· 47 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 6, 2026 at 4:26 AM

P****** to become accessible again for some UK users

Posted by BusyHands_

Pornhub to become accessible again for some UK users
www.bbc.com
Pornhub to become accessible again for some UK users
UK iPhone users who have completed Apple's device-based age checks will no longer be blocked from the site's adult content.
🚩 Report this post

47 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
RephRayne 5 days ago +174
As a reminder for those who missed it, from 2022:- > Parliament blocks disclosure of MPs’ p*** site visits on ‘national security’ grounds https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/mps-p***-parliament-neil-parish-national-security-b2097695.html
174
micromanminisavage 5 days ago +74
AKA we watch so much p*** that it could be exploited by foreign actors to compromise the state or its representatives.
74
tedsmitts 5 days ago +27
China already knows about your predilection for “cake farts” you wrongun
27
adx931 5 days ago +7
Hey, don't cake shame him.
7
Silver-Bread4668 5 days ago +25
Our world would be a better place on so many levels if people just stopped giving a f*** about that shit as long as it's legal and consensual. We're humans. Sex is a part of literally every single one of our lives. Hiding it as if it's some shameful thing only makes it harder to deal with actual real problems around it.
25
buzzsawjoe 4 days ago +7
An old man was turning 75 next week. So his sons got together to decide what kind of a birthday present to get him. They were manly men; so on the day of, he answered the doorbell to find a woman wearing lavish makeup and odd clothing. She said "Hi! I'm here to give you Super Sex!!" He said, "well, uh, come on in, but at my age, I think I'm going to have to go with the soup."
7
Flash_ina_pan 5 days ago +269
Staying home and having a wank is good for the oil crisis. Edit: Flick the bean for the economy.
269
THEPIGWHODIDIT 5 days ago +38
Attach a dynamo and solve the energy crisis
38
d0ntst0pme 5 days ago +8
P******'s Wankband concept comes to mind
8
keep_trying_username 5 days ago +31
Econo-bean
31
Automatic_Rabbit82 5 days ago +9
"P****** et circenses?"
9
eaglebtc 4 days ago +1
That almost reads as "p****** and circumcisions"
1
Retireegeorge 5 days ago +5
Just make sure you're using a water based lubricant. You can tell if it's shit.
5
donkeybrainhero 5 days ago +1
Flick Bean economies are much better than Trickle Out
1
sentri_sable 4 days ago +1
It worked for 50 shades
1
Hellstorm901 5 days ago +119
Just revoke the OSA, it’s doesn’t protect children who are smart enough to circumvent it or have parents who just give their children age permission to access adult sites with no consequences for them doing so If you want to protect children spend whatever fines Ofcom have already extorted from companies by behaving like the mafia and invest it in police and child protection charities Then again that’s not going to happen as the government rather like having a law in place where they can shut down sites or get the identities of any users which they don’t like by simply defining the site as being “Inappropriate for children”
119
Bobo3076 5 days ago +60
They won’t revoke the OSA because it has nothing to do with protecting children. It’s a lie being used to push mass surveillance.
60
itskdog 5 days ago +26
IIRC, they've been talking about copying Australia, and going through with it no matter the outcome of the consultation.
26
ICC-u 5 days ago +7
Where's the source on "going through with it no matter the outcome" from what I've seen it's the opposite, they're consulting on it but have said they're not planning on implementing anything.
7
itskdog 5 days ago +7
Doing some research, it seems that an outright ban isn't guaranteed, but they're not backing down from doing *something* for under-16s, so age detection will be needed either way. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y7d2zx63jo
7
adx931 5 days ago +1
Until they're imprisoning parents for abuse for allowing their kids access to the horrors of The Computer then they're not really serious about protecting children.
1
MisterPistacchio 5 days ago +34
Some users? Another one of those unfair instances of ... "Rules for thee.... While I whacky my weenie" huh?
34
DoubleTapJ 5 days ago +8
If you buy a new apple product, you too can view p**********!!! The fact you have to do she verification for the apple device is worrying as well. Well luckily a VPN is much cheaper and protects me in other ways.
8
Effective-Knee366 5 days ago +18
Nothing unites Brits faster than losing access to websites they definitely never use.
18
jpfed 4 days ago +3
I have been doing so much ADA-related web development recently that the headline sounded like P****** was, at least for some UK users, finally getting quality video transcripts, alt text, navigable sections and headings, and a color-scheme with adequate contrast.
3
Secret_Cow_5053 5 days ago +4
[…and there was much rejoicing](https://youtu.be/yciX2meIkXI?si=eDTlOqUWYppunUWV)
4
Certain_Luck_8266 5 days ago +2
Headline: BBC reports people in the UK can resume searching for BBC on p******
2
[deleted] 5 days ago +5
[deleted]
5
Hattix 5 days ago +7
When you're not UK based. BBC Worldwide is a commercial self-supported entity and is forbidden from using public funds. They'll show ads too.
7
lasarus29 5 days ago +2
Maybe that's why iPlayer isn't offered as a subscription service around the globe. I always thought that would have been a smart move. Perhaps there's too much red tape.
2
Unumbotte 5 days ago +12
I'd like to answer your question, but I'm going to need you to pay me first.
12
Logical_Net6108 5 days ago
If the world can get free BBC content can I get free HBO to watch the Sopranos?
0
eldiablo22590 5 days ago +6
About a year ago, if you disable JavaScript in your browser while reading you can bypass it
6
Whatdoesthibattahndo 5 days ago +7
r/loicense in shambles
7
barnfodder 5 days ago +5
Should have invested in a VPN company before the OSA came along.
5
Retireegeorge 5 days ago +8
I'm sure politicians did.
8
Hellstorm901 5 days ago +16
VPN’s are used by various public sectors for the actual intended purpose of hiding their computers from prying eyes like foreign intelligence It’s been pointed out, not that this government is listening, that if the UK moves to block all VPN’s as they’re aiming to do with the obvious exception of government usage it’s going to be very easy for foreign intelligence services to figure out which computers are government ones when the only payments to VPN companies from the UK “businesses” are obviously going to be the government computers
16
Retireegeorge 5 days ago +5
Yes I see! When you cut back the quantity of things in the internet your security via being hidden in a crowd is lost.
5
egoVirus 4 days ago +1
For research purposes...
1
uselessandexpensive 3 days ago +1
I was actually happy to hear there was pressure on PH from some countries over "step-sibling" and "step-child" content. Incest-adjacent content is still gross. Age verification efforts may or may not either be fine or cause problems. But they can definitely do better on not distrbuting simulated problematic situation fantasies.
1
JiveChicken00 2 days ago +1
Isn’t access to p*** a fundamental human right?
1
squamishunderstander 5 days ago
care for a cheeky wank bruv
0
theDinoSour 5 days ago +3
The velveteen touch of a dandy fap!
3
Living-Dimension7798 4 days ago +1
I’m just here to say I love OP’s profile pic I’m relation to this.
1
Selahmom1376 5 days ago
Florida has entered the chat...
0
BigD3nergy 5 days ago
This feels good for everyone in the UK 🇬🇧 3=✊🏻=D 💦
0
Rogaar 4 days ago
These sites are also blocked in Australia. Funny thing is there is such an easy way around it. And no, I know what you're thinking. I'm not referring to a VPN. It's even easier then that. Don't bother asking me for instructions or how to do it. I am not going to be responsible for sharing how to get around your laws. I like my freedom thank you very much.
0
← Back to Board