren't so gung-ho and nonchalant about starting wars; They are not in that privileged position where they'd be basically immune to military retaliatory action, and can't just whap their d*** around without consequence.
43
gc11117 Apr 11, 2026 -12
Yeah, im sorry but I think you'd be hard pressed to find a nation that would not go to war if a 9/11 event happened to them. The only limiting factor would be if they had the power projection capabilities to do something about it.
-12
The_Corvair Apr 11, 2026 +16
> you'd be hard pressed to find a nation that would not go to war if a 9/11 event happened to them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States_in_the_21st_century It was all 9/11 that done did that!
16
gc11117 Apr 11, 2026 +2
I'm honestly not understanding your point
2
Existing-Joke3994 Apr 11, 2026 +12
It’s because you didn’t understand their original point. You latched onto defending the US reaction to 9/11 and missed the point.
12
gc11117 Apr 11, 2026 +4
Then what is their original point?
4
The_Corvair Apr 12, 2026 +8
Sorry for the late reply (I went to bed). The original point is the following: 1. Most countries around the world are geographically located in such a manner where they cannot attack another nation without inviting defensive action onto their own territory. The US is in the fortunate position that this is an extremely unlikely scenario for them. 2. Pretty much the only time *any* aggression against them happened on their home turf was 9/11 (I plain forgot Pearl Harbor; Show that I'm not an American, probably). 3. The way the US reacted (a massive, protracted war effort that spiraled into more and more war and atrocities as well as the cultural enshrining of this event as a turning point for the nation) reinforces the point that they never even thought about being hit at home. To contrast this, look at other wars around the globe. I used the Ukrainian conflict, because that's current, and I frankly am not a war buff. Ukraine has been getting hammered with drones and missiles on their civilian structures and homes pretty much for 1,500+ days straight. The toll of death and invalids on both sides combined continues to be so high that they could commemorate a 9/11 every few days. The point is that the US perspective is incredibly warped when contrasted with the rest of the world. Imagine if all those missiles Iran launched at neighbouring states had hit cities like New York, Chicago, Palm Beach, or SF. I have heard about the death of those 13 service members¹ a lot more often than about the dire situation US-Israeli bombings have wreaked on Tehran - a city of 11 million people! The US is pretty much a giant with a glass jaw - because you are in, to iterate, the most fortunate position that any reprisal to your aggression is incredibly hard to put on your own home soil, where citizens would actually then experience *war*. And most of the rest of the world just ain't that lucky, and that's why we generally (me speaking as a German, surrounded by other countries) have a vested interest in *not* warring, but actually talking to each other. Hegseth and his bomb negotiations can go and exile themselves to Venus, lots of free real estate to blow up there. --- ¹and I do not mean to downplay those; Every single death here is a double tragedy because the Iranian war has been started for no good or defensible reason at all, as far as we can make out. But they are weighted incredibly highly when put up against the hundreds, thousands, possibly tens of thousands of civilian casualties the rest of the region is suffering. The daring rescue of those two pilots looks positively farcical next to the blase attitude the Dept of War Crimes showcased for the destruction of that girls' school. And again, I do not mean to put that effort down. Every life is precious. Which is exactly why the aggression the US so thoughtlessly pursues needs addressing.
8
lupi64 Apr 11, 2026 -13
Well, this might be overgeneralizing since US-Americans (residents) actually do come from war zones overseas. I understand what you mean, but it's time we move past certain false assumptions and ideas.
-13
hi-fen-n-num Apr 11, 2026 +7
This is really not the time to be making that point.
7
Jpup199 Apr 12, 2026 +1
It worked with Venezuela and they thought it was going to be the same with everyone else ignoring that Venezuela has no real army just a bunch scarecrows in uniform.
1
Valderius Apr 11, 2026 +194
Who had "papal excommunication of world leaders coming back into vogue" on their bingo card?
194
bangtansalt Apr 11, 2026 +44
About time they get on it.
44
victorix58 Apr 12, 2026 +4
Excommunication only applies to Catholics and Trump is not a Catholic.
4
NorwigenRedBaron Apr 12, 2026 +8
But JD is one.
8
RainyDayColor Apr 11, 2026 +210
>*“Even the holy Name of God, the God of life, is being dragged into discourses of death.”* Hoo boy. First JD the “Catholic” and now Pete the “Christian.” Not a good sign when the first US-born Pope calls you out on the world stage. Here’s hoping that Papa Leo the ANTIFA will go for the trifecta with the next and best proxy smiting of all.
210
inksmudgedhands Apr 12, 2026 +65
All he has to say is how this administration is breaking the Third Commandment. The commandment that says you should not use the Lord's name in vain. Because that's exactly what Vance, Hegseth, Trump and the rest of this lot are doing. Using God's name to further their agenda. Their vanity. For as much as this administration wants to put the Ten Commandments in every public building none of them follow a single commandment. They sure worship money more than God. That's breaking the First and Second Commandment. Most of them can't be found at church on Sunday unless doing so is part of their grift. The rest of the commandments? No stealing. No lying? No killing? No adultery? Come on now...
65
thefunkygibbon Apr 12, 2026 +33
you're speaking as though anyone following maga is actually a decent Christian and not just someone who is using it as a reason to feel superior and part of the gang.
33
spongebobisha Apr 12, 2026 +6
Going up against the leader of the Church could be the final straw. Let’s hope his next deranged diatribe on social media does exactly that.
6
RainbowCrown71 Apr 11, 2026 -15
He's the first American Pope. Saying US-born suggests he was like the son of diplomats or something. But agree with your point.
-15
RainyDayColor Apr 11, 2026 +23
The first South Side homeboy Pope. Better?
23
RainbowCrown71 Apr 11, 2026 +5
Yes, much better
5
RainyDayColor Apr 11, 2026 +6
*Whew!* We aim to please. And to never, ever piss off Leo.
6
itspronouncedbolonya Apr 11, 2026 +21
But he's not the first *american* pope Francis was argentinian
21
RainyDayColor Apr 11, 2026 +16
Bless you.
16
itspronouncedbolonya Apr 12, 2026 +4
I'm gonna take that as a compliment, thank you
4
Unlikely-Complex3737 Apr 11, 2026 +52
The Vatican knew what they were doing by choosing an American pope.
52
Opposite-Bit6660 Apr 12, 2026 +21
I thought that from the beginning.  An American who was revered in Latin America, too.
21
Evening-Emotion3388 Apr 12, 2026 +7
Technically he is Latino by citizenship and ancestry (Haitian ancestor)
7
KatieBun Apr 12, 2026 +76
My mother is a 96-year-old Irish catholic, and she LOVED Pope Francis. He walked the walk of living simply, without trappings of wealth, and prioritising ministry of those most in need. The fact that he was a Jesuit and so had intellectual cred was a big plus. She was devastated when he died. In truth, I don’t think anybody they would have picked for Pope would’ve made her happy. She’s still mourns the loss of Francis to the world today, and she misses his influence in her life. But when they picked a guy from South Chicago, she was genuinely peeved. Like, we all knew when they picked Benedict that it was a dreadful dreadful pick. But she really worried about a pope from the USA. Because she has lived her life in a world where the USA has constantly thrown its weight around and assumed the right to tell everybody else how to live their lives. And because she is of that generation of Catholics, she understands what it means to be a member of each particular order. She was not happy that he was an Augustinian. Too theoretical, not enough focus on helping your actual fellow man. Then it was announced that he was going to go back and live in the Papal apartments that Francis had rejected. That was it! Leo was condemned in her mind. I was actually more optimistic about him. He had spent his life serving in Peru. He was clearly more conservative, yet he seemed to be a compromise candidate who could bring the two warring factions of the Catholic Church into some kind of harmony. He had taken Peruvian citizenship, which I felt symbolically was important. And Francis had appointed him a Cardinal in his last year. I figured if he was good enough for Francis, who was I to doubt him? Anyway, Leo has maintained very traditional views on issues such as married priests and women in the priesthood. But as soon as Trump started pulling Maga shit, Leo was quick to call the behaviours out. I enjoyed seeing a south Chicago boy give the Long Island suburbanite a dose of reality. In the last 2 to 3 months, Leo has focused relentlessly on the unacceptability of what the Trump presidency is doing. And true to his Augustinian training, he has based these statements on what is said in the Bible, and the deep philosophy of Augustinian theology. No, of course Trump doesn’t care about what the Pope says, even if he was capable of processing these statements. Neither does Hegseth, who probably has no respect for the pope as a fundamentalist Christian. JD Vance, if he was being true to himself, would find these statements difficult to ignore. Unfortunately, there was a time when Vance condemned Trump. He seems to have made the decision to abandon principles for power. Leo’s statements are continual commentary on what is required of a Just Leader. They tell us Catholics (even the dreaded À la Carte Catholics like myself) that no, we’re not losing our minds, we are living in truly desperate times. And they are an unspoken rebuke to Pius XI and XII who absolutely should’ve been as vocal in condemning Hitler in the 1930s and 40s. Pope Francis will always be #1 in Mum’s ranking of popes. But Leo has unexpectedly achieved the #2 spot! In these days when we brace ourselves to look at the news, announcement from Pope Leo are genuine causes for joy. Not that it lessens at all the impact of what is being done by Trump and Netanyahu. But because it tells us that we are not insane, that we are right to believe that these men are evil, and that we must hope for better days.
76
laffnlemming Apr 12, 2026 +18
I like Pope Leo.
18
sbprintz Apr 12, 2026 +21
TLDR: she likes the new Pope
21
KatieBun Apr 12, 2026 +4
Thank you! That covers it 🤦🏻‍♀️😂👏
4
SkyEclipse Apr 12, 2026 +2
I don’t know much about the Popes but Pope Francis did seem pretty nice from what I had seen. Anyway I enjoyed your entire comment and I hope Pope Leo will be just as great as Francis in time.
2
JTadaki Apr 12, 2026 +2
Thank you for sharing this!
2
victorix58 Apr 12, 2026 +5
Pope Francis was great. Pope Leo is pretty cool. But youre giving Pope Benedict unfair criticism I think. He was, perhaps, too intellectual to inspire a lot of people. However he did have the original thinking and courage to step down when he was too old to lead anymore. That had not been done in a very long time and there wouldn't have been a Pope Francis but for that.
5
Far_Out_6and_2 Apr 11, 2026 +60
Good for him i like this Pope actually
60
Far_Out_6and_2 Apr 12, 2026 -6
I don’t need upvotes really
-6
t-earlgrey-hot Apr 11, 2026 +63
Not religious but as someone who grew up catholic, its nice to see the Pope calling out the hypocrisy. I have many issues with organized religion but generally it preaches peace, helping others, putting others before yourself, denouncing greed, etc. Using religion as rationale for a war of aggression, or any violence that isn't to defend others is inherently hypocritical and no one could look at the teachings of Jesus or the christian/catholic church and argue otherwise
63
xmaspruden Apr 12, 2026 +10
I’m guessing you mean in the modern day context? Because that rationale was used by the church to justify wars for centuries
10
t-earlgrey-hot Apr 12, 2026 +10
For sure, religion has been used to galvinize the masses for war since we prayed to the spirits
10
buldozr Apr 11, 2026 +27
Careful there Mr. Pope, Whiskey Sec. Pete can Avignon your ass in three days flat. – Pentagon, probably.
27
nionvox Apr 11, 2026 +27
Which would make him an instant martyr for the entire Catholic world, and then some. That's a lot of soft power. 
27
macross1984 Apr 11, 2026 +19
The pope is making accurate assessment of Trump in the header.
19
yosisoy Apr 12, 2026 +3
The man pretends to represent an omnipotent being
3
Venat14 Apr 11, 2026 +19
I wish the Pope would excommunicate JD Vance and ban him from the Vatican. Seems unlikely, but Vance has done enough evil to justify it at this point.
19
wwfmike Apr 12, 2026 +2
I really wonder how Vance would respond to that. His beliefs (at least his political ones) seem to sway with whatever benefits him at the time.
2
Hautamaki Apr 12, 2026 +4
Yes, just one of many delusions. I feel like Monty Python could redo the entire Spanish Inquisition sketch by just naming more and more delusions fueling Trumpism.
4
SethOval Apr 12, 2026 +7
God Bless, and protect our pope. 
7
globaloffender Apr 12, 2026 +6
Doesn’t the Vatican have shit loads of old money, and gold, and membership (tidings?) and everything else to be able to extinguish these flames? F****** bury them somehow
6
Jealous_Acorn Apr 11, 2026 +8
Pope Leo. If you continue speaking out in favor of peace and against this evil, I promise I will stop trying to convince people of my personal negative view of the Catholic Church.
8
DW496 Apr 11, 2026 +2
I love the pope and the sentiment. But, tbf, this is a pretty amazing bit of dark irony coming from the Holy See.
2
DW496 Apr 11, 2026 +2
oh come on - this is the guy that sits in the same seat as the head of the holy roman empire that decimated many, many civilizations in the name of omnipotence. It's at least a little funny!
2
Opposite-Bit6660 Apr 12, 2026 +2
We are trying to evolve from that.
2
redddddddddditor Apr 11, 2026 +2
Does Trump even know what the word “omnipotence” means? 😂😂😂
2
abbzug Apr 12, 2026 +10
"Isn't that what the blue pill is for?"
10
Tennessee1977 Apr 12, 2026 +1
This Pope is great.
1
Public-Student-2160 Apr 11, 2026 -1
Consistency with Character: God's omnipotence does not mean He can act against His own nature. He cannot lie or perform evil actions, as these would contradict His perfect character. His power is always exercised in accordance with His justice, truth, and love
-1
uknownix Apr 12, 2026 +1
Trump (through Israel) did a Putin... And like Putin was fed a lie and has faced unexpected resistance. Unlike Putin, he doesn't have the power to waste 100s of thousands of troops as there are limits.
1
AccordionORama Apr 12, 2026 +1
"Delusions of omnipotence" is pretty rich coming from an office that has declared itself to be infallible.
1
SmurfsNeverDie Apr 11, 2026 -7
Pope Leo has no power here. The usa was built on the fundamental belief that the pope has no power in affairs of the us government.
-7
Cyathea_Australis Apr 11, 2026 +18
You say that but the administration has framed the war in iran as a holy war.
18
SmurfsNeverDie Apr 12, 2026 -5
Their god is money. They dont care about the pope.
-5
Medallicat Apr 12, 2026
Delusion of omnipotence leads to impotence
0
WolfySpice Apr 11, 2026 -11
Literal ironic from a man who claims to be infallible.
-11
KatieBun Apr 12, 2026 +10
Papal Infallability refers to specific statements issued by the Pope relating to a teaching of the Church. To be infallible, the statement must be divinely inspired, and based on the gospels. While there has been a tradition of infallibility in the Roman Catholic Church going back to the 2nd or 3rd century, the dogma was only formally declared in 1870. Since 1870, it has been used exactly once - in 1950, defining the Assuming of Mary into heaven as a full living human. Hope this is useful.
10
Halinn Apr 12, 2026 +11
The pope does not claim to be infallible.
11
noahboddy Apr 12, 2026
And who worships a being that claims to be omnipotent
0
Taykeshi Apr 12, 2026
The pope should run for president
0
Jabulon Apr 12, 2026
Isn't peace reachable through peaceful means?
0
[deleted] Apr 11, 2026 -2
[deleted]
-2
yethos Apr 11, 2026 +6
oh my god bro, I'm so tired of you listnook atheists and I'm a hindu
6
[deleted] Apr 11, 2026
[deleted]
0
yethos Apr 11, 2026 +1
wait then what are u. either wah u literally misinterpreted him. the point was that trump thinks he is omnipotent i.e thinks he's God. that's blasphemous in all three religions, and is more of a problem with humanity as a whole.
1
hi-fen-n-num Apr 11, 2026 -14
Two for two in a row for not absolutely [complete] piece's of shit Pope's. These are wild times.
-14
← Back to Board