P*** website at center of CNN investigation into sexual abuse taken offline

That stunt was pretty well done. There was some buildup to it, then the 'webcam' stayed that way for quite some time. Then the website turned into p**********

The webbys were a big deal for a lot of us. That was the year The Onion won for comedy.

Be thankful you haven’t heard of efukt it sort of damaged my brain when I was 12

Well yes, it will always exist, but motherless was the big dog in the scene, so it was easier to police Now it'll be scattered across dozens of random popup sites

There is some really great international coverage of the picture rings associated with the much famed French case where a hubby solicited men from a community of people who drug their wives, daughters, women and document it via pics and vids to have sex with his unconscious wife. I wish it was just the "upload" but the pictures on websites like that are currency in those dark worlds. HOWEVER, the disgusting thing is that men are MAKING the content and then bragging about it. Dead ass, the ONLY reason why we are really talking about is as some dude in the Netherlands, if memory serves, gloated so hard on a ML chatroom that investigative journalists contacted him, confirmed his disgusting behavior, went to said country to meet the guy, got ghosted by him BUT used the skills of investigation to find the man at a party where they met the wife in question.....the one that had hundred of hours of recorded non consensual sex and thousands of pictures now scattered to the wind on the net. All of that is to say;yes, there are other tube sites, but there is only one ML.....

Shady businesses use shady hosts. Outright illegal operations will then use those hosts too, because again, the hosting business doesn't care.

[removed]

Is there evidence that violating content would stay up for heavily extended periods of time? I’ve seen dead bodies on Instagram and it’s still up

> Then the website needs to do a better job moderating its own content. If they cant do that, they get the hammer. Seems entirely fair. The offending content was never on motherless to begin with. It was on telegram. CNN linked this story to motherless for literally no reason.

How can you quickly tell the difference between kink roleplay content and actual assault content when you've got thousands of videos being posted daily and maybe one of those is depicting an actual assault? Even if you required something like a clip of everyone involved confirming consent in the beginning of the video that could be easily faked. There's a ton of kinks out there that I fully don't understand but I am not about to tell people they are no longer allowed to make or enjoy content of it when nobody is being (non-consensually) hurt by it.

Are there sources? I'm curious about the contexts and their responses. (The burden of proof, etc. etc.)

[deleted]