· 120 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 11, 2026 at 7:55 PM

Pope Leo XIV denounces the ‘delusion of omnipotence’ he says fuels the US-Israeli war in Iran

Posted by No_Idea_Guy


Pope Leo XIV denounces the 'delusion of omnipotence' he says fuels the US-Israeli war in Iran
AP News
Pope Leo XIV denounces the 'delusion of omnipotence' he says fuels the US-Israeli war in Iran
Pope Leo XIV has denounced the “delusion of omnipotence” that is fueling the U.S.-Israel war in Iran and demanded political leaders stop and negotiate peace.

🚩 Report this post

120 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
nemoknows 1 day ago +736
A big part of US aggression is the belief that nobody could fight back.
736
Thurak0 1 day ago +236
They weren't paying attention the 20 years in Afghanistan then and that is absolute recent history.
236
FenrisCain 1 day ago +267
But it didnt effect Americans back home at all, that's the point. They live in their little bubble of ignorance, safe on their continent while their troops die and suffer to ruin countries on the other side of the world.
267
ElPuppyNation 1 day ago +80
Yeah maybe Americans needs a reminder that they aren't untouchable. Did they all forget 9/11? The US should sit the f*** down right now. We haven't seen terrorist attacks with drones yet.
80
BlipBlapBloppityBoop 1 day ago +192
I get a sense that Americans by and large see 9/11 as them being victims of some unprovoked attack by one-dimensional evil people who simply hate America and liberty and freedom. Not an event of them reaping what they sowed.
192
Former_String8874 1 day ago +42
Well said, that's what it boils down to, in a nutshell 🤷🏻‍♀️
42
Hautamaki 1 day ago +19
Americans certainly saw it that way on 9/12. I think most Americans have learned a lot of valuable lessons about blowback and unintended consequences and whatnot since then. Hence why every military intervention the US did since Iraq polled very badly before hand and only improved its numbers if it was done anyway to major success. Which has been very rare; only example off the top of my head would be the Venezuela kidnapping, and even then, is that even 50%? Or just popular with MAGA? But also, so did Al Qaeda and their later imitators. Yes they landed a good punch on America and accomplished a lot of their philosophical/ideological objectives. But they also got hunted down and killed everywhere they existed. They even got thrown under the bus by the Taliban in Afghanistan, and replaced by ISIS in Iraq, which was then also crushed by a major international coalition headed by the US. Terrorists have also learned a valuable lesson about launching direct attacks on America; if you do it at all, keep it small enough to be forgotten about. Since 9/11 terrorists have largely focused their fire in Israel and Europe when not in their own backyards; the overwhelming majority of victims of terrorism after 9/11 are Muslims in war zones, mainly in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, and all over northern Africa.
19
dhaliman 1 day ago +4
Thanks for saying this, I would’ve been afraid to say this but this is true.
4
Ok-Yak7370 1 day ago -3
They weren't. That is you inventing an imaginary justified Bin Laden.
-3
No_Street8874 1 day ago -21
They were victims on 9/11 and unfortunately that justified them starting wars and causing lots of death.
-21
[deleted] 1 day ago +15
[removed]
15
RecordingSilly6118 1 day ago -2
What kind of unorganized bot comment is this? Firstly, The Gulf War was authorized by the UN Security council resolution 678, and supported by the other Gulf States, including UBLs home country of Saudi Arabia, who deployed close to a hundred thousand troops in the coalition. Afghanistan has nothing to do with oil, and the US was supported by the NATO ISAF coalition until 2012. Spamming the first links that you could find on google doesn't mean your argument is good. >Edit: im getting brigaded by hateful people without sources 🤷‍♀️ My Edit: lol of course its a hidden account who's whining about being "Brigaded" by 2 whole people responding to him and not agreeing with everything he says. 10 bucks he's not actually American. Edit 2: Blocked me like he did to the other guy lmao, and stealth edited it to go from "im getting brigaded by hateful people" to "im getting hated on and attacked by people". Being responded to is not being attacked lol.
-2
[deleted] 1 day ago -13
[deleted]
-13
lupi64 1 day ago +9
Timothy McVeigh would beg to differ with some folks.
9
Farabee 1 day ago +5
The last thing we need is another 9/11. That would only vindicate this regime and solidify support. Iran is going about this the smart way. Choking the world out economically is going to absolutely destroy Trump.
5
Ok-Leader-1824 1 day ago +8
Another 9/11 will make countless Americans actually want to fight people rather than feel apathetic.
8
[deleted] 1 day ago +10
So like Iran, Palestine and Lebanon right now
10
Ok-Leader-1824 1 day ago +1
Yep, what comes around is all around
1
AnteaterFormal7291 1 day ago +10
Haven't you seen the news? Americans born after 2001 can't remember anything longer than last week because of cell phones and tablets in school
10
No_Street8874 1 day ago -11
9/11 is part of what caused this. Many in the U.S. want a more isolationist approach, but 9/11 made it clear to them you either fight in Middle East or at home. They picked the Middle East.
-11
[deleted] 1 day ago -10
[deleted]
-10
Sacredloch 1 day ago -20
This comment is insanely contradictory you're so focused on owning the stupid ignorant Americans you aren't even paying attention to what you're saying. "the Americans aren't effected back home at all" "their troops die and suffer on the other side of the world". You yourself aren't even making much sense.
-20
Willrkjr 21 hr ago +2
No, as an American it makes perfect sense. Look at this war. Iranians have been getting bombed, hundreds of civilian deaths, of dead children. And what have Americans suffered? I’ll tell you, like less than 20 dead soldiers, and gas prices are up. The families of soldiers are affected, sure, but we don’t go to work at a hospital praying that Iran won’t blow it up with supersonic jets. Gas is up yeah, but I’m not having to drive by the blown out remains of a school on my way to work as a constant reminder that my little sister’s school might be next. It is simply incomparable. And Americans, yes stupid ignorant Americans - are more angry and focused on the gas prices than they are the actual terrorism we’re committing to these people. Bc that’s the only way they’re affected, literally, and that’s all they care about. Add “selfish” onto that description while we’re at it.
2
Hautamaki 1 day ago +15
They just thought that the only reason the Afghans successfully fought back was stupid bureacrats and JAGoffs and weak presidents refusing to let the army warcrime their way to a win. They were determined not to repeat that mistake by promising to do the biggest warcrimes ever, warcrimes like you've never seen, warcrimes never thought possible, and then Iran would be forced to surrender when they realized the stupid bureaucrats and JAGoffs and weak presidents were gone and now they were dealing with real manly men and the biggest strongest most beautiful navy ever created.
15
Medallicat 1 day ago +12
They sucked in Vietnam too. It’s all business. The people are expendable and always have been
12
LangyMD 1 day ago +6
Unfortunately, the US lucked into a stupidly powerful position in political geography. Nobody close by has the capacity to touch us militarily, and the Atlantic and Pacific oceans make it really, really hard for an opponent to attack us without us noticing first, which allows us to attack them before they're in range of the homeland. This is great if the US is good and moral, but if the US wants to dominate others it results in the homeland basically not caring if the US gets into a war. We just don't fight wars close to home and so don't suffer the consequences of our actions.
6
Luciifuge 1 day ago +11
Not just that, but that no military can reach their shores. Which still holds true
11
Medallicat 1 day ago +17
The strategy of Us foreign policy has since WWII been creating discord and social unrest in allied and neutral countries while fighting proxy wars against Russia and China. By fighting all their wars on foreign soil they keep it off of their soil.
17
Crypt33x 1 day ago +1
Submarines are popping up near US shores all the time.
1
Ok-Yak7370 1 day ago +14
Iran famously non-sggressive patron of peace loving Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, Assad and various Iraqi militias
14
Firm-Advertising5396 1 day ago +4
The omnipotence was brushed aside when trump demanded unconditional surrender and Iran mocked him.
4
Luppercus 1 day ago +12
And ironically they don't win a war since, when? like 1945
12
shaolinoli 1 day ago +13
Even then it was very, very much a joint effort  Edit: forgot about the pacific theatre. Fair play yeah 
13
PhysicallyTender 1 day ago +8
China played a significant role in the Pacific theatre too.
8
lebennaia 1 day ago +2
As did Commonwealth forces.
2
Luppercus 1 day ago +10
>Even then it was very, very much a joint effort  No doubt, tho they sure like to played it like the saved the whole world and the rest did nothing.
10
No_Street8874 1 day ago +1
To be fair the other wars were also joint efforts.
1
trojan_man16 1 day ago -8
America best Saddam twice. That’s it for American military victories since WW2. Either losses or ties.
-8
Medallicat 1 day ago +14
They didn’t do it alone and is it really an achievement to pummel an adversary 1/10th your size? The Iraqi population was 17 million in 1990 and 26 million in 2003. The US population was 248 million in 1990 and 289 million in 2003. The First gulf war was a coalition of 41 nations against Iraq. The second was a coalition of four nations and armed insurgent forces (Kurds etc)
14
Nileghi 1 day ago -4
> They didn’t do it alone and is it really an achievement to pummel an adversary 1/10th your size? I mean 10 million Israelis vs 89 million Iranians.
-4
Medallicat 1 day ago +5
Nobody is talking about Israel
5
OsomoMojoFreak 1 day ago +2
Yeah, Israel isn't getting any support at all from the US.
2
Nileghi 17 hr ago
Israel's been kicking Iran's ass even since the Soviet era when they were their primary backer, thats some pure cope
0
Luppercus 1 day ago
Fair enough.
0
HunterFeeFee 1 day ago +1
*was*
1
lupi64 1 day ago +1
Yes but What was 9/11 then?!
1
The_Corvair 1 day ago +43
It actually proves the point. 9/11 was a singular action that - in the grand scheme of things - is barely a blip on the radar of hostilities; No invasion, no sustained assault, "just" two explosions and 3 thousand dead. Compare and contrast the current war in Ukraine, which has gone on for 1,500 days, and which dings a higher casualty toll about every two days. And yet, 9/11's impact on the US psyche was so massive that it still loudly reverberates to this day: *Because* US-Americans have no experience with war on their door step. That's also, I would surmise, why most other countries aren't so gung-ho and nonchalant about starting wars; They are not in that privileged position where they'd be basically immune to military retaliatory action, and can't just whap their d*** around without consequence.
43
gc11117 1 day ago -12
Yeah, im sorry but I think you'd be hard pressed to find a nation that would not go to war if a 9/11 event happened to them. The only limiting factor would be if they had the power projection capabilities to do something about it.
-12
The_Corvair 1 day ago +16
> you'd be hard pressed to find a nation that would not go to war if a 9/11 event happened to them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States_in_the_21st_century It was all 9/11 that done did that!
16
gc11117 1 day ago +2
I'm honestly not understanding your point
2
Existing-Joke3994 1 day ago +12
It’s because you didn’t understand their original point. You latched onto defending the US reaction to 9/11 and missed the point.
12
gc11117 1 day ago +4
Then what is their original point?
4
The_Corvair 1 day ago +8
Sorry for the late reply (I went to bed). The original point is the following: 1. Most countries around the world are geographically located in such a manner where they cannot attack another nation without inviting defensive action onto their own territory. The US is in the fortunate position that this is an extremely unlikely scenario for them. 2. Pretty much the only time *any* aggression against them happened on their home turf was 9/11 (I plain forgot Pearl Harbor; Show that I'm not an American, probably). 3. The way the US reacted (a massive, protracted war effort that spiraled into more and more war and atrocities as well as the cultural enshrining of this event as a turning point for the nation) reinforces the point that they never even thought about being hit at home. To contrast this, look at other wars around the globe. I used the Ukrainian conflict, because that's current, and I frankly am not a war buff. Ukraine has been getting hammered with drones and missiles on their civilian structures and homes pretty much for 1,500+ days straight. The toll of death and invalids on both sides combined continues to be so high that they could commemorate a 9/11 every few days. The point is that the US perspective is incredibly warped when contrasted with the rest of the world. Imagine if all those missiles Iran launched at neighbouring states had hit cities like New York, Chicago, Palm Beach, or SF. I have heard about the death of those 13 service members¹ a lot more often than about the dire situation US-Israeli bombings have wreaked on Tehran - a city of 11 million people! The US is pretty much a giant with a glass jaw - because you are in, to iterate, the most fortunate position that any reprisal to your aggression is incredibly hard to put on your own home soil, where citizens would actually then experience *war*. And most of the rest of the world just ain't that lucky, and that's why we generally (me speaking as a German, surrounded by other countries) have a vested interest in *not* warring, but actually talking to each other. Hegseth and his bomb negotiations can go and exile themselves to Venus, lots of free real estate to blow up there. --- ¹and I do not mean to downplay those; Every single death here is a double tragedy because the Iranian war has been started for no good or defensible reason at all, as far as we can make out. But they are weighted incredibly highly when put up against the hundreds, thousands, possibly tens of thousands of civilian casualties the rest of the region is suffering. The daring rescue of those two pilots looks positively farcical next to the blase attitude the Dept of War Crimes showcased for the destruction of that girls' school. And again, I do not mean to put that effort down. Every life is precious. Which is exactly why the aggression the US so thoughtlessly pursues needs addressing.
8
lupi64 1 day ago -13
Well, this might be overgeneralizing since US-Americans (residents) actually do come from war zones overseas. I understand what you mean, but it's time we move past certain false assumptions and ideas.
-13
hi-fen-n-num 1 day ago +7
This is really not the time to be making that point.
7
Jpup199 1 day ago +1
It worked with Venezuela and they thought it was going to be the same with everyone else ignoring that Venezuela has no real army just a bunch scarecrows in uniform.
1
Valderius 1 day ago +194
Who had "papal excommunication of world leaders coming back into vogue" on their bingo card?
194
bangtansalt 1 day ago +44
About time they get on it.
44
victorix58 1 day ago +4
Excommunication only applies to Catholics and Trump is not a Catholic.
4
NorwigenRedBaron 23 hr ago +8
But JD is one.
8
RainyDayColor 1 day ago +210
>*“Even the holy Name of God, the God of life, is being dragged into discourses of death.”* Hoo boy. First JD the “Catholic” and now Pete the “Christian.” Not a good sign when the first US-born Pope calls you out on the world stage. Here’s hoping that Papa Leo the ANTIFA will go for the trifecta with the next and best proxy smiting of all.
210
inksmudgedhands 1 day ago +65
All he has to say is how this administration is breaking the Third Commandment. The commandment that says you should not use the Lord's name in vain. Because that's exactly what Vance, Hegseth, Trump and the rest of this lot are doing. Using God's name to further their agenda. Their vanity. For as much as this administration wants to put the Ten Commandments in every public building none of them follow a single commandment. They sure worship money more than God. That's breaking the First and Second Commandment. Most of them can't be found at church on Sunday unless doing so is part of their grift. The rest of the commandments? No stealing. No lying? No killing? No adultery? Come on now...
65
thefunkygibbon 1 day ago +33
you're speaking as though anyone following maga is actually a decent Christian and not just someone who is using it as a reason to feel superior and part of the gang.
33
spongebobisha 1 day ago +6
Going up against the leader of the Church could be the final straw. Let’s hope his next deranged diatribe on social media does exactly that.
6
RainbowCrown71 1 day ago -15
He's the first American Pope. Saying US-born suggests he was like the son of diplomats or something. But agree with your point.
-15
RainyDayColor 1 day ago +23
The first South Side homeboy Pope. Better?
23
RainbowCrown71 1 day ago +5
Yes, much better
5
RainyDayColor 1 day ago +6
*Whew!* We aim to please. And to never, ever piss off Leo.
6
itspronouncedbolonya 1 day ago +21
But he's not the first *american* pope Francis was argentinian
21
RainyDayColor 1 day ago +16
Bless you.
16
itspronouncedbolonya 1 day ago +4
I'm gonna take that as a compliment, thank you
4
Unlikely-Complex3737 1 day ago +52
The Vatican knew what they were doing by choosing an American pope.
52
Opposite-Bit6660 1 day ago +21
I thought that from the beginning.  An American who was revered in Latin America, too.
21
Evening-Emotion3388 1 day ago +7
Technically he is Latino by citizenship and ancestry (Haitian ancestor)
7
KatieBun 1 day ago +76
My mother is a 96-year-old Irish catholic, and she LOVED Pope Francis. He walked the walk of living simply, without trappings of wealth, and prioritising ministry of those most in need. The fact that he was a Jesuit and so had intellectual cred was a big plus. She was devastated when he died. In truth, I don’t think anybody they would have picked for Pope would’ve made her happy. She’s still mourns the loss of Francis to the world today, and she misses his influence in her life. But when they picked a guy from South Chicago, she was genuinely peeved. Like, we all knew when they picked Benedict that it was a dreadful dreadful pick. But she really worried about a pope from the USA. Because she has lived her life in a world where the USA has constantly thrown its weight around and assumed the right to tell everybody else how to live their lives. And because she is of that generation of Catholics, she understands what it means to be a member of each particular order. She was not happy that he was an Augustinian. Too theoretical, not enough focus on helping your actual fellow man. Then it was announced that he was going to go back and live in the Papal apartments that Francis had rejected. That was it! Leo was condemned in her mind. I was actually more optimistic about him. He had spent his life serving in Peru. He was clearly more conservative, yet he seemed to be a compromise candidate who could bring the two warring factions of the Catholic Church into some kind of harmony. He had taken Peruvian citizenship, which I felt symbolically was important. And Francis had appointed him a Cardinal in his last year. I figured if he was good enough for Francis, who was I to doubt him? Anyway, Leo has maintained very traditional views on issues such as married priests and women in the priesthood. But as soon as Trump started pulling Maga shit, Leo was quick to call the behaviours out. I enjoyed seeing a south Chicago boy give the Long Island suburbanite a dose of reality. In the last 2 to 3 months, Leo has focused relentlessly on the unacceptability of what the Trump presidency is doing. And true to his Augustinian training, he has based these statements on what is said in the Bible, and the deep philosophy of Augustinian theology. No, of course Trump doesn’t care about what the Pope says, even if he was capable of processing these statements. Neither does Hegseth, who probably has no respect for the pope as a fundamentalist Christian. JD Vance, if he was being true to himself, would find these statements difficult to ignore. Unfortunately, there was a time when Vance condemned Trump. He seems to have made the decision to abandon principles for power. Leo’s statements are continual commentary on what is required of a Just Leader. They tell us Catholics (even the dreaded À la Carte Catholics like myself) that no, we’re not losing our minds, we are living in truly desperate times. And they are an unspoken rebuke to Pius XI and XII who absolutely should’ve been as vocal in condemning Hitler in the 1930s and 40s. Pope Francis will always be #1 in Mum’s ranking of popes. But Leo has unexpectedly achieved the #2 spot! In these days when we brace ourselves to look at the news, announcement from Pope Leo are genuine causes for joy. Not that it lessens at all the impact of what is being done by Trump and Netanyahu. But because it tells us that we are not insane, that we are right to believe that these men are evil, and that we must hope for better days.
76
laffnlemming 1 day ago +18
I like Pope Leo.
18
sbprintz 1 day ago +21
TLDR: she likes the new Pope
21
KatieBun 1 day ago +4
Thank you! That covers it 🤦🏻‍♀️😂👏
4
SkyEclipse 20 hr ago +2
I don’t know much about the Popes but Pope Francis did seem pretty nice from what I had seen. Anyway I enjoyed your entire comment and I hope Pope Leo will be just as great as Francis in time.
2
JTadaki 1 day ago +2
Thank you for sharing this!
2
victorix58 1 day ago +5
Pope Francis was great. Pope Leo is pretty cool. But youre giving Pope Benedict unfair criticism I think. He was, perhaps, too intellectual to inspire a lot of people. However he did have the original thinking and courage to step down when he was too old to lead anymore. That had not been done in a very long time and there wouldn't have been a Pope Francis but for that.
5
Far_Out_6and_2 1 day ago +60
Good for him i like this Pope actually
60
Far_Out_6and_2 1 day ago -6
I don’t need upvotes really
-6
t-earlgrey-hot 1 day ago +63
Not religious but as someone who grew up catholic, its nice to see the Pope calling out the hypocrisy. I have many issues with organized religion but generally it preaches peace, helping others, putting others before yourself, denouncing greed, etc. Using religion as rationale for a war of aggression, or any violence that isn't to defend others is inherently hypocritical and no one could look at the teachings of Jesus or the christian/catholic church and argue otherwise
63
xmaspruden 1 day ago +10
I’m guessing you mean in the modern day context? Because that rationale was used by the church to justify wars for centuries
10
t-earlgrey-hot 1 day ago +10
For sure, religion has been used to galvinize the masses for war since we prayed to the spirits
10
buldozr 1 day ago +27
Careful there Mr. Pope, Whiskey Sec. Pete can Avignon your ass in three days flat. – Pentagon, probably.
27
nionvox 1 day ago +27
Which would make him an instant martyr for the entire Catholic world, and then some. That's a lot of soft power. 
27
macross1984 1 day ago +19
The pope is making accurate assessment of Trump in the header.
19
yosisoy 21 hr ago +3
The man pretends to represent an omnipotent being
3
Venat14 1 day ago +19
I wish the Pope would excommunicate JD Vance and ban him from the Vatican. Seems unlikely, but Vance has done enough evil to justify it at this point.
19
wwfmike 1 day ago +2
I really wonder how Vance would respond to that. His beliefs (at least his political ones) seem to sway with whatever benefits him at the time.
2
Hautamaki 1 day ago +4
Yes, just one of many delusions. I feel like Monty Python could redo the entire Spanish Inquisition sketch by just naming more and more delusions fueling Trumpism.
4
SethOval 1 day ago +7
God Bless, and protect our pope. 
7
globaloffender 1 day ago +6
Doesn’t the Vatican have shit loads of old money, and gold, and membership (tidings?) and everything else to be able to extinguish these flames? F****** bury them somehow
6
Jealous_Acorn 1 day ago +8
Pope Leo. If you continue speaking out in favor of peace and against this evil, I promise I will stop trying to convince people of my personal negative view of the Catholic Church.
8
DW496 1 day ago +2
I love the pope and the sentiment. But, tbf, this is a pretty amazing bit of dark irony coming from the Holy See.
2
DW496 1 day ago +2
oh come on - this is the guy that sits in the same seat as the head of the holy roman empire that decimated many, many civilizations in the name of omnipotence. It's at least a little funny!
2
Opposite-Bit6660 1 day ago +2
We are trying to evolve from that.
2
redddddddddditor 1 day ago +2
Does Trump even know what the word “omnipotence” means? 😂😂😂
2
abbzug 1 day ago +10
"Isn't that what the blue pill is for?"
10
Tennessee1977 18 hr ago +1
This Pope is great.
1
Public-Student-2160 1 day ago -1
Consistency with Character: God's omnipotence does not mean He can act against His own nature. He cannot lie or perform evil actions, as these would contradict His perfect character. His power is always exercised in accordance with His justice, truth, and love
-1
uknownix 1 day ago +1
Trump (through Israel) did a Putin... And like Putin was fed a lie and has faced unexpected resistance. Unlike Putin, he doesn't have the power to waste 100s of thousands of troops as there are limits.
1
AccordionORama 14 hr ago +1
"Delusions of omnipotence" is pretty rich coming from an office that has declared itself to be infallible.
1
SmurfsNeverDie 1 day ago -7
Pope Leo has no power here. The usa was built on the fundamental belief that the pope has no power in affairs of the us government.
-7
Cyathea_Australis 1 day ago +18
You say that but the administration has framed the war in iran as a holy war.
18
SmurfsNeverDie 1 day ago -5
Their god is money. They dont care about the pope.
-5
Medallicat 1 day ago
Delusion of omnipotence leads to impotence
0
WolfySpice 1 day ago -11
Literal ironic from a man who claims to be infallible.
-11
KatieBun 1 day ago +10
Papal Infallability refers to specific statements issued by the Pope relating to a teaching of the Church. To be infallible, the statement must be divinely inspired, and based on the gospels. While there has been a tradition of infallibility in the Roman Catholic Church going back to the 2nd or 3rd century, the dogma was only formally declared in 1870. Since 1870, it has been used exactly once - in 1950, defining the Assuming of Mary into heaven as a full living human. Hope this is useful.
10
Halinn 1 day ago +11
The pope does not claim to be infallible.
11
noahboddy 1 day ago
And who worships a being that claims to be omnipotent
0
Taykeshi 1 day ago
The pope should run for president
0
Jabulon 1 day ago
Isn't peace reachable through peaceful means?
0
[deleted] 1 day ago -2
[deleted]
-2
yethos 1 day ago +6
oh my god bro, I'm so tired of you listnook atheists and I'm a hindu
6
[deleted] 1 day ago
[deleted]
0
yethos 1 day ago +1
wait then what are u. either wah u literally misinterpreted him. the point was that trump thinks he is omnipotent i.e thinks he's God. that's blasphemous in all three religions, and is more of a problem with humanity as a whole.
1
hi-fen-n-num 1 day ago -14
Two for two in a row for not absolutely [complete] piece's of shit Pope's. These are wild times.
-14
← Back to Board